Thursday, February 06, 2025

 

Scientist discovers 16 new grasshopper species, champions desert biodiversity




Mississippi State University
Agroecotettix silverheelsi 

image: 

Pictured is Agroecotettix silverheelsi, a newly described grasshopper from Texas named in honor of Jay Silverheels, an early Native American actor. Mississippi State’s JoVonn Hill, director of the Mississippi Entomological Museum, has uncovered 16 new species of grasshoppers, and his work was recently published in the scientific journal Zookeys.

view more 

Credit: JoVonn Hill




STARKVILLE, Miss.—A Mississippi State University scientist has discovered a hopping treasure trove—16 new species of grasshoppers living in the thorny scrubs of U.S. and Mexican deserts.

Prior to JoVonn Hill’s finding, only three species of Agroecotettix were known. Hill, director of MSU’s Mississippi Entomological Museum, said the careful examination of our environment remains critical.

“It is important to keep exploring our biodiversity, especially from a conservation standpoint, before we lose it,” Hill said.

These newly uncovered species, native to the southern U.S. and Mexican deserts, showcase the thriving biodiversity in arid ecosystems. Published in the scientific journal ZooKeys, Hill’s article “Desert Diversification: Revision of Agroecotettix Bruner, 1908 (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Melanoplinae) with Descriptions of Sixteen New Species from the United States and Mexico” provides valuable insights into the region’s evolution and ecology. The article is available online at https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/133703.

Hill, an assistant professor in MSU’s Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, said this grasshopper genus likely diversified during the Pleistocene Epoch, also known as the Ice Age. He noted that in the Rocky Mountains, species of this subfamily in alpine grasslands likely became isolated as glaciers receded and their habitats shifted to higher elevations. Hill suspects the desert species his team discovered underwent a similar process of isolation and speciation.

“These grasshoppers we described live in a lowland thorny scrub habitat. Somewhere along the line, they, too, got isolated and speciated, because each one is still associated with a specific mountain range,” he said. “Their sexually selective nature and lack of premating rituals have kept populations stable and tied to specific mountain ranges.”

DNA from collected specimens will be sequenced by collaborators at the University of Michigan and will help confirm these observations. Using a molecular clock, Hill’s team will estimate when the species diverged, revealing how past climate change influenced distributions and how future shifts may affect them.

Understanding the past impacts of climate change can also help us prepare for what we may face in the future, Hill said. Plus, it’s a reminder that there’s still so much to discover, even in our own backyard.”

Funded by the National Science Foundation, this project complements two others. In one, Hill and mentor Daniel Otte, a senior curator at the Academy of Natural Sciences, are coauthoring “The North American Grasshoppers, Volume III.”

“These grasshoppers are a part of the Melanoplinae subfamily, which is the most diverse subfamily of North American grasshoppers, and most of our major grasshopper pest species occur in that genus. There are a lot of new species to be discovered, and we’re trying to get them all described before we produce the book,” he said.

The second project, in partnership with Lacey Knowles at the University of Michigan, examines the factors driving Melanoplinae diversity across North America and Mexico by sampling over 600 species.

“That study aims to determine what produced this diversity, when it occurred and how individual populations may have become isolated over time,” Hill said.

“I loved catching grasshoppers as a kid, and I still get to do it now—discovering new things, uncovering their history and understanding how they’re related,” the MSU researcher said. “Sharing this fascinating piece of American natural heritage makes it all worthwhile.”

Collaborators include Vilas Brown, Brady Dunaway, Ray Fisher, Mallory Grady, Alexandra Hendon, Jennifer Seltzer, Jacqueline Seltzer-Hill, Rowan Seltzer-Hill and Matthew Thorn. Funding partners include the NSF, Texas Ecolab, the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and MAFES.

Explore more at Mississippi State University’s Entomological Museum at www.mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu. For more information about MSU’s Department of Agricultural Science and Plant Protection, visit www.agscipp.msstate.edu.

Mississippi State University is taking care of what matters. Learn more at www.msstate.edu.

Could new project result in more harmonious future for humans and kittiwakes?



A groundbreaking research project aims to explore kittiwakes’ unique role in urban ecology and propose innovative strategies to ensure the birds can coexist successfully with humans in the future.



Northumbria University

Navigating Urban Ecologies 

image: 

From left to right, Jenny Alderson and Hayley Duff of Baltic; and Dr Ayse Ozbil Torun, Dr Bing Zhai and Dr Jiayi Jin of Northumbria University.

view more 

Credit: Simon Veit-Wilson/Northumbria University




The River Tyne’s kittiwakes are a global urban rarity. As the only seabird species to nest in city environments, these birds have become icons of Newcastle and Gateshead.

