Thursday, May 11, 2023

UCP DECIMATED funding for Alberta's wildfire prevention and response programs

 



#Ableg As “pray for rain” let’s look at what and his UCP MLA’s did to help: 1. The UCP DECIMATED funding for Alberta's wildfire prevention and response programs by $15,000,000, reducing the total budget for the province's wildfire management programs …/2
Image
Quote Tweet
Todd Loewen
@dtloewen
We are a strong Alberta, we will get through this together. Remember to thank a firefighter, first responder, emergency service personnel, RCMP officer, local sheriff and all others who are working tirelessly to keep us safe. Praying for rain!
Show this thread
32
720
#Ableg 2. The budget cuts resulted in the CLOSURE of Alberta's wildfire training center This provided CRITICAL training to wildfire crews and helped ensure Alberta firefighters were equipped with the skills and knowledge they needed to combat wildfires effectively …/3
Image
4
210
#Ableg The UCP’s decision to cut wildfire funding and training programs was WIFELY criticized by experts. ESPECIALLY given Alberta’s history of devastating wildfires. These cuts make it more difficult for Alberta to respond effectively to wildfires, putting communities at risk
Image
5
181
#Ableg 4. So what did the UCP do to respond to this criticism? They gave back a TINY fraction back into wildfire prevention in 2020…before CUTTING Wildfire training and prevention funding AGAIN in 2021 and 2022 They cut 12% and hired 68 fewer firefighters on staff!!! …/5
Image
2
185
AIR QUALITY

Alberta Burns Due To Climate-Change Fueled Wildfires, Yet Provincial Government & Media Refuse To Mention It

My heart is with the Albertans who are displaced by these terrible fires. But my heart is not with the fossil industry of Alberta and its enablers.


DALL·E generated image of a forest made of oil drilling rigs burning, digital art

By Michael Barnard
CLEAN TECHNICA
May 8,2023

At present, roughly 25,000 people have been evacuated from multiple communities in Alberta, Canada. The province just declared a state of emergency. The press is full of stories about the wildfires. The Premier, Danielle Smith, said “I don’t know that I ever recall seeing multiple communities evacuated all at once in fire season.”

What didn’t she say? That the western Canadian droughts that have been fanning wildfire flames for years are caused by climate change. That the mountain pine beetle, which kills pine trees and turns once-thriving pine forests — whether real or replanted — into tinder, has extended its range into northeastern Alberta due to climate change. Or that Alberta’s fire season was longer and more severe due to climate change.

She was willing to say that in her 50-odd years on the planet and in the province, this seems a mite unusual. Why it’s unusual? Couldn’t say. Alberta’s press is full of quotes like that. Words like unprecedented are being thrown around like pancakes at the Stampede, but the words climate change are missing in action.

And, of course, she didn’t mention that Alberta’s oil and gas industry is a major contributor to global warming. Canada’s oil and gas industry, which is dominated by Alberta with 80% of oil and 63% of natural gas, is an outsized contributor, with full lifecycle for all domestic production, domestic consumption and foreign consumption being about a billion tons of CO2 per year. Only 36.8 billion tons of CO2 were emitted globally in 2022, and Alberta’s oil and gas industry is responsible for about 2% of it by itself.

As I noted recently, Canada’s current social price of carbon of $261 per ton of CO2e puts the price tag for negative externalities from our fossil fuels at about C$250 billion a year against C$165 billion in oil and gas industry revenues. That’s a global cost of each ton of carbon, not the cost borne locally, but I suspect the 25,000 people who have been evacuated and fear that their homes will end up like the ones in Fort McMurray in 2016 or Lytton, BC in 2021, are feeling as if they are personally paying the entire price, as are the more than a million people breathing smoke today

But surely this was an oversight by the Premier? Well, no. The only time Smith mentions climate change is when she is attacking the federal government’s policies to address it. I spent some time reading quotes from her in articles this morning, and she never says it’s real, it’s serious, and it’s caused by us, or any variant thereof, but does spend a lot of time attacking Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party of Canada for targeting Canada’s oil and gas sector.

You might remember that Trudeau’s government bought the failing Trans Mountain Pipeline and committed to tripling its capacity to deliver Alberta’s product to water, a project that’s quadrupled its budget from original estimates to C$30.9 billion so far. And you might remember that during COVID-19, Trudeau’s government gave C$18 billion in subsidies, relief, and grants to the oil and gas industry in 2020 alone.

