Showing posts sorted by date for query Zelenskiy. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Zelenskiy. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, January 31, 2026

Military head warns Trump may carry out 'forever-war' despite having ability to end it

"The U.S. is now 0 for 7 in its negotiations with Russia to end the war — chiefly because Ukraine stubbornly refuses to commit national suicide.

Ewan Gleadow
January 29, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 28, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

A top US military official has warned Donald Trump may prolong the end of the war in Ukraine.

Colonel Jonathan Sweet explained how the president could bring the conflict between Russian and Ukraine to an end, but that it would rely on military intervention and the help of NATO. He wrote in The Hill, "Trump has the cards to end the war, but those cards need to be played against Russia and not Ukraine.

"He must coerce Russia to stop attacking, give up their territorial aspirations for the Donbas, and accept a European military peace-keeping force in Ukraine.

"That will likely require military force. It begins with a NATO-enforced no-fly zone over western Ukraine, sufficiently arming Kyiv to defeat Russian forces in Ukraine, and destroying Moscow’s ability to fund and sustain the war.

"Anything less equals a Team Trump forever war in Europe." Sweet had previously referred to this prolonged decision-making as a "forever war" which Trump may have orchestrated.

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner were present for talks between the two nations, which Col. Sweet says did little to ease the tensions.

He wrote, "The talks commenced and concluded in Abu Dhabi the next day. The outcome? Russia refused to back off their maximalist demands and continued to demand Ukraine unilaterally withdraw from the Donbas.

"The U.S. is now 0 for 7 in its negotiations with Russia to end the war — chiefly because Ukraine stubbornly refuses to commit national suicide.

"Kyiv will not give Moscow in negotiations what the Russians cannot take on the battlefield. Nor should they be persuaded or coerced into doing so."

EU diplomats believe the relationship with Trump has broken down and that their dreams of working with him and the administration in the future are dead.

One EU diplomat said, "Our American Dream is dead. Donald Trump murdered it." Another senior envoy from a country described as a "key American ally" by Politico suggested the "trust is lost" with the U.S.

They added, "We are experiencing a great rupture of the world order."

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

COMPRADOR

Belarusian opposition leader Kolesnikova adds to calls for Europe to engage with Putin, Lukashenko

Belarusian opposition leader Kolesnikova adds to calls for Europe to engage with Putin, Lukashenko
Belarusian opposition leader Maria Kolesnikova added her voice to the growing number ofcalls for Europe to engage in direct talks with Lukashenko and Putin. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin January 21, 2026

Belarusian opposition leader Maria Kolesnikova said that it's time for Europe to engage in talks with pariahed Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko, in a remarkable contrast with her colleagues who have spent more than five years asking for the sanctions screws on Minks to be tightened.

Recently released from jail where she was serving an 11-year sentence on politically motivated charges, Kolesnikova argues that “Lukashenko is a pragmatic person. He understands the language of business. If he is ready for humanitarian steps in response to a relaxation of sanctions, including the release of prisoners and allowing independent media and NGOs into Belarus, this needs to be discussed.”

While her opposition leader colleagues largely fled the country after the mass demonstrations sparked by the massively falsified presidential election in August 2020 began to fade, Kolesnikova stayed on until she was snatched from the street by security forces and thrown in jail.

As bne IntelliNews reported, there has been arguments amongst the Belarusian government in exile, headed by Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya (Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya) who ran in the 2020 elections against Lukashenko and is believed to have won by a landslide.

Tikhanovskaya leads a faction within the opposition that believe they should lobby Europe to tighten sanctions and release all of the some 1,300 remaining political prisoners still in jail at once.

However, after a string of political prisoner releases brokered by the White House, there are others that believe a step by step approach would be more effective – an argument boosted by the release of high profile prisoners in a series of deals in the last year, including the release of Kolesnikov herself and Tikhanovskaya’s husband, Sergei last June.

The US success has clearly had an impact on the debate. “But as someone with a European mindset, I do not understand why Europe did not start talking to Lukashenko before the US,” Kolesnikova said. “It is obvious that Germany, for example, has far more ties with Belarus than the States.”

Her argument runs counter to Europe’s approach of keeping links with Belarusian democratic forces in exile, minimising contacts with the regime, and maintaining economic sanctions on exports, a ban on flights and tighter visa rules.

