Tuesday, July 06, 2021

Nikole Hannah-Jones rejects UNC tenure offer for position at Howard University

BY DOMINICK MASTRANGELO - 07/06/21

Journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones on Tuesday announced she has decided to reject an offer to serve as the chair of the journalism department at the University of North Carolina, and that she will take a similar position at Howard University.

The decision follows a massive controversy at the North Carolina school, which initially did not offer Hannah-Jones tenure.

"It's a very difficult decision, not one I wanted to make," she told Gayle King on "CBS This Morning."

Hannah-Jones said she will serve as the inaugural Knight chair in race and reporting at Howard, a historically Black university in Washington, D.C.

University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill trustees last week voted to approve tenure for the New York Times Magazine journalist after a broad backlash against their initial decision.

The move to at first deny her tenure came after conservative groups complained about her involvement in the creation of the Times’s 1619 Project.

“Today’s outcome and the actions of the past month are about more than just me," Hannah-Jones said when UNC approved tenure for her.



"This fight is about ensuring the journalistic and academic freedom of Black writers, researchers, teachers, and students. We must ensure that our work is protected and able to proceed free from the risk of repercussions, and we are not there yet. These last weeks have been very challenging and difficult and I need to take some time to process all that has occurred and determine what is the best way forward."

On Tuesday, Hannah-Jones said that "to be denied it, and to only be granted tenure on the last possible day at the last possible moment after legal action, after weeks of protests, after it became a national scandal, it's just not something I wanted anymore."

Hannah-Jones initially accepted a teaching position at UNC without tenure, but said it was "embarrassing to be the first person [to serve as chair] to be denied tenure," and added she never wanted to create a national scandal over her hiring and tenure status.

"This has not become public because of anything I did," she said, noting that she was the first Black person to be tapped as chair of the department at UNC.

In a statement issued through the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Hannah Jones criticized UNC for the way she said she was treated through the hiring and tenure approval process.

“I was the first Black Knight Chair at UNC since the position was founded and the only one to be appointed without tenure. I would come to learn that not only had there been political interference, but the school’s top donor had been lobbying against me and questioning my credentials and integrity as a journalist," Hannah Jones said.

"I was determined to remain silent and to not comment to the press or to engage in the controversy, even as the man whose name is on the school of journalism where I would work continuously impugned my character and my work in the media, even going as far as to question whether I am a Black separatist," she continued.

“These last few weeks have been very dark. To be treated so shabbily by my alma mater, by a university that has given me so much and which I only sought to give back to, has been deeply painful."

She called the pushback on her appointment and fight for tenure a "dangerous attack on academic freedom," saying the UNC administration "sought to punish me for the nature of my work, attacks that Black and marginalized faculty face all across the country."

Ta-Nehisi Coates to join Howard University faculty

Democratic strategist Joe Trippi to join Lincoln Project

Also on Tuesday, Howard University announced journalist Ta-Nehisi Coates would be joining the school's faculty.

“That really is the community that made me,” Coates, who attended Howard, told The Washington Post. “I would not be who I am without the faculty at Howard.”

Updated 10:46 a.m.

Israel-Palestine: Life in Sheikh Jarrah has become a 'big prison' under Israeli siege

Israeli forces closed off the Palestinian neighbourhood in May, denying entry to visitors and controlling the movements of its Palestinian residents

A Palestinian woman stands by the gate of her home in Karm al-Jaouni and looks towards the house that Israeli settlers forcibly took from the Palestinian Ghawi family (MEE/Aseel Jundi)


By 
Aseel Jundi in Sheikh Jarrah, occupied East Jerusalem
Published date: 6 July 2021 


In the closed-off Karm al-Jaouni area in the Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood, Palestinian residents describe life under a perpetual threat of forced expulsion as akin to being imprisoned in their own homes under constant Israeli scrutiny and restriction of movement.

Cement blocks meet visitors as they approach the neighbourhood, with Israeli police forces denying entry to non-residents. The only option left for those who wish to enter the area is to navigate their way around rooftops and reach the heart of Karm al-Jaouni, where families are threatened with removal from their homes to make way for Israeli settlers.

The settlers who have occupied the house of the Ghawi family since 2009 stand, on alert, in front of the outpost at all times. Meanwhile, Palestinian residents try to get some much-needed rest during the day in anticipation of new rounds of attacks by settlers around sunset.

'I am 51 years old, but it feels like I’ve lived 1,000 years of worry,' says Saleh Diab (MEE/Aseel Jundi)

Behind the gate of Saleh Diab’s house, fragments of glass and stones of different sizes thrown by settlers in daily attacks are strewn around the yard. Israeli forces also regularly target the house, under the pretext that visiting solidarity activists attack the settler outpost opposite, leaving behind remnants of stun grenades and tear gas canisters.

“I am 51 years old, but it feels like I’ve lived 1,000 years of worry,” Diab tells Middle East Eye.

Palestinian children feel 'abandoned by the world' after Israel demolished their homes  Read More »

“I have suffered every day from Israeli occupation measures since I turned 17. I’ve been detained around 20 times since, and expelled from Sheikh Jarrah five times.”

Exhaustion is etched on Diab’s face, whose home is surrounded by three settler outposts. The first, facing his house, used to belong to the Ghawi family before it was forcibly taken by settlers under the protection of Israeli forces. The second one, located to the right, is the Kurd’s family home, which has been partially occupied by settlers. However, it’s the third outpost that is the most problematic for the family. Situated right behind their house is the sacred shrine of Shimeon al-Siddiq (founder of the Israelite tribe of Simeon), which many Jews visit to perform Talmudic rites.

Diab says that a week after the Ghawi family was forcibly removed from their home in 2009, eight other families in Sheikh Jarrah received eviction orders for the benefit of settlers.

“Since that day, we have been living in tragic conditions devoid of security and stability,” Diab says.

“The most difficult thing I have faced since is my children’s repeated questions about our fate after eviction, their academic future, and other answers that I cannot find the answers to.”

On 16 May, after a suspected car-ramming incident, the Israeli police placed cement blocks at three locations around the neighbourhood, with military police forces manning the posts at all times. Since then, Diab has been forced to keep his personal ID on him when out, in case he needs to go to the grocery store at the entrance to the neighbourhood.

“The permanent security posts have turned our lives into hell,” he says.

'The most difficult thing I have faced since is my children’s repeated questions about our fate after eviction'

- Saleh Diab, Sheikh Jarrah resident


“We have become prisoners in our own home as they prevent non-residents from entering the neighbourhood, forcing us to present our IDs and asking us questions, just like an interrogation, whenever we need to leave or enter.”

Diab stays up guarding his house until sunrise, before his brother takes over the watch in fear of a sudden attack by settlers.

“I fear the recurrence of what happened to the Dawabsheh family when settlers burned their house in the village of Duma while they were sleeping,” he says, in reference to the 2015 attack that killed a Palestinian couple, their 18-month-old son, and left four-year Ahmed Dawabsheh badly burned.

Every now and then, Diab goes to the iron gate, on a leg fractured by Israeli forces during attacks in May, to inspect the situation on the street and talk to neighbours before returning home.

“In this house, there are 23 members of the Diab family, including 11 children, living a harsh present and their future is bleak.”
‘This is my house’

In the house of the Ghousheh family, Maysoun and her two daughters sit with three men who had managed to sneak into the neighbourhood to offer solidarity.


Maysoun, who has been living in Sheikh Jarrah since 1990, tells MEE that after her neighbour Um Kamel al-Kurd was evicted from her home in 2008, all of the residents have been living the nightmare of forcible displacement.

Mayar Ghousheh poses in the courtyard of the Kurd family home (MEE/Aseel Jundi)

“Every day I start my morning waiting for the worst to happen,” she says, her voice cracking with anguish.

“The occupation authorities have prevented my family from visiting me, and the one time I tried to visit them, Israeli female soldiers guarding one of the security posts violently attacked us inside our car.”

The military post inches closer to Maysoun’s house day after day.

Two Israeli soldiers stationed themselves at the gate while MEE’s team was inside the house and even asked to see Maysoun’s ID, which she refused to show, saying in Hebrew: “This my house, and I don’t have to show you any proof.”

