Tuesday, April 12, 2022

BOSTON

Workers at grocery store and 

cafe in Jamaica Plain join 

movement to unionize

Three people wearing masks stand in front of a wall lined with posters and a bulletin board.
Althea Berg, 25, Daniel Tracey, 26, and Emery Spooner, 23, at the Worker's World publishing Boston bureau on March 21, 2022. Berg, Tracey, Spooner and a core group of employees announced their plan to form a union at City Feed and Supply in Jamaica Plain on Wednesday, March 30, 2022.
Tori Bedford / GBH News

Updated at 4:55 p.m. March 30

Employees at a high-end grocery store in Jamaica Plain filed a petition Wednesday to form a union, joining a campaign to organize workers at Starbucks outlets and other small coffee shops across Massachusetts.

The unionizing effort at City Feed and Supply, which also offers a cafe and deli, comes on the heels of union campaigns at other local businesses, including eight Pavement Coffeehouse locations throughout Boston, Darwin’s Ltd. in Cambridge, Forge, Diesel and Bloc cafes in Somerville and 11 Starbucks locations around the state.

City Feed workers told GBH News they hope to negotiate for benefits, opportunities for promotions, more power for employees when faced with harassment from customers, and better pay within a more transparent structure. Leaders of the effort say they have collected union authorization cards from a majority of the 40 workers at the store’s two locations and announced their intent to form a union affiliated with the Boston branch of the Industrial Workers of the World. The historic union with socialist ties was founded a century ago, then known as the Wobblies, and currently represents about 9,000 workers across the country.

“Workers at City Feed have long been proud of our commitment to sustainability, ethical food sourcing and local community, and we hope that those values will extend to the longstanding civil rights of workers to unionize and collectively bargain,” workers wrote in a letter delivered to owners David Warner and Kristine Cortese on Wednesday. “We hope that both City Feed and our local JP community will respect its service workers and our legal right to organize at our workplace, and we urge you to pledge not to engage in any union-busting activity.”

Warner did not say whether the company will voluntarily recognize the union effort, telling GBH News in an email that the owners are working on "a better understanding of what all of this means" and will "give it some thought" before making a decision on how to move forward.

Related Stories:

Darwin’s baristas stage brief walkout in Cambridge amid 'stalled' contract negotiations

City Feed opened its first location in 2000 and has long partnered with local groups and nonprofits focused on hunger relief, sustainable farming and food equity in Jamaica Plain and surrounding neighborhoods.

In their letter, employees asked that ownership and management “not interfere with our unionizing effort in any manner, including any attempts at intimidation via one-on-one meetings regarding this organizing drive,” which regional Starbucks union organizers have accused their management of doing. Federal labor laws allow employers to present a case against organizing or joining a union.

Althea Berg, who has worked at City Feed since November 2020, said she was inspired by workers unionizing at Starbucks and Pavement locations. They said a union felt "like the only way to go forward” to address their concerns. Other workers expressed similar feelings.

“There are no, like, benefits really associated with working full time at City Feed, even for people who work there for really long. There's no, like, ‘you’ve been here for six months, you’re eligible for a raise’ kind of thing. There’s nothing like that,” said Hannah Cuthbert, a supervisor who has worked at City Feed since September. “The turnover rate is high, and there’s no real incentive to stay, so most people are young, but there are people with families to support and people who are getting through school — everyone has financial burdens they have to bear.”

Managers are often hired from outside the business, they said, which limits growth opportunities for current staff.

“They don't incentivize you to stay there longer. It's not a place that they make comfortable for people who would want to stay on and dedicate themselves to being there for a while,” Berg said. “At the core of it, we want transparency around wages and room for people to move up if they’re doing well.”

IMG_8209.JPG
Meeting roon and publishing center for the Worker's World Party in Jamaica Plain
Tori Bedford / GBH News












Workers began meeting in small groups to discuss workplace issues, an effort that waxed and waned for the better part of a year.

“The turnover has been so high that at different points we would have a lot of support, but then people would leave,” Berg said. “Then new people come in and it’s like, OK, we’ve got to get this group of people together to sign cards so that it’s actually the percent that we need.”

