Tuesday, May 27, 2025

 

Oldest whale bone tools discovered




Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Excavations in 2022 in the Basque cave of Isturitz, France 

image: 

 Excavations in 2022 in the Basque cave of Isturitz, France, where several dozen whale bone objects were discovered. Picture: Jean-Marc Pétillon 

Excavation director (to be credited): Christian Normand 

view more 

Credit: Picture: Jean-Marc Pétillon





Humans were making tools from whale bones as far back as 20,000 years ago, according to a study conducted by scientists from the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB), the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), and the University of British Columbia. This discovery broadens our understanding of early human use of whale remains and offers valuable insight into the marine ecology of the time. 

Whales, the largest animals on Earth, were an important source of food and materials such as oil and bone. For this reason, they are believed to have played a key role in the survival of many coastal human groups. However, tracing the origins of human-whale interactions is challenging, as coastal archaeological sites are especially fragile and vulnerable to rising sea levels, making it difficult to preserve evidence of early human-marine mammal relationships. 

 The research, led by Jean-Marc Pétillon (CNRS) along with ICTA-UAB scientist Krista McGrath and published in Nature Communications, analyzes 83 bone tools excavated from sites around the Bay of Biscay in Spain, along with 90 additional bones from Santa Catalina Cave, also located in the province of Biscay. The authors used mass spectrometry and radiocarbon dating to identify the species and age of the samples. 

“Our study reveals that the bones came from at least five species of large whales, the oldest of which date to approximately 19,000–20,000 years ago. These represent some of the earliest known evidence of humans using whale remains as tools”, says Jean-Marc Pétillon, senior author of the research. 

According to Krista McGrath, leading author of the paper, “ZooMS is a powerful technique for investigating past sea mammal diversity, particularly when diagnostic morphometric elements are missing from bone remains and objects, which is often the case for bone artefacts. We managed to identify species such as sperm whales, fin whales, blue whales, all still present in the Bay of Biscay today, as well as grey whales, a species now mostly restricted to the North Pacific and Arctic Oceans”. 

In addition, chemical data extracted from the bones suggest that the feeding habits of these ancient whales differed slightly from those of their modern counterparts, pointing to potential changes in behavior or the marine environment. Overall, this discovery not only enhances our understanding of early human use of whale remains but also sheds light on the role whales played in past ecosystems. 

January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires: A wake-up call as 'once-in-a-generation' events become frequent



United Nations University





RICHMOND HILL, CANADA – May 27, 2025 – A new publication by the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires: Once-in-a-Generation Events Now Happen Frequently, highlights the alarming trend of increasingly frequent and destructive urban wildfires, drawing critical lessons from the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires. These events, the Palisades and Eaton fires, collectively destroyed nearly 16,250 structures and directly exposed approximately 41,000 people, ranking them as the 2nd and 3rd most destructive wildfires in California's history, according to the analysis. 

The fires, which started on January 7, 2025, spread rapidly through urban areas of Los Angeles County, fueled by severe drought conditions and powerful Santa Ana winds. The rapid spread into densely populated areas resulted in 29 fatalities and widespread population displacement, underscoring the heightened risks posed by human development in wildfire-prone areas.  

" Our study highlights the low-survival rate of buildings in the January 2025 Los Angeles fires due to compounding impacts of climate-related and direct human factors" says Dr. Mojtaba Sadegh, Climate and Wildfire Analytics Lead at UNU-INWEH and lead author of the publication.   

The authors emphasize that while the burned areas were not exceptionally large, the significant portion impacting urban areas led to the high level of devastation. Key drivers identified include vegetation growth followed by dry conditions (hydroclimate whiplash), powerful Santa Ana winds, and human-caused ignitions during critical dry-hot-windy conditions. Climate change is noted for exacerbating these conditions. 

In response to these growing threats, the UNU-INWEH's incident analysis puts forth several critical recommendations, including prioritizing policies to decrease human-caused ignitions, especially during high-risk weather; promoting home hardening, defensible space, and community preparedness to protect communities in the Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI); encouraging ecologically appropriate vegetation management to reduce fuel loads; investing in advanced technologies for early detection, prediction, and suppression to enhance wildfire prediction and response; and implementing stricter zoning regulations and promoting fire-resilient design to strengthen land-use planning. 