Since the 1960s, they’ve adapted to urban life, establishing colonies on iconic structures like the Tyne Bridge and Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art.

But the birds’ presence hasn’t always been welcomed by the area’s human population – and the noise and mess caused by hundreds of breeding pairs of kittiwakes has led to many riverside businesses installing deterrents such as spikes and nets.

Now, a groundbreaking research project aims to explore the kittiwakes’ unique role in urban ecology and propose innovative strategies to ensure the birds can coexist successfully with humans in the future.

The team behind the project are calling for people living in the North East to get involved by sending them video footage, photos and audio clips of the kittiwakes, taken at any time over the last 10 years.

This will help them build up a picture of how the birds are currently sharing the quayside area with people, and how this could be improved to make life better for both kittiwakes and humans in the future.

The research has been awarded a Design Exchange Partnership (DEP) as part of the ambitious, multi-million-pound Future Observatory: Design the Green Transition fund led by London’s Design Museum and the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC).

Launched this month, the study embraces a "more-than-human" perspective, emphasising the relationships between Tyne kittiwakes, urban infrastructure, and human communities.

It focuses on the tidal estuary’s unique ecological characteristics, which provide critical habitats despite often being overlooked or undervalued.

By addressing the complexities of urban biodiversity, the research aims to establish a governance framework that promotes harmonious coexistence between humans and wildlife.

The study will employ a range of analytic tools to assess the impacts of urban development on biodiversity, including urban modelling, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and machine learning.

It will also engage local communities in participatory workshops, co-creating solutions alongside residents, ornithologists, urban planners, and NGOs.

The project team brings together experts from architecture, urban studies, computer science, and ornithology, and is led by Dr Jiayi Jin, Assistant Professor of Architecture and Urban Studies at Northumbria University.

She will be joined by Northumbria colleagues Dr Bing Zhai, from the Department of Computer and Information Sciences who will lead machine learning and bird identification; and Dr Ayse Ozbil Torun from the Department of Architecture and Built Environment, who will analyse spatial distributions using GIS and integrate findings into the urban model.

The team will be supported by Daniel Turner, an experienced ornithologist and kittiwake research expert from the Natural History Society of Northumbria.

Daniel and the core academic team will lead public engagement activities in collaboration with Wild Intrigue and Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art, the project’s non-academic partners.

Sarah Munro, Director of Baltic said: “As a study partner, Navigating Urban Ecologies will enable even more opportunities for Baltic visitors to connect with the Tyne Kittiwakes through creative workshops, knowledge-sharing and participation in this exciting study.

“We are thrilled to be able to connect the study to our large and diverse audience, giving people a unique insight into these wild sea birds who we share our building and city with for half the year, each year.”

The project emphasises the ecological significance of estuarine spaces like the River Tyne, highlighting their role as critical habitats and zones of exchange for human and non-human life.

By combining scientific research, urban planning, and public participation, the study will help to position Newcastle and Gateshead as global leaders in biodiversity-friendly urban development.

This initiative not only addresses the challenges faced by Tyne kittiwakes but also envisions cities as inclusive spaces where nature and humanity thrive together.

As part of the project there is an art and an architecture competition taking place, with entries from the local community encouraged.

The research team are also asking for anyone who has photo, video or audio recordings of the kittiwakes, both recent and from the last 10 years, to submit files through the project website.

A number of public events will also be held, with the first taking place on Thursday 20 February, from 6pm to 8pm at the Farrell Centre, Elson Place, Newcastle.

This event, entitled City Forum: Exploring Urban Ecologies through Collaborative Participation, will involve talks by Dr Jiayi Jin, Dr Ayse Ozbil Torun and Dr Bing Zhai of Northumbria University; Cain Scrimgeour, Co-Director of Wild Intrigue; ornithologist Daniel Turner, of the Natural History Society of Northumbria; and artist Julia Heslop, a research fellow at Newcastle University.

For more information about the project or to get involved please contact Dr Jiayi (Jennifer) Jin or visit the project website.









Black-legged Kittiwake Identification, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology

 

Global “sisterhood” seeks to understand what makes a healthy vaginal microbiome



Cell Press

World distribution of the vaginal microbiome data 

image: 

World distribution of the vaginal microbiome data studies using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

view more 

Credit: Trends in Microbiology, Lebeer et al.