For the National Labor Relations Board to hold an election, 30% of workers need to sign cards or a petition saying they want a union. As of Wednesday, employees at City Feed say they have the support of at least 60%.

Within the past few months, Emery Spooner, another City Feed worker, said meetings became more regular, held in a small, poster-covered room that serves as the Boston bureau for the left-leaning publication Workers World Party and a community space in the Sam Adams brewery building in Jamaica Plain.

“Eventually, through those conversations, we got more folks involved and we realized that we have the support, the solidarity and the desire to actually change this workplace," Spooner said. "Every worker deserves a union.”

This story was updated to correct the pronouns of two workers.

  • Tori headshot.jpeg
    Tori Bedford  @tori_bedford

    Tori Bedford (she/her/hers) covers the Boston neighborhoods of Dorchester, Roxbury and Mattapan for the GBH News Dorchester Bureau.

 MORE GOOD NEWS FOR WORKERS

Two Starbucks stores in Boston area unanimously secure union wins, the first in Massachusetts

A group of people in "Starbucks Workers United" shirts, sitting crosslegged on the floor, cheer with their arms in the air
Starbucks baristas Kylah Clay, Tyler Daguerre, Ash O'Neill and others celebrate the first union victories at Starbucks locations in Massachusetts, Monday, April 11, 2022.
Tori Bedford / GBH News

Two Starbucks stores in the Boston area won union elections Monday, becoming the first unionized locations in the state.

Joined by union organizers and supporters from around the state, baristas from Starbucks locations in Coolidge Corner and Allston erupted in cheers and embraced one another as election results were announced by an official from the National Labor Relations Board: 14-0 in Brookline and 16-0 in Allston.

The next step for the new union affiliated with Workers United is negotiating contracts with Starbucks management. The baristas are seeking higher wages, more say in everyday operations and higher staffing levels.


Related Stories:

Starbucks employees at two Boston locations move to unionize

“This victory is all of ours collectively — not just our stores, but our community and every worker here and around the world,” Tyler Daguerre, a barista at the Brookline location, told a crowd of around 50 gathered in the basement of the Brookline Booksmith, which has had a union since its origins in the 1960s. “This is a sign that we’re not going to take corporate greed. This is us standing up and fighting back.

Over the last six months, more than 200 Starbucks locations have moved to form unions across the country, including 15 in Massachusetts, out of roughly 9,000 company-owned stores nationwide. Monday’s election marks the 18th and 19th union victories in the country, including one contested election in Kansas.

Starbucks has contested the election process and election results, and has been accused of union-busting tactics by pro-union employees and their representation at the Workers United union. Starbucks has repeatedly denied these accusations.

“From the beginning, we’ve been clear in our belief that we do not want a union between us as partners, and that conviction has not changed,” a Starbucks spokesperson told GBH News in an email. “However, we have also said that we respect the legal process.”

Two people stand at a podium, wearing surgical masks, in front of a modified Starbucks logo with an arm raised in solidarity
Baristas Ash O'Neill and Kylah Clay at a vote counting event in Brookline, Monday, April 11, 2022.
Tori Bedford / GBH News

Last week, U.S. labor officials deemed the firing of seven pro-union employees at a Starbucks location in Memphis to be illegal and threatened to file a legal complaint for unfair labor practices if a settlement is not reached.

At a virtual town hall with employees earlier this week, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz described the sweeping union movement as “companies being assaulted in many ways by the threat of unionization,” describing unions as “an outside organization trying to take our people.” During a Q&A tour at locations across the country, Schultz allegedly asked a barista in California, “If you hate Starbucks so much, why don’t you go somewhere else?”

Maria Suevo, a barista at the Coolidge Corner location, directly addressed Schultz’s comment following the vote Monday.

“I find that so insulting,” Suevo said. “We are a family. I ride for these people. I’d risk my career for these people. Our regulars are beloved to me, and I don’t want to leave that. So no, don’t ever say I hate Starbucks. We don’t hate Starbucks, we are just trying to support one another, uplift each other and build a better future for each other.”

