Tuesday, August 06, 2024

 Bangladesh’s Sheikh Hasina to ‘seek asylum in UK’ despite calls for probe into her protest crackdown


British foreign secretary David Lammy calls for UN-led investigation into deadly protests and loss of lives in Bangladesh

Shweta Sharma
Aug 5, 2024


Bangladeh’s former prime minister Sheikh Hasina is reportedly awaiting confirmation from the UK on her request for political asylum after being forced to flee the country on a military helicopter due to widespread violence.

Ms Hasina, 76, arrived in neighbouring India on Monday, moments before angry protesters stormed into her residence demanding her resignation after more than two decades in the country’s politics.

Anger mounted against the Hasina government after protests against a quota system in government jobs met with harsh repression by government forces, killing more than 400 people.

After landing in India’s northeastern city of Agartala, Ms Hasina arrived in New Delhi with her sister and requested asylum from the British government, according to CNN-News18.

However, Ms Hasina has been forced to extend her stay in New Delhi as she has received no confirmation from the UK, sources told the broadcaster.

Indian foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar told parliament on Tuesday that Ms Hasina requested approval to arrive in India at very short notice and her request for was approved “for the moment”.

“We simultaneously received a request for flight clearance from the Bangladesh authorities. She arrived yesterday evening in Delhi,” he said.

He said the Indian government has been in regular touch with the Dhaka authorities for the last 24 hours.

“I seek the understanding and support of the House in regard to sensitive issues regarding an important neighbour on which there has always been a strong national consensus,” he said.

Ms Hasina is accompanied by her younger sister Sheikh Rehana, who holds British citizenship. Ms Rehana’s daughter Tulip Siddiq is a member of the British parliament for the Labor Party.

The embattled leader’s request from the UK is in limbo as British foreign secretary David Lammy has called for a UN-led investigation into the deadly protests and “tragic” loss of lives in Bangladesh.

Mr Lammy said in a statement the UK and Bangladesh have “deep people-to-people links and shared Commonwealth values”.

“All sides now need to work together to end the violence, restore calm, de-escalate the situation and prevent any further loss of life.

“The people of Bangladesh deserve a full and independent UN-led investigation into the events of the past few weeks.”

He described violence in Bangladesh as “unprecedented” as he set out the UK’s ambition for Bangladesh to reach a “peaceful and democratic future”.

The UK and the Indian government have given no official statements on the developments.

The protest over the quota system, which reserved a third of civil service jobs for descendants of veterans of the country’s 1971 independence war with Pakistan, was the sternest challenge to her 15 years in power.

The protests that began in late June turned deadly after her government issued nationwide shoot-on-sight policy, imposed frequent communication blackouts and curfews across the country as students hit the streets.

Most of the quota was scaled back after the Supreme Court ruling last month in favour of students but protests continued as people demanded accountability for the deaths of those killed.

On Monday, 135 more people were killed across Bangladesh in incidents of police firing, clashes and arson as hundreds of thousands participated in the march called to Dhaka by protest leaders, reported the Dhaka Tribune.

Widespread incidents of looting, vandalism and arson were reported in parts of the country along with reports of escalated attacks on Hindu minorities.

The US government commended Bangladesh’s Army for its "restraint" and called for an interim government that is democratic.

"The United States has long called for respecting democratic rights in Bangladesh, and we urge that the interim government formation be democratic and inclusive. We commend the Army for the restraint they have showed today," a White House spokesperson said on Monday.

The EU also urged an "orderly and peaceful transition" towards a new democratically elected government in the country.

Ms Hasina’s son Sajeeb Wazed Joy and her allies have said she would not return to politics.

"She’s in her late 70s. She is so disappointed that after all her hard work, for a minority to rise up against her, I think she’s done,” her son told BBC.

Ms Hasina is known as the “iron lady” of Bangladesh who has spent a total of 20 years in office after first coming to power in 1996.

This is the second time she has been forced into exile in her life. She first went into exile after her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the freedom fighter who founded Bangladesh, was assassinated along with her mother and three brothers in 1975.


Bangladesh transition: After 15 years entrenched in power, Sheikh Hasina fades away

BenarNews staff
2024.08.06
Dhaka, Washington and Bangkok


Bangladesh transition: After 15 years entrenched in power, Sheikh Hasina fades awayBangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina greets journalists in Dhaka after official election results gave her a third straight term, Dec. 31, 2018. Anupam Nath/AP file photo

When protesters ransacked Sheikh Hasina’s official residence and set fire to a museum honoring her assassinated father – Bangladesh’s founding leader – they symbolically bid good riddance to the rule of its longest-serving prime minister, whose rise to power was inextricably tied to him.

Hasina, 76, one of two women to have served as Bangladesh’s prime minister, resigned and fled the country on Monday. In a stunning turn of events, the army chief announced that she had stepped down, as student-led protesters converged on the capital Dhaka again to demand her government’s ouster after 15 years of consecutive rule, which saw it drift toward authoritarianism. 

Hasina, whose supporters had dubbed her “the mother of humanity,” quit office amid a shaky economy and only seven months after her government was elected to a fourth consecutive term in power and fifth overall. 

However, there were widespread allegations that the polls were skewed in favor of her ruling Awami League party. The main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by her bitter enemy Khaleda Zia, had boycotted the Jan. 7 general election after Hasina refused to make way for a caretaker government to oversee the electoral process.

Since taking office in 2009, Hasina had led the South Asian nation of 170 million people on a track of mostly robust economic growth. But in recent years, she drew international scrutiny for an increasingly iron-fisted style and a record overshadowed by allegations of enforced disappearances and arrests of journalists and critics.

“If I’ve made any mistakes along the way, my request to you will be to look at the matter with the eyes of forgiveness,” Hasina told the nation in a televised address back in January as she sought re-election. “If I can form the government again, I will get a chance to correct the mistakes.”

BD-Hasina-2(2).jpg
Protesters try to demolish a large statue of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, father of Bangladesh leader Sheikh Hasina and the nation’s founding leader, after she resigned as prime minister, in Dhaka, Aug. 5, 2024. [Rajib Dhar/AP]

Hasina’s life as a politician was born in the wake of bullets fired by assassins. 

She formally took over the Awami League six years after her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, her mother and other family members were gunned down during a coup in 1975.

By a stroke of luck, she escaped being killed alongside them. She and her sister were traveling abroad during the assassination of Rahman, who had led the Bangladeshi independence movement in the 1971 war against Pakistan.

“I stepped into politics to fulfill my father’s dream,” Hasina told the nation during her electoral speech in January.

Hasina saw it as her mission to carry on with the legacy of her late father, who was widely revered as a national hero in Bangladesh’s struggle for independence. In 2021-22, her government spent many millions of U.S. dollars to commemorate his memory and mark the 50th year of nationhood.

BD-Hasina-3(2).jpg
Bengali nationalist leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman walks towards a battery of microphones to address an estimated 1 million people at a rally at the Race Course Ground in Dhaka, Jan. 11, 1972. Mujibur, the first leader of independent Bangladesh and the father of current Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, was assassinated in a military coup in August 1975. [Michel Laurent/AP file photo]

As the milestone anniversary approached, it became increasingly dangerous to speak freely about Bangladesh’s founding father, because his daughter’s government had instituted strict laws against defaming him in an effort to control the historical narrative, analysts said.