Maysoun says the situation has been particularly difficult on her youngest daughter, Mayar, who refused to go to school for two weeks out of fear that she would not be allowed to get back to her house.


'Every day I start my morning waiting for the worst to happen'
- Maysoun Ghousheh, Sheikh Jarrah resident

Maysoun tells MEE that the 11-year-old was recently referred to the school’s social worker as she suffers psychological distress, including insomnia, due to the developments in the neighbourhood.

Mayar looks at her mother, turns around, opens the main gate, casts a quick look around and dives back inside the house.

After Israeli forces closed off Sheikh Jarrah, Mayar says she has taken to buying sweets and cold drinks to sell to the neighbourhood’s residents.

“The siege pushed me to open a small grocery store in our house,” she says.
Aspiring journalists

Mayar says she dreams of becoming a journalist to relay the crisis in Sheikh Jarrah to the world, but she is not the only one.
14-year-old Nufuth Hammad has been documenting the lives of Sheikh Jarrah's residents (MEE/Aseel Jundi)

Outside the Ghousheh home, 14-year-old Nufuth Hammad roams the streets with a notepad and a pen, gathering the testimonies of Sheikh Jarrah’s elders about their past and present lives in the neighbourhood.

Despite being detained last month, Hammad walks confidently and without fear of armed settlers and Israeli forces, who patrol the streets around the clock.


“I am fully aware that I could be arrested at any moment because our movements are restricted, even within the neighbourhood itself,” she tells MEE.

“Is there a childhood harsher than ours?”

Saving Lifta: Palestinians rally against latest threat to depopulated Jerusalem village   Read More »


Hammad was detained after a settler filed a complaint against her for drawing the Palestinian flags on children’s faces and listening to a song about Jerusalem with her friends, saying that such songs are sound pollution and that she should not be allowed to glorify the Palestininan flag while living on Israeli land.

The Israeli police interrogated Hammad for several hours before releasing her.

The Hammad family was forcibly displaced from the city of Haifa during the Nakba, or Catastrophe, in 1948. The family moved to Karm al-Jaouni in 1956 as part of an initiative by Jordan and the UN agency for Palestinian refugees to settle 28 families in Jerusalem in return for their UNRWA documents.

The selected families were provided with housing units, built by the Jordanian government, for three years, after which the ownership of the property was transferred to them.

Hammad’s grandfather, Aref, a member of the Sheikh Jarrah Refugees Housing Units Committee, says that 160 residents have received eviction orders in recent months, including 46 children coming from 12 different families.

According to Aref, there are 28 extended refugee families, composed of 500 members in total, living in an area of 18 dunums in Karm al-Jaouni.

Back at the home of the Ghousheh family, 11-year-old Mayar reflects on recent events and the terrible impact they have had on her, physically and emotionally.

“My life has completely turned around in the last few months. I’ve been wounded several times in the daily attacks by police forces and settlers, and stun and tear gas grenades have destroyed our windows,” she says.

“I’ve endured many things that I’m not supposed to go through as a child.”
Israel's colonial violence and international humanitarian aid

July 6, 2021 

A Palestinian man carries on his shoulder sacks of flour received from a United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) distribution centre in Jabalia refugee camp in the northern of Gaza Strip , on January 29, 2020 [MAHMUD HAMS/AFP via Getty Images]


Ramona Wadi
walzerscent
July 6, 2021 


Whenever Israel bombs Gaza, donor countries are expected to raid their treasuries and manage the resultant humanitarian crisis. The aftermath of the latest colonial aggression against the enclave is no different. On one hand, the reconstruction of Gaza will probably follow previous mechanisms in which the UN plays a role that is decided by Israel. For the Palestinian people's immediate needs, now more precarious than ever, the Israeli government is seeking countries willing to stand alongside Qatar to help desperate Palestinian families.



Death toll in Israeli attacks on Gaza Strip keeps rising…- Cartoon [Sabaaneh/MiddleEastMonitor]

Two European countries have so far been approached, Germany and another one are as yet unnamed. Israel has attempted to exploit reconstruction to demand the release of two Israeli civilians and the bodies of two Israeli soldiers held by Hamas. Palestinian factions reject this and communicated their decision to the UN in June.

