Wednesday, October 16, 2024

What's Five Eyes staring at India amid Canada stand-off

In the probe into the attack on Hardeep Singh Nijjar and Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, Canada and the US seem to be coordinating their moves. That is because the two are part of Five Eyes, a powerful, close-knit intelligence-sharing grouping. Here's more about Five Eyes and why Justin Trudeau is using it for leverage.


Intelligence officials of Five Eyes made their first joint public appearance in October 2023 in the US on the invitation of FBI Director Christopher Wray. (Image: Federal Bureau of Investigation)


India Today News Desk
New Delhi,
Oct 16, 2024 
Written By: Sushim Mukul

On October 14, the chill in Indo-Canada ties took the shape of a diplomatic stand-off. Justin Trudeau's Canadian government labelled the Indian High Commissioner and other diplomats 'persons of interest' in the murder probe of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. On that day, the US State Department put out a statement, which it withdrew later, related to the probe into the bid on Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's life. Like Nijjar, Pannun is a Khalistani terrorist. The American move seemed to be in coordination with Canada's. And it wasn't the first time. That the US and Canada were waving red flags at India together is linked to the two being part of the powerful Five Eyes grouping.

The Five Eyes is one of the most close-knit espionage alliances in the world, dating back to World War II.

Canada first accused the Indian government of links to Nijjar's killing, and that came after it received intelligence from the Five Eyes network.

And not just that. Caught in conflict with an assertive India, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is dialling leaders of the Five Eyes to shore up support.

On shaky ground since 2023, India-Canada diplomatic relations plunged further on October 14 as India recalled six diplomats, including its high commissioner, and expelled six Canadian diplomats.

As all eyes were on the tit-for-tat diplomacy between India and Canada, the US made a move related to another Khalistani terrorist. The US, investigating a foiled plot to murder Gurpatwant Singh Pannun in New York, said an Indian inquiry committee was set to travel to the country on October 15.

The US was probing allegations that an Indian government official was linked to the foiled assassination attempt on Pannun. However, the statement, posted by the US Department of State on X, was later withdrawn.

Not just that, US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller even alleged that India was not cooperating with Canada on its Nijjar killing probe.

That the US and Canada, two close allies, moved in sync shouldn't come as a surprise as they are part of the Five Eyes alliance and have close cooperation on sharing of all vital information.

And not just the US, even New Zealand -- another Five Eyes member -- backed Canada, albeit with caution.

CANADA SHARED NIJJAR MURDER INTEL WITH FIVE EYES, CONFIRMS TRUDEAU

The Five Eyes, comprising the US, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, is one of the most close-knit intelligence forums in the world, where the member states share a wide range of intel in a coordinated manner to shield their national interests.

That's the Five Eyes, that has appeared amid the Indo-Canada row as the US and Canada investigate attacks on two Khalistani terrorists.

Canadian PM Justin Trudeau revealed that Canada shared all information it had related to the allegations of the involvement of Indian officials in the killing of Nijjar. In 2023, a New York Times report said that the US shared intelligence inputs on Nijjar's killing with Canada.

"From the beginning as of last summer, we have worked closely with our Five Eyes partners, particularly with the US, where they have gone through a similar pattern of behaviour from India in regard to an attempted extrajudicial killing. And we will continue to work with our allies as we stand up together for the rule of law," Trudeau said at the news conference on Monday.

The admission came with Canada's Foreign Minister, Mélanie Joly, revealing the same.

"We will continue to engage with our Five Eyes partners, we will continue to engage with all the G7 partners, and everything is on the table," Mélanie Joly answered when she was asked if Canada would consider imposing sanctions against India.

She also confirmed that she had communicated with her Five Eyes counterparts, which includes the Foreign Ministers of member nations, on the matter.

New Zealand's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters, agreed that the island nation was briefed by Canada on "recent announcements on ongoing criminal investigations into violence and threats of violence against members of its South Asian community".
advertisement

"The alleged criminal conduct outlined publicly by Canadian law enforcement authorities, if proven, would be very concerning," Winston Peters wrote on X on Tuesday.

However, Peters did not mention India in his X post.


WHAT IS THE FIVE EYES INTELLIGENCE GROUPING?

The Five Eyes alliance is a longstanding and highly influential intelligence partnership between five English-speaking countries.

Formed in the aftermath of World War II, the alliance is rooted in the UKUSA Agreement of 1946, a multilateral treaty for cooperation in signals intelligence (SIGINT).

This alliance originated from secret meetings between British and American code-breakers during World War II and was formalised to enhance the war effort. Over the years, it has expanded to include Canada in 1948 and Australia and New Zealand in 1956.

"The alliance is one of the world's most unified multilateral arrangements", says the Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada.

The Five Eyes alliance is known for its comprehensive global surveillance capabilities, monitoring electronic communications, including phone calls, emails, and text messages, through various methods such as intercepting data from satellites, telephone networks, and fibre optic cables, according to Forbes.

The alliance is also said to collaborate with major technology companies to gather user data, said a 2013 report in The Washington Post.


It is ironical that the Five Eyes is being mentioned in India's context as the grouping became increasingly active amid China's muscle-flexing, and the US bid to contain it.


HOW FIVE EYES PLAYED A ROLE IN TRUDEAU'S ALLEGATION AGAINST INDIA

Since Nijjar's murder, the United States has stepped up cooperation with Canada in investigating related plots, including the attempted assassination of Pannun in New York.

As the India-Canada row escalated on October 15, the US again underlined that Trudeau's allegations about the Nijjar killing in Canada are "extremely serious", and 'India needs to take them seriously'.

"We wanted to see the government of India cooperate with Canada in its investigation. Obviously, they have not chosen that path," State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said.

It was the intelligence from the Five Eyes that resulted in Canada publicly accusing the Indian government of the murder of Nijjar, according to a CNN report from 2023.

I'm "confirming that there was shared intelligence among Five Eyes partners that helped lead Canada to make the statements that the prime minister made," US Ambassador to Canada, David Cohen, told CNN, a week after Trudeau's claims, that the Indian government called "absurd and motivated".
advertisement

Canadian Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc on Monday, revealed he briefed US Attorney General Merrick Garland and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on actions being taken by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

"He [Garland] and I discussed the importance of the FBI and the RCMP continuing to share information as these various criminal cases continue," LeBlanc said, while underlining the importance of continued information-sharing between the FBI and the RCMP.

The US's FBI and Canada's RCMP are the participating federal agencies in the Five Eyes forum.

Not just for intelligence-sharing, the Five Eyes also works in providing strategic advantage to its members. Trudeau has been trying to garner support on the Nijjar issue from other members as a pressure tactic against India.

On October 15, Trudeau dialled British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to brief him on the issue.

The five members of the group are all developed nations of the Anglosphere. The US, the UK and Canada, three of the Five Eyes members, are also part of the G7 economic grouping. That's where the sanctions talk comes in too.

Though Canada risks billions of dollars in trade if the conflict with India snowballs, there is the Five Eyes that the Trudeau government would like to leverage as the issue takes a turn for the worse.

India's cooperation with Canada's legal process right next step: UK backs Ottawa

The UK joined its 'Five Eyes' allies in backing Canada's charge against India, saying New Delhi's cooperation with Ottawa's legal process was "the right next step".


British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (L) with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. (Photo: AFP)


India Today World Desk
New Delhi,
 Oct 16, 2024 
Written By: Rishabh Sharma

In Short

Five Eyes alliance supports Canada's claims against India

India asked to cooperate with Canada's legal process

Canada accused India of involvement in Khalistani terrorist's murder


The UK has backed its 'Five Eyes' ally Canada's claims against India's alleged involvement in promoting criminal activities on Canadian soil. In a statement, Britain said India's cooperation with Canada's legal process was "the right next step".

