Tuesday, August 10, 2021

IPCC climate change report will make some people think humanity is doomed. But if we act quickly, there is hope – Bob Ward

A new assessment of the science of climate change makes grim reading for the world as governments prepare for the critical Cop26 United Nations summit in Glasgow in November.

By Bob Ward
Tuesday, 10th August 2021
A local resident gestures for help as he tries to tackle a wildfire approaching the village of Pefki on Evia island in Greece. No water is getting through to the hosepipe 
(Picture: Angelos Tzortzinis/AFP via Getty Images)


The report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that many of the consequences which it forecast in its previous reports are now happening. And it warns that we are perilously close to missing the targets agreed in Paris six years ago to avoid dangerous climate change.


This is the first comprehensive assessment of the state of knowledge about climate change science that the IPCC has issued since 2013. It is nearly 4,000 pages in length, prepared by 234 authors from 66 countries who have spent the last three years reviewing more than 14,000 studies.

The report includes a 41-page ‘Summary for Policymakers’ that was approved line by line over the past two weeks by representatives from almost every government in the world.

It finds that the global average surface temperature has increased by just over one degree Celsius since the second half of the 19th century. The Earth is now warmer than it has been for since 125,000 years ago, when the polar ice caps were smaller and global sea level was about five to ten metres higher than today.

Unlike earlier assessments, this report blames all of the rise in temperature on human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels. It notes that the warming has been slightly offset by cooling from fine aerosol particles we have released into the atmosphere, which have been blocking out some of the Sun’s energy.


The consequences of this warming are laid out in stark terms. Glaciers around the world have shrunk, the surface of the vast Greenland ice sheet has started to melt, and all the extra water has led to an accelerating rise in global sea level.

Read MoreCOP26: The five key takeaways from international report on climate change catast...



While the IPCC has documented these impacts before, the authors are now confident that our greenhouse gas emissions are making extreme events more frequent and intense. The summary states: “Human-induced climate change is already affecting many weather and climate extremes in every region across the globe.”

It draws attention to stronger evidence for “observed changes in extremes such as heatwaves, heavy precipitation, droughts, and tropical cyclones, and, in particular, their attribution to human influence”.

However, as the report only reviews the evidence that had been documented by scientists before February this year, it excludes the most recent heatwaves, floods and wildfires that have occurred over the past few months.

But it is the forward-looking part of the report that is the most worrying. It lays out five different scenarios for global emissions. The most extreme assumes that the annual amount of global emissions of carbon dioxide triples over the next 60 years, leading to a global temperature by the end of the century that could be almost 6C higher than in the second half of the 19th century.

In its scenario assuming the strongest action against emissions, carbon dioxide output falls rapidly and reaches net zero soon after the middle of the century, before becoming negative. It would mean cutting emissions as much as possible and any residual amounts after about 2050 would need to be outweighed by human activities that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through planting more trees and other vegetation, or by using synthetic means to filter it out and permanently store it, including in disused North Sea oil and gas wells.

In this case, global temperature would probably reach 1.5C above the late 19th century baseline by 2050 before dropping slightly by the end of the century.

In another scenario, carbon dioxide emissions reach zero and become negative by about 2075. Warming would exceed 1.5C but would stay below 2C by the end of the century.

These two scenarios would meet the upper and lower limits of the target set in the Paris Agreement, which commits governments to “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5C”.

But the IPCC report makes clear that even if we succeed in meeting these targets, the climate will continue to change for at least the next 30 years. It warns that there will be “increases in the frequency and intensity of hot extremes, marine heatwaves, and heavy precipitation, agricultural and ecological droughts in some regions, proportion of intense tropical cyclones as well as reductions in Arctic sea ice, snow cover and permafrost”.

In other words, the world will have to become more resilient to these impacts while also making every effort to stop global warming.

The nastiest part of the IPCC assessment lurks towards the end of the summary, in a section that it describes as “low-likelihood outcomes”. These are sometimes described as tipping points or climate thresholds because they result in irreversible, unstoppable or accelerating global or regional impacts. They include destabilisation of the polar ice sheets, leading to rapid or large sea-level rise, and the death of major forests, such as the Amazon.

The summary states: “The probability of low-likelihood, high-impact outcomes increases with higher global warming levels. Abrupt responses and tipping points of the climate system, such as strongly increased Antarctic ice sheet melt and forest dieback, cannot be ruled out.”

Given that these could have the most serious consequences for the world, it is surprising that the IPCC report does not give them greater prominence.

Some will regard this IPCC report as another depressing indicator that we are already doomed. But it is important that it leads to a strengthening of resolve by individuals, companies and governments to accelerate and strengthen all our efforts to tackle climate change.


