Sunday, March 20, 2022

The cost of living may be going up, but wages are rising, too

Demand for labour giving workers the upper hand for

raises

A 'now hiring' sign at Gerrity's Supermarket in Scranton, Penn, on Feb. 24. Numbers suggest that in this job market, if you're not getting a raise, it's time to change jobs because chances are it will pay more. (Hannah Beier/Bloomberg)

Inflation has risen to its highest point in a generation, pushing up the price of just about everything. But that goes for people's labour, too, as employers compete to keep up with their staffing needs.

Officially, wages have risen by only 3.1 per cent in the past year, about half the official inflation rate of 5.7 per cent. But because the pandemic had such an unprecedented impact on everything — including statistics — it can be helpful to compare things today to how they were two years ago, before COVID-19. 

Inflation is up by almost seven per cent in the two-year period up to the end of February, and wage data shows an interesting split between people who have changed jobs recently, and those who've stayed in the same one.

That former group — which the data agency defines as anyone who has been on their current job for three months or less — has seen its average hourly wage increase by 11.7 per cent. That compares to an increase of 7.2 per cent, about the same as the inflation rate, for those who've stayed in their same job for more than 18 months.

Those numbers suggest that in this job market, if you're not getting a raise, it's time to change jobs because chances are it will pay more.

Darcy Clark, a principal with Montreal-based HR consultancy Normandin Beaudry, said the competition for workers is fierce right now.

"Much like the housing market, it's unbalanced," he said.

"Whether you're hourly, production, salaried, management, executive and everything in-between, it's across the board a war for talent."

Companies are ratcheting up their compensation packages at a steady clip to meet their staffing needs. In the summer of 2021, the companies that work with Normandin Beaudry said they expected to increase their compensation by 2.9 per cent in the coming year — on the high side historically, Clark said, but not egregiously so.

Then in the latter half of the year, inflation took off and so did wage expectations. By the end of 2021, those same companies were now forecasting a 3.7 per cent increase in their total compensation spend.

"That's an enormous increase, the most I've seen in 20 years," Clark said.

"A change that quick signifies that companies were playing offence instead of defence," to attract and retain workers, he said.

'I deserve more'

In this era of high inflation, workers across the salary spectrum are expecting their pay packets to go up, too, and if they're not, many of them are showing they are willing to leave to get higher pay.

That's what Emilija Pruden did. The 27-year-old from Toronto has worked a variety of jobs while she was studying to become a registered massage therapist, and she said she's noticed a sea change in the way that labour is valued of late.

WATCH | Growing number of employers commit to living wage:

More companies are providing their employees with a living wage, reflecting the cost of living where they live. But some experts say rather than pushing companies to increase wages, the government should provide targeted policies to help people out of poverty. 2:08

Prior to the pandemic, she worked as an administrative assistant at a non-profit for about $20 an hour, but saw her compensation increase as she took on more and more senior roles. By the time she left, she had managed to negotiate working fewer hours every week, but at $28 an hour, so her paycheque didn't go down by nearly as much.

"I've seen huge changes in how people are approaching work," she said.

"The attitude [has] changed from feeling grateful to be employed at all, to feeling like I deserve more for my labour because it's essential."

She left that administrative job when she finished her studies in late 2021. Massage therapists can charge anywhere from $50 to $200 an hour, but because of the physically demanding nature of the work, Pruden has no plans to do it full time, so she supplements her income by working at Lululemon part time. She said she has been pleased by how valued she and her coworkers are made to feel for their labour.

WATCH | Employers 'playing catch-up' on wage gains, economist says: 
Jimmy Jean, chief economist with Desjardins Group, says wage increases are going to be the norm in 2022, because of a growing demand for labour. 0:36

Offering wage incentives

Retail jobs are often associated with minimum wage, which rose to $15 an hour in Ontario in January, but Pruden said she started at $17.25 an hour, with bonuses of up to $7 an hour depending on sales targets. The company offers profit sharing and a generous benefits package, which is why she said she plans on staying at the company even if and when her massage business takes off.

In the current market, she said any employer who fights against minimum wage increases or only mandates raises when they are forced to is going to lose staff "because it makes people feel not valued."

Starbucks recently beefed up its compensation packages to make sure all of its staff are getting paid more than minimum wage. (Micki Cowan/CBC)

Aiden Heese is one former minimum wage worker who has found himself moving quickly up the income ladder. The 26-year-old from Langley, B.C., started working at Starbucks about five years ago, earning what he thinks was the minimum wage in the province at the time, $12.65 an hour.

But he gives the company credit for rapidly upping their compensation game of late. Even before the pandemic, Starbucks started working to increase employee retention, bumping its starting salary up to $1 above whatever the local minimum wage is, followed by increases of about 25 cents per hour every six months. Add it all up, and he's now making about 50 per cent more per hour than he was when he started.

B.C.'s minimum wage is slated to increase to $15.65 an hour later this year but "I'm now making over $18/hr after being there for 4.5 years, which isn't too bad I guess for just being a barista," Heese said.

'Wage price spiral' underway

It's not just those on the low end of the wage scale benefiting. There are higher wages to be had all over the economy. The construction sector is red hot, to the point where companies are finding themselves having to pay new hires the same amount people with 10 years experience used to command. 

Matt Stainton, president of SG Constructors, recently tried to hire half a dozen new workers for a project, but after interviewing 50 people, he only managed to find two qualified candidates.

WATCH | New construction hires earning what it used to take 10 years experience to get:
Matt Stainton, president of SG Constructors, says wages are up by 30 to 40 per cent compared to where they were before the pandemic. But he worries what will happen to all those new hires with not as much experience if and when a downturn comes. (Photo credit: Michael Charles Cole/CBC) 0:33

He said he's paying people 30 to 40 per cent more today than he was for the same job before the pandemic.

"We've heard of supply chain shortages and the same goes on the supply for people," he said.

"We're really struggling with finding talent. It's a real challenge."

That's a recipe for higher wages, at a pace unlike anything that most economists have ever seen.

