Saturday, August 31, 2024

Kamala Harris and Fortifying Black-Palestinian Solidarity


 
 August 30, 2024
Facebook

Image by Paulina Milde-Jachowska.

Over the past month, as Kamala Harris’s campaign for the US presidency has gained momentum, hopes she would take a strong stance on the genocide in Gaza have dwindled.

Her candidacy has brought disillusionment among supporters of the Palestinian cause, and with it, growing tensions between anti-genocide activists and Harris supporters.

The tension was reflected in a bitter exchange earlier this month between TikTok creators Maya Abdullah and Tori Grier, which fuelled a debate on social media about racism and disparate community interests. Grier’s supporters argue the Black community should vote for Harris to avoid increased violence and discrimination under another Trump administration. On the other hand, Abdullah’s supporters contend Palestinian Americans should not be pressured to vote for someone who has enabled the genocide of their relatives in Palestine and that allies from other ethnic and religious groups should stand in solidarity with them.

It is unclear to what extent this debate is changing voting attitudes, but if it deepens, it could affect Black-Palestinian anticolonial solidarity at a critical moment in history. This would be a loss for both communities.

History of Black-Palestinian solidarity

The engagement between the Black and Palestinian communities in the United States and beyond has a long history. Its roots lie in the recognition that for Black and brown people, oppression manifests itself in similar ways: as white supremacy, structural racism, Islamophobia and imperialism which subjugate, dispossess and kill.

It is no coincidence that in the US, the Black liberation movement features influential leaders like Malcolm X, Kwame Ture, Huey P Newton, Angela Davis and others who have spoken up about the colonisation and occupation of Palestine. In the 1960s, amid the civil rights struggle, the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Black Panther Party repeatedly emphasised the need for anticolonial alliances to confront white supremacy, Zionism, capitalism and imperialism.

The African anticolonial struggles also repeatedly made parallels with the Palestinian struggle. To this day, the Palestinian cause remains close to the heart of the South African and Algerian nations, who led their own struggles against colonial rule.

In 1969, seven years after it liberated itself from French colonial rule, Algeria hosted the inaugural Pan-African Cultural Festival, positioning itself as a leader of revolutionary struggle. Hundreds of delegates attended the event from 31 independent African nations, including representatives from the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO). The festival was crucial in uniting the struggles of Africa and Palestine into a broader global movement against imperialism.

More recently, over the past decade, the pro-Palestinian movement has supported and directly engaged with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, as it has risen against anti-Black violence, particularly following the murder of George Floyd. For a growing number of Black Americans, the parallels between their own oppression and that of Palestinians living under Israeli apartheid and occupation have become apparent.

After Israel launched its genocidal war on Gaza, key organisations of the Black community called for a ceasefire. Among them are the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the leading civil rights organisation in the US, the Council of Bishops of the African Methodist Episcopal Church and The Martin Luther King Jr Center. In June, the NAACP issued a bold statement, urging the Biden administration to halt weapons shipments to Israel.

Black students and organisations, alongside Palestinian and Jewish anti-Zionist groups, among others, came together in the student anti-genocide movement, demonstrating their shared commitment in the fight against all forms of racism. They rejected Zionism as a white supremacist European project, like other manifest destiny ideologies underpinning Western settler-colonial ventures, including in the US.

A similar alliance drove the Uncommitted Movement, which called for Democrats to vote “uncommitted” in presidential primaries to pressure President Joe Biden into meeting their demands for a ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo on Israel.

Divide and rule

Over the years, the strength of Black-Palestinian solidarity has been increasingly recognised as a threat by Israel and American Zionists. They view intersectional and anti-colonial solidarity as a threat because it challenges and dismantles divisive Zionist propaganda.

In the past, liberal Zionist media and major Zionist lobbies have launched smear campaigns against BLM, accusing the movement of anti-Semitism. After October 7, there has also been a concerted media effort to convince the Black community that Palestinian liberation is “not their battle”.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has consistently targeted Black politicians who have challenged Zionist interests, often through coordinated smear campaigns. A notable example is US Representative Ilhan Omar, who has faced relentless attacks seeking to unseat her and damage her reputation.

This year, AIPAC successfully unseated Representatives Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush, who have been vocal advocates for Gaza and Palestine, by pouring massive amounts of money into their opponents’ campaigns during the Democratic primaries.

In this context, a rift between the Black and Palestinian communities would play into the hands of Israel and its Zionist supporters.

When debating whether to support Harris or not, it is important here to note who she represents. Though she is a woman of colour,  her politics reflect those of the liberal bourgeois class – referred to by Martin Luther King Jr. as “white moderates” – which undermine progressive and anticolonial agendas under the guise of practicality.

Once in office, she may pay lip service to the antiracism struggle, but would do little to challenge racist structures and institutions. She would likely continue to strengthen the military-industrial complex, promoting economic policies that enrich the wealthy and impoverish the poor, and upholding “tough on crime” practices which disproportionately harm people of colour and poor communities.

Some argue that Harris is the “lesser evil” within the American duopoly, given her emphasis on diverse representation and promises of social reform, yet she may emerge as a more “effective evil” – a term coined by the late journalist Glen Ford to describe President Barack Obama’s ability to push through right-wing policies, while assuaging progressive pushback.

