Sunday, December 20, 2020

Rupert Murdoch receives the Covid-19 vaccine in the UK

THE 1% GET THEIR VACCINATIONS FIRST
AT TAXPAYERS EXPENSE


“I strongly encourage people around the world to get the vaccine
as it becomes available," Murdoch said.


by Henry Goodwin December 19, 2020 in News
Rupert Murdoch, the 89-year-old News Corp boss, has become the latest 
public figure to have the coronavirus vaccine, visiting his local GP’s surgery 
on Wednesday evening to receive his first jab.
The controversial media mogul was delivered to a specialist vaccine centre 
in Henley, Oxfordshire by a convoy of Range Rovers – with the practice reportedly
 extending its normal hours at the last minute.
It sent an email out, saying: “Just a reminder – we have been advised 
‘no media coverage’ due to security issues. 
Please note that photography and video are strictly forbidden.”
A statement issued on Murdoch’s behalf said he “had the vaccine at his
 local GP’s surgery after he received a call saying he was eligible.”
“I would like to thank the keyworkers and the NHS staff who have worked 
so hard throughout the pandemic, and the amazing scientists who have made
 this vaccine possible,” he said. “I strongly encourage people around the world
 to get the vaccine as it becomes available.”
People aged over 80 are in the second tier of priority for receiving the vaccine
 – alongside frontline health and social care workers.
Murdoch – an Australian-born US citizen – has been isolating at his Oxfordshire home 
for much of the year. His endorsement of the jab echoes his British newspapers’ 
strong support of vaccination – but there have been different views in more 
extreme corners of his media empire.
On Thursday, Tucker Carlson – the rightwing Fox News host – highlighted a rare
 “bad vaccine reaction” on his programme and suggested people should view the
 “marketing campaign” “nervously”. “It feels false because it is,” Carlson said. “It’s too slick.”
Others were quick to point out the irony of Murdoch receiving the vaccine on the NHS,
 for which his papers have not always been full-throated in its support.

No comments: