Friday, September 16, 2022

Opponents take to the streets of El Salvador to protest against Bukele on Independence Day

Daniel Stewart - Yesterday 

Several NGOs, unions and opposition groups have marched this Thursday through the streets of the capital of El Salvador, San Salvador, to protest against the president, Nayib Bukele, on the day in which the Central American nation celebrates Independence Day.


Opponents take to the streets of El Salvador to protest against Bukele on Independence Day© Provided by News 360

The demonstration, called 'The great march for freedom', has gathered civil society agents, students, young people and relatives of people detained under the emergency regime.

In fact, the exception regime has been one of the central pillars of the mobilization. The Bukele government approved at the end of March a measure under which authorities have already confirmed the detention of more than 50,000 alleged criminals.

However, Bukele's decision has been criticized both by international human rights organizations and by the Salvadoran population itself, as they consider that arbitrary detentions have been committed under the emergency regime.

Likewise, the mobilization has also served as a protest against the high cost of living, massive layoffs in certain government offices or public indebtedness, according to the local newspaper 'La Prensa Gráfica'.
UK
Reports Kwarteng will lift cap on banker’s bonuses infuriate unions

Peter Walker, Matthew Weaver and Aubrey Allegretti 
The Guardian - Yesterday 

Unions have reacted with fury to the prospect of the government scrapping a cap on bankers’ bonuses, as ministers geared up for a return to near-normal politics next week, topped by an emergency mini-budget on Friday.


Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA© Provided by The Guardian

Kwasi Kwarteng, the chancellor, who will set out plans for tax cuts and give more details about the government’s plans to limit rising energy bills, is also considering whether to shed the legacy of an EU-wide cap on bonuses of twice an employee’s salary, imposed after the 2008 financial crash.

While the cap was intended to curb over-risky practices that helped create the crash, ministers are known to be concerned that the City it at risk of losing out to other financial centres.

According to the Financial Times, Kwarteng wants to abolish the rules as part of what he calls “big bang 2.0”, a post-Brexit deregulation drive to make the City more competitive.

Sources told the paper that Kwarteng wants to boost the City’s competitiveness against New York, Frankfurt, Hong Kong and Paris, with one financier saying an end to the cap was a “clear Brexit dividend. Something you can present as a win.”

It would, however, be a politically perilous move at a time when the bulk of UK households are facing real-terms pay decreases amid 9.9% inflation, as well as notably higher energy bills this winter, despite the government plan to cap increases.

Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the TUC, said people “are being walloped by soaring prices after the longest and harshest wage squeeze in modern history”. She added: “The chancellor’s No 1 priority should be getting wages rising for everyone – not boosting bumper bonuses for those at the top.”

Sharon Graham, general secretary of the Unite union, said workers would be “appalled and angry”. She said: “When millions are struggling to feed their families and keep the lights on, the government’s priority appears to be boosting the telephone number salaries of their friends in the City.”

Andrew Sentance, a member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee during and after the financial crisis, said it was a “very bad” time to consider increasing banker’s bonuses.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Thursday, Sentance said it risked sending “a rather confused signal” amid inflation squeeze: “To appear to allow bankers to have bigger bonuses at the same time, doesn’t look very well timed. There may be some longer-term arguments for pursuing this policy, but I think the timing would be very bad if they did it now.”

The mooted plans come as Kwarteng and Liz Truss prepare to fully set out their economic plan based around lower taxes, reduced regulation and a focus on higher overall economic growth trickling down to all income brackets, as opposed to redistributive policies.

This has been delayed by the mourning period for the Queen, culminating in Monday’s state funeral.

The Commons, which has not sat this week, is scheduled to resume on Wednesday with more MPs swearing allegiance to King Charles, something that is not required but which many wish to do.

Thursday could see details of Truss’s energy price freeze, estimated to cost about £150bn, particularly the still only sketched-out plan to help businesses, as well as news on health. While a draft parliamentary timetable says only that the Commons might sit on Friday, this is expected to be the day for Kwarteng’s “fiscal event”, setting out an initial package of economic policies.

The Commons then goes into recess for the traditional party conference break, and had been due to resume on 17 October. However, MPs will be asked next week to approve an earlier return, on 11 October.

Truss is due to be in New York after the Queen’s funeral for the UN general assembly, returning in time for the mini-budget.

