Wednesday, November 23, 2022

Police to text 70,000 victims in UK's biggest anti-fraud operation

  • PublishedShare
IMAGE SOURCE,METROPOLITAN POLICE
Image caption,
Police raid alleged fraudster

Police will text 70,000 people to warn them they have been victims of a banking scam in the UK's biggest anti-fraud operation.

The Metropolitan Police have arrested an east London man accused of running an international service enabling fake phone calls to victims.

Victims lost thousands of pounds, and in one case £3m.

Detectives only have their phone numbers and are asking people to act if they receive the message.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley described the investigation as the biggest proactive counter-fraud investigation ever in the UK.

He said the criminals involved were responsible for the "industrialisation of fraud".

Detectives revealed that there could be 200,000 UK victims of the scams, which usually involved fraudsters calling, pretending to be a bank, warning a customer of alleged suspicious activity on their account.

An address in east London is alleged to have been at the centre of the service which police believe enabled fraud on a global scale.

How will people know the text is genuine?

During the investigation, police obtained the numbers of victims but not their names and addresses.

They will send a mass text message to 70,000 numbers asking people to go to the Action Fraud website to register their details.

Detectives are aware of the risks of using a text message to contact victims of fraud who may have been targeted through their mobile phones.

They said the message from the police would only have links to the Action Fraud site, and would only be sent on 24 and 25 November. Any other texts should be regarded as fraudulent themselves.

IMAGE SOURCE,METROPOLITAN POLICE
Image caption,
The iSpoof website was taken down by the FBI following the Met investigation

The iSpoof website, involved in the scam, was advertised openly on the internet. It allegedly provided access to a server, initially based in Holland and then Ukraine, which criminals could use to make anonymous calls to victims from a spoof phone number.

This allowed them to pose as employees of banks including Barclays, Santander, HSBC, Lloyds, Halifax, First Direct, NatWest, Nationwide and TSB.

Victims were asked to enter a "one-time code" or password for their account into their phone, which was intercepted by the iSpoof server and made available to the fraudsters.

Criminals could then use these details to "clear out the accounts" of their victims, detectives said.

"Devastating crime"

Det Supt Helen Rance, from the Met's Cyber Crime unit, said victims would not have known the phone call was coming from iSpoof.

"The person on the other end of the line can be very convincing," she said.

"This is an absolutely devastating crime for so many people. They must be worried, I really feel for them," she said.

Fraudsters paid between £150 and £5,000 a month in bitcoin to use the iSpoof service, contacting, at times, 20 people a minute, primarily in the USA, UK, Netherlands, Australia, France and Ireland.

So far, police believe £48m may have been stolen by criminals using iSpoof, with those behind the service allegedly earning £3.2m and living "lavish" lifestyles. This figure is likely to rise.

A notice on the website says that it has been taken down by the FBI.

Det Supt Rance said the investigation remained live.

IMAGE SOURCE,METROPOLITAN POLICE

"We are still making arrests today and tomorrow," she said. "This work will have prevented hundreds and thousands of online fraud crimes.

"Our message to criminals who have used this website is we have your details and are working hard to locate you, regardless of where you are."

Operation Elaborate

Metropolitan Police fraud and cyber-crime detectives launched Operation Elaborate in June 2021 after asking experts which websites posed the greatest risk in the UK.

The Met said investigators infiltrated iSpoof and began gathering information, including 70 million data records.

A breakthrough came when they discovered that police in the Netherlands had placed a "bug"' on the server, allowing them to record calls being made through it.

This evidence was shared with police in the UK, and the European law enforcement bodies Europol and Eurojust.

IMAGE SOURCE,METROPOLITAN POLICE
Image caption,
In raids around the UK, 120 people have been arrested and potential evidence seized

Police believe 59,000 potential suspects may have used the iSpoof service, but are prioritising those in the UK who have spent at least 100 bitcoin to get access, believing they were anonymous.

Early in November 2022 they raided an address in east London and arrested a man alleged to be behind iSpoof.

In other raids, 120 people thought to have used the service for fraud have been taken into custody.

Det Supt Rance warned other criminal "enablers" will have taken over to provide services to fraudsters.

"Undoubtedly they will go to another website," she said. "They have created back-ups. We have not solved this problem."

