Friday, June 20, 2025

 NUKE NEWZ

Kazakhstan, China Forge Uranium Partnership as U.S. Falls Behind

  • Kazakhstan and China are deepening energy ties with $25 billion in new deals,
  •  including a nuclear power partnership with China National Nuclear Corporation.

  • Kazakhstan and China are looking at joint uranium exploration projects.

  • China’s nuclear ambitions are accelerating, with 27 reactors under construction and a goal of 150 by 2035

Kazakhstan and China have moved to deepen their strategic partnership, with the two allies set to sign 60 agreements worth up to $25 billion at the China–Central Asia Industrial and Investment Cooperation Forum in Astana. Kazakhstan has identified China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) as a key strategic partner for building nuclear power plants, and will sign a cooperation agreement with China on nuclear energy.

This partnership also includes joint research on transboundary uranium ore belts straddling the two countries. According to Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, bilateral and trade relations between the two countries have reached a new golden period, with Beijing a time-tested and reliable partner of Kazakhstan. China is Kazakhstan’s largest trade partner, with bilateral trade volume reaching a record $44 billion in 2024.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) also took center stage at the forum, specifically highlighting infrastructure development. That included plans to modernize logistics corridors, build new border facilities and simplify customs procedures, reinforcing Kazakhstan’s role as Central Asia’s leading transit hub.

We consider the Chinese company CNNC [China National Nuclear Corporation] as a reliable strategic partner in the NPP construction project. CNNC is known worldwide for its high competence, so it will certainly occupy a worthy niche in our market. In addition, Kazakhstan is a reliable supplier of natural uranium and nuclear fuel to China,” Tokayev said.

Kazakhstan is the United States’ second largest supplier of uranium after Canada, supplying 25% of the country’s imports in 2022--more than twice the volume it ordered from Russia. Kazakhstan is home to 12% of the world’s natural uranium reserves and 43% of the global uranium supply. However, Kazakhstan has no nuclear energy production capacity, with its energy mix dominated by coal at 68%, followed by natural gas and hydro.

For its part, Beijing’s move to secure uranium supplies appears strategic. Five years ago, the country set a target to build 150 nuclear plants by 2035, potentially surpassing the United States in nuclear-generated electricity. Last year, a report by the non-partisan Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) revealed that the U.S. could be up to 15 years behind China in next-generation nuclear power development.

Currently, China has 27 nuclear reactors under development, more than double the tally for any other country, with the country’s fleet now standing at 56 reactors. China is building reactors at a 6-8 per year clip, putting it on track to hit a total of 150 new nuclear reactors by 2035 and surpass the U.S. in nuclear-generated electricity by 2030. In contrast, the U.S. has only launched two new nuclear reactors over the past decade.

According to ITIF researchers, Beijing will likely use this large domestic capacity as a launch pad for competitive reactor exports, similar to its strategy with electric vehicles and batteries. Two years ago, a report emerged that Saudi Arabia was considering a bid from China to build a nuclear power plant, potentially sidelining the United States. This move came as Saudi Arabia seeks to diversify its energy mix and potentially develop a domestic nuclear industry. The U.S. had previously expressed interest in partnering with Saudi Arabia on a civilian nuclear program, but also imposed non-proliferation conditions that resulted in delays.

Beijing is also winning on the innovation front. In December 2023, China unveiled the 200 MW gas-cooled Shidaowan-1 nuclear plant, the world’s first fourth-generation nuclear power plant built with 90% of the technology developed in China. The bulk of China’s current fleet are third-generation reactors initially designed by the U.S. company Westinghouse in the late-1990s. According to ITIF, China’s systemic and organizational approach is largely to credit for the country’s success in nuclear power innovation, noting that it has developed a comprehensive and well-streamlined national strategy for nuclear power. This includes adopting several supportive policies such as feed-in tariffs and low-interest financing, among other subsidies that make the country’s nuclear sector cost-competitive. Additionally, China has streamlined the regulatory approval processes and supply chains.

However, the Trump administration is keen on reviving the U.S. nuclear sector, with Trump signing four executive orders in April in a bid to expedite the deployment of nuclear reactors and ramp up the country’s nuclear energy production from 100 GW in 2024 to 400 GW by 2050.

Unfortunately, the U.S. owns less than 1% of global uranium reserves, meaning that it will be forced to rely on the likes of Kazakhstan for its uranium supplies for years to come. The U.S. produced 700,000 pounds of yellowcake in 2024, good for an impressive 12-fold increase from the previous year, but still a long way off the 32 million pounds it imported in the same year.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com


Niger says it will nationalize a uranium venture operated by France’s Orano


By The Canadian Press
 June 20, 2025 a

The Orano logo at La Defense business district, outside Paris
 (AP Photo/Michel Euler)


DAKAR, Senegal — Niger’s government said Thursday it would nationalize the Somaïr uranium venture operated by French company Orano and accused it of taking a disproportionate share of the uranium produced at the site.

The announcement comes as military authorities in the west African country tighten their grip on foreign companies and civil society. Tensions have simmered for months between Niger’s military government and the French company, and relations between Niamey and Paris have deteriorated.

“Faced with the irresponsible, illegal, and unfair behavior by Orano, a company owned by the French state — a state openly hostile toward Niger since July 26, 2023 ... the government of Niger has decided, in full sovereignty, to nationalize Somaïr,” the authorities said in a statement.

The authorities allege that Orano took a disproportionate share of the uranium produced at Somaïr. They added that the company has also been accused of other “irresponsible actions” at the site, without elaborating.

Orano did not immediately reply to The Associated Press’ request for a comment.