But Rahman, who was also known as Sheikh Mujib, slid into his own brand of autocratic rule after becoming the leader of the young nation. A year before he was assassinated, Rahman banned all political parties and the majority of the press, and formed a Chinese Communist Party-style one-party system called Bakshal.

The widespread anti-Hasina protests that began last month and culminated in her ouster on Aug. 5 stemmed from anger vented by students over quotas for government jobs that heavily favored children and grandchildren of veterans who had fought on Mujibur’s side in the 1971 war against Pakistan.

The deadly protests persisted although the nation’s supreme court moved to slash the quotas and make applications for most government jobs merit-based in the country where there is a high jobless rate among young people.

Start of political career

In 1981, Hasina returned to Bangladesh from exile in India shortly after being elected president of the Awami League. At the time, the country was ruled by President Ziaur Rahman, a military general who a few years earlier had founded the BNP.

Ziaur Rahman was killed in a coup days after Hasina returned, allowing another army general, Hussain Muhammad Ershad, to grab power. 

Hasina collaborated with the BNP’s Khaleda Zia – Ziaur Rahman’s widow – to oust Ershad in a civilian mass movement.

In 1996, when the BNP held an election defying Hasina’s demand that a neutral caretaker government oversee the polls, she led opposition parties to boycott the election. 

The BNP returned to power virtually unopposed – similar to her latest victory on Jan. 7 – but the Awami League’s constant street agitations forced Zia’s government to resign and call for fresh elections under a newly constituted caretaker system.

In that election, Hasina became prime minister for the first time.

Her party became known for aggressive and relentless political tactics, even when it was relegated to the opposition again in 2001. Frequent nationwide strikes and road blockades called by the Awami League kept the BNP government on the back foot. 


RELATED STORIES

Sheikh Hasina: A Portrait of Power

50 Years After Independence, History is a Risky Subject in Bangladesh 

Sheikh Hasina’s unyielding reign 

Bangladesh’s Hasina tightens grip as ‘dream of multiparty democracy shattered


Hasina’s political life was also marked by direct threats of violence against her. 

According to the Awami League’s tally, she survived as many as 19 assassination attempts, the most recent of which occurred in 2004. In that incident, she narrowly escaped a grenade attack that killed more than a dozen people. 

When elections approached in 2006, Hasina’s party again boycotted the polls, claiming that the BNP manipulated the caretaker system. Bloody street battles that ensued enabled the military to intervene in 2007, and she took a victory parade. But the new military-backed government placed both Hasina and Zia in jail on corruption charges. 

Both were released a year later to contest the election in 2008, which Hasina won in a landslide.

BD-Hasina-4(1).jpg
Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina speaks at the opening session of the national parliament, in Dhaka, July 14, 1996. [Pavel Rahman, AP file photo]

In more recent years, Hasina was widely credited for tackling the problem of Muslim extremism in Bangladesh, especially after groups such as the Islamic State and al-Qaeda carried out killings of secular writers and bloggers in the country. However, the country’s deadliest-ever terrorist attack, an overnight siege of a cafĂ© by pro-IS militants that left at least 20 dead, occurred under her watch.

Meanwhile, allegations about security forces carrying out extrajudicial killings kept surfacing. An ostensive anti-drug drive in 2018, an election year, left more than 400 people dead, according to local and international human rights groups.

It was in 2018 that the government relaunched an internet law and made it harsher. The Digital Security Act would go on to target journalists and social media speech disproportionately, stifle a climate for unfettered expression and lead to arrests of critics of her government.


Muslim scholars urge Bangladesh Army to hold transparent elections after premier flees country


Bangladesh’s military chief announces transitional government following resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina

Anadolu staff |06.08.2024 - 

Anti-government protestors gather at the parliament house in Dhaka

ANKARA

A group of Muslim scholars urged the Bangladesh Army on Monday to protect the country and hold transparent elections.

The International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) issued the statement after Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina resigned and fled to India amid violent student protests over government job quotas.

IUMS expressed solidarity with the Bangladeshi people, urging the army to transfer power to an interim civilian government until transparent elections are held.

The statement also called on the people to preserve order and prevent any attacks on the state and private property.

According to media reports, protesters set fire to government buildings and the headquarters of the ruling Awami League party in the capital, Dhaka.

Early on Monday, Bangladesh military chief Gen. Waker-uz-Zaman announced a transitional government after Hasina fled the country.

Bangladesh has witnessed large-scale protests since early July that began as university student-led demonstrations against controversial civil service job quotas. Local media reported around 400 deaths during the protests.

*Writing by Ahmed Asmar

 Canada calls for peaceful return to democratic, inclusive govt in Bangladesh


ByAnirudh Bhattacharyya
Aug 06, 2024 

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina resigned and left the country after weeks of quota protests turned violent leaving hundreds dead

Toronto: The Canadian government has called for a “quick and peaceful return to a democratic and inclusive civilian-led government in Bangladesh” in a statement on Monday evening following the departure of Sheikh Hasina, the Prime Minister, fleeing Dhaka and an interim dispensation assuming charge.

Anti-government protesters celebrate outside the Bangladesh Parliament after getting the news of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's resignation, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on Monday (AP)

In a statement released by Global Affairs Canada, the country’s foreign ministry, Minister of Foreign Affairs Melanie Joly said, “As a country committed to democracy, inclusive governance and the rule of law, Canada calls for a quick and peaceful return to a democratic and inclusive civilian-led government in Bangladesh. We urge the people of Bangladesh to unite around the principles of freedom and democracy upon which their country was founded.”

Sheikh Hasina resigned and left the country after weeks of quota protests turned violent leaving hundreds dead.

“Respect for fundamental human rights, including freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly, are critical for democratic governance and to build peaceful and prosperous societies,” Joly added.

Ottawa also urged all parties to “respect and uphold democratic institutions and processes and the rule of law” and “a full and impartial investigation” into the crimes committed during the tumultuous phase.

“Canada strongly condemns the human rights violations, deaths, torture, arbitrary arrests and lethal force used against the people of Bangladesh in recent weeks. We reiterate our deep condolences to all those impacted,” Joly said, while calling for maintenance of full Internet access in the country.

Meanwhile, Canadian MP Shuvaloy Majumdar, who is of Bengali heritage, posted on X that he shared “the anxiety so many Canadian Bengalis are now experiencing, and call for calm and stability in Bangladesh”.

“Bangladesh today descends into the anarchy and atrocities deeply reminiscent of my own family’s experience more than fifty years ago. Religious minorities - Bengali Hindus and Christians - are once again subjected to mobs burning people, homes, businesses, mandirs, and places of worship. Violent mobs are also attacking Muslims, who today as they did a half century ago, show great courage in the protection of their neighbours,” he said in the post.

Referring to the period right before Bangladesh was liberated from Pakistan, he said, “The evil that once descended upon my family - murdering millions and displacing tens of millions - must not be permitted to rise again.”

Families wait as some political prisoners freed in Bangladesh

By AFP
August 6, 2024


Bangladesh's ousted prime minster Sheikh Hasina fled the country by helicopter on Monday, ending 15 years of autocratic rule - Copyright AFP Munir UZ ZAMAN

Families of political prisoners secretly jailed in Bangladesh under the autocratic rule of ousted premier Sheikh Hasina waited desperately Tuesday for news of their relatives, as some of those missing were released.