The reluctance to feature a Palestinian voice at the Democratic National Convention, along with Harris’s both-sideism narrative in her acceptance speech, reflect Ford’s framework.

Solidarity against genocide

It is important to remember that the forces driving genocidal violence in Gaza are the same ones fueling global oppression. The settler-colonial projects in the US and Israel share core white supremacist ideologies and capitalist-imperial interests, oppressive tactics, aggressive strategies and propaganda techniques.

These powerful networks of colonial and imperial interests, bolstered by the military-industrial complex and surveillance technology, shape US policies including those which enable and dominate Israel-Palestine, from police militarisation to the violent crackdown on immigration and marginalised communities.

For this reason, the genocide in Palestine has far-reaching implications for people of colour and other marginalised groups. Palestine acts as a testing ground for military technologies and the normalisation of extreme violence which can be deployed against oppressed peoples in the Global South and BIPOC in the Global North, who are disproportionately affected by white supremacist, corporate capitalist policies.

A unified Black-Palestinian front is essential to resist these forces and their genocidal aims. Without this solidarity, both communities remain weaker and more isolated in their struggles against their common enemy.

Unity, solidarity and the recognition of a shared struggle against oppression strengthen and drive principled grassroots movements like BLM and Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS).

Dismantling racist capitalist oppression requires an unwavering commitment to revolutionary principles and rejecting alliances with counterrevolutionary forces. True liberation in the US and Palestine can only be achieved through a broad antiracist and anticolonial movement.

This piece first appeared in AlJazeera.

Yoav Litvin is a Doctor of Psychology/ Behavioral Neuroscience. For more info, please visit yoavlitvin.com/about/  


Canary in a Carbon Trap



 
 August 30, 2024
Facebook

Image by Getty Images and Unsplash+.

Although I rarely mention it in print, I have had a very common airway disease since I was very small. Neither the worst nor the most mild version in my case. But bad enough to cause me to miss over 30 days of high school each year as a teenager—and to force me to explain to friends, coworkers, and extended family to this day why I can’t always participate in activities that most other people can. Because I never “outgrew it,” as my pediatrician told my parents I likely would.

Longtime readers will wonder how I did some of the things I managed to do in my past, which I have written about now and again, outdoors in less than ideal circumstances. The answer is that I did most of them when I was much younger and much more willing to take risks with my health. Note: more willing, not always more able. And all I can say is that I was lucky. Yet I generally paid a steep price for such actions. For example, when I get a simple cold, I typically get knocked off my feet and it might take me a couple of weeks to recover when others are on the mend in days from the same virus. Guess what happened when I was in places like Gaza sleeping in an open shed on a freezing January night with such a cold?

Speaking of viruses, like many immuno-compromised people, the COVID pandemic is not over for me. Having the health issues I have (including an exacerbating condition I picked up over the decades) if I get infected with one of the coronavirus variants, as with the less dangerous respiratory disease mentioned above, I can get much sicker than other people do. Even as I push 60. Thus, during spikes in case numbers like the one we’ve been going through this summer, I still wear a mask in public indoor spaces and avoid going out to eat (which has gotten really unaffordable anyway, no?) unless there’s outdoor seating and the day’s weather is favorable.

Which brings me back to our climate crisis. Cold, dry air is bad for me and, to my point, hot, humid air is very bad for me. And I have lived in and around Boston my entire life. With regional weather that treated myself and fellow residents to the “worst of both worlds” in terms of cold and hot (and infamously humid) weather even when I was growing up in the 1960s and 1970s—when we basically had a different, less extreme, climate.

Thanks to the ceaseless burning of carbon (oil, coal, and yes, the natural gas that is falsely claimed to be “clean”) for the last couple of hundred years, the Earth is heating up. Unenforced climate treaties and PR-focused “greenwashing” initiatives by major corporations and national, regional, and local governments around the world have done little to slow that inexorable process down, let alone stop it. As predicted by the environmental movement of which I have been part for over 40 years. Way too much money is being made by doing exactly the wrong things for our warnings to be heeded.

Climate scientists and activists alike have either been ignored or attacked viciously from on high. To the point where many working people with everything to lose have absorbed so much false information from the fire hose of propaganda on climate spewing forth every minute of every day from carbon corporations and conservative political organizations that they are understandably unable to separate fact from fiction on the climate crisis.

Not that climate scientists can currently promise to reverse global warming. They cannot. But most continue to make suggestions about how humanity might be able to at least slow down the heating of our air, land, and sea while researching ways to stop this human-induced crisis before it makes parts of the planet unlivable for people in the not-so-distant future.

As the climate gets worse, more and more people are finding it harder and harder to live comfortably. Those of us with any of the numerous medical conditions affected by rising temperatures around the planet are discovering that we are what I’ll call “canaries in a carbon trap.” We’re stuck trying to survive weather and weather-related disasters that can quite literally kill us. From which people are indeed dying needlessly and dying younger than they otherwise would. Leading people like me to spend more of each year stuck indoors where we hopefully have at least some control over air temperature, humidity, and air quality.