So far the only dilemma raised by the international community is the question of rebuilding Gaza without Hamas involvement, ostensibly to ensure that funds and material are accessed only by the Palestinian people. To implement such a strategy, the Palestinian Authority – a body whose corruption is known to the international donors which continue to fund it — would play a role alongside Israel. The PA has contributed to Gaza's humanitarian predicament through sanctions of its own imposed with the intention to destabilise Hamas and reduce its political support and influence. It is in no position to guarantee that aid will reach the people most in need without PA officials from the top downwards pocketing their "share" first. It is foolish to believe otherwise.

READ: Children in Gaza call on the world to save them

Since the international community has equated Palestinians with humanitarian aid, there is little questioning of Israel's expectation that individual countries will provide humanitarian assistance after its bombs have finished destroying Palestinian lives and infrastructure. Equally disturbing is that the international community does not challenge the status quo of tidying up the mess after Israel's carnage. It's more of the same: the US pays for the bombs; others pay for the clean-up.

Billions of US dollars in military aid have disfigured Gaza beyond any hope of proper reconstruction, given Israel's frequent bombing of the enclave. The international community, blinded as it is by Israel's twisted security narrative, has no qualms about the territory being used as the testing ground for the settler-colonial state's new weapons because Palestinians are part of a dissociated humanitarian narrative that is profitable for both the coloniser and the donors.

Humanitarian aid is supposed to be a temporary endeavour, not part of Israel's colonisation plans. When the humanitarian crisis is exacerbated, Israel seeks to keep Palestinians quiet through its European allies. These are the same allies that purportedly champion the establishment of "an independent and viable Palestinian state."

READ: Israel launches airstrikes on Gaza

Meanwhile, through donations to keep Palestinians quiet, humanitarian aid provides more benefits for Israel than incentives for the people. The politics of humanitarian aid focus on preventing the emergence of a Palestinian state. In Gaza, humanitarian aid after the destruction of the infrastructure keeps Palestinians focused on the imminent matter of survival, thus pushing political action by the people further out of the equation.

Without addressing Israel's culpability and accountability, it seems that it will have no problems in recruiting countries to repair the damage that its bombs and politics inflict upon Palestinians in Gaza. Calls to hold Israel accountable, and for sanctions to be enforced against the settler-colonial state, pass unheeded. When countries step up with their financial assistance for Palestinians in Gaza, let it be known that the humanitarian façade cannot compensate for the political damage inflicted through collaboration with the murderous, rogue state of Israel.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
In Germany, burning the Israeli flag is a problem, but killing Palestinians isn't

July 6, 2021 

German ambassador in France Susanne Wasum-Rainer in Paris, on April 25, 2014 [PIERRE ANDRIEU/AFP via Getty Images]


Motasem A Dalloul
abujomaaGaza
July 6, 2021 

Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Idan Roll met with the German Ambassador, Susanne Wasum-Rainer, on Monday along with visiting German parliamentarians. Roll thanked the German guests for their country's strong support for Israel during its major military offensive against the Palestinians in Gaza from 10-21 May.

Germany's unlimited support and cooperation make it a special friend of Israel. Among EU members it is the second-biggest supplier of weapons to the occupation state. Between 2009 and 2020, 24 per cent of Israel's arms imports came from Germany.

When Israel treats international law, human rights, democratic principles, and liberal beliefs with contempt, Germany automatically takes its side, even when the result is the killing of innocent children and women. During the latest Israeli offensive, Germany supported Israel's "right to defend itself" although it was killing civilians and destroying civilian buildings and infrastructure. The fact that an occupying state has no right to claim "self-defence" against the people under occupation was ignored by the Germans.

On 12 May, a German government spokesman, Steffen Seibert, refused to condemn Israel's killing of 14 Palestinian children. He referred to the legitimate Palestinian resistance as "terrorist attacks" and that the resistance groups had to stop their action against Israel so that "people do not die".

