Sunday, November 16, 2025

'A day of shame': Protesters bash Trump's 'Charlotte's Web' deportation sting

Robert Davis
November 16, 2025 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: National Guard members walk at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Broadview facility in Chicago, Illinois, U.S., October 9, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon/File Photo

President Donald Trump's administration conducted an immigration crackdown on Sunday in Charlotte, North Carolina, that some protesters described as "causing unnecessary fear and uncertainty."

The Trump administration announced on Saturday that it was "surging" immigration agents into Charlotte as part of an operation it dubbed "Charlotte's Web." Homeland Security official Tricia McLaughlin said that the operation was being conducted because local law enforcement was not honoring DHS' detention requests for more than 1,400 people.

The actions generated outrage and protests on Sunday, according to reports.

An advocacy group called Siembra NC decried the government’s actions as “a day of shame," according to a report by The Charlotte Observer. They added that more immigrants were arrested on Saturday than on any other day in the city's history.

People who witnessed immigration agents arresting community members also spoke out. For instance, two men were arrested outside of Dany’s Supermarket off The Plaza after they tried using an ATM there, The Observer reported.

“They were behaving," Grover Stinson, who witnessed the event, told the outlet. They weren’t doing anything,”

Read the entire report by clicking here.


Dozens reportedly arrested in Charlotte, North Carolina, amid immigration crackdown

Issued on: 17/11/2025 - FRANCE24

US President Donald Trump has ramped up immigration arrrests in Democratic-led cities in recent months in Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington. This weekend federal agents made arrests in the Decmocratic-run city of Charlotte in North Carolina. Nicholas Rushworth tells us the latest.




At least seven faith leaders arrested at Broadview ICE facility protest

(RNS) — 'I've got bruises all over my body,' the Rev. Michael Woolf, who was thrown to the ground and arrested by police, told RNS.


The Rev. Michael Woolf, center, is pulled from a group of demonstrators by police officers outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Broadview, Illinois, Nov. 14, 2025.(Video screen grab)


Jack Jenkins
November 15, 2025
RNS


(RNS) — In video recorded on Friday (Nov. 14) outside the embattled U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview, Illinois, the Rev. Michael Woolf stands alongside fellow protesters, fiddling awkwardly with his backpack as faith leaders and other protesters chant slogans at a line of police officers. A moment later, one officer can be seen walking forward, grabbing Woolf by the wrist and yanking.

Demonstrators attempted to hold on to Woolf, who was wearing a clerical collar, but four officers wrenched him from the crowd and tossed him to the ground. After turning him onto his stomach, officers proceeded to arrest Woolf, and removed him to the Cook County Sheriff’s Office in Maywood, Illinois.

“I’ve got bruises all over my body,” Woolf, an American Baptist minister who is pastor of Lake Street Church of Evanston, Illinois, told Religion News Service. He was speaking in his first interview since being released Friday afternoon after about seven hours in custody.

Woolf said when he asked the arresting officers to loosen the plastic handcuffs that were causing his hands to go numb, an officer replied: “Nobody wants to talk to you — shut the f–k up.”

“It’s part of the dehumanizing nature of it, and it gives me a lot of clarity around what’s happening here,” said Woolf, who has been active in protests against ICE. “It’s really a spiritual emergency.”

Footage and images of Woolf’s arrest were shared widely on the internet on Friday, drawing attention to the demonstration at the ICE facility, where protests have become commonplace in recent weeks. Organizers said at least 100 faith leaders of various faiths and denominations came to the Broadview facility, providing a climax to religious pushback to “Operation Midway Blitz,” a mass deportation effort that has rounded up hundreds of undocumented immigrants and other Chicago residents since it was launched in September. Recent reports say that many immigration agents who have been operating in the city, particularly U.S. Border Patrol officers, are being transferred to Charlotte, North Carolina.

Cook County Police said 21 people were arrested at the demonstration, all but one of whom were charged with “Obstruction/Disorderly Conduct/Pedestrian Walking on Highways.” Participants said at least seven of those arrested were faith leaders from Presbyterian, Lutheran, Baptist, Unitarian Universalist, and Jewish traditions.

The Department of Homeland Security’s X feed seemed to mock the protest participants in an X post on Friday, saying, “Womp womp, cry all you want. These criminal illegal aliens aren’t getting released.”

The post called the demonstrators “violent rioters” and “imbecilic morons” who need to “get a job.”

Asked about the DHS statement, Woolf said he and other protesters were “demanding constitutional and due process rights” for detainees, adding, “I believe that justice will come in this life or the next.”

