Friday, May 02, 2025

 

‘Scratching’ more than the ocean’s surface to map global microplastic movement



FAU joins first-ever global effort to map microplastics’ path through critical ocean systems



Florida Atlantic University

FAU Joins First-ever Global Effort to Map Microplastics’ Path Through Critical Ocean Systems 

image: 

Tracy Mincer, Ph.D., co-author and an associate professor of biology and biochemistry in FAU’s Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College.   

view more 

Credit: Florida Atlantic University





Marine plastic pollution is a global crisis, with 9 to 14 million metric tons of plastic entering the ocean every year. Tiny fragments called microplastics – ranging from 1 micron to 5 millimeters – make up the vast majority of plastic pieces found and pose serious risks to ocean health.

Most research has focused on surface waters, usually sampling just the top 15 to 50 centimeters using net tows. However, microplastics come in many forms with different properties, influencing how they move and interact with their surroundings.

A researcher from Florida Atlantic University is among an international team of scientists who has moved beyond just “scratching the surface,” marking a turning point in our understanding of how microplastics move through and impact the global ocean.

For the first time, scientists have mapped microplastic distribution from the surface to the deep sea at a global scale – revealing not only where plastics accumulate, but how they infiltrate critical ocean systems. For the study, researchers synthesized depth-profile data from 1,885 stations collected between 2014 and 2024 to map microplastic distribution patterns by size and polymer type, while also evaluating potential transport mechanisms.  

Results, published in Nature, reveal that microplastics are not just surface pollutants – they’re deeply embedded in the ocean’s structure. Ranging from a few to thousands of particles per cubic meter, their size determines how they move: smaller microplastics (1 to 100 micrometers) spread more evenly and penetrate deeper, while larger ones (100 to 5,000 micrometers) concentrate near the surface, especially within the top 100 meters of gyres. Gyres act like massive, slow-moving whirlpools that trap and concentrate floating debris – especially plastic.  

Strikingly, microplastics are becoming a measurable part of the ocean’s carbon cycle, making up just 0.1% of carbon particles at 30 meters but rising to 5% at 2,000 meters. This suggests that microplastics are not only persistent pollutants but may also be altering key biogeochemical processes in the deep sea.

“Microplastics are not just floating at the surface – they’re deeply embedded throughout the ocean, from coastal waters to the open sea,” said Tracy Mincer, Ph.D., co-author and an associate professor of biology and biochemistry in FAU’s Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College.   

Researchers identified more than 56 types of plastic polymers in their synthesized microplastic dataset. While buoyant plastics dominate overall, denser microplastics are more prevalent offshore – likely because they fragment more readily. Dense polymers become brittle and break down faster, particularly after prolonged exposure to environmental weathering. These small, persistent particles – often originating from fishing gear and containers like polyester bottles – can remain in the ocean for decades.

Polypropylene, commonly found in items like yogurt containers and rope, photodegrades more quickly than polyethylene, which is used in plastic bags and water bottles. This may account for its lower abundance in offshore waters. Nonetheless, significant uncertainties remain in subsurface microplastic data due to inconsistent sampling techniques and limited coverage, highlighting the need for specialized equipment and greater collaboration to improve data reliability.

The ocean’s water column – the largest habitat on Earth – plays a crucial role in global carbon cycling, supporting half of the planet’s primary production and absorbing human-made CO₂. As microplastics move through this vast space, they interact with natural particles and processes, potentially affecting how the ocean functions.

“Our findings suggest microplastics are becoming a measurable part of the ocean’s carbon cycle, with potential consequences for climate regulation and marine food webs,” said Mincer. “This work sets the stage for taking the next steps in understanding the residence time of plastic in the interior of the ocean.”

 The study was led by the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology in collaboration with FAU; Aotearoa Blue Ocean Research in New Zealand; Northeastern University; East China Normal University; NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, The Netherlands; The Ocean Cleanup, The Netherlands; Egger Research and Consulting, Switzerland; University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center; Harvard University; University of Siena, Italy; and the National Biodiversity Future Center, Italy.   

Several authors were FAU researchers in the Mincer lab including Luisa Galgani, Ph.D., who served as a Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellow and is now faculty at the University of Siena; Ryan Bos, Ph.D., who was a Ph.D. student in the integrative biology program at FAU and is now a postdoc at Harvard; and Shiye Zhao, Ph.D., the lead author, who was an FAU postdoc for several years and is now tenured faculty at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.