Promoting this kind of dialogue — particularly aimed at securing the release of other political prisoners and preventing further repressions — is now her focus. “I think it’s clear that I’m not leaving politics.”

“One day the regime will change,” Kolesnikova told the FT. “And by that point, there must not be scorched earth there. We must prepare the ground.”

Europe’s hardline is softening

For all his myriad faults, Trump’s two biggest successes has been to hold the first direct talks with Putin since the failed 2022 Istanbul peace deal talks and make real progress towards bringing the war in Ukraine to an end. The second is he has brokered the release of some 200 political prisoners from Belarusian jails as relations with the US begin to thaw.

Europe’s hardline policy of sending authoritarian leaders to Coventry is starting to melt as the war in Ukraine goes nowhere, Europe finds itself in increasingly difficult financial straits and US President Donald Trump puts the cat amongst the pigeons with his efforts to dismantle the international rules-based order.

The pressure on Kyiv to capitulate is mounting fast and Europe is increasingly powerless to prevent that from happening. Since the start of January Russia has launched a missile and drone barrage against Ukraine’s biggest cities that has plunged them into a hell of freezing cold and darkness. As of the time of writing, residents of Kyiv are starting to flee the increasingly uninhabitable capital where temperatures inside some of the blacked out apartment blocks have fallen to below -5°C according to local reports.

Around one in six residents heeded Mayor Vitali Klitschko's call for temporary evacuation: 600,000 of the 3.6mn inhabitants have left the city since January 9, Klitschko told the AFP news agency. "Not everyone has the opportunity to leave the city, but the population is currently shrinking," Klitschko said.

And since the Trump administration cut off all funding to Ukraine and won’t sell it weapons unless Europe pays for them, the already economically distressed leading European governments are wondering how they can foot a €100bn a year bill that continuing the war in Ukraine will cost. In December the EU raised a €90bn loan to keep the government in Kyiv afloat, two thirds of which will be spent on weapons, but even that was around €50bn short of what the war is expected to cost over the next two years. Moreover, Europe’s defence industry will struggle to produce the number and quality of weapons Ukraine is so desperate for – more air defence ammo topping the list.

Zelenskiy appeared to be facing harsh realities when he said earlier this month that the war may be over by this summer – an unusual statement as the Ukraine’s president is usually reluctant to ascribe timelines to comments like this.

French President Emmanuel Macron was the first to say it outloud, calling for Europe to open direct talks with the Kremlin. He was followed soon after by Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni who agreed that the time had come for direct negotiations. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz did an abrupt about face a week later, calling Russia a "European" country and saying Berlin was also open to direct negotiations.

Maybe most surprising of all was former Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who added his voice to the growing cacophony on January 17, saying Western countries should "talk to Russia as a neighbour."

"We need to discuss ending the fighting in Ukraine with Russia just as we, the United States, and other countries are doing... We need to talk to Russia as a neighbor," he said in an interview with Der Spiegel magazine.

Unity within the EU in its support of Ukraine and opposition to Russia is crumbling. Ukraine fatigue has built up steadily as it becomes increasingly obvious that Ukraine will not be able to win a military victory against Russia.

Add to that there is a certain ennui amongst EU leaders to the fact that as the US-sponsored peace talks got underway in earnest in December with the peace plan thrashed out between US envoys and Putin in a Moscow meeting on December 3 where the EU suggestions were entirely ignored. Part of the motivation for calling for direct talks is to reinject European interests into the dialogue, although the Kremlin is unlikely to welcome engaging in the negotiations. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said in the last month that he sees Europe as the biggest obstacle to doing a peace deal.

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

EVITA OF UKRAINE


COMMENT: Tymoshenko back in play as Ukrainian parliamentary politics returns to the fore

COMMENT: Tymoshenko back in play as Ukrainian parliamentary politics returns to the fore
Pushed to the sidelines of Ukrainian politics for several years, NABU accusations of vote-buying have once again shoved firebrand opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko back into the spotlight of Ukrainian domestic politics. / bne IntelliNews
By bne IntelliNews January 20, 2026

Orange Revolution firebrand Yulia Tymoshenko’s sudden re-emergence at the centre of Ukraine’s political scene after she was caught up in a vote-selling scandal  has seen her return to the heart of Ukrainian politics.

