Wednesday, April 23, 2025

 

Roman-era skeleton from Britain is rare evidence of human-animal gladiator combat



The bones show evidence of bite marks from a large cat such as a lion, used in some gladiator shows




PLOS

Unique osteological evidence for human-animal gladiatorial combat in Roman Britain 

image: 

Puncture injuries by large felid scavenging on both sides of bone.

view more 

Credit: Thompson et al., 2025, PLOS One, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)





A skeleton from Roman-era England has bite marks consistent with those of a large cat like a lion, suggesting that this individual may have died as part of a gladiator show or execution, according to a study published April 23, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS One by Tim Thompson from Maynooth University, Ireland, and colleagues.

Records of gladiator combat in the Roman Empire have been well-documented, with evidence of both human-human conflicts and fights between humans and animals such as lions and bears. But actual gladiator remains are relatively scarce in the archaeological record — and in Britain specifically, which was occupied by the Romans from the first through fifth centuries, there has so far been no confirmed evidence of human-animal combat.

The skeleton described in the new paper was likely buried sometime between 200-300 CE, near the Roman city of Eboracum, which is now York. This site contains the remains of mostly younger men, often with evidence of trauma, which has led to speculation that it could be a gladiator burial site. This specific skeleton has a series of depressions on the pelvis, which had previously been suggested as possible evidence of carnivore bites. By creating a three-dimensional scan of these marks, the researchers on this new study could compare these marks to bites from a variety of different animals.

They determined that these marks were likely bite marks from a large cat, possibly a lion. Since they were on the pelvis, they note it’s possible that these bites came as a result of the lion scavenging on the body around the time of death.

This skeleton is the first direct, physical evidence of human-animal combat from Europe during the Roman Empire. By demonstrating the possibility of gladiatorial combat or similar spectacles in modern York, this finding also gives archaeologists and historians new insight into the life and history of Roman-era England.

Lead author Prof. Tim Thompson, of Maynooth University, adds: "The implications of our multidisciplinary study are huge. Here we have physical evidence for the spectacle of the Roman Empire and the dangerous gladiatorial combat on show. This provides new evidence to support our understanding of the past."

Co-author Dr. John Pearce, of King's College London, adds: "As tangible witnesses to spectacles in Britain's Roman amphitheatres, the bitemarks help us appreciate these spaces as settings for brutal demonstrations of power. They make an important contribution to desanitizing our Roman past."   

David Jennings, CEO of York Archaeology, adds: “One of the wonderful things about archaeology is that we continue to make discoveries even years after a dig has concluded, as research methods and technology enable us to explore the past in more detail; it is now 20 years since we unearthed 80 burials at Driffield Terrace. This latest research gives us a remarkable insight into the life – and death – of this particular individual, and adds to both previous and ongoing genome research into the origins of some of the men buried in this particular Roman cemetery. We may never know what brought this man to the arena where we believe he may have been fighting for the entertainment of others, but it is remarkable that the first osteo-archaeological evidence for this kind of gladiatorial combat has been found so far from the Colosseum of Rome, which would have been the classical world’s Wembley Stadium of combat.”

  

Puncture injury from leopard feeding.

Credit

Thompson et al., 2025, PLOS One, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttps://plos.io/4jpsL5

Citation: Thompson TJU, Errickson D, McDonnell C, Holst M, Caffell A, Pearce J, et al. (2025) Unique osteological evidence for human-animal gladiatorial combat in Roman Britain. PLoS ONE 20(4): e0319847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319847

Author countries: Ireland, U.K.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

 

Italians spent thousands of years perfecting grape cultivation



Ancient grape seeds show gradual domestication from Bronze Age to Medieval Period



PLOS

Tracing the emergence of domesticated grapevine in Italy 

image: 

The domestication of grapevine was a slow process in Italy, according to the study.

view more 

Credit: Jill Wellington, Pexels, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)





The domestication of grapevine was a slow process in Italy, taking place over thousands of years, according to a study published April 23, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS One by Mariano Ucchesu of the University of Montpellier, France and colleagues.

Each year, worldwide grape cultivation produces roughly 80 million tons of fresh grapes and 26 billion liters of wine, with Italian wine featuring prominently. While the deep history of viticulture is well-studied in parts of Asia and Europe, data is lacking in the western Mediterranean region. In this study, Ucchesu and colleagues analyzed more than 1,700 grape seeds from 25 archaeological sites in and around Italy spanning seven millennia from the Neolithic Period to the Medieval Period.

Morphological analysis revealed that in sites older than 1000 BC, nearly all of the grape seeds share the size and proportions of modern wild grapevine, suggesting that these fruits were gathered from the wild. Then, from roughly 1000 BC to 600 AD, the majority of grape seeds are more akin to modern domesticated varieties, although there is considerable variation in seed size and proportions, as well as the ratio of domestic to wild grapes from site to site. And in sites from the Medieval Period, starting around 700 AD, domestic grape seeds are abundant and highly similar to modern cultivated grapes.