Union merchandise sits on a blue table, reading "Starbucks Workers United"
Starbucks United pins and t-shirts, Monday, April 11, 2022.
Tori Bedford / GBH News

Before taking a job at the Allston location two years ago, Sierra Sorrentino worked at three other Starbucks locations in California, her home state.

“I’ve been working at Starbucks for four years now, and I just love the family that I have there. Every store that I’ve worked at has just been filled with some of the most amazing people that I’ve ever met,” Sorrentino said. “Maybe we don’t necessarily agree or align with what corporate thinks of us, but it’s hard to leave something when you’ve created bonds like that, and I think we’ve all really anchored each other to stay and fight instead of just quitting and giving up.”

Four more stores in Watertown, Cleveland Circle, Lower Allston and Mission Hill are scheduled to hold union elections May 3 under the auspices of the National Labor Relations Board.

  • Tori headshot.jpeg
    Tori Bedford  @tori_bedford

    Tori Bedford (she/her/hers) covers the Boston neighborhoods of Dorchester, Roxbury and Mattapan for the GBH News Dorchester Bureau.



Workers vote to form the first Starbucks store unions in Massachusetts

 BROOKLINE, Mass. —

Votes counted Monday afternoon revealed that Starbucks workers at two Massachusetts stores voted to unionize.

Workers and organizers gathered in Brookline Booksmith in the Coolidge Corner area to watch the vote count and hear the results. The tally was unanimous for forming a union at both the Allston and Brookline stores.


This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

Starbucks Workers United lead the union effort.

This vote follows a series of other unionization efforts in Starbucks stores across the country. According to Starbucks Workers United all stores in Ithaca, N.Y. are now unionized. Stores in Overland Park, Kan., Rochester, N.Y and Buffalo, N.Y. among others have also unionized.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

Howard Shultz recently returned as Starbucks interim CEO. His past comments on unions have not specifically been anti-union but refute the need for a union at Starbucks.

CLASSIC CAPITALIST PATERNALISM

“I was convinced that under my leadership, employees would come to realize that I would listen to their concerns,” he said in the 2012 edition of his biography. “If they had faith in me and my motives, they wouldn’t need a union.”

All 3 Ithaca Starbucks locations vote to unionize

BY LUKE PARSNOW
 ITHACA
PUBLISHED  APR. 08, 2022


All three Starbucks locations in the city of Ithaca voted Friday to unionize, following a movement that started in Buffalo and has since spread to other parts of the country.

Here is the breakdown for vote total for the locations:
College Avenue: 19-1
Ithaca on The Commons: 15-1
South Meadow Street: 13-1

The three businesses employ more than 75 people.

“I’m so proud of what my coworkers have achieved. We couldn’t have done it without each other. Together we will make the future safer and more stable for ourselves and other workers," said Kayli, a partner at the Ithaca Commons location for more than four years.

These stores now make up the 14th, 15th and 16th unionized Starbucks in the country, according to the Starbucks Workers United (SBWU). Workers at a store in Buffalo became the first in the United States to win a union election back in December. The Ithaca locations launched a union campaign in January.

"The partners across Ithaca are incredibly pleased with the results and excited to start bargaining with Starbucks for their first contracts," SBWU said in a press release.

SBWU recently accused the coffee chain of unfair labor practices in a filing submitted to the National Labor Relations Board, alleging the company retaliates against pro-union workers by cutting their hours.
Florida leaders tried to silence Key West voters on cruise ships. But democracy won | Editorial


Gwen Filosa/FLKeysNews.com

the Miami Herald Editorial Board
Sat, April 9, 2022, 

For years, the residents of Key West have struggled to gain some measure of control over the growing number of cruise ships that dock there. Who can blame them? Cruise traffic to America’s southernmost town has grown enormously in the past decade or so, while the island has remained as tiny as it ever was, about seven square miles of lush greenery surrounded by turquoise waters.

Their effort — to preserve the very things that make the island special — has landed little Key West right in the middle of Florida’s larger fight over local control. And though it seemed last year as though the state’s big-footing was gaining the upper hand, Key Westers have just wrested back at least some of their power. Participatory democracy worked. Sadly, that’s no longer a given in this country.