“We need answers,” said Sanjida Islam Tulee, a coordinator of Mayer Daak, meaning “The Call of the Mothers”, a group campaigning for the release of people detained by Hasina’s security forces.

Rights groups accused Hasina’s security forces of abducting and disappearing some 600 people — including many from the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the banned Jamaat-e-Islami, the country’s largest Islamist party.

Tulee told AFP that at least 20 families gathered outside a military intelligence force building in a northern Dhaka neighbourhood, waiting for news of their relatives.

Army chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman announced Monday that Hasina had resigned after weeks of deadly protests, and the military would form a caretaker government.

Hours later President Mohammed Shahabuddin — after a meeting with the army chief — said it had been decided to free all those arrested during the student protests, as well as key opposition leader Khaleda Zia.

Ex-prime minister Zia, 78, chairperson of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) is in poor health and was largely under house arrest after being sentenced to 17 years in prison for graft in 2018.

– ‘What happened to others?’ –


Among the most high profile of those released on Tuesday was opposition activist and lawyer Ahmad Bin Quasem, son of Mir Quasem Ali, the executed leader of Jamaat-e-Islami.

“He was released from secret detention this morning,” family friend and relative Masum Khalili told AFP. “He had a medical check-up, his condition is stable.”

Quasem, a British-educated barrister, was abducted — allegedly by security forces in plainclothes — in August 2016.

Security forces during Hasina’s rule were accused of detaining tens of thousands of opposition activists, killing hundreds in extrajudicial encounters, and disappearing their leaders and supporters.

Human Rights Watch last year said security forces had committed “over 600 enforced disappearances” since Hasina came to power in 2009, and nearly 100 remain unaccounted for.

Hasina’s government denied the allegations of disappearances and extrajudicial killings, saying some of those reported missing drowned in the Mediterranean while trying to reach Europe.

“We heard Ahmad Bin Quasem has been released,” Tulee said, “but what happened to others?”


Bangladesh protesters call for new govt under Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus


Yunus is a social entrepreneur, banker, economist and civil society leader who was awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for founding Grameen Bank and pioneering concepts of microcredit and microfinance in the South Asian nation.


AFP
Yunus says Hasina ouster by student-led protests "is like a second liberation for the people of Bangladesh." / Photo: AFP Archive


Bangladesh student protest coordinators have called for the formation of a new interim government with Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus as its chief adviser, according to a video released by the coordinators on Facebook.

Student leaders, who spearheaded a movement against job quotas that turned into a call for Sheikh Hasina to resign, said early on Tuesday that they want a new interim government with Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus as its chief adviser.

"Any government other than the one we recommended would not be accepted," Nahid Islam, one of the organisers of the student movement, said in a video on Facebook with three other organisers.

"We wouldn't accept any army-supported or army-led government."

"We have also had discussions with Muhammad Yunus and he has agreed to take on this responsibility at our invitation," Islam added.

Yunus is a Bangladeshi social entrepreneur, banker, economist and civil society leader who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for founding the Grameen Bank and pioneering the concepts of microcredit and microfinance.

Yunus told Indian media on Monday that Hasina's ouster by student-led protests "is like a second liberation for the people of Bangladesh."

"We were an occupied country as long as she (Hasina) was there. She was behaving like an occupation force, a dictator, a general, controlling everything. Today all the people of Bangladesh feel liberated."

The demand comes after PM Hasina resigned and fled the country to India, ending her 15-year rule amid deadly protests.

Bangladesh's Army Chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman said in a broadcast to the nation on state television that Hasina had resigned and the military would form a caretaker government.

"The country has suffered a lot, the economy has been hit, many people have been killed — it is time to stop the violence," said Waker, shortly after jubilant crowds stormed and looted Hasina's official residence.

Zaman plans to meet the protest coordinators at 12 pm local time (0600 GMT) on Tuesday, the army separately said in a statement.



Weeks of unrest

Zaman said he had held talks with leaders of major political parties — excluding Hasina's long-ruling Awami League — to discuss the way ahead and was due to hold talks with the President Mohammed Shahabuddin .

An interim government will hold elections as soon as possible after consulting all parties and stakeholders, President Shahabuddin said in a televised address late on Monday.

The weeks of protests had begun peacefully as frustrated students demanded an end to a quota system for government jobs, but they turned into an unprecedented uprising against Hasina and her ruling Awami League party.

Anger also lingered from January's election, which saw the jailing of thousands of opposition members.

The government responded to the protests with force, leaving nearly 300 people dead and fuelling further outrage.

Bangladesh has a long history of coups.

The military declared an emergency in January 2007 after widespread political unrest and installed a military-backed caretaker government for two years.

Hasina then ruled Bangladesh from 2009 and won her fourth consecutive election in January after a vote without genuine opposition.

Rights groups accused her government of misusing state institutions to entrench its hold on power and stamp out dissent, including through the extrajudicial killing of opposition activists.

SOURCE: TRTWorld and agencies


Bangladesh: Students want interim govt

with Muhammad Yunus as chief adviser

Development announced by Students against Discrimination coordinators Movement.

Islam, Asif Mahmud and Abu Bakr Mazumdar
Tuesday. They also released a video statement
Arnab Ganguly Calcutta Published 06.08.24
 
Dr Muhammad Yunus.X/@czverse

Nobel laureate Dr Muhammad Yunus will be the chief adviser to the interim government in Bangladesh.

This was announced by Students against Discrimination coordinators Mo. Nahid Islam, Asif Mahmud and Abu Bakr Mazumdar at 4.40 am (Bangladesh time) on Tuesday. They also released a video statement.

“We had taken 24 hours to propose our interim government. Given the emergency situation, we are now announcing its outline. We have decided to form an interim government with Nobel laureate Dr. Muhammad Yunus as the chief adviser, who is universally accepted and internationally renowned,” read the statement. “We have already spoken with Dr Yunus, and he has agreed to take on this crucial responsibility at the call of the student community to save Bangladesh.”

The students have urged Bangladesh President Mohammad Shahabuddin to announce the government.


Youths guarding a temple at Comilla.Sourced by the correspondent

“We appeal to the President to quickly form the interim government with Dr Muhammad Yunus as the chief advisor. We will announce the names of the other members of this interim government by this morning,” read the statement. “We want to see the formation process of this government by this morning.”

Former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina faced with an unprecedented countrywide students movement that left over 300 dead in three weeks resigned and fled from Bangladesh on Monday afternoon, with the Army taking over the reins of the government with the promise of an interim government.

President Shahabuddin had late on Monday dissolved the Parliament and ordered the release of the former prime minister and BNP chief Khaleda Zia, who was under house arrest.

"A decision has been taken to form an interim government as soon as possible by dissolving parliament. The army will also take measures to normalise the prevailing anarchic situation," said the president, in a televised address, with the chiefs of the three services standing behind him.

Since the departure of Sheikh Hasina – who is at the Hindon air base near Delhi – Bangladesh has seen massive violence targeting those close to the Awami League and also against minorities.

Actor Shanto Khan and his father Salim Khan, chairman of the Lakshmipur Union board were killed on Monday night. Violence has been reported from several parts of Dhaka, Jessore, Chandpur, Kushthia, Baniachang, Sibalaya, Sripur, Chuadanga, Jhinaidaa, Ghazipur, Shariyatpur and Koyra.