“I know which side I choose. I choose the gospel,” he added.

“This is our job,” said the Rev. Kristina Sinks, a United Methodist pastor who helped organize a worship service, in reply to the DHS post. Sinks also rejected the suggestion that demonstrators were violent. She later explained via text message that she believes it is the job of clergy to “advocate for the oppressed, the vulnerable, and those dehumanized by any forces of evil and oppression.”

Sinks added: “Why does DHS feel threatened by clergy praying? What are they hiding?”

In a statement sent to RNS Saturday evening, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin dismissed inquiries about remarks from Woolf and Sinks as a “ridiculous line of questioning.” She then insisted that “you can clearly see rioters attacking police” in “the video.” McLaughlin did not specify which video she was referring to.

“We will always condemn lawlessness and violence against our law enforcement,” McLaughlin said. “We urge faith leaders across the country to do the same.”

Organizers called the protest one of the largest in a series of demonstrations at the Broadview site, many of which have been led by religious leaders who allege federal authorities are mistreating the detainees at the facility. The treatment of the detainees is the subject of an ongoing class-action lawsuit.

Sinks said faith leaders began Friday with a multi-faith service outside the Broadview facility to “bear witness to the suffering inside the facility.” The participants held daily hygiene products, bread, and clean water to “symbolize needs not met” by the government agents who run the facility.

Faith leaders from various traditions — Christian, Jewish, Hindu and others — then presented police with a letter from clergy offering spiritual care to the detainees. Organizers, Sinks said, sent DHS an identical letter a week before.

Offers of pastoral care and Communion for detainees at the facility have been offered multiple times, only to be rebuffed, as they were on Friday. Religious leaders have raised the issue as a religious freedom concern, with U.S. Catholic bishops, backed by comments by Pope Leo XIV, condemning authorities for depriving detainees of sacraments — something some religious leaders have been allowed to do in the past.

After clergy were denied access again on Friday, MS Now footage from the protest showed Woolf and other faith leaders attempting to approach the facility, marching arm-in-arm. The demonstrators were quickly mobbed by police, who began pushing them back. A short time later, police began arresting demonstrators.

Several faith leaders at the demonstration expressed shock at the intensity of the police response. The Rev. Quincy Worthington, a Presbyterian Church (USA) minister who has been active in protests against ICE and was in the crowd on Friday, said he tried to help up people who had fallen or pushed down who were “being crushed or beaten.”

Similarly, the Rev. Hannah Kardon, a United Methodist minister who was thrown to the ground and arrested at a previous demonstration in Broadview, said in a text message that she saw “overwhelming and unnecessary violence” from “multiple police forces” at the facility.

“I saw knees on necks,” she wrote. “I saw people pulled and dragged. I saw people slammed to the ground. Faith leaders were brutalized today for wanting to offer spiritual care to their stolen neighbors. It was horrific.”

Clergy have been vocal critics of “Operation Midway Blitz” since it began, and have been repeatedly met with force by federal, state and local police forces. At least five local clergy, including Woolf, Kardon and Worthington, say they have been shot with pepper balls fired by Department of Homeland Security forces. Footage of agents shooting the Rev. David Black, a Presbyterian minister from Chicago, in the head with pepper balls was widely shared on social media.

As state and local police have become the main force guarding the facility in recent weeks, activists have accused Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a critic of Trump and his mass deportation policies, of protecting ICE agents.

The treatment of faith-based protesters is part of the class-action lawsuit as well as a separate case that includes Black as a plaintiff. The latter case resulted in a temporary restraining order limiting federal agents’ ability to use violence against protesters, including “religious practitioners.”

Woolf said that after he was arrested, he and other participants continued to pray and worship during the hours they were detained together. They sang songs such as “We Shall Overcome,” and some even recited poetry.

The pastor added he has been reflecting on “the dehumanizing nature” of his experience, but that “the cruelty that goes on at that facility … must be 100 times worse.”

This post has been updated to include a statement from DHS.


Methodist pastors march into courtroom to support 'boring suburban dad' indicted for protesting


CHICAGO (RNS) — ‘If you come for one United Methodist, you have come for all of us,’ said a Chicago area UMC pastor.