A "wage-price spiral is underway in Canada," Scotiabank noted in a recent report on the job market, while TD Bank economist James Orlando said in a recent report the "feverish demand" for labour has made it so that "workers have not had this level of bargaining power in decades."

With leverage like that, Pruden's advice for workers with a boss who says they can't afford raises this year is simple: get a new job, because chances are it will pay a lot more.

"If they switch and make an extra $30,000 a year that can be life-changing," she said.

"So why on earth wouldn't they switch? You'd be silly not to."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Pete Evans

Senior Writer, CBCNews.ca

Pete Evans is the senior business writer for CBCNews.ca. Prior to coming to the CBC, his work has appeared in the Globe & Mail, the Financial Post, the Toronto Star, Canadian Business Magazine and — believe it or not — Circuits Assembly Magazine. Twitter: @p_evans Email: pete.evans@cbc.ca Secure PGP: https://secure.cbc.ca/public-key/Pete-Evans-pub.asc

Striking auditor general workers welcome news of impending new offer

Members of the audit services group, who have been without a contract since September 2018, went on strike Nov. 26.

Author of the article: Andrew Duffy
Publishing date:Mar 18, 2022
Striking technical, professional, administrative and other Office of the Auditor General of Canada employees, along with supporters, picketed outside the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat on Friday. 
PHOTO BY ERROL MCGIHON /Postmedia

Striking workers in the Office of the Auditor General, who have been on the picket lines for almost four months, received some welcome news Friday: A new contract offer will be tabled at the end of March

The Office of the Auditor General (OAG) announced Friday morning on Twitter that it had received a revised mandate from the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.

The move empowered the OAG to change its bargaining position and make a new offer to the 165 mostly-female members of the audit services group.

That offer will be presented to negotiators at a bargaining session scheduled for March 29.

“I’m ready for this to be over. I’m just looking forward to going back to work,” Isabelle Champagne-Bell said at a rally of the striking workers Friday outside the offices of the treasury board.

Champagne-Bell has worked at the OAG for 13 years in communications. She said the stress of the strike, combined with the pandemic and truckers’ protest, had been difficult to manage.

“It has been not good — a little demoralizing to be completely honest,” she said.

Members of the audit services group, who have been without a contract since September 2018, went on strike Nov. 26.

It was the first strike in the history of the OAG.

The strike that began in November is the first ever involving Office of the Auditor General staff. 
PHOTO BY ERROL MCGIHON /Postmedia

Last week, Auditor General Karen Hogan said the ongoing strike would delay publication of her next accountability report, possibly for months. The most important federal watchdog, the auditor general examines government programs for efficiency, cost-effectiveness and performance.

According to the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), the key issues in the strike are fair pay and the introduction of a salary grid that establishes escalating pay levels for higher job classifications.

The union says members of the audit services group are the lowest-paid workers at the OAG and one of the only groups in the federal civil service without a pay grid.

Alex Silas, PSAC’s regional executive vice-president for the national capital region, welcomed the government’s decision to table a new offer. “Treasury Board has finally taken notice of this,” he said Friday.

Silas said he hadn’t seen details of the new offer and didn’t understand why the auditor general would wait another 10 days to share them.

“Let’s see the new offer. Let’s get back to the table,” he said, adding: “We’re going to remain firm in our position: We need a wage grid. We need the same economic increase as at other treasury board tables.”

PSAC is seeking a 2.11-per-cent annual wage increased averaged over three years: the same wage settlement reached by other major bargaining groups for the years in question.

Silas said the Omicron wave and the truckers’ occupation made the strike difficult to conduct and forced much of the activity online.

Marie-Eve Tremblay works in professional development at the OAG, designing training courses, and serves as vice-president of the union local. She said the strike had been stressful.

“I never saw this coming and never thought this would happen,” said Tremblay who has been at the OAG for 12 years. “I have a family with three kids, so having to live with this has been frustrating.”

The OAG strike is the longest strike by PSAC members in more than two years.

PSAC’s four major bargaining units, which represent more than 100,000 civil servants, are negotiating with the treasury board on new contracts. The previous ones expired last summer. To confront rising inflation, PSAC wants a 4.5 per cent wage increase in each year of proposed three-year agreements.

 NFLD & LABRADOR

NAPE Holds Rally for Striking Choices for Youth Workers

NAPE Holds Rally for Striking Choices for Youth Workers

NAPE held a rally Thursday afternoon in support of members at Choices for Youth’s The Lilly, who have been on strike since Tuesday.

NAPE President Jerry Earle says workers simply want to be able to return to work under a fair deal. He’s optimistic that a solution can be reached if both sides agree to meet at the negotiation table.

He says this has been one of the toughest rounds of collective bargaining that he has seen, which is surprising considering the fact that Choices for Youth is a non-profit organization. Earle believes recent conversations are a step in the right direction, but there has to be a discussion.

NAPE: “The Gloves Are Off” as Talks With Choices for Youth Hit Snag

NAPE: "The Gloves Are Off" as Talks With Choices for Youth Hit Snag

Talks between NAPE and Choices for Youth have broken off.

The two sides have been trying to reach the first collective agreement for staff at The Lilly.

The nine unionized workers at The Lilly have been on strike since Tuesday.

NAPE President Jerry Earle says talks broke off Friday after a very short session at the table.

Earle says “the gloves are off,” promising to make sure that the limelight is pointed squarely on the organization, and its labour and spending practices.

Choices for Youth, workers return to bargaining table

Workers began strike action Tuesday

Unionized workers at the Lilly supportive housing centre, operated by Choices for Youth, stand on the picket line during a solidarity rally in downtown St. John's Thursday afternoon. (Danny Arsenault/CBC)

Unionized workers at the Lilly supportive housing centre, operated by Choices for Youth, are back at the bargaining table Thursday morning in search of a new collective bargaining agreement.

In an email sent Thursday afternoon, communications manager Katie Keats said Choices for Youth met with the bargaining unit and a conciliator Wednesday, and received a proposal from the union later that day.  She said they're reviewing the proposal.