Vaginas host a complex microcosm of bacteria and yeasts that can fluctuate over time. However, little is known about these microbial communities and their roles in a person’s health, and 9 out of 10 studies only include participants from one continent, resulting in major geographical gaps in data. In a paper publishing February 6 in the Cell Press journal Trends in Microbiology, scientists share insights gleaned from a “sisterhood” of thousands of citizen scientists and demonstrate how international collaboration can help illuminate the gaps in our knowledge about the vaginal microbiome, including which bacteria are helpful or harmful and whether microbiomes look different for people across the globe. 

“Women’s health is essential to global societal and economic wellbeing, yet health disparities remain prevalent,” write the researchers, comprised of scientists from 4 continents and 9 countries, including lead author Sarah Lebeer (@SarahLebeer) of the University of Antwerp in Belgium. “Women’s bodies, and knowledge concerning their health have been neglected, controlled, and persecuted for centuries, resulting in a health disparity that persists today.” 

The authors are involved in citizen science initiatives called the Isala Sisterhood, which aim to inspire research on women’s health and microbiomes worldwide by creating a reference map of vaginal microbiota. Originally launched in Belgium as the Isala Project with over 6,000 participants, the Isala Project has grown into a “sisterhood” including microbiologists, health care workers, governmental organizations, and the public, and branched out across North America, South America, Asia, Africa, and Europe.  

Lebeer and her team compiled insights from the Isala Sisterhood and other similar initiatives alongside almost 100 years of research. Key takeaways include the following: 

  • There are five different categories of “healthy” vaginal microbiotas commonly used in the field, described based on the vagina’s most dominant bacterial species. These include Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant, Lactobacillus gasseri-dominant, Lactobacillus iners-dominant, Lactobacillus jensenii-dominant, and a fifth category that includes a mixture of other species. However, the Isala Project has found that within the Belgian population, over 10% of participants fall outside of these categories. Therefore, the project recommends “considering the whole complexity and continuity of the vaginal microbiota composition and functionality” instead of relying on the categories. 

  • Several studies have found associations between the makeup of the vaginal microbiota and clinical conditions. One of the most well-researched is the impact of a reduction in lactobacilli, which often results in an overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria, potentially leading to health impacts including preterm birth, urinary tract infections, endometritis, and sexually transmitted infections. 

  • A common condition caused by a reduction in lactobacilli is bacterial vaginosis which is typically treated using targeted antibiotics with limited efficacy—up to 60% of the time, symptoms resurface. Vaginal live biotherapeutic products, FDA-approved treatments that use live microorganisms, may be more effective in treating or preventing these and other vagina-related health conditions than existing treatment options. 

  • Some studies suggest that certain cultural hygiene behaviors such as vaginal douching can contribute to a higher risk of conditions such as vaginal dysbiosis. The authors note that examples such as this show that differences in the vaginal microbiome—and the health disparities they might correspond to—can be attributed to both biological and social factors. 

  • Several other types of microbes exist in vaginal microbiomes, including yeasts, viruses, and other types of bacteria. However, the roles they play in the microbiota and a person’s health are largely unexplored. 

  • In general, lower- and middle-income countries are underrepresented in microbiome research. The authors note that infrastructure, technology, and finances likely contribute to these disparities and recommend leveraging international collaborations that share resources ranging from lab materials to communications techniques in an effort to overcome these challenges. 

  • Initiatives like the Isala Project and its sisterhood—including the Vaginal Human Microbiome project, which is working to map the vaginal microbiomes of people from different ethnic backgrounds across the United States—aimed at “closing the vaginal microbiome data gap” are growing in number across the world. 

The authors emphasize the importance of continuing to study the vaginal microbiome and its connection to a person’s overall health through studies that focus on geographical and socioeconomic diversity and consider social and cultural factors. 

“To promote better preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies for women affected by conditions associated with the vaginal microbiota, more research on the functions and diversity of the vaginal microbiota is urgently needed in different parts of the world,” write the authors. “This way, we can better understand what a healthy vaginal microbiome looks like in each geographical location.” 

### 

Trends in Microbiology, Lebeer et al., “Diversity in women and their vaginal microbiota.” https://www.cell.com/trends/microbiology/fulltext/S0966-842X(24)00328-7.