But she said one major outcome of the investigation was to have "discredited" the iSpoof name.

A 34-year-old man, Teejai Fletcher, has been charged with making or supplying articles for use in fraud and participating in the activities of an organised crime group.

He will appear at Southwark Crown Court on 6 December.

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Credit Suisse to layoff 9,000 people, projects $1.6bn Q4 loss
Credit Suisse to layoff 9,000 people, projects $1.6bn Q4 loss
Written byAthik Saleh
Nov 24, 2022, 11:33 am2 min read
Credit Suisse was convicted for failing to prevent money laundering by a Bulgarian cocaine trafficking gang

A string of scandals this year has dogged Swiss bank Credit Suisse. Add to that the challenging economic environment, and we have a recipe for disaster.The bank has now said that it projects a CHF 1.5 billion ($1.6 billion) loss in the fourth quarter due to declining client activity.It also plans to ax 9,000 employees by 2025 to cut costs.

Why does this story matter?

  • Credit Suisse, the second-largest Swiss bank, hasn't had the best of 2022 so far. Constantly declining share prices, a money laundering-related conviction, failed bets on Archegos Capital Management and Greensill Capital...the list goes on.
  • Last month, the bank's credit default swap reached its highest in the last two decades. Considering all that, restructuring has been in the cards for a while for the bank.

Bank expects losses in wealth management and investment banking

In its Q4 projection, Credit Suisse said that it expects losses in wealth management sections and investment banking. It attributed this to the market conditions, continuous credit outflows, and the sale of non-core businesses.The bank projects a total pre-tax loss of around CHF $1.5 billion. It expects to lose CHF 75 million due to the sale of the shareholding in the Allfunds group.

Number of deposits and assets under management will decrease

The number of deposits in the bank and the assets under its management are set to decrease in Q4. This will result in a decline in net interest income, recurring commissions, and fees, which will lead to a loss for the wealth management division.

Bank plans to undergo a complete overhaul

Credit Suisse is set to undergo a sweeping overhaul. A number of scandals have the market questioning the bank's financial health. The Zurich-based bank plans to restructure its business to address that.The bank held an extraordinary general meeting to seek shareholders' approval for the bank's restructuring plans and its proposal to raise CHF 4 billion .

It aims to cut 2,700 jobs in Q4

As part of the restructuring, the bank plans to cut jobs. It aims to slash 2,700 jobs in the fourth quarter and around 9,000 by 2025.The bank said that layoffs will depend on several factors, including the performance for the rest of the year, the continued exit of non-core positions, goodwill impairments, and the outcome of other asset sales.



Credit Suisse to axe jobs in Chinese investment banking and research units


By NS Banking Staff Writer 
 23 Nov 2022

More than 20 investment bankers at Credit Suisse’s 51% owned Chinese venture, Credit Suisse Securities, which had a total of 68 employees by the end of last year, have been notified about the job cuts


Credit Suisse, Paradeplatz in Zürich, Switzerland.
 (Credit: Roland zh/Wikipedia)

Credit Suisse is reportedly laying off around one-third of its employees in the investment banking division, and nearly half of its workforce in the research department, in China.

More than 20 investment bankers at Credit Suisse Securities, the bank’s 51% owned jointure venture in China, have been notified about the job cuts, reported Reuters.

Credit Suisse Securities had 68 employees working in its investment banking department by the end of last year.

The bank is also reducing the headcount in its research department by laying off nearly 10 people, which initially had 24 employees.

The announcement follows less than one month after the Swiss investment bank announced the strategic restructuring of its global business.

As part of the strategic restructuring, the bank announced its plans to raise $4.18bn in the capital, along with 9,000 job cuts in the next three years.

The restructuring plan also included the spinning-off of the investment banking business and focusing on institutional and wealth management clients.

The announcement follows two months after the bank agreed to invest $160m to fully control its securities business in China, reported Bloomberg.

Reuters said that Wall Street banks are preparing to cut jobs in China, due to the impact of Covid-19 restrictions and weak growth of business in the country.

Goldman Sachs has announced the axing of 25 jobs in China, and Morgan Stanley plans to eliminate around 50 investment-banking jobs in the Asia-Pacific region, said the publication.