“The Tymoshenko scandal reflects the fact that the centre of Ukrainian politics is once again shifting to parliament,” wrote political analyst Konstantin Skorkin in a recent commentary for Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “The fight for parliamentary deputies’ votes is heating up again, and Ukraine’s domestic political crisis is entering a new phase.”

Once a dominant figure in Ukraine’s early post-independence years, Tymoshenko’s career trajectory mirrored the country’s own political evolution. She was a successful businessperson in the 1990s, earning a fortune from gas trading at a time when she also severed as Ukraine’s gas minister, earning her the moniker “the gas princess.”

Then she moved into politics thanks to her association with prime minister and now convicted criminal Pavlo Lazarenko. She became a fixture in the opposition during the Kuchma and Yanukovych presidencies, before she and her trademark crown braid became an icon of the Orange Revolution. In the new post revolution government she achieved her political pinnacle, twice serving as prime minister and imprisoned on two occasions. Yet after she was released from jail after the EuroMaidan revolution in 2014 she political star set and she became the largely irrelevant head of a small Rada fraction, the Fatherland Party that hold less than a dozen seats in parliament. She ran in the 2019 presidential elections but came a distant third to the now Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Since then Zelenskiy’s Servant of the People party has held an absolute majority in parliament and dominates domestic politics.

Following Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, Tymoshenko struggled to find footing in Ukraine’s wartime consensus. “She became critical of the government, condemning the new mobilisation law and the restrictions on consular services for Ukrainians abroad,” Skorkin observed. Adopting the socially conservative platform, styling herself as a Ukrainian Trump, Tymoshenko positioned herself as a populist voice against liberal reforms, opposing cannabis legalisation and what she termed a “gender agenda.”

In the summer of 2025, she led a campaign to curtail the powers of Ukraine’s anti-corruption bodies, branding the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) that is now investigating her for vote-buying as an agent of “external control.” She supported Zelenskiy’s controversial attempt to gut Ukraine’s anti-corruption reforms on July 22 with Law 21414, which sparked the first anti-government demonstrations since the start of the war with Russia.

Her refusal to support legislation restoring NABU’s authority following presidential intervention drew accusations of obstructionism. “Tymoshenko’s reaction came across as a case of sour grapes among the old elites,” Skorkin wrote, “unhappy with real efforts to fight the corruption that had long plagued the country.”

But when she was accused of corruption, accompanied by some very damning video and audio tapes, released by NABU, she hit back by accusing Zelenskiy personally of corruption – a sentiment that will resonate with voters. In the tapes, a voice alleged to be Tymoshenko’s offers deputies $10,000 per month for their votes and speaks of plans to “overthrow the majority.”

The recent charges against Tymoshenko—bribery and attempted vote-buying—come amid what Skorkin described as “a large-scale purge of the elites,” triggered by the publication of the so-called Mindich tapes in late 2025 that are at the centre of the Energoatom corruption scandal. Investigations have already reached members of the ruling party, including Zelensky’s associate Yuriy Kisel.

Her apparent goal, according to Skorkin, was to undermine Zelensky’s single-party control of the Verkhovna Rada, which has been showing signs of fragmentation. “The opposition wants to drive a deeper wedge into this cracked monolith,” Skorkin wrote, pointing to a failed vote on a proposed reshuffle and growing speculation of a “parliamentary coup” that could curtail presidential powers.

In line with the charges, Tymoshenko has been barred from leaving the Kyiv region and from communicating with 66 deputies. Bail has been set at UAH33mn ($760,000). Yet typically for the grandstanding Tymoshenko, even under legal pressure she used the court hearing as a political platform. “Trials and imprisonment have helped Tymoshenko rise to the top of Ukrainian politics on more than one occasion,” Skorkin noted.

Whether that strategy can succeed again is uncertain. “It will be difficult to repeat those past successes given how much time has passed and how much the country has changed since then,” Skorkin concluded. “Still, the Tymoshenko case demonstrates that the anti-corruption earthquake last fall has sent such powerful shock waves through Ukrainian politics that it has brought to the surface those who dwelt in its depths—those who may yet play a role in a battle in which they had already been written off.”