"We are in contact with our Canadian partners about the serious developments outlined in the independent investigations in Canada. The UK has full confidence in Canada’s judicial system," the British government said in a statement.

"The Government of India's cooperation with Canada's legal process is the right next step," it added.

The 'Five Eyes' is an intelligence alliance comprising five countries: the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

This group focuses on monitoring global communications, cyber threats, terrorism, and other security issues, with an emphasis on collecting and exchanging intelligence to protect their mutual interests.

The US, New Zealand, and Australia have already released statements backing Canada's claims against India.

The ongoing diplomatic row between India and Canada escalated on Monday after Ottawa alleged that Indian diplomats were working with the Lawrence Bishnoi gang to target pro-Khalistan elements.

Canada also made Indian High Commissioner Sanjay Verma and other diplomats as 'persons of interest' linked to the murder of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil.

The Ministry of External Affairs released a scathing statement, saying that Canada did not share a "shred of evidence of India's involvement in Nijjar's killing" despite repeated requests and accused Trudeau of doing vote bank politics and not doing enough to tackle separatist elements on Canadian soil.

The row escalated with New Delhi recalling its top envoy to Ottawa and expelling six Canadian diplomats from the country on late Monday evening.

Published By:
Rishabh Sharma
Published On:
Oct 16, 2024



EXPLAINER

Who is Lawrence Bishnoi, the gangster at the centre of India-Canada spat?


Canadian officials this week said Bishnoi’s gang was targeting Sikh dissidents at the behest of the Indian government. It’s a PR coup for India’s most notorious crime boss.

Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi amid heavy police security while coming out of the Amritsar court complex on October 31, 2022 in Amritsar, India [FILE: Sameer Sehgal/Hindustan Times via Getty Images]
By Yashraj Sharma
Published On 16 Oct 202416 Oct 2024


New Delhi, India — India-Canada bilateral relations touched a historic low this week when both countries expelled six diplomats each, in tit-for-tat moves, after Ottawa doubled down on its accusation that the Indian government masterminded the 2023 murder of a prominent Sikh separatist leader.

While levelling serious conspiracy charges against India’s senior-most diplomats in Ottawa, the Canadian officials dropped another bombshell allegation — linking the diplomatic mission with India’s most notorious crime syndicate boss, Lawrence Bishnoi.










Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), which has been investigating the killing of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, blamed the “Bishnoi group” for carrying out hit jobs at the behest of the Indian government’s external spy agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

Bishnoi is currently imprisoned in Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s home state of Gujarat — in the Sabarmati Central Jail in Ahmedabad — ruled by his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

So, who is Lawrence Bishnoi? How does he continue to run his crime syndicate from behind bars? And how does a gangster fit into a serious geopolitical crisis between two democracies with deep historical ties?
From a Punjab village to Mumbai

Bishnoi, 31, first captured national attention when he was linked with the killing of hip-hop icon, Punjabi rapper Sidhu Moose Wala, on May 29, 2022. Moose Wala was also a member of India’s opposition party, Congress. Bishnoi’s associates claimed responsibility for the murder as part of an intergang rivalry.

More recently, Bishnoi’s gang claimed responsibility for the murder of a 66-year-old Muslim politician, Baba Siddique, in Mumbai’s posh Bandra area last weekend.

Siddique was a three-time legislator and former minister in the Maharashtra state government. He was widely known for his closeness with Bollywood celebrities, most notably with actor Salman Khan.

“We do not have any enmity with anyone but whoever helps Salman Khan … keep your accounts in order,” noted a purported Facebook post by an associate of Bishnoi, claiming responsibility for Siddique’s killing.

Bishnoi’s feud with Khan goes back nearly 26 years over the actor’s killing of two antelopes on a recreational hunting trip in Rajasthan while shooting a film in the western state in 1998. The Bishnoi religious sect considers the species sacred.

In April this year, two members of the gang were arrested for firing at Khan’s home in Mumbai.

“For gangsters, it is all in the name — and the fear of that name,” Jupinderjit Singh, author of Who Killed Moosewala?, who has traced gang wars in north India for nearly a decade, told Al Jazeera.

“Lawrence often says, ‘Bada kaam karna hai [I have to do something big]’. Earlier, the ‘big job’ was murdering Moose Wala, then attacking Salman Khan, and now Siddique,” said Singh. “These attacks add brand value to his name and multiply the extortion and ransom amount” the gang can demand.

His alleged collusion with the Indian government to assassinate Sikh separatists in Canada is eventually proven or not, Canadian officials — by naming Bishnoi’s gang — have already delivered a PR victory for them, Singh said,

“Eventually, the winner is Lawrence here. He is getting the name he has yearned for,” the author said.

“People like Lawrence live by the gun — and they die by the gun.”
The ‘I’m something’ syndrome

Born in 1993, near the Pakistan border in India’s Sikh-majority Punjab state, Lawrence Bishnoi was “exceptionally fair, nearly a pinkish complexion, and almost European rather than Indian”, according to his mother, Sunita, a graduate-turned-homemaker, as she told author Singh during their interactions for his research.

Hence, the name, Lawrence — uncommon among the Bishnoi community in north India — which was inspired by British educationist and administrator Henry Lawrence, who was stationed in Punjab during the colonial era.

Bishnoi’s family was well-off and owned more than 100 acres (40 hectares) of farming land in Punjab’s Duttaranwali village. After high school, Bishnoi went to Chandigarh, the state’s capital, to study law.

There, at DAV College, he stepped into student politics and allegedly ventured into the criminal world by locking horns with rival student groups. Bishnoi served as the president of the college’s student body. He was arrested over charges of arson and attempt to murder and sent to a jail in Chandigarh, where he reportedly came under the influence of other imprisoned gangsters.

In Punjab, it is a common phenomenon that the gangsters come from “well-off, good families”, said Singh, the author who has also tracked Bishnoi’s rise since his college days. “All of them suffer from a syndrome: ‘I’m something’,” he added.

However, when they move to cities and face “an elite, intellectual crowd, they realise they are not landlords any more”, says Singh. For many of them, crime becomes an answer to reaffirm their faith in themselves, he adds.

Among his young followers, Bishnoi is highly revered as “a man of principle”, said a senior police officer, requesting anonymity, in Rajasthan, where the Bishnoi gang has recruited members. “He positions himself as this righteous bachelor, a celibate, often signing off with remarks like “Jai Shri Ram (Hail Lord Ram)”, a Hindu right-wing war cry.

Bishnoi has been shuffling between prisons for more than a decade now but has still extended his crime syndicate to the national capital, New Delhi, and neighbouring states, and fought turf wars with rival gangs in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Punjab. He is known to have active associates across Canada and the United States.

“With Siddique’s killing, he is aiming to place himself in Mumbai’s feared underworld now,” the police officer told Al Jazeera.

So, when Singh, the author, woke up to the news of Canada linking Bishnoi to Indian agents, he said, “I really, really wished it is untrue” because of the legitimacy within the crime world Bishnoi may get out of it — “and spill over to a section of youth that is unfortunately looking up to him now”.
How does Bishnoi fit into the India-Canada crisis?

At the heart of the latest allegations levelled by Canada against Indian officials is the claim by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, made on Monday, that Indian diplomats were collecting information about Canadians and passing it on to organised crime gangs to attack Canadians.

The RCMP, separately, made clear in comments to the press that Canadian authorities were referring to the Bishnoi gang when they were speaking of organised crime.

“India has made a monumental mistake,” said Trudeau. “We will never tolerate the involvement of a foreign government threatening and killing Canadian citizens on Canadian soil,” he added, marking an unprecedented escalation of the diplomatic crisis that has been brewing for more than a year now, since he first publicly accused the Indian government of involvement in Nijjar’s assassination.