Nine of the Lilly's employees went on strike Tuesday after voting unanimously in favour of strike action. The group, represented by the Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Public and Private Employees, is working to negotiate its first collective agreement since joining the union two years ago.

In a media release issued by Choices For Youth on Thursday, the group said they hope to end the strike as soon as possible.

"Our focus is on continuing discussions with NAPE until we reach an agreement, while ensuring continued care for young people supported by Choices for Youth," the release said.

Dozens of supporters stood outside the Choices for Youth centre in downtown St. John's on Thursday afternoon in a solidarity rally organized by NAPE. Union president Jerry Earle said they won't rest until a tentative agreement is signed.

"These workers do not want to be here. They don't want to be on the picket line, they would rather be with the youth that's asking for them day after day after day," Earle told spectators.

"It's very easy. Collective bargaining 101. You sit on the other side of the table, you have the tough conversations, you work out the issues, and you respect your workers."

Jessica Wall, right, hugs one of the striking employees of the Lilly following a speech at the rally. (Danny Arsenault/CBC)

The crowd also heard from Jessica Wall, who lived in the Lilly for five years. She emphasized the importance of the staff in the lives of people who live in the centre.

"They're still the first people I call when I'm struggling, the first people I call when I'm doing well, and the first people I call when I have big news," Wall said.

"The Lilly is home to me and to many of my friends, and it will always be our home.… It's not the building that is home. It's not the paint on the walls, the ceilings, the floors, the doors, the windows, the furniture that makes the Lilly home for us. It's the staff. They are home to us. They are home to me. Without the current staff of the Lilly and the staff that have worked at the Lilly, there would be no home."

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

ALBERTA
Feds, province announce $37 million for startups and clean tech businesses

Clean energy and Calgary tech startups are getting a $37-million boost from federal and provincial governments

Author of the article: Josh Aldrich
Publishing date: Mar 17, 2022 •

Minister Responsible for Prairies Economic Development Dan Vandal (middle) is flanked by MP George Chahal (Calgary-Skyview) (left), Platform Calgary president and CEO Terry Rock (right) and Calgary Economic Development president and CEO Brad Parry (back), as he announces $22 million for tech startups and another $2 million for Platform Calgary to help complete their interior development Thursday, March 17, 2022 in Calgary.
 PHOTO BY JOSH ALDRICH /Postmedia

On Thursday, Prairies Economic Development Minister Dan Vandal announced $22 million for 13 local startup businesses to further their development and expansion, and an additional $2 million for Platform Calgary to help complete the development of the interior of its $27-million downtown facility. The funding is expected to create more than 1,000 jobs in southern Alberta.

“The level of innovation and energy and creativity that is here is impressive,” said Vandal. “My role as minister of PrairiesCan is to work with industry, to work with governments to create jobs, to diversify the economy. We know that Alberta and Saskatchewan and Manitoba are energy provinces, and they always will be — we need to work on cleaner, sustainable energy solutions while engaging with the industry and the workers themselves, and the governments.”

The projects include $5 million to Genoptic LED Inc. to establish a manufacturing operation to mass produce advanced hybrid solar panel and battery storage technology; $879,063 for Exergy Solutions Inc. to expand its industrial-scale additive development and 3D printing capacity to support energy and decarbonization technology development; and $415,000 for Canadian UAVs Inc. to expand its market by introducing unmanned aerial vehicle technology and related services to Canada’s energy sector

It’s just a small sampling of what Brad Parry, president and CEO of Calgary Economic Development, says local entrepreneurs have in the pipeline. There are currently about 500 startups in varying stages of development and operation, halfway to the CED’s goal of 1,000.

“What’s really important is that 13 companies didn’t have to leave Calgary to get the funding,” he said. “We need to make sure companies know they can stay here, grow here, build here and scale.”

Many of these startups, and future ventures, will make use of Platform Calgary, a 50,000-square-foot facility slated to open in June. Platform Calgary will act as a launching pad or incubator for startups, connecting entrepreneurs with resources and networking to properly get off the ground. There will be space for 70 partners at any given time, and includes a pitch stage where Thursday’s announcement took place.

The $2 million from Ottawa will help complete the development of the facility’s interior space — an $8-million project — which includes everything from furniture and finishes to proper mechanical and wiring to meet the needs of the users.

“The most important thing is the stories that are going to be here,” said Terry Rock, president and CEO of Platform Calgary. “Something that’s kind of fragmented and diffused right now, it really concentrates it. The level of activity is going to surprise people, there’s a lot of innovation that is happening in our city right now.”

Platform Calgary president and CEO Terry Rock said the federal announcement of $22 million for tech startups and another $2 million for Platform Calgary to help complete their interior development is an important investment in the local business community Thursday, March 17, 2022 in Calgary. 
PHOTO BY JOSH ALDRICH /Postmedia

Also on Thursday, in a separate announcement, Jobs, Economy and Innovation Minister Doug Schweitzer announced $13 million from provincial coffers to support 22 projects through Alberta Innovates. Thirteen projects are receiving $3.4 million through the Digital Innovation in Clean Energy (DICE) program and the remaining $9.6 million will go to nine projects through the Clean Resources business unit.

“We look at all the different opportunities that are emerging right now in the energy space, there’s a collision between the digital world and artificial intelligence, machine learning and augmented intelligence, and the collision between that and the energy industry is immense. There’s a huge amount of opportunities in this space and we’re seeing Alberta companies lead the way.”

The projects cover everything from pushing to net zero to lowering utility costs and for further uses for bitumen.

The funding is expected to help create more than 1,900 jobs in five years.

The provincial funding is being combined with private and federal government dollars for a total of at least $47 million of investment.

jaldrich@postmedia.com

Twitter: @JoshAldrich03
Carbon-Capture Startup Using Dirt Cheap Material Raises $53 Mill help build its first pilot-scale facility


Piles of limestone at a warehouse in Brazil.
Photographer: Dado Galdieri/Bloomberg

By Akshat Rathi
March 17, 2022, 

A California-based startup has found a way to use limestone — a cheap and widely available material — to remove carbon dioxide directly from the air, potentially overcoming a major hurdle in scaling up the technology needed to avoid catastrophic global warming.

