Thursday, August 15, 2024

HRW: International Olympic Committee right to stand against “sex testing”


Human Rights Watch
13 August 2024




Boxer Imane Khelif of Team Algeria celebrates as she wins the gold medal at the Olympic Games, in Paris, France, 9 August 2024. Aytac Unal/Anadolu via Getty Images

"Sex testing has often relied on racist gender stereotypes. There is no scientific consensus that higher than typical endogenous testosterone in women confers an athletic advantage. There have never been sex tests for men, meaning sex testing is intrinsically discriminatory against women" - HRW

This statement was originally published on hrw.org on 8 August 2024.

Vitriol directed at boxers Is a product of discriminatory policies

An outpouring of vitriol against two women in the Paris Olympics boxing competition shows the immense harms “sex testing” policies cause and how important the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) framework for inclusion is to women’s rights.

Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting and Algeria’s Imane Khelif were thrust into the spotlight last week thanks to the specter of sex testing regulations hanging over sport and the bigotry of some prominent individuals on the internet. The social media pile on, including by Elon Musk and J.K. Rowling, undermined the women’s privacy, dignity, and safety. Rumors and media leaks about women athletes’ anatomy have historically ruined lives, leading women to quit sport and in some cases seek asylum to ensure their safety.

The IOC has called out bigotry and disinformation. “I would ask everybody to respect these women, to respect them as women and as human beings. When you speak about human rights then you have the human right of every woman to participate in a women’s competition,” IOC President Thomas Bach told a press conference last week in Paris. IOC spokesperson Mark Adams said: “I need hardly say if we start acting on suspicions against every athlete of whatever, then we go down a very bad route.”

For decades, sport governing bodies have regulated women’s participation through “sex testing” regulations targeting women athletes who, often through variations in their sex characteristics, have higher than typical natural testosterone. Sex testing has often relied on racist gender stereotypes. There is no scientific consensus that higher than typical endogenous testosterone in women confers an athletic advantage. Besides, there have never been sex tests for men, meaning sex testing is intrinsically discriminatory against women. The vague language of sex testing regulations, the exclusive control over their implementation by sport governing bodies, and the arbitrary application of unscientific methods, trigger surveillance of women.

But there is also a history of athletes pushing back. In 2014, the Athletics Federation of India outed one of its women runners, Dutee Chand, for having high testosterone and banned her from competition. Chand took her case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport and was reinstated, and the global sex testing regulations for women runners were temporarily scrapped. Caster Semenya, the South African runner ruled ineligible for competition, successfully challenged the sex testing regulations at the European Court of Human Rights and awaits the outcome of an appeal against her victory.

Women’s equality in sport is an ongoing project, and movements for pay equity and accountability for sexual abuse are gaining momentum. Attempting to exclude women based on sexist and racist stereotypes only detracts from the bigger goal.

What to know about Olympic boxer Imane Khelif’s cyberbullying complaint

WASHINGTON POST

French investigators are looking into charges including gender-based cyber harassment and public insult after the gold medalist was targeted in online attacks.

Gold medal-winning Olympic boxer Imane Khelif has filed a legal complaint in France for alleged cyber harassment.

The Paris prosecutor’s office confirmed in an email Wednesday that it received the case that Khelif filed with its special unit for combating online hate speech. Investigators are looking into charges including gender-based cyber harassment and public insult.

This comes after a flurry of online attacks spreading false claims about her gender. Former president Donald Trump, author J.K. Rowling and billionaire Elon Musk were among those who referred to Khelif as a man or reposted such claims.

Imane Khelif and the gender controversy

Khelif is an Algerian boxer who won gold in the women’s 66-kilogram (146-pound) division at the Paris Olympics. During the Games, Khelif faced false claims online that she was a man or transgender.

The International Olympic Committee stood by Khelif as a Russian boxing chief, Umar Kremlev, repeatedly alleged without proof that a test revealed the Algerian boxer had XY chromosomes.

Khelif “was born female, was registered female, lived her life as a female, boxed as a female, has a female passport,” IOC spokesman Mark Adams said in a news conference Aug. 2. “This is not a transgender case.”

Kremlev heads the International Boxing Association. The IOC cut ties with the IBA last year over Kremlev’s connections to Russian President Vladimir Putin and other scandals. The IOC accused the IBA of running a Russian-backed “disinformation campaign against the Olympic movement.”

As female boxer Imane Khelif prepares for competition, International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach stands by female boxers. (Video: The Washington Post)

Still, online vitriol grew as she advanced through the competition.


Rowling, Musk and Trump were among those who shared posts suggesting Khelif was not a woman after Italian boxer Angela Carini abruptly quit her round-of-16 fight against Khelif after being punched in the face.

In the news conference, Adams said he’d seen a lot of “damaging” misinformation on social media around the boxing case, and encouraged people to put themselves in the shoes of the athletes involved.