India has denied the allegations as “preposterous” – and has been challenging Ottawa to share evidence to back the claims.

To Michael Kugelman, director of the Washington, DC-based Wilson Center’s South Asia Institute, it is “remarkable how India-Canada relations have collapsed within a year”. And “the mere fact that an allegation [of the Indian government colluding with criminal gangs] has been put in public, including its senior diplomats’ participation, does not look good on India’s global reputation.”
‘Canada is new Pakistan?’

The issue of Sikh separatism, or the so-called Khalistan movement, has been a thorn in India-Canada relations for decades.

A crackdown on the movement by Indian security agencies in the 1980s also led to serious human rights abuses and extrajudicial killings of civilian Sikhs in Punjab, according to rights groups. Many Sikh families emigrated to Canada, where the community already had a presence.

In 1985, hardliner Sikh rebels blew up an Air India plane flying from Montreal, Canada to Mumbai, India, via London and New Delhi. The midair explosion over the Atlantic Ocean killed all 329 people on board — most of them Canadian citizens.

In recent years, the Khalistan movement — while almost dead in India — has regained some momentum among a few Sikh diaspora communities, including in Canada.

In September last year, less than a day after India’s premier investigation agency named a separatist, Sukhdool Singh, on its wanted list, he was killed in a shootout in Canada’s Winnipeg city. Soon, Bishnoi’s gang claimed responsibility, calling him a “drug addict” and saying he was “punished for his sins”.

But while Canada has now accused Bishnoi of working hand-in-glove with the Indian government in carrying out assassinations on its soil, New Delhi this week “strongly” rejected the allegations and insisted that Canada had not provided any proof “despite many requests from our side”.

“This leaves little doubt that on the pretext of an investigation, there is a deliberate strategy of smearing India for political gains,” the Indian Ministry of External Affairs statement said after Canada listed top Indian diplomats, including its high commissioner, Sanjay Verma, as people of interest in the investigation.

Speaking with Al Jazeera, Ajay Bisaria, a former Indian high commissioner to Canada, said, “With big targets painted on their backs and their security compromised for a while, the diplomats were in any case unable to function.”

Calling it a “needless escalation by Trudeau’s government of an already vexed diplomatic situation”, Bisaria said “such a move is unheard of in modern diplomatic practice. This kind of scenario plays out between hostile powers, not between friendly democracies.”

Harsh Pant, vice president for studies and foreign policy at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank, said Trudeau “seems to have become emblematic of the problem with a lack of trust about him and his intentions” from India’s perspective.

“India and Canada have clearly gone to new lows,” he said, adding, “Canada is now the new Pakistan for New Delhi amid the persistent issues of extremism, Sikh separatism, and radicalisation in Canada.”

Kugelman, of the Wilson Center, said, “India has started to treat Canada like it treats Pakistan at least in terms of blistering diplomatic statements and the accusations that Canada is sponsoring terrorism.”

“Arguably, India’s relations with Canada today are perhaps worse than it has with Pakistan due to the ongoing rapid-fire escalation.”

Source: Al Jazeera


India should take Canada allegations 'seriously,' US says

Having made similar allegations recently, the United States has urged India to respond appropriately to Canada's concerns. Meanwhile, trade between India and Canada appears so far unaffected by the diplomatic spat.


Canada accuses India's government of involvement in the intimidation of Sikh groups in the country and the murder of an independence activis

The United States on Tuesday waded into the diplomatic spat between Canada and India, urging the latter to take the former's allegations of an assassination plot seriously.

"When it comes to the Canadian matter, we have made clear that the allegations are extremely serious and they need to be taken seriously," State Department spokesman Matthew Miller told reporters.

"We wanted to see the government of India cooperate with Canada in its investigation," he added. "Obviously, they have not; they have chosen an alternate path."

India and Canada are key partners of the United States, but both on Monday expelled each other's top diplomats over Canadian allegations that Indian government agents were involved in a violent campaign against Sikh separatists on its soil.

Ottawa has alleged in particular that New Delhi was involved in the assassination last year of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, an India-born advocate for an independent Sikh state who had immigrated to Canada and become a citizen.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said India had made a "fundamental error."


Does the United States share Canada's concerns?

The US desire to see India take the matter "seriously" is rooted in similar allegations made by Washington over a similar, albeit unsuccessful, assassination plot by India on US soil in November 2023.

An Indian "Enquiry Committee" formed in response to the US allegations was visiting Washington on Tuesday to discuss the case, the State Department said.

India "has informed the United States they are continuing their efforts to investigate other linkages of the former government employee and will determine follow up steps, as necessary," the State Department said.

"The fact that they sent an Enquiry Committee here, I think, demonstrates that they are taking this seriously," National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said.


How has Canada-India trade been affected?

Meanwhile, despite the tensions, Canadian and Indian government officials have said that there has been no immediate negative impact on bilateral trade ties.

"I want to reassure our business community that our government remains fully committed to supporting the well-established commercial ties between Canada and India," Canadian trade minister Mary Ng said in a statement late on Monday.

"We will work closely with all Canadian enterprises engaged with India to ensure these important economic connections remain strong."

Canada primarily exports minerals, pulses, potash, industrial chemicals and gemstones to India and while goods such as pharmaceuticals, marine products, electronic equipment, pearls and precious stones go in the other direction.

But an Indian government source told the Reuters news agency: "We are not immediately concerned about trade ties. Our bilateral trade with Canada is not very large."

Bilateral trade between India and Canada amounted to $8.4 billion (€7.7 billion) at the end of the last fiscal year on March 31, according to India's trade ministry, marginally up on the previous year.

India's foreign ministry says more than 600 Canadian companies have a presence in India in sectors including IT, banking, and financial services.

Canadian Sikh leaders accuse India of hiring hitmen

Jagmeet Singh, the leader of Canada’s center-left New Democratic Party (NDP), called the allegations "deeply disturbing" in a video shared by Reuters news agency.

Singh, a Sikh, said that official investigations "painted a picture of a foreign government engaging criminal elements in Canada to perpetrate violence against Canadians."

He called for sanctions against some Indian diplomats in Canada with links to the right-wing Indian paramilitary the RSS.

Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, a Sikh separatist based in Canada and the US, has also allegedly been targeted for assassination by Indian agents. He told DW that he was "not surprised" to be on a "hit list" since "India declared me a terrorist" in 2019. Pannun has maintained that his Khalistan referendum movement seeks a peaceful separation from the Indian state of Punjab, where many Sikhs live.

He accused the Modi government of trying to hire hitmen from within the Sikh community.

mf,es/msh (Reuters, AFP)



Canada top cop urges Sikh community to speak up amid diplomatic row with India

In an interview with Radio-Canada on Tuesday, RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme urged people with knowledge relevant to the investigation they are doing to come forward, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reported




RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme appeal came amid the ongoing India-Canada diplomatic row.



Press Trust of India
Ottawa,
Oct 16, 2024

In Short

Canada cop Mike Duheme urges people with information linked to probe to come forward

He hopes Indian community members trust in Canadian police

Duheme's appeal comes amid ongoing India-Canada diplomatic row


The head of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has urged the Sikh community here to speak out as they continue to investigate allegations linking the Central government to a campaign of violence on Canadian soil.

In an interview with Radio-Canada on Tuesday, RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme urged people with knowledge relevant to the investigation they are doing to come forward, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reported.

On Monday, Duheme publicly alleged that "agents" of the government of India had played a role in "widespread" acts of violence in Canada, including homicides.

Duheme alleged that Indian diplomats and consular officials in Canada have been linked to murders and acts of "extortion, intimidation and coercion" against Canadians and people living in Canada.

He told reporters that the national force felt it had to come forward to disrupt the networks working in Canada, which he said pose a "significant threat to public safety in our country."

"If people come forward, we can help them and I ask them to come forward if they can," he said in the interview with the Radio-Canada.

"People come to Canada to feel safe, and our job as law enforcement is to make sure that they're in an environment that is safe to live."

Asked if members of the Indian community should be concerned for their safety, Duheme said he hopes they "have trust and confidence in the police jurisdiction."

On Tuesday, the RCMP alleged that the Bishnoi gang is connected to the “agents” of the Indian government, which is targeting the South Asian community specifically "pro-Khalistani elements" in the country.

On this, India strongly rejected attempts by Canadian authorities to link Indian agents with criminal gangs in Canada with official sources in New Delhi even saying that Ottawa's assertion that it shared evidence with New Delhi in the Sikh extremist Hardeep Singh Nijjar case was simply not true.

The sources in New Delhi also rejected Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's allegations that India was engaging in activities including carrying out covert operations targeting Canadian nationals in his country.

On Monday, India expelled six Canadian diplomats and announced withdrawing its high commissioner from Canada after dismissing Ottawa's allegations linking the envoy to a probe into the killing of Nijjar.


 

India's alleged interference in Canada was 'horrific mistake,' Justin Trudeau says

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attends a press conference on October 14, 2024, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, after Canada expelled six top Indian diplomats, including the country's ambassador. - India and Canada each expelled the other's ambassador and five other top diplomats, after New Delhi said its envoy had been named among "persons of interest" following the 2023 murder of Canadian citizen Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh separatist leader. (Photo by Dave Chan / AFP)

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attends a press conference on 14 October 2024, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, after Canada expelled six top Indian diplomats, including the country's ambassador. Photo: AFP / DAVE CHAN

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says India made "a horrific mistake" by thinking it could interfere as aggressively as it allegedly did in Canada's sovereignty.

Trudeau made the remark two days after Canada kicked out six Indian diplomats, linking them to the murder of a Sikh separatist leader in Canada and alleging a broader effort to target Indian dissidents in the country.

The Canadian leader's comments were the strongest he has made in a year-long dispute that plunged bilateral relations to a new low.

"The Indian government made a horrific mistake in thinking that they could interfere as aggressively as they did in the safety and sovereignty of Canada," he told an independent probe into foreign interference in Canadian politics.

Trudeau said Ottawa could take further steps to ensure Canadians' security but declined to give details.

India denies the allegations of interference and has expelled six Canadian diplomats in a tit-for-tat move.

- Reuters


Offered ‘off ramps’ to diplomatic crisis, India doubled down, Trudeau testifies

By Stewart Bell & Alex Boutilier 

 Global News
Posted October 16, 2024


WATCH: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed the ongoing diplomatic tensions between Canada and India during the Foreign Interference Inquiry on Wednesday.


India rejected repeated “off ramps” to avoiding a diplomatic crisis after intelligence linked it to the Hardeep Singh Nijjar murder in B.C., Prime Minister Justin Trudeau testified on Wednesday.

Rather than cooperating with the Canada’s investigations into the role of its intelligence services in the assassination, India instead pushed back, Trudeau told the foreign interference inquiry.

“Their response was to double down and attack Canada rather than take responsibility or say, ‘How can we fix this? Yes, this was a violation of the rule of law,’” Trudeau said.

Responding to Trudeau’s testimony, the Indian government said Canada had “presented us no evidence whatsoever in support of the serious allegations that it has chosen to level against India and Indian diplomats.”

“The responsibility for the damage that this cavalier behaviour has caused to India-Canada relations lies with Prime Minister Trudeau alone.”

But appearing at the Hogue Commission two days after the RCMP said India was targeting its opponents in Canada with violence, Trudeau detailed his attempts to resolve the dispute with New Delhi.

He said that while the June 18, 2023, murder of the Surrey, B.C. Sikh temple leader was initially considered a gang or crime killing, indications of India’s involvement emerged over the summer.


4:19
Canada police say agents of Indian government involved in criminal activities on its soil




“In late July, early August, I was briefed on the fact that there was intelligence from Canada and possibly Five Eyes allies that made it fairly clear, credibly clear, that India was involved in this killing,” he said.

Canada first reached out to the Indian officials in August, to inform them of the findings and to try to work together “in a responsible way that doesn’t come and blow up the relationship.”

Trudeau said Canada could have made things “uncomfortable” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi by going public with the allegations before the G20 summit in September 2023 in New Dehli.

“We chose not to,” he said.

“We chose to continue to work behind the scenes to try and get India to cooperate with us,” he said.

But instead of looking into the conduct of its security agencies, India only wanted to know what Canada had on them.

“And at that point, it was primarily intelligence, not hard evidentiary proof. So we said, ‘Well, you know, let’s work together and look into your security services, and maybe we can get that done,”’ Trudeau said, adding the Indian response was, “No, no, no, we’re not doing that.”



2:02 Who is behind India’s alleged crimes in Canada?






At the end of the G20, Trudeau said he spoke directly with Modi.


“I sat down and shared that we knew that they were involved, and explained a real concern around it,” the prime minister said.

“He responded with the usual response from him, which is that we have people who are outspoken against the Indian government living in Canada that he would like to see arrested,” he testified.

“And I tried to explain that freedom of speech and freedom of people who come to our country to be Canadians, to criticize governments overseas, or indeed to criticize the Canadian government, is a fundamental freedom of Canada.”

“But as always, we would work with them on any evidence or any, concerns they have around terrorism or incitement to hate or anything that is patently unacceptable in Canada.”

Upon returning to Ottawa, Trudeau said it was obvious India was continuing its approach of attacking Canada instead of dealing with the issue, and he decided to go public with his allegations about India’s role in late September.


1:24 Trudeau says Five Eyes allies have seen ‘similar pattern’ from India with ‘attempted extrajudicial killing’



On Sept. 18, 2023, with the Canadian press about to report the story, Trudeau told the House of Commons that security agencies had “credible allegations” of the potential involvement of Indian agents in Nijjar’s killing.

“We determined that it was in the interest of public safety in Canada to let people know that we knew about these allegations, that we were following up on them,” Trudeau told the inquiry.

The prime minister said he did so partly “to ensure that nobody in Canada, in any communities, felt like they needed to take action themselves, that they should trust Canadian institutions to take this threat seriously and follow up on it.”

The Indian government again responded to the statement with attacks and denials, instead of cooperation, he said. India also ejected dozens of Canadian diplomats in an act of reprisal, as if to say, “‘We don’t like what you said in the House about us, and we’re going to punish you for that,” according to Trudeau.


“This was a situation in which we had clear, and certainly now even clearer, indications that India had violated Canada’s sovereignty, and their response was to double down and attack Canada further.”

He said Canada did not want to pick a fight with India, an important trade partner, but he had to stand up for Canadian security and sovereignty.

Last weekend weekend, Canadian officials made another effort to secure India’s cooperation, asking it to lift immunity on six diplomats the RCMP had identified as “persons of interest” in investigations.

India declined and launched a broadside early Monday, accusing Trudeau of playing politics. Later that day, the RCMP announced it had uncovered evidence of India’s involvement in a wave of violent crime.

Agents based at India’s high commission in Ottawa and consulates in Vancouver and Toronto had been denying visas to Canadians who needed to travel to India in order to coerce them into spying, sources said.

Cash payments were also used to recruit informants. The information they gathered was relayed back to India’s intelligence services, who used it to plan attacks on Modi’s opponents.



1:49 Indian government linked to violent attacks in Canada

Indian intelligence contracted organized crime groups such as the Lawrence Bishnoi gang to carry out the attacks in Canada, which targeted mostly activists in the Khalistan movement that champions independence for the Sikh-majority Punjab.