Somaïr is a joint venture between Orano and Niger’s state-owned Sopamin, which operates the only active uranium mine in the country. But last year, authorities took operational control of Somaïr. They also withdrew Orano’s operating permit for the Imouraren uranium mine, with reserves estimated at 200,000 tons.

Orano is involved in several arbitration processes with Niger. Last month it sued the Nigerien authorities after the disappearance of its director and the raiding of its local offices.

Orano has been operating in Niger, the world’s seventh biggest supplier of uranium, for over 50 years and holds majority shares in three main uranium mines in Niger.

Nigerien military authorities seized power in 2023 with a pledge to cut ties with the West and review mining concessions. Before that, the country was the West’s major economic and security partner in the Sahel, the vast region south of the Sahara Desert that has been a hot spot for violent extremism.

Monika Pronczuk, The Associated Press


world-nuclear-news


Greece should consider nuclear, PM says


Friday, 20 June 2025

Greece should be part of the discussion on nuclear energy and should be at the forefront of research and debate into using nuclear energy to decarbonise shipping, the country's Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has told a summit on the regional energy transition.

Greece should consider nuclear, PM says
(Image: Prime Minister of Greece/X)

Mitsotakis made his comments to the Energy Transition Summit: East Med & Southeast Europe, organised by the Financial Times in cooperation with Greek newspaper Kathimerini.

Greece took a decision in 2019 to move away from coal, which had previously been the main source of its electricity, and has achieved that, Mitsotakis said. With more than 50% of its electricity now coming from renewables, it has ambitious targets to increase the penetration of renewables still further, as well as investing in pumped storage and batteries.

"But at the same time we need baseload power … as many countries, we have placed a strategic bet that natural gas is going to supply baseload power for the foreseeable future," he said.

But Mitsotakis made it clear that Greece - and the rest of Europe - should also consider nuclear energy as vital for decarbonisation.

"I think we should be prepared to join the 'nuclear alliance'. And this may come as a shock to some people listening to us, given that Greece is a country that has no background or experience in nuclear energy. But when I look at the overall energy developments, I see no way for the world to get to carbon neutrality without nuclear. And I see very interesting developments in nuclear technology, especially when it comes to the small modular reactors.

"And I just don't want us not to be part of this discussion. I'm not saying we're going to do anything next day, but at the least I want us to be part of the conversation and to understand where these technologies are going. And by the way, this is also a critical issue for Europe. I've been making the case repeatedly at the European Council that we need to place strategic bets in those sectors of clean tech, where we believe that Europe still has a significant comparative advantage. I think nuclear should be one of those. Again, we are not part of the value chain, but there are countries that have experience. So it seems strange to me that a country that is still heavily reliant, a continent that was heavily relying on nuclear technology, is not at the forefront of the new investment in nuclear.

"And of course we also have the fusion debate, which long term is the holy grail of research. So we need to be very present … one of the strategic bets I think that Europe should place in terms of committing significant resources would be nuclear."

Shipping strategy

Nuclear energy is also of particular interest to Greece's shipping industry, Mitsotakis said. "We have to explore whether nuclear is a viable option for shipping, for long haul shipping. As a leading maritime nation, we at least need to be at the forefront of the research and the debate. It may work, it may not work. It's going to be 10, 15 years out. But if we really want to think strategically as a maritime nation, we cannot stay away from this debate. And this, of course, is a discussion that I'm very open to have with the shipping community and to ensure that we create a common working group that is going to look at this technology at least as an option.

"Because when you look at decarbonising shipping, there is no silver bullet … there's no technology right now that seems to stand out, there are interim solutions, but we have to think 10, 15 years into the future. So I don't think we can stay away from this discussion as a country."

The conference took place in Athens on 17-18 June. 

Uzbekistan studying option of a four-unit VVER-1000 plant


Friday, 20 June 2025

Rosatom has signed an agreement with Uzbekistan's Uzatom Atomic Energy Agency to study a possible gigawatt-scale nuclear power plant featuring two or four VVER-1000 units.

Uzbekistan studying option of a four-unit VVER-1000 plant
(Image: Strana Rosatom)

The announcement came at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum (see picture above), and builds on the current project to build a small modular reactor plant in the Jizzah region, featuring six of Rosatom's 55 MWe RITM-200N water-cooled reactors.

Rosatom Director General Alexei Likhachev said: "The Rosatom State Corporation is pleased to be a strategic partner of Uzbekistan in the development of nuclear energy ... the combination of small and large-capacity nuclear power plants can form a powerful 'carbon-free energy cluster' in Uzbekistan and become a response to the country's growing needs for electricity, as well as the basis for the development of industry and innovative industries in the country."

Azim Akhmedkhadjaev, Director of the Atomic Energy Agency, said: "We consider the construction of a high-capacity NPP as a source for creating a reliable and balanced energy system capable of covering both the current and future needs of the country for electricity - environmentally friendly energy. The signing of the agreement allows us to begin active development of the key conditions for the possibility of implementing the project for the construction of a high-capacity nuclear power plant. A joint Working Group has been created that will study the main aspects of the project and assess the cost of construction."

Kazakhstan and other announcements

Also at the forum a meeting was held between Likhachev and the Chairman of the Kazakhstan Atomic Energy Agency, Almasadam Satkaliyev, during which an Indicative Roadmap was approved for the planned new nuclear power plant in the country. The roadmap sets out an indicative timeline and also "provides for the stages of preparation and implementation of the project, including engineering and survey work, conclusion of an EPC contract and development of design documentation".

Kazakhstan announced on Monday that it had selected the Russian bid for its planned new nuclear power plant. Likhachev said: "We appreciate the trust shown by the Kazakh side to lead the international consortium that will build a nuclear power plant in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is our reliable historical partner in the nuclear industry."