The complaint

A complaint for aggravated cyber harassment was filed with the Paris prosecutor’s office, Khelif’s attorney, Nabil Boudi, said in a statement Aug. 10 on X, adding that the boxer was subjected to a “misogynistic, racist and sexist campaign.”

“The unjust harassment suffered by the boxing champion will remain the biggest stain of these Olympic Games,” Boudi said.

Government investigators will look into the allegations and decide whether to submit cyberbullying charges. Under French law, such convictions can result in prison terms or fines.

Who was named in the complaint?



The complaint did not name the perpetrators, which is common under French law, according to the Associated Press, and gives prosecutors room to investigate anyone who could be culpable.

What has happened in other cases?

France has been working to combat cyberbullying and to reduce the dominance of U.S. tech companies. Other French cases of aggravated online harassment have resulted in prosecutions.

Almost 30 people were sentenced this year after a judge found them guilty of the online harassment of a French influencer, French network BFM TV reported, in one of the country’s largest cyberbullying cases to date. Lawyers representing the woman said in a news release that the severity of the sentences — up to 18 months in prison — was “unprecedented in a case of cyberbullying,” according to BFM TV.

Anti-bullying laws made harassment an offense in schools and universities in 2022, punishable with sentences of up to 10 years, and strengthened the obligations of tech companies to moderate school bullying on social media.

What Khelif said


Responding to the gender controversy, Khelif said: “I am a woman. I was born a woman and was raised a woman, and I compete as a woman.”

After beating China’s Liu Yang to claim the gold medal in the welterweight division, Khelif said, “My honor is intact now.”

“My message to the world — the whole world — is: Hold on to Olympic values and not bully people,” she said.

Les Carpenter contributed to this report.


By Rachel PannettRachel Pannett joined the Post's foreign desk in 2021 after more than a decade with The Wall Street Journal, where she was deputy bureau chief for Australia and New Zealand. Twitter

By Victoria BissetVictoria Bisset is a breaking-news reporter for The Washington Post's London Hub, covering the most urgent and consequential stories as they unfold on the European day.



Taiwanese boxer Lin Yu-ting says she blocked out gender dispute en route to Olympic gold

Gold medallist Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting celebrating on the podium during the medal ceremony for the women's 57kg final boxing category on Aug 10. 

Aug 11, 2024

PARIS – Lin Yu-ting, one of two boxers at the centre of a gender dispute at the Paris Olympics, said staying off social media and focusing on her sport had helped her cope with nearly two weeks of international headlines over her eligibility for the Games.

Lin, who beat Polish opponent Julia Szeremeta to claim the women’s featherweight (57kg) gold on Aug 10, and Algerian Imane Khelif, were both caught up in a storm that has dominated headlines and been the subject of heated debate on social media platforms.

The two boxers were disqualified from the 2023 world championships by the International Boxing Association (IBA), which said a sex chromosome test had ruled both of them ineligible.


They competed in Paris after the International Olympic Committee (IOC) stripped the IBA of its status as the sport’s governing body in 2023 and took control of organising the boxing competition itself.

The IOC used boxing eligibility rules that were applied at the 2016 and 2020 Olympics and do not include gender testing.

“As an elite athlete during the competition, it’s important to shut myself off from social media and to focus. That is extremely important,” Lin said after her win.


“Of course, I heard some of the information through my coach, but I didn’t pay too much attention to it. I was invited by the IOC to participate at the Games, this is what I focused on.

“As for the other news, I relied on my coach to answer the questions. I just focused on who my competitor would be, I focused on training and being able to bring my A-game when I fought.”

On Aug 10, Khelif’s lawyer Nabil Boudi said the Algerian boxer had filed a formal legal complaint citing online harassment.

Asked if she would take similar measures, Chinese Taipei’s Lin said: “This is something I will discuss with my team. We will decide later what the next step will be.”


Lin, a two-time world champion, was overcome by emotion after the bout and moved to tears while standing on the podium.

“During the fight, I saw images flashing and I thought about the beginning of my career when I started boxing,” the 28-year-old said.

“All the difficult practice sessions, the times I got injured, the competitors I fought against.

“There were times of great pain and times of great joy. I cried because I was so touched.

“I represented Taiwan, I got the gold medal. I want to thank all the people in Taiwan who supported me, from the beginning to the end.”

More On This Topic
Olympic gold has ‘special taste’ for boxer Imane Khelif after gender dispute
Chinese Taipei boxer Lin Yu-ting in Olympics gender row into final after ‘tough journey’



Meanwhile, Uzbekistan’s boxing dominance was completed on Aug 10 as Bakhodir Jalolov and Abdumalik Khalokov won gold to further improve the country’s best-ever performance at the Olympics.

Khalokov and Jalolov added to compatriots Hasanboy Dusmatov, Asadkhuja Muydinkhujaev and Lazizbek Mullojonov’s wins, meaning Uzbek boxers have won gold in five out of the seven men’s categories in Paris.

