Showing posts sorted by date for query ALL SAINTS DAY. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ALL SAINTS DAY. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, July 05, 2026

Progressive Patriotism for America’s 250th Birthday

Progressive believe that the core claims of this nation—fairness, equality, freedom, and justice—are their own. And they are right


“This year as a time when democracy itself is under serious threat, progressives are seeking ways to claim their patriotism and recapture the flag,” write Dreier and Flack.
(Photo by Bradyn Shock on Unsplash)
Dick Flacks
Jul 04, 2026
Common Dreams

July 4 is the big occasion for Americans to express patriotism, none more so than this year, the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding. But the ways we do so are as diverse as the country. People and groups from right to left celebrate in conflicting ways and with conflicting views—from “love it or leave it” to “love it and fix it.”

This year as a time when democracy itself is under serious threat, progressives are seeking ways to claim their patriotism and recapture the flag.

“America is beautiful, contradictory, unfinished,” wrote Zohran Mamdani last July 4 before he had been elected mayor of New York City. “I am proud of our country even as we constantly strive to make it better, to protect and deepen our democracy, to fulfill its promise for each and every person who calls it home. Happy Independence Day. No Kings in America.”

Since the American Revolution, each generation of progressives has expressed an American patriotism rooted in democratic values that challenged jingoism and “my country—right or wrong” thinking, rejecting blind nationalism, militaristic drum beating, and sheep-like conformism. Democratic movements—abolition of slavery, farmers’ populism, women’s suffrage, workers’ rights, civil rights, environmentalism, gay rights, and others—sought to overturn the established order while claiming to fulfill America’s promise. They believed that America’s core claims—fairness, equality, freedom, justice—were their own.

Even the founders would be aghast at how far Trump, and his courtiers, as well as most Republican politicians, have gone to establish an authoritarian state.

As Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., declared in a speech during the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955, “The great glory of American democracy is the right to protest for right.”.

Donald Trump consciously and cynically has been re-enacting the long tradition of patriotism as jingoism, nationalism, flag waving, and “America first” sloganeering. What seems new is his systematic drive to debase major symbols of national identity—such as the White House, the reflecting pool, and Arlington Cemetery—while wrecking the entire national plan to celebrate America at 250.

Although they disagreed on many issues, the founders were adamant that they didn’t want the country to be run by an all-powerful king. Yet here we are 250 year later, governed by a president publicly claiming such power, with a Supreme Court majority acting as his enablers,

Of course, many of the founders were skeptical of a robust democracy. They created institutions, including the Supreme Court, the Senate, and the Electoral College, that were never intended to completely reflect the voice of the people.

Even the founders, however, would be aghast at how far Trump, and his courtiers, as well as most Republican politicians, have gone to establish an authoritarian state, exploiting the opportunities provided by the Constitution’s elitist features.

The Gallup poll regularly asks Americans what the founders would think of America today. This year, only 19% think the signers of the Declaration of Independence would be pleased with how the country has turned out. Over three quarters (77%) now say the founders would be disappointed. This compares with 42% in 2001.

Americans’ disappointment with the country is obviously tied to Trump’s performance and his low favorability ratings in the polls. We expect our nation’s leaders, especially our president, to express a deep loyalty to a vision bigger than one person. But Trump has no overarching vision. Besides grabbing power and wealth for himself, his major commitment appears to white nationalism—turning America into a country for the uber rich and white people only. In contrast to the patriotism expressed in Emma Lazarus’ poem at the base of the Statue of Liberty (“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free”), Trump wants, to rid the nation of immigrants of color, whom, in his eugenicist view, he thinks “pollute” the country with bad genes.

Trump and his coterie have systematically acted to undermine the spirit and letter of the Constitution. One of America’s core beliefs since its founding has been that elections should determine who becomes president and that it is important to ensure the orderly transfer of power. But insurrectionists at the Capitol building on January 6, 2021—urged on by and loyal to Trump— attempted to stop that process, while. carrying American flags. Many of these were convicted and sentenced for insurrectionary crimes. Trump’s blanket pardon and embrace of the convicted was an announcement of his autocratic hopes and plans.

As the 250th anniversary approaches, Trump is intensifying his campaign to end the right to vote—the fundamental idea of the American Revolution. Abetted by the Supreme Court majority’s dismantling of the Voting Rights Act (a key victory of the 1960s), and building on the ongoing GOP campaign to maintain power as they lose their capacity to win the national popular vote, Trump is trying to undermine states’ control over the electoral process.

He’s used his powers to eviscerate other cherished rights, including free speech, a free press, and freedom of assembly and dissent. He has used the tools of government—including the FBI, the Justice Department, and the IRS—to unleash his revenge on protesters, the media, immigrants, Democrats, and all others he considers his opponents.

Right wingers have always wrapped themselves in the flag under the guise of being the true patriots. ‘“Americanism” campaigns in the early 20th century were designed to undermine the labor movement and limit immigration. Congressional and state legislative “Unamerican Activities” committees collaborated with the FBI beginning in the 1930s, to build blacklists against leftwing activists and artists,

Even American Nazis sought to be seen as patriots. On Feb. 20, 1939, 20,000 of them filled Madison Square Garden for a “Pro-America Rally.” They erected a massive 30-foot banner of George Washington (it was timed to celebrate his birthday) surrounded by American flags and swastika banners.

Trump’s own MAGA rallies feel like modern-day versions of that Nazi event. He fetishizes the American flag and other patriotic symbols, even while displaying a shallow, ahistorical, and bizarre understanding of what they meant.

Once, at a campaign rally in Tampa, as his cult followers chanted, “Build that wall,” Trump interrupted his speech to give a bear hug to an American flag on the stage behind him.

“We want to make sure that anyone who seeks to join our country, shares our values and has the capacity to love our people,” Trump said at a rally at the Kennedy Center in 2017.