"I am directing the armed forces to take stern measures to protect the lives and properties of the people and state assets. I call upon all to come forward to ensure communal harmony, security of minorities and protect government property," the president said.

He said those involved in killing and violence will be brought to justice through impartial investigation.

All offices and courts in the country will open from Tuesday, he added.

"Let's work together to save the country. I humbly call upon all to play their role from their respective positions to advance the country rising above mutual envy and animosity," he added.

Students claimed there was an attempt to sabotage the uprising.

“We can see that after our uprising and revolution, the fascists and their accomplices are causing chaos and sabotage. In various places, shootings are taking place, temples are being attacked, and there is sabotage and looting. We believe that these incidents are being orchestrated to undermine our students' and citizens' revolution. We urge the Dear students-citizen striving for freedom to remain vigilant and cautious,” the statement said.

After Hasina’s departure, people had raided her official residence Gana Bhaban and took away her personal belongings that included printer cartridges. Refrigerators, television sets, furniture, lamps and even a car were damaged.

Muhammad Yunus: 5 facts about possible 

chief advisor of Bangladesh interim govt

ByHT News Desk
Aug 06, 2024

Muhammad Yunus won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in micro-finance in 2006 and revolutionised the field of micro-lending through his Grameen Bank.

Former Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina's resignation and her escape into India on Monday following the government job quota protests by the students community in the country is the beginning to a new chapter of the country's turbulent political history since its formation in 1971 following a brutal Liberation War.



With still over 100 charges in his name, Yunus was sentenced to six months in jail by the court in January but was granted bail in March..(AFP)

LIVE COVERAGE OF EVENTS IN BANGLADESH

Mohammed Shahabuddin, Bangladesh President, announced an interim government to be formed soon after the parliament is dissolved and has also ordered the release of former prime minister Khaleda Zia.

ALSO READ | Bangladesh's turbulent political history: 5 facts

Amidst this political turmoil, the student protesters have proposed Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus to be the chief adviser for the suggested interim government, in a Facebook video which was posted on Tuesday early morning.

“We have decided that internationally renowned Nobel laureate Dr Muhammad Yunus will be appointed as the chief advisor in the interim government, and we have also spoken with Dr Muhammad Yunus. He has agreed to take on this significant responsibility in response to the call of the students and public to safeguard Bangladesh,” said Nahid Islam, a key coordinator of the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement which spearheaded the protests.


Who is Muhammad Yunus?


Here are five facts about him.


Muhammad Yunus was born on 28 June 1940 in Chittagong, Bangladesh, in a well-off family with his father being a successful goldsmith. He finished his UG and PG at the Dhaka University in Bangladesh and then received a Fulbright scholarship to study economics at Vanderbilt University where received his Ph.D in 1969. In the following year, he became an assistant professor at Middle Tennessee State University before returning to Bangladesh, where he headed the economics department of Chittagong University.


(ALSO READ | ‘…like a dictator’: Bangladesh Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus reacts to Sheikh Hasina's resignation)

In 1983, Muhammad Yunus established the Grameen Bank which was founded on the belief that “credit is a fundamental human right". Its objective was to help poor people escape poverty by providing loans to them on terms suitable to them and by teaching them a few sound financial principles so they could help themselves. What started out as small amounts of money as personal loans to basketweavers in his home country, developed into a world movement revolutionising finances through micro-lending.

Muhammad Yunus won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in micro-finance in 2006 and has also won numerous other accolades such as the US Presidential Medal of Freedom, Congressional Gold Medal, Mohamed Shabdeen Award for Science (1993), Sri Lanka; Humanitarian Award (1993), CARE, USA; World Food Prize (1994), World Food Prize Foundation, USA; lndependence Day Award (1987), Bangladesh’s highest award; King Hussein Humanitarian Leadership Award (2000), King Hussien Foundation and so on. He also served as a board member of the United Nations Foundation from 1998 to 2021.
In 2007,


Muhammad Yunus announced plans to set up his own "Citizen Power" party in attempt change the political culture of Bangladesh but was plagued with troubles due to instability and periods of military rule.

This ‘banker to the poor’ also had his share of legal troubles from the regime, since Hasina returned to power in 2008. He was slapped with a series of criminal cases and accused of promoting homosexuality in a smear campaign led by the state. Bangladesh government forced him out Grameen Bank in 2011 and in 2022 he was hit with embezzlement charges. With still over 100 charges in his name, Yunus was sentenced to six months in jail by the court in January but was granted bail in March.



Key Role Likely For Muhammad Yunus In

New Bangladesh Interim Govt

All About The Nobel Laureate

Amid the unrest and uncertainty, student leaders have called on the Army and President to include Dr. Muhammad  Yunus in a leading role.


Outlook Web Desk
Updated on: 6 August 2024


Nobel Laureate Muhammed Yunus Likely To Be Chief Adivsor | Photo: AP

Following the abrupt resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the Bangladesh army is working with the President and the opposition parties to form an interim government as soon as possible.

The interim government is expected to be announced soon which will also give insight as to who will take over as the prime minister of the nation. Amid the unrest and uncertainty, student leaders have called on the Army and President to include Dr. Muhammad Yunus in a leading role.

Track the latest and LIVE Updates on Bangladesh Protests on Outlook India

The coordinators of the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement in Bangladesh took to social media to announce that the Nobel Laureate will take on the role of the Chief Advisor.

While this development is yet to be confirmed by the President, student leaders added that Yunus has agreed to take on the responsibility and be part of the interim government.

"We have decided that the interim government would be formed in which internationally renowned Nobel Laureate Dr Mohammad Yunus, who has wide acceptability, would be the chief adviser,” student leader Nahid Islam was quoted as saying by the Daily Star.

Bangladesh Protests: Parliament Dissolved; Sheikh Hasina Likely To Seek Asylum In UK | Top Points
BY Outlook Web Desk

Bangladesh swirled into chaos after Awami League Chief Sheikh Hasina resigned as the prime minister and fled the country amid deadly unrest.


Shortly after Hasina fled to India, protestors stormed into Ganabhaban - the official residence of the leader. Army Chief Waker-Uz-Zaman confirmed the resignation and urged for an end to the violence.


The Army Chief added that an interim government will be formed to oversee the diplomatic, social and economic relations of the state.

Who Is Dr Muhammad Yunus?

Dr Muhammad Yunus is a social entrepreneur, banker, economist and civil society leader. In 2006, Yunus rose to international prominence after he and Grameen Bank received the Nobel Peace Prize for their work in microcredit and microfinance.

Under Grameen Bank, small loans to underserved entrepreneurs were given and they were empowered to achieve economic and social development despite limited access to traditional banking services.

Apart from the Nobel, Yunus has been a recipient of various international awards such as the United States Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2009 and the Congressional Gold Medal in 2010


Who is Nahid Islam, the soft-spoken sociology student behind Bangladesh’s revolution against PM Hasina?


Nahid Islam (centre) spearheaded a movement against job quotas that turned into a call for Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to resign. — Reuters pic

Tuesday, 06 Aug 2024 

DHAKA, Aug 6 — Often seen in public with a Bangladeshi flag tied across his forehead, Nahid Islam is a soft-spoken sociology student who spearheaded the protest that ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina after 15 straight years in power

Islam, 26, was the coordinator of a student movement against quotas in government jobs that morphed into an oust-Hasina campaign. He rose to national fame in mid-July after police detained him and some other Dhaka University students as the protests turned deadly.