Uzbekistan have won a total of eight gold medals across all sports in Paris, doubling their previous record haul of four in Rio.

Khalokov began the day by beating Kyrgyzstan’s Munarbek Seitbek Uulu by unanimous decision in the men’s featherweight (57kg) final. Australian Charlie Senior and Bulgaria’s Javier Ibanez took bronze after their semi-final defeats.

In the closing bout, defending Olympic, Asian Games and world champion Jalolov encountered little resistance from Spain’s Ayoub Ghadfa in the super heavyweight (over 92kg) final.

The towering Uzbek did well to keep out of his shorter opponent’s range and pick off shots whenever an opening presented itself to win by unanimous decision.

“This is history for Uzbekistan, and I’m emotional because becoming a two-time Olympic champion was my dream,” he said.

“Now, I feel very happy, and I will continue as a professional boxer.”

Uzbekistan’s success in the men’s field has been mirrored by China in the women’s tournament, with Li Qian beating Panama’s Atheyna Bylon in the middleweight (75kg) final to become the third Chinese woman boxer to win gold in Paris.

Before the Games, China had failed to win boxing gold in three editions since women were first permitted to box at the 2012 Olympics. 

REUTERS


Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting wins women’s featherweight boxing gold amid gender dispute


Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan celebrates winning against Poland's Julia Szeremeta in the women's featherweight final on Aug 10. 

Aug 11, 2024

PARIS - Lin Yu-ting, one of two boxers at the heart of a gender dispute at the Paris Games, made light work of Polish opponent Julia Szeremeta to claim the women's featherweight title on Aug 10.

Lin and Algeria's Imane Khelif, who won gold in the welterweight category on Friday, have been in the spotlight as part of a gender dispute that has dominated headlines and been the subject of much discussion on social media platforms, triggering a legal complaint from the Algerian.

The 28-year-old Lin became Taiwan's first gold medallist in boxing, with the island having previously won only three bronze medals in the sport - two of which came at the Paris Olympics.

"I find it truly incredible," Lin told reporters. "I want to thank everyone who supported and believed in me; it’s what has kept me going until now. I've also written history for Taiwan to let the world know about it.

"Every match is challenging. Even though it might look like a 5-0 win, each match is a big test of whether my training foundation is solid.

"I think the fact that she could participate in the Olympics already is a testament to her skills," Lin, who carried her coach on her way to the medical check after the bout, told a press conference.

GENDER TEST


Lin and Khelif were disqualified by the International Boxing Association (IBA) from the 2023 World Championships in New Delhi, with the body saying in a shambolic press conference at the Paris Games that a gender test had ruled them ineligible.

The two boxers are competing at the Olympics after the International Olympic Committee (IOC) stripped the IBA of its status as the sport's governing body in 2023 and took control of organising the boxing in Paris.

The IOC has rejected the results of the IBA-ordered tests as arbitrary and illegitimate, saying there was no reason to conduct them.

At these Games, the IOC is using boxing eligibility rules that were applied at the 2016 and 2021 Olympics which do not include gender testing.

Taiwan President Lai Ching-te praised Lin.

"In the face of malicious and untrue disinformation, Taiwanese, whether they are the government or the people, regardless of political party, are united and refuse to let Yu-Ting be the target of false information attacks," he wrote on Facebook.

"Yu-Ting, you are amazing!. The distractions outside the ring will not affect your solid performance. You have shown more strength than other boxers of the same weight, and you have also won the support of boxers from all over the world who have fought against you."

Using her jab to keep Szeremeta at bay, Lin landed a couple of right hooks as the Pole was looking to break the distance.

Szeremeta was full of good intentions but lacked speed and accuracy, exposing herself to counter punches.

Nesthy Petecio of the Philippines and Turkey's Esra Yildiz were awarded bronze.

 REUTERS
Hosting of UN climate summits by authoritarian countries raises alarms over human rights

International|Freedom of Assembly

Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR)

14 August 2024




Baku, Azerbaijan, 2 June 2024. A portrait of former president Heydar Aliyev is displayed on a street, as the government has been working on restoring the facades of certain buildings in preparation for receiving visitors to the COP29 climate summit. Fadel Dawod/Getty Images

Rights groups urge the UN to ensure that future climate summits are held in countries that respect human rights and allow for peaceful assembly and free speech.

This statement was originally published on gc4hr.org on 13 August 2024.

Open letter to the secretariat for the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bonn, Germany

13 August 2024

Re: Call to stop hosting Conference of Parties (COP) annual climate summits in authoritarian countries

We write as a global coalition of non-governmental organisations to protest the continuous awarding of repressive governments with hosting privileges of United Nations conferences. For example, Azerbaijan was awarded hosting privileges of the UN Conference of Parties (COP) climate change summit in November 2024, which has resulted in the use of the government’s state security apparatus to suppress and close civic space in the country. Such crackdowns on civil society have undoubtedly undermined campaigns tailored towards the promotion and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms in regions or countries where UN conferences are held.