Yes, with enemies like that, who needs friends?

And with enemies like that, it’s remarkable how well Trudeau being Satan incarnate and his administration hating fossil fuels plays in Alberta. Remember, the entire industry’s annual revenue was $165 billion. That $18 billion represents 11% of that number.

Canada’s oil, gas, and coal rents — the percentage of GDP that they contribute — are only 1.7%, and are centered in a province that almost never elects Liberal members of Parliament, yet the Trudeau administration propped them up by 11%. And the province’s Premiere keeps attacking him for alleged sins against the industry. It’s remarkable that Smith can keep a straight face or that anyone in the province thinks this is reasonable rhetoric.

I wonder why that is? After all, the glaringly obvious links between climate change and the wildfire emergency must be getting lots of coverage in local press, right? Well, no.

I searched all four of the biggest papers for the past week for any mention of wildfires and climate change. Those outlets were the Calgary Herald, Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, and Calgary Sun. They all had a lot of coverage on wildfires, typically three stories on their front pages.

But what about wildfire stories that included the phrase climate change? Well, none of the front page stories included it. In fact, I only found two articles from the last week that mentioned climate change and wildfires. One was in the Calgary Herald long reads section about warnings to Calgary’s city council that the future was going to be smokey regularly due to increased wildfires. The other was in the long reads section of each paper, an article written by journalist Bill Kaufman, which included a single person’s perspective that included climate change, Mike Flannigan, research chair for Predictive Services, Emergency Management and Fire Science at Thompson University, and author of the study linked in the second paragraph making it clear that climate change was extending Alberta’s fire season.

What the heck is one article doing in four papers that are otherwise almost entirely ignoring the links between climate change, the province’s major industry, and wildfires? Well, they are all owned by Postmedia, a media conglomerate that owns virtually all the newspapers of any size in Canada except the longstanding national newspaper, the Globe & Mail. And Postmedia is a very conservative, very corporate friendly, very oil and gas friendly corporation.

Postmedia and its publications love to publish climate change denial. Actual information about climate change and its connection to Canada’s oil and gas industry? Not so much. So two articles buried in the long reads section of the four big papers in the last week that mention that climate change has something to do with it is par for the course.

Is it any wonder that large swaths of Alberta’s populace think the federal government hates Alberta and is trying to kill the goose that lays the egg-shaped tarballs? Or that Smith gets off scot-free for not mentioning the linkage between wildfire, climate change, and the provincial industry? Is it any wonder that only 42% of Alberta’s citizens, as of 2019, believed that there was any linkage between climate change and human actions?

Is it any wonder that the one good government Alberta has had in the past 40 years, Rachel Notley’s NDP, the government responsible for shutting down Alberta’s coal electrical generation as part of the only government to have a remotely credible climate plan, scraped into office after an even worse provincial Conservative administration than usual and a divided right-wing, and only lasted one term? Or that Notley and the NDP are only 50% likely to win an election against Smith and the UCP (the latest incarnation of Alberta’s conservatives), despite their climate change silence or outright denial, completely baseless attacks on the federal government, completely farcical constitutional statements about Alberta’s sovereignty, and cozying up to the worst of Alberta’s COVID-19 deniers, including attempts to get charges against the idiots who blockaded the border dropped.

No, it’s not a wonder. What is a wonder is that Albertans are actually Canadians, which usually means good things for basic civic competence and alignment with empirical reality. Alberta has been sucking at the increasingly toxic teat of the US right over the past several years, with our Albertan-heavy COVID ‘protests’ featuring Trump and Confederate flags as prominent features, and only Alberta’s border-crossing blockade involving hidden guns and body armor to enable a thankfully thwarted plot to murder RCMP officers.

My heart is with the Albertans who are displaced by these terrible fires. My heart is with Albertans choking on the smoke that is becoming a dominating feature of western Canadian summers, even on Vancouver Island, 40 kilometers into the Pacific Ocean. My heart is with Alberta’s children, growing up thinking this is somehow remotely normal, and whose current events curriculum includes climate change denial and with climate change swept under the carpet. But my heart is very much not with the oil and gas industry of Alberta, with Alberta’s current Premiere and her UCP cohort, or with Postmedia.
ALBERTA BURNS
Wildfires Rage Across Canada’s Gas Heartland, Shutting Output

Robert Tuttle and Sheela Tobben
Mon, May 8, 2023 



(Bloomberg) -- Wildfires raging across western Canada forced the evacuation of 30,000 residents and cut at least 234,000 barrels a day of oil and gas production as companies shut down wells and pipelines.