- FAU -

 

About Florida Atlantic University:
Florida Atlantic University, established in 1961, officially opened its doors in 1964 as the fifth public university in Florida. Today, Florida Atlantic serves more than 30,000 undergraduate and graduate students across six campuses located along the Southeast Florida coast. In recent years, the University has doubled its research expenditures and outpaced its peers in student achievement rates. Through the coexistence of access and excellence, Florida Atlantic embodies an innovative model where traditional achievement gaps vanish. Florida Atlantic is designated as a Hispanic-serving institution, ranked as a top public university by U.S. News & World Report, and holds the designation of “R1: Very High Research Spending and Doctorate Production” by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Florida Atlantic shares this status with less than 5% of the nearly 4,000 universities in the United States. For more information, visit www.fau.edu.

 

 

Oceans are heating faster in two bands stretching around globe




Countries affected include the US, Japan, Argentina, New Zealand


University of Auckland

Dr Kevin Trenberth 

image: 

Dr Kevin Trenberth

view more 

Credit: Photo: Chris Loufte/University of Auckland




The world’s oceans are heating faster in two bands stretching around the globe, one in the southern hemisphere and one in the north, according to new research led by climate scientist Dr Kevin Trenberth.

In both hemispheres, the areas are near 40 degrees latitude.

The first band at 40 to 45 degrees south is heating at the world’s fastest pace, with the effect especially pronounced around New Zealand, Tasmania, and Atlantic waters east of Argentina. 

The second band is around 40 degrees north, with the biggest effects in waters east of the United States in the North Atlantic and east of Japan in the North Pacific.

“This is very striking,” says Trenberth, of the University of Auckland and the National Center of Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado. “It’s unusual to discover such a distinctive pattern jumping out from climate data,” he says.  

Ocean heating upsets marine ecosystems, increases atmospheric levels of water vapour, which is a powerful greenhouse gas, and fuels rain-storms and extreme weather.

The heat bands have developed since 2005 in tandem with poleward shifts in the jet stream, the powerful winds above the Earth’s surface that blow from west to east, and corresponding shifts in ocean currents, according to Trenberth and his co-authors in the Journal of Climate.

The scientists processed an “unprecedented” volume of atmospheric and ocean data to assess 1 degree latitude strips of ocean to a depth of 2000m for the period from 2000 to 2023, Trenberth says. Changes in heat content, measured in zettajoules, were compared with a 2000-04 baseline. 

Besides the two key zones, sizeable increases in heat took place in the area from 10 degrees north to 20 degrees south, which includes much of the tropics. However, the effect was less distinct because of variations caused by the El Niño-Southern Oscillation climate pattern, Trenberth says.  

“What is unusual is the absence of warming in the subtropics, near 20 degrees latitude, in both hemispheres,” he says. 

Co-authors of the paper were Lijing Cheng and Yuying Pan, of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, John Fasullo of NCAR, and Michael Mayer of the University of Vienna and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts.

“Despite what Donald Trump thinks, the climate is changing because of the build-up of greenhouse gases, and most of the extra heat ends up in the ocean,” says Trenberth. “However, the results are by no means uniform, as this research shows. Natural variability is likely also at play."

 

When sea stars fall, sea otters rise: Monterey Bay Aquarium research reveals sea otters benefit from prey boom triggered by loss of ochre sea stars



Study shows the importance of keystone predators in connected ecosystems



Monterey Bay Aquarium

Fig.6 sea otter mussel foraging 

image: 

Monterey Bay Aquarium led reserach published in the journal Science Advances shows that a mass die-off of ochre sea stars (often called Pisaster ochraceus) due to a sea star wasting event created a mussel boom – offering sea otters an unexpected prey buffet.

view more 

Credit: Monterey Bay Aquarium





New research led by Monterey Bay Aquarium reveals a surprising ripple effect in coastal ecosystems: the collapse of one marine predator can benefit another. Published today in the journal Science Advances, the study shows that a mass die-off of ochre sea stars (often called Pisaster ochraceus) due to a sea star wasting event created a mussel boom – offering sea otters an unexpected prey buffet.

“Our research shows that the loss of a predator in one ecosystem can send shockwaves into another,” said lead author Dr. Joshua Smith, a research scientist at Monterey Bay Aquarium. “It’s an example of how ecosystems are connected through keystone predation in ways that we haven't understood before.”

In 2013, a sea star wasting syndrome decimated populations of Pisaster along the west coast of North America and along the Monterey Peninsula in California, where this study was conducted. The orange and purple stars have a hungry appetite for mussels in the rocky intertidal. Without the voracious sea stars lurking around, mussel populations exploded, expanding in cover from around five percent to more than 18 percent within three years. In the wake of the sea star die-off, mussels became a major prey surplus for sea otters, revealing a surprising link between the adjacent rocky intertidal and kelp forest ecosystems. The new research into the phenomenon shows how the loss of a keystone predator (Pisaster) in one ecosystem can impart changes to another (sea otters), linking ecosystems.