READ:
Palestine slams German president's claim ICC lacks jurisdiction to investigate Israel

Seibert ignored the Israeli warplanes pounding the besieged Gaza Strip. He ignored the Israeli tanks firing indiscriminately towards densely-populated areas across Gaza. He ignored weeks of Israeli harassment and attacks on Palestinians worshipping in Al-Aqsa Mosque throughout Ramadan, and the residents of Jerusalem facing attacks by illegal settlers, which prompted the resistance groups to act. He ignored all of that.

On the same day, the deputy spokesman of the German Foreign Ministry, Christofer Burger, angered journalists when he said that the Palestinians had no right to self-defence. His claim that this right is only guaranteed by international law to sovereign states and Palestinians are not a state was palpable nonsense. All people living under occupation, collectively and individually, have the right to defend themselves and resist military occupation. Israel's occupation of Palestine is a military occupation.

On day ten of the Israeli offensive, when the occupation state had killed 66 children, 40 women, and 16 elderly people out of 266 Palestinians killed in total, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas insisted that, "Germany stands with Israel and its right to defend itself." He even visited Israel to prove that his country's support was not limited to words. "I came to Israel to show solidarity and support Israel. Israel's security and that of the Jewish residents here are not negotiable."



German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas in Berlin, Germany on June 23, 2021 [Abdulhamid Hoşbaş/Anadolu Agency]

Two days earlier, German Chancellor Angela Merkel called the then Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and "sharply condemned the continued rocket attacks from Gaza on Israel and assured the prime minister of the German government's solidarity." She showed great interest in Israel's security and safety of its people and condemned only the legitimate Palestinian resistance.

Germany's verbal support for Israeli brutality and aggression against the Palestinians was backed up by officials who claimed that peaceful protests during which Palestinian flags were flown and anti-Israel slogans were chanted were "anti-Semitic". Calls for Israel to be held accountable for its breaches of international law were described as "hate speech".

According to Seibert, "Anyone who uses such protests to shout out their hatred of Jews is abusing the right to protest [in Germany]." He described the pro-Palestine protests which raised awareness about the ongoing Israeli crimes as "anti-Semitic rallies", and stressed that they "will not be tolerated by our democracy."

During a debate in the German parliament during the Israeli offensive on Gaza, Maas condemned the pro-Palestine demonstrations and called for a violent crackdown on them. "There shouldn't be one centimetre of space for anti-Semitism on our streets. Never again."

Germany has since banned the Hamas flag in the country in response to pro-Palestine demonstrations. "We do not want the flags of terrorist organisations to be waved on German soil," Thorsten Frei, a lawmaker for Merkel's CDU, told Die Welt. A ban, he added, would send "a clear signal to our Jewish citizens."

President Frank-Walter Steinmeier told Israeli daily Haaretz that Germany believes that the International Criminal Court (ICC) has no jurisdiction to investigate Israeli war crimes in the occupied Palestinian territories because of the "absence of the Palestinian state". Germany is not only unconcerned about Israeli crimes against the Palestinians, but also does not even want those crimes to be investigated. Palestine was, of course, granted the status of a "non-member observer state" by the UN in November 2012, a move described as "de facto recognition of the sovereign state of Palestine".

Writing in Open Democracy, activist and sociologist Inna Michaeli said that Germans are against the entirely peaceful Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement which seeks to end the Israeli occupation. Moreover, apparently, they do not like to hear anyone accusing Israel of killing children, despite this being "a description of horrendous reality — one in three Palestinians that Israel kills in Gaza are children."




The targeting and arrest of Palestinian children has been a constant Israeli policy – Cartoon [Sabaaneh/MiddleEastMonitor]

She asked rhetorically: "What should people chant when Israel is killing children? How can the victims express their rage and sorrow, how can they mourn their children who are killed again and again by Israel?"

Even the German mainstream media ignores Israeli brutality against the Palestinians. "Much of the mainstream media coverage of Nakba Day demonstrations did not even mention nor explain to the readers what the Nakba is, and its continuation in the form of ethnic cleansing and denial of Palestinians' right to return," Michaeli pointed out. "Berlin, with the largest Palestinian population in Europe, is home to people whose family members have been murdered by Israel in recent days. These protests are often framed as 'anti' Israel, but the fact that they are primarily 'for' Palestinian life is omitted."