Brian Straw holds hands with his wife, Shannon Craig Straw, while leaving the Everett McKinley Dirksen federal courthouse after his arraignment, Nov. 12, 2025, in Chicago. 
(RNS photo/Jack Jenkins)

Jack Jenkins
November 13, 2025
RNS


CHICAGO (RNS) — Like his five fellow defendants, Brian Straw was flanked by supporters as he entered the courtroom at the Everett Dirksen federal courthouse on Wednesday (Nov. 12) for his arraignment on charges related to protests that have taken place for weeks outside an immigrant processing facility in Broadview.

But unlike Straw’s fellow “Broadview Six” defendants, who include Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh and Cook County Board candidate Catherine “Cat” Sharp, his supporters wore clerical collars — because most were United Methodist pastors.

“He’s one of ours,” said the Rev. Lindsey Long Joyce, a pastor at Grace Church of Logan Square, who was among the clergy who showed up at the courtroom, clearly visible among the dozens of supporters of all six defendants.

“In the United Methodist tradition, we have something called connectionalism, which, in this moment, we are saying means: If you come for one United Methodist, you have come for all of us,” said Joyce, who also serves the Northern Illinois UMC conference as a cooperative parish strategist, helping congregations work together to increase their local impact.

Straw, 38, an attorney and trustee of the Village of Oak Park, a Chicago suburb, is the husband of Shannon Craig Straw, who has long worked with liberal-leaning religious groups as a communications adviser and who also accompanied him on Wednesday.

The Broadview Six case is focused on confrontations between federal agents and protesters at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview, just west of Chicago. After President Donald Trump’s administration launched “Operation Midway Blitz,” a mass deportation effort, in the city, religious leaders joined the resistance, gathering at the Broadview ICE detention center on a daily basis.

Straw and his fellow defendants were arraigned Wednesday on charges that stem from a Sept. 26 protest outside Broadview. According to the indictment, defendants surrounded an ICE vehicle attempting to leave the facility, banged on the hood and damaged it in various ways. The driver was then forced to drive slowly, the indictment alleges.

Straw, like all of the defendants, pleaded not guilty.


People demonstrate against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions and policy outside the Everett McKinley Dirksen federal courthouse, Nov. 12, 2025, in Chicago. (RNS photo/Jack Jenkins)

At one point during the proceeding, Straw’s lawyer challenged a request that his client turn over his passport, insisting that Straw, a “boring suburban dad” by Straw’s own description, wasn’t “going anywhere.” He noted that part of the reason he participated in protests outside the Broadview facility was because he opposed the government demanding “papers” from immigrants.

Straw’s lawyer said that while immigrants detained by ICE can’t “stand up to the government,” Straw can.

After the judge explained she would not require defendants to turn over their passports, the overflow room burst into applause.

The Rev. Betty Jo Birkhahn-Rommelfanger, a retired UMC pastor who felt strongly that the case should be dropped, said she had come in part to register her own objection to the alleged mistreatment of immigrants in the Broadview facility. “These are God’s people that are in that detention center, and they won’t even let religious leaders come in and pray with them, or offer Communion, or in any way give pastoral care,” Birkhahn-Rommelfanger said. “It is just wrong.”

A separate class action lawsuit on behalf of Broadview detainees has been filed, arguing that they are being denied access to religious rites such as Communion.

The clergy who came to support Straw included leaders from other faith traditions, but Joyce said a group of UMC pastors is dedicated to showing support for other Chicago-area Methodists who are facing legal battles amid the administration’s ongoing mass deportation effort.


Kat Abughazaleh, a Democratic candidate for Congress, speaks to media outside the Everett McKinley Dirksen federal courthouse after her arraignment, Nov. 12, 2025, in Chicago. (RNS photo/Jack Jenkins)

Joyce said she and others would show up for immigrant families, as well as for the Rev. Hannah Kardon, a fellow UMC pastor who also showed up to support Straw. Kardon faces an impending court date on state-level charges stemming from her arrest while protesting at the Broadview facility last month.

“Any United Methodist, any of my people who are deported, detained and arrested for standing up to this — I’m going to show up for them, because that’s what faith means to me right now,” Joyce said.

Straw did not comment as he left the courtroom, but he pulled from his pocket a copy of the U.S. Constitution and a New Testament. He opened the latter to a bookmarked passage in the Gospel of Matthew in which Jesus preaches the Beatitudes.



McDonald's core customer base drops by double digits in Trump economy

Lesley Abravanel, 
Alternet
November 16, 2025


Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump works behind the counter during a visit to McDonalds in Feasterville-Trevose, Pennsylvania, U.S. October 20, 2024. 
Doug Mills/Pool via REUTERS

Prices have risen so high at fast food landmark McDonald's under President Donald Trump's leadership that " traffic from one of its core customer bases, low-income households, has dropped by double digits," reports the LA Times.