Thursday, January 15, 2026

 

Putin attempting to freeze Ukraine into surrender

Putin attempting to freeze Ukraine into surrender
Putin is using Ukraine's freezing winters as a weapon. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin January 15, 2026

Russia is trying to freeze Ukraine into submission. As temperatures plunge to -20°C in Kyiv, the Armed Forces of Russia (AFR) has stepped up its barrage of drones and ballistic missiles to take out key heating and power infrastructure. Half of Ukraine’s capital is now in subzero darkness and the city’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko, said that anyone with somewhere else to go should leave. He is not the only one. Other governors in frontline regions have said the same.

The attacks are country wide. Russian forces launched another massive overnight drone attack on Zelenskiy’s home town of Kryvyi Rih on January 13, knocking out heat to more than 700 apartment buildings and cutting electricity to over 45,000 customers as temperatures dropped to –7°C, local officials said.

“Russia is attacking energy infrastructure in Kyiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia regions. Russia deliberately plans these attacks during very cold weather to maximize the damage and bring more suffering to Ukrainian civilians,” Anton Gerashchenko, advisor to Ukraine’s Minister of Internal Affairs and founder of the Institute of the Future, said in a social media post this week.

The extreme cold temperatures of deep winter have arrived, with the mercury falling below -15°C. Russia has been attacking Ukraine’s energy infrastructure for more than two years, but the Kremlin has been waiting for the icy Siberian airmasses to settle over Ukraine, as they do every year, and is now scaling up the attacks. The targets have changed too. The non-nuclear generating capacity is already largely destroyed, but now the AFR is hitting the infrastructure – things like power substations, gas pipelines and hot water pumping stations. In just one attack this week, Russia used over 300 drones, 18 ballistic and seven cruise missiles to target energy that deprived people of power, water, and heating on January 13, according to Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha.

“Russia is deliberately trying to inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction of the Ukrainian people—which falls exactly under the definition of Article II (c) of the Genocide Convention,” Sybiha said following the barrage against Kyiv.

Weaponizing the weather

Turning off the lights in Ukraine has been a long-standing strategy. Putin is using his ability to take out civilian energy infrastructure with highly accurate and powerful guided missiles as a tool in his ongoing efforts to force Ukraine to capitulate on Russian terms. While the damage has been dramatic and devastating, in typical Putin-style it has also been incremental. Putin has been proceeding step by step, starting with the generating capacity, but ignoring the substations until now.

Russia began to target the power sector in 2023 and over the next two years it destroyed virtually all of Ukraine’s non-nuclear generating capacity. Off limits for obvious reasons, the nuclear power stations have been left alone and account for about half of Ukraine’s generating capacity, but the substations that distribute their power have also been largely untouched so far.

With reduced output, last winter was harsh but between the repairs, imports, temporary container-sized generators largely supplied by USAID, and the surviving nuclear capacity the country managed to struggle through the season.

As deep winter arrives this year, the situation is already much more difficult. Since a missile war began this summer and Russia’s military production went into surplus, the AFR has changed tactics. It now flies in waves of hundreds of drones to denigrate air defences that are followed by a few powerful ballistic missiles that can destroy a target completely.

Power plants have been made vulnerable by the Energoatom corruption scandal. While Ukrenergo, the state-owned thermal utilities operator, built some 70 highly effective concrete bunkers to protect its infrastructure, a similar plan for nuclear power infrastructure under the control of Energoatom was never implemented, when Zelenskiy’s close associates siphoned off $100mn in a kickback scheme that was supposed to be spent on defences. At the same time the $1bn in foreign aid for the power sector raised by Ukrenergo fell away to almost nothing partly due to corruption in the sector.

The AFR is now capitalising on this weakness and has been targeting key energy and transport infrastructure that can knock out the power in entire cities and regions. Ukraine’s key ultra-high voltage 750kV substations are especially vulnerable, which provide power to whole cities and act as the regional interconnectors. So far, Russia has deliberately avoided hitting these hard to protect and hard to fix substations, but in the last two months the 750kV substations in Sumy and Odesa were knocked out leaving both in darkness for over a week.