Heirloom Carbon Technologies Inc. said Thursday it raised $53 million from investors including Breakthrough Energy Ventures, a clean-technology fund led by Bill Gates, and the Microsoft Climate Innovation Fund.

As a growing number of companies have set goals to reach net-zero emissions in the coming decades, demand has surged for ways to offset their ongoing pollution. However, experts warn that cheap credits based on avoiding deforestation or building renewable energy projects tend to exaggerate their climate benefits. Technologies that actually remove carbon from the atmosphere can more credibly back the promise of capturing and storing a set amount of greenhouse gas.

But those technologies are still nascent and often require complex machinery, making them tens of times more expensive than carbon credits from projects that plant trees of build wind farms, which can cost as little as $3 per ton.

One reason for the high cost is that direct-air capture technology has so far relied on the use of expensive solvents that can separate CO₂ from the air, like iron filings to a magnet. Once the gas is bound to the solvent, it needs to be heated to a high temperature to release the CO₂, which can be captured, compressed and buried deep underground in rock formations similar to those that hold oil and natural gas.

Heirloom uses a similar process, without the expensive solvents. The company starts by heating limestone, also known as calcium carbonate, to more than 600°C in an electric furnace that’s powered by renewable electricity. The most energy-intensive and expensive step. The process releases CO₂ — which is captured — and the leftover calcium oxide is spread out in hundreds of trays that are stacked 20-feet high and exposed to the air.

“It looks like cookies in a baking tray,” said Heirloom Chief Executive Officer Shashank Samala. “We’re trying to simplify as much as possible.”

Peering inside Heirloom’s carbon-capture machine.
Photographer: Fabiano Feijo/Autodesk / Heirloom

Over months or years, calcium oxide gets converted back to limestone as it absorbs CO₂ from the air. But Heirloom says that by turning the material into a fine power and carefully placing the trays to maintain the right conditions, it can shrink the process down to a week. Once calcium carbonate is created, the cycle is repeated 15 times or so before the material isn’t able to effectively capture CO₂.

Samala declined to provide more details on the company’s approach because some of the tweaks it has made to accelerate the capture process are quite simple and yet to be patented. The engineering work “could be easily replicated by others, even with a couple of clues,” said Julio Friedmann, chief scientist at Carbon Direct Capital Management LLC, another fund that contributed to Heirloom’s latest investment round.

Heirloom has so far only tested the different steps in its process individually. The new money will be used to build a pilot plant by next year that will put them all together and attempt to capture a few tons of CO₂ every day. Unlike some other direct-air capture startups, Heirloom does not need to overcome basic science challenges, such as whether the capture process can actually work quickly, said Friedmann. The technology is based on peer-reviewed research published in 2020.

The most advanced direct-air capture companies include Switzerland-based Climeworks AG, which has sold credits to Gates for as much as $600 a ton, and Canada-based Carbon Engineering Ltd., which has been working for a few years with Occidental Petroleum Corp. to build a plant that could capture as much as 1 million tons each year.

Even though Heirloom has yet to build a facility of that size, technology companies Stripe Inc., Shopify Inc., Klarna Bank AB, and Wise Plc have already paid for CO₂ it may capture in the future. Stripe said that it paid more than $2,000 a ton with the understanding that the cost will come down rapidly as the technology is scaled up. Heirloom aims to eventually lower the cost of its captured carbon to as little as $50 a ton.

The Hydrogen Risks For Homeowners & Public Money — CleanTech Talk

Hydrogen diffuses through pipes, explodes more easily and under more conditions, and takes 3 times the energy to ship or pipe.


ByMichael Barnard

In the first half of the podcast, Paul Martin and I talked about the newly formed Hydrogen Science Coalition, of which Paul is a founding member, embrittlement of steel and increased leakage in transmission. In this second half, we delve into more on hydrogen leakage, especially in homes, the problem of increased risks from hydrogen in buildings, shipping boil-off rate, global supply implications, and more.

We start with a discussion of the end-to-end losses of natural gas vs hydrogen across transmission and distribution. In the first half we had discussed the problem with the transmission piping network for natural gas, but the distribution network is a big problem as well. Much modern piping is polyethylene, replacing cast iron pipes which constantly break. While it has advantages, hydrogen diffuses through polyethylene without any cracks at all. That means that we can’t reuse existing piping in many, many cases, a fundamental disconnect on claims of reuse of infrastructure assets by natural gas utilities.

We digressed into hydrogen boil-off in shipping. When you have a gas stored as a liquid by keeping it cold at reasonable temperatures, the cryogenic liquid turns into gas with any heat coming in. With ammonia and LNG, you can run compression and cooling equipment and return it, as they are liquids at much higher temperatures than hydrogen with its 24° Kelvin boiling point. The way to deal with this is to create the biggest, spherical, vacuum-insulated tanks possible, but even so, the boil-off rate is 0.2% per day. Shipping hydrogen tanks ones are likely to be worse because they can’t be as big. At the scale of trucks, the surface area to volume ratio leads to 1% losses per day.

This is true for hydrogen storage tanks at airports, where liquid hydrogen is the only option. Every airport would have to make hydrogen near the airport and have a hydrogen liquification facility at every airport, in Martin’s opinion. This eliminates economies of scale for centralized hydrogen manufacturing and liquification, making it even more expensive as an aviation fuel.

Hydrogen has another pernicious problem, that of spin of the electrons in hydrogen atoms. Basically, they have different spins at different temperatures, and as you cool the hydrogen, it gives off heat due to changes in spin. When the first people made liquid hydrogen at 24° Kelvin, it turned back to gas the next day due to this problem. This means more equipment, energy, and expense.

Liquifying hydrogen takes 3 times the energy as liquifying natural gas, then you lose 0.2% to 1% of the hydrogen per day due to boil-off. Shipping hydrogen would be 5-7 times as expensive as shipping LNG as a result.