While the new prime minister has seen her political programme sidelined by the death of the Queen, the influx of world leaders before Monday’s funeral will give her the chance to hold talks with some she might not get a chance to see in New York.

Joe Biden, the US president, is among a series of leaders Truss is expected to meet over the weekend in Downing Street and at Chevening, an official country retreat being used while Chequers undergoes maintenance work.

While No 10 insisted such meetings would include talk about the Queen, Truss will also discuss wider issues. A full list of the pre-funeral bilateral chats was due to be released on Friday.

Pressure builds to scrap bankers’ bonus cap as BoE says it never backed policy

Jack Barnett - Yesterday 

Pressure is building on Kwasi Kwarteng tonight to scrap the cap on bankers’ bonuses, as the Bank of England said it never wanted the EU pay restriction.



Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng is drawing up plans to scrap the bankers' bonus cap to try and bank a post-Brexit win for the City.© Provided by City AM

One minister also told City A.M. that scrapping the cap “makes it more attractive to be in London”, with the measure likely to get support among large sections of the Tory party.

Read more
Bankers’ bonus cap could be scrapped by Kwasi Kwarteng

Bank of England says it never wanted bankers’ bonus cap as Kwarteng looks to scrap it© Provided by City AM

The Financial Times reported on Wednesday night that the chancellor was drawing up plans to scrap the measure to try and bank a post-Brexit win for the City.

The cap, which was introduced by Brussels after the 2008 financial crash, sees bankers’ bonuses limited to no more than 100 per cent of their fixed pay or double that with explicit shareholder approval.

Removing the cap, it is argued, could strengthen London’s competitiveness in the global finance industry by allowing City banks to lure the sector’s best talent by offering better remuneration.

It would also cut banks’ fixed costs as they could dish out bonuses instead of increased wages.

A Bank of England spokesperson yesterday said they “did not support the bonus cap when it was introduced”.

“The Senior Managers Regime and remuneration rules requiring deferral of bonus payments are more effective tools for ensuring bankers take proper account of risks,” they said.

Read more
‘Blunt, unsociable and very smart’: Meet new City minister Andrew Griffith


Veteran City commentator David Buik said that removing, or easing, the cap was “logical”.

“This move will stimulate activity in trading markets and in IPO and M&A activity, thus encouraging more banks to focus business on London, thus delivering more taxation to the revenue,” he said.

Pundits have already said that following through with the change would be difficult politically for the government, particularly as the country faces stagflation.

Critics also say it may trigger a return of the high risk behaviour that sparked the global financial crisis.

One Tory MP said it “shouldn’t be a priority”.

“It’s politically odd at this time – it’s only meaningful to a few thousand bankers and risks pissing off the EU when there’s no need to,” they said.

A minister said: “There’s never going to be a good time to do it, but if you can justify it by saying ‘it will increase overall economic growth’ then we should look at it.”

Prime Minister Liz Truss has promised to guide economic policy in a much more free market direction, while also vowing to immediately ditch EU regulation for the City.

She is set to implement radical supply side reforms and embrace a less interventionist style of governing, after Boris Johnson’s big state approach.

A senior London Conservative MP said “it fits entirely with what we expect people to see a lot more of under Liz [Truss] – that we are not here to intervene in the private sector that way”.



Ex-minister says Kwarteng was right to sack Treasury’s top civil servant
© Provided by City AM

“You might say the optics are bad, but if the philosophy is that ‘it’s not up to us to tell banks how to pay their people’, then it makes complete sense,” they said.

The post Pressure builds to scrap bankers’ bonus cap as BoE says it never backed policy appeared first on CityAM.
Russian Supreme Court orders closure of ‘Novaya Gazeta’ newspaper’s website
Daniel Stewart - Yesterday


The Russian Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the closure of the website of the 'Novaya Gazeta' portal, a symbol of critical voices in Russia and whose director, Dimitri Muratov, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2021.


Russian Supreme Court orders closure of ‘Novaya Gazeta’ newspaper’s website© Provided by News 360

The sentence comes to endorse the complaints of the body that controls the media, for not labeling two organizations that operate, in Moscow's eyes, as "foreign agents", according to the newspaper itself, which has already announced that it will file an appeal.

Thursday's hearing was attended by Muratov, who in recent months has already seen the pressure increase on 'Novaya Gazeta' on several fronts. The courts had already ordered the suspension of the newspaper's print edition in a previous ruling.

