Friday, May 02, 2025

 

Geobiology: Iron, sulfur, heat – and first life




Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München





The very first cells obtained their energy from geochemical reactions. LMU researchers have now managed to recreate this ancient metabolic process in their laboratory.

Most likely, the earliest ancestor of all life on Earth liked warm conditions, lived off hydrogen, and produced methane.  LMU researchers have come to this conclusion based on fossil evidence and metabolic reconstructions using genetic analyses. This relatively simple, primordial acetyl-CoA metabolic pathway has survived in many microorganisms to this day.

 

To discover more about the metabolism of what were probably amongst the very first living organisms on Earth, a team of LMU researchers led by Professor William Orsi from the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences created laboratory simulations of the conditions on the young Earth some 4 to 3.6 billion years ago. These conditions had some similarities to those prevailing today in the hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor known as “black smokers”, with a key difference being that the ancient oceans were full of dissolved iron.

 

Strong growth without any nutrients

In the laboratory experiment, the researchers produced miniature versions of such “black smokers.” As it happens naturally at the seafloor, iron and sulfur geochemical reactions took place at high temperatures, forming iron sulfide minerals such as mackinawite (FeS) and greigite (Fe3S4) in a process that produced hydrogen gas (H2). In these “chemical gardens,” the single-celled archaean Methanocaldococcus jannaschii was not only able to thrive, but positively exceeded the expectations of the researchers: “As well as overexpressing some genes of the acetyl-CoA metabolism, the archaeans actually grew exponentially,” explains Vanessa Helmbrecht, lead author of the study, which has now been published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution. “At the beginning, we expected only slight growth, as we did not add any extra nutrients, vitamins, or trace metals to the experiment.” The single-celled organism thus proved highly adept at utilizing the hydrogen gas produced by the abiotic precipitation of iron sulfides as an energy source.

 

Isolated from the sediment of hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor, the hyperthermophile microbe Methanocaldococcus jannaschii serves as a model organism for methanogenesis via the Acetyl-CoA metabolic pathway. It is an organism that is adapted to extreme conditions: “For the cultivation, we were given access to the state-of-the-art facilities in the Archaea Center at the University of Regensburg, where Professor Dina Grohmann and Dr. Robert Reichelt kindly supported us. This was very important for preparing the experiments in the chemical gardens,” says William Orsi.

 

Oldest metabolic process in evolutionary history

In the chemical gardens, the cells always remained in direct proximity to the mackinawite particles. This aligns with fossil evidence, where some geological deposits of such minerals from the early history of the Earth contain fossil traces of the first microbial life.

 

The researchers conclude from the study’s results that chemical reactions during the precipitation of iron sulfide minerals around four billion years ago generated sufficient energy for the survival of the very first cells and thus laid the foundations for the hydrogen-dependent metabolism of the first microbes on the young Earth. Accordingly, this form of methanogenesis based on hydrogen produced inorganically through chemical reactions is the oldest known form of energy generation in evolutionary history.

 

Space – the next frontier

The LMU geobiologists are now asking the question as to whether the metabolic processes they observed might not also take place outside our planet, and therefore whether there could be extraterrestrial habitats for archaeans – such as on Enceladus. NASA already treats this moon of Saturn as a candidate for possible life, because scientists suspect the presence of hydrothermal activities between its rocky core and a liquid ‘soda ocean’ beneath its icy crust. “In our next study, we will simulate the conditions of Enceladus in the lab and test whether archaeans are capable of surviving and growing there,” says Helmbrecht.

 

Landmark experiment sheds new light on the origins of consciousness



Findings suggest it may be about sensory processing and perception, with possible implications for diagnosing and treating comas or vegetative states




Allen Institute

Adversarial Collaboration Meeting 

image: 

A group photo from the original meeting in March 2018 at the Allen Institute in Seattle, WA, that kicked off the set of adversarial collaborations. 

view more 

Credit: Allen Institute




Seattle, WASH.—April 30, 2025—An experiment seven years in the making has uncovered new insights into the nature of consciousness and challenges two prominent, competing scientific theories: Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT). The findings were published today in Nature and mark a pivotal moment in the goal to understand the elusive origins consciousness. 