"The investigation clearly tells us that disasters like the Los Angeles wildfires are multi-faceted. Analysts must be extremely careful and avoid introducing one single cause, such as climate change, bad management decisions, and poor response, for complex disasters like this," states Professor Kaveh Madani, Director of UNU-INWEH and a co-author of this publication. "Reductionist thinking leads to wrong policy advice and decisions," he adds. 

The analysis utilized satellite and population data to assess the impacts of wildfires, highlighting that working-age adults accounted for more than half of the direct exposures, followed by minors and older adults. The January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires serve as a stark reminder of the urgent need for proactive measures to protect vulnerable communities in an era of increasing extreme events. 

 

Read the Paper: Sadegh M, Seydi S. T., Abatzoglou J T, AghaKouchak A, Matin, M., Madani, K. (2025), January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires: Once-in-a-Generation Events Now Happen Frequently UNU Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada, doi: https://doi.org/10.53328/INR25MOS003 

 

The UNU research team is available for interviews: 

Dr. Mojtaba Sadegh, Lead, Climate and Wildfire Analytics, mojtaba.sadegh@unu.edu   

Dr. Mir Matin, Manager, Geospatial, Climate and Infrastructure Analytics Program, mir.matin@unu.edu  
Professor Kaveh Madani, Director, kaveh.madani@unu.edu  
  

Media Contacts 

Shooka Bidarian, Media and Journalism Fellow, Sustainability and Climate, shooka.bidarian@unu.edu 

Kyra Bowman, UNU Head of Communications, bowman@unu.edu   

DOI


New study analyzes air quality impacts of wildfire smoke



The comprehensive research examined air quality in Reno, Nevada during 106 wildfires to illuminate the atmospheric and public health impacts of smoke



Desert Research Institute

image1 

image: 

Satellite images helped the researchers distinguish smoky days (August 19 and 20, 2020) and average days (July 10, 2018) in Reno, Nevada. 

view more 

Credit: Lu et al., 2025/DRI





With wildfires increasing in frequency, severity, and size in the Western U.S., researchers are determined to better understand how smoke impacts air quality, public health, and even the weather. As fires burn, they release enormous amounts of aerosols — the vaporized remains of burning trees and homes that enter the atmosphere and the air we breathe. Now, a new study dissects these aerosols and gases to pinpoint their potential effects on our health as well as the planet’s short and long-term weather.  

The research, published in April's issue of Environmental Science: Atmospheres, measured air quality in Reno, Nevada over a 19 month period between 2017 and 2020 to capture both smoky and clear days. During this timeframe, smoke from more than 106 wildfires impacted the city’s air. DRI scientists Siying Lu and Andrey Khlystov led the research, which found increases in both fine aerosols (known as PM 2.5 for the size of the particulate matter) and carbon monoxide during smoky days. During the fire-prone late summer months analyzed during the study, wildfire smoke accounted for 56% to 65% of PM2.5 and 18% to 26% of carbon monoxide concentrations in Reno air. The results have implications for weather, cloud formation, and public health. 

“We know that Reno is frequently impacted by wildfires in summer, so we wanted to compare smoky and non-smoky days and measure the impacts on local air quality,” said Lu, who completed the research as part of her PhD work. “Although we focused on Reno for this study, we developed the method so that it can theoretically be applied anywhere.”  

The research team started on the roof of DRI’s Reno campus, where they set up equipment that could measure the size of atmospheric particles. This information is important because it determines how the particles interact with both the atmosphere and the human body. Larger particles can affect our upper respiratory tract, whereas fine aerosols can travel deeper into lungs. 

The researchers also collected data from a downtown Reno EPA air monitoring station that provided hourly concentrations of PM2.5, ozone, carbon monoxide, and other air pollutants. The data also provided concentrations of potassium, an element released by burning trees and other wood which can be used to confirm the presence of wildfire smoke in the air. 

The team further verified when air pollution was caused by wildfire smoke by using satellite images to identify visible smoke plumes and fire location information from NASA and NOAA. With an additional tool from NOAA, they could track Reno’s winds back in time to verify that they had indeed passed through a wildfire area. 