The Russian edition of 'Novaya Gazeta' had already suspended publication in March following two warnings from media regulator Roskomnadzor, while the European edition, created after the shutdown in Russia, has its access blocked following a request from the Prosecutor's Office.

The newspaper already maintained a limited coverage of the war in Ukraine, after publicly recognizing that it had to avoid certain contents in order not to risk closure following the tightening of censorship promoted by the Kremlin.
U$A
Nearly 90 Percent of the World Isn't Following Us on Ukraine | Opinion

Opinion by Michael Gfoeller and David H. Rundell -

Our familiar system of global political and economic alliances is shifting, and nothing has made this change clearer than the varied reactions to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. While the United States and its closest allies in Europe and Asia have imposed tough economic sanctions on Moscow, 87 percent of the world's population has declined to follow us. Economic sanctions have united our adversaries in shared resistance. Less predictably, the outbreak of Cold War II, has also led countries that were once partners or non-aligned to become increasingly multi-aligned.


An immigration inspection officer checks an oil tanker carrying 
imported crude oil at Qingdao port in China's eastern Shandong province 
on May 9, 2022.
© STR/AFP via Getty Images

Nowhere is the shift more apparent than in energy markets where, unlike with currencies, governments cannot simply print what they need. Here the web of sanctions becomes a sieve.

Saudi Arabia, long a committed American partner, has established a close alliance with Russia in the OPEC Plus cartel. The Saudis have very publicly declined the request of an American president to increase oil production. Instead, they imported Russian oil for domestic use to export more of their own production. Last week they even reduced production and made clear they may do so again.

China is selling Europe liquid natural gas (LNG) that originated in Siberia while importing Russian oil at the same time. It then refines and exports the oil.

Meanwhile, kept solvent by Chinese oil purchases, Iran has become the largest customer for Russian wheat.

India's petroleum minister has stated publicly that his government has no conflict with Moscow and a "moral duty" to keep down energy prices at home by buying Russian oil.

Alliances that were created in part to counter Western economic and political influence are expanding. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey have announced their interest in joining the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). The Shanghai Cooperative Organization currently links China, Russia, India, and Pakistan, among others. Iran plans to join this month while Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar are likely to become "dialogue partners," or candidate members.

Additionally, China's ambitious Belt and Road Initiative is tying many African nations to Beijing with cords of trade and debt. Russia is also reaching out in the form of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who recently addressed his 22 Arab League counterparts in Cairo before touring a number of African countries.

If that's not enough to give the West pause, Moscow is again on the offensive in Latin America, strengthening its military relationships with Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Cuba. The two powerhouses of that region, Brazil and Mexico, have pointedly refused to back Western sanctions against Russia.

The dollar's reserve currency status remains a pillar of the global economic order, but trust in that order has been damaged. Economic sanctions have weaponized parts of the international banking and insurance sectors including the SWIFT fund transfer system. Assets have been seized and commodity contracts canceled. Calls for de-dollarization have become louder. When Russia demanded energy payments in rubles, yuan or UAE Dirhams, China and India complied.

Many Asian economies are now being hit by both rising oil prices and the depreciation of their own currency against the dollar. As a result, they are expanding their use of bilateral currency swaps which allow them to trade among themselves in their own currencies. Eighty years ago the British pound lost its preeminent position among the world's currencies. This is precisely what America's adversaries are trying to do to the dollar and if the Saudis ever stop pricing oil in dollars, they may very well succeed.

Globalization can function only if most participants believe it advances their interests. If the rest believe the West is unfairly using the system for its own benefit, the rules- based international order falls apart and alternatives will emerge.

Today, inflationary pressures and recession fears stalk much of the world. While the wealthy West can afford the cost of sanctions, much of the rest cannot. Europe now competes with the likes of Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Thailand for energy shipments. In North Africa and the Middle East, energy and food shortages have raised the prospect of political unrest similar to the Arab Spring.

These concerns are generating considerable anti-Western sentiment across much of the Global South. While a nuclear-armed Russia shows no willingness to end a war its leaders cannot afford to lose; the West is rapidly losing the rest and thus undermining the very rules-based international order it has sought to create. Our most promising solution to this dilemma is likely to be some sort of diplomatic compromise.

David H. Rundell is the author of Vision or Mirage, Saudi Arabia at the Crossroads and a former Chief of Mission at the American Embassy in Saudi Arabia. Ambassador Michael Gfoeller is a former Political Advisor to the U.S. Central Command.