Earlier this month, Credit Suisse signed definitive agreements to sell a significant part of its Securitized Products Group (SPG) and other related financing businesses to Apollo Global Management (Apollo).

The agreement is said to support the company’s strategic plan to exit from the SPG business, de-risk its Investment Bank, and release capital to invest in its core businesses.

The transaction is expected to be completed in the first half of 2023, subject to regulatory approvals, customer approvals and other customary closing conditions.

Credit Suisse credit traders still waiting for retention payments

bySarah Butcher
21 November 2022



He came and he went and people still don't seem any happier.

Sources at Credit Suisse say Joel Kent's visit to London last week didn't result in any new retention bonuses, but it did seemingly coincide with more job cuts.

Kent's visit from New York last week was meant to stabilize the Credit Suisse credit sales and trading business ('global credit products) following the removal of various team members and ahead of its transplantation into CS First Boston.

Credit Suisse isn't commenting, but sources say Kent's message to CS credit professionals in both London and New York has effectively been, "I have no information and if you don't like it, you can leave."

Kent was promoted to global head of credit product at Credit Suisse in September, but insiders suggest he's comparatively powerless when it comes to keeping his team happy. Instead, the real power to determine the future of the credit team lies with Michael Klein, who will be the chief executive of CS First Boston, and David Miller, who will be Klein's second in command.

As members of the credit team jostle for position and seek to avoid the purge, it's proximity to Miller in particular that's seen as the new way of getting ahead. Miller's people are said to include the likes of Jason Safriet, who runs credit sales for Credit Suisse out of New York.

As the credit business cuts costs, some unlikely people are being ejected. As we reported last week, they include high performing female managing directors in sales like Amy Emmanuel, who'd been at Credit Suisse for two decades, or Adrienne Lucier, who'd worked there since 2010. Sources say that Patrick White, a director in high yield Credit Sales who'd been at the bank since 2008 also left in recent weeks, and that various other people were let go in London last week.

As Credit Suisse salespeople and traders wonder if they're going to get pushed, headhunters say the best people are in danger of being picked off. Deutsche Bank already recruited Diego Discepoli, the head of the EMEA business, and other banks are sniffing around too. "Most people there are willing to discuss opportunities," says one London headhunter.

In theory, Credit Suisse traders should at least be locked in by last year's bonuses, which included a cash component that can be clawed back if they leave. In reality, headhunters say most hiring banks are willing to buy any previous bonuses that are left in the table.

Click here to create a profile on eFinancialCareers. Comment ANONYMOUSLY on articles and make yourself visible to recruiters hiring for top jobs in technology and finance.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com in the first instance. Whatsapp/Signal/Telegram also available (Telegram: @SarahButcher)

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

AUTHOR
Sarah Butcher
Global Editor
Posthaste: Now it's the wealthy's turn to worry about the economy squeezing their finances

Story by Victoria Wells • 




After months of belt tightening by low- and middle-income families, it’s wealthy Canadians’ turn to worry about the economy’s impact on their pocketbooks.


People who have assets of $1 million or more say they’re more stressed out about their finances than they were this time last year, according to a new study out this morning from IG Wealth Management. More than three-quarters, or 82 per cent, say they’re worried about the economy, while 72 per cent are fretting about the cost of energy. Close to half, or 49 per cent, are concerned about rising interest rates.

“Much like other groups, high-net-worth Canadians are concerned about where the economy is going and its impact on their personal situation,” Damon Murchison, chief executive of IG Wealth Management, said in a news release.

Economic worries have become universal as inflation and climbing interest rates take a toll on most people’s budgets. Every day expenses such as grocery bills have been especially squeezed. Prices for food bought in stores rose 11 per cent in October from the same time last year, Statistics Canada data show. But the costs of some dinner staples have surged even more, with pasta prices up 44.8 per cent, lettuce up 30.2 per cent and rice up 14.7 per cent on a year-over-year basis. Meanwhile, gas prices rose 17.8 per cent in October from the same month last year. Combine that with higher debt costs from rising interest rates, and many have been forced to take an axe to their spending by cutting back on streaming services , or other discretionary purchases, to pay the bills.