Bob Ward is policy and communications director at the Grantham research institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and Political Science

Immediate changes required to limit global
warming: IPCC


Tuesday, 10 August, 2021


Scientists are observing changes in the Earth’s climate in every region and across the whole climate system, according to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

The IPCC Working Group I report, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, features 234 authors from 66 countries, as well as 517 contributing authors, and includes over 14,000 cited references. Approved last week by 195 member governments of the IPCC, it is the first instalment of the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), which will be completed in 2022.

Faster warming

The report provides new estimates of the chances of crossing the global warming level of 1.5°C in the next decades, and finds that unless there are immediate, rapid and large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, limiting warming to close to 1.5 or even 2°C will be beyond reach.

The report shows that emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are responsible for approximately 1.1°C of warming since 1850–1900, and finds that averaged over the next 20 years, global temperature is expected to reach or exceed 1.5°C of warming. This assessment is based on improved observational datasets to assess historical warming, as well as progress in scientific understanding of the response of the climate system to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.

“We now have a much clearer picture of the past, present and future climate, which is essential for understanding where we are headed, what can be done and how we can prepare,” said IPCC Working Group I Co-Chair Valérie Masson-Delmotte.
Every region facing increasing changes

The report projects that in the coming decades climate changes will increase in all regions. For 1.5°C of global warming, there will be increasing heat waves, longer warm seasons and shorter cold seasons. At 2°C of global warming, heat extremes would more often reach critical tolerance thresholds for agriculture and health, the report shows.

But it is not just about temperature. Climate change is bringing multiple different changes in different regions — which will all increase with further warming. These include changes to wetness and dryness, winds, snow and ice, coastal areas and oceans.


 For example:

Climate change is intensifying the water cycle. This brings more intense rainfall and associated flooding, as well as more intense drought in many regions.

Climate change is affecting rainfall patterns. In high latitudes, precipitation is likely to increase, while it is projected to decrease over large parts of the subtropics. Changes to monsoon precipitation are expected, which will vary by region.

Coastal areas will see continued sea level rise throughout the 21st century, contributing to more frequent and severe coastal flooding in low-lying areas and coastal erosion.

 Extreme sea level events that previously occurred once in 100 years could happen every year by the end of this century.

Further warming will amplify permafrost thawing, and the loss of seasonal snow cover, melting of glaciers and ice sheets, and loss of summer Arctic sea ice.

Changes to the ocean, including warming, more frequent marine heatwaves, ocean acidification and reduced oxygen levels have been clearly linked to human influence.

 These changes affect both ocean ecosystems and the people that rely on them, and they will continue throughout at least the rest of this century.

For cities, some aspects of climate change may be amplified, including heat (since urban areas are usually warmer than their surroundings), flooding from heavy precipitation events and sea level rise in coastal cities.


The Sixth Assessment Report also provides a more detailed regional assessment of climate change, including a focus on useful information that can inform risk assessment, adaptation and other decision-making, and a new framework that helps translate physical changes in the climate — heat, cold, rain, drought, snow, wind, coastal flooding and more — into what they mean for society and ecosystems. This regional information can be explored in detail in the newly developed Interactive Atlas as well as regional fact sheets, the technical summary and the underlying report.
Human influence on the past and future climate

Many of the changes observed in the climate are said to be unprecedented in thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years, and some of the changes already set in motion — such as continued sea level rise — are irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. As noted by Masson-Delmotte, “It has been clear for decades that the Earth’s climate is changing, and the role of human influence on the climate system is undisputed.”

The new report reflects major advances in the science of attribution — understanding the role of climate change in intensifying specific weather and climate events such as extreme heatwaves and heavy rainfall events. It also shows that human actions still have the potential to determine the future course of climate, finding that strong and sustained reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases would limit climate change — though it could take 20–30 years to see global temperatures stabilise.

“Stabilising the climate will require strong, rapid and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and reaching net zero CO2 emissions,” said IPCC Working Group I Co-Chair Panmao Zhai. “Limiting other greenhouse gases and air pollutants, especially methane, could have benefits both for health and the climate.”

Image credit: ©stock.adobe.com/au/Melinda Nagy


IPCC report: 'Reality check' as widespread climate changes rapidly intensify

World leaders will fail to honor their climate pledges unless they make "immediate, rapid and large-scale reductions" to greenhouse gas emissions, a long-awaited assessment finds.




Climate change has made heat waves hotter and more frequent


Carbon pollution has risen to such extremes that a key threshold in the fight to stop climate change — limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century — will be crossed within the next 15 years.