The residents’ wishes have been clear for years. They want to restrict cruise ships to a livable level. In 2013, Key West voters rejected a proposal to allow a study that might have led to expanding the ports for larger ships. In 2020, they approved three citizen initiatives designed to limit cruise ship sizes and the of passengers.
State overreach

Those were entirely reasonable moves, and yet, the following year, the state, under the guise of economic freedom, passed legislation narrowly aimed at Key West’s three measures, essentially nullifying the 2020 vote and preempting home rule. It was an outrageous overreach by Gov. Ron DeSantis and Republican Legislature — and it wasn’t the only one along those lines. By then, though, cruising had stopped because of the pandemic, so the Key West dispute lay dormant.

Now cruises are returning, and so is the conflict over what to do about them. Last month, Key West city commissioners, trying to uphold the will of the voters despite the state’s disregard for the democratic process, voted unanimously to close the city’s two public docks to almost all ships. That approach was left open to them because the commission controls use of the city’s ports. The move was a win for the voters and left only the privately run Pier B for big cruise ships.

Then, commissioners, thankfully, did the right thing again. They turned down a proposal that, on its face, seemed to offer restrictions on cruise ships at Pier B, but actually had the potential to increase both visitors and ship size. In other words, the opposite of what voters want.

There were some aspects to the proposal that didn’t sound half bad. No more than 349 cruises could dock, on average, in a year, and there would be some days when no ships could arrive (New Year’s Day and Thanksgiving Day, for example.) Compared to days when more than one ship pulled into town, that seemed like a win.

But the number of passengers was capped at an average of 3,700 per day, which adds up to almost 1.3 million potential cruise visitors a year. That’s higher than the greatest number of ship passengers the island has ever had visiting — about a million, in the banner year before the pandemic, according to local advocates for restrictions — and it’s vastly more than voters authorized in 2020, when they specified no more than 1,500 passengers arriving per day for a yearly total of about 547,000.
Big ships

And then there was the size of the ships — up to 1,100 feet long, under the proposal. While those are not the biggest ships in the world, they are bigger than the city has ever had before. And bringing them into Pier B also would have required what advocates said amounted to a giveaway of a public asset: 95 feet of submerged land, which Pier B would have needed in order to dock ships of that size. That alone should have been a deal-breaker.

There are other arguments for reducing cruise ships in Key West — notably, environmental ones. Cruise ships, with their deep hulls and giant propellers, churn up silt in the harbor and create turbidity, or cloudiness in the water. Last year, a Florida International University researcher found that water quality had improved while cruising was shut down. That’s common sense, of course.

And despite the dire predictions of those who had opposed any restrictions on ships or passengers coming to Key West, the island’s economy didn’t tank in that time. It flourished.
Uphold democracy

A packed commission meeting on Tuesday night featured hours of comment by residents, with many asking commissioners to uphold not just their 2020 vote, but also democracy itself. They continue to be angry — and we join them — that the governor and the Legislature blithely wiped out their votes with a piece of legislation blatantly meant to help business and thwart voters.

Indignant representatives for the owners of Pier B insisted that the city was getting a good deal. Attorney Bart Smith told commissioners that Pier B had negotiated “in good faith” and made concessions that were “in the favor of the city.” Perhaps. What we know for sure, however, is that companies owned by Mark Walsh, the Delray Beach businessman who owns Pier B Development, gave $995,000 to Friends of Ron DeSantis, the political operated by the governor.

In the end, the proposal was rejected, 5-2.

Without the new agreement, a 1994 contract — which the city, astonishingly, signed in perpetuity with Pier B — remains in effect. It’s true that the contract, as Pier B representatives noted, doesn’t limit the number of ships or passengers. That could backfire on citizens who want to see cruise traffic restricted.

But there’s one more important point that surfaced during this discussion: The current pier, built in 1999, is outside the area that the 1994 agreement authorized, according to a legal memo drafted by lawyers for the Key West Committee for Safer Cleaner Ships, a nonprofit advocacy group. If a legal challenge were to succeed, that never-ending contract with Pier B might have an end after all. Perhaps that will send the company back to the negotiating table.