From Egypt during COP27 to the UAE during COP28, civic space has shrunk in countries where the COP is held, particularly those which are oil-producing autocratic countries. Similarly, the hosting of the COP29 in Baku has already resulted in hundreds of arrests of human rights activists and journalists in Azerbaijan. The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) secretariat must ensure that all COP hosts comply with international human rights law and do not use the COP as a pretext to censor and crack down civil society activism and advocacy.

Article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) provides that “The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognised,” which is considered a fundamental human right. This right includes a corresponding obligation on States to respect and ensure its exercise without discrimination, requiring states to refrain from unwarranted interference and to protect the participants. Azerbaijan ratified the ICCPR and the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Subsidiary Body on Implementation highlights the need of the UNFCCC sessions and mandated events to be convened in places where human rights and fundamental freedoms are promoted and protected, and where all participants are effectively protected against any violations or abuses. Therefore, the human rights record in Azerbaijan raises significant concerns amongst both local and international civil society.

Given the fact that for several years, Azerbaijani journalists and CSOs have already been facing severe restrictions, such as stringent requirements for media registration, and restrictions on foreign funding for NGOs, the rights to freedom of expression and association have been majorly hindered. The dynamics of intensified repressive measures, combined with physical and economic threats, make it nearly impossible for media and CSOs to conduct their work independently and without fear of persecution.

Yet, upon gaining the COP Presidency Status, the government of Azerbaijan has launched an unprecedented crackdown on independent media and civil society activists in the country. As of July 2024, the list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan amounts to at least 306 individuals.

The most recent arrests of former Azerbaijani diplomat Emin Ibrahimov and a young Talysh scientist-ethnographer, Iqbal Abilov, who was arrested on 22 July 2024, have raised significant international concern regarding the human rights situation in Azerbaijan prior to COP29.

Moreover, the Azerbaijani government uses overly restrictive measures for its detainees: the life and health of Famil Khalilov, a disabled human rights activist and blogger, is at stake, while he is in detention on bogus charges of drug smuggling. Another alarming case is of economist Fasil Gasimov, who has began a hunger strike on 14 June 2024, severely damaging his health to protest against unjustified criminal prosecution and torture.

According to Amnesty International, on 29 April 2024, prominent human rights defender Anar Mammadli, Head of the Election Monitoring and Democracy Studies Centre and co-founder of the Climate of Justice Initiative in Azerbaijan, was arrested.

Previous hosts in the past two years have also not respected human rights. In December 2023, while hosting the COP28 in Dubai, Emirati authorities brought charges against at least 84 defendants in retaliation for forming an independent advocacy group in 2010, many of whom had already been serving prison sentences for the same or similar offenses. The unfair mass trial of the “UAE84” was marred by serious due process and fair trial violations, including restricted access to case material and information, limited legal assistance, judges directing witness testimony, violations of the principle of double jeopardy, credible allegations of serious abuse and ill-treatment, and hearings shrouded in secrecy. On 10 July, the court convicted at least 44 defendants in the mass trial and meted out sentences ranging from between 15 years to life in prison in the UAE’s second largest unfair mass trial.

The previous year in Sharm-el-Sheikh, Egypt, NGOs and UN Experts complained that climate activists and members of civil society “were subjected to intimidation, harassment and surveillance during the COP27” in November 2022.

Climate change activists have complained that thousands of lobbyists for oil companies have attended the COPs in recent years, while activists have been very limited in their ability to protest. The UN can only guarantee the right to protest inside the venue of COPs, and not outside, which led to extremely limited protests related to climate change and human rights in both Egypt and UAE, where protests are illegal. Human Rights Watch reported that in the UAE “Advocacy actions and protests within the UN-run “blue zone” were also severely limited, with unprecedented restrictions on freedom of speech from the UNFCCC Secretariat.” For example, an action with photos of imprisoned Emirati human rights defenders was delayed repeatedly, and only allowed to take place with severe restrictions.

We call on the UNFCCC to make the host agreements for future COPs public and ensure they comply with international human rights law, including by protecting the rights to freedom of speech and assembly.

Signatories
Femena
Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR)
Human Rights Club, Azerbaijan
Institute for Human Rights
Institute for Reporters’ Freedom and Safety, Azerbaijan
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
Migrant Workers’ Voice
World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders

Gaza war one of bloodiest in 21st century: Report

Compared to percentage of population killed, Gaza is among the top 5 most violent conflicts of 21st century, professor tells Israel's Haaretz daily

 15/08/2024 Thursday
AA
In a recent investigation, Israel's Haaretz daily highlighted the 
ongoing Israeli war on Gaza as one of the “bloodiest” wars of the 21st century.