IIT suggests that consciousness emerges when information inside a system (like the brain) is highly connected and unified, for as long as the information is consciously perceived, acting as a single whole. On the other hand, GNWT suggests a network of brain areas will spotlight important pieces of information in the brain—bringing it to the forefront of our minds—broadcasting it widely the moment it enters consciousness, and this produces conscious experience. The two competing theories were tested against one another in 2019 in a collaborative experiment involving 256 human subjects, and the findings were just released. 

“Adversarial collaboration fits within the Allen Institute’s mission of team science, open science and big science, in service of one of the biggest, and most long-standing, intellectual challenges of humanity: the Mind-Body Problem,” said Christof Koch, Ph.D., meritorious investigator at the Allen Institute. “Unravelling this mystery is the passion of my entire life.” 

The Findings 

Research showed that there’s functional connection between neurons in early visual areas of the brain (the areas that process vision, which are at the back of the brain) and the frontal areas of the brain, helping us understand how our perceptions tie to our thoughts. The findings de-emphasize the importance of the prefrontal cortex in consciousness, suggesting that while it’s important for reasoning and planning, consciousness itself may be linked with sensory processing and perception. In other words, intelligence is about doing while consciousness is about being. 
 
This discovery has implications for how we understand consciousness and may shed light on disorders of consciousness such as comas or vegetative states. Identifying where consciousness comes from could help detect “covert consciousness” in unresponsive patients with severe injuries—a condition known to occur in about one-quarter of cases as reported in the New England Journal of Medicine last year. 

Neither Theory Came Out on Top  

Integrated Information Theory (IIT) says consciousness comes from the interaction and cooperation of various parts of the brain as they work together to integrate information, like teamwork. It arises from how these parts are connected and how they share information with each other rather than any one individual area or part of the brain generating consciousness. The study, however, did not find enough lasting connections in the back of the brain to support this idea. Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT) supports the idea that consciousness happens in the front of the brain, but the study didn’t find enough support for this idea either. 

“It was clear that no single experiment would decisively refute either theory. The theories are just too different in their assumptions and explanatory goals, and the available experimental methods too coarse, to enable one theory to conclusively win out over another,” said Anil Seth, Ph.D., a professor of cognitive and computational neuroscience at the University of Sussex. “Having said all this, the findings of the collaboration remain extremely valuable – much has been learned about both theories and about where and when in the brain information about visual experience can be decoded from. 

The study involved 256 subjects, which is unprecedented for this kind of experiment. Researchers showed them various visual stimuli and then used three common human brain measurement tools that track blood flow as well as magnetic and electrical activity to study their brains while they looked at the stimuli. 

The highly collaborative experiment is the result of a large-scale, open science collaboration that began at a workshop at the Allen Institute in 2018. This innovative approach brought together researchers with differing perspectives to test two theories in a collaborative, yet critical, environment aimed at reducing confirmation bias and accelerating scientific progress. 

“Adversarial collaborations are a powerful social process, little used because of its challenging nature, within any field that has competing theories,” said Koch. “The bio-medical field could hugely profit by ‘friendly’ competition among theories—neurobiological or others. But it requires a great deal of cooperation and work.” 

About the Allen Institute 

The Allen Institute is an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit research organization founded by philanthropist and visionary, the late Paul G. Allen. The Allen Institute is dedicated to answering some of the biggest questions in bioscience and accelerating research worldwide. The Institute is a recognized leader in large-scale research with a commitment to an open science model. Its research institutes and programs include the Allen Institute for Brain Science, launched in 2003; the Allen Institute for Cell Science, launched in 2014; the Allen Institute for Immunology, launched in 2018; and the Allen Institute for Neural Dynamics, launched in 2021. In 2016, the Allen Institute expanded its reach with the launch of The Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group, which identifies pioneers with new ideas to expand the boundaries of knowledge and make the world better. For more information, visit alleninstitute.org. 

 

Media Contact 

Liz Dueweke Media Relations 

206-225-0596 | liz.dueweke@alleninstitute.org 

 

 

Wildfire smoke exposure and cause-specific hospitalization in older adults



JAMA Network Open





About The Study: Exposure to high levels of smoke pollution was associated with an increase in hospitalizations for respiratory diseases in this cohort study. These findings underscore the need for interventions to mitigate the health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure.

Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Rachel C. Nethery, PhD, email rnethery@hsph.harvard.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7956)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article This link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7956?guestAccessKey=c0957767-f5eb-4d6d-88a4-15c747418b57&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=043025

About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is an online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. On weekdays, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication. 

 

In two decades increasing urban vegetation could have saved over 1.1 million lives



Increasing urban vegetation by 30% could save over one-third of all heat related deaths



Monash University

Professor Yuming Guo, lead author 

image: 

Professor Yuming Guo

view more 

Credit: Monash University





Increasing urban vegetation by 30% could save over one-third of all heat related deaths, saving up to 1.16 million lives globally from 2000 to 2019 according to a 20-year modelling study of the impact of increasing greenness in more than 11,000 urban areas.

The study, led by Monash University Professor Yuming Guo and published in The Lancet Planetary Health, showed that increasing vegetation levels by 10%, 20%, and 30% would:

decrease the global population-weighted warm-season mean temperature by 0.08°C, 0.14°C, and 0.19°C, respectively.

could prevent 0.86, 1.02, and 1.16 million deaths, respectively, representing 27.16%, 32.22%, and 36.66% of all heat-related deaths from 2000 to 2019.

The impact on lives of increasing urban vegetation is impacted by different climate types, greenness levels, socioeconomic statuses, and demographic characteristics

Urban areas in Southern Asia, Eastern Europe, and Eastern Asia have the greatest reduction in heat-related deaths.

The study aimed to detect the potential reduction in global heat-related deaths by increasing greenness in the warm season from 2000 to 2019 in 11,534 urban areas. Heat-mortality associations were assessed by using data from 830 locations in 53 countries and extrapolated to each urban centre.

While increasing greenness has been proposed as a heat-related death mitigation strategy, according to Professor Guo, “this is the first modelling study to estimate both the cooling and modifying effects of greenness, providing a more comprehensive assessment of its benefits in mitigating heat-related mortality,” he said.

“These findings indicate that preserving and expanding greenness might be potential strategies to lower temperature and mitigate the health impacts of heat exposure.”

Heat exposure is a major public health threat and is increasing due to climate change. Between 2000–2019, heat exposure was associated with 0.5 million deaths per year, accounting for 0.91% of global mortality. According to Professor Guo, estimates of heat-related deaths are projected to range from 2.5% in North Europe to 16.7% in South-East Asia during 2090-99, “under the most extreme global warming scenarios.”

Studies show that greenness has a cooling effect on temperature, via shading surfaces, deflecting radiation from the sun, and evapotranspiration (evaporation from both the ground and plants) which promotes air convection. This, in turn, cools the ambient temperature leading to a decrease in population heat exposure, thereby reducing the heat-related mortality burden.

According to Professor Guo there is emerging evidence has also shown that greenness could modify the heat-related mortality risk, potentially related to factors such as mental health, social engagement, physical activity, and air pollution.

The researchers used data from the Multi-Country Multi-City (MCC) Collaborative Research Network (http://mccstudy.lshtm.ac.uk/) which was developed in 2014 to look at population-wide associations between environmental stressors, climate, and health across countries and regions.  In this study, daily mortality and weather variables were extracted from 830 locations in 53 countries . Greenness was measured via the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), a satellite-based vegetation index derived from images collected by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Terra satellite. An “urban area” was defined as an area with a density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per km2 of permanent land and a total population of over 50,000.

If the level of vegetation is increased by 30% the average number of lives saved from 2000 to 2019 by region is:

Europe – 396,955

North America – 69,306

Latin American and the Caribbean – 123,085

Africa – 35,853

Asia – 527,989

Oceania – 2,733

Australia and New Zealand – 2,759

Mindfulness therapy reduces opioid craving and addiction, study finds



Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement restores the brain’s ability to savor natural healthy rewards in people addicted to opioids



University of California - San Diego

Eric Garland 

image: 

Eric Garland, Ph.D., professor of psychiatry at UC San Diego School of Medicine and endowed professor at the Sanford Institute for Empathy and Compassion

view more 

Credit: Kyle Dykes/UC San Diego Health Sciences Communications




Researchers from the University of California San Diego have found that Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) can help rewire the brain’s response to natural healthy pleasure, leading to improved mood, greater attention to positive experiences and reduced opioid cravings. The findings, published on April 30, 2025 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), suggest that this evidence-based therapy may be a promising tool in the fight against opioid use disorder (OUD).