You could say that the residents of Key West didn’t get a huge win; they just avoided something bad. But there was something much larger at stake: the functioning of democracy. Florida’s leaders tried to silence the voice of the people. Key West commissioners made sure they were heard.

That’s a real — and immeasurable — victory for all of us.

Eon rules out German nuclear power plant extension

Eon has ruled out extending the life of its nuclear power plant in Germany, even as Europe’s largest economy prepares for the rationing of energy supplies and to wean itself off Russian hydrocarbons.

“There is no future for nuclear in Germany, period,” said chief executive Leo Birnbaum. “It is too emotional. There will be no change in legislation and opinion.”

Eon, which is Germany’s biggest energy company, runs one of the three remaining nuclear sites in the country, near Munich. The Isar 2 plant is due to go offline by the end of the year as part of the country’s longstanding phaseout of nuclear power production put in place after the 2011 Fukushima disaster in Japan.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February seemed initially to prompt a rethink in Berlin, with Green economics minister Robert Habeck saying he would not stand in the way on ideological grounds of any decision to keep nuclear power plants running for longer.

But this option was soon ruled out, a decision Birnbaum said Eon was happy to accept. While Isar 2 could “technically” be kept operational beyond this year, “the judgment which was really done is we have a gas emergency situation and the little relief we might be getting on the electricity side is just not really a game changer”, he said.

“There was a really serious discussion with the government,” he added. “They made a decent trade-off decision, which we can understand, and therefore the story for us is over.”

The German government has been rushing to secure alternative energy supplies as part of its long-term goal to reduce its dependence on Russian fuel. Habeck recently signed deals with Qatar for the supply of natural gas and with the UAE for green hydrogen.

Berlin last week activated the first step of an emergency plan that in the event of a gas shortage would eventually lead to gas supplies to large corporations being curtailed.


However Eon, which buys its energy on the wholesale market and does not have direct contracts with Russian providers, has joined German industry in warning against a boycott of Russian gas, which Germany relies on for more than half of its annual consumption.

Such a move would disrupt supply chains and interrupt economic activity “on a scale which I think is significantly more problematic than Covid”, said Birnbaum.

Even if small and medium-sized companies, which make up the bulk of Eon’s corporate customers, were not cut off in such a scenario, the impact on large groups such as chemicals giant BASF would have a “dangerous” effect on the rest of the German economy, he added.

The chief executive also revealed that Eon’s domestic customers were so far not objecting en masse to higher energy prices.

“I believe that there is an acceptance because we have seen now price rises in the market and we have seen little customer reaction,” he said.

“Switching as a result of price increases has been extremely low,” he added. “There is an understanding that it’s an inevitable conclusion that if prices in the wholesale market quadruple or go up tenfold, then prices need to go up. So people understand that.”
JUST DO IT
UK's Sunak considered resigning over tax criticism - Sunday Times



British Chancellor of the Exchequer Sunak presents Spring Statement in London


Sat, April 9, 2022

LONDON (Reuters) - British finance minister Rishi Sunak considered whether he should resign this week after a storm of criticism over his wealthy wife's tax status, the Sunday Times newspaper reported.

"He was considering whether he could withstand his family taking this any more," the newspaper quoted an unidentified source as saying.

A source familiar with the situation told Reuters that Sunak did not consider resigning.

Sunak this week came under the most sustained pressure since he became finance minister in 2020 after his wife, Akshata Murty, confirmed that she had non-domiciled tax status, meaning she did not pay tax on earnings from outside the United Kingdom.

While the status was legal, critics said the arrangement was incompatible with Sunak's decision to raise taxes on workers and employers from April 6 at a time when high inflation is causing a cost-of-living squeeze for many households.

Murty is the daughter one of the founders of Indian IT giant Infosys and owns about 0.9% of the company -- entitling her to a dividend payment worth 11.6 million pounds ($15.12 million) last year.

Sunak said on Friday that questions over his wife's tax arrangements were politically motivated attempts to damage him.