According to the newspaper, the war has claimed the lives of tens of thousands of Palestinians, many of whom were in zones previously designated as “safe” by the Israeli military.

The report criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for accusing “the international community of hypocrisy concerning the war in the Gaza Strip – and to claim it is ignoring other conflicts and humanitarian disasters.”

For example, Netanyahu in January said: “Where was South Africa when millions were killed or expelled from their homes in Syria and Yemen?”

“But a cold examination of the numbers killed in the Gaza Strip reveals this is one of the bloodiest wars since the beginning of the century, especially if you examine the rate of mortality out of the total population,” the report added.

Haaretz pointed out that the Gaza war has resulted in an extraordinarily high death toll, with approximately 40,000 Palestinians killed since the onslaught began on Oct. 7 last year -- equating to around 2% of Gaza's population of two million.

-Targeting safe areas

Despite the Israeli army's designation of certain areas in Gaza as “safe areas,” the daily said that “most of the residents of Gaza have been displaced, but their escape to areas the Israel Defense Forces (army) has designated as safe zones has not always helped, and many have been killed in these areas too.”

The Israeli forces have repeatedly targeted “safe areas” where displaced civilians gathered, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of people, including women and children.

The report noted that international organizations and media outlets have consistently verified the casualty figures provided by Gaza's Ministry of Health.

As of Wednesday, the ministry reported nearly 40,000 Palestinian deaths and over 92,000 injuries due to the ongoing war, with more than 10,000 people still missing under the rubble.

Haaretz compared the Gaza conflict to other major humanitarian disasters.

“In the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar, for example, about 25,000 people have been killed, according to the United Nations.

“The war in Gaza also stands out in comparison to wars from the 1990s, for example those that took place in the former state of Yugoslavia. One of these regions was Bosnia, and in the worst year of the conflict, 1991, the average number of deaths per month was 2,097 – and the total number killed over four years there was 63,000,” it added.

- 4,000 fatalities per month

The newspaper highlighted the alarming death rate in Gaza, which averages around 4,000 fatalities per month, far surpassing the monthly death toll in Ukraine's ongoing conflict.

One of the most striking aspects of the Gaza war, according to Haaretz, is the lack of safe refuge for civilians. The densely populated, 360-square-kilometer (139-square-mile) area offers little to no escape for non-combatants, further exacerbating the humanitarian crisis.

“The difference that stands out the most between the rest of the wars of the 21st century and the war in the Gaza Strip is the size of the territory where the fighting is taking place, and the inability of the uninvolved civilians to flee the battles – and in particular the percentage of casualties among the overall population,” the newspaper elaborated.​​​​​​​

Living conditions for displaced civilians in so-called “humanitarian” zones are dire, with overcrowding, disease and a lack of shelter and medical supplies. Haaretz emphasized the staggering impact of the war, noting that 2% of Gaza's population has been killed in less than a year—a level of destruction rarely seen outside of Africa since World War II.

Michael Spagat, a professor at the University of London who specializes in monitoring conflict casualties, told Haaretz that “in terms of the total number of dead, I assume Gaza won't be among the 10 most violent conflicts of the 21st century.”

"But compared to the percentage of the population killed," Spagat assumes it is already “among the top five.”

The devastation in Gaza has led to widespread starvation and malnutrition, particularly among children. As of Wednesday, 115 infants had died since the start of the war, according to Gaza's Ministry of Health. The ministry also reported that 37 Palestinians, including children, have succumbed to hunger and malnutrition during the conflict.

Adding to the grim toll, Gaza's Civil Defense announced the deaths of two more rescue workers in Rafah on Wednesday, bringing the total number of first responders killed since Oct. 7 to 82.

Israel, flouting a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate cease-fire, has faced international condemnation amid its continued brutal offensive on Gaza since an Oct. 7 attack last year by the Palestinian resistance group Hamas.

Nearly 40,000 Palestinians have since been killed in Gaza, most of them women and children, and over 92,000 others injured, according to local health authorities.

More than 10 months into the Israeli war, vast tracts of Gaza lie in ruins amid a crippling blockade of food, clean water and medicine.

The International Court of Justice has accused Israel of genocide and ordered a halt to its military operations in the southern city of Rafah, where over a million Palestinians had sought refuge before the city was invaded on May 6.

Israel’s endgame in Gaza, an impossible mission

by Dr Daud Abdullah
August 15, 2024 

A person holds a placard that reads ‘The Nakba never ended’ in London during the ‘National March for Gaza’ on August 3, 2024 [CARLOS JASSO/AFP via Getty Images]

Throughout the war on Gaza the weapon of disinformation has been used with lethal effect. From the beginning, Israel’s Western allies led the assault on global public opinion. Untruths about the beheading of babies and rape of Israeli women were repeated and overblown without verification. Other fabrications that continue to gain currency include the claim that Israel does not have an endgame in Gaza. Of course it does.