Global News reported Tuesday police have evidence the operation was approved by Modi’s right hand man, Amit Shah, the hardline Hindu nationalist who serves as India’s Home Minister.

Asked if he agreed the violence in Canada was a policy that was “authorized and directed by responsible members of the government of India,” Trudeau said that was “an extremely important question.”

“And that is a question that actually we have been repeatedly asking the government of India to assist us on, and to get to the bottom of, the question of whether it is or could be, rogue elements within the government or whether it was a more, systemic, systematic, endeavour, for the government of India.”

Canadian investigators were “somewhat removed from being able to uncover the internal machinations of the Indian government, of who went wrong or who did this or who did that,” he said.

“That’s why from the very beginning, we have been asking for India, the Indian government to take, these allegations seriously and proceed with their own investigations and work with us on, figuring out exactly how these egregious violations of Canadian sovereignty, actually happened.”

Stewart.Bell@globalnews.ca



Trudeau accuses India of 'massive mistake' amid diplomatic row

Nadine Yousif
BBC News, Toronto
AFP via Getty Images

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has accused India of making a "massive mistake" that Canada could not ignore if Delhi was behind the death of a Sikh separatist leader last year on Canadian soil.

Trudeau made the comments two days after Canadian officials accused India of being involved in homicides, extortions and other violent acts targeting Indian dissidents on Canadian soil.

After Canada levelled the accusations on Monday, both countries expelled top envoys and diplomats, ramping up already strained tensions.

India has rejected the allegations as “preposterous”, and accused Trudeau of pandering to Canada’s large Sikh community for political gain.

In his remarks on Wednesday before a public inquiry looking into foreign interference in Canadian politics, the prime minister criticised India's response to the investigation into Hardeep Singh Nijjar's killing in June 2023.

According to Trudeau, he was briefed on the murder later that summer and received intelligence that made it "incredibly clear" that India was involved in the killing.

He said Canada had to take any alleged violation of its sovereignty and the international rule of law seriously.

Mr Nijjar was shot and killed in Surrey, British Columbia. He had been a vocal supporter of the Khalistan movement, which demands a separate Sikh homeland, and publicly campaigned for it.

At the time, however, Canada's intelligence did not amount to hard evidence or proof, Trudeau told the inquiry.

Police have since charged four Indian nationals over the Mr Nijjar's death.

Trudeau said he had hoped to handle the matter “in a responsible way" that didn't "blow up" the bilateral relationship with a significant trade partner, but that Indian officials rebuffed Canada's requests for assistance into the probe.

"It was clear that the Indian government's approach was to criticise us and the integrity of our democracy," he said.

Shortly after he made the allegations public, saying in that September that Canada had "credible allegations" linking Indian government agents to the murder.

The prime minister also added on Wednesday more detail to further allegations released this week by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

The police force took the rare step of publicly disclosing information about multiple ongoing investigations “due to significant threat to public safety” in Canada.

RCMP said on Monday there had been “over a dozen credible and imminent threats to life” which “specifically” focused on members of the pro-Khalistan movement.

Subsequent investigations had led to police uncovering alleged criminal activity orchestrated by government of India agents, according to the RCMP.

Trudeau said the force made the announcement with “a goal of disrupting the chain of activities that was resulting in drive-by shootings, home invasions, violent extortion and even murder" in the South Asian community across Canada.

India has vehemently denied all allegations and maintained that Canada has provided no evidence to support its claims.

The RCMP and national security advisers travelled to Singapore last weekend to meet with Indian officials - a meeting the RCMP said was not fruitful.

Following Monday's allegations from Canadian officials, the UK and US urged India to co-operate with Canada's legal process.

On Wednesday, the British Foreign Office said in a statement that it is in contact with Ottawa "about the serious developments outlined in the independent investigations in Canada".

The UK has full confidence in Canada’s judicial system,” the statement added.

"The Government of India's cooperation with Canada's legal process is the right next step."

The US, another close Canadian ally, said that India was not co-operating with Canadian authorities as the White House had hoped it would.

“We have made clear that the allegations are extremely serious and they need to be taken seriously and we want to see the government of India co-operate with Canada in its investigation," said spokesperson Matthew Miller at a US State Department briefing on Tuesday.

"Obviously, they have not chosen that path.”

Canada's foreign minister, Melanie Joly, has said that Ottawa is in close contact with the Five Eyes intelligence alliance - comprising the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand - on the matter.
Fact check: Did Black wages in the US rise ‘massively’ under Donald Trump?

They did rise, but they have risen even faster under Joe Biden. And the US wage gap for Black and white men grew under Donald Trump.

Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump speaks on a panel of the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) convention as Rachel Scott, senior congressional correspondent for ABC News, looks away, on July 31, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois, the United States 
[File: Vincent Alban/Reuters]

By Louis Jacobson | Politifact
Published On 16 Oct 2024


In recent days, US Democrats have fretted about polls showing soft support for Vice President Kamala Harris among Black voters, and especially among Black men — a development that some Democrats fear could imperil Harris’s chances to win in November.

On October 14, Harris released an “Opportunity Agenda for Black Men” that her campaign hoped would win more support.

US Congressman Byron Donalds, an ally of former President Donald Trump, said there’s a reason members of this core Democratic group should vote for Trump instead.

“The big stat — and this happened during the first Trump administration, nobody likes to talk about it: Wages adjusted for inflation were massively up under Donald Trump for Black men, for Black families, [and] for all Americans,” Donalds said on October 13 on the CNN programme State of the Union. “The wage gap that Democrats love to lecture about — the wage gap in 2019 was actually shrinking under Donald Trump’s administration, his economic policies, his energy policies, and his regulatory policies.”

Wages for Black Americans and Black men did rise under Trump, but Donalds ignored that they rose three times faster under Trump’s successor, President Joe Biden, even after adjusting for a period of 40-year-high inflation on Biden’s watch. Rather than narrowing under Trump, the Black-white wage gap widened.

“I can’t find any way that suggests that [Donalds] is right,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, a centre-right think tank. “No economist is pointing to this.”

Donalds’s office did not respond to an inquiry for this article.
Inflation-adjusted wages for Black men rose under Trump, then faster under Biden

First, let’s look at inflation-adjusted wages.

We turned to the standard metric for inflation-adjusted wages: the median usual weekly inflation-adjusted earnings for full-time wage and salary workers, age 16 and older. To fact-check Donalds, we looked at this statistic broken down for Black Americans overall, Black men, white Americans overall and white men.

This data goes back to 2000, so we will compare the full terms of US Presidents George W Bush, Barack Obama, Trump and Biden.

To compare these presidencies, we reduced month-to-month volatility by averaging the quarterly figures for each president to produce an overall average for his term. To make the fairest comparison, we removed the data for the four quarters of 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic’s peak period. During those quarters, federal stimulus checks spiked earnings for many workers, meaning that those months were outliers from the patterns before and after.

What do the numbers show?

For Black Americans overall, inflation-adjusted weekly earnings did rise under Trump. They increased from an average of about $275 under Obama to about $281 under Trump, a rise of roughly 2 percent. (The first six months of Obama’s presidency included the Great Recession, and much of his first term coincided with a sluggish recovery.)

Under Biden, wages went up even higher. Inflation-adjusted weekly wages for Black Americans rose from $281 under Trump to $298 under Biden — an increase of about 6 percent. The rise was about three times faster under Biden than under Trump.

The same pattern holds for Black men.

For Black men, inflation-adjusted weekly earnings rose from an average of about $290 under Obama to about $295 under Trump, an increase of roughly 1.8 percent.