A total of 100 blazes were burning Monday afternoon, with about a quarter classified as out of control. The province of Alberta declared a state of emergency, and evacuation orders were issued for communities, including some less than 100 kilometers (62 miles) from the provincial capital of Edmonton.

The fires are striking Canada’s main natural gas production region, including the prolific Montney and Duvernay formations, an area studded with wells and processing plants and crisscrossed by pipelines. The region also is a major center for light-oil production, and the disruptions have sent prices for some local grades of crude surging.

Edmonton Mixed Sweet’s discount to West Texas Intermediate narrowed by more than a third to $2.50 a barrel, the smallest discount since March, and Syncrude Sweet’s premium grew to $3.50 a barrel, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Condensate’s discount narrowed to $3.20 a barrel.

Wildfires are one of the most dramatic signs of climate change, with extreme heat and long-lasting drought creating the perfect conditions for infernos. Large areas of British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan were gripped by drought through March, according to the North American Drought Monitor. Slightly more than 44% of Alberta was experiencing drought, the monitor said on April 22.

One community under evacuation order as of Sunday was Fox Creek, a major center for light-oil and gas drillers. Energy facilities and local residents were also being evacuated in Grande Prairie, provincial officials said.

Alberta oil and gas production has a history of being disrupted by wildfires, including a massive blaze in 2016 that shut down more than 1 million barrels a day of output from the oil sands in the province’s eastern region.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is scheduled to speak with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on Monday about the fire situation.

Below is a summary of updates from companies operating in the area:

Pembina Pipeline Corp. shut down the Saturn I and II gas plants north of Hinton and the Duvernay Complex, west of Fox Creek. The facilities have a combined processing capacity of 443 million cubic feet a day, net to Pembina. Related pump stations, gathering systems and supporting infrastructure are also down. Wapiti Gas Plant, KA Plant, K3 Plant and Peace Pipeline system’s 20-inch line from Fox Creek to Edmonton have resumed operation after being temporarily shut.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has temporarily shut the equivalent of about 39,000 barrels of oil production, including all sites in proximity to wildfires. Oil-sands mining operations have not been affected.

Baytex Energy Corp. has cut 10,000 barrels of daily oil equivalent production, with 70% of the output being crude oil.

NuVista Energy Ltd. shut about 40,000 barrels a day of production after depressurizing operations close to fires.

Whitecap Resources Inc. shut production near wildfires, and the company is assessing the situation’s effect on its second-quarter volumes.

Crescent Point Energy Corp. has shut in 45,000 barrels a day of production in the Kaybob Duvernay region, though the company said it has seen no damage to its assets.

Vermilion Energy Inc. temporarily shut 30,000 barrels a day of production, but added in a statement that initial assessments indicate minimal damage to key infrastructure.

Pipestone Energy Corp. has shut in around 20,000 barrels a day of production, the company said in a statement.

Tourmaline Oil Corp. has closed down nine South and West Deep Basin gas processing facilities as nearby fires expanded and new wildfires rapidly emerged.

Paramount Resources Ltd. has shut the equivalent of about 50,000 barrels a day of oil production as of May 5 as a precaution and because of disruptions to third-party infrastructure, the company said Sunday. Its operations in the Grande Prairie and Kaybob regions are being affected.

TC Energy Corp. halted two compressor stations on its Nova Gas system nearest to active wildfires, the company said in an email Sunday. Other sections of the system and other networks continue to operate safely. The company is keeping workers away from facilities near active blazes unless necessary.

Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure Ltd. shut its Brazeau River Complex, a gas processing facility, west of Edmonton and evacuated all personnel, the company said in an email. Company plans to send people to site Monday to assess damage and initiate the restart plan, which will depend on damage to power grid. The Ram River gas plant that was shut on Friday is expected to resume “shortly” pending regulatory approval.

Cenovus Energy Inc. has shut down some production and halted plants in some areas, a company spokesperson said.

Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. shut in the majority of its Placid operations in response to third-party service interruptions.