A few hours later, Murty said she would start paying British tax on her foreign income.

The Sunday Times said some people close to Sunak - once considered a potential future prime minister - still thought he might walk away from politics.

Newspapers said Sunak's family had moved out of a government flat in Downing Street, which could add to the speculation about his future, although the reports also said the move had previously been planned to cut the distance to the school of one of his daughters.

The opposition Labour Party on Saturday called on Sunak to respond to claims in another newspaper report that he was listed as a beneficiary of offshore trusts linked to his wife's family business interests.

A spokesperson for Sunak said no one in the families of Murty or Sunak was aware of the alleged trusts.

On Friday, Sunak confirmed media reports that he only gave up a "green card" for the United States -- an immigration status intended for permanent U.S. residents -- after he became Britain's finance minister in 2020.

A spokesperson for Sunak said he had paid his taxes in full and not broken any laws or regulations.

(Writing by William Schomberg; Editing by Frances Kerry and Mike Harrison)
Jared Kushner's firm got $2 billion from Saudi wealth fund run by crown prince, despite board's objections


Peter Weber, Senior editor
Mon, April 11, 2022,

Jared Kushner with Donald Trump and Saudi crown prince 
Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Getty Images

The main Saudi sovereign wealth fund, controlled by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, invested $2 billion in Jared Kushner's new private equity firm six months after Kushner left the White House, where he was a key defender of bin Salman, even though the Saudi fund's investment screening committee expressed serious misgivings, The New York Times reported Sunday night, citing internal documents. Kushner was a senior White House adviser to his father-in-law, former President Donald Trump.

The screening committee's four members — current or former heads of Saudi Aramco, Dow Chemical, the Saudi Central Bank, and Saudi Industrial Development Fund — voted unanimously against investing in Kushner's fledging Affinity Fund, citing the "inexperience" of its management, an asset management fee that "seems excessive," and the fact that due diligence found the firm's operations "unsatisfactory in all aspects," the Times reports. "But days later the full board of the $620 billion Public Investment Fund" overruled the screening panel.

At the same time, the screening committee endorsed the fund's $1 billion investment with former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin's new Liberty Strategic Capital, the Times reports. Mnuchin's fund is "focused on cybersecurity, financial technology, and entertainment — all sectors that fit Saudi priorities" — while Kushner's "has not publicly disclosed a theme or focus." Kushner's fund reported $2.5 billion under management, most of which "appears to be the $2 billion from Saudi Arabia," the Times reports, while Liberty Strategic Capital reports raising $2.7 billion from a total of 33 investors.

The Saudi investment with Kushner, who "has little experience or track record in private equity," is also "on more generous terms" than the smaller investment with Mnuchin, a successful investor before joining the Trump administration, the Times notes.

"Ethics experts say that such a deal creates the appearance of potential payback for Mr. Kushner's actions in the White House — or of a bid for future favor if Mr. Trump seeks and wins another presidential term in 2024," the Times reports. Among other things, "Kushner played a leading role inside the Trump administration defending Crown Prince Mohammed after U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that he had approved the 2018 killing and dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi columnist for The Washington Post and resident of Virginia who had criticized the kingdom's rulers."
Florida visitor from UK wanted to catch a shark. Instead he caught something amazing


Ed Killer, Florida Today
Sun, April 10, 2022, 

When Ian Atherton traveled across the pond from his home in Fleetwood, England to Florida's Space Coast for an April vacation, one of the things he had on his bucket list was to catch a shark. He had always envisioned what it would be like to tangle man-to-fish with one of the ocean's most fearsome apex predators.

How's that saying go about best laid plans?

Atherton was able to catch and release a giant seagoing fish, only it wasn't a shark, but a distant cousin and something much rarer — and some might say cooler — than a shark.


A 13-foot long sawfish was caught and released Aug. 4, 2021 by anglers fishing with Fin and Fly Charters out of Port Canaveral.

What in the world?

Atherton joined Capt. Jon Cangianella of Fin & Fly charters in Cocoa Beach April 9 for a morning half-day to begin with shark fishing, then to try to catch some of the other popular fishing targets in the nearshore waters of the Atlantic Ocean.