Once again, wage growth was higher under Biden. Inflation-adjusted weekly wages for Black men rose from $295 under Trump to $312 under Biden, up 5.7 percent.
The white-Black wage gap widened under Trump

How about the wage gap — the difference in wages between white and Black Americans, and between white and Black men?

Using the same set of statistics, including the cordoning off of the pandemic period, we found the wage gap didn’t shrink, but widened under Trump.

During Obama’s presidency, inflation-adjusted wages for Black Americans trailed the equivalent figure for white Americans by $74.5 on average. Under Trump, that average gap rose to $84.9.
Advertisement

Under Biden, the gap narrowed to $74.40.

The same pattern held for Black men.

Under Obama, inflation-adjusted wages for Black men trailed the equivalent figure for white men by $96 on average. Under Trump, that average gap widened to $105.30.

Under Biden, the gap narrowed to $92.80, smaller than under Obama.

Why have wages for Black Americans, including Black men, risen faster under Biden? Some may have benefited from a more general trend among all races of lower-income Americans seeing unusually fast economic gains. With a low unemployment rate, workers have had greater leverage to get raises from their employers.
Advertisement

Pandemic-era stimulus efforts, including Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act, “had follow-on effects of giving workers more options and greater individual bargaining power, which led to higher real wages for those lower on the income scale and may be reflected in Black men’s higher wages and salaries under Biden than Trump,” said Calvin Schermerhorn, an Arizona State University historian who studies capitalism and African American inequality.

Holtz-Eakin agreed with Schermerhorn that the wage gains for lower-income workers may account for the rise under Biden, though he added that similar gains were occurring in 2019 under Trump, when the unemployment rate was roughly as low and the labour market was similarly tight. However, that stopped in a year or so with the pandemic, whereas Biden has had several years for this phenomenon to occur, magnifying the gains.

Our ruling

Donalds said, “Wages adjusted for inflation were massively up under Donald Trump for Black men. … The wage gap that Democrats love to lecture about — the wage gap in 2019 was actually shrinking under Donald Trump’s administration.”

For both Black Americans overall and for Black men in particular, inflation-adjusted wages rose under Trump — but they rose about three times faster under Biden.

The white-Black wage gap, both overall and for men in particular, didn’t shrink under Trump. Rather, it widened, before narrowing under Biden.
Advertisement


In summary, Donalds’s statement was mostly false.
Source: Al Jazeera
Zelensky unveils his ‘victory plan’ to end Putin’s invasion at Ukraine’s parliament

Russian forces launch one of their largest drone salvos at Ukraine in recent months
16/10/24
President Zelensky speaks to Ukraine’s parliament in Kyiv
 (Press Service Of The President Of Ukraine via AP)

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has unveiled his much-anticipated “victory plan” to end Vladimir Putin’s invasion hours after Russia fired scores of drones into Ukraine.

Mr Zelensky told Ukraine’s parliament that the plan could finish the war – which began with Russia’s invasion in February 2022 – no later than next year.


Mr Zelensky’s plan calls most significantly for the unconditional accession of Ukraine to Nato, the lifting of restrictions on long-range strikes on Russia using Western-supplied weapons, a refusal to trade Ukraine’s territories currently occupied by Russian forces, and the continuation of the Ukrainian incursion into the Kursk region of Russia.


“Together with our partners, we must change the circumstances so that the war ends. Regardless of what Putin wants. We must all change the circumstances so that Russia is forced to peace,” Mr Zelensky told Ukrainian MPs as he outlined the plan on Wednesday.

Mr Zelensky, who has unrelentingly called for a “fair” end to the war, says his plan is needed to force the Kremlin to negotiate in good faith, though he appeared to acknowledge in his speech that some allies see the war’s end game differently.


“We hear the word ‘negotiations’ from partners and the word ‘justice’ much less often. Ukraine is open to diplomacy, but honest [diplomacy],” he said.


The plan, which Mr Zelensky discussed with world leaders on a whirlwind tour of Europe and the US in the past weeks, also called for bolstered defence capabilities and a non-nuclear deterrence to Russian aggression.

Zelensky introduced the much-anticipated five-point plan on Wednesday (Ukrainian Presidential Press Service)

The Ukrainian leader did not elaborate on what the non-nuclear deterrence would involve, but said there were three secret addendums to the plan that he could only discuss with Ukraine’s allies.


The plan, Mr Zelensky added, also envisaged a Western role in investing in and jointly protecting Ukraine’s natural mineral resources from Russian attacks as well as post-war reconstruction pledges.

The plan is a major test of the political will of Kyiv’s key allies, who have poured in many billions of pounds worth of weapons to support Ukraine, while navigating fears of an “escalation” in a war against a nation with the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. On Wednesday evening, Mr Zelensky was set to speak on the phone with Joe Biden, with the White House due to announce a new security assistance package.

Zelensky said the war could be over next year if his plan is followed ((Press Service Of The President Of Ukraine via AP))

Nato has said Ukraine is heading for membership but has stopped short of issuing an invitation. The alliance’s new chief, Mark Rutte, said that Mr Zelensky’s plan was a strong signal, but that he was not able to support it as a whole as things stand.


Russia’s own war effort has been boosted by what Mr Zelensky said were North Korean transfers of arms and personnel. Earlier this year, the West and Ukraine said Iran had sent Russia close-range ballistic missiles, something Moscow denied. Mr Zelensky called Iran, North Korea and China a “coalition of criminals” for backing Russia. Beijing claims to be neutral over Russia’s invasion, but has held a number of summits with Putin.

The Kremlin told Kyiv to “sober up”, adding that it was too early to comment on the details of the plan – but that the policies Mr Zelensky is pursuing are futile.

Mr Zelensky said he would present the victory plan at an EU summit on Thursday. “We are at war with Russia on the battlefield, in international relations, in the economy, in the information sphere, and in people’s hearts,” he said.

Meanwhile, Russia fired scores of drones at Kyiv and other Ukrainian regions overnight into Wednesday, according to Ukraine’s air force.

Some 136 attack drones were fired at Ukraine, 51 of which were destroyed over 14 regions by Ukraine’s air defence and 20 of which were still in Ukrainian skies. The remaining 60 were unaccounted for.

A rescuer works at the site of a Russian drone attack on the Ternopil region overnight on Wednesday (via Reuters)

The drones set off a “large-scale fire” in the Ternopil region, but no casualties were reported, according to the region’s military administration.

Later on Wednesday, the Russian defence ministry claimed its forces had captured two villages in eastern Ukraine, Krasnyi Yar in the Donetsk region and Nevske in Luhansk region – two key eastern regions Russia is looking to control.

The Ukrainian military disputed these claims on Telegram, saying it had repelled Russian attacks near Krasnyi Yar on the Pokrovsk front, a focal point of many of Russia’s frontline attacks.

Zelensky’s plan in full:

An unconditional invitation to Nato: “We understand that Nato membership is a matter of the future, not the present. But Putin can see that his geopolitical calculations are headed for defeat,” Mr Zelensky said according to Reuters.

Bolstered defence capabilities: Mr Zelensky says Ukraine’s defensive abilities must be “irreversibly strengthened”, something he said can be done by removing restrictions on weapons use, partly referring to long-range drone strikes into Russian territory.

Deterrence: Ukraine’s Western allies should demonstrate to Moscow that further aggression by Moscow would have consequences with a “comprehensive non-nuclear strategic deterrence package”, Mr Zelensky said. There is a secret addendum to this part of the plan, which Mr Zelensky provided no further detail of.


Strategic economic agreement: Mr Zelensky called for an agreement between Ukraine, the US, the EU and other allies to allow for joint investments into and use of Ukraine’s natural resources, which he said were worth trillions of dollars.