The government-owned Trans Mountain Pipeline, the sole link carrying Canadian crude to the Pacific coast, is still in operation but the company has deployed mitigation measures, including a perimeter sprinkler system at its Edson pump station, and is ready to deploy additional protection measures if needed, the company said.

Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. had to shut in less than 300 barrels a day of production after the gas processing plants operated by Tidewater and another run by Keyera Corp. went out of operation due to the blazes, Chief Executive Officer Brian Schmidt said by phone.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. also said it evacuated some workers west of Edmonton.

--With assistance from Verity Ratcliffe, Brian K. Sullivan and Dave Merrill.

Smith refuses to talk about threat to sue CBC days after her deadline passed


Sean Amato
CTV News Edmonton
Updated May 1, 2023 

A spokesperson for the CBC says no lawsuit has been filed against the public broadcaster on behalf of Danielle Smith or the UCP, despite a deadline passing Friday.

The CBC was served with a notice of defamation on April 2, which demanded an apology and retraction by April 28, or "the premier will take such further legal action as may be advised."

The threat surrounded a CBC story headlined "Danielle Smith discussed COVID charges 'almost weekly' with justice officials, according to leaked call."

Smith has said her party would pay for the lawsuit but refused to say anything about the situation during her campaign launch in Calgary Monday morning.

"I think that Albertans are interested in what we're going to be campaigning on to move the province forward and that's what I'll be focused on for the next four weeks," Smith said.

Smith continued to refuse follow-up questions from reporters, a new policy the press gallery has demanded that she drop.

A spokesperson for the UCP also declined to address the lawsuit threat when reached by CTV News Edmonton.

Complete coverage of Alberta Election 2023

The dispute came after the CBC, and other outlets, reported on an 11-minute phone call that Smith had with controversial street pastor Artur Pawlowski, who is facing criminal charges related to a COVID-19 border blockade in Coutts, Alta.

Smith is heard on video offering to make inquiries on Pawlowski's behalf, revealing to him internal government arguments over case direction and telling him that the charges against him are rooted in political bias.

She also said she was reminding prosecutors “almost weekly” about her concerns with pursuing such cases.

The CBC has stood behind its reporting, which Smith has called "misinformation." She has insisted that she only spoke to justice officials and not directly with prosecutors.

Since the notice of defamation, Smith has repeatedly told reporters she can not talk about the case because it's pending legal action.

NDP Leader Rachel Notley said Monday that she believes Smith was caught "dead to rights" on video attempting to interfere in the administration of justice and speculated that she "panicked" before threatening to sue.

"This was always an effort on their part to try to give her an opportunity to skate away from accountability, from her conduct on this matter," Notley told reporters at her campaign launch.

"The fact that they haven't moved ahead, I would suggest, means, yeah, she said exactly the things and did exactly the things that were reported in the media and that we described as a result of seeing her on video saying the things."

Political scientist Duane Bratt said Smith's refusal to address the lawsuit Monday makes it clear that it was a "just a political stunt."

"What it was designed to do was prevent her from talking about the Pawlowski call. But now she can say there's an ethics investigation, so I can't talk about it. I don't expect her to file a suit against the CBC," he said.

Bratt believes the election is a tossup between the UCP and the NDP and said it's close because many voters simply don't trust Smith or believe what she says.

He pointed to statements Smith made for years prior to becoming premier about more private and out-of-pocket health care, which she now says she won't follow through on.

"Why does she need to have a public health guarantee? Does Rachel Notley have to come out and sign a public health guarantee? No, because when she speaks about health care, people believe her," he said.

"If it wasn't an issue, the UCP is winning this election. The fact that it is an issue is why it is a flip-a-coin scenario."

CTV News Edmonton has reached out to Munaf Mohamed, the lawyer who prepared the notice of defamation, for an update on the case.

Albertans will go to the polls on May 29.

With files from The Canadian Press

RELATED STORIES



SMITH DENIES SHE IS THE SAME WOMAN
Danielle Smith apologizes for 2021 video showing her comparing vaccinated to Nazi followers

Multiple groups condemned Smith's comments, including B'nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and the Royal Canadian Legion   OUCH

Author of the article: Jason Herring
Postmedia
Published May 08, 2023 • 
UCP Leader Danielle Smith.

UCP Leader Danielle Smith apologized Monday after a video surfaced in which she compares Albertans vaccinated against COVID-19 with supporters of Nazi Germany.