Satkaliyev said: "The construction of a nuclear power plant in Kazakhstan is part of a comprehensive strategy to ensure sustainable development of the country's energy sector. We count on close and transparent cooperation with partners to ensure a high level of safety and localisation of production."

There was also an agreement on cooperation on the peaceful uses of nuclear energy with Burkina Faso. Rosatom said it "forms the legal basis for comprehensive cooperation between the two countries in the field of nuclear energy and technology. Key areas of cooperation include assistance in the creation and improvement of Burkina Faso's nuclear infrastructure in accordance with international standards, regulation of nuclear and radiation safety issues, production and use of radioisotopes in industry, medicine and agriculture. In addition, the agreement provides for the development of joint projects in the field of radiation technology and nuclear medicine, as well as the training and retraining of specialists for the nuclear industry of Burkina Faso".

During a Russia-Indonesia business dialogue session there was also discussion of potential small modular reactor and floating power units. Rosatom said it "has developed and presented to the Indonesian leadership a concept for the development of nuclear energy based on both small and large capacity, and is ready to provide comprehensive support in the implementation of the country's large-scale plans for the development of the nuclear industry".

TVO completes Final Takeover of Olkiluoto 3


Friday, 20 June 2025

Operator Teollisuuden Voima Oyj has completed its final acceptance - the Final Takeover - of Olkiluoto 3, which entered commercial operation in 2023.

TVO completes Final Takeover of Olkiluoto 3
(Image: TVO)

Marjo Mustonen, TVO Senior Vice President for Electricity Production, said Olkiluoto 3 (OL3) had "operated reliably during the first two years. The annual outage this spring, the second one at the unit, was also completed successfully. The Final Takeover of OL3 was based on the fulfilment of the terms and conditions laid down in the Plant Supply Contract, but the many benefits we promised OL3 would bring to society have been realised already since 2023".

TVO said that the new EPR unit, a 1600 MWe pressurised water reactor, had helped make Finland nearly self-sufficient in electricity and "contributes to the stability of the electricity price, and as Finland's greatest climate act, also accelerates the clean transition towards a carbon-neutral society".

The Areva-Siemens consortium constructed the OL3 plant under a fixed-price turnkey contract. Construction began in 2005, with completion of the reactor originally scheduled for 2009, but the project has had various delays and setbacks. OL3 attained first criticality on 21 December 2021 and was connected to the grid on 12 March 2022 before entering commercial operation the following May.

TVO issued an acceptance certificate to the Areva-Siemens consortium for the Olkiluoto 3 EPR in April 2023. They had joint liability for the contractual obligations until the end of the two-year warranty period of the unit, which is when the final acceptance of the plant unit took place.

TVO is 27% owned by Fortum and 57% owned by Pohjolan Voima Oy (the major shareholders of which are pulp and paper manufacturers UPM Oyj and Stora Enso Oyj). Owners take their shares of electricity at cost, with any unwanted portion being sold by them into the Nordic market. This means that output is effectively contracted to each owner over the life of the plant. The private owners are mostly heavy industry with a high demand for base-load power, and hence low costs are critical for them.

The French Government Shareholding Agency (Incarner l'État actionnaire) called it a "historic moment for the French nuclear industry, the first commercially operated EPR in Europe, has now been officially handed over".

In a Linkedin post it added: "This final takeover marks a major milestone for Areva, whose activities were refocused on the completion of the OL3 reactor after the restructuring of the French nuclear sector in 2015. It is also a significant step for France, whose Government is the reference shareholder of Areva and a key supporter of the French nuclear industry. Despite the many challenges encountered since the project's kick-off, the commitment of the Areva and Siemens teams, supported by the expertise of Framatome and EDF, enabled the successful completion ... the final delivery of the plant to our Finnish partner closes a major chapter in the history of the French nuclear sector."

"The collective experience gained from this project will directly contribute to the development of the EPR technology, which remains a strategic priority for France and its industry."

Finland has five operable reactors - two at Loviisa and three at Olkiluoto - providing about a third of its electricity. The world's first operational EPRs were China's Taishan 1 in 2018 and Taishan 2 in 2019. Flamanville 3 in France was connected to the grid in December 2024 and two more EPRs are under construction at Hinkley Point C in the UK, with two more planned at Sizewell C.

Robot 'dog' to support Spanish decommissioning project


Friday, 20 June 2025

Energy services group GDES and technology company Alisys are developing an autonomous quadruped robot for decommissioning and waste management firm Enresa to support the decommissioning of the Santa María de Garoña Nuclear Power Plant in Spain.

Robot 'dog' to support Spanish decommissioning project
A Spot robot will be used to help with decommissioning at Garoña (Image: GDES)

The robot will be developed and launched through a temporary joint venture between Alisys and GDES, which will develop a bespoke system based on technology from Boston Dynamics using the Spot Enterprise quadruped robot.

The system will feature a high-precision robotic arm with the capacity to incorporate different measuring instruments and advanced spectrometric analysis software, which will allow for real-time interpretation of data. The system will be connected to a cloud platform, enabling management of the collected data and remote operation of the robot.

The project comprises solution development, testing and commissioning, and the training of Enresa personnel who will eventually operate it at the facility, GDES said.

The robot will be used to characterise materials, walls and floors for the decommissioning and dismantling of Garoña, a single-unit 446 MWe boiling water reactor plant which was closed in December 2012 and defuelled shortly afterwards. Enresa took ownership of the plant in 2023, embarking on a two-phase decommissioning programme that is expected to take ten years to complete.