Ukraine’s role in strengthening Nato: Mr Zelensky proposed Ukraine’s armed forces being used to enhance Nato’s security, replacing some US forces currently stationed in Europe.


NATO pledges money — not membership — as Zelenskyy brings victory plan to Brussels

Secretary-General Mark Rutte isn’t giving a clear answer to Kyiv’s demand for a speedy invitation to join the alliance.


NATO chief Mark Rutte said Wednesday that the alliance will reach a €40 billion military aid target for Ukraine, but was fuzzier on just when Ukraine will get into the alliance. | Simon Wohlfahrt/AFP via Getty Images

October 16, 2024 
By Stuart Lau


BRUSSELS — Kyiv will get cash from NATO, but the alliance is waffling on President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s call for Ukraine to get a clear invitation to join the alliance to deter Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

NATO chief Mark Rutte said Wednesday that the alliance will reach a €40 billion military aid target for Ukraine, but was fuzzier on just when Ukraine will get into the alliance.

That’s not what Zelenskyy wants to hear ahead of his visit to Brussels Thursday to push his so-called victory plan, which was presented Wednesday to Ukraine’s parliament. He aims to end the war by securing a NATO membership invitation plus continued arms shipments to force Russia to the negotiating table

Zelenskyy is due to meet EU leaders and NATO defense ministers, including U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.

Rutte was non-committal about Zelenskyy’s appeal, saying there are many aspects in his plan that require ongoing, closed-door discussions between NATO countries and Ukraine. He would only repeat NATO’s pledge that Ukraine’s path to membership is “irreversible.”

Although NATO is “standing squarely behind” Kyiv, Rutte said, that “doesn't mean that I here can say I support the whole plan — that would be a bit difficult, because there are many issues of course you need to understand better.”

He added: “The plan has many aspects and many political and military issues. We really need to hammer out with Ukrainians to understand what is behind it, to see what we can do, what we cannot do.”

Although NATO has long said that Ukraine will eventually be allowed to join, it has not issued an actual invitation. The idea worries many member countries, who fear the alliance could end up being dragged into a war with nuclear-armed Russia.

While membership for Kyiv was pushed to the back burner, the alliance said it will meet a financial target set by former Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg. The goal is to ensure a steady flow of cash and weapons to Ukraine amid the political uncertainties of the U.S. presidential election.

“I’m delighted to report that we are firmly on track to delivering [on] the €40 billion pledge for the coming year as agreed in Washington,” Rutte told a press conference on Wednesday, referring to the NATO leaders’ summit in July.

“I can announce today that NATO allies committed €20.9 billion in military assistance to Ukraine during the first half of 2024, and allies are on track to meet their commitments for the rest of the year,” he said.

Rutte also confirmed that a NATO hub in Wiesbaden, Germany to deliver military assistance to Ukraine will be operational next month.

While Ukraine’s Western partners dither about giving Kyiv permission to use donated weapons to hit targets inside Russia and over just when it should be allowed into NATO, Russia’s allies are ramping up their support for Moscow. There are reports from Kyiv that North Korean troops have been dispatched to the war — although Rutte said NATO had no confirmed information yet.

“The growing alignment of authoritarian actors like China, Russia, North Korea and Iran is undermining stability in the Euro-Atlantic and in the Indo-Pacific regions,” Rutte said.

In a sign of the global challenge being posed to democracies, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand will take part in the NATO defense ministers’ meeting on Thursday and Friday for the first time in the alliance’s history.

What do Australian teens think about a ban on their social media? 

REUTERS

Oct 16, 2024 #ban #socialmedia #teenagersAustralia’s government announced last month it plans to ban younger teenagers from using social media. But many young Australians say the proposed age-based ban would isolate them further. 

Read the story here: https://reut.rs/487vX10


Girls perform better academically in more gender-equal countries



\

Benjamin Blevins
October 16th, 2024

The higher a nation’s gender equality rating the better its girls perform at school. Better educational outcomes raise communities out of poverty, boost economic potential, and improve health outcomes, writes Ben Blevins.

In African countries with higher levels of gender equality, girls are outperforming boys in the classroom. In nations like Mauritius and Botswana, where social gender equality is more advanced, girls are scoring higher than boys in both reading and mathematics—traditionally male-dominated subjects. And in HIV-AIDS awareness, critical for health education, girls in more gender-equal countries are also taking the lead.


It’s a fascinating topic with big implications. Gender equality isn’t just about fairness or human rights. It has a direct impact on educational outcomes. When boys and girls have more equal opportunities in society, girls thrive academically.

This trend is especially noticeable at the top academic levels. But what’s even more powerful is that gender equality seems to have the greatest benefit for students who are struggling the most with their test scores.

The data behind the story

A recent study examined the performance of more than 60,000 students, aged between 13 and 14 years on average, across 14 African countries using the Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality dataset. This, the third study in the series, ran from 2006 to 2011. These students were tested in reading, mathematics, and HIV-AIDS awareness. The researchers then compared their scores against their countries’ global gender equality rankings.

The results were clear. In countries with higher gender equality, girls performed significantly better. In Mauritius, for example, girls outscored boys across the board. In Botswana and South Africa, girls outperformed boys in mathematics. Even in Tanzania, where boys scored better in reading overall, the gap between the genders was much smaller.

What’s especially intriguing is that these gains aren’t just in reading and math. In countries where gender equality is stronger, girls are more knowledgeable about HIV-AIDS; information that could be lifesaving. This suggests that gender equality can positively affect not only academic success but also their well-being.

Equality in education


Gender equality in education matters because it levels the playing field. When girls are given the same opportunities and societal support as boys, they rise to the challenge.

The real game-changer is the impact on lower-performing students. In countries with lower gender equality, it’s the girls in the bottom quartile—the ones who are already struggling—who benefit the most from improvements in gender equality. Investing in gender-equal education can help lift those who need it the most, closing the achievement gap at every level.

Africa is home to a wide variety of education systems, cultures, and levels of development. While some countries like Botswana and Mauritius are making significant strides in gender equality and education, others still have a long way to go.

In countries with greater gender inequality, boys tend to outperform girls in most subjects. But even in these places, the gap is shrinking as gender equality improves.

Globally, we’ve seen girls overtake boys in terms of years spent in school, especially in high-income countries. Yet, in Africa, girls are still underrepresented in the classroom, particularly in higher education. Primary school enrolment for girls has improved across the continent but keeping them in school and ensuring they achieve at the same level as boys remains a challenge.

The power of policy and investment


The data sends a clear message: investing in gender equality pays off in better education returns for girls. Countries that have made gender equality a priority are seeing real results in the classroom. But this doesn’t happen overnight. It takes deliberate policies that break down barriers for girls, ensuring they have the same access to education as boys.

However, for many African countries, significant challenges remain. Despite government policies that promote free primary education, many families still struggle to afford the hidden costs of schooling, such as uniforms and supplies. In regions where child marriage or gender-based violence is prevalent, girls face even greater barriers to staying and learning in school.

Certain countries are leading the way. South Africa, for instance, has implemented free primary education and support programs like the School Nutrition Programme and Child Support Grant, which help keep children—especially girls—in school. Botswana has similarly made strides in creating gender-equal educational opportunities, and the results have been reflected in the classroom.

The path forward


Gender equality is essential for educational success. When girls are given the same opportunities as boys, they thrive academically, and this benefits everyone. But beyond the classroom, gender equality in education can lift entire communities out of poverty, spur economic growth, and improve health outcomes, particularly in regions hardest hit by diseases like HIV.

African countries have a unique opportunity to harness the power of education by investing in both boys and girls equally. By breaking down the barriers that hold girls back, governments can unlock the full potential of the next generation.