Appearing on a November 2021 video podcast from Calgary business Integrated Wealth Management, Smith discusses watching the Netflix documentary How to Become a Tyrant, and draws a parallel between the three-quarters of Albertans who had taken the COVID-19 vaccine and supporters of Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich.


“It starts with Hitler in the first episode, and it’s absolutely appalling and shocking how — one academic says, (and) they must have filmed this before COVID — so many people say that they would not have succumbed to the charms of a tyrant, somebody telling them that they have all the answers. And he said, I guarantee you would. And that’s the test here, is we’ve seen it,” Smith said.

“We have 75 per cent of the public who say not only ‘hit me but hit me harder and keep me away from those dirty unvaxxed’.”

Smith adds in the video she chose not to wear a Remembrance Day poppy in protest of pandemic public health measures, saying actions from politicians who impose those measures represent what veterans fought against.

The comments, made by Smith about six months before launching her run for the UCP leadership, began circulating on social media Sunday evening, just more than three weeks from the May 29 Alberta election.

‘No justification’: Smith’s comments condemned


Speaking in Calgary on Monday, NDP Leader Rachel Notley called Smith’s comments “utterly horrifying.”

Notley said the invocation of Nazi Germany in discussing Albertans who rolled up their sleeves for the COVID-19 shot is evidence why Albertans can’t trust Smith’s leadership.

“She’s comparing those Albertans, 75 per cent of them, to the architects of an antisemitic genocide,” Notley said.

“Some comments demonstrate a set of values that no level of apology can ever make up for.”

In a statement, B’nai Brith Canada condemned Smith’s comments.

“There is no justification for politicians to make contemporaneous comparisons to the Nazi regime. Our leaders must do better,” the Jewish human-rights group wrote.

Canadian Anti-Hate Network chair Bernie Farber also took aim at Smith’s comments, saying her claims “minimize and distort the Holocaust.”

The Royal Canadian Legion condemned Smith’s comments, stating that “the poppy is a symbol of remembrance of those who have served Canada and made the supreme sacrifice in the name of democracy,” adding that it has no role in politics.

In a statement Monday afternoon, Smith acknowledged she opposed vaccine mandates during the pandemic, and called it a “divisive and painful period” for many, including herself

“However, the horrors of the Holocaust are without precedent, and no one should make any modern-day comparisons that minimize the experience of the Holocaust and suffering under Hitler, nor the sacrifice of our veterans,” Smith said, going on to call herself a friend to the Jewish community.

“I apologize for any offensive language used regarding this issue made while on talk radio or podcasts during my previous career.

“I would hope we can all move on to talk about issues that currently matter to Albertans and their families.”

When asked about the 2021 comments during a news conference Monday afternoon, Smith directed reporters back to her statement.

UCP candidate previously disqualified over similar social media posts


This isn’t the first time a UCP figure has come under fire for linking the COVID-19 pandemic with Hitler’s Germany.

Last fall, the UCP’s board disqualified Nadine Wellwood as the party’s candidate in Livingstone-Macleod, with Wellwood saying she was removed over party concerns about her social media posts. Those posts included comparing vaccine passports to policies enacted under the Nazi regime.

Notley said Smith’s comments should be similarly disqualifying, but that voters will decide that on election day.


“Albertans are in a period right now where they get a choice, and my call to Albertans is that they should choose to tell Danielle Smith she does not deserve to be premier,” Notley said.

CONSPIRACY THEORY PROMOTER

Premier Danielle Smith says she distrusts World Economic Forum, Alberta to cut ties

‘I find it distasteful when billionaires brag about how much control they have over political leaders’


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith speaks at the United Conservative Party AGM in Edmonton, Saturday, Oct. 22, 2022. Alberta’s new cabinet will be sworn in today at a ceremony at Government House in Edmonton.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Amber Bracken

THIS REPORT IS ONLY SEVEN MONTHS OLD 
AND SHE WAS PREMIER FOR ONE WEEK

THE CANADIAN PRESS
Oct. 25, 2022

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said she is cancelling a health consulting agreement involving the World Economic Forum — an agency at the centre of global domination conspiracy theories — because she won’t work with a group that talks about controlling governments.

“I find it distasteful when billionaires brag about how much control they have over political leaders,” Smith said at a news conference Monday after her new cabinet was sworn in.

“That is offensive … the people who should be directing government are the people who vote for them.