“We all salute the same great American flag,” Trump said in his 2017 inauguration address—a line he has repeated in many speeches since then.

To Trump and his followers, the flag is synonymous with “America First.” It was a slogan used to unite isolationists and Nazi sympathizers against involvement in the European war in 1939. For Trump, it means reporting undocumented immigrants and caging their children in detention centers, restricting visitors from Muslim countries, withdrawing from the Paris climate accord and other international agreements, and engaging in friendships with like-minded dictators.

Trump’s faux patriotism and its clownish griftiness has been providing a wide space for coalitions of resistance. The “No Kings” protests and the slogan itself help provide a very fitting frame for revitalizing a progressive, democratic, populist patriotism. Many participants waved American flags.

America now confronts a new version of the Gilded Age, brought upon by Wall Street greed and corporate malfeasance.

President Barack Obama said: “I have no doubt that, in the face of impossible odds, people who love their country can change it.” He observed that, “loving your country shouldn’t just mean watching fireworks on the Fourth of July. Loving your country must mean accepting your responsibility to do your part to change it. If you do, your life will be richer, our country will be stronger.”

President Joe Biden said that “we’re all part of a chain of patriots” who fought for democracy, freedom, fair play, peace, security, and opportunity. Patriots, he explained, seek “the right to equal justice under the law; the right to vote and have that vote counted; the right to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and know that our children and grandchildren will be safe on this planet for generations to come; the right to rise in the world as far as your God-given talent can take you, unlimited by barriers of privilege or power.”

In the Sixties, as hundreds of thousands of American youth were radicalized by the senseless Vietnam war, resistance included acts of defiance of patriotic symbols and rhetoric. Flag burnings would sometimes combine with the burning of draft cards. But other radicals took a different stance. In 1968, in a famous speech against the Vietnam war, Norman Thomas, the aging leader of the rather moribund Socialist Party, proclaimed, “I come to cleanse the American flag, not burn it.”

“It was as a Socialist, and because I was a Socialist, that I fell in love with America,” wrote Michael Harrington, the founder of Democratic Socialists of America, in his 1973 book, Fragments of a Century. “In saying that, I am not indulging in romantic nostalgia about youthful days on the road but rather underlining a crucial political truth. If the Left wants to change this country because it hates it, then the people will never listen to the Left and the people will be right. To be a Socialist is to make an act of faith, of love even, toward this land. It is to sense the seed beneath the snow; to see, beneath the veneer of corruption and meanness and the commercialization of human relationships, men and women capable of controlling their own destinies. To be a radical is, in the best and only decent sense of the word, patriotic.”

Harrington was identifying with the many radicals and progressive reformers who proudly asserted their patriotism. To them, America promised democratic fulfillment—economic and social equality, mass participation in politics, free speech, and civil liberties, elimination of the second-class citizenship of women and people of color, a welcome mat for the world’s oppressed people. The reality of corporate power, right wing xenophobia, and social injustice only fueled progressives’ allegiance to these principles and the struggle to achieve them.

It is largely underrecognized that some of the most important and popular ways all Americans experience and express patriotism were the creation of radical writers and artists. What they created continues to inspire.

Francis Bellamy, a Baptist minister and Christian socialist who lived from 1855 to 1931, wrote the Pledge of Allegiance in 1892 to express his outrage at the Gilded Age’s widening economic divide. He had been ousted from his Boston church for his sermons depicting Jesus as a socialist, and for his work among the It was the Gilded Age, an era marked by major political, economic, and social conflicts. Progressive reformers were outraged by the widening gap between rich and poor, and the behavior of corporate robber barons who were exploiting workers, gouging consumers, and corrupting politics with their money. Workers were organizing unions. Farmers were joining forces in the so-called Populist movement to rein in the power of banks, railroads, and utility companies. Reformers fought for child labor laws, against slum housing, and in favor of women’s suffrage. Socialists and other leftist radicals were gaining new converts.

In foreign affairs, Americans were battling over the nation’s role in the world. America was beginning to act like an imperial power, justifying its expansion with a combination of white supremacy, manifest destiny, and the argument that it was spreading democracy. At the time, nativist groups across the country were pushing for restrictions on immigrants—Catholics, Jews, and Asians—who were cast as polluting Protestant America. In the South, the outcome of the Civil War still inflamed regional passions. Many Southerners, including Civil War veterans, swore allegiance not to the American but to the Confederate flag.

Bellamy, a cousin of Edward Bellamy, author of two bestselling socialistic books, Looking Backward and Equality, believed that unbridled capitalism, materialism, and individualism betrayed America’s promise. He hoped that the Pledge of Allegiance would promote a different moral vision to counter the rampant greed he argued was undermining the nation.

When composing the Pledge, Bellamy had initially intended to use the phrase “liberty, fraternity, and equality,” but concluded that the radical rhetoric of the French Revolution wouldn’t sit well with many Americans. So he coined the phrase, “one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all,” to express his more egalitarian vision of America, and a secular patriotism aimed at helping unite a divided nation.

In 1891, Youth’s Companion, a magazine for young people published in Boston with a circulation of about 500,000, hired Bellamy to organize a public relations campaign to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus’ so-called discovery of America by promoting use of the flag in public schools.

Bellamy gained the support of the National Education Association, along with President Benjamin Harrison and Congress, for a national ritual observance in the schools, and he wrote the Pledge of Allegiance as part of the program’s flag salute ceremony.

Bellamy thought such an event would be a powerful expression on behalf of free public education. Moreover, he wanted all the schoolchildren of America to recite the pledge at the same moment. He hoped the pledge would promote a moral vision to counter the individualism embodied in capitalism and expressed in the climate of the Gilded Age.