And of course, putting it into pipes and moving it requires 3 times the energy to compress and move the hydrogen, so all compressors would have to be replaced.

So there are multiple loss problems along the supply chain, but when we get it into homes, things get even more problematic. We’ve had 100 years of experience making natural gas appliances safe in homes. There are no certified home appliances for hydrogen today, and no jurisdiction has existing building codes that support hydrogen appliances. As I’ve pointed out a few times, building codes and approvals are a patchwork that vary by municipality, not by country. Every city would have to update its building codes and processes to allow hydrogen appliances, a massive regulatory burden.

The next problem is that hydrogen has a much wider explosive range than natural gas. The lower explosive limit of methane is 6% while hydrogen is 4%. The upper explosive limit of hydrogen is 75%, vastly higher than natural gas’ 15%. This means that there is a much broader range of leaked hydrogen that will explode in homes. And hydrogen ignites with a third of the energy of natural gas as well. The odds of an explosion in buildings with hydrogen vs natural gas are much higher.

But wait, there’s more. Natural gas smells not because methane smells, but because we add odorants as a safety feature. The mercaptans we use in natural gas can’t be used with hydrogen because they react to it. While there are odorants that work with hydrogen, they cause fuel cells to fail. That means that two hydrogen distribution networks would be required, one for hydrogen appliances and one for fuel cells, and fuel cells would have to be outside of the home, not inside. The requirements for a hydrogen odorant are very high, and Martin doesn’t think they’ve found one, and that there might not be one.

We shifted into a discussion of engineers being paid a great deal of money to do interesting work to try to figure out the problems with hydrogen, among other things, where the problems and economics make the effort not worth doing. Martin has been one of them in the past, and I’ve dealt with numerous aerospace engineers who wasted a lot of time in airborne wind energy, and many of them pivoted to the electric vertical take-off and landing space, both of which I’ve written about extensively.

Martin’s concern isn’t about engineers wasting their time, but about public money going into these realms. If rich people and venture capitalists want to make very low probability bets, that’s their business. Public money that could be spent earnestly solving the decarbonization problem ends up being spent on the emperor’s new clothes instead. Right now the hydrogen #hopium epidemic are the missing clothes de jour, and they mostly aren’t earnest at all. While there are individuals who actually are earnest about hydrogen as a fuel, the fossil fuel industry isn’t earnest. To paraphrase Michael Liebreich, hydrogen is a no-lose bet for the fossil fuel industry. Either they push hydrogen and it delays decarbonization and hence the fossil fuel industry wins, or the fossil fuel industry gets dragged into the future with tens of billions of public money for blue hydrogen, and they win.

As a case in point, the Suncor-ATCO proposed facility in Edmonton is asking for CAD$1.3 billion from the government to build a blue hydrogen facility for hydrogen to be used in an Edmonton refinery. Alberta’s crude is sour, which is to say it has a lot of sulphur, and hydrogen is used to desulphurize it. As per my projection of hydrogen demand through 2100, high-sulphur crude will be off the market first, and we have to stop refining crude oil into fuels regardless.

Bunker fuels and asphalt for roads and roofing shingles are effectively waste products of refinery, residuum, so with the radical reduction in refining, we’ll have to find replacements for roads and roofs as well, while the shipping industry will have to refuel regardless.

One mystery Martin keeps poking at is the lack of any movement in global bunker fuel markets with the banning of residuum as a shipping fuel that came in in 2020. Martin has customers who expected a glut on the residuum market who were going to take advantage of it to process residuum into allowed products, but the glut never appeared. The assumption is that marine shippers are simply still burning it in international waters, flouting the unenforced rules.

The cost of shipping per ton mile is 40%-60% fuel, even using the cheapest fossil fuels available, slow-sailing to conserve fuel, and treating the atmosphere and oceans as open sewers. Every fuel alternative is going to be more expensive. Of course, 40% of all shipping is oil, gas, and coal, so that’s going away. Another 15% is raw iron ore, and with increased shipping costs, much more local processing of iron ore and other products will be done, so more finished, higher-value products will be shipped instead.

Right now we use cheap energy as a mask for poor organization. Absurd supply chains that jump all over the earth are coming to an end. In a future where fossil CO2 emissions are expensive, recycling of materials will become more prevalent. Steel and aluminum are already among the most recycled materials in the world, and that will simply increase. Electric minimills near to the sources of scrap, powered by renewables, will radically reduce the shipping of steel and its constituents.

Aluminum is easier to decarbonize than steel, so Martin projects that per unit of strength, aluminum will be used a lot more as a structural component. The direct electrolytic process for aluminum running on renewables has been around for 70 years. Some of the steps in aluminum which currently use fossil fuels can be replaced more easily than the blast furnace for steel.

Martin ended with his thoughts for policy makers and those who have their ears. First, it’s as simple as the Drake wince vs approve meme. In the top panel, Drake is wincing and in the bottom, he’s nodding in approval. Hydrogen as a fuel is in the top of the meme, and replacing current black hydrogen use with green hydrogen is the approval in the bottom. Second is no to hydrogen blending, it’s just hydrogen as a fuel. And finally, no to hydrogen as a transportation fuel, because it’s both ineffective and inefficient.

Originally published on CleanTechnica Pro.




AUSTRALIA
Emission Control: Goldman Sachs estimates hydrogen generation could become a
$1tn per year market

Energy
March 18, 2022 | Jessica Cummins

Goldman Sachs says hydrogen generation could become a $1 trillion per year 
market

Queensland Government announces $3,000 rebate for EV purchases under 
$58k

Billionaire backed Sun Cable raises $210mn


Yep, you heard that right.

Green hydrogen, the ultimate de-carbonisation solution, and its market share has the potential to reach US$1tn by 2050, according to Goldman Sachs latest report Carbonomics: The Clean Hydrogen Revolution.

As policy support continues to gain pace around the world, with roughly 30 national hydrogen strategies and roadmaps pledging a >400-fold increase in clean hydrogen installed capacity this decade compared with 2020, the American multinational investment banking firm says policy, affordability and scalability seem to be converging to create “unprecedented momentum for the clean hydrogen economy.”