"As the first initiative of its kind in Spain, this technological investment will enable Enresa to enhance the identification of non-contaminated areas, increase efficiency, and streamline the process of measuring and characterising radioactive waste bound for the El Cabril disposal facility. It also reinforces Enresa's commitment to ALARA principles (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) and to occupational risk prevention durin

US agencies take action to streamline nuclear roll-out



Thursday, 19 June 2025

Separate announcements from the US Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission point towards streamlining the pathway to deployment of advanced reactor technologies.

US agencies take action to streamline nuclear roll-out
(Image: US NRC)

The announcements come weeks after President Donald Trump's raft of Executive Orders aimed at boosting US nuclear energy. Amongst other things, those orders mandated bodies including the Department of Energy (DOE) to expedite the review, approval, and deployment of advanced reactors, and ordered reforms to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) with regulatory evaluation and approval of licence applications for new reactors to be completed within 18 months of starting the regulatory process.

The DOE has now launched a pilot programme to expedite the testing of advanced nuclear reactor designs under DOE authority outside of the national laboratories: the establishment of a pilot programme for the construction and operation of such reactors, with the goal of three reactors reaching criticality by 4 July 2026, was part of the Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy executive order. It has issued a Request for Application (RFA) as it seeks "qualified US reactor companies" interested in constructing and operating test reactors outside National Laboratory sites, which it says is "an important step toward streamlining nuclear reactor testing" and ensuring the 2026 deadline is met.

The pilot programme builds on current efforts to demonstrate advanced reactors on DOE sites through microreactor testbeds and other projects led by the Department of Defense and private industry, the DOE said. The programme is intended to foster research and development of nuclear reactors and not demonstrate reactors for commercial suitability. "Seeking DOE authorisation provided under the Atomic Energy Act will help unlock private funding and provide a fast-tracked approach to enable future commercial licensing activities for potential applicants," it notes.

The department said it will consider advanced reactors that have a "reasonable chance" of operating by July 2026. Applicants will be responsible for all costs associated with designing, manufacturing, constructing, operating, and decommissioning each test reactor, and will be competitively selected based on a set of criteria, including technological readiness, site evaluations, financial viability, and a detailed plan to achieving criticality.

"For too long, the federal government has stymied the development and deployment of advanced civil nuclear reactors in the United States," said Energy Secretary Chris Wright. "Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, we are expediting the development of next-generation nuclear technologies and giving American innovators a new path forward to advance their designs, propelling our economic prosperity and bolstering our national security."

The deadline for initial applications is 21 July.

NRC issues microreactor decisions

The NRC announced that it has reached decisions on three policy matters it says will help enable the deployment of microreactors - reactors generating "about one per cent or less" of the output of a current large-scale reactor, which would be built, loaded with fuel, and tested at factories before being shipped to operating sites.

The Commission has decided that a factory-fabricated microreactor loaded with fuel may be excluded from being considered to be "in operation" if it has features to prevent a nuclear chain reaction; that a microreactor with features to prevent a chain reaction may be loaded with fuel at a factory if it is done under an NRC licence that allows possession of the fuel; and that NRC staff may apply regulations for nonpower reactors to allow testing of a microreactor at a factory before it is shipped to an operating site.

The NRC said it has also directed its staff "to continue other microreactor-related activities, such as engaging with Department of Energy/Defense efforts to build and operate microreactors on DOE/DOD sites or as part of critical national security infrastructure," adding that the engagement "aims to identify and implement licensing process efficiencies, consistent with the ADVANCE Act and relevant executive orders, to streamline the transition of microreactor technology to the commercial sector."

Reorganising regulation

Meanwhile, the NRC's complement of Commissioners is currently down to four following Christopher Hanson's announcement that his role at the regulator has been terminated on the orders of President Donald Trump. "Late on Friday, President Trump terminated my position with the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission without cause, contrary to existing law and longstanding precedent regarding removal of independent agency appointees," Hanson said. "My focus over the last five years has been to prepare the agency for anticipated change in the energy sector, while preserving the independence, integrity, and bipartisan nature of the world’s gold standard nuclear safety institution," he said, adding: "I continue to have full trust and confidence in their commitment to serve the American people by protecting public health and safety and the environment."

The NRC is headed by five Commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for five-year terms, with a chairman designated by the President. Last year, the Senate renewed Hanson's renomination for a five-year term ending in June 2029. David Wright was appointed by President Trump to be chair of the NRC on 20 January, but his current term is due to expire at the end of this month. David Wright was been nominated to a second term as an NRC commissioner in a list of presidential nominations sent to the US Senate, dated 16 June.

The executive order on Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission which the President signed on 23 May calls for the regulator to be reorganised to promote "the expeditious processing of license applications and the adoption of innovative technology", and undertaking "reductions in force" in conjunction with this reorganisation".

Reacting to Hanson's departure, the American Nuclear Society said: "A competent, effective, and fully staffed US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is essential to the rapid deployment of new reactors and advanced technologies. The arbitrary removal of commissioners without due cause creates regulatory uncertainty that threatens to delay America’s nuclear energy expansion."g decommissioning activities," a GDES spokesperson said.

US Supreme Court rules on interim storage facility case



Thursday, 19 June 2025

The US Supreme Court ruled by 6-3 that the State of Texas and Fasken Land and Minerals were not entitled to judicial review of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's decision to license an interim storage facility for used nuclear fuel.

US Supreme Court rules on interim storage facility case
ISP's vision for the CISF (Image: ISP)

The majority view was that the two were not parties to it as neither were licence applicants and neither had successfully intervened in the licensing process.