Nearly 300 people, many of them college and university students, were killed in weeks of violence across the country that only abated when Hasina resigned and fled to neighbouring India on Monday.

Islam and other student leaders were due to meet army chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman at noon (0600 GMT) on Tuesday. Zaman had announced Hasina’s resignation and said an interim government would be formed.

Islam, who speaks unemotionally but firmly in public, has said the students would not accept any government led or supported by the army and has proposed that Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus be the chief adviser.

“Any government other than the one we recommended would not be accepted,” he said in a Facebook post early on Tuesday.

On Monday, flanked by other student leaders, the bearded and stocky Islam told reporters: “We won’t betray the blood shed by the martyrs for our cause.

“We will create a new democratic Bangladesh through our promise of security of life, social justice and a new political landscape.”

He vowed to ensure the country of 170 million never returns to what he called “Fascist rule” and asked fellow students to protect its Hindu minority and their places of worship.

Islam, who was born in Dhaka in 1998, is married and has a younger brother, Nakib. His father is a teacher and his mother a homemaker.

“He has incredible stamina and always said the country needed to change,” Nakib Islam, a geography student, told Reuters. “He was picked up by the police, tortured until he was unconscious, and then dumped on the road. Despite all this, he continues to fight. We have confidence that he will not give up. Proud of him.”

Sabrina Karim, associate professor of government at Cornell University who specialises in studying political violence, called Monday a historic day for Bangladesh.

“This might very well be the first successful Gen Z-led revolution,” she said. “There is perhaps some optimism for a democratic transition even if the military is involved in the process.” — Reuters

Occupying Hasina's bed, eating her fish: How

palaces are looted as regimes fall

When kingdoms fall, and rulers flee, their residences become amusement parks for commoners. Protesters stormed and ransacked Ganabhaban, the PM's residence in Dhaka, after Sheikh Hasina left Bangladesh amid protests. The siege of palaces was also seen when regimes fell in Sri Lanka, Iraq and Afghanistan.


Bangladesh became the latest in a series of countries where people stormed the leader's house. This was also seen in Sri Lanka, Iraq and Afghanistan. (Image: X/Reuters/AP)

Priyanjali Narayan
New Delhi
UPDATED: Aug 6, 2024 

In ShortProtestors have entered the PM's house in Bangladesh and are sitting on the bed
This has also happened in other countries where rulers had to resign amid protests
People earlier had entered presidential palaces in Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Iraq

When kingdoms fall, the palace gates are swung wide open. And when rulers flee, protesters enter the palaces with all their might. In Dhaka, protesters did exactly that. They entered Ganabhaban, the PM's residence, after Sheikh Hasina tendered her resignation and left the nation as a sea of protesters marched towards Ganabhaban. Bangladesh is not the only nation where commoners stormed the leader's residence as the regime fell. This was also seen when kingdoms fell in Sri Lanka, Iraq and in Afghanistan.
advertisement

On Monday, protesters stormed Hasina's residence to assert their victory.

In a video, which has gone viral on social media, a man is seen lying on a bed at the PM's house. He is reclined on the bed and is seen talking to people. He says, "Gonobhobon is under our control".

In another video, people are seen looting television sets, chairs and tables from the PM's house. Even kitchens and refrigerators were ransacked as people feasted on fish and biryani. Also, many of them ran away with raw fish, live goats and ducks, visuals showed.

The clip of a man with a massive replica of a fish on display in the Ganabhaban campus also went viral. The massive fish replica perhaps could be that of the Hilsa, the beloved and national fish of the fish-loving nation.

Others took her saree and a Dior suitcase. Hasina was fond of sarees and had a good saree collection.

One of the worst scenes was of a ransacker posing with female lingerie retrieved from Ganabhaban.

Bangladesh is one of the countries in the last five years to see such loot. This was seen in some other places too, where the ruler had been deposed. It could be the result of people's assertion and a show of symbolic capture after a period of authoritarian rule. For most, it is a free-for-all celebration after a strong leader has been deposed.

SWIMMING IN GOTABAYA RAJAPAKSA'S PALACE IN 2022

In 2022, protestors stormed open the gates of the presidential residence after President Gotabaya Rajapaksa fled Sri Lanka amid protests.

Protestors entered the palace, which had a large dinner table, a lounge filled with sofas and a private swimming pool, according to NPR. A video also showed a man on a bed at the President's palace with a Presidential flag, reported BBC.

Clips of men jumping on the Presidential bed also went viral.

Next was, protestors taking a dip in the pool. They also entered the bedroom and the office. People also rummaged through the President's personal belongings.

In Sri Lanka, one of the most shared pictures on social media is of the three boys scrolling their phones. Young boys scrolling their phones is nothing out of the ordinary, except it is at the President's residence. The room had wide windows, a wooden bed with beautiful carvings and carpets around it and the boys were seen scrolling their phones on the bed.

WHEN PROTESTERS TOOK OVER PALACES IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN

In 2022, the same year people ransacked Rajapaksha's palace, protesters were seen storming the presidential palace in Baghdad, Iraq's capital, after the announcement by Iraq's influential Shia Muslim cleric Moqtada al-Sadr to quit politics.

They were also soon relaxing in the pool, reported Reuters. This took place after deadly clashes between the security forces and the angry crowd.

The unrest caused many deaths and left hundreds with injuries and was an outcome of prolonged protests for new elections and parliamentary dissolution.

In 2021, the Taliban entered Afghanistan's President's palace in Kabul. In a video, armed men were seen in the halls of the palace as they sat on the chair of President Ashraf Ghani, who had left the country, reported NBC.

They were seen taking a walk inside the palace and giving tours to Al Jazeera journalists, reported NBC.

Here, the Taliban did not storm the palace. It was a handshake with the Presidential Protection Service, which had protected it for two decades.

The government official had escorted the Taliban commander into the palace. They even took a selfie together.

However, occupying the chair and strolling around the palace aimlessly was to symbolise the capture of power.

This is how when regimes fall, the palaces become an amusement park for the common people, who are taken by the riches and the lavish lifestyle of their former rulers. Dhaka's Ganabhaban saw on Monday what was witnessed by palaces in Sri Lanka, Iraq and Afghanistan.


Photos: Thousands of Bangladeshis out on

streets to celebrate Sheikh 

Hasina’s  departure


Nation’s army chief to soon meet president, 
says an interim administration will be constituted.


BenarNews staff
2024.08.05

Protesters celebrate in the Dhaka University area following Sheikh Hasina’s resignation, Aug. 5, 2024. Md. Hasan/BenarNews


Sheikh Hasina Wazed, Bangladesh’s longest-serving prime minister, stepped down from the top post and fled the country, cutting short her fourth consecutive term in power after nearly 15 years at the helm of the South Asian nation.

Rights groups had accused the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the country’s first president, of ruling with an iron hand, silencing criticism and dissent, and using state machinery to do her bidding.

Hasina’s resignation came after at least 98 people had been killed nationwide on Sunday, following a civil disobedience campaign over the killings of at least 200 demonstrators during an earlier phase of protests last month.