Cangianella steered Atherton out from Port Canaveral to a spot in about 35 feet of water a few miles from the inlet. He deployed a chunk of bluefish, an oily fish which draws in sharks from a large distance once the scent of the fish gets into the ocean's currents.

Soon, there was a bite. Right away, line began peeling off the reel — not fast, but steady and strong. Atherton reeled tight to set the hook and began his battle on rod and reel. The tug of war went on for about an hour. As the fish drew close to the boat, Cangianella knew what Atherton had might not be a shark after all.

The rostrum, or saw, came out of the water. It resembles a hedge trimmer and on a large sawfish it can measure up to 4 or 5 feet in length. The fish uses it in the wild by swinging it back and forth through a school of small baitfish. A whack from the saw will stun a small fish allowing the sawfish to pick it up from the bottom since it mouth is located on the underside of the large fish. They also eat crustaceans and other bottom dwelling organisms.

The sawfish is actually very closely related to stingrays, not so much sharks, but is sometimes caught using the same methods. They inhabit Florida waters, but their population numbers in the wild are a mere fraction of what their numbers were before pioneer families 120 years ago began fishing coastal waters with nets.

A 13-foot long sawfish was caught & released April 9, 2022 by a UK angler fishing with Fin & Fly charters in Cocoa Beach.

Let it go


Cangianella freed the sawfish from its hook without removing it from the water, and the sawfish swam off healthy and strong. After the unique encounter, they set out for another spot with different bait where Atherton landed a few king mackerel.

Unfortunately, his dream of catching a shark wasn't completed. However, he could have never imagined he would catch something so rare and mysterious as a sawfish.

Another skipper with Fin & Fly charters, Capt. Parker Miley steered a Wisconsin family to a sawfish catch in the same area in August 2021. Another angler in 2021 encountered a healthy sawfish in the Indian River Lagoon in Brevard County.


A 13-foot long sawfish was caught & released April 9, 2022 by a UK angler fishing with Fin & Fly charters in Cocoa Beach.


Call it a come back


Smalltooth sawfish can grow to about 16 feet long. They are one of five sawfish species worldwide and the only sawfish species found in Florida waters. Historically, the species was found along the U.S. East Coast and throughout the Gulf of Mexico, including the waters of the Indian River Lagoon, Charlotte Harbor and the Everglades.

But sawfish become easily entangled in fishing nets used by commercial fishers seeking other targeted species. Since the early 1900s, sawfish populations have declined dramatically. Sadly, they became the first marine fish species listed as endangered in 2003 under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.

For more information about ongoing sawfish research and recovery efforts in Florida, visit FWC Sawfish and the Sawfish Recovery webpage at sawfishrecovery.org.

To report sawfish sightings, call the Sawfish Hotline: 1-844-4SAWFISH, fill out an online report form at floridamuseum.ufl.edu/sawfish/report-encounter or email sawfish@myfwc.com.

What to do if you catch a sawfish

All sawfish caught in U.S. waters must be released unharmed immediately, or face federal charges.

Keep sawfish in the water at all times.

If it can be done safely, untangle the line if it is wrapped around the saw and remove as much of the line as possible.

Cut the line as close to the hook as possible.

Do not handle the animal or attempt to remove any hooks on the saw unless you have a long-handled de-hooker.

Do not remove the rostrum, or saw.


Florida sawfish encounters 1782-2017


Total: 11,523


Monroe: 5,939


Lee: 2,726


Charlotte: 1,020


Collier: 974


Martin: 177


Palm Beach: 135


Broward: 122


St. Lucie: 71


Miami-Dade: 53


Pinellas: 41


Brevard: 40


Sarasota: 32


Manatee: 27


Indian River: 26


Hillsborough: 25


Volusia: 16


Source: International Sawfish Encounter Database

Ed Killer is florida today's outdoors writer. Friend Ed on Facebook at Ed Killer, follow him on Twitter @tcpalmekiller or email him at ed.killer@tcpalm.com.

This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Shark fishing trip for UK angler yields surprising rare catch