When “heat domes,” like the ones we’re getting more of year by year, settle over regions like New England (or entire nations as we experienced in the lower 48 this summer), people who are unhoused, can’t afford air conditioning, and/or don’t work in air conditioned spaces are dying on the brutally overheated and often extremely humid streets, at their jobs, and in their apartments or houses. Hell, some better-off people are even dying on summer vacation from trying to engage in activities like hiking that were safer even five years ago. Such conditions are persisting for longer and longer periods of time. Leading to the nearly two-week heat wave we experienced around much of the northeast this summer and several other shorter heat waves besides.

People like me can be ok during these periods as long as we can afford to own and run air conditioners. But that assumes that we stay in that air conditioning until the heat wave ends–which many people can’t do. And most adults have to work jobs outside their homes and perform an array of necessary errands—which assumes that they have cars. Yet many people, particularly in major cities, don’t have cars and must use public transportation that generally requires walking to a bus or train stop, waiting for a ride, then walking to wherever they need to go. On streets that often lack tree cover and are covered in asphalt and concrete that absorb solar radiation and intensify temperatures on the ground.

Needless to say, America’s rising homeless and prison populations are suffering the most, generally going without air conditioning for all or most of every day of every heat wave. As are workers (and prisoners) who must labor outdoors with little or no cover and no protection from either heat or merciless humidity (where it is present). As is anyone who can’t afford cars or public transportation or lives in any of the large swathes of the US that don’t have proper public transportation and has to walk from place to place. People in those situations are dying of respiratory failure, heart attacks, and heat stroke more frequently as the world keeps heating up.

But people further up the ever-steeper economic ladder like me are facing danger as well. Because what happens when people absolutely have to go out in extremely hot weather with health issues like the ones I face? And what happens if they can’t drive or don’t own a car? What if they can’t get a car service in a timely fashion because more people are using them during heat waves?

And what happens as global warming gets worse and ever worse and our still-mostly-carbon-based power systems fail—as was the case in the greater Houston area earlier this summer? Because our energy infrastructure wasn’t built to handle the kind of high temperatures we’re getting or because of increased energy usage to power all the air conditioners in service during heat waves or because global-warming-powered storms knock out critical infrastructure or because of problems with the carbon supply chain coupled with carbon industries and allies doing their level best to stop our civilization from switching over to genuinely clean energy alternatives like solar, hydro, and wind?

What happens, as we’ve seen in places like Europe where most people still don’t have air conditioners even when they can afford them, is that vulnerable people like me–particularly older people—die in the streets and in their homes. Because they have nowhere else to go. Even the “cooling centers” that some cities, including Boston, have set up as stopgap measures are not always open 24/7 when temperatures and humidity don’t even drop sufficiently at night for people to cool down. And not all cities offer people rides to such centers either. Nor are all the people who need them physically able to get to them (and may not even know about them). Plus, even cooling centers with generators can be vulnerable during long power outages.

I’m lucky enough to run my own nonprofit organization with my colleagues and so I’m able to stay at home during heat waves. I have no boss to report to and I don’t generally have to be anywhere I don’t want to be during work hours. However, my partners and I don’t make much money in the generally low-paying journalism industry and could easily find ourselves unemployed should there be a downturn in donations to our organization in any given year. What then? And what if I should ever become homeless again? It was hard enough when I was young and the Boston area wasn’t as hot in the summer.

I was thinking a lot about these matters during the big July heat wave this year because I realized that I was one power outage away from becoming very ill or worse. I don’t want to be a “canary,” but I am. And where I go, far too many on our ailing planet have already gone, and so too will all of you who currently consider themselves healthy and comfortably middle or upper class. Canaries were traditionally brought into coal mines for a very particular reason that led me to dream up my metaphor of the moment: if their fragile little bodies were sickened or killed from toxic gas build ups underground, their larger human owners only had minutes or seconds before they were overcome as well.

Just as those canaries told people something about the presence of (usually) carbon monoxide; so, too, do human canaries like me tell people something about the consequences of pumping too much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere for too long. The comparison also holds in another regard: canaries were trapped in their cages in mines while people like me are trapped in our homes during what are ultimately carbon-caused heat waves.

So I write today to encourage you to consider that climate conditions caused by human-driven global warming that threaten the well-being of people with certain medical issues like me, or older people, or homeless people, or prisoners, or anyone without air conditioning, or any of the myriad types of workers in outdoor jobs, will soon be threatening everyone. Over the coming decades, not centuries.

And I recommend that you all think about what everyone can do to improve our climate future that hasn’t already been tried or, I suppose, tried hard enough. Because what’s been done to date hasn’t worked yet … and pretending there’s no problem definitely isn’t working.

This piece first appeared in Horizon Mass.

Jason Pramas is editor-in-chief of HorizonMass and executive director of the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism.


God Wants Me to Save the World: a Glyph


 
 August 30, 2024
Facebook

Ed Sanders is a poet, musician and writer. He founded Fuck You: a Magazine of the Arts, as well as the Fugs. He edits the Woodstock Journal. His books include: The FamilySharon Tate: a Life and the novel Tales of Beatnik Glory.