"The struggle of the Golden Arches — long synonymous with cheap food for the masses — reflects a larger trend upending the consumer economy and making 'affordability' a hot policy topic," writes Suhauna Hussein.

Executives of the fast-food chain say "the higher costs of restaurant essentials, such as beef and salaries, have pushed food prices up and driven away lower-income customers who are already being squeezed by the rising cost of groceries, clothes, rent and child care."

Analyst Adam Josephson says that prices are rising everywhere—especially at McDonald's.

"Happy Meals at McDonald’s are prohibitively expensive for some people, because there’s been so much inflation,” Josephson says.

Josephson and other economists point to Trump's K-shaped economy as the reason for shrinking traffic of low-income consumers.

Meanwhile, all is well for companies catering to higher-income consumers, like Delta Airlines, where data shows that while their main cabin revenue fell 5 percent for the June quarter compared to a year ago, premium ticket sales rose 5 percent, "highlighting the divide between affluent customers and those forced to be more economical," Hussein writes.

The same is happening with luxury brand hotels, where "revenue at brands including Four Seasons, Ritz-Carlton and St. Regis is up 2.9 percent so far this year, while economy hotels saw a 3.1 percent decline for the same period, according to industry tracker CoStar."

“There are examples everywhere you look,” Josephson says.

Consumer credit delinquency rates, Hussein explains, show how badly low-income households are suffering under Trump.

"Households making less than $45,000 annually are seeing 'huge year-over-year increases,' even as delinquency rates for high- and middle-income households have flattened and stabilized," says Rikard Bandebo, chief strategy officer and chief economist at VantageScore.

As rents have increased, the amount families have left over after paying for housing and utilities has fallen to record lows, Hussein notes.

“It’s getting tougher and tougher every month for low-income households to make ends meet,” Bandebo says.

Prices at fast-food restaurants are skyrocketing, too, up 3.2 percent year over year, at a rate higher than inflation “and that’s climbing” according to Marisa DiNatale, an economist at Moody’s Analytics.

“It has always been the case that more well-off people have done better. But a lot of the economic and policy headwinds are disproportionately affecting lower-income households, and [McDonald’s losing low-income customers] is a reflection of that,” DiNatale says.

McDonald's has previously offered budget meals, and tried doing so last year, with a $5 deal for a McDouble or McChicken sandwich, small fries, small soft drink and four-piece McNuggets.

In January it offered a $1 menu item alongside an item bought for full price, and launched Extra Value Meals in early September, but, Hussein writes, it didn't "immediately cut through to customers."

DiNatale says companies are weary of passing along higher costs to customers, saying, "A lot of businesses are saying, we just don’t think consumers will stand for this. [Consumers] have been through years of higher prices, and there’s just very little tolerance for higher prices going forward.

'Simply lying': Nobel economist bashes Trump's 'false' claims on the state of the economy

Robert Davis
November 16, 2025
RAW STORY

A Nobel Prize-winning economist bashed President Donald Trump's "false" claims about the state of the U.S. economy in a new Substack essay published on Sunday.

Paul Krugman, who won the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics for his work on trade theory, argued in the essay that Trump is "simply lying" about the state of the economy. Although data indicate the economy is faring better than popular sentiment might lead someone to believe, Krugman added that there are several warning signs, such as the price of groceries continuing to increase.

"Donald Trump continues to claim that grocery prices are 'way down,'" Krugman wrote. "Yet anyone who does their own food shopping – unlike Trump -- can tell you that Trump’s statement is false."

Krugman added that Trump's economy has induced what's known as a "vibecession," or an economy that feels like it's in a recession to consumers even if economic data doesn't support that conclusion.

"Many observers have compared Trump’s predicament with the problems faced by the Biden administration, whose attempts to highlight good economic data alienated many voters who felt that their concerns weren’t being taken seriously," Krugman added. "In one important way this is false equivalence: Biden and his officials were pointing to actual data that did indeed seem to paint a relatively positive picture of the economy. Trump and company, by contrast, are simply lying."

"But although Biden and his people were honest, while Trump and his people aren’t, it’s true that we now have two presidencies in a row in which Americans are far more negative about the economy than the usual measures would have predicted," he concluded.

Read the entire essay by clicking here.
Maine Senate Candidate Graham Platner Says ‘Nobody Works Hard Enough to Justify $1 Billion’

“I refuse to believe that in a state like Maine where people work as hard as we do here, that it is merely hard work that gets you that kind of success. We all know it isn’t. We all know it’s the structures. It’s the tax code.”