The background

Interim Storage Partners (ISP) was established in 2018 as a joint venture of Waste Control Specialists and Orano CIS, a subsidiary of Orano USA, to license a consolidated interim storage facility to be built at Waste Control Specialists' existing waste disposal site in Andrews County, Texas. The proposed licence would authorise a facility to store up to 5000 tonnes of used commercial nuclear fuel as well as so-called Greater-Than-Class C waste for a period of 40 years. ISP plans a phased expansion of the facility over 20 years to eventually store up to 40,000 tonnes of used fuel, subject to future approvals.

In July 2021, the NRC issued its final environmental impact statement on ISP's application, recommending a licence be granted for the facility. The licence was issued in September 2021.

Fasken Land and Minerals, along with the State of Texas and others, petitioned for review of the licence. Texas lawmakers passed a law in 2022 prohibiting the storage of high-level radioactive waste in the state, except at currently or formerly operating nuclear power reactors.

In a decision in August 2023 a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled the NRC did not have authority from Congress to license such a private facility away from an existing nuclear power plant site under either the Atomic Energy Act or the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.

The management of civilian used nuclear fuel in the USA is a federal responsibility, but the planned permanent repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, which in 1987 was designated as the sole initial repository for 70,000 tonnes of high-level wastes, has not been built. This means used fuel from over 70 shutdown, decommissioned and operating nuclear energy facilities is currently in storage at sites across the nation.

Facilities such as the one proposed by ISP would offer dry-cask storage at an away-from-reactor site pending disposal at a permanent disposal facility. ISP's facility would use proven above-ground dry fuel storage systems developed by Orano TN and NAC International, which are already in place at numerous operating and decommissioned commercial nuclear energy facilities in the USA. The storage system has a design life in excess of 100 years.

The ruling

In his judgement for the majority position Justice Brett M Kavanaugh said: "Under the Hobbs Act, only an aggrieved 'party' may obtain judicial review of a Commission licensing decision. To qualify as a party to a licensing proceeding, the Atomic Energy Act requires that one either be a license applicant or have successfully intervened in the licensing proceeding. In this case, however, Texas and Fasken are not license applicants, and they did not successfully intervene in the licensing proceeding. So neither was a party eligible to obtain judicial review in the Fifth Circuit. For that reason, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and do not decide the underlying statutory dispute over whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission possesses authority to license private off-site storage facilities."

The majority judgement of the US Supreme Court does not rule on whether or not the NRC has the authority to license such a private facility at a site away from an existing nuclear power plant: "To be clear, because Texas and Fasken's claims are not judicially reviewable, we need not and do not decide the ultimate question of statutory authority that the dissent focuses on. So that there is no confusion, however, we underscore that in resting on the threshold reviewability issue, we are not somehow assuming or buying into a premise that the Commission is wrong on the underlying merits. The dissent's description of an agency that is flagrantly violating its governing statutes seems to be in substantial tension with about 50 years of consistent congressional action, agency practice, and judicial interpretation."

It concludes: "Texas and Fasken were not parties to the Commission's licensing proceeding and are not entitled to obtain judicial review of the Commission's licensing decision. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the cases with instructions to deny or dismiss the petitions for review."

The NRC also issued a licence to Holtec International to build and operate a consolidated interim storage facility for used nuclear fuel in New Mexico in 2023. Holtec International welcomed the Supreme Court's view and said it hoped it would help it to move ahead with its planned consolidated interim storage facility in New Mexico.

TerraPower welcomes new investors to support SMR plans



Thursday, 19 June 2025

The venture capital arm of multinational technology company NVIDIA is among investors in the USD650 million capital raise, which TerraPower says will support the first Natrium plant as well as the company’s plans to rapidly deploy additional units in the US and abroad.

TerraPower welcomes new investors to support SMR plans
A rendering of the Natrium plant design: decoupling the energy island from the nuclear island helps make the technology faster and more cost-effective to deploy, the company says (Image: TerraPower/X)

NVentures, the venture capital arm of NVIDIA, was among new investors that took part in the fundraise, which closed on 18 June, TerraPower said. Current investors, including TerraPower-founder Bill Gates and South Korean conglomerate HD Hyundai, have also participated.

"TerraPower was founded on the idea that innovation in nuclear science could make positive, global impacts. This round further establishes that our technologies are the solutions that industry is looking for," TerraPower President and CEO Chris Levesque said. "We are proud to have NVIDIA join our visionary group of investors."

“As AI continues to transform industries, nuclear energy is going to become a more vital energy source to help power these capabilities,” Corporate Vice President and Head of NVentures Mohamed Siddeek said. “TerraPower's nuclear reactor technologies offer innovative, carbon-free solutions to meet global energy needs while minimising environmental impact.”

In March, TerraPower announced a strategic collaboration with HDHyundai affiliate HDHyundai Heavy Industries to expand the global manufacturing supply chain for Natrium small modular reactors, supporting the rapid commercialisation of the technology. In 2024, HD Hyundai Heavy Industries was competitively selected by TerraPower to develop the cylindrical reactor vessel to be installed in the first Natrium reactor.

Natrium technology features a 345 MWe sodium-cooled fast reactor using high-assay low-enriched uranium fuel, with a molten salt-based energy storage system that can boost the system's output to 500 MWe for more than five and a half hours when needed. The company began non-nuclear construction activities on the site of the first Natrium plant, at Kemmerer in Wyoming, last year and said it expects to get regulatory approval for the nuclear reactor next year.

As part of the permitting process for the Kemmerer plant, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission this week issued a draft environmental impact statement for public comment with a deadline of 4 August.

TerraPower said it will continue to be a privately held company, and did not disclose further terms of the fundraise.