Similar substation attacks are now being reported in Kyiv and other cities. A third of Kyiv is now without power or heat for several days, which has sparked limited public protests as the city starts to be uninhabitable, according to local reports.

Siberian airmasses arrive in Ukraine

Russia has clearly been waiting for the coldest part of the year to scale up its attack. A large cold mass of icy air from Siberia is now trapped over the country and temperatures have dropped below -20°C. In Ukraine, Belarus, and western Russia, temperatures will regularly drop to around −20°C over the next at least 14 days, according to the Ventusky metrological service, while daytime highs will be only around −10°C. These are below-average temperatures which, according to current forecasts, could persist throughout the entire month of January.

Families in Soviet-era apartment blocks have taken to huddling together in the smallest rooms to try and keep warm as internal temperatures fall to 13°C-15°C and will fall further. The “invincibility points” are back in use – small huts set up in the courtyard of apartment complexes where locals can go to warm up, cook some food and recharge their phones that were deployed after two years of the war during the first big missile barrages in January 2024.

With no prospect of the heating being restored soon, apartment block management have drained the water from central heating pipes to avoid them freezing and bursting. The bitterly cold weather is also shutting down supermarkets and offices.

“The humanitarian crisis in Kyiv and the region is intensifying amid prolonged power outages and severe winter conditions, Iuliia Mendel, Zelenskiy’s former press secretary said on social media. “​For the second consecutive day, photos and videos of empty store shelves—particularly bread—have been circulating widely on social media. Several supermarket chains have partially or temporarily closed locations due to extended blackouts and equipment failures in sub-zero temperatures.”

Ukraine's retail chains are starting to collapse. More and more stores cannot open or are suspending operations indefinitely after their equipment -- primarily refrigeration units -- cannot withstand the constant power surges and outages. The surges lead to breakdowns, product spoilage, and massive losses, leaving the urban populations unable to meet their basic needs. Photos of empty shelves are starting to pop up on social media as residents hunt for bread and other basics.

Public transport remains severely disrupted too. Kyiv’s metro is operating with delays or reduced service in many areas, while ground transport struggles with snow, ice, and power issues.

In some districts of Kyiv, residents are blocking roads in protest over multi-day blackouts. Windows in apartment blocks are blown out by constant missile and drone attacks but go unrepaired. In other cases, workers turn up at their offices only to go home again in a few hours thanks to the intense cold, reports Mendel.

A large-scale humanitarian crisis is brewing. If Russia’s campaign continues then western governments have been warned to prepare for a fresh wave of refugees fleeing the freezing conditions, bne IntelliNews diplomatic sources say.

 
 

Negotiating tactics

“Production of missiles is way up and interception rates are way down…” says journalist and bne IntelliNews columnist Leonid Ragozin. “Ukrainian air defence forces downed seven of 25 missiles fired by Russia last night. Quite a contrast with earlier in the war when all but a few missiles would be shut down, at least as per official reports.”

For the last two days, people in multiple cities have been without electricity, water, or sewage services, pushing living conditions to a critical brink. Thousands of generators are struggling to provide enough electricity to maintain even the most basic level of normalcy in people's lives as demand starts to overwhelm small-sale generating capacity.

Putin is attempting to freeze Ukraine into submission and has been using his ability to destroy the heating as a negotiating tool. Last summer, when there were hopes that a peace deal could be done after the Alaska summit on August 15, there was a preliminary follow up meeting between a Ukrainian and Russian delegation in Qatar – the first time officials from the warring parties agreed to meet since the failed 2022 Istanbul meeting. Top of the agenda was a limited offer to halt Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s energy sector.

Putin tends to telegraph his intentions well in advance, although this is not widely appreciated. He made it clear in his Munich Security Conference (MSC) speech in 2007 that he was irked with Nato’s eastward expansion and that “Russia will push back” if it was not stopped, but he didn’t start modernising his army until 2012.

Around the same time, Putin ordered CBR governor Elvia Nabiullina to build up Russia’s hard currency reserves, increase the share of gold and start selling US treasury bills – a process that took years to complete. Putin plans for the long-term.