US senatorial candidate from Maine Graham Platner speaks at a town hall at the Leavitt Theater on October 22, 2025 in Ogunquit, Maine. Platner, a veteran of the U.S. Marines and an oyster farmer, is running for the seat held by Republican Sen. Susan Collins.
(Photo by Sophie Park/Getty Images)


Jon Queally
Nov 15, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

Echoing recent viral comments by music superstar Billie Eilish, Maine Democratic candidate for US Senate Graham Planter is also arguing that the existence of billionaires cannot be justified in a world where working-class people with multiple jobs still cannot afford the basic necessities of life.


In video clip posted Friday of a campaign event in the northern town of Caribou from last month, Platner rails against the “structures” of an economy in which billionaires with vast personal fortunes use their wealth to bend government—including the tax code—to conform to their interests while working people are left increasingly locked out of controlling their own destinies, both materially and politically.



‘The Establishment Is Spooked’: Poll Shows Platner With Big Lead Over Mills in Maine Democratic Primary



Another Poll Shows Platner’s Double-Digit Lead Over Establishment Pick Mills in Maine Senate Race

“Nobody works hard enough to justify $1 billion,” the military veteran and oyster farmer told potential voters at the event. “Not in a world where I know people that have three jobs and can’t even afford their rent.”

With audience members nodding their heads in agreement, Platner continued by saying, “I refuse to believe that in a state like Maine, where people work as hard as we do here, that it is merely hard work that gets you that kind of success. We all know it isn’t. We all know it’s the structures. It’s the tax code. That is what allows that money to get accrued.”


The systemic reasons that create vast inequality, Platner continued, are also why he believes that the process of the super wealthy becoming richer and richer at the expense of working people can be reversed.

“The world that we live in today,” he explained, “is not organic. It is not natural. The political and economic world we have did not happen because it had to. It happened because politicians in Washington and the billionaires who write the policies that they pushed made this happen. They changed the laws, and they made it legal to accrue as much wealth and power as they have now.”

The solution? “We need to make it illegal again to do that,” says Platner.

The comments questioning the justification for billionaires to even exist by Platner—though made in early October—echo more recent comments that went viral when spoken by Billie Eilish, a popular musician, who told a roomful of Wall Street movers and shakers in early November that they should do a better job reflecting on their outrageous wealth.

“Love you all, but there’s a few people in here that have a lot more money than me,” Eilish said during an award event in New York City. “If you’re a billionaire, why are you a billionaire? No hate, but yeah, give your money away, shorties.”



While those remarks took a long spin around the internet, Eilish on Friday doubled down on uncharitable billionaires by colorfully calling Elon Musk, who could end up being the world’s first trillionaire, a “fucking pathetic pussy bitch coward” for not donating more of his vast fortune, among the largest in the world, to humanitarian relief efforts.

This week, as Common Dreams reported, a coalition of economists and policy experts called for the creation of a new international body to address the global crisis of inequality.

Like Platner, the group behind the call—including economists like Joseph Stiglitz, Thomas Piketty, Ha-Joon Chang, and Jayati Ghosh—emphasized the inequality-as-a-policy-choice framework. Piketty, who has called for the mass taxation of dynastic wealth as a key part of the solution to runaway inequality, said “we are at a dangerous moment in human history” with “the very essence of democracy” under threat if something is not done.

On the campaign trail in Maine, Platner has repeatedly suggested that only organized people can defeat the power of the oligarchs, which he has named as the chief enemy of working people in his state and beyond. The working class, he said at a separate rally, “have an immense amount of power, but we only have it if we’re organized.”



“No one from above is coming to save us,” Platner said. “It’s up to us to organize, use our immense power as the working class, and win the world we deserve.”



“Department of War” Name Change, Which Isn’t Even Official, Will Cost $2 Billion

The move prioritizes “political theater over responsible governance,” a group of Democrats said in a statement.
November 14, 2025

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth installs a sign reading "Department of War" while onlookers watch in the background.
DOW Rapid Response via X

Honest, paywall-free news is rare. Please support our boldly independent journalism with a donation of any size.

President Donald Trump’s order to rebrand the Department of Defense (DOD) as the “Department of War” this past summer will cost billions of dollars, a new report suggests.

In September, Trump issued an executive order seeking to change the department’s name. Only a bill passed by Congress and signed into law by the president can make the change official, but the order requires all government agencies within the executive branch to refer to the DOD as the Department of War.