It says green hydrogen’s total addressable market (TAM) has the potential to double to US$250bn by 2030 and reach US$1tn by 2050, on top of a net zero by 2050 scenario calling for US$5tn of cumulative investments.

These investments would be focused on the direct supply chain of clean hydrogen, it said, specifically the investments required for its production, storage, distribution, transmission, and global trade.
Investments required in the clean hydrogen supply chain for net zero.

“We view these as solely capex investments (not including opex or other costs) in the direct supply chain of clean hydrogen and not including capex associated with end markets (industry, transport, buildings) or upstream capex associated with the power generation plants required for electricity generation for green hydrogen,” Goldman Sach highlighted.

“This corresponds to an annual average of US$55/165 bn per annum required to 2030/50E, respectively.”
Average annual hydrogen investment requirements for net zero by 2050
(US$bn).

Goldman Sachs states four interconnected technologies are emerging as “transformational” in the path to net zero and have a key role to play in the next frontier of clean tech – renewable power, clean hydrogen, battery energy storage, and carbon capture technologies.

The total installed electrolyser capacity for green hydrogen production was only around 0.3 GW by the end of 2020 but the industry is moving at a remarkable pace, Goldman Sach notes, with the current projects pipeline suggesting an installed electrolysis capacity of close to 80 GW by end-2030.

This includes projects currently under construction, having undertaken FID (final investment decision) and pre-FID (feasibility study), and assuming projects meet the guided start-up timeline.

“If we were to consider projects in earlier stages of development (pre-feasibility study stage, ‘concept’ projects), then this figure would go close to 120 GW,” the authors explained.

Under all three of the firms’ global hydrogen demand paths – the bull, base, and bear – global hydrogen demand increases at least 2-fold on the path to net zero.

Queensland supercharges the future of electric vehicles

This week, the Queensland State Government announced a $3,000 subsidy for drivers who choose to switch to an electric vehicle as part of a new package to help reach the state’s goal of net-zero emissions by 2032.

Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk revealed on Wednesday the government will spend $45mn on subsidies for upfront car purchases over the next three years and another $10 mn spent building more charging stations.

The $3,000 subsidy will be available for anyone buying an electric vehicle worth a total of $58,000.

While the move marks a positive step in the right direction, Electric Vehicle Council head of policy Jake Whitehead says Australia needs federal leadership to get the level of support required to drive uptake, attract more EV models into the Australian market, drive down prices through increasing competition, and ultimately align uptake with Net Zero by 2050 while reducing the cost of transport and energy for Australian households and businesses.

“The key barrier is getting more vehicles supplied to our market and as long we don’t have a fuel efficiency standard, or some kind of sales mandate, combined with significant incentives, we are just going to be an afterthought for manufacturers of electric vehicles around the world,” he said.

“At the moment we don’t have the settings to encourage those vehicles to be sent here.”

Aussie EV sales accounted for a 1.95% market share of new vehicles in 2021, up from 0.87% in 2020, and although it demonstrates a clear improvement, it is clear there is still a serious amount of work that needs to be done.

“EV sales need to be over 50% by 2030 to be on a trajectory to net zero – we are at 2% now, we have eight years to get to 50%.

“Even though there has been a vocal voicing of this need to have a fuel efficiency standard, we haven’t seen any policy to introduce a zero-emission sales mandate where we would see more electric vehicles encouraged into the Australian market,” he said.

Location to be a key driver in green hydrogen economics

In January this year, British oil giant BP and the Ministry of Energy and Minerals in Oman signed a strategic framework agreement and Renewables Data Collection Agreement, outlining the potential development of a multiple, gigawatt, world-class renewable energy and green hydrogen facility by 2030.

As part of the agreement, BP will capture and evaluate solar and wind data from 8,000km of land – an area more than five times the size of Greater London – which will be used to approve the future developments of renewable energy hubs at suitable locations within this area to take advantage of these resources.

The renewable energy resources could also supply renewable power for the development of green hydrogen, targeting both domestic and global export markets.

BP’s CEO said at the time the company is not “just investing in energy” but investing in Oman to create and develop infrastructure and support local supply chains needed to users in “this next generation of energy leaders.”

Global energy, renewables, and mining research consultancy group WoodMac says the agreement highlights how location will be critical to green hydrogen project economics.

“With the entire green hydrogen value chain being nascent, getting access to the best location for consistent renewable power has a significant impact on project values,” it said.

“The importance of capturing and analysing the renewables data on a large scale is analogous to geological surveys aimed at identifying technically and commercially visible hydrocarbon reserves.

“The 8000km in the BP/Oman project aims to map the best spots and locations for renewable development.

“Our analysis indicates that Oman’s green hydrogen levelised costs could reach US$2/kg by 2030, which positions Oman very favourably.”

Cannon-Brookes and Twiggy lead Sun Cable raising

Billionaire backed Sun Cable, the proponents of a subsea cable that will transfer Australian solar power 4200km from Darwin to Singapore has completed a $210mn Series B capital raise this week led by Mike Cannon-Brookes’ Grok Ventures and Twiggy Forrest’s Squadron Energy.

Sun Cable says funds will support its +$30bn Australia-Asia PowerLink (AAP) project, which will include a 17-20GW solar array, the world’s biggest battery at a scale of 36-42GWh and the world’s longest subsea cable.

Once fully developed, the project will be seven times the size of the largest solar generation sites of Bhadla Solar Park (2.7 GW) of 160km2 in India and the Golmud Desert Solar Park 2.8 (GWAC) in China and 25 times the size of the largest existing battery storage system of 1.6GWh in Moss Landing, California.

Grok Ventures principal Cannon-Brookes, one of the two bidders rejected by AGL to take over its coal assets, said Sun Cable’s project brings Australia one step closer to realising its renewables exporting potential.

“We can power the world with clean energy and Sun Cable is harnessing that at scale,” he said.

“It’s a blueprint for how we export energy across the world, we fully back this vision.”