With the economy sanction-proofed, things went up a level in 2021. In the showdown with the EU over Ukraine, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned Europe what was coming in his “new rules of the game” speech delivered in February 2021. He warned Russia would break off diplomatic relations with Europe unless the 2014 sanctions were ended. That was followed by breaking off diplomatic relations with Nato in October the same year – another signal - and the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs eight-point list of demands in December in 2021. The Kremlin massed troops on Ukraine’s border twice ahead of the actual invasion in 2021 and again in 2022 before actually invading.

What has surprised with the war in Ukraine is when Putin finally loses patience, he has chosen the most extreme and dramatic escalation option on the table – starting with the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 itself, which few commentators expected from the otherwise cautious and slow-moving Putin.

Now Putin is employing the same step by step escalation of missile attacks on energy infrastructure. He has had the ability to knock out power from the start, but it is being done incrementally and he has waited until deep winter arrives to make it more effective.

The Qatar talks were an olive branch, albeit all the Kremlin was looking for was a capitulation on its own terms. They were called off after Russia launched its largest missile barrage against Kyiv since the start of the war a few days before. Typically, Russia launches increased attacks on Ukraine each time they are scheduled to meet, but in this case it appears Putin overplayed his hand and scuppered the first real attempt by the two sides to meet and negotiate.

Now the peace talks appear to have stalled again and so Putin is turning the screws on Kyiv by ratcheting up the energy attacks. A lot of progress was made in the last quarter, starting with the Witkoff-Dmitriev plan, named after its reported authors, US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, Kirill Dmitriev, who started meeting in October. That effort culminated in the Moscow meeting on December 3 between the US representatives and Putin and a 27-point peace plan (27PPP) that Russia said it was largely happy with.

However, following the Berlin meeting on December 14-15 and the Mar-a-Lago meeting between Trump and Zelenskiy on December 28 Ukraine came up with an alternative 20-point peace plan (20PPP) submitted to the Kremlin on Christmas Eve, which has since been largely rejected. Both Trump and Putin were pressuring Zelenskiy to do the deal at Mar-a-Lago, but without real Article 5-like security guarantees from his partners, Zelenskiy refused.

US President Donald Trump said that Ukraine, not Russia, is holding up a potential peace deal, in sharp contrast to rhetoric from European allies who have consistently said that Moscow has little interest in ending the war in Ukraine, Reuters reported on January 15. 

"I think [Putin] is ready to make a deal. I think Ukraine is less ready to make a deal," Trump said. Asked why US-led talks have so far failed to resolve Europe’s biggest land conflict since World War II, Trump replied: "Zelenskiy,"

Talks are continuing at the level of foreign ministries and amongst the envoys, but little progress has been made. The talks appear to have stalled again.

Cracks in Bankova’s position appearing

Putin’s tactics appear to be having an effect. Zelenskiy is putting a brave face on the deteriorating situation. “Russia must understand that the cold will not help win the war,” he said this week. But he admitted that the main target of this week’s strikes was again energy infrastructure - generation facilities and substations – and the significant destruction of residential and civil infrastructure. Dnipropetrovsk, Zhytomyr, Zaporizhia, Kyiv, Odesa, Sumy, Kharkiv and Donetsk regions were all simultaneously under attack. Hundreds of thousands of households are without electricity, according to the president.

Cracks in Bankova’s resistance are appearing. Zelenskiy’s call for Europe to rush stockpiled ammo to Kyiv this week smacks of growing desperation. This month Zelenskiy also said that the war might be over by summer – an unusual statement as Zelenskiy typically doesn’t give timelines.

In an interview, Ukraine’s former Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, also said that Ukrainians are ready to accept territorial concessions to end the military conflict with Russia, something that Bankova has been adamant it won’t agree to until recently.

"What everyone sees in ratings and opinion polls is one story. But what people say on the streets and in their kitchens is quite another. When I travelled to villages and started talking to people outside of gas stations, I honestly stopped reading opinion polls,” Kuleba said. “My impression is this: if people are told, 'This is what we need to give up, but it will all stop, and this is what we'll get in return: a strong army, billions for reconstruction, and EU membership,'… I think this is a story that society will be ready to accept. Provided, of course, that it doesn't say anywhere that we are finally and irrevocably giving up any territories forever," Kuleba said.