Omri Boehm is an Israeli philosophy lecturer in New York. "Whenever one attempts to raise this subject, one is immediately accused of anti-Semitism," he noted. "It is impossible to simply state the facts. For example, that within Israel's borders, three million Palestinians live under brutal military law without being recognised as Israeli citizens. The Germans do not want to see this."

OPINION: Israel's siege and violence are damaging Palestinian children's minds

When pro-Palestine protesters burned an Israeli flag in Germany, Interior Minister Horst Seehofer described the act as "anti-Semitic" and said that Germany would crack down hard on anyone found to be spreading "anti-Semitic hatred" because "We will not tolerate Israeli flags burning on German soil."

Commenting on this, Michaeli said: "Israeli flags matter, Palestinian lives do not. When people, politicians, and the media, care more about the burning of national flags than the burning of homes and neighbourhoods and the killing of entire families, they should really have a hard look at themselves."

German support for Israel goes back to the early 1950s when reparations were paid to the state as the "heir" to the Holocaust victims who had no known surviving family. Billions of German marks and euros have been handed over in the intervening decades, helping to build Israel as a state. The fact that this is largely to the detriment of the people of occupied Palestine has, shamefully, been lost on successive German governments. Those parliamentarians who met Israeli officials earlier this week need to be educated about international laws and conventions, and the reality of Israel's brutal military occupation which they and their colleagues in Berlin endorse so willingly.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

 MORE DISASTER POSTS

A Gas Leak Caused A Fire In The Gulf Of Mexico And The Videos Are Unreal

"Oh cool they've opened the portal to Hell."

Posted on July 2, 2021, at 7:28 p.m. ET

A fire broke out in the southern waters of the Gulf of Mexico Friday after an underwater pipeline leaked, sending the internet ablaze with horror as videos of flames spewing out of the ocean went viral

Mexican-state-owned petroleum company Petróleos Mexicanos, also known as Pemex, said a gas leak was discovered in the 12-inch submarine pipeline near a platform in the Ku-Maloob-Zaap oil field. Firefighting crews were able to snuff out the swirling, fiery mass of water by about 10:45 a.m., the company said. No injuries were reported.

Ángel Carrizales, executive director of Mexico's oil safety regulatory agency ASEA, tweeted that the leak "did not generate any spill," but did not say what exactly was on fire.

The cause of the incident is still under investigation, but as usual, Twitter users had their own ideas about what exactly was going on.

Footage of the fire looked so unreal that some wondered if, or hoped that, it was fake.

Others couldn't help but poke fun at the cruel irony of fighting a fire in the water with...water.

Portal to hell or not, maybe someone is trying to tell us something.


Southern pastors are scared to promote vaccines as white Evangelicals reject science: report
Bob Brigham
July 03, 2021

The conspiracy originally took root in the United States but has spread to Europe Joseph Prezioso AFP

As formerly Confederate states struggle with low vaccination rates as the Delta variant of coronavirus spreads across America, pastors stuck between the science of what is best for their flocks and superstitions that their congregants believe.

"Biden administration and state officials hoped that pastors would play an outsized role in promoting Covid-19 vaccines, but many are wary of alienating their congregants and are declining requests to be more outspoken. Politico spoke with nearly a dozen pastors, many of whom observed that vaccination is too divisive to broach, especially following a year of contentious conversations over race, pandemic limits on in-person worship and mask requirements. Public health officials have hoped that more religious leaders can nudge their congregants to get Covid shots, particularly white evangelicals who are among the most resistant to vaccination," the publication reported Saturday.

"State health officials are conducting informal focus groups and outreach to try to ease pastors' concerns about discussing vaccination, but progress is often elusive, they said. Many pastors said they have already lost congregants to fights over coronavirus restrictions and fear risking further desertions by promoting vaccinations. Others said their congregations are so ideologically opposed to the vaccine that discussing it would not be worth the trouble," Politico explained. "The pastors Politico spoke with are located across Virginia and Tennessee, mostly in predominantly white communities. Some in rural areas lead overwhelmingly conservative congregations while some in more suburban areas said their churches were more politically mixed. Each pastor had been vaccinated but not all were eager to discuss it with their congregations."
Chris Matthews talks to Raw Story: Who would you bet on in 2024, Trump or Kamala?