In 1923, over the objections of the aging Bellamy, the National Flag Conference, led by the American Legion and the Daughters of the American Revolution, changed the opening, “I pledge allegiance to my flag,” to “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.” Ostensibly, it was revised to make sure that immigrant children—who might have thought that “my flag” referred to their native countries—knew that they were pledging allegiance to the American flag.

In 1954, at the height of the Cold War—when many political leaders believed that the nation was threatened by godless communism—the Knights of Columbus led a successful campaign to lobby Congress to add the words “under God.”

A year after Bellamy composed the pledge, Kathryn Lee Bates wrote the poem “America the Beautiful,” which was later set to music by Samuel Ward, the organist at Grace Episcopal Church in Newark, New Jersey

Like Bellamy, Bates was a Christian socialist. A well-respected poet and professor of English at Wellesley College, Bates (1859-1929) was also a lesbian who lived with Katharine Coman, an economics professor. They belonged to progressive circles in the Boston area that supported labor unions, advocated for immigrants, and fought for women’s suffrage. She was an ardent foe of American imperialism.

“America the Beautiful” was initially published in 1895 to commemorate the Fourth of July. The poem is usually heard as an unalloyed paean to American virtue. But a close reading of her words makes it clear that she had something more in mind. She wrote:

America! America!
God shed His grace on thee
Till selfish gain no longer stain,
The banner of the free!

Bates hoped that a progressive movement could overcome the Gilded Age’s greed. And when sung by Ray Charles and other African American artists, listeners can’t help but be inspired by the song’s plea for brotherhood – or, as the left calls it, solidarity.

Lazarus, author of the poem inscribed on the Statue of Liberty, was a Jewish poet of considerable reputation in her day, who was a strong supporter of Henry George and his “socialistic” single-tax program, and a friend of William Morris, a leading British socialist. Her welcome to the “wretched refuse” of the Earth, written in 1883, was an effort to project an inclusive and egalitarian definition of the American Dream.

In the Depression years and during World War II, the fusion of populist, egalitarian, and anti-racist values with patriotic expression reached full flower. The rise of fascism was countered in the US with efforts to build a center-left coalition in critical support of the New Deal and a parallel cultural upsurge.

Langston Hughes’ poem, “Let America Be America Again,” written in 1936, contrasted the nation’s promise with its mistreatment of his fellow African-Americans, the poor, Native Americans, workers, farmers, and immigrants:

O, let my land be a land where Liberty
Is crowned with no false patriotic wreath
But opportunity is real, and life is free
Equality is in the air we breathe.

It’s a poem that encapsulates the anger and the hope integral to the American experience.

In 1939, composer Earl Robinson teamed with lyricist John La Touche to write “Ballad for Americans,” which was performed on the CBS radio network by Paul Robeson, at the time one of the best-known performers on the world stage, accompanied by chorus and orchestra. This 11-minute cantata provided a musical review of American history, depicted as a struggle between the “nobody who’s everybody” and an elite that fails to understand the real, democratic essence of America.

Broadcasts and recordings of “Ballad for Americans,” (by Bing Crosby as well as Robeson) were immensely popular. In the summer of 1940, it was performed at the national conventions of both the Republican and Communist parties. The work soon became a staple in school choral performances, but it was literally ripped out of many public school songbooks after Robinson and Robeson were identified with the radical left and blacklisted during the McCarthy period. Since then, “Ballad for Americans” has been periodically revived, notably during the bicentennial celebration in 1976, when a number of pop and country singers performed it in concerts and on TV. This might be the year to revive and revise it.

Earl Robinson wrote the melody for another important patriotic song of the World War 2 era -- “The House I Live In.” The lyric was written by Lewis Allen, the pen-name of a New York teacher, activist and poet named Abel Meeropol, who had, a few years earlier, written the anti-lynching anthem “Strange Fruit” for Billie Holiday.

The song was the centerpiece of an Oscar winning short film starring Frank Sinatra. In the film, Sinatra uses the song to instruct a group of kids who were bullying a Jewish classmate. Sinatra made the song a hit in 1945. Other versions were recorded by Robeson and by Josh White. Sinatra kept it in his repertoire for his whole career, even though he publicly associated with the Republican right (abandoning his earlier left-wing sympathies). Sinatra performed the song as the finale to a nationally broadcast celebration of the Statue of Liberty centenary, addressing it to Ronald and Nancy Reagan on the platform with him. Only a few watching were aware of the song’s origins.

Composer Aaron Copland’s “Fanfare for the Common Man” and “A Lincoln Portrait,” both written in 1942, are now patriotic musical standards, regularly performed at major civic events. Copland was a member of a radical composers’ group as well as a gay man.

Many Americans consider Woody Guthrie’s song “This Land Is Your Land,” penned in 1940, to be our unofficial national anthem. Guthrie, a radical, was inspired to write the song as an answer to Irving Berlin’s popular “God Bless America,” which he thought failed to recognize that it was the “people” to whom America belonged.

The song reflects Guthrie’s belief that patriotism and support for the underdog were interconnected. He celebrated America’s natural beauty and bounty, but criticized the country for its failure to share its riches. This is revealed in the song’s last and least-known verse, which Pete Seeger and Bruce Springsteen performed at Obama’s pre-inaugural concert in 2009 in front of the Lincoln Memorial, with Obama in the audience:

One bright sunny morning;
In the shadow of the steeple;
By the relief office;
I saw my people.
As they stood hungry;
I stood there wondering;
If this land was made for you and me.

You can find Spanish and Native American versions of the song. Guthrie would have approved. Both he and Seeger, who were part of Communist circles, helped popularize socially conscious music reflecting the country’s diversity. They are now viewed as American icons.

During the 1960s, American progressives continued to seek ways to fuse their love of country with their opposition to the government’s policies. The March on Washington in 1963 gathered at the Lincoln Memorial, where Martin Luther King famously quoted the words to “My Country ‘Tis of Thee,” repeating the phrase “Let freedom ring” 11 times. That 19th century song seems politically neutral, but it was a defiantly anti-monarchy anthem, written as a kind of parody of “God Save the King.” An abolitionist version soon followed its initial release. Marian Anderson, the great African American contralto, sang the song on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in 1939 because the Daughters of the American Revolution refused to allow her to perform at its Constitution Hall due to her race.

Phil Ochs, then part of a new generation of politically conscious singer-songwriters who emerged during the 1960s, wrote an anthem in the Guthrie vein, “The Power and the Glory,” that coupled love of country with a strong plea for justice and equality. The words to the chorus echo the sentiments of the anti-Vietnam War movement:

Here is a land full of power and glory;
Beauty that words cannot recall;
Oh her power shall rest on the strength of her freedom;
Her glory shall rest on us all.

One of its stanzas updated Guthrie’s combination of outrage and patriotism:

Yet she’s only as rich as the poorest of her poor;
Only as free as the padlocked prison door;
Only as strong as our love for this land;
Only as tall as we stand.

This song later became part of the repertoire of the U.S. Army band.

In recent decades, Springsteen has closely followed in the Guthrie tradition. From “Born in the USA” to his songs about Tom Joad (the militant protagonist in John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath), to his anthem about the 9/11 tragedy (“Empty Sky”), to his album Wrecking Ball (including its opening song, “We Take Care of Our Own”), Springsteen has championed the downtrodden while challenging America to live up to its ideals. In January, Springsteen wrote “Streets of Minneapolis,” which describe how “a city aflame fought fire and ice ‘neath an occupier’s boots,” which Springsteen calls “King Trump’s private army.” He wrote it in response to the second deadly shooting by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis and dedicated it to the people of that city. At the opening of Obama’s new presidential center in Chicago, Springsteen sang his song, “Land of Hope and Dreams,” which includes lines adopted from Guthrie’s song, “This Train is Bound for Glory.” The train – a metaphor for America -- carries “saints and sinners,” “losers and winners,” and “fools and kings.”

America now confronts a new version of the Gilded Age, brought upon by Wall Street greed and corporate malfeasance. Americans are upset by the unbridled selfishness and political influence-peddling demonstrated by banks, oil companies, drug companies, insurance companies, and other large corporations. They are angry at the growing power of American-based global firms who show no loyalty to their country, outsource jobs to low-wage countries, avoid paying taxes, and pollute the environment.

During the ICE raids in Minnesota a group called “Singing Resistance” emerged to encourage singing during protests. Troubadours of multiple generations sang new and classic songs of protest on stage and via You Tube.

One fascinating moment happened at this year’s Super Bowl when Coco Jones sang “Lift Every Voice and Sing.” For 100 years that song has been the African American national anthem. It lyrics include these lines:

Sing a song full of the faith that the dark past has taught us,
Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us;
Facing the rising sun of our new day begun,
Let us march on ‘til victory is won.

To have it performed at the Super Bowl, alongside the “Star Spangled Banner,” may have been an affront to right-wingers, , but it was an inspiring moment for many other Americans. Cong. James Clyburn (D-South Carolina) has sponsored a bill to make “Life Every Voice” the national hymn.

Throughout American history, progressive movements had won major victories and also experienced setbacks. When those setbacks occur, it is understandable that people sometimes lose hope, and even give up the fight. But our history also teaches us that we can’t give up, because we must keep the struggle alive for a new generation.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Peter Dreier
Peter Dreier is the E.P. Clapp distinguished professor of politics at Occidental College. He joined the Occidental faculty in January 1993 after serving for nine years as Director of Housing at the Boston Redevelopment Authority and senior policy advisor to Boston Mayor Ray Flynn. He is the author of "The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame" (2012) and an editor (with Kate Aronoff and Michael Kazin) of "We Own the Future: Democratic Socialism, American Style" and co-author of "Baseball Rebels: The Players, People and Social Movements That Shook Up the Game and Changed America" (2022).
Full Bio >

Dick Flacks
Dick Flacks is research professor of sociology at the University of California Santa Barbara. His books include: "Making History: The American Left and the American Mind;" "Beyond the Barricades: The Sixties Generation Grows Up;" "The Port Huron Statement: Sources and Legacies of the New Left's Founding Manifesto" His research and teaching centers on issues of political participation, commitment and protest. His weekly radio program, "Culture of Protest," has been on Santa Barbara radio for 25 years.
Full Bio >

Thursday, July 02, 2026

The War in Ukraine Arrives at a Crucial Juncture

by | Jul 2, 2026

Though relegated to the sidelines thanks to President Donald Trump’s decision to launch an illegal and unjustified war on Iran at the behest of the Israeli warfare state, the war in Ukraine grows more dangerous with each passing day. In fact, recent reports indicate a perilous increase in attacks on energy and civilian infrastructure from both Moscow and Kiev.

On June 17, Kiev launched the largest aerial attack of the war on Moscow with an estimated 550 drones and missiles. One attack resulted in the spectacular explosion at the Kapotnya refinery southeast of Moscow. It was the third time in a month that the refinery had been targeted by Kiev. Whether the explosion was caused by a Russian MANPAD defending Moscow or by a direct hit from a Ukrainian drone remains unclear. Shortly after the attack, a Ukrainian commander sent a message to the Russian people: “This war has now reached your homes as well. We hope that message helps Russia bring this war to an end.”

Only days later, on June 20, another attack struck the Antipinsky oil refinery in Tyumen in Western Siberia, some 1,200 miles from Ukraine. That same evening, Ukraine struck the oil terminal at Kerch in Crimea. A week later, Ukraine hit Russian refineries in the Krasnodar and Yaroslavl regions.

In response, Russian forces have struck both Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia, killing numerous civilians. For his part, Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, noted that “strikes on our infrastructure, wherever they are directed, have absolutely no effect on the situation at the front, on the line of contact.”

For Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky, there would seem to be a number of motives at play — none of which portend an end to the conflict, now in its fifth year. For one thing, Zelensky has seen a dip in the robust support he once had from Washington under Trump II. He seems convinced that such shows of force will shore up what remains of his support among Democratic war hawks, as well as among his European collaborators such as the German Chancellor Frederich Merz and the now-departing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Yet Zelensky’s stepped-up drone war, far from being, as some US analysts suggest, a show of strength, may be the beginning of the end for the budding despot, the desperate last gasp of a wartime leader with an economy in ruins, a shrinking population, and a generation of young men irretrievably lost. Putting Zelensky’s drone war into proper perspective may require recalling how ultimately ineffective the flurry of Nazi Germany’s V2 missile attacks on London and the Japanese Kamikaze attacks on the US Navy were during the final year of the Second World War.

The mood among ‘official’ Moscow has, as might be expected in light of these developments, grown darker than usual. In addition to the unprecedented drone attacks on Moscow, Russia has suffered an estimated 1.2 million war casualties, including approximately 325,000 dead. And while there are growing signs of war weariness and disgust with Putin’s regime among pro-Western elements in Moscow and St. Petersburg, there are voices close to the Kremlin that are, in a manner not terribly dissimilar to our own neoconservatives whenever Israel attacked, baying for blood.

Sergei Karaganov, an academic who heads the Kremlin’s Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, has repeatedly called for Russia to strike Europe with nuclear weapons in order to “restore deterrence.” For his part, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov promised that Russia would retaliate for the refinery attack on a “mass scale.” Lavrov also warned that the current “state of affairs poses serious threats to global security. A direct confrontation between NATO and Russia could rapidly escalate into an exchange of nuclear strikes, with catastrophic consequences.” Lavrov’s comments were originally meant for publication in POLITICO Europe, but the outlet, owned by the shamelessly pro-war Axel Springer group, pulled the piece at the last minute. Heaven forbid we hear from the “enemy” directly.

That said, with Donald Trump distracted by more pressing matters of state such as the deteriorating condition of the Reflecting Pool and his duties as host of the Great American State Fair (his promise to end this war now, as with so many other promises, forgotten) few, if any, remaining world leaders outside of Pope Leo XIV have called for a cessation of hostilities in between Russia and Ukraine and her sponsors in Washington and Brussels.

With Moscow married to its narrative, and Kiev married to its, now would seem the time for diplomacy – to assist Moscow and Kiev seek, as Kissinger once put it, a “common interest for different purposes.” Yet the war drags on. And its potential to suck both Europe and the United States into a far more disastrous conflagration grows as both parties to the conflict become increasingly desperate for a breakthrough.

James W. Carden is the author of The Great Betrayal: How the Democrats Became the Party of War. He is the editor of The Realist Review and a contributing editor at The Nation.

James W. Carden is the editor of The Realist Review.  He is a columnist and former adviser to the US-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission at the U.S. Department of State. His articles and essays have appeared in a wide variety of publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, The Spectator, UnHerd, The National Interest, Quartz, The Los Angeles Times, and American Affairs.


Strike on Kyiv cathedral highlights rush to preserve Ukrainian artifacts

(RNS) — The Ark for Ukraine project has brought three mobile labs in vans to Ukraine to help preserve Ukrainian cultural heritage by scanning archives of thousands of manuscripts, artifacts and even buildings to digitize them.


Rescue workers try to put out a fire at the Dormition Cathedral of thousand-year-old Monastery of Caves, also known as Kyiv Pechersk-Lavra, following a Russian strike on Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, June 15, 2026. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka)

David I. Klein
July 1, 2026
RNS

(RNS) — For those working to safeguard Ukraine’s religious and cultural heritage, the threats of moisture, sunlight and mishandling have taken a backseat to bullets, bombs and looting.

Up against four years of destruction and counting, a dedicated cadre of scholars, artists and museum workers in Ukraine and around the world is working to preserve and immortalize what they can — if not physically then digitally.

In mid-June, Russian drones struck an 11th-century church, Ukraine’s most important religious site. The church and its associated cave and monastery complex, called the Kyiv Perchesk-Lavra, is revered by Eastern Orthodox Christians globally and contains hundreds of icons and relics, including a crypt of saints from across the centuries.

The June 15 strike started fires in the Dormition Cathedral and damaged several other buildings on the grounds, which will take an estimated 10 million euros to restore, according to Ukrainian officials. The strike was among the most damaging to Ukraine’s cultural and religious heritage since the outbreak of the full-scale war in February 2022.

“Before this attack, we knew that they could target our culture, so we are already trying to preserve everything we can,” said Kateryna Shapovalova, the custodian of collections at the Museum of Kyiv History.



An Ark III 3D scan at Kyiv Pechersk-Lavra in Kyiv, Ukraine. (Photo © 2026 Paul Safko)

The Ark for Ukraine project, which Shapovalova is part of, has, since 2023, brought three mobile labs to Ukraine to help preserve Ukrainian cultural heritage by scanning archives of thousands of manuscripts, artifacts and even buildings to digitize them.

Shapovalova signed up to train with an ark unit after surviving a missile strike on her apartment complex that destroyed her own home.

“I want to save our culture and preserve what I can because I can see how it can stay in mine and everyone’s mentality when something precious can be destroyed,” she said, saying she felt so devastated after losing her apartment that she needed medication.

Arks I and II mobile units, established as a partnership between the national libraries of Ukraine and the Czech Republic, scan in 2D.



The Ark III mobile lab at Kyiv Pechersk-Lavra in Kyiv, Ukraine. (Photo © 2026 Paul Safko)

Ark III, a partnership between the Kyiv Perchesk-Lavra and the National Museum of the Czech Republic, takes on another dimension, equipped with drones to 3D scan everything from the smallest pieces of jewelry to entire cathedrals and monasteries.

“With all the technology we have on hand, we are able to create so-called digital twins to have perfect clones, digital clones, of all the real items,” Paul Safko, one of the architects behind ARK III, told Religion News Service.

The digital clones will never compare to seeing a real piece of history in front of your face, holding it in your hands, or in the case of Orthodox Christian worship, kissing an icon or asking a saint for intercession in the presence of their mummified body. But digital copies can be an essential tool for researchers around the world and for repairing and restoring damage.

The lab, built into the chassis of a Volkswagen Crafter van, was unveiled in front of Perchesk-Lavra in late May, less than a month before the complex was struck.

“We had to develop a unique solution, as, after I did some research, I found nothing like it existed before,” Safko said. “We decided to create a mobile station, a lab on wheels … the main idea was that if it’s in a dangerous zone, in case of an airstrike, alarm or any shooting nearby, the car is able to move, to run.”

The vans themselves have become targets, with their locations needing to be kept closely guarded, according to a spokesman for The Czech-based Karel Komarek Family Foundation, which funds the project.

The June 15 attack also struck Ukraine’s national film studio, destroying its entire historic costume collection, containing more than 100,000 outfits stretching back decades. A day earlier, a drone strike on the Kharkiv Museum of Art damaged over a thousand exhibits. And on June 16, a music hall in Dnipro and Kyiv’s National Chernobyl Museum were also damaged in attacks.

At the Museum of Kyiv History, precious underground space is saved for the most historically significant exhibits, while others are stored in aboveground safes, said Shapovalova.

The recent drone strike shattered glass throughout her museum, but that has become a normal occurrence, she explained, joking that she was thankful the history museum is in an old building rather than a modernist one with glass architecture.

According to UNESCO, some 536 registered cultural heritage sites have been verified as damaged or destroyed as of the beginning of June 2026. Of those, 154 are religious sites, like Perchesk-Lavra. A report by Ukrainian authorities estimated more than 1,700 damaged heritage sites.

In a country where 85% of the population identifies as Christian, and with longstanding Muslim and Jewish communities, those sites are a key part of Ukraine’s national identity, said Cyril Hovorun, a Ukrainian Orthodox theologian and scholar and associate dean at Sankt Ignatius Theological Academy in Sweden and senior lecturer at the Stockholm School of Theology.




Ark III 3D equipment on May 25, 2026, in Kyiv, Ukraine. (Photo © 2026 Paul Safko)

Ukraine has remained on the border of Eastern and Western worlds for much of its history.

“Ukraine never wanted to be isolated; however, it always was on the fringes of different worlds, hence the name — which means borderland,” Hovorun said. “But it wasn’t just the borderland of Moscow, but of everything else in which Ukraine participated, of the Roman world, the Arabic world, the Slavic world, you name it.”

Ukraine’s Orthodox monasteries tell of its ties to the Eastern Roman world, its Catholic cathedrals to the Western one, its mosques to the Ottoman Empire and Islamic caliphates and its synagogues and Jewish cemeteries to the global Ashkenazi Jewish culture that spread from Ukraine to America, Israel and beyond, Hovorun said.

“That continues to this day. It’s reflected in our culture, our artifacts, archeological findings, literature and the mentality of the people,” he continued. “Largely this war of Russia against Ukraine has been a war against our identity. They want to destroy and obliterate our identity, and because those sites are part of our identity, they target them.”

Russia has not acknowledged intentionally targeting Ukrainian heritage sites and denied responsibility for the attack on Perchesk-Lavra, instead blaming American armaments for the damage.

But the denial of a Ukrainian culture and history distinct and separate from Russia’s has been one of Moscow’s justifications for the war since its start.

Russia has also been accused of systematically removing evidence of that culture from the regions of Ukraine it occupies, of “Russifying” Ukrainian children, and a year ago banning the Ukrainian language from being taught in schools in the occupied regions (areas that were largely Russophone before the war.)




Rescue workers carry out temporary repairs of the roof of the Dormition Cathedral of thousand-year-old Monastery of Caves, also known as Kyiv Pechersk-Lavra, damaged after a Russian strike in Kyiv, Ukraine, Thursday, June 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka)

Lukáš Pfauser, spokesman for the Karel Komárek Family Foundation funding the Ark project with support from prominent Czech philanthropists, said that the organization was drawn to the project due to their country’s own experience as a satellite state in the Soviet bloc. Many accuse Russia’s leaders, who espouse a Russian World ideology, of trying to imitate the Soviet-era attempt at authoritarian unity.

“For 50 years we were under the totalitarian regime, so we have a huge experience from our own culture,” Pfauser said.

“The main quote in our minds was, ‘If a nation’s culture survives, then so too does the nation,’” he added, referencing the words of the famed Czechoslovak economist and art collector Jan Viktor Mládek.

Shapovalova wants everyone learning about Ukraine to know that Ukrainians are their own people, preserving their own culture that is hundreds of years old.

Ultimately, Shapovalova and her colleagues know they won’t be able to save everything.

“You always need to have priorities, and we’re always glad that we know we need to save our people first, and our items after that,” Shapovalova said.
























Friday, June 12, 2026

Opinion

I was a pagan in the military before we were recognized. We're going back.

(RNS) — Why the Department of Defense's recent decision to eliminate more than 180 religious affiliation codes has me deeply concerned.


Soldiers assigned to The United States Army Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps place American flags at headstones in Arlington National Cemetery during “Flags In” in Arlington, Va., May 21, 2026. (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Christina Alegre/DVIDS/Public Domain)


Cara Schulz
June 8, 2026 
RNS

(RNS) — I was an Air Force journalist during the first Gulf War. I remember what military life looked like before the military acknowledged that pagan service members existed and had legitimate religious needs.