The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.

Biden Administration, EU Reportedly Pressurize Turkey To Enforce Russia Sanctions
Navdeep Yadav - Yesterday 

The Biden Administration and the European Union are putting pressure on Turkey to enforce Russia sanctions amid concerns that its banking sector is a potential backdoor for illicit finance, the Financial Times reported on Thursday.



What Happened: The U.S. authorities are focusing on Turkish banks that have integrated into Mir, a Russian card payment system for electronic fund transfers, two western officials aware of the discussion told the publication. The EU, too, is preparing a delegation to express its concerns directly to Turkish officials

Why It's Important: The development comes as the Western countries pivot towards tighter implementation of existing sanctions on Russia for its war in Ukraine rather than imposing new measures.

“You’re going to see us kind of focus on financial sector evasion,” the first Western official told the publication. “We’ll send a message very clearly that, for example, third-country financial institutions should not be interconnecting with the Mir payment network because, you know, that carries some sanctions-evasion risks.”

Another source involved in this month’s talks between the E.U. and U.S. on sanctions enforcement said, “We need to close loopholes,” citing Turkey as the major target.

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s country, which is also Vladimir Putin’s ally and a NATO member, has pursued what it calls a “balanced” approach toward the Ukraine war. Erdoğan, who is due to meet Putin on Friday, said last month that there is “serious progress” on expanding Mir in Turkey.
WHITE SUPREMACY
Texas parole board denies posthumous pardon for George Floyd

Theresa Braine - Yesterday 

The Texas parole board has formally denied George Floyd posthumous parole for a 2004 Houston drug conviction whose arresting officer is now under scrutiny.

“The members of the Texas board of pardons and paroles have reconsidered their initial decision concerning your client’s application for a full pardon and/or pardon for innocence,” the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles wrote in a letter Thursday to Floyd’s attorney in the matter, Allison Mathis.

“After a full and careful review of the application and other information filed with the application, a majority of the board decided not to recommend a full pardon and/or pardon for innocence on 9/14/22,” the board’s letter said. “You client is eligible to reapply for a full pardon two years from the above date.”


A person reacts near Cup Foods in Minneapolis after a guilty verdict was announced at the trial of former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin for the 2020 death of George Floyd, Tuesday, April 20, 2021.© Morry Gash

Floyd was killed in May 2020 by former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, with three other officers, all now fired, on hand. Nearly a year after Floyd’s death, Mathis applied for a posthumous pardon over a 2004 drug charge in Houston involving officer Gerald Goines, who today stands accused of fabricating informants, according to The Marshall Project, which was the first to report the board’s move on Thursday.

Goines had been accused of lying to get a warrant for a 2019 drug raid that resulted in the deaths of two innocent people, Dennis Tuttle, 59, and his wife, Rhogena Nicholas, 58. He faces two counts of felony murder, plus a slew of other federal and state charges. Numerous convictions tied to the disgraced former cop have been overturned.

Mathis applied for the pardon in April 2021. The board approved it in October that year, but then withdrew its recommendation in December, saying “procedural errors” had been found in Floyd’s case. In its letter Thursday, the board did not specify its reasons for denying the pardon.

Goines had arrested Floyd in a police sting for allegedly selling $10 worth of crack. He later pleaded guilty to a drug charge and was sentenced to 10 months in a state jail.

“We supported George Floyd’s pardon because we do not have confidence in the integrity of his conviction,” Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg told The Associated Press on Thursday. “We support clemency because it is appropriate.”
BS
Mexican government says train poses no threat to skeleton


MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico’s National Institute of Anthropology and History said Thursday that a prehistoric human skeleton found recently in a flooded cave system along the country’s Caribbean coast was actually registered by the institute in 2019 and would not be threatened by a nearby tourist train project.


In this photo courtesy of Octavio del Rio, shows fragments of a pre-historic human skeleton partly covered by sediment in an underwater cave in Tulum, Mexico, Sept. 10, 2022. The cave system was flooded at the end of the last ice age 8,000 years ago, according to an archaeologist and cave diver Octavio del Rio, and is located near where the government plans to build a high-speed tourist train through the jungle. (Octavio del Rio via AP)© Provided by Associated Press

Earlier this week, archaeologist Octavio del Rio said he and fellow diver Peter Broger saw the shattered skull and skeleton partly covered by sediment in a cave. They reported it to the institute, which had not publicly spoken of the find until its statement Thursday.

“The referenced skeleton corresponds to a 2019 discovery and is fully registered and identified as part of the Holocene Archaeology program,” the institute said. It added that scientific analysis had still not been carried out on the remains, but that it was 400 yards (meters) from the path of the government’s Maya Train project and was not threatened.



In this photo courtesy of Peter Broger, aquatic archaeologist Octavio del Rio films a pre-historic human skeleton partly covered by sediment in an underwater cave in Tulum, Mexico, Sept. 10, 2022. The cave system was flooded at the end of the last ice age 8,000 years ago, according to an archaeologist and cave diver Octavio del Rio, and is located near where the government plans to build a high-speed tourist train through the jungle. (Peter Broger via AP)© Provided by Associated Press

Del Rio, who has worked with the institute in the past but who is not currently affiliated, said Thursday the fact that the discovery was made in 2019, but still had not been analyzed, illustrated how long it takes to explore and investigate the extensive cave systems in the train’s path.

“This proves the area’s archaeological potential for investigation of the first settlers of America, and what there still is to discover,” Del Rio said.

He had said the skeleton was about 8 meters (26 feet) underwater, about a half-kilometer (a third of a mile) into the cave system.

Given the distance from the cave entrance, the skeleton couldn’t have gotten there without modern diving equipment, so it must be over 8,000 years old, Del Rio had earlier said, referring to the era when rising sea levels flooded the caves.

Some of the oldest human remains in North America have been discovered in the sinkhole caves known as “cenotes” on Mexico’s Caribbean coast, and experts say some of those caves are threatened by the Mexican government’s Maya Train tourism project.

Del Rio feared that even if the train did not pass directly over the site, its construction could damage or contaminate the cave system.

President Andrés Manuel López Obrador is racing to finish his Maya Train project in the remaining two years of his term over the objections of environmentalists, cave divers and archaeologists. They say his haste will allow little time to study the ancient remains.

Activists say the heavy, high-speed rail project will fragment the coastal jungle and will run often above the fragile limestone caves, which — because they are flooded, twisty and often incredibly narrow — can take decades to explore.

Caves along part of the coast already have been damaged by construction above them, with cement pilings used to support the weight above.

The 950-mile (1,500-kilometer) Maya Train line is meant to run in a rough loop around the Yucatan Peninsula, connecting beach resorts and archaeological sites.
Hungary – EU Parliament denounces Hungary as a «hybrid autocratic regime» and criticizes EU-27 inaction

Daniel Stewart - Yesterday


The plenary of the European Parliament has denounced Thursday that Hungary has become a "hybrid regime of electoral autocracy", in which elections are held but democratic standards are not respected, while accusing Member States of inaction for not moving forward in the Council with the procedure to sanction partners who put the rule of law at serious risk.

The report adopted with 433 votes in favor, 123 against and 28 abstentions recalls that four years ago the European Parliament itself initiated the procedure that activates Article 7 of the EU Treaty and warns that during this period the situation of fundamental rights in Hungary has deteriorated by the "deliberate and systemic efforts of the government" of Viktor Orbán.

Among the main areas of concern to MEPs are the functioning of the constitutional and electoral systems, the independence of the judiciary, corruption and conflicts of interest, and freedom of expression, including media pluralism.

They also warn of threats to academic freedom, freedom of religion and association, the right to equal treatment, including the rights of LGBTIQ people, minority rights and the situation of migrants, asylum seekers and refugees.

Thus, the plenary meeting in Strasbourg (France) regretted the lack of action on the part of the Twenty-seven to which it stressed that they can move forward in the Article 7 procedure without the need for unanimity, since this level of consensus is only necessary to decide on possible sanctions at the end of the analysis of the rule of law by this mechanism.

They also demand that Budapest's anti-democratic drift should have consequences on its access to European funds, for example by excluding from financing cohesion programs that contribute to the misuse of EU funds or to violations of the rule of law.

In the view of MEPs, Hungary's recovery plan should also not be approved until the country fully complies with all the recommendations of the European Semester and implements all relevant rulings of the EU Court of Justice and the Court of Human Rights.

Hungary's response came from the Government spokesman, Zoltan Kovacs, who urged the European Parliament to "focus" on the rising energy prices resulting from the "failed sanctions" against Russia.