Polls have shown white Evangelical Christians are among the groups most opposed to vaccination.



NIH Director Francis Collins worried about the public health implications as some Americans reject vaccines.

"It's heartbreaking that it's come to this over something that is potentially lifesaving and yet has been so completely colored over by political views and conspiracies that it's impossible to have a simple loving conversation with your flock," Collins told Politico. "That is a sad diagnosis of the illness that afflicts our country, and I'm not talking about Covid-19. I'm talking about polarization, tribalism even within what should be the loving community of a Christian church."

France denies covering-up nuclear tests near French Polynesia in Pacific
Agence France-Presse
July 03, 2021

A picture taken in 1971 showing a nuclear explosion in Mururoa atoll, French Polynesia. © AFP (file photo)

The French government on Friday denied any cover-up over radiation levels in the Pacific following its nuclear testing in the region, as state-backed discussions took place in Paris about the legacy of the explosions.

A two-day meeting called by French President Emmanuel Macron began on Thursday following fresh allegations that the testing from 1966 to 1996 caused hidden atmospheric and ground radiation.

"There was no state cover-up," Genevieve Darrieusseq, junior defense minister, told AFP in a brief comment on the sidelines of the event, where she has ruled out any official apology from France

In March, the investigative website Disclose created waves when it said it had analyzed some 2,000 pages of declassified French military documents about the nearly 200 tests carried out around French Polynesia.

Working with statistical experts and academics from Princeton University in the US, it concluded that "French authorities have concealed the true impact of nuclear testing on the health of Polynesians for more than 50 years."

The roundtable discussions have been attended by three French ministers, as well as Macron himself, who made no public comment after taking part on Thursday.

Edouard Fritch, the president of French Polynesia, a semi-autonomous French territory, said Macron had promised to open up the military archives about the tests, a key demand from historians, and would visit Tahiti on July 25.

Only records that could lead to nuclear proliferation are to remain secret.

"We felt that the president had a real desire to turn this painful page for all of us, with the resources that will need to be put in place in the future, so that Polynesians can rebuild the faith that we have always had in France," Fritch said Friday.

The event has met with criticism from some Polynesian politicians as well as anti-nuclear campaigners and historians, who say they have been blocked from properly investigating by state secrecy laws.

Moetai Brotherson, a supporter of independence who sits in the national parliament representing the archipelago, refused to attend unless France apologized for the tests.

His party, the Tavini Huiraatira, said it would organize a rival event in Tahiti on Friday.

Compensation


Over the last year, Macron has shown a willingness to tackle historically taboo issues for France, including its bloody colonial history in Algeria and its role in Rwanda in the lead up to the 1994 genocide.

The nuclear tests remain a source of deep resentment and anger in French Polynesia, where they are seen as evidence of colonial or even racist attitudes that disregarded the lives of islanders.

The US and Britain also carried out dozens of nuclear tests in the Pacific during the Cold War arms race.
Report Advertisement

Up until now only 63 French Polynesian civilians, excluding soldiers and contractors, have received compensation for exposure to radiation from the nuclear tests, according to Disclose.

The website said it had reassessed the pollution on the Gambier Islands, Tureia and Tahiti following the six nuclear tests considered to be the most contaminating in the history of French tests in the Pacific.

It claimed that its conclusions were starkly different to those of the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), whose figures served as the reference for compensation for victims of the tests.

In one instance, Disclose said radioactive soil deposits on an atoll had been underestimated by more than 40 percent, while more than 100,000 people might have been contaminated in total.

Protests


France conducted 193 nuclear tests over three decades in French Polynesia until former president Jacques Chirac ended the program in the 1990s amid an international protest campaign.

In 2016, former president Francois Hollande acknowledged during a trip to the region that the tests had "an impact" on health and the environment and promised to revamp the compensation process.

