Sunday, November 09, 2025

 

UK Children’s dental health still very poor despite interventions 




University of Leeds





Children's access to NHS dentists and rates of tooth decay remain very poor despite improvements from national government interventions, oral health experts say. 

Analysis of the latest government data by the Child of the North initiative gives cause for cautious optimism, they say, but the schemes need to be scaled up and strengthened to meet the needs of young people across the country. 

The latest update, titled Improving Children’s Oral Health Update: Integrated Health and Education Solutions, is the seventh to be released as part of the Child of the North’s #ChildrenFirst campaign. It comes one year since the initiative exposed the unacceptable state of children’s oral health, and evidence-based solutions to address it. 

The update commends government action taken in the past year to improve children’s oral health, including introduction of a national supervised toothbrushing programme; plans for the expansion of water fluoridation in the North East of England; consultation on the expansion of the soft drinks industry levy; and bans on both the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks to children and on junk food advertising before 9pm. 

But it shows that despite these improvements, children living in England’s most deprived communities are still over three times as likely to be admitted to hospital for tooth extractions than those living in more affluent areas. 

It also shows: 

  • children living in the most deprived areas of England are more than twice as likely to experience decay as those living in the least deprived areas 

  • 26.9% of five-year-olds have tooth decay 

  • In West Yorkshire, 950 school days were lost for dental reasons across nine schools in one academic year 

Peter Day, Professor of Children's Oral Health in the University of Leeds’ School of Dentistry and Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, co-led the report with Zoe Marshman, Professor in Dental Public Health at the University of Sheffield. 

Both researchers have acted as advisors on the UK Government’s ‘supervised toothbrushing programme’, which aims to reach up to 600,000 children in the most deprived areas. Their research shows that the programme has been rolled out to 240,000 children across schools and nurseries since launching in March this year. 

Professor Day said: “These are exciting times. While disease levels remain stubbornly high—impacting our most vulnerable children and families—the government has taken important steps to implement the policy recommendations outlined in our original report.  

“As we transition into delivery mode, evaluating the impact of these policies is essential. Engagement from schools and nurseries will be critical. We must capture the broader benefits, particularly those affecting education, such as attendance, school readiness, and attainment.” 

Professor Marshman said: “There has been no real improvement in children’s oral health for nearly 10 years and our first national report published in September 2024 called for urgent action. Since then there have been major new ambitious initiatives announced with real potential to address this worrying trend.  

“To achieve this potential requires partnership working across national and local government with child education and health professionals engaging with parents and children.  

“Universities are key to evaluating the impact of these initiatives on dental disease and child wellbeing.” 

#ChildrenFirst builds on a major series of reports produced last year on key topics identified by Northern child health leaders as major issues of concern, including poverty, special educational needs, school attendance and mental health. The reports included evidence-based plans and recommendations for policymakers to help address these issues. 

The 2025 #ChildrenFirst campaign was launched at the National Opportunity Summit hosted in Leeds on Monday 8 September, where Minister Josh MacAlister pledged his support towards building a country that works for all children on his first day as Parliamentary Under-Secretary in the Department for Education. 

The #ChildrenFirst campaign also includes the launch of toolkits designed to help schools, child health workers and local authorities take practical steps to improve the health and wellbeing issues faced by the children and young people in their care. Organisations can download the toolkits free of charge.  

The toolkits are published on a weekly basis over the 12 week period from September to December 2025 alongside the re-released reports in the ‘A country that works for all children and young people’ series, which were produced jointly by Child of the North – a collaboration between the N8 Research Partnership and Health Equity North – and the Centre for Young Lives think tank. 

The toolkits provide evidence and suggestions about how all parties can work together to build a country that works for all children and young people. The goal is to ensure alignment between practitioners on the ground and government’s work on the Opportunity Mission to make certain that every child has the best possible start in life. 

Baroness Anne Longfield, Founder of the Centre for Young Lives, said: “Action taken by Government since the Child of the North and Centre for Young Lives report is welcome. The reality is that far too many children continue to suffer the effects of poor oral health, particularly in areas of higher deprivation. 

“The Government’s proposals for a programme of supervised teeth-brushing in schools is a positive step forward, as is its overall focus on boosting children’s wellbeing. But we know that so much more can be achieved - whether through local oral health strategies, supervised toothbrushing, or supporting healthier food and drink choices. 

“We need to take evidence-based action and develop a national plan to tackle a rotten teeth crisis affecting millions of our children. We are calling on anyone who cares for children and young people to play their part in tackling this issue.” 