So far, Zelenskiy is toughing a bad and worsening situation out. However, with temperatures in homes plummeting and shops emptying with at least two or three months of winter still to go, the question is how long can Ukraine’s population hold out.




Trump says Zelenskiy, not Putin, is holding up a Ukraine peace deal


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy listens to US President Donald Trump, after Trump said that Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed willingness to help Ukraine "succeed", during a press conference at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club, in Palm Beach, Florida, US, Dec 28, 2025.
PHOTO: Reuters file

January 15, 2026 


WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump told Reuters that Ukraine — not Russia — is holding up a potential peace deal, rhetoric that stands in marked contrast to that of European allies, who have consistently argued Moscow has little interest in ending its war in Ukraine.

In an exclusive interview in the Oval Office on Wednesday (Jan 14), Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin is ready to wrap up his nearly four-year-old invasion of Ukraine. Zelenskiy, the US president said, was more reticent.

"I think he's ready to make a deal," Trump said of the Russian president. "I think Ukraine is less ready to make a deal."

Asked why US-led negotiations had not yet resolved Europe's largest land conflict since World War Two, Trump responded: "Zelenskiy."

Trump's comments suggested renewed frustration with the Ukrainian leader. The two presidents have long had a volatile relationship, though their interactions seem to have improved over Trump's first year back in office.

At times, Trump has been more willing to accept Putin's assurances at face value than the leaders of some US allies, frustrating Kyiv, European capitals and US lawmakers, including some Republicans.

In December, Reuters reported that US intelligence reports continued to warn that Putin had not abandoned his aims of capturing all of Ukraine and reclaiming parts of Europe that belonged to the former Soviet empire. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard disputed that report at the time.
'Having a hard time getting there'

After several fits and starts, US-led negotiations have been centred in recent weeks on security guarantees for a post-war Ukraine to ensure that Russia does not invade it again after a potential peace deal. In broad terms, US negotiators have pushed Ukraine to abandon its eastern Donbas region as part of any accord with Russia.

Ukrainian officials have been deeply involved in recent talks, which have been led on the US side by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law. Some European officials have cast doubt on the likelihood of Putin agreeing to some terms recently hashed out by Kyiv, Washington and European leaders.

Trump told Reuters he was not aware of a potential upcoming trip to Moscow by Witkoff and Kushner, which Bloomberg reported earlier on Wednesday.

Asked if he would meet Zelenskiy at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, next week, Trump said he would but implied no plans were set.

"I would — if he's there," Trump said. "I'm going to be there."

Asked why he believed Zelenskiy was holding back on negotiations, Trump did not elaborate, saying only: "I just think he's, you know, having a hard time getting there."

Zelenskiy has publicly ruled out any territorial concessions to Moscow, saying Kyiv has no right under the country's constitution to give up any land.


World

How Russia's and Ukraine's Neighbors See Them

by Benedict Vigers and Galina Zapryanova

This article is part of a series on global leadership approval ratings. Read more on approval of the U.S. and China among NATO countries and on EU approval among its member states.

LONDON — Nearly four years after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, neither country’s leadership earns high approval in its own backyard, and Ukraine’s slight edge has faded.

Across 25 countries in Eastern and Southern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, a median of 24% of adults approved of Ukraine’s leadership in 2025, down slightly from 27% in 2024. Approval of Russia’s leadership stood at 22%, mostly unchanged from the previous year.

Gallup has measured approval of Ukraine’s leadership throughout the region since 2024, while it has tracked views of Russia’s leadership since 2007. Russia’s current 22% average approval rating is marginally higher than where it stood after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At that time, regional approval of Russia had fallen to 19% from 31% in 2021. It has hovered near 20% ever since. Russia’s current approval rating is less than half of what it was at its highest point in 2008, when it stood at 45%.

Median approval of Ukraine’s leadership across the region has inched downward since 2024, from 27% to 24%. This mostly reflects sharp declines in Kazakhstan (down 16 percentage points), Romania and Georgia (both down 10 points) since 2024, while approval has been steadier elsewhere.

Clear Regional Divisions in Allegiances to Kyiv, Moscow

The region shows significant divides in relative approval of Kyiv and Moscow. Ten countries favor Kyiv (meaning their approval of Ukraine’s leadership exceeds their approval of Russia’s by at least 10 percentage points), eight are more aligned with Moscow, and seven show no clear preference — a picture similar to 2024.