Wildfire aerosols have a complicated effect on the weather. On one hand, they can act as a filter to scatter and reflect incoming sunlight, creating a cooling effect. On the other hand, they contain light-absorbing material, such as soot and brown organic compounds, that can cause warming. Larger aerosols can promote cloud formation and duration by acting as nuclei for water vapor to condense around. The data showed that smoky days contained aerosols that are likely to act as cloud nuclei at concentrations up to 13 times higher than average.  

“We figured out that the size of particles is quite distinct during fires from a normal day in Reno, which has implications for cloud formation and how sunlight scatters, as well as public health,” said Khlystov, Research Professor of Chemistry at DRI. 

The study also found carbon monoxide present in higher concentrations during smoky days. Breathing high concentrations of carbon monoxide can reduce the ability of blood to carry oxygen to your brain and other organs.  

In contrast, concentrations of nitrogen oxides and ozone were present in Reno’s air at similar levels during both smoky and average days. They attribute this to their release by vehicle traffic and chemical reactions induced by sunlight.  

“Our research offers one of the most comprehensive looks at how wildfire smoke is affecting air quality in the Western U.S.,” Lu said.  

Lu is working on a machine-learning program to facilitate this kind of air quality research by automating the ability to identify when wildfire smoke is present in the air. This could potentially be used to build an automated app that can identify real-time smoke impacts by location and facilitate air quality research and public health messaging.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

More information: The full study, Particle size distributions of wildfire aerosols in the western USA, is available from Environmental Science: Atmospheres at https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00007F 

Study authors include: Siying Lu (DRI), Chiranjivi Bhattarai (DRI), Vera Samburova (DRI, UNR), and Andrey Khlystov (DRI) 


This map shows wildfires that affected Reno, NV, during the study period, with the size of each wildfire dot representing the area burned (km2). Concentric black circles radiate from Reno, NV, with each circle representing a 100 km increment from the city. Figure 1 from Lu et al., 2025.

Credit

Lu et al. 2025/DRI

About DRI 

We are Nevada’s non-profit research institute, founded in 1959 to empower experts to focus on science that matters. We work with communities across the state — and the world — to address their most pressing scientific questions. We’re proud that our scientists continuously produce solutions that better human and environmental health.   

Scientists at DRI are encouraged to follow their research interests across the traditional boundaries of scientific fields, collaborating across DRI and with scientists worldwide. All faculty support their own research through grants, bringing in nearly $5 to the Nevada economy for every $1 of state funds received. With more than 600 scientists, engineers, students, and staff across our Reno and Las Vegas campuses, we conducted more than $52 million in sponsored research focused on improving peoples’ lives in 2024 alone. 

At DRI, science isn’t merely academic — it’s the key to future-proofing our communities and building a better world. For more information, please visit www.dri.edu

 

Rapid simulations of toxic particles could aid air pollution fight





University of Edinburgh





A pioneering method to simulate how microscopic particles move through the air could boost efforts to combat air pollution, a study suggests.

Tiny particles found in exhaust fumes, wildfire smoke and other forms of airborne pollution are linked with serious health conditions such as stroke, heart disease and cancer, but predicting how they move is notoriously difficult, researchers say.

Now, scientists have developed a new computer modelling approach that dramatically improves the accuracy and efficiency of simulating how so-called nanoparticles behave in the air.

In practice, this could mean simulations that currently can take weeks to run could be completed in a matter of hours, the team says.

Better understanding the behaviour of these particles – which are small enough to bypass the body’s natural defences – could lead to more precise ways of monitoring air pollution, researchers say.

Using the UK’s national supercomputer ARCHER2, researchers from the Universities of Edinburgh and Warwick have created a method that allows a key factor governing how particles travel – known as the drag force – to be calculated up to 4,000 times faster than existing techniques.

At the heart of the team’s approach is a new way of modelling the way air flows around nanoparticles.

It involves a mathematical solution based on how air disturbances caused by nanoparticles fade with distance. When applied to the simulation, researchers can zoom in much closer to particles without compromising accuracy.

This differs from current methods, which involve simulating vast regions of surrounding air to mimic undisturbed air flow and require far more computing power, the team says. 

By enabling fast and precise simulations at the nanoscale, the new approach could help better predict how these particles will behave inside the body, the team says.

As well as potentially aiding the development of improved air pollution monitoring tools, the advance could also inform the design of nanoparticle-based technologies, such as lab-made particles for targeted drug delivery, the team adds.

The study, published in the Journal of Computational Physics, was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).