Scientists Discover a New, Sustainable Way To Make Hydrogen for Fuel Cells and Fertilizers

Hydrogen Fuel

A new sustainable and practical method for producing hydrogen from water has been discovered by a team of researchers at the RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (CSRS) in Japan led by Ryuhei Nakamura. Unlike current methods, the new method does not require rare metals that are expensive or in short supply. Instead, hydrogen for fuel cells and agricultural fertilizers can now be produced using cobalt and manganese, two fairly common metals. The study was published in Nature Catalysis.

Unlike conventional fossil fuels that generate carbon dioxide upon combustion, hydrogen is a clean fuel that only produces water as a byproduct. If hydrogen can be extracted from water using renewable electricity, the energy grid can be made clean, renewable, and sustainable. Additionally, hydrogen is the key ingredient needed to produce ammonia, which is used in virtually all synthetic fertilizers. But instead of cleanly extracting hydrogen from water, currently, ammonia plants use fossil fuels to produce the hydrogen they need.

So why are we still using fossil fuels? One reason is that the hydrogen extraction process itself—electrolysis—is expensive and not yet sustainable.

“This is primarily due to a lack of good catalysts,” says Nakamura. “In addition to being able to withstand the harsh acidic environment, the catalyst must be very active. If not, the amount of electricity needed for the reaction to produce a given amount of hydrogen soars, and with it, so does the cost.”

Currently, the most active catalysts for water electrolysis are rare metals like platinum and iridium, which creates a dilemma because they are expensive and considered “endangered species” among metals. Switching the whole planet to hydrogen fuel right now would require about 800 years’ worth of iridium production, an amount which might not even exist. On the other hand, abundant metals such as iron and nickel are not active enough and tend to dissolve immediately in the harsh acidic electrolysis environment.

In their search for a better catalyst, the researchers looked at mixed cobalt and manganese oxides. Cobalt oxides can be active for the required reaction, but corrode very quickly in the acidic environment. Manganese oxides are more stable, but are not nearly active enough. By combining them, the researchers hoped to take advantage of their complimentary properties. They also had to consider the high current density needed for practical application outside the laboratory. “For industrial scale hydrogen production, we needed to set our study’s target current density to about 10 to 100 times higher than what has been used in past experiments,” says co-first author Shuang Kong. “The high currents led to a number of problems such as physical decomposition of the catalyst.”

Eventually, the team overcame these issues by trial and error, and discovered an active and stable catalyst by inserting manganese into the spinel lattice of Co3O4, producing the mixed cobalt manganese oxide Co2MnO4.

Testing showed that Co2MnO4 performed very well. Activation levels were close to those for state-of-the art iridium oxides. Additionally, the new catalyst lasted over two months at a current density of 200 milliamperes per square centimeter, which could make it effective for practical use. Compared with other non-rare metal catalysts, which typically last only days or weeks at much lower current densities, the new electrocatalyst could be a game changer.

“We have achieved what has eluded scientists for decades,” says co-first author Ailong Li. “Hydrogen production using a highly active and stable catalyst made from abundant metals. In the long run, we believe that this is a huge step towards creating a sustainable hydrogen economy. Like other renewable technologies such as solar cells and wind power, we expect the cost of green hydrogen technology to plummet in the near future as more advances are made.”

The next step in lab will be to find ways to extend the lifetime of the new catalyst and increase its activity levels even more. “There is always room for improvement,” says Nakamura, “and we continue to strive for a non-rare metal catalyst that matches the performance of current iridium and platinum catalysts.”

Reference: “Enhancing the stability of cobalt spinel oxide towards sustainable oxygen evolution in acid” by Ailong Li, Shuang Kong, Chenxi Guo, Hideshi Ooka, Kiyohiro Adachi, Daisuke Hashizume, Qike Jiang, Hongxian Han, Jianping Xiao and Ryuhei Nakamura, 14 February 2022, Nature Catalysis.
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-021-00732-9





Saturday, March 19, 2022

Geothermal energy as a means to decarbonize the energy mix of megacities

Download PDF
Article
Open Access
Published: 18 March 2022
Carlos A. Vargas,
Luca Caracciolo &
Philip J. Ball
Communications Earth & Environment volume 3, Article number: 66 (2022) 
Cite this article


Abstract


The global number of megacities is projected to increase from 33 to 43 by 2030. Megacities are critical for the world’s economy; however, their resource management is particularly challenging. The increase of energy demand, in parallel to population growth and climate change, requires urgent investment in sustainable energies. We examine the megacities of Bogotá, Los Angeles, and Jakarta and reveal that the potential geothermal resource base is enough to cover the residential electricity demand by 1.14, 4.25, 1.84 times, respectively. Geothermal energy, a clean baseload resource independent from weather conditions, could significantly contribute to energy needs, improved air quality, and the decarbonization of the world’s megacities. We conclude that it is critical that governments and public are educated about the benefits of geothermal. Moreover, those energy policies coupled with investment in research and development are needed to ensure geothermal is successfully integrated into the future energy mix.

Introduction

2007 was the year when, for the first time in human history, the percentage of people living in cities exceeded that of people living in the country1. The increasing population in urban areas determined the escalation of megacities (population of >10 million). There are 33 megacities worldwide, but it is estimated that this number will rise to 43 by 20302 (Fig. 1). Today, >50% of the world’s population lives in urban areas, which is forecast to increase to 68% by 2050. The associated greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) will grow from 70 to 80% of the world’s GHG discharges in 20503.
Fig. 1: Worldwide distribution of geothermal gradient anomalies.