"Because of sanctions, Europeans are poorer and Russia is making huge profits," Kovacs said on Twitter. "When Brussels passed the sanctions, this was not what it promised the European population," he has apostrophized.

FREEZING COHESION FUNDS Precisely this Sunday, the European Commission plans to adopt a proposal to freeze "billions of euros" in cohesion funds to Hungary because of the risk that the Orbán government will use them in programs that jeopardize the rule of law in the country, EU sources have indicated.

The draft proposal to which Europa Press had access and which was drafted last July by the Commissioner for Budgets, Johannes Hahn, estimated that given the seriousness of the threat should be blocked around 70% of three EU programs, including one energy.

Although the document of the Community Executive did not put a figure on the value of the funds that could be suspended, the Hungarian press has estimated their value at around 8.8 billion euros.

However, the Community sources warn that the percentage that Brussels finally proposes to freeze will be lower than the one included in the draft in view of the reforms that Budapest has promised in the last contacts with the Community services, including measures to reinforce the fight against corruption.

In any case, the last word will be of the Twenty-seven that once received the proposal that the College of Commissioners will have one month to take a decision, although it can extend the term up to three months, so the measure will not be immediate.
For Indigenous Australians, painful colonial past mars queen’s legacy

Rachel Pannett, Michael E. Miller - Yesterday 
WASHINGTON POST

SYDNEY — When a young Queen Elizabeth II visited Australia on her first royal tour Down Under in 1954, one local authority erected hessian screens to shield the monarch’s motorcade from viewing Aboriginal camps along the route, according to several Indigenous elders.

Starting in the mid-1800s until 1970, about two decades into Elizabeth’s reign, government officials rounded up children — especially those of mixed White and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethnicity. In many cases, the children were forcibly sent to boarding schools and church-run missions. For decades, as many as 1 in 3 Indigenous children were forcibly removed from their families nationwide, according to a later report commissioned by the Australian government. The children became known as the “stolen generations.”

The queen’s death last week brought the spotlight back to the complicated relationship between the monarchy and First Nations people here and around the world. Indigenous Australians have suffered greatly since the explorer James Cook first claimed part of the continent for the British crown — then held by the queen’s ancestor, King George III — and debate continues on whether she was responsible for past wrongs and the inequities many still face.

For some, the monarchy lies at the center of a vexed, often traumatic reckoning with their colonial past.

“The queen and her family represent the colonial system, which has created havoc in this country against First Nations people,” Lidia Thorpe, an Aboriginal senator with the left-of-center Greens, said in an interview with The Washington Post. “In all the time that this queen was reigning over our country — or so-called reigning over this country — not once did that queen try to stop any injustice against First Nations people.”



Australian Sen. Lidia Thorpe raises her fist during her swearing-in ceremony last month. Sh
e also referred to the "colonizing Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II” while taking the oath of office.
© Reuters


Australia is one of the few settler-colonized Commonwealth nations that doesn’t have a treaty with its First Nations people. In neighboring New Zealand, Indigenous Maori chiefs signed one with the British crown in 1840, and Elizabeth was involved in at least one major treaty settlement, the country’s foreign minister, Nanaia Mahuta, recalled in Parliament on Tuesday.

The treaty, though acknowledged as imperfect by the queen, formed a binding connection between the Maori people and the crown. Later, it helped pave the way for settlements for the wrongful confiscation of land.

In Australia, the dark legacy of British imperialism has contributed to racial disparities in education, housing and incarceration rates, experts say. More than 400 Aboriginal people have died in custody since 1991, and the life expectancy of its 800,000 Indigenous people lags behind the wider population by years, government data shows.

Although some Indigenous elders recall the queen fondly — she visited the nation 16 times, venturing deep into the Outback — others have refused to mourn.

An Indigenous rugby league player received a one-game ban and a suspended fine this week from the sport’s administrators over a tweet — which was later deleted — that appeared to celebrate Elizabeth’s death. The Australian rules football league, meanwhile, decided not to mandate a minute’s silence for the queen during a round of competition celebrating Indigenous players and culture because it stirred up mixed emotions, the Age newspaper reported.