Each of the 12 reports is based on in-depth research carried out by academic experts in children and young people’s health and wellbeing from universities across the North of England and beyond, including N8 Research Partnership members Leeds, Manchester, Durham, York, Lancaster, Liverpool, Sheffield and Newcastle, the University of Bradford, and others. 

The policy recommendations made in the reports have helped to shape the Government's Opportunity Mission - the goal of which is to break down the link between a person’s background and their future success, and giving children the best start in life.  

Professor Mark Mon-Williams, who edited the report series, said: The number of children with rotten teeth is a powerful indicator of the wider decay in child wellbeing that is affecting millions of young lives across the UK.   

“This report shows that we can make progress when health, education, and policy work hand in hand. We must now ensure these efforts to improve outcomes for all children reach every community. Good oral health is one of the essential components needed if we are to give every child the best chance to achieve and thrive in school and beyond.” 

The report update, the original report, toolkits and last year's webinar are all available on the N8 Research Partnership website. 

Further information 

Email media enquiries to University of Leeds press officer Lauren Ballinger via l.ballinger@leeds.ac.uk. 
 

University of Leeds 
The University of Leeds is one of the largest higher education institutions in the UK, with more than 40,000 students from about 140 different countries. We are renowned globally for the quality of our teaching and research. 
We are a values-driven university, and we harness our expertise in research and education to help shape a better future for humanity, working through collaboration to tackle inequalities, achieve societal impact and drive change. 
The University is a member of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities, and is a major partner in the Alan Turing, Rosalind Franklin and Royce Institutes www.leeds.ac.uk 
Follow University of Leeds or tag us into coverage: Bluesky | Facebook | LinkedIn | Instagram 

Child of the North 
Child of the North is a partnership between the N8 Research Partnership and Health Equity North and includes partners from across the North of England. Its vision is to develop a platform for collaboration, high-quality research, and policy engagement to support fairer futures for children living in the North of England.  

N8 and N8+ 
The N8 Research Partnership is a collaboration of the eight most research-intensive universities in the North of England: Durham, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield, and York.  

N8+ extends this partnership to include additional collaborators beyond the core eight institutions, uniting broader research expertise and increasing collective influence around shared priorities. Partnerships in Bradford, including with the University of Bradford and Born in Bradford have been instrumental for the Child of the North initiative.

Hospital patients who feel short of breath are six times more likely to die


No increased risk found for patients who are in pain


European Respiratory Society

Stevens & Banzett 

image: 

Authors Jennifer Stevens & Robert Banzett

view more 

Credit: Robert Banzett / ERJ Open Research




The risk of dying is six times higher among patients who become short of breath after being admitted to hospital, according to research published today (Monday) in ERJ Open Research [1]. Patients who were in pain were not more likely to die.

 

The study of nearly 10,000 people suggests that asking patients if they are feeling short of breath could help doctors and nurses to focus care on those who need it most.

 

The study is the first of its kind and was led by Associate Professor Robert Banzett from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. He said: “The sensation of dyspnoea, or breathing discomfort, is a really unpleasant symptom. Some people experience it as feeling starved or air or suffocated. In hospital, nurses routinely ask patients to rate any pain they are experiencing, but this is not the case for dyspnoea. In the past, our research has shown that most people are good at judging and reporting this symptom, yet there is very little evidence on whether it’s linked to how ill hospital patients are.”

 

Working with nurses at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, who documented patient-reported dyspnoea twice per day, the researchers found that it was feasible to ask hospital patients to rate their dyspnoea from 0 to 10, in the same way they are asked to rate their pain. Asking the question and recording the answer only took 45 seconds per patient.

 

Researchers analysed patient-rated shortness of breath and pain for 9,785 adults admitted to the hospital between March 2014 and September 2016. They compared this with data on outcomes, including deaths, in the following two years.

 

This showed that patients who developed shortness of breath in hospital were six times more likely to die in hospital than patients who were not feeling short of breath. The higher patients rated their shortness of breath the higher their risk of dying. Patients with dyspnoea were also more likely to need care from a rapid response team and to be transferred to intensive care.

 

Twenty-five per cent of patients who were feeling short of breath at rest when they were discharged from hospital died within six months, compared to seven per cent mortality among those who felt no dyspnoea during their time in hospital.

 

Conversely, researchers found no clear link between pain and risk of dying.