Opioid addiction can develop when individuals misuse opioids originally prescribed for chronic pain, a condition affecting 50 million Americans each year, according to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. As people become increasingly dependent on opioids, they begin to lose the ability to feel joy and meaning in everyday life, driving them to seek higher doses to maintain a fleeting sense of well-being — a cycle that can lead to opioid addiction.

MORE, a program developed by Eric Garland, Ph.D., professor of psychiatry at UC San Diego School of Medicine and endowed professor at the Sanford Institute for Empathy and Compassion, is an evidence-based therapy that integrates mindfulness training, cognitive behavioral therapy and positive psychology techniques to address addiction, emotional distress and chronic pain simultaneously. MORE teaches mindfulness skills to regulate craving, relieve pain and recover the ability to savor natural healthy pleasure, joy and meaning in life.

The study included 160 individuals with chronic pain — both with and without OUD — recruited from primary care and pain clinics. Participants completed a positive emotion regulation (ER) task and questionnaires. A subsample of participants at risk for opioid misuse were randomized to one-on-one, eight weeks of MORE or supportive group therapy and then completed the ER task at posttreatment and questionnaires through 3-month follow-up.

Participants with OUD showed difficulty enhancing positive emotions, as seen in weakened brain responses when they tried to savor images representing naturally rewarding objects and experiences, such as smiling babies, puppies or a beautiful sunset. This blunting or numbing of positive emotions was directly linked to higher opioid cravings. However, the MORE therapy helped to heal this inability to savor by increasing brain responses to positive stimuli, which was associated with 50% lower opioid craving than standard group therapy. The results indicate that MORE could play a vital role in helping people with OUD regain control over their emotions and cravings, potentially reducing opioid misuse.

“Opioid addiction decreases the brain’s ability to experience natural healthy pleasure, driving increased cravings for the drug,” said Garland, the study’s lead author. “Our research shows that MORE helps restore this capacity, reducing cravings and potentially preventing opioid misuse.”

To date, MORE has been tested in over 10 randomized clinical trials involving more than 1,000 people. In the largest clinical trial involving 250 patients — published in JAMA Internal Medicine in early 2022 — MORE decreased opioid misuse by 45% at a 9-month follow-up, nearly tripling the effect of standard group therapy. In addition, 50% of patients treated with MORE reported clinically significant decreases in chronic pain. A 2023 study published in JAMA Psychiatry, showed that adding MORE to standard addictions care resulted in 42% less relapse and 59% less dropout from treatment when compared to standard addictions care alone.

Over the previous 20 years, Garland’s research and development of the MORE therapy has been supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). New research shows that for every $1 spent on MORE, there are $798 in estimated cost savings on the prevention of fatal overdoses, reduced health care costs, decreased criminal justice involvement and increased labor productivity. The lifetime economic impact of MORE is estimated to be $320,216 per person treated with MORE — a huge return-on-investment for society. 

“This study is a crucial step, but we need more large-scale and long-term research to fully understand how treatments like MORE can help heal the brain to enhance recovery from opioid addiction,” Garland added. “Multiple rigorous, well-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of the MORE therapy. It is now the right moment to partner with policymakers, healthcare organizations and administrators of the opioid legal settlement to disseminate this evidence-based treatment nationwide to help alleviate the opioid crisis.”

Link to full study.

Additional co-authors on the study include: Justin Hudak, Ph.D. from University of Utah; Adam W. Hanley, Ph.D. from Florida State University; Edward Bernat, Ph.D. from University of Maryland; and Brett Froeliger, Ph.D. from University of Missouri.

The study was funded, in part, by the NIH (R01DA042033, R01AT011772, R01DA056537, R01DA057631, R01DA058621).

Watch the full video, "Promising Tool Against Opioid Use Disorder."

# # #