For Israel’s right-wing government, the ideal endgame is a second Nakba. That requires the depopulation of every town and village in Gaza, and the forced expulsion of survivors to the Egyptian Sinai. Eighty-four per cent of Gaza’s territory is now under evacuation orders.

Calls for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza started long before ‘Operation Al-Aqsa Flood’. In October 2021, Minister of Finance, Bezalel Smotrich, told Arab parliamentarians: “I am not holding any conversations with you, you anti-Zionists…You are [here] due to a mistake because [Israel’s first Prime Minister David] Ben-Gurion didn’t finish the job and throw you out in 1948.”

More recently, in November 2023, Avi Dichter, the incumbent security cabinet member and agriculture minister, announced: “We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba.”

“Gaza Nakba 2023. That’s how it’ll end,” he stressed.




Everything that has taken place in Gaza since October 2023 confirms that there is indeed a plan. It is to make Gaza unlivable so that its inhabitants would simply pack up and leave. Already, a total of 1.9 million people, or nine in every ten in Gaza have been displaced.

WATCH: Nakba survivor: ‘The current war on Gaza is crueller than the Nakba’

Even so, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s army remains demoralised and substantially weakened. Senior army officers and officials in the intelligence community have been openly criticising the prime minister, saying that the war is unwinnable. Army spokesman Daniel Hagari caused uproar when he told Israel’s Channel 13 in June that “Hamas is an idea, Hamas is a party. It’s rooted in the hearts of the people — anyone who thinks we can eliminate Hamas is wrong.” He added: “To say that we are going to make Hamas disappear is to throw sand in people’s eyes.”

Similarly, former Mossad deputy chief Ram Ben-Barak lamented the fact that Israel is losing the war in Gaza. “This war lacks a clear objective, and it’s evident that we’re unequivocally losing it,” Ben-Barak told Israeli public radio. “We are forced to engage in fighting in the same areas and end up losing more soldiers,” he said.

Faced with this reality of mounting losses of men and equipment, and the refusal of hundreds of reservists to fight in Gaza, the Israeli government has resorted to the supreme court to order the conscription of ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students into the army. They were previously exempt from military service. Whereas some 1,000 were expected to register on 5 August, only 30 actually turned up.




76 years on, Palestinians are still living the Nakba – Cartoon [Sabaaneh/MiddleEastMonitor]Like a desperate and compulsive gambler making the last throw of his dice, Netanyahu has therefore decided to intensify the bombing of Palestinian shelters across Gaza, claiming that a similar campaign was conducted by the Allies during World War Two. According to his twisted logic, the Israeli prime minister reckoned that by killing more civilians this would pressure Hamas to surrender or even force the civilians to rise up against the resistance. What he has failed to acknowledge is that after the destruction of 58 German cities, neither did Hitler capitulate or did the German people rise up against him. Likewise, although the German Blitz of London and other British cities in 1940-41 killed an estimated 40,000 people, that did not force the British people to rise up against Churchill.


As it stands, there is nothing to suggest that Gaza’s civilian population is about to seek refuge in Egypt or rise up against the Hamas-led resistance. Israel’s ruling elite have clearly not learnt the lessons from their 1982 invasion of Lebanon. At the time, their objective was to eradicate fighters from the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) in the country. In the end, they were drawn into a war of attrition that lasted two decades until they were booted out in 2000. All that was achieved is that they created the conditions for a resistance movement, Hezbollah, to emerge with a military capability that none of the Palestinian forces possessed then or now.

Having learnt the hard way from their 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, the Biden administration has tried in vain to deter Netanyahu from a protracted war in Gaza. For the US, what started as an operation to defeat Al-Qaeda eventually turned into an operation of regime change and then state building. Eventually, it spent two decades fighting in Afghanistan and achieved none of its objectives.

Israel’s current war in Gaza bears distinct similarities to its misadventure in Lebanon and the American fiasco in Afghanistan. Gaza has evidently become the quagmire that was predicted. The ‘absolute’ defeat of Hamas that was promised ten months ago is proving to be more distant and difficult than envisaged. Worse still, the preferred option of expulsion and reoccupation also seems unattainable. With or without an endgame, Israel faces a mission impossible in Gaza.


China’s Railway Diplomacy on High Speed in Vietnam

2024/08/15•World

UCG/Universal Images Group via G

East Asia Forum


East Asia Forum is a platform for analysis and research on politics, economics, business, law, security, international relations and society relevant to public policy, centred on the Asia Pacific region. It consists of an online publication and a quarterly magazine, East Asia Forum Quarterly, which aim to provide clear and original analysis from the leading minds in the region and beyond.
Follow
What you need to know

Vietnam plans to construct two high-speed rail (HSR) lines in collaboration with China by 2030. The routes aim to enhance transport connectivity with China, boosting economic ties, trade, and investment.