“This name sharpens the Department’s focus on our own national interest and our adversaries’ focus on our willingness and availability to wage war to secure what is ours,” Trump’s order states.

But the change — which has no impact on the mission, makeup, or strategies of the DOD — comes with financial consequences.

According to six sources speaking to NBC News — including two senior Republican congressional staffers, two senior Democratic congressional staffers, and two other individuals briefed on the price tag — the name change could cost as much as $2 billion. This includes administrative costs like changing signage (both within the U.S. and around the world), letterheads, employee badges, vast amounts of rewriting coding on websites and internal software, and other items.


Trump’s Escalation Against Venezuela Is Built on the War on Drugs
Every president since Nixon has advanced the policies and institutions that Trump is using to take us to closer to war.  By Greg Grandin , TomDispatch November 13, 2025


Officials at the DOD tried to justify the costs by parroting the language of Trump’s executive order.

“The Department of War is aggressively implementing the name change directed by President Trump, and is making the name permanent,” chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said, adding that a “final cost estimate has not been determined at this time” and that the name change “is essential because it reflects the Department’s core mission: winning wars.”

The U.S. has conducted hundreds of military operations over the past 100 years, including lengthy invasions and occupations in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, as well as its current, and likely illegal, attacks on boats in the Caribbean and Pacific. But the last time the government formally declared war was during WWII — meaning that, definitionally speaking, the idea of changing the DOD’s name to reflect a mission of “winning wars” is flawed.

Several signs have already been changed, including one outside the Pentagon that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth installed himself as part of a photo op this week. But other signs have yet to be removed and replaced, NBC News reported.



Republican members of Congress have submitted legislation to make the name change official, but the administration has not formally pushed for lawmakers to prioritize it.

Democrats have decried the DOD’s informal change to the Department of War as being “both wasteful and hypocritical.”

The move “appears to prioritize political theater over responsible governance, while diverting resources from core national security functions,” a group of Democratic lawmakers wrote in a letter to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in September, requesting information on cost estimates.

The name change signals that the president and his department heads are willing to spend money on pet projects while making cuts elsewhere, ostensibly justifying doing so as a means of reducing federal spending.

But those cuts have come with huge consequences, including detrimental effects on military veterans. Among the plethora of cuts that occurred under the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” earlier this year, reductions in spending within the Department of Veterans Affairs led to “severe and immediate impacts,” including the cancellation of “life-saving cancer trials,” doctors within the department said in a message to the administration at the time.

The cuts also meant veterans would “lose access to therapies” and other important treatment options, those doctors added.
D.E.I.

Trump admin recruits rapper Nicki Minaj in bizarre move to promote military invasion plans


Alexander Will
November 16, 2025 
RAW STORY


Nicki Minaj Anton Oparin / (Shutterstock.com)

The Trump administration has reportedly recruited rapper and musician Nicki Minaj in an apparent effort to back its proposed invasion of Nigeria to stop purported persecution of Christians.



“U.S. envoy to the U.N. Mike Waltz and rap superstar Nicki Minaj will deliver remarks early this week on the persecution of Christians in Nigeria,” wrote Times political reporter Eric Cortellessa Sunday in a social media post on X. “The unexpected collaboration was arranged by Trump advisor Alex Bruesewitz, who will also speak at the Tuesday event.”

Trump first issued a threat to deploy the U.S. military into Nigeria earlier this month on social media, vowing to go in “guns-a-blazing” to “completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.”

Acts of extremist violence have erupted in Nigeria in recent months, which some Republican lawmakers have alleged to be a “genocide” of Christians, or violence that "borders on genocide." Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV) has said that more than 7,000 Christians have been killed in 2025 alone.

However, those numbers have been “widely disputed” among experts, ABC News reported, who’ve said that both Muslims and Christians in Nigeria have been victims of violent attacks, which Al Jazeera described as “multi-faceted” and “driven by ethnic rivalries” and “land disputes,” with religion being “often secondary.”

Trump’s push to invade Nigeria is also alleged to be tied directly to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who, when heading Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, cut aid to the African nation, which New York Times columnist Nick Kristof argued had killed “far more Nigerian Christians than Islamic terrorists” had.