Making ends meet is less of a worry for high-income Canadians. Instead, they’re more concerned with protecting and growing the wealth they already have amid volatile stock markets and a slowing economy. That’s also leading some to think again about what their retirement will look like. Though they’re not worried about having enough money to retire — 85 per cent say that’s not a concern — half say they will likely need to stash away more than they originally thought to maintain a certain lifestyle. Almost half say they’re rethinking their investment strategies as a result.

And not unlike Canadians’ with lower incomes, the wealthy are also making moves to delay their retirement start dates as life grows more expensive. Close to half, or 46 per cent, say they’re changing when they’ll make the leap to full retirement. More than 50 per cent say they’ll need to keep working longer to reach their savings goals because their investments aren’t performing the way they expected.

Still, most wealthy persons have access to professional advice to help them weather a stormy economy, with three-quarters saying they already work with a financial adviser. However, there could be room for improvement. Only 45 per cent have a plan that covers all aspects of their personal finances, such as lifestyle considerations, income and tax and estate planning. And just over half say their adviser gives them the support they need to overcome any negative impacts the economy might have on their investments.

But for high-net-worth individuals, the solution to getting through these “complicated times” financially intact is simple: get a comprehensive plan in place. That’s where a professional can step in and help, IG Wealth Management said.

“With wealth comes increased complexity,” Murchison said. “It’s especially important during these times to not only seek out the help of a qualified financial adviser who can put things in perspective, but also to select one that will work with you to develop a holistic financial plan that’s stress-tested and keeps pace with your evolving situation.”


SIEG HEIL; IKEA

KINSELLA: We increasingly have a problem with extremism
Opinion by Warren Kinsella • Yesterday - TORONTO SUN

- Picture taken on December 3, 2012 shows Ikea founder Ingvar Kamprad gesturing prior the inauguration of the Margaretha Kamprad Chair of Environmental Science and Limnology at the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology of Lausanne (EPFL) in Lausanne, Switzerland, on Dec. 3, 2012

STOCKHOLM — Extremism comes on tiny feet. You almost don’t see it until it’s too late.

Take this IKEA, for example, on Regeringsgatan, near the old city of Stockholm. Here, tucked between grandiose 16th-century buildings and charming cobblestone streets, is another IKEA.

It’s just like the ones in Canada, found from Vancouver to Halifax. Everything’s the same. Same corporate colours, same stuff for sale, even the same meatballs and lingonberries. (Which are as ubiquitous as they are delicious, by the way.)

IKEA advertises everything from candles to pillows, but it doesn’t advertise one important fact: It was founded by a fellow who was an extremist. A neo-Nazi, in fact.

Oh, sure, IKEA doesn’t completely hide who their founder was. He was a genial-looking fellow named Ingvar Kamprad, who — says IKEA’s website — was “rebel-hearted.” Uh-huh. Ingvar had “a dream to create a better life for as many people as possible — whatever the size of their wallet — (which) is and will always be our driving force.”

Well, not exactly everyone.

Ingvar, who died in 2018 at the age of 91, wasn’t too fussy about foreigners, Jews and other minorities. He wasn’t so enthusiastic about “creating a better life” for them, actually. Ingvar was a member of the fascist New Swedish Movement. The IKEA website doesn’t have a whole lot of information about that.

Ingvar joined the New Swedish Movement when he was a teenager, even before he founded IKEA as a mail order company in his family’s backyard. The leader of the far-right group was rabid anti-Semite and Adolf Hitler fan Per Engdahl, who said Hitler was “God’s saviour of Europe.”

Historians record that Ingvar recruited members and raised funds for Engdahl’s pro-Nazi group, even while the Second World War was still raging. And he remained a confidante of Engdahl for many years after that.

When caught, Ingvar insisted his involvement with fascism was “a mistake.” But, in her wonderfully-titled book “Made in Sweden: How the Swedes Are Not Nearly So Egalitarian, Tolerant, Hospitable or Cozy As They Would Like to Have You Think,” author Elisabeth Asbrink wrote the Swedish security service had a bulging file on Ingvar titled “Nazi.”

And, as recently as 2010, when Canadians were still gleefully assembling IKEA bookcases with Allen keys, Ingvar told Asbrink that “Per Engdahl is a great man, and I will maintain that as long as I live.”