Locations of volcanic belts (red triangles) and hydrocarbons occurrences (white circles correspond to oil fields and yellow pentagons correspond to gas fields) have been combined with distribution of megacities (green stars). The ring of fire is presented as the yellow hatched polygon. Statistics of participation of energy production technologies are shown in the lower panel (left pies), as well as costs of energy production of one kWh (right pies) for Bogotá, Los Angeles, and Jakarta cities (purple squares on the map). Coordinate system in WGS-84.
Full size image

Urban centres account for 67–76% of global final energy consumption, of which an estimated 71–76% is fossil fuel derived4. By 2050 the energy growth for heating and cooling of buildings could increase between 7 and 40% based on 2010 statistics5. The Urban Heat Island (UHI), effects within mega-urban cities6 will magnify the issues associated with global warming7. Importantly, megacities today generate about 20% of the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Megacities worldwide face six common challenges: transportation, electricity, water, waste, sanitation, and security. Therefore, it is clear the importance of megacities, especially in light of environmental challenges and climate change on a global scale. Dealing with these challenges requires careful planning and optimization of economic resources.

Both energy demand and consumption will increase in parallel to population growth making electricity and the decarbonization of heating and cooling needs, and the air quality are some of the most challenging issues to deal with for the future of megacities. Most megacities are distributed in less developed regions, and many of these low GDP regions are experiencing dramatic economic growth (Table 1). It is imperative therefore that sustainability and energy resilience is part of the development strategies for megacities. Despite the technological advancement, the use of sustainable, and greener forms of energy are underdeveloped8. There are comparative assessments of peak and annual electric cooling and heating electricity usage at the city-scale, including OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) and non-OECD member cities9. They propose that OECD cities show a cooling electricity response of 35–90 W/°C/capita above room temperature for cooling. In tropical/subtropical cities outside the OECD suggest that current demand reaches 2–9 W/°C/capita, indicating significant growth in temperature-dependent electricity demand as air conditioning is adopted. A similar situation is observed on the heating process, with subtropical cities adopting electric heaters, increasing electricity generation and delivery concerns.

Table 1 Population, urbanized area, and heating and cooling degree days of world’s largest cities.
Full size table


While renewable energies like wind and solar are considered potential suppliers for megacities and are highly cost-effective sources for electricity, they are also related to some technical problems. For instance, wind turbines can be noisy, occasionally impact the physical environment, are aesthetically an eyesore, and are weather dependent. Solar panels, unless installed on the roof of buildings, require considerable space. Solar panel parks not only require re-purposing of land and potential destruction of forests, but they can also change the surrounding soil’s temperature with consequences in some ecosystems. In contrast, geothermal energy is rarely considered despite several megacities worldwide are located in regions with anomalously high geothermal gradient, especially around the ring of fire, a plate boundary zone with high tectonic and volcanic activity that surrounds the Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1). The benefits geothermal brings over wind and solar are that it is baseload, meaning it is availably 24/day, it is not dependent on any day/night cycles and weather conditions thus, it has a high-capacity factor, bringing stability to the grid, and importantly, it requires a small land footprint10,11. Electricity derived from geothermal developments may be able not only to meet the increase energy requirements of megacities but also contribute to the future energy demands. In addition to the residential sector, there are also other industry applications that can use heat from geothermal circuits, such as agriculture in greenhouses, food preservation, textile industry, etc.

Geothermal energy for power production today can be applied using conventional, high, and low-temperature hydrothermal systems. Moreover, there are several ongoing research programs examining the possibility of supercritical geothermal systems, which significantly increase the power density10,11. Engineered concepts such as Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS), where the rock is fractured to increase the natural permeability extend the geothermal play potential. Furthermore, emerging Advanced (closed-loop) Geothermal Systems (AGS) as they are often called10,11, potentially open the concept of geothermal heat and power to an even wider geographic application. Geothermal energy use, particularly EGS, where fractures are introduced into the subsurface are often sighted as causing induced earthquakes. Studies past and present are designed to mitigate these concerns through detailed pre-drilling research, including stress field analysis and modelling12,13,14, in addition, projects require increased public relationship building and education15,16,17,18.

According to Ourworldindata19, Colombia is a net energy exporter with ~2.5 times its total consumption in 2019 sent outside the country (535 TWh, of which low-carbon sources represent ~68.58%). Recently, USA has become a net exporter of energy, largely due to success in its fracking industry, which supports the domestic delivery of ~100% energy of its consumption (26,291 TWh, of which low-carbon sources represent ~39.95%), and excess to other countries. In contrast, Indonesia has become a marginal importer with ~9.21% of its consumption (2475 TWh, of which low-carbon sources is ~16.95%). The three countries presented as examples in this paper are signatories of the Paris Climate Change Agreement with challenging targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and promise accelerated sustainable and resilient development20,21. The treaty outlines a target reduction of emissions below the 2005 baseline, which means a decrease of 51% for Colombia: 50% for the USA, and 41% for Indonesia. These reductions are mainly based on strategies of energy efficiency, incorporation of renewable energy, waste reduction, increasing fuel efficiency in transportation and logistics, etc.

Energy demand from megacities varies according to the level of development. Indicators used to evaluate the relationship between the energy use by a country and its level of development are controversial22; however, a suitable variable is the energy consumed worldwide to produce the goods and services demanded by that country, i.e., its energy footprint. Thereby, megacities as strategic places where goods are produced or delivered, become intimately related with the level of development of countries that host them. Megacities in Northern America, Europe, and Japan use on average, per capita, more than 60 GJ (16.6 MWh)—and up to 100 GJ (27.7 MWh) e.g., Los Angeles and New York23. In some megacities, new initiatives to improve air-quality through the increased use of electric vehicles may also challenge demand on electrification.

This study was inspired by initiatives, such as the Green Deal Agreement, which highlight the need for climate neutrality by 205024. We investigate the geothermal potential in Bogotá (Colombia) and follow the same workflow with Los Angeles (California) and Jakarta (Indonesia) as case studies. From the geothermal resource potential, we calculate a geothermal resource base (GRB)/energy consumption ratio. This concept could, however, be easily applied to any other megacity in the world. In addition, based on current and future energy statistics, we consider the decarbonization potential of geothermal for the three cities studied. Finally, we argue that the adoption of governmental incentives, regulation and a planned framework for decarbonizing power systems through renewable energy technologies, in particular the use of geothermal energy, could provide an important contribution to the energy demand, decarbonization, and air-quality improvement of megacities today and in the future, improving the quality of life for many people and helping to reduce energy poverty.