INB signs Brazil microreactor contracts


Thursday, 19 June 2025

Industrias Nucleares do Brasil has signed a contract with the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation and the Financing Agency for Studies and Projects for the development and testing of critical technologies applicable to Brazil's planned microreactor.

INB signs Brazil microreactor contracts
(Image: INB)

The three year BRL50 million (USD9.1 million) project also brings together research centres, universities and others, including the navy and the Institute of Energy and Nuclear Research and the Institute of Nuclear Engineering.

Industrias Nucleares do Brasil (INB) will be responsible for supplying nuclear fuel and specialised engineering services as well as providing technical and administrative support.

INB President Adauto Seixas said: "This is a historic milestone for the Brazilian nuclear sector. INB reinforces its vocation not only as a producer of nuclear fuel, but also as a technology-based, strategic company that is a leading player in the development of innovative solutions for the country. Nuclear microreactors have enormous potential to bring clean, safe and sustainable energy to remote regions, in addition to meeting industrial, defence and national energy security demands."

INB’s Director of Nuclear Fuel Reinaldo Gonzaga said the technology "could revolutionise distributed energy generation in Brazil".

The National Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN) project aims to demonstrate the feasibility of the development of a Brazilian 3-5 MW microreactor. The vision is for the microreactor to fit within a 40-foot container and be operated remotely for more than 10 years without any need for refuelling.

Suggested uses including providing reliable power to remote towns, to hospitals and factories and reducing dependency on diesel generators. In March the commission said: "The project is currently at the TRL 3 technological readiness level, which corresponds to the mathematical modeling and preliminary studies phase. The goal is to advance to TRL 6, the level at which the technology is demonstrated in a relevant environment, closer to practical application."

There are various microreactor projects at different stages of development around the world. While small modular reactors are generally seen as including reactors up to 300 MW, microreactors are said by the International Atomic Energy Agency to be those designed for up to about 20 MW, with container-based ones seen as especially having the ability to be transported to a wide range of potential locations, including isolated areas.

Meanwhile, Rosatom International's First Deputy Director General for Marketing and Business Development Egor Kvyatkovsky was reported by Strana Rosatom to have told the St Petersburg International Economic Forum that Russia was offering Brazil joint projects for the construction of large and small-capacity nuclear power plants, and is also planning to open a transport corridor from Russia based on the port facilities of St. Petersburg.

He said: "Nuclear power plants - both land-based and floating - are an excellent solution for providing energy to various regions of Brazil. We offer a full range of services, including construction of nuclear power plants, maintenance, fuel supplies, and joint operation."

Brazil currently has two operating power reactors - Angra 1 and Angra 2 - which generate about 3% of the country’s electricity. Work on the Angra 3 project - to feature a Siemens/KWU 1405 MW pressurised water reactor - began in 1984 but was suspended two years later, before construction began. The scheme was resurrected in 2006, with first concrete in 2010. However, amid a corruption probe into government contracts, construction of the unit was halted for a second time in 2015, when it was 65% complete. It has since restarted and been halted again, with a decision currently awaited on completing it.

Regulator completes preliminary assessment of Steady Energy's SMR concept



Friday, 20 June 2025

The Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority says the draft concept assessment for Steady Energy's proposed LDR-50 plant found that "nuclear and radiation safety, security arrangements, emergency arrangements and nuclear material safeguards solutions are such that they can be designed to meet safety requirements".

Regulator completes preliminary assessment of Steady Energy's SMR concept
A multiple LDR-50 unit plant (Image: Steady Energy)

Concept assessment is a procedure proposed in the new Nuclear Energy Act in which the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) assesses whether the power plant could meet safety requirements in general terms. It is separate to the construction permit process for the nuclear power plant.

STUK said it used the draft concept as a basis for its assessment. It also said of Steady Energy, which had requested the assessment, that "although it is not yet a complete plant supplier for a nuclear power plant, it has the potential to develop into one".

Project Manager for STUK, Minna Tuomainen, said the process was useful for the authority: "We were able to get to know the plant at an early stage, for which a permit may be applied for in Finland later." It would also help inform the development of the legislation regarding concept assessments, she said.

Tommi Nyman, CEO of Steady Energy, welcomed the authority's verdict and said they would continue to work closely in future, adding: "The result of the concept assessment supports our view of the development schedule of the LDR-50 nuclear power plant and confirms our previous view of the implementation schedule of the LDR-50 plants in Finland."

Juho Vierimaa, Head of Licensing and Quality, said: "We hoped for and received invaluable information from the evaluation to support our work. In addition, the assessment reinforces our belief that we are on the right path in terms of both technology and organisational development."

Steady Energy said that in accordance with the recommendations of the assessment it will demonstrate the operation of key safety features in a full-size pilot plant built inside a former coal-fired power plant in Salmisaari, Helsinki. Construction is scheduled to start in late 2025, with a budget of EUR15-20 million (USD17-23 million), funded by capital investments already raised by Steady Energy.

The pilot plant will serve as a full-scale, operational model of the Finnish-designed LDR-50 reactor design. Unlike the actual power plant, the pilot unit will use an electric element to produce heat inside the reactor capsule instead of nuclear fuel. The main purpose is to test operational features and to establish the necessary supply chains with various manufacturers to construct actual plants. It will be used to produce heat for the Helen district heating network with an output of about 6 MW when completed.

Following Finland's regulator's assessment an international assessment from regulators is also about to begin, building on STUK's work as they assess the reactor and "seek to find ways in which authorities in different countries could benefit from each other's work".