 

Professor Banzett said: “It is important to note that dyspnoea is not a death sentence – even in the highest risk groups, 94% of patients survive hospitalisation, and 70% survive at least two years following hospitalisation. But knowing which patients are at risk with a simple, fast, and inexpensive assessment should allow better individualised care. We believe that routinely asking patients to rate their shortness of breath will lead to better management of this often-frightening symptom.

“The sensation of dyspnoea is an alert that the body is not getting enough oxygen in and carbon dioxide out. Failure of this system is an existential threat. Sensors throughout the body, in the lungs, heart and other tissues, have evolved to report on the status of the system at all times, and provide early warning of impending failure accompanied by a strong emotional response.

 

“Pain is also a useful warning system, but it does not usually warn of an existential threat. If you hit your thumb with a hammer, you will probably rate your pain 11 on a scale of 0-10, but there is no threat to your life. It is possible that specific kinds of pain, for instance pain in internal organs, may predict mortality, but this distinction is not made in the clinical record of pain ratings.”

 

The researchers say their findings should be confirmed in other types of hospital elsewhere in the world, and that research is needed to show whether asking patients to rate their shortness of breath leads to better treatments and outcomes. “The latter is a difficult study to do because simply knowing about a patient’s dyspnoea status will prompt clinicians to do something, and you can’t tell them not to do it just for the purposes of having a control group for your study. I am retired and my laboratory is closed, but I do hope others will pursue the next steps. I’m confident that some smart young person will figure it out,” Professor Banzett added.

 

Professor Hilary Pinnock is Chair of the European Respiratory Society’s Education Council, based at the University of Edinburgh and was not involved in the research. She said: “Historically, the monitoring of vital signs in hospitalised patients includes respiratory rate along with temperature and pulse rate. In a digital age, some have questioned the value of this workforce-intensive routine, so it is interesting to read about the association of subjective breathlessness with mortality and other adverse outcomes.

 

“Breathlessness was assessed on a 0-10 scale which took less than a minute to administer. These noteworthy findings should trigger more research to understand the mechanisms underpinning this association and how this ‘powerful alarm’ can be harnessed to improve patient care.”

 

Dr Cláudia Almeida Vicente is Chair of the European Respiratory Society’s General practice and primary care group and a GP in Portugal and was not involved in the research. She said: “Feeling short of breath can be a very unpleasant symptom and it can be caused by a variety of problems including asthma, a chest infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and even heart failure.

 

“This study highlights how a simple dyspnoea rating can serve as a strong, early warning sign of clinical decline. New-onset breathlessness during hospitalisation carried especially high risk, far exceeding that associated with pain. For inpatient teams, any rise in dyspnoea should prompt rapid reassessment and closer monitoring.

 

“From a primary care perspective, the elevated two-year mortality in patients discharged with dyspnoea signals the need for tighter post-hospital follow-up. These patients may benefit from early visits, medication review, and proactive management of cardiopulmonary disease. A quick dyspnoea score offers powerful prognostic value and should inform both inpatient decisions and outpatient planning.”

Mysterious ‘holes’ in the Andes may have been an ancient marketplace, study suggests


Evidence supports a new theory for the purpose of Monte Sierpe (aka Band of Holes)



University of Sydney

9-Nov-2025

Mysterious ‘holes’ in the Andes may have been an ancient marketplace, study suggests

University of Sydney

New research from the University of Sydney has uncovered compelling evidence that brings us closer to solving the mystery behind one of the most unique archaeological sites in the Andes. Monte Sierpe (translated as ‘serpent mountain’ and known colloquially as the ‘Band of Holes’) is located in the Pisco Valley of southern Peru and consists of over 5000 precisely aligned holes. This striking, yet puzzling, site has baffled researchers and public audiences for decades.  

To shed new light on this ambiguous feature of Peru’s ancient landscape, an international research team led by Dr Bongers combined microbotanical analysis of sediment samples from the holes with high-resolution aerial imagery, presenting new insights into Monte Sierpe’s organisation and use at both micro and macro scales. Sediment analysis and drone photography of Monte Sierpe supports a new interpretation of this mysterious landscape feature as an Indigenous barter marketplace and accounting system.

Journal

Antiquity

Dr Jacob Bongers 

image: 

Dr Jacob Bongers at the University of Sydney, holding a drone. Credit: Stefanie Zingsheim/University of Sydney. 

view more 

Credit: Stefanie Zingsheim/University of Sydney.