By Dragan Pavlicevic

The Vietnamese government announced in April 2024 that it aims to start construction of two high-speed railway (HSR) lines in cooperation with China by 2030. One of the proposed routes will link Haiphong, a key port in the north of the country, with Lao Cai province bordering China’s Yunnan province, via the capital Hanoi. Another will connect Hanoi to Lang Son province, neighboring China’s Guangxi province.


Traversing some of Vietnam’s key manufacturing hubs and FDI destinations, these lines should eventually become part of an expanded cross-country railway network, as envisioned by long-shelved but recently revived plans to modernize Vietnam’s rail system.

The two proposed railway routes will be important assets for Vietnam’s economy. Improved transport connectivity with China will deepen economic ties, particularly in tourism, trade and investment. Establishing passenger-dedicated lines will free up capacity on the existing cargo railways, which will be crucial as trade volume continues to grow and as manufacturing relocates to Vietnam from China due to rising production costs and geopolitical uncertainties.

The new HSR lines will link up with the recently built lines extending China’s railway network to the Vietnamese border, facilitating imports of Chinese industrial goods and materials. When integrated into the broader transport network across Southeast Asia, Vietnam hopes to benefit from better connectivity with regional markets and further establish itself as an industrial hub and investment destination.

Planners also seem to intend to leverage the project for industrial upgrading and broader development, mimicking China’s experience. China used HSR to acquire new technology and capabilities in the railway sector and as a springboard for a broader developmental agenda, creating new pockets of economic activity around the HSR lines.


There are also important symbolic aspects to capital developmental projects. The ability to deliver economic growth has been fundamental to the legitimacy of one-party rule in Vietnam. The HSR project, which symbolises modernity and development, will play into narratives of competent and effective governance. Understanding itself as a regional leader, modernising the national railway system is also a matter of status positioning for Vietnam, both domestically and internationally.

But there are caveats to Vietnam’s HSR project. High-speed railway projects often fall behind their original deadlines and run over projected costs, raising questions about their cost–benefit ratio and financial sustainability. If the project faces delays, cost overruns or burdensome debt, it may not achieve its goals and will likely adversely affect the credibility of the Vietnamese government. Establishing terms that minimise these risks could prove crucial for defining the project’s long-term impact.

Vietnam must also carefully navigate the geopolitical and geoeconomic context. Hanoi’s relationship with China is burdened by territorial disputes in the South China Sea and Vietnam’s increasing closeness with the United States and Japan in defence and strategic relations. Making Beijing a stakeholder in a capital developmental project which aims to bring economic and strategic gains to both sides will help counterbalance security and strategic tensions and manage related risks. This exemplifies Vietnam’s policy of ‘cooperation and struggle’ towards great powers as it aims to strike a delicate balance between the United States and China while maintaining its autonomy.

It is currently unclear whether the larger north–south HSR route project will also be financed and constructed by China, since Hanoi has previously entered discussions with Japan. While the Vietnamese government could be seeking to balance relations with China and Japan by getting them both involved in this strategically important and economically lucrative railway project, Hanoi could also be instrumentalising this competition for its own benefit. As was demonstrated in the case of Indonesian HSR, bringing the two to compete for the project may result in more favourable terms of engagement when it comes to the price tag, financing conditions and structure of the project.


Sino–Vietnamese HSR cooperation also reveals dynamics related to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), in which exports of infrastructure have played a central role. Despite criticisms over the BRI’s financial burdens and political externalities, Chinese efforts to deepen ties with Southeast Asia through the development of modern regional railway networks have recently found new momentum. The completion and reportedly solid performance of China-built railways in Indonesia and Laos seem to have prompted Vietnam to reassess and expedite plans for developing railway infrastructure after years of ambivalence.

This suggests that both the BRI and HSR projects remain important mechanisms for building foreign relations. Beijing’s reformulation and scaling down of the BRI with the slogan ‘small is beautiful’ may have misled some observers to believe that the era of large-scale financing and construction of capital infrastructure projects, characteristic of the BRI during the 2010s, is over.

Yet the BRI remains shaped by pragmatic considerations. As long as the infrastructure gap continues to constrain Southeast Asian countries’ development and demand for infrastructure development persists, China will seek to leverage its experience and resources to deepen connectivity and integration with and across the region.

Dragan Pavlićević is Associate Professor at Xi’an Jiaotong–Liverpool University, China.
WAIT, WHAT?!

Disney seeks to dismiss wrongful death lawsuit because widower signed up to Disney+ trial

By Philip Marcelo
Updated August 15, 2024 —

New York: Does signing up for Disney’s popular streaming service mean you have agreed to never sue the entertainment giant over anything forever?

That is what Disney argues in a wrongful death lawsuit involving a 42-year-old New York doctor whose family claims had a fatal allergic reaction after eating at an Irish pub in Disney Springs in October.