An Indigenous dancer performs as Governor-General David Hurley, second left, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese watch at the Proclamation of King Charles III in Canberra, Australia, last week.
© Mick Tsikas/AP

The Indigenous population is generally younger than the wider Australian population — some 31 percent were under 15 in 2021, according to official estimates — meaning many were probably too young to recall the queen’s last visit, in 2011. Only around 5 percent were 65 or older, compared with about 17 percent of non-Indigenous Australians


Thorpe — who made international headlines last month when she improvised at her swearing-in ceremony, adding the word “colonizing” as she pledged allegiance to Elizabeth — quipped that she was “probably busy doing something a lot better” during the last royal visit.

She is among a group of Australian lawmakers calling for a treaty with First Nations people, followed by a republic that would replace King Charles III with an Australian as head of state. “That is how we will unify this nation,” Thorpe said.

Elizabeth’s death has sparked fresh debate in a number of Commonwealth realms about severing ties to the monarchy, although Australia’s leader has said he’s in no rush to address the divisive issue in his term.


In New Zealand, where Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has said a republic is probable in her lifetime — she’s 42 — Maori politicians also reflected on the monarchy’s mixed legacy.

During condolences in Parliament on Tuesday, Maori party co-leader Rawiri Waititi said the British Empire was built on stolen “whenua” and stolen “taonga,” using the Maori words for land and treasure.

Mahuta, the foreign minister, who joined Charles at a Commonwealth leaders meeting in Rwanda a few months ago, said he made a commitment then to modernize the Commonwealth.

“He noted that to unlock the power of our common future, we must also acknowledge the wrongs which have shaped our past,” she told Parliament. “He spoke of colonialism, he spoke of slavery, and he understood the challenge in front of him.”
US hid fears of radiation directed at Moscow embassy in 70s, documents reveal

Julian Borger in New York - THE GUARDIAN - Yesterday 

The US complained to the Soviet Union for more than a decade about microwave radiation directed at its embassy in Moscow, but kept concerns secret from embassy staff for nine years, according to newly declassified documents.


Photograph: AP© Provided by The Guardian

The reported microwave radiation came to be known as the “Moscow signal” and was the source of frequent complaints from Washington. US officials were unsure of either the purpose of the signal or the potential health effects of long-term exposure to low-level microwave radiation.

The declassified documents, obtained by the National Security Archive at George Washington University, provide a historical perspective on current anxiety about “Havana syndrome”, a cluster of mysterious neurological symptoms afflicting scores of US diplomats and spies, which the US believes may have been caused deliberately by some form of directed energy weapon.

The first reference to the Moscow signal was in a June 1967 state department memo recording a conversation between the then US secretary of state, Dean Rusk, and the Soviet foreign minister, Andrei Gromyko, in which Rusk raised the matter of the “electro-magnetic signal” aimed at the embassy in Moscow. Gromyko expressed scepticism about the claim, but Rusk insisted there was “no doubt whatever about it” and sketched a rough diagram to illustrate his point. Gromyko said he would “look into the matter” but no change in the level of radiation was detected.

Over the years that followed, the microwave signals multiplied and intensified.

President Gerald Ford wrote to the Soviet leader, Leonid Brezhnev, in December 1975: “These transmissions have created levels of radiation within the embassy which may, in the opinion of our medical authorities, represent a hazard to the health of the American families living and working in that building. Indeed, in one particular case, they may already have caused a serious health problem for one member of our embassy staff.”

Ford was almost certainly referring to the ambassador Walter Stoessel, who became ill with leukaemia at that time, and died of the disease a decade later.

In his reply to the president, Brezhnev insisted the electromagnetic field around the US embassy was “of industrial origin”.

Despite US fears about the health effects, embassy staff were not informed, apparently because of concerns the story would leak to the media and upset arms control negotiations with Moscow. Stoessel’s illness was kept secret.

In a 1975 conversation with the then Soviet ambassador in Washington, Anatoly Dobrynin, the US secretary of state, Henry Kissinger, asked for the signal to be turned off before he made a planned visit to Moscow or, he joked, “You could give me a radiation treatment”.

“We really are sitting on it here, but too many people know about it,” Kissinger told the ambassador. If it was discovered that the Nixon and Ford administrations had known about the problem and done nothing to stop it, he said, “we will catch hell”.

The embassy staff were finally informed in 1976. A state department telegram from February of that year said employees should be briefed in small groups but they should not pass on the details to their dependants. However, the telegram recommended that pregnant staff or family members be medically evacuated immediately for tests.