Back then, the consequences showed up in very practical ways: A pagan recruit in basic training had no services to attend, deployed service members had little hope of finding spiritual support and families of the fallen fought for years simply to have their religious symbols placed on their loved one’s headstones.  

This is why the Department of Defense’s recent decision to eliminate more than 180 religious affiliation codes has me deeply concerned. People who haven’t served may not understand what the big deal is about removing the religious codes and just lumping them all in as “other.”  

Codes are everything in the military. Your job specialty has a code. Your medical status has a code. Equipment has codes. Training has codes. The military is perhaps the most structured bureaucracy in America. If it doesn’t have a code, it doesn’t exist. 

The Pentagon states these religious codes help chaplains understand the religious makeup of their units. If pagans, druids, heathens and dozens of other minority faith groups are now grouped together as “other,” how does that help chaplains understand who they are serving? 

We’re not talking about a handful of service members. Estimates suggest roughly 15,000 pagans, heathens and druids serve in the military today, according to data from the Air Force and Marines, a population similar in size to Jewish, Muslim or Buddhist service members. Under the new policy, those service members are now grouped into a generic “other” category and are effectively invisible.

I remember what it looked like when the military couldn’t see us.  



When I went through Air Force basic training in 1989, pagan wasn’t a recognized option. There were no services or spaces for pagans to meet or worship. There was no spiritual counseling available because there was no code. No code means no counting. No counting means no planning. No planning means no resources.

Basic training is one of the most stressful experiences many young people ever go through. The days are long, the pressure is constant, you’re away from family and friends, every aspect of your life is controlled by someone else and you cannot leave.

On Sundays, recruits were allowed to attend religious services. They came back refreshed after spending time with clergy and people who shared their beliefs and values. Pagans, as well as other minority religions, didn’t have that option. 
 
After the code for pagan was added in 2017, the military could identify them as a distinct community. Pagan lay leaders were appointed to help organize services and activities. Groups could request space in base chapels and other facilities. Commanders and chaplains had a way to see that a pagan population existed and plan accordingly. Volunteer pagan clergy were allowed on base to conduct services and provide fellowship and spiritual support for trainees. That’s what a code accomplishes in the military. 

Having recognition didn’t just affect chaplain support. It had ripple effects throughout the military.  

Take the outdoor worship circle at the Air Force Academy. It exists because the academy recognized pagan cadets as a distinct religious community with distinct religious needs. That recognition gave pagan cadets a dedicated worship space, the ability to host retreats and a seat on the Cadet Interfaith Council. None of that was accidental — it was the downstream consequence of being counted.  

Cadet Chapel Falcon Circle, located on the hilltop between the Academy Visitors Center and the Cadet Chapel, is dedicated May 6, 2011, at the U.S. Air Force Academy near Colorado Springs, Colorado. (Photo by Mike Kaplan/U.S. Air Force/Creative Commons)

While no one is suggesting the circle will be bulldozed, what happens going forward? Will pagans still be able to apply for use of the space? Will they, and other minority faiths that have lost their code, lose their seat on the council? How do military leaders determine demand for minority-faith facilities if the communities using them are no longer separately tracked?

The impact of recognition wasn’t limited to basic training, deployment or military life. It also mattered after a service member’s death. 

After my service ended, as a religion reporter for The Wild Hunt, a publication covering paganism, I covered the decades-long effort to secure pagan symbols on military headstones. This was known as the Pentacle Quest. 
 
In 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs finally approved the pentacle as a symbol for military headstones. This decision stemmed from decades of activism combined with a lawsuit just to grant fallen pagan service members the same dignity and recognition afforded to everyone else. 

Currently, if a family requests a pentacle for a fallen service member, the Department of Veterans Affairs checks the soldier’s official military personnel file for their religious code. If the religious code matches the family request, the headstone is approved automatically. 
 
Under the new policy, a pagan military member’s official record will list them as having “no religion” or “other.” When their family requests a pagan headstone, if the VA’s records check fails to find the matching code, the families will have to prove the veteran’s “sincerely held belief” through some other way not yet defined because the military itself stopped generating the primary proof of that faith. 
 
The Pentacle Quest wasn’t about getting a code in a database. It was about everything that flowed from that label. The military spent decades learning how to identify and support minority-faith service members.

What happens, in a system built on codes, when your code disappears?

(Cara Schulz is a former U.S. Air Force military broadcaster and reporter for The Wild Hunt who lives in Burnsville, Minnesota. She currently is an author and serves on Burnsville City Council. The opinions expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)


Defense Department rejiggers list of recognized religions after backlash, narrows it to 30

(RNS) — The fast-evolving list was met with blowback from critics who suggested its changes were an attempt to impose Christian nationalism on the military.


U.S. Soldiers from various units conduct a Juma’a on the Ramadan holiday in the chapel on Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base, Romania, April 14, 2023. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Alexander Chatoff/DVIDS/Public Domain)


Yonat Shimron and Adelle M. Banks
June 8, 2026
RNS

(RNS) — After eliminating about 180 faith groups from its list of recognized religions, the Department of Defense moved quickly to revise the list once again on Monday (June 8) in response to criticism from various religious groups.

The most updated list dropped the word “Christian” from 19 categories after pressure from two Utah senators and others who objected to a missing “Christian” label beside the name of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Defense Department also dropped the category “Christian-Other.”

The Pentagon list included redundant and unnecessary labeling, and the mistake has been fixed,” the DOW Rapid Response X account tweeted, which also listed the updated religious affiliation codes.

The Defense Department under Secretary Pete Hegseth last month pared down the list of recognized religious labels in the military from 211 to a mere 31 — the vast majority of which are various Christian denominations.

On Monday, the list included 30 faiths.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the co-chair of the Congressional Freethought Caucus, called the revised list “completely un-American and unconstitutional,” pointing to the First Amendment, which prevents the government from establishing a national religion and allows individuals to freely practice their faith.