 

Report: USS Ford's Pilots are Studying Up on Venezuelan Air Defenses

Ford
USS Gerald R. Ford (bottom center) with destroyer escorts and a B-52 flyover, Nov. 13 (USN)

Published Nov 14, 2025 11:31 PM by The Maritime Executive


As the carrier USS Gerald R. Ford nears the Caribbean, her air wing's pilots are studying up on the capabilities of Venezuela's air defense network, according to the Washington Post. Talks in the White House continued Friday on whether or not to strike land targets in Venezuela, and President Donald Trump told reporters that afternoon that he had made a decision. "I've already made up my mind. I can't tell you what it will be," Trump told EFE. 

Staffers have presented Trump with multiple strike options, and there are plenty of methods to choose from. Along with USS Ford, the U.S. Navy assets in the region include cruisers USS Lake Erie and USS Gettysburg, destroyers USS Gravely, Mahan, Bainbridge, Winston S. Churchill and Stockdale, and three amphibs with embarked elements of the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit. At least one U.S. attack submarine is likely in the area as well. According to CSIS' calculations, the U.S. Navy now has nearly 300,000 tonnes (displacement) worth of vessels in the Caribbean - a post-Cold War record.

Together, this task force carries a relatively deep magazine of Tomahawk cruise missiles, often favored for a limited strike. Ford carries four squadrons of F/A-18 Super Hornet strike fighters, the standard tool for extended U.S. Navy airstrike campaigns, along with a squadron of E/A-18 Growler electronic attack aircraft for suppression of enemy air defenses. 

Talks in the White House have also included the possibility of special operations missions, the Post reported. Such a foray would likely be limited in scope: the forces currently arrayed in the region are less than what would be expected for a full-scale invasion of a country of Venezuela's size. The invasion of much-smaller Panama in 1989 required 20,000 U.S. troops; at present, the task force has one Marine Expeditionary Unit, which typically totals about 2,200 Marines.

"The long-range firepower available to the United States in the Caribbean is now comparable to levels used in past campaigns of limited scope and duration. There are two likely target sets for such strikes - the cartel facilities and the Maduro regime - with some overlap," assessed CSIS.

Boat strikes continue

In the meantime, the administration continues its campaign of airstrikes on suspected drug smuggling boats. The number has risen to 20 attacks and 80 fatalities as of November 10, and the effort continues. After well-publicized concerns about the legality of the strikes, details about the Justice Department's authorizing brief have begun to emerge in the press. The Wall Street Journal reports that the department's justification for the attacks is based in part on the premise that the boats contain fentanyl, the shipment is intended for the United States market, and that fentanyl constitutes a "chemical weapons threat" that must be intercepted. 

In more than a decade of in-person interdictions in the Caribbean, the U.S. Coast Guard has never reported a discovery of fentanyl aboard a smuggling vessel in the Caribbean or Eastern Pacific - only cocaine, with occasional quantities of marijuana. The overwhelming majority of fentanyl sold in the U.S. is manufactured in Mexico and smuggled over the southern land border.

The Justice Department's brief is intended to convey immunity to U.S. servicemembers who are involved in the operation, but some have begun reaching out for independent legal advice. If the attacks are viewed internationally as unlawful killings of civilians - a position taken by the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights, among others - then servicemembers involved in the activity could be prosecuted overseas, experts warn. 

"If a service member relies on [Department of Justice] immunity, that doesn't mean that a state may not prosecute them for any crimes they commit, or if they travel to another country. If there are allegations that they have committed atrocity crimes, then other countries . . . could invoke their own universal jurisdiction and put them before the national courts of another country," president of the National Institute of Military Justice Lt. Col. Frank Rosenblatt (ret'd, U.S. Army) told PBS.

 

Emergency Statement: Leading British Voices Speak Out Against a Trump-Led War on Venezuela





“We reject this dangerous escalation and call on all who stand for peace to say clearly: No to Trump’s war on Venezuela.”

By Labour Outlook

With Donald Trump increasingly threatening military attacks on Venezuela, a new emergency statement has been launched — backed by leading MPs, writers, trade unionists, and peace campaigners in Britain.

The statement has already been endorsed by MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Richard Burgon; trade union general secretaries Daniel Kebede (NEU), Maryam Eslamdoust (TSSA), and Gawain Little (GFTU); writers Tariq Ali and Victoria Brittain; Labour NEC member Jess Barnard; and Britain’s leading anti-war organisations, CND and the Stop the War Coalition, among others.

Initiated by the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign, it has also won the backing of a wide range of organisations in solidarity with Latin America.

Signatures from across the labour, peace, and progressive movements are being added all the time, and a fuller list of supporters will be released in the coming days.

Read the published statement in full below and add your name here.