Mussel bonanza benefits sea otters

Monterey Bay Aquarium researchers have been observing sea otter foraging behavior for decades. Sea otters consume their prey at the surface, which is key to recording what they eat and where they forage. Following the loss of Pisaster, sea otters more than doubled their mussel consumption, increasing from less than seven percent to nearly 18 percent of their overall diet. The local number of sea otters also increased from a decade average (2000-2012) of 373 to 535 during 2014-2024, and the prey surplus supported the increased numbers.

Increases in mussel consumption by sea otters in the rocky intertidal were documented by the Multi-Agency Rocky Intertidal Network (MARINe) – a consortium of organizations that conduct long-term ecosystem monitoring. The MARINe group sampled four locations over several decades in the rocky intertidal along the Monterey Peninsula. For each survey, they recorded information on the number of sea stars, the cover of mussels, and how far the mussel beds extended from the upper intertidal toward the water.

“The long-term monitoring data collected by MARINe were really key to cinching the correlation between the decline in sea stars and the increase in mussels,” Smith said. “The 2013 sea star wasting event was so abrupt. By late 2013 the local population of stars had nearly collapsed.”

“Predators like sea stars and sea otters are essential to maintaining resilient ecosystems. When these predators are removed, everything crumbles,” Smith said. “Our findings reveal what we are calling ‘keystone interdependence’ – where the loss of a predator in one ecosystem doesn’t just affect that particular ecosystem, it also extends to adjacent ecosystems, even benefiting other predators.”

From prey surplus to ecological uncertainty

Although sea otters thrived in response to increased availability of mussels, researchers caution this might only be temporary. With mussels now reaching sizes that are too large for sea stars to consume, a return to the previous balance may be slow – even after Pisaster recovers. Researchers hypothesize that sea otters might shift their diets once again, after they deplete the overabundance of large mussels and after Pisaster eventually recovers.

The study also highlights how climate change compounds the effects of ecosystem shifts. Shortly before the mussel population increase, the largest marine heatwave on record occurred in the northeast Pacific Ocean from 2014-2016. In the sweltering sea temperatures, kelp forests declined, kelp-eating sea urchin numbers exploded, and sea otters shifted their diet toward sea urchins. Later, the sea otters pivoted again – this time toward mussels as this prey surplus became available in the rocky intertidal. 

Predator diversity increases resilience

This study highlights the importance of conservation that considers ecosystems and habitats as being fundamentally connected systems.

“Conservation efforts rarely consider how adjacent ecosystems are connected,” said Dr. April Ridlon, co-author of the paper and aquarium director of U.S. and California science. “The findings of this study show that predators are important for enabling ecological resilience, and that when predators decline in one ecosystem, the consequences may be manifest in another.” 

With climate extremes like marine heatwaves on the rise, understanding how changes in one ecosystem impact another is central to developing effective conservation strategies. 

“Predators like sea stars and sea otters are essential to maintaining resilient ecosystems,” said co-author and aquarium Senior Sea Otter Biologist Leilani Konrad. “Our findings of keystone interdependence reveal that conservation of predators in one ecosystem can enhance resilience that transcends ecosystems and protects biodiversity.”

About Monterey Bay Aquarium

With a mission to inspire conservation of the ocean, the Monterey Bay Aquarium is the most admired aquarium in the United States, a leader in science education, and a voice for ocean conservation through comprehensive programs in marine science and public policy. Everything we do works in concert to protect the future of our blue planet. More information at MontereyBayAquarium.org.


A Southern sea otter foraging and eating mussels in Monterey Bay. Research led by Monterey Bay Aquarium published in the journal Science Advances shows that a mass die-off of ochre sea stars (often called Pisaster ochraceus) due to a sea star wasting event created a mussel boom – offering sea otters an unexpected prey buffet.


 

Home washing machines fail to remove important pathogens from textiles



Study finds washing machine biofilms may harbor potential pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes, which could have an impact on domestic laundering of healthcare workers uniforms




PLOS

Domestic laundering of healthcare textiles: Disinfection efficacy and risks of antibiotic resistance transmission 

image: 

Pre- and post-domestic laundering of bacteria contaminated textiles.

view more 

Credit: Dr. Caroline Cayrou, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)




Healthcare workers who wash their uniforms at home may be unknowingly contributing to the spread of antibiotic-resistant infections in hospitals, according to a new study led by Katie Laird of De Montfort University, published April 30, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS One.

Hospital-acquired infections are a major public health concern, in part because they frequently involve antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Many nurses and healthcare workers clean their uniforms at home in standard washing machines, but some studies have found that bacteria can be transmitted through clothing, raising the question of whether these machines can sufficiently prevent the spread of dangerous microbes.