Trends in Microbiology, (@TrendsMicrobiol) published by Cell Press, is a monthly review journal that provides a multidisciplinary forum for the discussion of all aspects of microbiology—from cell biology and immunology to genetics and evolution—and ranges across virology, bacteriology, protozoology, and mycology. Visit http://www.cell.com/trends/microbiology. To receive Cell Press media alerts, please contact press@cell.com

 

Fear of breast cancer recurrence: Impact and coping with being in a dark place



Regenstrief Institute





INDIANAPOLIS – Breast cancer is the world’s most prevalent cancer. Although earlier detection and targeted treatment have resulted in high survival rates, many breast cancer survivors experience fear of cancer recurrence. For some survivors this fear is occasional, for others it is persistent and often debilitating.

A new study of breast cancer survivors has found this psychosocial challenge impacts almost every important domain of their lives – the emotional, behavioral, cognitive, relational and professional. A larger number of domains was affected, and they were affected more frequently in those with greater fear of recurrence.

“Study participants were reportedly disease free and trying to rebuild their lives during their post-treatment survivorship,” said senior author Shelley Johns, PsyD, a researcher-clinician with the Regenstrief Institute, the Indiana University School of Medicine and the IU Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center. “Our findings provide clarity about how breast cancer survivors are impacted by fear of recurrence and insight into how they cope with this understandable fear.”

The impact of fear of recurrence ranged from mildly to severely disruptive. Women experiencing mild fear reported sporadic occurrences. Those with significant fear described it as persistent and/or easily triggered across multiple life domains.

Disturbed sleep prior to mammograms was reported by survivors with mild fear, while frequent need to absent themselves from social activities, get into bed and pull the blanket over their eyes to avoid thinking about cancer was an example of severe, also known as clinical, fear of recurrence. Approximately 74 percent of study participants were experiencing clinical fear of recurrence.

347 women completed the study’s open-ended survey:

  • Many reported feelings of stress, irritability and sadness.
  • Some said fear of recurrence frequently interrupted their train of thought, for example interfering with their job when their disease popped into their mind. 
  • Survivors who thought that they were more worried than they should be compared to other breast cancer survivors reported feelings of embarrassment. 
  • Some indicated it was too hard to be around their family because they were constantly wondering how many more Christmases and birthdays they were going to have with their children.

The paper’s title includes the phrase, “out of a dark place,” a direct quote from a breast cancer survivor who said that she joined the study to support “getting out of a dark place.”

Other survivors noted the specific impact of fear of cancer recurrence on daily life:

  • “It motivates me to maintain healthy habits. Such as eating five servings of fruits and vegetables, working out and drinking less alcohol. It also motivates me to maintain mental health and physical health.”
  • “Whenever I feel any kind of pain or discomfort in the area where I had cancer it concerns me and I feel anxious and irritable.”
  • “Cancer is all around us. Everything is a trigger. Anniversaries, other family/friends’ diagnosis, commercials about drugs, social media, etc. …it’s a daily thought or a daily emotion.”
  • “Sit for hours doing nothing, do not turn on TV, sleepless, find hours pass by and I am in the same place just thinking, do not participate in activities, get lost driving because I’m deep in thought, compulsive online shopping, collecting things.”

Survivors offered specifics on their coping mechanisms:

  • “Just trying to be positive, eat healthy, take my meds, get enough sleep, exercise three times a week, and hope for the best.”
  • “I try to avoid things that make me think about recurrence. For example, unfollowing social media accounts, fast forwarding or leaving the room when commercials about cancer medications are on.”
  • “I try not to focus on it. I also speak with family members who have lived with cancer longer than myself.”
  • “Prayer, meditation, staying in the moment, and focusing on making the best of each day.”

While many survivors cited avoidance of thoughts and feelings as their primary coping behavior, Dr. Johns, a health services researcher and clinical health psychologist, observes that research is needed to probe the function of various coping behaviors to determine if they are helpful.

In a question seldom posed to participants in a clinical trial, when asked what they hoped to gain by participating in the study, the majority indicated that they sought senses of purpose, belonging, control and connection with others.

The paper concludes, “Fear of cancer recurrence is one of the most common psychological challenges for cancer survivors. Understanding affected life domains, coping strategies employed prior to intervention, and reasons for seeking guidance can inform the development and implementation of evidence-based interventions to effectively address fear of cancer recurrence among persons living with breast cancer.”

This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01CA255480 (PI: Shelley Johns, PsyD) and T32CA117865 (PI: Victoria Champion, PhD) and the Walther Cancer Foundation (PI: Shelley Johns, PsyD).