Protesters set fire to the central office of Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League on Bangabandhu Avenue in the nation’s capital, Aug. 5, 2024. [Md. Hasan/BenarNews]

Bangladeshis storm and raid the official residence of the Prime Minister of Bangladesh after Sheikh Hasina resigned and left the country, Aug. 5, 2024. [Sony Ramany/BenarNews]

Some Bangladeshis form a circle to protect some items raided from the National Parliament building, Aug. 5, 2024. [Jibon Ahmed/BenarNews]

Thousands gather at the National Parliament Building after Sheikh Hasina resigned and fled the country amid mass protests, Aug. 5, 2024. [Sony Ramany/BenarNews]

Quota reform student protesters defy a government-imposed curfew and raise the Bangladesh flag in Dhaka, Aug. 5, 2024. [Md. Hasan/BenarNews]

Protesters set fire to a car along the streets of Dhaka's Asad Gate Aug. 5, 2024. [Sony Ramany/Benarnews]


Protesters raise the Bangladesh flag as they stand on the Anti-Terrorism Raju Memorial Sculpture after Sheikh Hasina Wazed resigned and fled the country, Aug. 5, 2024. [Md. Hasan/BenarNews]

 A Failed Attempt of Peace Communique Between Russia-Ukraine


By Hanan Salim
August 6, 2024

Copyright: European Union


The present Russia-Ukraine conflict has long historical roots and cold-war geopolitical interests—Ukraine’s inclination towards integration with NATO-led to strained relations with Russia. The Russian Federation considers Ukraine’s integration into the EU and NATO a direct threat to its geopolitical and national interests in the Eurasian region. Under President Putin’s leadership, Russia adopted an aggressive foreign policy towards Ukraine which resulted in the annexation of Crimea in 2014. Consequently, since 2022 Russia declared war on Ukraine to oppose its inclination towards NATO and in particular towards the US.

One of the recent events involved four employees of Russia’s Ministry of DĂ©fense being injured due to Ukraine shelling in the Donetsk region, while a Russian missile to the Southeastern part of Ukraine left seven civilians dead including three children and multiple casualties. Two years into war both nations find it hard to find common ground for peaceful negotiations and engagement. Ukraine has maintained its image internationally by centring the argument around sovereignty and territorial integrity, while Russia’s assertive policies have invited the wrath of organisations like the EU and NATO.

The 15th and 16th of June 2024 marked a new beginning for hope as sovereign states and international organisations came together in Switzerland to discuss and pave the way for peace towards the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Almost 100 countries participated in the communique, while a few states like India, Saudi Arabia and South Africa abstained from signing the document. India and Saudi Arabia, represented by their respective foreign ministers, voiced their unhappiness over the absence of Russia. On the other hand, South Africa voiced their denial of signing due to the presence of Israel in the peace communique as Israel currently has multiple human rights violation allegations in the ongoing conflict with Palestine. Similarly, three countries including Rwanda, Iraq and Jordan backed out of the Ukraine Peace Communique Treaty without further clarification. The Global South is still vigilant of Ukraine playing its victim card with the US’s support, after its continued stance in support of Israel.

Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that the conference was the first step towards peace and the document was prepared in hopes of promoting ‘territorial integrity’. Finally, almost 80 countries signed the document, which focuses on three important themes including nuclear safety, food security and prisoner’s exchange. The three problems addressed in the communiquĂ© were:

1. All applications of nuclear energy and infrastructure must be safe and considerate of the environment. The Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant and other nuclear power facilities in Ukraine must run safely in compliance with IAEA guidelines. It is unethical to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.

2. Food production and supply must continue uninterrupted to ensure global food security. In this context, access to the seaports of the Black and Azov Seas together with unrestricted, complete and secure merchant shipping is essential. It is intolerable to launch attacks on commerce ships at ports and along the route, as well as against civilian ports and their infrastructure.

3. In complete exchange, all prisoners of war must be released. All illegally held civilians from Ukraine including children must be returned together with all deported and displaced Ukrainians.

The peace communique granted Ukraine a $50 billion loan approved by the G7 and military support from NATO, which exposed the vested interests of the US towards Russia. However, Russia condemned the communique as it represents private interests and claimed it would be ready for negotiations if NATO withdrew its troops from the Russian-occupied Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. The failure of the summit has brought Ukraine to the realisation that actual peace can be gained only by furthering dialogue with Russia.

As peacekeeping efforts failed, the question of ending the war will remain unanswered. Nonetheless, the world must unite to stop this war through diplomatic conversations and negotiations to avoid such conflicts in the future. The peace communique is a right step forward in peacekeeping. There should be a joint peace declaration under international norms which defend Ukraine’s sovereignty and protect Russia’s interests. It should emphasise the value of a coordinated strategy for achieving peace and reflect a common outlook for a safe and stable future for both Ukraine and Russia.


Hanan Salim
Hanan Salim
Hanan Salim, Research Scholar, Department of International Relations, Peace and Public Policy (IRP and PP), St Joseph’s University, Bengaluru-560027, India.

US-Ukraine-Russian War: It’s About the Money


Well, “the cat is out of the bag, now.” Thanks to US Senator Lindsey Graham, everyone knows one of the more compelling reasons behind the Ukraine war with Russia. And it has little to do with Kiev’s “agency,” “democracy,” and “liberalism.” The latter are merely ‘talking points’ for public consumption – what Noam Chomsky and Ed Hermann called ‘manufactured consent’ in their 1988 seminal work on propaganda, Manufacturing Consent.

Lindsey Graham voiced out loud part of an agenda that is usually hidden from public view or the media – it isn’t talked about (admitted) openly. It’s a veritable “gold mine,” Graham confessed, and America can’t afford to lose control of it. Here’s the translation of Graham’s admission:

It’s About the Money.

Our reliably hawkish Republican Senator is well known for provocative statements. As early as 2022 (at the beginning of the Ukraine war) Graham was all in for regime change in Russia, when everyone else in the West was trying to downplay such a prospect. Moreover, he is quoted as saying at a press conference with Zylensky that “Russians are dying” in the war, while US aid was the “best money we’ve ever spent.”

But with the panache and subtlety of a train wreck the good senator created another stir recently, admitting on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” why Russia must not be allowed to prevail in Ukraine. The latter possesses $10 to $12 trillion worth of rich deposits of critical minerals.

Here are Senator Graham’s reasons justifying the necessity of Kiev (i.e. Washington) winning its fight with Moscow. First, the Kremlin’s access to these deposits would enrich Russia and allow via the Kremlin, China’s participation. Second, if Ukraine retains control over the minerals, it could be “the richest country in all of Europe” and “the best business partner we ever dreamed of.” Third, the outcome of the war in Ukraine is a “very big deal” for the US from an economic standpoint. Thus, Graham is saying that Ukraine’s war is “a war we can’t afford to lose.”

Credit Business Today for reporting early in the war the “real reason why the US is aiding Ukraine.” As it turns out, commercial, strategic and therefore hegemonic motives play a major role in the need for a Ukrainian victory. So much for all that babel about Kiev’s “right to self-determination,” “democracy,” and “freedom.”

The country’s strategic location, critical minerals and enormous acreage of rich arable soil is (from the US’s view) what gives Ukraine its value. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, no one seems to care much about the Ukrainian people – which gives Ukraine its greatest value.

Graham seems rather sanguine about Russians “dying,” but plenty of Ukrainians have and will continue to die as well. If one is in any way a student of history (especially in a political context), one must acknowledge that there is nothing surprising or unique here in Senator Graham’s admissions.