In the new study, researchers evaluated whether six models of home washing machine successfully decontaminated healthcare worker uniforms, by washing contaminated fabric swatches in hot water, using a rapid or normal cycle. Half of the machines did not disinfect the clothing during a rapid cycle, while one third failed to clean sufficiently during the standard cycle.

The team also sampled biofilms from inside 12 washing machines. DNA sequencing revealed the presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes. Investigations also showed that bacteria can develop resistance to domestic detergent, which also increased their resistance to certain antibiotics.

Together, the findings suggest that many home washing machines may be insufficient for decontaminating healthcare worker uniforms, and may be contributing to the spread of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic resistance. The researchers propose that the laundering guidelines given to healthcare workers should be revised to ensure that home washing machines are cleaning effectively. Alternatively, healthcare facilities could use on-site industrial machines to launder uniforms to improve patient safety and control the spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

The authors add: “Our research shows that domestic washing machines often fail to disinfect textiles, allowing antibiotic-resistant bacteria to survive. If we’re serious about transmission of infectious disease via textiles and tackling antimicrobial resistance, we must rethink how we launder what our healthcare workers wear.”

 

 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttps://plos.io/4jaHqBz

Citation: Cayrou C, Silver K, Owen L, Dunlop J, Laird K (2025) Domestic laundering of healthcare textiles: Disinfection efficacy and risks of antibiotic resistance transmission. PLoS ONE 20(4): e0321467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321467

Author countries: U.K.

Funding: This research was funded by De Montfort University and the Textile Services Association.

 

Conservatives may self-rate as having better “mental health” because of stigma around the term



When conservatives rated “mood” instead of “mental health”, ideological gaps in ratings disappeared




PLOS

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? 

image: 

Distribution of self-assessments for Conservatives, Moderates, and Liberals based on experimental condition.

view more 

Credit: Schaffner et al., 2025, PLOS One, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)




Conservatives may rate their mental health more positively than liberals in part because of stigma around the phrase “mental health,” according to a study published April 30, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS One by Brian F. Schaffner from Tufts University, U.S., and colleagues.

In the United States, a number of studies have found that conservatives rate themselves as being happier and having better mental health than their liberal counterparts. But it is unclear what causes this happiness gap. The difference could be a product of the correlation between conservatism and traits associated with mental health such as religious faith, patriotism, marriage, higher incomes, and old age, but could alternatively reflect differing ideas about the state of the world, or different attitudes to the concept of mental health.

To better understand the size and cause of this happiness gap, the authors of the study used a representative survey of 60,000 American adults from the 2022 Cooperative Election Study survey. They asked subjects about their mental health, their political ideology, and their demographics—including age, home ownership, marital status, and more. In the 2023 Cooperative Election Study survey, the scientists surveyed 1,000 American adults, Half were asked the same 2022 questions, while the other half were asked to rate their “mood” as opposed to their mental health.

In the 2022 survey, conservatives rated themselves on average 19 points higher for mental health than liberals. Once positive mental health traits like age, marital status, and church attendance were accounted for, the gap reduced by 40 percent, to 11 points. In the 2023 survey, when respondents were asked to rate their “overall mood” instead of their “mental health,” the remaining differences disappeared. The 64 percent of highly positive ratings of “mental health” for conservatives dropped to 49 percent for “overall mood”. In contrast, while 29 percent of liberals rated their “mental health” as fair or poor, only 17 percent rated their “overall mood” the same way.

The authors suggest that stigma for conservatives around the phrase “mental health” might contribute to the gap, while the negative mental health ratings by liberals might reflect increased awareness of mental health issues. The happiness gap, the authors note, may be dependent on which term is used to measure it.

The authors add: “There has been a lot of discussion about the notion that Conservatives are happier and have better mental well-being than Liberals, but we wanted to really test how true this is. What our experiment shows is that it really depends what you ask about. Yes, Conservatives report that their mental health is better than Liberals do, but that gap disappears entirely when we ask instead about each group's overall mood. The ideological gap in mental well-being is clearly not as straightforward or consistent as it is often made out to be.”

“The idea for this project came from discussions with the three student coauthors who had been exposed to this claim that conservatives are happier than liberals in another class that they were taking at the time. We wanted to test how true that pattern was and what we ended up finding was that the ideological gap in mental well-being is not nearly as clear cut as it is often made out to be.”

 

 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttps://plos.io/3Yv4FOn

Citation: Schaffner BF, Hershewe T, Kava Z, Strell J (2025) Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? PLoS ONE 20(4): e0321573. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321573

Author countries: U.S.

Funding: BFS received support from the National Science Foundation (award # 2148907) and Tufts University. The sponsors did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.