Steady Energy was spun out of Finland's VTT Technical Research Centre in 2023. The LDR-50 SMR, with a thermal output of 50 MW, is designed to operate at around 150°C. Unlike most SMRs being developed around the world, it is not designed to generate electricity - or electricity and heat. Instead, it is designed to only produce heat and is focused on district heating, as well as industrial steam production and desalination projects.

The company has already signed agreements for 15 reactors in Finland, with its reactor design currently being assessed by STUK. The aim is for construction of the first plant - to be the clean energy source for a district heating scheme - to begin in 2029.

Listen to a World Nuclear News podcast interview with Tommi Nyman in September 2024:

 

Article researched and written by WNN's Alex Hunt




The Physics of Collapse: How to Adapt to Economic Shifts

  • The world is facing a slow-motion economic collapse driven by resource limits, high debt, increasing complexity, and an unaffordable standard of living for many.


  • Individuals are encouraged to practice gratitude, avoid direct conflict, expect declining complexity and fewer available goods, and focus on the present rather than past or future expectations.

  • Practical suggestions include living in groups, avoiding debt for higher education, being flexible in career choices, prioritizing personal health, and cultivating modest gardens.

Today, the world is filled with conflict. Part of the problem is oil limits, but there are many other issues as well:

  • Resources such as coal, lithium, and copper are also becoming more expensive to extract.
  • Fresh water is often inadequate for the world’s rising population.
  • Debt levels are very high.
  • Complexity is very high.
  • An adequate standard of living is becoming unaffordable for many people.
  • The increasing world population leads to a need for more food and more paved roads.

These symptoms strongly suggest that the world economy is headed for a slow-motion collapse.

A graph illustrating the concept that societal collapse follows a predictable pattern, showing the relationship between complexity, fossil fuel consumption, wage and wealth disparity, and the resulting declines in population and GDP.
Figure 1. Overall pattern of today’s predicament, in an image by Gail Tverberg. We seem to be up near the top now.

The system causing the problem is physics-based. Without enough affordable energy of the right types, the economy tends to collapse. This is the predicament we are facing today.

What should ordinary citizens do? I am not certain that there is one correct answer, or that I know it. In this post, I would like to offer some suggestions for discussion.

[1] Every day, give thanks for the many things you do have.

We are at the peak of resources per capita. This means that, as a group, we have as many goods and services as any population that has ever lived. We also have lots of natural resources remaining. We have a huge amount of complexity, with many young people receiving university degrees.

It is easy to lose sight of how much we do have. Most readers of this blog eat a variety of food in the quantities desired. We live in homes that are heated in winter. Even today, many people around the world are not as fortunate as we are.

[2] To the extent possible, stay away from conflict yourself.

The physics of the system will create conflict because the system must change if there is no longer enough oil to ship huge amounts of goods and services across the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans. Perhaps a few highly valued goods and services can be shipped long distance, but patterns must change to put the production of goods and services closer to the consumption of goods and services. This is a major reason why countries are quarreling now.

There is no point in individuals strongly objecting to cutbacks in trade because today’s lack of oil supply is demanding these cuts. The only way one country can lessen the impact of the reduced oil supply is to push the reduction in indirect oil consumption onto another country, using quotas or tariffs on its imports of goods and services. Needless to say, pushing other countries down to benefit one’s own country is likely to create conflict.

Another issue is that with reduced oil and other energy supplies, governments cannot continue to provide as many services as they have in the recent past. They need to reduce the number of government workers in many departments. This is the reason for the many cutbacks by the US Department of Government Efficiency and similar cuts in other countries. It also means that benefit programs, such as those aimed at seniors, the disabled, or hurricane relief, will need to be reduced or eliminated in the future.

We can argue about which programs should be cut back first, but ultimately, all government programs will need to be cut back substantially. Just printing money to try to solve the problem will likely lead to inflation; money doesn’t solve the physics problem we are facing. Energy products of the right kinds are needed for every part of GDP; not having sufficient oil is likely to cut back the supply of goods produced using oil products, including food.

If you get involved in protests, or even in war, you will be putting yourself in harm’s way. And, in the long run, you are unlikely to gain significant benefits personally.

[3] Expect declining complexity in the future.

There are many aspects to complexity:

  • Much international trade
  • Much debt
  • Businesses with multiple layers
  • Governments providing a wide range of services, including pension plans and health care
  • Energy efficient vehicles
  • Appliances that are designed to save energy
  • Healthcare with many specialized physicians and high-cost drugs
  • Agriculture with many hybrid seeds, herbicides, insecticides, and soil amendments

All these types of complexity will need to be scaled back in the future, but we don’t know precisely to what extent or how rapidly. We cannot go back to old solutions because these won’t necessarily be available. For example, we know from the past that if an economy no longer operates with horses and carriages, it will no longer make buggy whips.

We need to expect a rapidly changing world. Complex appliances we own will fail, and we will not be able to obtain replacement parts. Many drugs imported from Asia will no longer be available. Homes purchased with debt will be affordable by fewer and fewer people. We need to be aware of these issues and change our expectations accordingly.

[4] Expect fewer goods and services to be available in the future, and money to have less value.

We are no longer moving to an ever-better world; we are moving (at least for a few years, perhaps much longer) to a shrinking world economy. Do not be surprised if home values drop and stock market values fall.

Saving money for the future makes less and less sense because fewer goods and services will be available to buy in the future. Even saving gold will not necessarily work around the problem of there being fewer goods to buy. For example, farmers and others involved in producing food will likely get food before others, to assure the continued production of food. This will leave less food for others to buy.

Electricity is likely to become intermittent in the years ahead. It would seem wise to stay away from purchasing condominiums that can only be accessed by elevators.