“Religious faith in America is not meant to be managed by the government,” Raskin said in a phone call with RNS. “It’s meant to be respected and honored by the government, but not managed, much less reduced and shrunk down.”

The narrowed list ignited as much outrage from atheists, humanists, pagans, Wiccans and druids, Unitarian Universalists, deists and a host of other new age religions excluded. Members of these minority faiths told RNS their exclusion from the new list was an affront to their sincerely held beliefs by a defense secretary who seems eager to impose his own beliefs on the military.

“When someone tries to erase, cover up, or hide the diversity present in the military, they lose out on part of what makes the military amazing,” wrote Irene Glasse, a retired Marine and a Wiccan in a Facebook post. “We are a complicated mix of people from different backgrounds, regions, cultures, perspectives, classes, races, genders, and religions. It’s a big part of what makes us so effective. Diversity is a feature, not a bug.”

Stoking the fire during a Wiccans’ Monday ritual, a pair of Wiccan soldiers are among the dozen local Wiccans who are a part of the local fellowship, June 13, 2006, in Baqubah, Iraq. (Photo by Spc. Lee Elder, 133rd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment/DVIDS/Public Domain)

The change, announced May 20 via a memo from Undersecretary of Defense Anthony J. Tata, was not publicly shared until military.com reported on it June 4. The memo said the changes should take effect within 60 days.

Sean Parnell, chief Pentagon spokesman, posted on X that the move does not reflect any official designation but rather seeks to assist chaplains providing spiritual care.

“This decrease in religious affiliation codes is not designed to make any claims on the legitimacy of any faith or religious belief, nor is it intended to provide a list of ‘officially approved’ religions,” his post reads. “The Department of War places a high value on the First Amendment and the free exercise of religion. Chaplains play an instrumental role in providing spiritual care and facilitating the Warfighters’ ability to freely exercise their religion of choice, or no religion at all.”

Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints immediately questioned why their faith was listed separately from the ones labeled as Christian.

“If only we, as Latter-day Saints, belonged to a church that had ‘Jesus Christ’ in its name and His image in its logo … Oh wait,” reads a post from Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, accompanied by an image of Jesus on the church’s logo. In a video “imploring” Hegseth to change the listing, he called the change “repugnant.” He also posted that he had discussed the matter with President Donald Trump.

Later, he thanked the Defense Department for its update, saying he was “grateful to @SecWar Hegseth for correcting the error.”

Of the 30 faiths in the new recognized list, 20 are Christian denominations. The remainder include Buddhists, Jews, Baha’is, Muslims, Sikhs and people in broad categories of “no religion” or “other religions.” Among the Christian denominations, there is no distinction between various Presbyterian, Lutheran or Baptist denominations, which differ significantly on theological issues.

“There are definitely denominations here, Christian denominations, that are not listed,” said Gen. Steve Schaick, who served as Air Force chief of chaplains from 2018 to 2021, when asked by RNS about the newest list. He noted the speed with which the document has been “evolving” was highly unusual.

Members of Wiccan and other earth-based religions said the cuts to recognized faiths would make it far more difficult, if not impossible, for active-duty military personnel to request a day off for a religious holiday, have access to their faith’s sacred books or get permission to gather for a religious service or study. It would also make it far more difficult for military personnel to select a chaplain to provide active military personnel with pastoral care, they argued. 

“A disgrace” “a deliberate rebuke” and “an insult” were among the reactions on social media and in emails from members of minority faiths who had served in the military.

In a March video, Hegseth spoke of a narrower religious affiliation list, saying it was part of the reform of the chaplain corps, which he said had been “infected by political correctness and secular humanism.”

“Faith and virtue were traded for self-help and self-care,” Hegseth said, adding that “a war fighter needs more than a coping mechanism. They need truth, big T truth. They need conviction, they need a shepherd.”

To some people of minority faiths, Hegseth’s words raised fears the military might try to convert service members to a particular brand of evangelical faith, similar to Hegseth’s own evangelical Reformed tradition.

“Pete Hegseth has no idea what a chaplain does,” said Fish Stark, executive director of the American Humanist Association. “He seems to think that they’re meant to enforce his conservative Christian views, but really a chaplain’s job is to support members of the military, or wherever they serve in spiritual care, in the context of their own religious beliefs.”

Others went further, saying the cuts to as many as 180 faith traditions was an attempt to impose Christian nationalism on the military.

“This is part and parcel of that ideology,” said Nick Fish, president of American Atheists. “There are only certain people that count as authentically American. They want everybody to fit neatly in this box, and they want those boxes to be essentially evangelical Christians, and others.”

The ranks of atheists have climbed in the military, comprising up to 2% of service members, far higher than Jews and Muslims, who make up about 0.4% each, according to a military demographic study from 2019. That study found about 70% of active-duty personnel consider themselves Christian.

On Monday, American Atheists filed a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of Defense seeking official records on how this decision was made.

When the Department of Defense expanded its list in 2017, it more than doubled the number of religions it recognized. There were previously just over 100.

The Department of Defense did not respond to requests from RNS for additional comment

Schaick said the new list may be a way to assist military recruits who may have found filling out an entrance form with a large array of religious choices “exceedingly difficult for a generation that cannot distinguish the term Protestant from Lutheran.”

But he added that the new approach could prevent the tracking of numbers of subgroups and affect the diversity of the chaplains corps.

Others said it was unbecoming of the government to tell service members what faiths it recognizes.

“My entire time in uniform, I wore dogtags with the word ‘Wiccan’ below my name, number, and blood type,” said Jonathan White, a retired captain from the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps.

The elimination of so many faith traditions from the list, he said, “feels like an explicit dis-invitation to so many people who have served in the military and uniformed services. It’s not an accidental omission, but a deliberate rebuke.”

(Heather Greene contributed to this report.)