EMERGENCY STATEMENT: NO TO TRUMP’S WAR ON VENEZUELA

We are deeply alarmed by the growing threat of a Trump-led war on Venezuela.
In recent weeks, a huge US naval fleet — including warships, bombers, and thousands of troops — has been deployed to the Caribbean, off Venezuela’s coast.

Trump has publicly confirmed that he has authorised the CIA to conduct covert operations in Venezuela. Already, U.S. strikes on Venezuelan small boats — under the pretext of a so-called “war on drugs” — have killed dozens of civilians. Now, Trump has ominously warned that “the land is going to be next.”

This military escalation is part of a long history of US interference in Latin America, where so-called “regime change” operations have caused immense suffering and lasting harm.

There are deep fears that US military intervention in Venezuela could be the first step in a wider regional escalation under Trump’s leadership. Leaders across Latin America have already voiced strong opposition to this military build-up and any foreign intervention.

We reject this dangerous escalation and call on all who stand for peace to say clearly: No to Trump’s war on Venezuela.


Emergency Statement: No to Trump’s War on Venezuela


Jeremy Corbyn – No War with Venezuela

“We must continue to speak up for international law, for self-determination and for human rights for all.”

Jeremy Corbyn MP on the military escalation towards Venezuela.

The United States is mobilising the largest military build-up in the Caribbean in decades. As I write, at least 10,000 US soldiers – on board 10 warships – are patrolling the southern Caribbean coast. That includes a nuclear submarine, several destroyers and a missile cruiser. 

Already, at least seven small boats – accused of transporting drugs – have been bombed. More than thirty people on board have been killed. Donald Trump has authorised the CIA to conduct covert operations inside Venezuela. Now, the US administration is threatening direct military action, accusing President Maduro of leading an organised crime gang. 

We should call these operations what they are: extrajudicial killings. The US has not yet provided any information about the people on board the ships, let alone any evidence that they were transporting drugs. Indeed, it is well known that most of the cocaine does not come from Venezuela on small boats, but from major commercial shipments via the Pacific. 

This is before we have even tested the bogus assumption that, even if these ships were carrying drugs, military action would be the right thing to do. “Every one of those boats is responsible for the death of 25,000 American people, and the destruction of families all over our country”, Trump has said. What utter nonsense. The US administration knows that the War on Drugs has been a total and utter failure. There are several causes of skyrocketing drug use in the United States: poverty, exploitation and money laundering for starters. If the United States wanted to reduce drug consumption, it would start with any of these factors, rather than with extrajudicial killings of people on small boats from Venezuela.

The real reason for this military escalation is clear: regime change. This is not about drugs. This is about the United States reasserting power in its (imperially named) ‘backyard’. It is no coincidence that this action is being taken at a time when countries in Latin and South America are looking increasingly toward BRICS trading partners, particularly China. Military intervention is just one part of a concerted assault on multipolarity. That assault also includes aggressive tariffs on Brazil and sanctions on Cuba, Nicaragua and indeed Venezuela. 

It is telling that Trump’s messianic motivations in Latin America do not extend to Argentina, where a right-wing President has plunged the nation into an unprecedented economic crisis characterised by falling employment, soaring poverty and endless corruption scandals. According to Trump, Venezuela warrants military intervention, Argentina deserves a bail-out.

Any US-supported regime change would lead to a spiral of conflict, misery and violence. Indeed, the instability would likely generate the perfect conditions for the very drug-trafficking the US purports to oppose. A war with Venezuela would be catastrophic for the Venezuelan people, and indeed for the wider region if it is dragged into a regional conflict. That explains why Colombia, Brazil and Barbados have already come out in fierce opposition to US military intervention. The US presence has already had a catastrophic impact, remember, for the unidentified occupants on board the boats that have been destroyed. 

Of course, war is beneficial for some, not least those who are well aware that Venezuela sits on the world’s largest oil reserves. Regime change in Venezuela has been a project of US imperialism ever since Hugo Chavez became president in 1999 and sought to redirect oil revenues away from Venezuela’s elites and toward the people. 

From Vietnam to Iraq, history has taught us that US military intervention only leads to death and destruction. There will be many in our media happy to cheer on war overseas. They will not be the ones to suffer the lasting consequences. 

That’s why we urge the UK government to join the global effort to avoid military intervention and to stand up to US intimidation, interference and imperialism. We must continue to speak up for international law, for self-determination and for human rights for all. I’m not interested in bombs. I’m interested in peace. Say no to a US war on Venezuela!