But one comment should be mentioned here – there is no doubt that the senator believes he has America’s best interest at heart. He has served his country faithfully in the military and 21 years in the Senate. That much must be said about the intentions of the good senator from South Carolina.

The senator is right; Ukraine has substantial reserves of critical minerals, and there is no doubt that these raw materials are of great significance. At the same time, the global supply of many critical minerals is complicated because they are concentrated in limited locations, which makes them objects of geopolitics. In some ways the situation correlates with the global concerns over oil since the 1970s.

The US Department of Energy has created a Critical Minerals List of which some 50 of the most strategic and in short supply are found in Ukraine. The EU (in its efforts to reduce its reliance on China) has also shown great interest in Ukraine’s critical mineral deposits. The Ukrainian Geological Survey has since 2022 worked with the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development to catalog Ukrainian deposits for the purpose of attracting Western investors. Everyone seems to be waiting for the payoff.

Despite the war continuing, Western investors have been queuing up, even from such distances as the Pacific Rim – Australia and Japan, especially. And it is the American – Ukrainian collaboration, the BGV Group, “that has the largest and most diverse stake in Ukraine’s critical minerals.”

In the past two years, the US and the UK especially have continued to undermine the opportunities and efforts of Russia and Ukraine to resume direct dialogue, creating pressure on Europe and even the world under which people must choose sides. But these initiatives are not generated spontaneously; rather, they derive from a decades long, ill-conceived American foreign policy.

Lack of historical reflection is often the main reason why many countries frequently make mistakes in major policy decisions. The West is representative of this malady, but they are not alone in this distinction (e.g. the divisive issues between China and India).

Rather than continuing to fight the Cold War (35 years after it ended), the US might want to rethink its foreign policy initiatives to better coincide with its goals. If America seeks to maintain its economic and political hegemony, it needs to no longer pursue foreign policy initiatives employing either/or logic.

Engaging a potential adversary need not be distilled into a choice of “either victory or appeasement.” To do so is to remain trapped in a WWII or Cold War mindset where the considered choices (when nuclear weapons are now involved) can no longer be either war or appeasement – the consequences for civilization are too great.

The concept of striving for cooperation among major powers rather than through divisive camp confrontation is not new to us. From this orientation the League of Nations and the United Nations were born. Yes, their implementation was flawed and regrettably conflicts remain. But the overall premise behind their creation and existence today remains sound – that of building “peace without victory.” The idea is to foster cooperation among major powers (rather than the camp confrontation we have seen before – and we have today) to deal with difficult diplomatic issues – before the missiles start flying. Not only was this idea not pursued in Ukraine, it was orchestrated otherwise for political and economic reasons. (But that’s another essay.)

Regrettably, the Biden administration and its allies have ignored the painful lessons of war in the 20th century – they have trampled on the warnings of their predecessors and put us all at risk, needlessly.

This is a capitulation of US diplomacy. But this is what happens when a great country like the United States allows decades of mediocre leadership to develop foreign policy initiatives inconsistent with what is in the best interest of itself and its people (Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Ukraine.) Unfortunately, we inherit the results of such folly: a strategically important but poorly developed and implemented foreign policy which does not accomplish its implied goal:

To foster America’s economic and political hegemony through strategic leadership not bombs and bombast.

Given the peril which comes from the destabilizing actions of geopolitical agendas in the world today, America’s continued position of leadership in it is pivotal if peace and stability are to ever have a chance to prosper. America needs a foreign policy to sustain that – today, that does not exist.

Rhetoric like that of the good senator from South Carolina is not a solution – it tends to undermine what is in America’s best interest.

Looks like the sanctions were about the money after all.

I am Director of The Fulcrum Institute, a new organization of current and former scholars in the Humanities, Foreign Affairs and Philosophy, Situated in Houston, Texas, USA. The “Institute”  focuses on the foreign policy initiatives of Europe as it relates to the economic and foreign policy initiatives of the US, UK, China and Russia. Our primary interest is in working towards an economic and political world in which more voices and fewer bombs are heard. (The website-URL will be live by late fall of 2024. The web address will be http://www.thefulcruminstitute.org.).

Truman’s A-Bomb Announcement Set ‘Hiroshima Narrative’ To This Day

Reprinted with permission from Greg Mitchell’s newsletter Oppenheimer: From Hiroshima to Hollywood.

My photo, above, on another August 6, out on a branch of the Ota River, where thousands died, seeking relief.

In the movie Oppenheimer the scientists at Los Alamos learn that their new weapon had exploded over a Japanese city when it is broadcast over a public address system.  Almost at the same time, the physicist who directed the bomb project, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and helped pick the targets, receives a phone call from Gen. Leslie R. Groves, director of the Manhattan Project, informing him that the first bomb had gone off with quite a “bang.”  These messages arrive suddenly, out of thin air, on August 6, 1945, and appear rather informal.

On the other hand, the official announcement for press and public had been carefully prepared and revised continually for several weeks.

President Truman, who had approved the attack on Japan, which doomed at least 125,000 to death, faced the task, in the immediate aftermath, of telling the American press and public two shocking and astounding developments:  the existence of a revolutionary new weapon, and that American forces had exploded this device of extraordinary destructive power over a Japanese target.

It was vital that this event be understood as a triumph of military power and at the same time consistent with American decency and concern for life. Everyone involved in preparing the presidential statement over the past weeks – including Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Gen. Leslie Groves – knew that the stakes were high, for this marked the creation of the official narrative of Hiroshima, which still holds sway today, though by a declining margin.

When this shocking news emerged that morning seventy-eight years ago, President Truman was at sea, returning from the Potsdam conference, so the announcement  took the form of a press release, a little more than a thousand words long.   Shortly before eleven o’clock in the East, an officer from the War Department arrived at the White House bearing bundles of publicity releases.  Assistant press secretary Eben Ayers shortly read the president’s announcement to about a dozen members of the Washington press corps.

The statement was so momentous, and the atmosphere so casual,  the reporters had trouble grasping it. “The thing didn’t penetrate with most of them,” Ayers later recalled. At least one reporter who rushed to call his editor found a disbeliever at the other end of the line.

And no wonder.  The first sentence set the tone:  “Sixteen hours ago an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima, an important Japanese Army base. That bomb had more power than 20,000 tons of TNT… The Japanese began the war from the air at Pearl Harbor. They have been repaid many fold… It is an atomic bomb. It is a harnessing of the basic power of the universe.”

Truman’s four-page statement had been crafted with considerable care over many weeks, although the target city had been left blank.  From its very first words, however, the official narrative was built on a lie:  Hiroshima was not an “army base” but a city of 350,000. It did contain one important military encampment and staging area, but the bomb had been aimed at the very center of a city (and also far from its industrial area). It aimed to take advantage of what those who picked the target called the special “focusing effect” provided by the hills which surrounded the city on three sides. This would allow the blast to bounce back on the city, destroying more of it, and its citizens.

More than 15,000 military personnel lost their lives in the bomb but the vast majority of the dead in Hiroshima would be women, the elderly, and children. Also: many forced laborers from Korea and at least a dozen American POWs. (When Nagasaki was A-bombed three days later it was officially described as a “naval base” yet less than 200 of the 100,000 dead were military.)

There was something else quite vital missing in Truman’s announcement: Because the president in his statement failed to mention radiation effects, which officials knew were horrendous, the imagery of just a bigger bomb would prevail in the press. Truman described the new weapon as “revolutionary” but only in regard to the destruction it could cause, failing to mention its most lethal new feature: radiation.