Getting Out of a Dark Place": a qualitative exploration of the impact, current coping, and what people with breast cancer hope to gain by participating in a fear of recurrence clinical trial” is published in the peer-reviewed journal Supportive Care in Cancer.

Authors and affiliations as listed in the paper:

Betsey Zenk Nuseibeh1Michelle S Hoy2Janet E Panoch2Tayler M Gowan3Deborah M Buckles4Madison E Schwarz2Shelley A Johns2,3.

1Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA.

2Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

3Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

4Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Shelley A. Johns, PsyD  
In addition to her role as a research scientist with the William M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research at Regenstrief Institute, Shelley A. Johns, PsyD, is a board-certified clinical health psychologist. Dr. Johns serves as an associate professor of medicine and is the Walther Scholar in Psycho-Oncology at the Indiana University School of Medicine. She also is a clinician-scientist at the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center.

SHERLOCK HOLMES SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESIS


 

 

Tax giveaways create more jobs when someone’s watching



States that subject business subsidies to internal disclosure see more employment and spend less per job



University of Texas at Austin





In 2019, Kansas and Missouri called a truce in a subsidies war. After competing to lure businesses to their respective sides of Kansas City, they found they’d collectively spent $350 million over 10 years to net a paltry 1,500 jobs. They halted the practice of giving tax breaks to relocate in their border-adjacent counties.

Although business tax subsidies have tripled in size over 30 years, it’s not uncommon for companies to take them and then fail to create the promised jobs, says Lisa De Simone, professor of accounting at Texas McCombs.

Rather than eliminating subsidies, other states have tried a different tactic to make sure subsidies deliver economically. They’ve passed disclosure laws, requiring that information about the subsidies be reported” such as the amount of the subsidy or the number of jobs created. They reason that transparency pressures companies to make good on their promises and governments to hold them accountable.

In new research, De Simone finds disclosure laws are effective in boosting local employment — at least, some kinds of disclosure laws.

The effective ones, she found, are internal disclosure laws. They require the granting state agency to report a tax break to other state agencies. Not only do they lead to more jobs, she found, but they also save taxpayers money.

By contrast, external disclosure laws, which release subsidy news to the public, appear to have little to no job impact.

“There have been a lot of calls for more disclosure around business tax subsidies to make sure governments use them in good ways,” De Simone says. “But clearly, just having some type of law is not enough.”

Internal Disclosures Pay Off

With Rebecca Lester of Stanford University and Aneesh Raghunandan of Yale University, De Simone used data on state and local subsidies from the nonprofit Good Jobs First.

Their sample included 48,243 subsidies across 27 states from 2008 to 2015. The average subsidy was worth $330,000, adding up to $15 billion.

The researchers focused on smaller subsidies such as tax credits, tax abatements, tax reimbursements, and grants. Such deals are more widespread than multimillion-dollar megadeals, De Simone says, and they draw less attention from the press.

She and her colleagues correlated those deals with employment data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau. They compared the job impacts in states with internal disclosure laws — 93% had them at some point during the study period — against those that didn’t.

They found that by subjecting subsidies to internal disclosure laws, states:

  • Reduce the number of subsidies needed to generate the same number of jobs. The average county could offer 1.2 to 1.7 fewer subsidies per subsidy recipient.
  • Reduced their cost per new local job created by up to $8,100, which amounts to $594 million in nationwide savings.

“You get as much benefit from one subsidy with internal monitoring as you do from two without,” De Simone says. “So, internal disclosure laws seem pretty valuable.”

Why External Disclosures Don’t Work

External disclosure laws, on the other hand, had little effect on job numbers. The study found that governments often circumvent the laws by choosing other types of incentives, which don’t require disclosure, or post outdated information that impedes public monitoring.

De Simone says governments might have several reasons for avoiding external disclosure. Officials might worry about backlash, if a subsidy doesn’t create the expected number of jobs.

Or, she says, “It could be more nefarious, if the whole aim is to give subsidies out to their buddies, and they don’t want that information to become public.”

She hopes her study might encourage public pressure for clearer, more up-to-date government information on business tax subsidies. Better monitoring might deter marginal companies from making empty promises of job creation — or from applying for subsidies in the first place.

“If we had better monitoring and better information, we would probably have more efficient and effective subsidies, and we’d be saving taxpayer dollars,” De Simone says. “Eventually, governments might have to come to terms with offering up better information.”

Tax Subsidy Disclosure and Local Economic Effects” is published in the Journal of Accounting Research.