From 1960 to 1966, France also carried out 17 nuclear tests at desert sites in Algeria, where campaigners continue to press for compensation and clean-ups.

(AFP)


  1. - The Birth of Godzilla - Orange Nebula - Articles

    https://www.orangenebula.com/the-outpost/the-birth-of-godzilla

    2021-03-08 · While this use of nuclear energy is a distant cry of its more destructive uses, the story of Godzilla starts germinating a few months earlier in March of 1954. On March 1, 1954, 


  • Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior - Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_Rainbow_Warrior

    France began testing nuclear weapons in 1966 on Mururoa Atoll in the Tuamotu Archipelago of French Polynesia. In 1985 eight South Pacific countries, including New Zealand and Australia, signed a treaty declaring the region a nuclear-free zone.
    Since being acquired by Greenpeace in 1977, Rainbow Warrior was active in supporting a number of anti-whaling, anti-seal hunting, anti-nuclear testing and anti-nuclear waste dumping campaigns during the lat…

    Wikipedia · Text under CC-BY-SA license
  • Greenpeace Protests French Nuclear Tests in the Mururoa ...

    https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/legal-and-political-magazines/...
    • By:Philippe Wojazer Date:September 1, 1995 Source:Wojazer, Philippe. "Greenpeace Protests French Nuclear Tests in the Mururoa Atoll." AP Images. About the Photographer: Philippe Wojazer is a contributor to the Associated Press, a worldwide news agency based in New York.

  • Brazil's Bolsonaro faces more corruption allegations


    Issued on: 06/07/2021 - 
    FI
    LE PHOTO: Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro gets in a vehicle after attending Mass at a Catholic church in Brasilia, Brazil July 1, 2021. © Adriano Machado, Reuters

    Text by:NEWS WIRES


    Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro was involved in a scheme to skim salaries of his aides while a federal deputy, website UOL reported on Monday, citing what it said were audios of his former sister-in-law explaining his role in the alleged racket.

    The scheme, known locally as rachadinha, involves hiring close associates as employees and then receiving a cut of their public salaries back from them.

    Rio de Janeiro state prosecutors have formally pressed charges against federal Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, the president's eldest son, over his alleged participation in a similar racket when he was a state lawmaker.

    The UOL story, based on audio recordings of Bolsonaro's former sister-in-law, Andrea Siqueira Valle, provided by a source, is the first time the president has been directly implicated in a rachadinha scheme, despite numerous awkward questions about his role in Flavio Bolsonaro's alleged racket in Rio.

    This comes as Bolsonaro is seeing his anti-graft credentials, which helped get him elected president in 2018, questioned by a simmering scandal over alleged corruption in the government's vaccine procurement efforts.


    Senator Renan Calheiros, sponsor of a Senate inquiry into the government's handling of the pandemic, said on Monday that Siqueira Valle could be called before the committee for questioning.

    While the rachadinha is not directly connected to the Senate inquiry, it adds to recent allegations about irregularities in the government's purchase of vaccines and calls into question Bolsonaro's anti-corruption platform.

    The president's office declined to comment. A lawyer representing Bolsonaro contacted by UOL denied illegalities.

    In one audio recording, Andrea Siqueira Valle explains that her brother, Andre Siqueira, who was also on Bolsonaro's payroll, was fired for refusing to hand back the agreed amount to the now-president.

    "André had a lot of trouble because he never returned the right money that had to be returned," she says on the recording.

    "Eventually, Jair said ... 'Enough. You can get rid of him because he never gives me the right amount of money.'"

    Reuters was unable to confirm the legitimacy of the recordings or the information in the story. Andrea Siqueira Valle declined to comment to UOL.


    Daily newsletterReceive essential international news every morningSubscribe

    UOL also reported that on two separate occasions, Siqueira Valle told people close to her about the racket allegedly being run from Bolsonaro's office.

    The accusations against Bolsonaro for allegedly misusing public funds as a federal lawmaker could open him up to a federal probe.

    However, Brazilian law does not allow a sitting president to be charged for any crime committed before taking power.

    Instead, prosecutors would need to wait until the president has left office to bring charges.

    (REUTERS)