[5] Focus on the present, not the past or the future.

In our current world, great stress is placed on planning for the future. For example, workers are encouraged to save for retirement, and young people are encouraged to take courses that will allow them to work in a well-paying occupation for the long term. This plan assumes that that the upward trend we have seen in the past will continue. We also expect that governments will be able to make good on their promises.

But we really cannot expect this pattern to continue for the long term. The best we can hope for is that what we have right now will continue. If a family member is lost, the remaining members will need to pick themselves as quickly as possible and continue as best they can. This is one reason an extended family is helpful in Africa. Such an approach will increasingly be helpful elsewhere.

Fossil fuels have made retirement possible. As fossil fuel availability declines, retirement is less likely to be available. Everyone will need to work as long as they are physically available. Thus, saving for retirement becomes a less useful goal.

[6] Living in groups, particularly family groups, will increasingly make sense.

When things were going well, and wages of most educated people were high, it made sense for many people to live by themselves. If they had an argument with their spouse, picking up and leaving might sound like a sensible idea. The job of each spouse would be sufficient to pay for housing for each separately.

As the economy goes downhill, people will need to live in more compact housing in order to save on heating and transportation expenses. Multiple generations will increasingly need to live together. In the case of singles, they will increasingly need to band together. Government programs will likely not be sufficient to provide separate living arrangements for a mother with children or for elderly individuals in care homes.

[7] Young people should not go into debt for higher education.

At this point, the US has educated far too many people with college degrees (and beyond) relative to the number the economy can afford to hire. With declining complexity, adding more college-educated workers to the pool makes little sense.

A better choice for most young people is a short course or certificate program leading to a useful skill, such as appliance repair or becoming a licensed practical nurse. Apprentice programs may also make sense.

If families are wealthy enough to pay for their children’s education, a few people with advanced degrees will probably be needed. There may be some solutions to today’s problems that can be tackled by these individuals.

[8] People will need to be more flexible in their career choices.

As the economy changes, job availability will change. Demand for workers in many of today’s high-paying careers will likely decline. For example, fewer specialty physicians will be needed. There will also be a need for fewer college professors, fewer stock market analysts, and fewer computer programmers.

The most immediate new jobs will involve the demolition of infrastructure that is no longer needed, such as movie theaters, shopping malls, office buildings, and many homes. Some materials will likely be saved for reuse elsewhere. This may involve heavy labor. Smaller, more local stores or open-air markets may open. Jobs previously held by immigrants picking vegetables and fruit will also be available.

How does a person step down from a high-paid desk job to a low-paid manual labor job? I don’t know. But, somehow, we need to be thinking through this issue.

[9] People should focus on taking care of their own health through healthy eating and adequate exercise.

I expect the healthcare industry will be forced to change. One part of the problem will be fewer imported drugs and medical devices; another will be that most people will be less wealthy. They will not be able to afford the enormous costs of today’s bloated US healthcare system. Somehow, the system will need to shrink back.

Fortunately, there is a way that people can become healthier, despite lower spending. People can cook their own food, instead of buying over-processed food available from grocery stores and restaurants. They can eat less meat than the average American eats, and they can stay away from sugary soft drinks. They can exercise more. Part of this exercise can take place by walking to more local markets.

[10] Planting a modest garden, as far as this is possible, is probably a good idea.

Most people do not have sufficient land to plant very much in the way of food crops. In fact, a large share of my readers probably lives in apartment buildings. And most young people, attempting to live on their own, will not have space to grow food crops. The cost of buying land is likely to be high, and property taxes will need to be paid.

If space is available on property that is already owned, fruit trees that grow and bear fruit without the need for pesticide spraying are a good choice. These trees will likely take several years to get started. Potatoes are another reasonable choice, as are vegetables in general.

It is not clear to me that people who set out to operate a self-sufficient farm will have much success. They require a complex infrastructure to support them. Such farms are very vulnerable to robbers and generally don’t have good backup plans if something goes wrong, such as the farmer becoming injured. I wish these individuals success in their endeavors, but I am not optimistic that these farms will succeed beyond their first major setback. We need a bridge to sustainable agriculture, but it is hard for me to see one right now.

[11] Concluding Observation: Why standing back from conflict is a suitable approach.

Most people have a completely mistaken idea regarding what oil limits will look like. They assume that oil limits will lead to very high prices or long lines at gasoline stations. They fail to appreciate that oil limits will arrive at the same time as many other limits, including affordability limits. They also fail to understand that prices that are too low for producers will bring down oil production quickly. In fact, too low oil prices, rather than too high, are the issue the world is facing today.

What oil limits really lead to is lots of conflict: among nations, among political parties, among people who feel that it is unfair that they have spent a lot of money on an advanced education but cannot find a job that pays well enough to repay their education-related debt with interest. As limits of many kinds mentioned in the beginning of this post are hit, today’s economy will need to greatly shrink back in size. Many governmental structures that we expect today, including the EU, the World Bank, and the UN, may disappear.

We don’t know precisely what is ahead over the longer term. Some people believe a religious ending is likely. Other people think that some of the research that is currently underway may eventually lead to a solution. Still others are concerned that some parts of the world will need to shrink back to a very low level, perhaps similar to hunter-gathering, before these economies can grow again.

Regardless of how things play out, it is the physics of the self-organizing system that determines what happens next. No matter how offended we as individuals may feel regarding what some political party or politician has done or has not done, individuals are not able to fix the system, except to the extent that available inexpensive energy supply allows such a fix. This is why standing back from whatever conflict is taking place seems to me to be a suitable strategy.

By Gail Tverberg via Our Finite World