Jeffrey Piccolo has claimed his wife Kanokporn Tangsguan’s death was due to an allergic reaction to a dish at a Disney theme park.CREDIT:FACEBOOK

Disney is asking a Florida court to dismiss a lawsuit brought against it by Jeffrey Piccolo, the husband of Kanokporn Tangsuan, a family medicine specialist with NYU Langone’s office in Carle Place, on Long Island.

The company argues Piccolo had agreed to settle any lawsuits against Disney out of court through the arbitration process when he signed up for a one-month trial of Disney+ in 2019 and acknowledged that he had reviewed the fine print.

“The Terms of Use, which were provided with the Subscriber Agreement, include a binding arbitration clause,” the company wrote in its motion. “The first page of the Subscriber Agreement states, in all capital letters, that ‘any dispute between You and Us, Except for Small Claims, is subject to a class action waiver and must be resolved by individual binding arbitration’.”

Disney also notes in its response that Piccolo agreed to a similar arbitration provision when he created an account on Disney’s website and app ahead of the ill-fated theme park visit.


Disney is fighting for a widower's wrongful death suit to be thrown out over a Disney+ trial signed up years ago after his wife died from a severe allergic reaction at the Walt Disney Parks and Resort.

But Piccolo’s lawyer, in a response filed earlier this month, argued that it was “absurd” to believe that the more than 150 million subscribers to Disney+ have waived all rights to sue the company and its affiliates in perpetuity – even if their case has nothing to do with the popular streaming service.

“The notion that terms agreed to by a consumer when creating a Disney+ free trial account would forever bar that consumer’s right to a jury trial in any dispute with any Disney affiliate or subsidiary, is so outrageously unreasonable and unfair as to shock the judicial conscience, and this court should not enforce such an agreement,” Brian Denney, Piccolo’s lawyer, wrote in the August 2 filing.

Disney, in its May 31 filing, argued that whether Piccolo actually reviewed the service terms is “immaterial”. It also noted the arbitration provision “covers ‘all disputes’ including ‘disputes involving The Walt Disney Company or its affiliates’.”

Arbitration allows people to settle disputes without going to court and generally involves a neutral arbitrator who reviews arguments and evidence before making a binding decision, or award.

Disney said that it is “deeply saddened” by the family’s loss but stressed the Irish pub is neither owned nor operated by the company. The company’s stance in the litigation doesn’t affect the plaintiff’s claims against the eatery, it added.

“We are merely defending ourselves against the plaintiff’s attorney’s attempt to include us in their lawsuit against the restaurant,” the company wrote in an emailed statement.

Raglan Road, the Irish pub in Disney Springs where Tangsuan dined, didn’t respond to an email seeking comment Wednesday. Disney Springs is owned by Disney, which leases some of the spaces in the outdoor dining, shopping and entertainment complex to other companies.

Piccolo’s lawsuit, which was filed in February, claims that he, his wife and his mother decided to eat at Raglan Road on October 5, 2023, because it was billed on Disney’s website as having “allergen free food.”

After informing their server numerous times that she had a severe allergy to nuts and dairy products, Tangsuan ordered the vegan fritter, scallops, onion rings and a vegan shepherd’s pie.

The waiter then “guaranteed” that the food was allergen-free even though some of the items were not served with “allergen free flags”, the lawsuit states.

About 45 minutes after finishing their dinner, Tangsuan had difficulty breathing while out shopping, collapsed and eventually died at the hospital, despite self-administering an EpiPen during the allergic reaction, according to the lawsuit.

A medical examiner’s investigation determined later she died as a result of “anaphylaxis due to elevated levels of dairy and nut in her system,” the lawsuit said.

An October 2 hearing has been scheduled on Disney’s motion in county court in Orlando. Piccolo seeks more than $US50,000 in his lawsuit.

AP
Philippines poverty rate at 15.5% in 2023, statistics agency says

Youths are pictured at a slum area in Baseco, Tondo city, metro Manila, Philippines
PHOTO: Reuters file

PUBLISHED ON August 15, 2024 

MANILA — The Philippines' poverty rate dropped to 15.5 per cent last year from 18.1 per cent in 2021, with rising food prices limiting the reduction in the number of poor, the government's statistics agency said on Thursday (Aug 15).

The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) said there were 17.54 million people living below the poverty line, a decrease of 2.4 million from the previous survey two years earlier.

The PSA considers individuals as "poor" if their incomes are not enough to buy basic food and non-food needs.

The government aims to reduce poverty incidence to nine per cent by the end of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's term in office in 2028.

"If food inflation had been lower, of course the reduction in poverty could be much, much bigger," National Statistician Dennis Mapa told a news conference.

The average inflation rate last year was 6.0 per cent, well above the central bank's two per cent to four per cent comfort range.

PSA conducts a family income and expenses survey every two years to determine poverty incidence and other income indicators. Over 160,000 families were interviewed for the survey, PSA said.