“Quite frankly, until that organization stops bragging about how much control they have over political leaders, I have no interest in being involved with them.”

The United Conservative Party premier said she is in lockstep with federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who has stated he and his caucus will having nothing to do with the World Economic Forum.

The deal with Alberta Health Services sees the province share ideas with health researchers at Harvard University and the Mayo Clinic under the forum’s umbrella.

The high-profile conference of global political and business leaders has been the focus of conspiracy theories from both sides of the political spectrum.

A decade ago, it was accused by the left-wing of conspiring to cut pensions and slash environmental programs.

It became the focus of attacks from the right during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the it promoted a “great reset,” calling for ideas on how to better organize global society post pandemic.

That started online conspiracy accusations, unproven and debunked, that the forum is fronting a global cabal of string-pullers exploiting the pandemic to dismantle capitalism and introduce damaging socialist systems and social control measures, such as forcing people to take vaccines with tracking chips.

Smith, on a livestream interview Friday, announced the deal was ending but didn’t say why. At a news conference Saturday, she declined to respond to two questions on the forum.

The premier was asked by a reporter Monday if she has concerns about the forum “because you accept the online conspiracy theory that WEF is a front for a global cabal of world leaders bent on using the pandemic to destroy capitalism and install a socialist dysfunctional dystopia.”

Smith declined to answer.


“I think it makes sense to make health decisions based on health experts,” she said.

“The group (WEF) … and the person at the helm of it (Klaus Schwab) — I don’t think he’s a medical doctor. I don’t think he’s a nurse, and I don’t think he’s a paramedic and I don’t think he’s a health professional.

“I am going to be taking advice from our front-line nurses, doctors, paramedics and health professionals to fix the local problems that we have.”

NDP health critic Shannon Phillips said in a statement said Danielle Smith’s “bizarre fixation” on the World Economic Forum does nothing to repair health care, create jobs or lower the cost of living for Alberta families.

“It is troubling for Albertans that Smith is more interested in dangerous conspiracy theories than helping families and businesses,” Phillips said.

Political scientist Lori Williams at Calgary’s Mount Royal University questioned why Smith would end “an agreement that has the potential to provide life-saving, health-improving information that could be of benefit for Albertans simply because you’re suspicious about one of the organizations involved?”


“That’s expertise she ought to respect, certainly critically assess to take advantage of, rather than cutting it off because of some vague suspicions about someone trying to control governments.”

Smith, a former journalist and radio talk show host, has espoused contrarian theories on alternative and mainstream media platforms dating back to 2003, when she questioned in a newspaper column whether smoking is indeed bad for your health.


During the COVID-19 pandemic, Smith pushed for later-debunked treatments such as the livestock dewormer ivermectin.

In July, she told a livestream audience she believes it’s within a person’s control to avoid getting early-stage cancer.

Earlier this month, on her first day as premier, she was criticized for saying those not vaccinated against are the most discriminated group she has seen in her lifetime.

Last week, she apologized for remarks made earlier this year that Ukraine accept neutrality in its war with Russia.


—Dean Bennett, The Canadian Press

RELATED: Alberta Premier Danielle Smith apologizes for past comments about invasion of Ukraine

RELATED: “Most discriminated-against group’: Alberta premier pledges to protect unvaccinated


2015 WAS PROVINCIAL ELECTION THE NDP WON
THANKS TO SMITH'S BETRAYL OF WILDROSE PARTY
UCP'S PREDECESOR

Danielle Smith Is Stubbornly Ideological But Just Not That Loyal

Not so long ago, Smith vilified the Progressive  Conservative Party, branding it as tired, washed up, and spiralling out of control. Alberta faced certain disaster if Progressive Conservatives continued their uninterrupted reign. Smith was fervent. Committed. She would burn down the village to save it.

Some may be surprised by Smith's supposed U-turn and decision to abandon her principled and trusted position as leader of the Opposition to join the PC government.

By Brooks DeCillia, Contributor
LSE PhD Candidate, Longtime Journalist
HUFFPOST
Dec 19, 2014 
Updated Feb 18, 2015


The day after Alison Redford's Progressive Conservatives pulled off a somewhat surprising election victory in April 2012, I interviewed the other woman who came close to being Alberta's first elected female premier. It's important to point out that in the wake of this week's supernova implosion of the Wildrose Party, Danielle Smith and her upstart gang of like-minded conservative insurgents nearly ended the PC dynasty.