Lead author Dr Giorgos Tatsios, of the University of Edinburgh’s School of Engineering, said: “Airborne particles in the nanoscale range are some of the most harmful to human health – but also the hardest to model. Our method allows us to simulate their behaviour in complex flows far more efficiently, which is crucial for understanding where they go and how to mitigate their effects.”

Professor Duncan Lockerby, of the University of Warwick’s School of Engineering, said: “This approach could unlock new levels of accuracy in modelling how toxic particles move through the air – from city streets to human lungs – as well as how they behave in advanced sensors and cleanroom environments.”

 

Perfumes and lotions disrupt how body protects itself from indoor air pollutants



Penn State
air quality researcher at Penn State 

image: 

Donghyun Rim, associate professor of architectural engineering, gestures toward a test chamber to evaluate performance of low-cost air quality sensors. Rim studies the impact of human presence on indoor air quality and discovered reactions that impact indoor air quality. 

view more 

Credit: Jeff Xu/Penn State





UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Fragrances and lotions don't just change the way people smell, they actively alter the indoor air chemistry around the wearer, disrupting a critical natural process the body uses to protect itself from pollution, according to an international research team that includes scientists from Penn State.

The new study, published in the journal Science Advances, revealed that personal care products like perfumes and even unscented lotions alter the chemical composition of the “human oxidation field,” a natural protective air shield around a person’s breathing zone and skin.

The study suggests that the products disrupt how skin oils naturally react with indoor ozone to produce highly reactive hydroxyl (OH) radicals. Those radicals play a key role in forming an invisible chemical field around the person that protects them from ozone exposure, explained Donghyun Rim, associate professor of architectural engineering at Penn State and co-author on the study.

“Think of people as candlelight, our body temperature is typically the warmest thing in the indoor environment,” he said. “We're constantly pulling the air around us toward us, creating chemical reactions in the immediate area around our bodies — a phenomenon we call the human oxidation field. Our skin can absorb ozone, which is beneficial because it prevents us from inhaling ozone directly.”

But it may not be completely beneficial, he added. The process is complex: the initial reaction between skin and ozone that produces OH radicals triggers secondary reactions, releasing new chemicals into the air we breathe.

“We still don’t fully understand the impact of these byproducts,” Rim said. “But we’re working to understand it.”

People spend up to 90% of their time indoors, making indoor air quality a major factor in humans’ overall exposure to chemical pollutants. Even just by being in a room with ozone — a common air pollutant that can enter indoors from outside — our bodies react with it, he explained.

In the study, the research team conducted experiments where volunteers sat in a controlled chamber with ozone present. The researchers first measured the OH field created by the volunteers without using personal care products. Then they repeated the experiments after the volunteers applied either a common unscented body lotion or a popular fragrance.

Rim’s team, which helped discover the human oxidation field in 2022, developed a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model to simulate the evolution of the human oxidation field, which made it possible to see the impact of personal care products.

They found that applying the products substantially disrupted the natural human oxidation field. Specifically, the application of unscented lotion caused a roughly 170% increase in OH reactivity, which led to a roughly 140% decrease in OH concentrations around the wearer, meaning their natural ozone barrier was less than half as strong because the OH radicals were floating off into the air instead of forming a protective force field.

The researchers found that the effects of lotion tend to be more persistent over time compared to fragrance. The fragrance effects were stronger initially but less persistent than lotions, as the organic compounds in fragrances, like ethanol, broke down more rapidly into the gas phase and were dispersed more broadly into the air.

“The application of a fragrance and a lotion together showed that fragrances impact the OH reactivity and concentration over shorter time periods, whereas lotions show more persistent effects, consistent with the rate of emissions of organic compounds from these personal care products,” Nora Zannoni, researcher at the Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate in Bologna and lead author on the study, said in a news release.

The other Penn State co-author on the paper is Youngbo Won, who was a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Architectural Engineering. Other authors are Jonathan Williams, Nijing Wang, Tatjana Arnoldi-Meadows, Lisa Ernle and Anywhere Tsokankunku of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry; Pascale S. J. Lakey and Manabu Shiraiwa of the University of California, Irvine; and Charles J. Weschler, Gabriel Bekö, Pawel Wargocki of the Technical University of Denmark.

The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation funded the Penn State aspects of this research.