In short, gender equality in education is about more than just closing the gap between boys and girls. It’s about building a future where every child regardless of gender has the chance to succeed. In Africa, where the potential for growth is immense, that’s a future worth investing in.

Photo credit: Cornell University used with permission CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

About the author

Benjamin Blevins is a development economist with over 15 years of experience in education, food security, and sustainable development across Africa and Asia. He has worked with UNICEF, Africa Educational Trust, and Hiroshima University, leading data-driven projects and research. He holds a Ph.D. in Development Economics from Hiroshima University.
Opinion

Did Hezbollah neglect to protect civilians in southern Lebanon?


October 16, 2024 

Emergency teams and civilians are seen around a car which was left unusable after an Israeli army unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) attack which killed one person and caused harm in Sidon of Lebanon on August 21, 2024
 [Stringer/Anadolu Agency]

by Nidal Adaileh

As soon as Hezbollah entered the war with Israel by firing rockets across the border in solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza on 8 October last year, thousands of families in southern Lebanon rushed to pack up their belongings and head north. As the Israeli occupation forces continue to bombard the south relentlessly, anxiety has spread in Beirut with displaced people from the south arriving in the capital. Some of the city’s residents have started to leave.

In August 2024, a short Hezbollah video — “Our Mountains Are Our Storehouses” — showed what appeared to be tunnels large enough to accommodate truck convoys. Some trucks appear to be transporting missiles and launchers through one of the tunnels, which has been identified as “Imad 4”, a reference to military commander Imad Mughniyeh, who was killed in a car bombing in Damascus in 2008.

Israel has been aware of these underground facilities “for some time” and now has experience dealing with Hamas tunnels in Gaza. This is believed to be the challenge that Israel will face if it invades Lebanon in its totality.

Despite Hezbollah’s tunnel network, Lebanon lacks enough shelters and safe spaces for civilians. The problem is not limited to the absence of places which provide some degree of protection against bombs. Rather, it goes beyond that to the absence of plans and visions to confront multiple disasters. While some Lebanese mocked the Israelis who headed for the shelters when the sirens sounded to be safe from Hezbollah’s rockets, the people of Lebanon are vulnerable to homelessness due to the lack of an organised shelter plan.

Hezbollah had to decide between building tunnels and constructing more shelters to protect the residents of the south from Israeli bombs. With the Lebanese living in fear of the war waged by Israel, we recall the massacres that have been part of every act of aggression against their country.

It would have been better for the movement to build shelters to protect civilians, especially in the south of Lebanon, and keep them on their land instead of displacing them to Beirut, the mountains and other areas. Israeli settlements have shelters, which gives some reassurance and sense of security to the residents.

In Lebanon, there are no sirens and few shelters when artillery shells and bombs are incoming. Hezbollah has always relied on internal displacement as a means of protecting civilians, because the wars on Lebanon generally do not target the whole country. Israel usually avoids bombing Christian areas because it does not want to anger Europe, and aims to sow religious discord in Lebanese society.

In anticipation of what will happen next, Israel is opening new shelters that cost millions of dollars to build. The Lebanese, however, do not know where to go or what to do in the event of an extension of Israeli air strikes.

Why did Hezbollah not prepare for these wars despite being at the heart of the conflict with the occupation state? Can the Lebanese infrastructure withstand the pressure resulting from intensive bombing campaigns? The party should have built more shelters for civilians, instead of just tunnels that only meet their military requirements; and it should have stopped using some of the few shelters that exist to store weapons and ammunition instead of being made available to civilians.
Bats turn former coal mines into breeding ground

Hayley Coyle
BBC News

Daubenton's Bats (similar to the one pictured above) are among the species found in the mines

Bats have turned a collection of abandoned coal mines into a prime mating spot, experts say.

Conservationists found eight species of bat using the mineshafts and surrounding moorland near Barnsley as an "autumn swarming" location.

Following a year-long study, the 28-hecatare site, which sits above a Yorkshire Water reservoir, has been granted Local Wildlife Status by Barnsley Council.

Sean Davey, lead ecologist for Yorkshire Water, said "autumn swarming" - where bats find a mate - was crucial for a healthy bat population.

Yorkshire Water
The bats' activity has been captured using night vision technology


The study, conducted by the South Yorkshire Bat Group and Yorkshire Water, included 24/7 acoustic monitoring and filming with night vision to monitor the bats' activity.

The team used special techniques to safely catch swarming bats, and were able to identify eight different species, including Natterer's, Daubenton's and Pipistrelle bats, using the area for breeding and feeding.

Mr Davey said: “Bat swarming sites are more commonly found in wooded lowland areas so it’s particularly interesting to find swarming happening up on this exposed moor with no trees around."

He explained that swarming sites are thought to have quite a large "catchment", with tiny bats flying "impressive distances" in order to swarm and find a mate.

Female bats only give birth to one offspring each year, so swarming in the autumn is "critical" for raising the next year’s generation of bats, he added.

Yorkshire Water
Barnsley Council has now given the area the mines are in Local Wildlife Status


Robin Franklin, cabinet spokesperson for regeneration and culture, said: “It’s great to hear that we have protected species in our borough.

"Bats as a group provide an excellent indicator of the wider health of their eco-system; monitoring projects like this are therefore an important tool for conservationists."

UK Slavery reparations not on agenda, says Starmer


Several Caribbean governments are demanding a discussion on reparations at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting being held next week

16th October 2024
Written by: Sinai Fleary
Voice Online 

DOWNING STREET has said slavery reparations is “not on the agenda” ahead of a meeting with Caribbean leaders.

Several Caribbean governments wanted to discuss reparations at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting being held next week in Samoa.

Sir Hilary Beckles, chairman of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Reparations Commission, has said the region need a summit with European nations to develop of “reparatory justice model.”

But the idea of discussing reparations has been rejected by Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Asked about paying reparations for Britain’s role in slavery, spokesman for the Prime Minister, said on Monday: “Just to be clear, reparations are not on the agenda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting.

“Technically, the Government’s position on this has not changed. We do not pay reparations.

“The Prime Minister is attending the summit to discuss the shared challenges and opportunities faced by the Commonwealth, including driving growth across our economies.’

Beckles also expressed the UK’s Labour government – with David Lammy as new foreign secretary – would support reparations talks but questions Lammy’s ability to push the issue forward.

“(Lammy) has been a supporter of the (reparations) discourse while he was in opposition,” Beckles said. “The question is whether he would be given a free hand in his government… to take the matter to a higher level.”
The Brattle Report

According to the Brattle Report, Britain owes a staggering £18.6 trillion in reparations – over five times the country’s annual gross domestic product.

The calculation of money owed to the Caribbean and the Americas was made by academics for the prestigious University of the West Indies.

The Brattle Report takes into account loss of liberty, forgone earnings, deprivation and mental pain and anguish during slavery.

And intergenerational trauma, loss of heritage, differences in life expectancy, unemployment and income disparity after emancipation.
‘Unacceptable’

Earlier this month, Barbados Prime Minister criticised reparations packages which have been put forward without any input from the Caribbean or descendants of enslaved people.

Mia Mottley referenced the Church of England’s £100 million reparations fund for its role in the Transatlantic slave trade and said the church failed to have a conversation about what would be appropriate for reparations.

She described the lack of inclusion as “unacceptable.”

In March this year, the Church of England announced that Black-led organisations would be the beneficiaries of a £100 million fund aimed at addressing the church’s role in slavery.

While delivering a keynote speech at the Open Society Foundations United Nations Summit in New York last week, Mottley said: “When the Church of England commissioned the study on Queen Anne’s Bounty and determined that they would give reparations of £100 million it is a step in the right direction.”

But she also added the reparations offer “ignored the agency of us and they never stopped to ask us or have a conversation with us, as to what is appropriate.”