These results indicate that grape cultivation in Italy likely began during the Late Bronze Age, followed by many centuries of gradual domestication, likely involving the mixing of wild and cultivated vines to produce new domestic varieties. The authors note that these results align with previous genetic and archaeological research, but stress the importance of future study at a wider variety of archaeological sites to fill in the picture of grape cultivation across the Mediterranean.

The authors add: “This research has made it possible, for the first time, to trace the history of the origins of viticulture in Italy. The appearance of the first domesticated grapes during the Bronze Age, in Italian archaeological contexts, points to a long-standing tradition of Italian wine heritage within the broader landscape of Western Europe.”

“This research was made possible thanks to funding received through the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Curie Fellowship (2021–2023 n. Agreement-101019563-VITALY) and supported by the ANR MICA project (grant agreement ANR-22-CE27-0026). The successful outcome of the research is also due to the valuable collaboration of the archaeobotanical colleagues from CNRS-ISEM in Montpellier and all the Italian colleagues who generously provided the archaeobotanical materials, valuable advice and suggestions for this research.”

 

 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttps://plos.io/3G9l44M

Citation: Ucchesu M, Ivorra S, Bonhomme V, Pastor T, Aranguren B, Bacchetta G, et al. (2025) Tracing the emergence of domesticated grapevine in Italy. PLoS ONE 20(4): e0321653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321653

Author countries: France, Italy, Spain

Funding: M.U. received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie SkÅ‚odowska-Curie grant agreement (No 101019563 –VITALY). L.B. and S.I. were supported by the ANR MICA project (grant agreement ANR-22-CE27-0026).

 

Most US school shooters grew up with guns as key part of social life, study suggests



New analysis of U.S. shootings finds all shooters easily accessed the firearms they used



PLOS

“The only friend I had was my gun”: A mixed-methods study of gun culture in school shootings 

image: 

Growing up with Guns. The figure shows three school shooters as children. To maintain anonymity and prevent the perpetrator from gaining notoriety, the images are sketches based on family photographs and include a black bar over the eyes. The figure is for illustrative purposes only [original photographs are documented in sources [51,52,53].

view more 

Credit: Nassauer, 2025, PLOS One, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)





A new analysis of school shootings in the U.S. suggests that most shooters had a social background in which guns were a key leisure item, with attached meanings of bonding and affection, which also translated into easy access to firearms. Anne Nassauer of the University of Erfurt, Germany, presents these findings in the open-access journal PLOS One on April 23, 2025.

For U.S. minors, guns are the leading cause of death. Some of these deaths occur in school shootings, where a current or former student fires at people at their school. Discussions of school shootings often cite the unique gun culture of the U.S. as a causative factor. However, few studies have methodically analyzed the role of gun culture in school shooters’ lives.

To address this gap, Nassauer analyzed all known U.S. school shootings across U.S. history (83 cases), some of which resulted in no deaths, some in a few deaths, and some in many. Using data from court, police, and media records, she assembled a case file for each shooter and conducted cross-case and statistical comparisons to determine whether any patterns in gun culture emerged.

The analysis suggests that a distinct pocket of U.S. gun culture plays a key role in school shooters’ lives. Specifically, most shooters in the study came from a social background in which guns were key leisure items that were often important for family bonding time, often from a young age. Some shooters described guns as being their “only friend” or the “love of [their] life.”

Notably, all shooters in the study faced no difficulty in obtaining the guns they used in the school shootings. The analysis suggests that this ease of access stemmed from the cultural meanings assigned to guns within the shooters’ social settings—namely, fun, bonding, and belonging—which translated into practices that made accessing guns easy. For instance, some parents had bought the guns their children then used for the school shooting, while others kept guns in easily accessible parts of their house.

The findings suggest that research on how to prevent school shootings could focus on making guns more difficult for students to access and on finding ways to foster student belonging.

The author adds: “All school shooters in U.S. history had easy access to the firearms they used — even those who were very young or severely mentally ill. Many came from a gun culture where firearms are symbols of affection, bonding, and identity. The weapons were often freely accessible in the shooters’ homes.”

“This study shows school shooters don’t just use guns, but many grow up in worlds where guns are central to identity and belonging. Gun culture isn’t just a backdrop — it’s a formative part of many school shooters’ lives. For many school shooters guns were what they called their ‘only friend’, or ‘the love of their life’. We can't understand school shootings without understanding how gun culture shapes youth identities and gun access.”

“Guns don’t cause school shootings, but they make them possible — and often far too easy. There’s not a single school shooting in the US where a shooter had trouble getting a firearm. So we have to ask: Why do only those with easy gun access do it? Are other potential shooters deterred because they don’t have a gun within easy reach?”




 In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttps://plos.io/3Raqjne

Citation: Nassauer A (2025) “The only friend I had was my gun”: A mixed-methods study of gun culture in school shootings. PLoS ONE 20(4): e0322195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322195

Author countries: Germany

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.