So, there you go. We are all sitting on couches that, at one point, funded Nazism. Extremism, in other words.

That’s relevant, these days, because there’s quite a bit of it to be seen just about everywhere you look. Not just Sweden.

Here in Sweden in September, the extremist Sweden Democrats took more than 20% of the vote in the national election, making them the second-largest party in the Riksdag legislature.

The Sweden Democrats trace their beginnings to this country’s neo-Nazi movement. They don’t particularly like Muslims or immigrants, and said during the election they favour giving foreigners “one-way tickets” back to Kabul.

To the extent that the world pays any attention whatsoever to Swedes who don’t play hockey, the huge success of a political party with actual pro-Nazi roots went more or less unnoticed. How come?

Well, because the beast is awake everywhere, pretty much. Extremism is to be seen in a lot of surprising places, these days.

Not, we hasten to say, in the policies of the parties led by Justin Trudeau or Pierre Poilievre or Jagmeet Singh. Not even in Poilievre’s Conservative Party, which may be conservative, but is on record as favouring the admission of more immigrants — and at a faster pace, too.

No, extremism is seen in less-visible ways.

When some people wave around a swastika flag during the Ottawa occupation, for example, and nobody does a damn thing to take it away from them. Or when white supremacist members of Diagolon are caught heading to the Coutts, Alta., border crossing with a cache of weapons, allegedly to murder police, and people shrug.

Or even when the richest man in the world gives a rabid anti-Semite like Kanye West back his Twitter account. After he said he was going to go “Def Con” on Jews. Or how Twitter blithely allows extremist threats against my Postmedia colleagues, and other journalists, all the time. All that.

So, we should probably give the Swedes a break, the fascist leanings of IKEA’s founder notwithstanding. They’ve got a problem with extremism, yes.

And, if we’re honest with ourselves, we increasingly do, too.
POSTMODERN ROBBER BARON

Twitter Reportedly Stiffs Vendors, Cuts Employee Benefits As Musk Tries To Cut Costs

Story by Matt Salter • Yesterday 

In the ongoing saga of Elon Musk's adventures on Twitter, we've seen a variety of business strategies. He's issued ultimatums. He's made commitments to bold new moderation strategies that never materialized. He's even staged open polls on the future of the platform. At the risk of stepping on the man's own joke, he's throwing the kitchen sink at his problems.


twitter hq building dublin seagull© Charles Mcquillan/Getty Images


As of November 22, Musk is trying a truly remarkable new strategy: he's just not going to pay what he owes.

As the New York Times reports, Musk has been desperate to cut costs as his employees have bailed en masse and he struggles to keep the lights on. Sources inside Twitter have reported that Musk is now flat-out refusing to pay vendors for outstanding debts, to the point of instructing them to duck calls from collectors. Those sources also indicate that a major target of Musk's fixation on cutting costs may be the benefits of Twitter employees.

We and the Times agree that Musk will probably pay what he owes. He's likely just playing negotiation hardball, seeking a favorable settlement by dangling the possibility of nonpayment. Twitter is under massive debt pressure: the Times reports $13 billion in debt from the acquisition alone. Musk is likely, and understandably, frustrated over having to service debts from before his tenure, many of them incurred by people who no longer work for him.

A bigger problem might be Musk's desire to cut employee benefits. Per multiple sources, Musk brought in long-term allies Steve Davis, Jared Birchell, who heads Musk's family office, and Antonio Gracias, a friend, and former director of Tesla tasking them to slash expenses and target benefits. Everything from expense accounts and corporate credit cards to food quality in the cafeterias has suffered since.

Musk is playing with fire. Twitter has already shown serious problems with employee retention during Musk's tenure. Making Twitter a less pleasant place to work won't help. Moreover, refusing to pay contractually obligated expenses is "take your company away from you and sell it for scrap"-level illegal. Having already been on the wrong side of the SEC and with a possible FTC investigation looming, Elon Musk has shown a worrying willingness to play chicken with law enforcement. For stakeholders seriously committed to Twitter as a digital public square, antics like this threaten the value of the platform and discourage potential collaborators.