At the same time, no one but top American officials and generals knew that the Soviet Union was just hours from declaring war on Japan.  “Fini Japs” when that occurred – even without the atomic bomb – Truman had written two weeks earlier in his diary after meeting Stalin.

Many Americans first heard the news about the new bomb and the bombing from the radio, which broadcast the text of Truman’s statement shortly after its release. The afternoon papers quickly arrived with banner headlines: “Atom Bomb, World’s Greatest, Hits Japs!” and “Japan City Blasted by Atomic Bomb.” The Pentagon had released no pictures, so most of the newspapers relied on maps of Japan with Hiroshima circled.

One of the few early stories that did not come directly from the military was a wire service report filed by a journalist traveling with the president on the Atlantic. Approved by military censors, it depicted Truman, his voice “tense with excitement,” personally informing his shipmates about the atomic attack. “The experiment,” he announced, “has been an overwhelming success.”

Missing from this account was Truman’s exultant remark when the news of the bombing first reached the ship: “This is the greatest thing in history!”

The Truman announcement of the atomic bombing on August 6, 1945, firmly established the Hiroshima narrative – military necessity with no other options to end the war and countless American lives saved – that endures today.

How the “Hiroshima narrative” has been handed down to generations of Americans – and overwhelmingly endorsed by officials and the media, even if many historians disagree – matters greatly.  Over and over, top policymakers, commentators and writers declare, “We must never use nuclear weapons,” yet they endorse the two times the weapons have been used against major cities in a first strike. To make any exceptions, even in the distant past, means exceptions can be made in the future. Indeed, we have already made two exceptions, with more than 200,000 civilians killed.

Why does this matter now?  Few may know that the U.S. maintains its official “first-use” policy initiated in August 1945.  Any president has full authority to order a pre-emptive first-strike not in retaliation for a nuclear launch in our direction but during any conventional war or even an overheated crisis.

The line against using nuclear weapons has been drawn… in shifting sand.

My photo, girl in Hiroshima’s Peace Park, near ground zero, the memorial to the 125,000 or more dead in the distance.

Watch “Atomic Cover-up” for free on PBS.org (shorter version) or full version at Kanopy. My day-by-day “Countdown to Hiroshima” over at my Pressing Issues blog

Thanks for reading Oppenheimer and the Legacy of His Bomb ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Greg Mitchell is the author of a dozen books, including “Hiroshima in America,” and the recent award-winning The Beginning or the End: How Hollywood – and America – Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, and has directed three documentary films since 2021, including two for PBS (plus award-winning “Atomic Cover-up”). He has written widely about the atomic bomb and atomic bombings, and their aftermath, for over forty years. He writes often at Oppenheimer: From Hiroshima to Hollywood.




Nuclear weapons represent 'real and present danger': UN chief

Nuclear weapons and the threat of their use 'have once again appeared in the daily rhetoric of international relations,' says Antonio Guterres

Diyar Guldogan |06.08.2024 - 



WASHINGTON

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned Monday of the clear and present danger of nuclear weapons.

"Nuclear weapons, and the threat of their use, are not confined to history books. They have once again appeared in the daily rhetoric of international relations,” Guterres said in a message to mark the 79th anniversary of the atomic bombing of the Japanese city of Hiroshima by the US.

"They represent a real and present danger that remains with us today,” he added.

The Aug. 6, 1945 bombing of Hiroshima during World War II left an estimated 140,000 people dead by the end of the year, while an atomic bomb dropped on the city of Nagasaki three days later killed an estimated 74,000 people.

"The lessons of Hiroshima, which once guided our collective efforts towards disarmament and peace, have been pushed aside," Guterres said.

While "some are recklessly rattling the nuclear saber once more," he stressed that the UN endeavors to keep alive the lessons of 1945.

He called on the world to stand together to condemn "this unacceptable behavior" and find new solutions to bring disarmament to life.

"We will never forget the lessons of 6 August 1945. No more Hiroshimas. No more Nagasakis," he added.

 

Australian journalists strike for better pay and working conditions

Nine Publishing journalists on strike

Nine Publishing journalists ended their strike on July 31 after successfully asserting their demands for better pay, secure jobs, and newsroom diversity. Screenshot from YouTube video of withMEAA. Fair use.

Hundreds of journalists belonging to Nine Publishing in Australia ended their five-day strike and returned to work on July 31 after management agreed to offer a better deal to its employees.

The strike started on July 26 with staff members from The Sydney Morning HeraldThe AgeThe Australian Financial ReviewBrisbane Times, and WAtoday holding rallies outside their offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane and Perth. These newspapers are part of the Nine company.

Union representatives and Nine Entertainment management have been in negotiation for months to reach a day deal. One of the main asking points was raises that were “slightly higher than inflation” — especially as staffers agreed to a wage freeze during the pandemic — as well as transparent pay rates for freelancers.

The employees decided to take industrial action through their union in response to the “inadequate offer” from management. During the negotiations, management also announced that around 90 jobs would be reduced due to financial constraints. The union reminded the company that “there is no financial bottom line without a strong journalistic frontline.”

The strikers called for “fairer pay, secure jobs, newsroom diversity, protections around Artificial Intelligence (AI), better rights for freelancers, and to protect journalism.” The management expressed “profound disappointment” since the strike coincided with the Paris 2024 Olympics coverage, and it urged the union to continue with the renegotiation.

After five days of protesting and clinching support from various stakeholders, the strike ended with the management agreeing to a “pay rise above inflation, ethical use of AI, a commitment to report on diversity in the workplace, and an agreement to negotiate for a fair deal for freelancers.”

Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA Media) acting director Michelle Rae praised the union members for their unwavering commitment to assert their rights.

Our members should be very proud that their solidarity with each other and their commitment to their role of public interest journalism has produced this outcome.

They took a stand to protect quality journalism at their mastheads and it’s clear from the massive public support for the journalists while they were on strike that readers want access to quality journalism and the boards of media companies need to find a new business model.

During the strike, the Guardian Australia House Committee expressed solidarity with Nine journalists:

Journalists have worked hard through a global pandemic and a cost of living crisis, in an industry that is increasingly volatile. It is irresponsible and disrespectful to punish the very people that the company relies on for its success in pursuit of shareholder profits.

Newsroom staff of The Sydney Morning Herald walked out of their office at the start of the strike:

This cartoon depicts the support given by fellow journalists to the striking employees of Nine:

The union was simultaneously working to advance protections for freelancers writers. They also joined the picket line to demand better pay:

Journalists on strike used the X (Twitter) hashtag #DontTorchJournalism to share information and get support on social media.

Tito Ambyo, co-vice-president of the Melbourne Press Club, addressed the criticism that the strike affected news coverage of the ongoing Olympics in Paris. He wrote on Crikey:

What’s more important: two weeks of sports coverage or the future of a profession dedicated to informing the public and holding power to account?

It’s crucial to remember that journalists have no moral obligation to prioritise their audience over their working conditions. They have the right to protest, and protests are meant to be disruptive.

MEAA celebrated the successful strike by affirming that the campaign for meaningful journalism will continue.

The strike and ensuing negotiations reflected a larger problem in many countries’ media ecosystems where there is tension between making newsrooms profitable and ensuring journalists have fair wages and protections.