The Soviet leadership took no heed of the US complaints and it is unclear when the Moscow signal was turned off, if it ever existed. US experts were mystified over the purpose of the microwave radiation, with the two leading theories being that it was intended to neutralise electronic intelligence gathering by the embassy, or to activate listening devices built into the structure of the embassy.

When the previous embassy building was demolished in 1964, dozens of microphones had been found embedded in its walls.
Chernobyl or Fukushima? Understanding the Dangers of Zaporizhzhia | Opinion

Cheryl Rofer - Yesterday 

Europe's largest nuclear power plant, which has been under attack since February, has now shut down all six of its reactors. The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), located in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, is now safer, even if it deprives the people the plant served of electricity.


A Ukrainian Emergency Ministry rescuer assists a woman to put on protective clothing during a nuclear emergency training session for civilians in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv on Sept. 8, 2022.
© YURIY DYACHYSHYN/AFP via Getty Images

Every day the reactors are shut down the heat and radioactivity decrease making a meltdown less likely. As of this writing, two power lines coming into the plant have been reconnected; two representatives of the International Atomic Energy Agency are now at the plant; and talks are underway to end the shelling of the plant. All this lessens the danger of a radioactive leak but doesn't eliminate it.

There is no danger of an accident like that at Chernobyl in 1986, but a meltdown like that at Fukushima, in Japan, remains possible. The heat from decaying fission products must be removed from the reactor cores by circulating water. The power for the circulation pumps comes from outside the plant, and the power from the grid has been interrupted many times. A nearby coal plant or on-site diesel-powered generators have supplied power during those interruptions. Now that the reactors are shut down, no more fission products are produced, and heat, radioactivity, and danger of a meltdown decrease.

If a meltdown did occur, the large reinforced-concrete reactor buildings are designed to contain it. Shelling could break that containment, although it is rated to survive an airplane crash.

Another danger at the plant is stored fuel that has been used in the reactors. Initially, it is placed in pools with circulating water—power again needed—to keep it cool. As it cools over months, it is loaded into concrete containers. Both pools and concrete containers are present at the site. Bombing of the pools could disperse radioactivity. If releasing radioactive material were Russia's objective, the pools would be the likeliest target.

Russia's occupation of the Ukrainian plant appears to have been part of the initial attempt to gain control of the country. Russian troops occupied the plant in March. Other power plants were also targeted because of their strategic importance. When the plan failed, Russia remained in control of ZNPP. A major objective now seems to be linking it to the Russian electrical grid.

Early in the war, Russian President Vladimir Putin was not shy about reminding the world of his country's nuclear weapons arsenal. His rhetoric did nothing to convince Ukraine or its supporters to throw in the towel, so ZNPP was slotted into the fear rhetoric in place of nuclear weapons. This provided some of the reaction the Kremlin was looking for, although there was no accession to Russia's demands.

Russia has used the plant as a military base, assuming that Ukraine will not take the risks inherent in shelling it. The occupying soldiers brutalized the operators, though they continue to run the plant. Russia has also sent in representatives from Rosatom, their state nuclear agency, who seem to have some understanding of what is required at a nuclear plant. The Rosatom presence confuses the Ukrainian operators' chain of command.

Russia should be motivated to keep the plant secure and whole if they want to connect it to their electrical grid. Using it as a nuclear threat conflicts with stealing the electricity. Still, the Russians have made the plant even more of a target by storing military vehicles near the reactors and in the turbine rooms.

It's not clear who is shelling the plant, but it seems aimed at disconnecting the plant from external power rather than directly to creating a radiological disaster. But the off and on operation experienced in recent weeks can damage the electrical equipment, if not the reactors themselves.

After his visit to the plant, the director-general of the IAEA, Rafael Mariano Grossi, has proposed a demilitarized zone around the plant, and in current talks, Russia and Ukraine seem willing to at least stop shelling.

Of course, full withdrawal of Russian troops and a demilitarized zone around the reactor and the city of Enerhodar—where the workers live—would be the best solution. It's hard to think of anything more obvious than the fact nuclear reactors don't belong in the middle of a war.

Cheryl Rofer is an independent scholar. She worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory from 1965 to 2001, developed an essential spectrum for laser isotope separation, managed environmental cleanups at the Laboratory and a program to develop a disposal method for hazardous waste, and worked with Estonia and Kazakhstan to clean up environmental problems left by the Soviet Union.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.