What Elon Musk's destruction of Twitter tells us about the future of social media

Story by Blayne Haggart, 
Associate Professor of Political Science, 
Brock University • Monday,  
Nov. 21,2022
THE CONVERSATION

Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter has been a fast-moving disaster. It has also created a tangible problem for journalists, politicians, activists and academic scholars: Where do we talk to each other if or when Twitter finally collapses or becomes unusable?



Since its beginnings in 2006, Twitter has grown into one of the most important social networks in the world.© (Shutterstock)

It’s a useful question. Contemplating life without Twitter pushes us to look beyond Twitter’s odious underbelly to consider what we liked about it. In doing so, it can help us understand better what social media is, for better and worse, and to consider what we want it to be.

Twitter communities

What I will miss about Twitter is its large scale and reach. It has become the default way for so many groups to communicate with each other and, because it’s basically just one big message board, across groups.

Social media companies regularly argue that this scale is why there is so much hate speech and disinformation on their networks. As harmful as this speech may be, Twitter’s reach has nonetheless been a boon for, say, emerging researchers wanting to easily reach the largest number of their peers.

Smaller online communities are fantastic for any number of reasons. They allow members to share their interests and knowledge. Their smaller size makes them easier to moderate effectively. However, their smallness can also inhibit the serendipity of running into ideas that you wouldn’t otherwise see.

Furthermore, smaller online communities still depend on the benevolence of whoever happens to be in charge of the server. Twitter’s open design somewhat mitigates against the formation of strict hierarchies among groups on the platform, although as we’re learning, commercial social media still leaves us subject to the owner’s whims.

The end of Twitter


Thinking about where to go after Twitter also highlights that social media networks are not substitutes for each other. Well, they are for advertisers, who will go wherever the audience is. But people use different social media for different purposes.

As an academic, TikTok has nothing to offer me in terms of creating and sharing knowledge with my peers. The Twitter-like Mastodon may allow for easier communication among colleagues, but it lacks Twitter’s out-of-community reach.

That there is no equivalent substitute for Twitter highlights that there is a strong public interest in fostering public social media, to provide communities with stable communication infrastructure.

Relatedly, this debacle also confirms that advertising does not provide a sustainable business model for socially responsible social media. Twitter has only turned a profit in two of its 16 yearsAdvertisers are currently abandoning Twitter in the face of Musk’s content-moderation follies which, combined with Musk’s incompetence, could drive the company into bankruptcy.

Related video: Is Twitter descending into chaos?

View on Watch



Elon Musk demands all Twitter employees email him weekly updates on their work

Most important, however, its ad-based business model is based on the viral spread of content designed to engage our attention at any cost, be it bullying, harassment or hate speech. As journalism professor Yumi Wilson notes, “Twitter was a scary place even before Elon.”

Life after Twitter


All this suggests that we need to think seriously about how to move beyond ad-funded social media. Mastodon on its own offers a decentralized, community-based paradigm. However, depending on the long-term commitment of volunteers and small operators is itself a recipe for instability.

Read more: People are leaving Twitter for Mastodon, but are they ready for democratic social media?

Much more interesting is the proposal that Mastodon-based services could be used by an arm’s length public agency like the CBC to publicly fund stable, well-run social media.



Social media platforms, like Twitter, rely on the attention economy to make profits.
© (Shutterstock)

Searchability


Finally, we need to talk about search engines. Twitter is valuable in part because it allows individuals to broadcast easily to a large audience. Without large-scale social media, we’re back to the problem of how to discover other people’s work and how to get your work in front of an audience.

Search engines have flown under the radar in our discussions about how platforms should be governed. If we want to reduce online platform power and make the best information easily locatable, we need to reconsider whether our current search engines are good enough.

There is cause for concern: Google’s gold-standard search engine has been “getting worse,” in large part because the company has been clogging its results with advertising that makes it more difficult for users to find relevant information. Given that the big online platforms continue to rely heavily on advertising revenues, this is a problem that will worsen.

Let’s not glorify Twitter. It is, in many ways and for many people, a malevolent force. Even pre-Musk, it was a breeding ground for harassment, particularly of women and individuals from marginalized groups. It can enable often life-ruining bullying and disproportionate public shaming of otherwise private individuals, particularly through the quote-tweet function.

Twitter has had a negative effect on the quality of our social discourse, serving as a conduit for mis- and disinformation, designed to encourage outrage rather than substantive conversation.

As bad as it was — and is — you don’t know what you got till it’s gone. Twitter pre-Musk was no paradise, but Musk’s rampage allows us to see both the good and bad in social media as it currently exists. And, as a result, to consider what we want (and need) social media to be.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts.

Read more:

Why it may not matter whether Elon Musk broke US labor laws with his mass firings at Twitter

Blayne Haggart receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. He is a Senior Fellow with the Centre for International Governance Innovation.

The age of the toxic boss is over: Workers aren't willing to suffer for a paycheque anymore

Story by Victoria Wells • Yesterday 


Hundreds of Twitter's employees headed for the exits after Elon Musk issued an ultimatum: get ready to work© Provided by Financial Post

If Elon Musk ‘s disastrous takeover of Twitter Inc. has proven anything, it’s that the time of the heavy-handed boss is well and truly behind us. Workers just aren’t willing to suffer for a paycheque, and they’ll quit to prove it, as Musk found out last week.

Hundreds of Twitter’s employees headed for the exits after Musk issued an ultimatum: get ready to work “long hours at high intensity” or leave with a three-month severance package. People overwhelmingly decided to quit. Before the 5 p.m. Thursday deadline, internal Slack channels were flooded with staffers posting emojis of blue hearts and salutes as they said goodbye. Sensing the impending wave, Musk tried to convince some workers he considered essential to stay on, according to a report in the New York Times . He failed. The employees he had been lobbying in a video meeting all logged off at 5 p.m. while he was still making his case.

The exodus was so great that on Friday, #RIPTwitter started trending as users became certain the platform would crumble with few engineers left to patch the cracks. Twitter’s workforce has been cut to the bone since Musk got the keys at the end of October. He immediately laid off 3,700 workers, or roughly half its workforce, and then fired many more, reportedly getting rid of anyone who dared criticize him.

The mass resignations should have been a wakeup call for Musk, who has often bet on wielding power over his employees by threatening to fire them if they don’t toe the line. At Tesla Inc., he put an end to remote work , ordered staff back to the office and fired those who refused. He issued a similar directive at Twitter, only to later walk it back in an effort to staunch the bleeding of workers.

That could be a sign Musk is beginning to learn what most other bosses have discovered during a time of labour shortages and sky-high job vacancies: don’t underestimate the power of the worker. That power is likely to stay where it is for longer than some expect, because hiring challenges will persist for years, says a workplace trends report from Indeed, a job postings site, and Glassdoor, with an aging population the main driver of shortages in Canada.

Hybrid work is the future, but expect to be in the office more often than not

“What is critical for leaders to understand is that these changes and shifts are not temporary. There will be no return to ‘normal’ that many seem to be awaiting,” Svenja Gudell, Indeed’s chief economist, says in a news release .

That means bosses will have to give workers what they want if they hope to avoid more hiring problems. And what they want shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention these past few years: flexibility, higher pay, better benefits, the ability to work from home, workplace well-being policies and diversity strategies.


Employers in Canada seem to be paying attention. Job listings for remote work are on the rise, making up 11.2 per cent of all postings in September on Indeed. That’s four times the pre-pandemic rate, and a sign of things to come. “Remote work is here to stay,” Brendon Bernard, senior economist at Indeed Canada, says in a blog posting .

Meanwhile, employees are finished with toxic work environments. Almost half of employees in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom expect a level of happiness at work, says Indeed’s latest workplace well-being study . Those who are content with their work environment are also much less likely to leave their current employer for greener pastures — just ask any recent ex-Twitter employee.

At this point, no worker with any pride is going to subject themselves to a boss who demands intense overtime, little work-life balance and unnecessary full-time office mandates, especially if their skills are in high demand. There’s a better way, and employees have seen it in action. In many cases, they’ve lived it.

Layoffs have hit some companies, but there are still close to a record million job vacancies in Canada. There’s always another job out there offering better benefits, flexibility or the opportunity to work from home a few days a week. Bosses better figure that out or else they could find themselves holding the reins to the shell of a company, not unlike a certain seemingly oblivious billionaire.