After what can only be described as a crushing electoral defeat, Smith remained thoughtful during my interview with her, providing some solid insight into the most unconventionally compelling Alberta election in decades.

With the camera off, I said my thanks and congratulated Smith for winning her Highwood seat in the Alberta legislature. I debated whether to thank Smith for running an exciting campaign (not wanting to seem overly enthusiastic or partisan). In the end, I did tell her she should be proud of raising the level of political debate in staid Alberta. Smith was typically gracious and seemed genuinely grateful to hear the compliment.

Without a doubt, Smith impressed me during that election as someone with a sense of ideological purpose. She struck me as logical and principled, albeit somewhat needlessly strident, when she defended the free speech of those who doubted the science of climate change and another who hatefully suggested gays would burn in a "lake of fire."

Nevertheless, I remember thinking the "self-styled disciple of Britain's Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher" knows who she is, what she believes -- and is comfortable in her own skin. In the years after the election, Smith held true to her ideological political compass -- and fought her corner well.

Not so long ago, Smith vilified the Alberta PC party, branding it as tired, washed up, and spiralling out of control. Alberta faced certain disaster if the Tories continued their uninterrupted reign. Smith was fervent. Committed. She would burn down the village to save it.

Fast forward to Smith and her new boss, Jim Prentice, walking down the stairs at Government House this week to announce their "unification."

Prentice, of course, shrewdly outflanked Smith and her party in recent months by adopting many popular Wildrose ideals such as balancing the budget, reviewing controversial property rights laws and health care choice.

So now, Smith lauds what she denounced so vehemently. Her massive flip flop, wrote one commentator, "tests the gag reflex." Many of her supporters feel betrayed and want heads to roll, while others in the media have denounced her move as more "naked ambition" from yet another sketchy politician.

I am not surprised by Smith's political expedience. The savvy politician threw her trusted political mentor -- and supposed friend -- Tom Flanagan under the bus when comments he made about child pornography sparked a media firestorm in 2013.

Flanagan, a longtime professor and former principal aide to Prime Stephen Harper, worked tirelessly -- put his "life on hold for two years" -- to help turn Smith and the Wildrose Party into a competitive force in 2012. Smith outsourced disavowing Flanagan to political staffers. She didn't even pick up the phone to ask her former teacher for his side of the story. But did she abandon her ideology?


Polticial scientists and other academics debate -- continuously -- about ideology and its usefulness for understanding politics. Daniel Bell famously dismissed ideology in his influential book "The End of Ideology" in 1960.

There's no doubt grand debates about ideology do not command the public's attention the way they did in the 1930s, for instance. Along with the decline of big ideas, we've witnessed the rise of the celebrity politician who is increasingly judged not what he or she thinks -- but by their likability. As well, political parties have all also grouped around the centre of the political spectrum, making ideological and policy differences less transparent.

Most important, though, ideology is often presented as something other than ideology. Ideas are stripped of their ideological tone. Neoliberalism, in particular, is frequently presented as natural or common sense. Economic principles are often equated to natural laws akin to gravity. Government services, according to this logic, must be efficient and cost-effective because that's the way the world works.

Smith claims she agreed to the hostile takeover of the Wildrose Party because she and Prentice share "aligned values and principles" -- and (this is where ideology becomes important) she wants to unite the right for the tough economic times to come.

Even Preston Manning -- the doyen of western Canadian conservatism -- blessed the defections by nine Wildrose MLAs.

Political stripes are beside the point, argues Manning. It is time to pull together. Read: opposing the impending big cuts to public spending because of dropping oil prices is not acceptable. Good conservatives must unite to persuade the public to lower their expectations. Prentice and his ideological soulmate Smith -- who will no doubt be propelled to cabinet in the days head -- will soon herald the common sense of linking spending on education and health to oil and gas revenues.

Some may be surprised by Smith's supposed U-turn and decision to abandon her principled and trusted position as leader of the Opposition. Can you imagine Margaret -- "The Lady's Not For Turning" -- Thatcher joining forces with her arch political enemies? Smith's political idol was stubbornly ideological. And so is Smith it turns out.

She's just not all that attached to a particular political party or brand. Baroness Thatcher also spoiled to debate her detractors in hopes of convincing voters of her political philosophy or ideology. The question now is if Smith is as skilled as her political hero at convincing Albertans of her world view.