The Baltic states show the strongest support for Ukraine over Russia, led by Lithuania (66-point gap), Latvia (52 points) and Estonia (51 points). Central Asia leans heavily toward Russia, with Tajikistan showing a 58-point gap and Kyrgyzstan 50 points. Four countries where Russia leads show gaps in approval exceeding 20 points. By contrast, all 10 countries favoring Kyiv do so. Countries with no clear preference, including Romania, Slovakia, Moldova, Greece and Hungary, cluster in Southern and Eastern Europe.

These regional allegiances reflect a mixture of broader historical ties and economic interests. In the Baltics, Ukraine’s struggle is often seen as their own, and they view Russia’s military actions as a potential threat to their sovereignty.

On the other hand, countries in Central Asia share close economic, cultural and media ties with Russia. Many Central Asian migrants work in Russia and send remittances home, boosting their national economies.

Countries in Southern and Eastern Europe, where there is no clear lead in approval, have historical ties and economic dependencies with both the European Union and Russia. The economic pain of decoupling from Russian energy continues to weigh on the region. At the same time, many of these countries are deeply integrated within the EU, and EU leadership approval is higher than that of both Russia and Ukraine.

Significant Political Divides in Key EU Countries Hungary and Slovakia

Although their populations offer low approval of both Russia’s and Ukraine’s leadership, EU member states Slovakia and Hungary have been the bloc’s most vocal opponents of military support for Kyiv.

Led by Prime Ministers Robert Fico and Viktor Orban, respectively, these nations are the most aligned with the Kremlin’s positions, international networks and economic interests. Because many EU decisions regarding sanctions and aid require unanimity, Slovakia and Hungary have the power to delay or dilute actions aimed at bolstering Ukraine.

In both countries, views of Ukraine and Russia are sharply divided along partisan lines. Supporters of Fico’s Direction Party are nearly three times as likely to approve of Moscow (38%) as Kyiv (14%), while supporters of the opposition Progressive Slovakia Party are much more approving of Kyiv (45%) than Moscow (3%).

The Russia-Ukraine divide runs deeper in Hungary, where a majority of Orban’s Fidesz Party supporters approve of Russia’s leadership (55%), compared with only 3% who approve of Ukraine’s. By contrast, 41% of those aligned with the opposition TISZA Party approve of Kyiv, while 13% approve of Moscow.

These partisan gaps help explain why EU support for Ukraine remains contested in some member states. Hungary and Slovakia have delayed EU sanctions on Russia and questioned military aid to Ukraine. Supporters of the parties currently in power (Direction, Fidesz) are largely aligned with this more favorable stance toward Russia, giving their leaders more domestic backing to resist EU consensus. But elections could shift these positions quickly. Hungary votes in April 2026, with polls forecasting a close race between Fidesz and TISZA.

Bottom Line

As the war in Ukraine continues, Kyiv and Moscow earn similar approval ratings from the wider region, with a slight slip in approval of Kyiv over the past year. However, relative approval of the two countries’ leadership varies considerably by geography, with the Baltics leaning heavily toward Kyiv, Central Asia favoring Moscow, and several Southern and Eastern European nations not clearly aligned with either.

Many efforts have been made to bring the war to an end in recent months, with U.S. President Donald Trump recently hosting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Florida to discuss options. This concluded with Trump acknowledging that some “thorny issues” remain unresolved. However, if the war does end in the near future, regional approval ratings could factor into the regional political landscape Ukraine faces as it rebuilds, as well as which countries fall into Kyiv’s or Moscow’s orbit in the years to come.

Stay up to date with the latest insights by following @Gallup on X and on Instagram.

For complete methodology and specific survey dates, please review Gallup's Country Data Set details. Learn more about how the Gallup World Poll works.


















An Archive of material relating to Nestor Makhno and the Makhnovshchina.

Makhno was a Ukrainian anarchist revolutionary and the commander of an independent anarchist army in Ukraine from 1917–21.


Oct 24, 2019 ... History of the Makhnovist movement, 1918-1921 ; Contributor: Internet Archive ; Language: English ; Author (alternate script): Аршинов, П ; Item ...