That is one of the key findings from a landmark report approved by delegates from 195 countries and published Monday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The analysis, which comes amid record-breaking heat and rains that have rocked rich and poor countries alike, draws on more than 14,000 peer-reviewed studies to assess the physical science of climate change. It paints a sober picture of a planet warped beyond recognition by members of a single species in the space of just a few hundred years.

"This report is a reality check," said Valérie Masson-Delmotte, co-chair of the IPCC working group that prepared it.



Also the world's richest countries are suffering from worsening weather extremes

By burning fossil fuels and releasing gases that heat the Earth like a greenhouse, people have warmed the planet by about 1.1 C. Across the world, the report shows, this has made heat waves and heavy rains stronger and more common. The share of tropical cyclones with high wind speeds has risen. In many regions, droughts are drier and last longer.

Since the fifth major IPCC assessment of the physical science in 2013, scientists have also grown more certain that climate change has made individual fires, floods and storms stronger. There is a simple solution to prevent weather getting worse — to stop burning fossil fuels — but governments, businesses and individual people are failing to do so fast enough.

"When I look at the results we found on climate extremes, then I'd say we are in a climate crisis," said Sonia Seneviratne, a scientist at the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science at ETH Zurich in Switzerland, and co-author of the report. "We really have a very big problem."


Greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere as people burn fossil fuels
How fast is climate change heating the world?

In 2015, world leaders pledged to limit warming by the end of the century to well below 2 C — ideally 1.5 C — in a global effort to avoid escalating catastrophes. But they are instead pursuing policies that put the planet on track for 3 C, according to German-based research group Climate Action Tracker.

While the 1.5 C target will be broached within a couple of decades, temperatures could be brought back below it by the end of the century under the report's most ambitious scenario for cutting pollution. As well as rapidly decarbonizing the global economy, it would involve sucking enormous amounts of CO2 out of the atmosphere. But the technology to do so is expensive, and there is little evidence to suggest it could work at the scales needed.

"It's much easier to avoid emissions now rather than blowing past our carbon budget and having to take a lot of emissions out of the atmosphere again," said Malte Meinshausen, a scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germny and co-author of the report. "That price tag is higher than a lot of the low-hanging fruit that we have today."


What is climate change doing to the planet?

Across the globe, extreme rains will grow 7% heavier for each degree Celsius of global warming. More tropical cyclones will be classed in the highest categories 4 and 5. Asian monsoon rains will fall harder and at different times.

"With every additional increment of global warming, changes in extremes continue to become larger," the authors wrote.

Heavy rains that used to hit once a decade have already grown 30% more likely. But with a further 3 C of warming, they will strike two or even three times per decade, and unleash a third more water when they do fall. Droughts that used to occur once every 10 years will leave soil barren and infertile four times per decade instead. Heat waves — already 2.8 times more likely and 1 C hotter than before the industrial revolution — will be 9.4 times more likely and 5 C hotter.

And the greater the warming, the greater the risk of the climate warping out of step in terms of temperature rise. The report projects heat waves that used to scorch the land once every 50 years will, in a world with 4 C of global warming, instead strike 39 times over the same time period instead. "The report clearly sets out the evidence of the urgency of action," said Veronika Eyring, an Earth systems scientist at the German Aerospace Center and another co-author of the report.

Will feedback loops accelerate warming?

Some of the changes to the climate will spur further warming. Natural carbon sinks in the ocean and on land become less effective as the planet heats. Higher temperatures will thaw even more permafrost — releasing vast quantities of methane into the atmosphere — while melting snow and ice cover that reflects heat away from the planet. The Arctic is likely to be practically free of sea ice in September at least once before 2050.

Still, scientists say permafrost thaw, the most worrying of these, is not enough to lead to runaway warming within a dramatic, self-reinforcing acceleration of climate change. But that would make the fight to stabilize the climate harder. Higher levels of atmospheric pollution mean stronger feedback loops that become harder to predict.

Some processes have also started that cannot be stopped. Sea levels are expected to rise more than 0.5 meter (1 foot 8 inches) this century. This has already started to make coastal floods stronger and more likely, and will continue to do so in the future. Scientists say that uncertainties in how ice sheets respond to warming mean that far worse extremes – 2 meters by 2100 and 5 meters by 2150 under a "very high" emissions scenario – can't be ruled out.

Every bit of climate protection helps, said Douglas Maraun, a scientist at the Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change in Austria and also a co-author of the report. "Every degree – or 10th of a degree – of warming that is avoided reduces the risk of extreme events. Perhaps that helps us not to bury our heads in the sand."


Sea levels will keep rising long after greenhouse gas emissions stop

Stopping fossil fuels


The biggest sources of the greenhouse gas emissions changing the climate are coal, oil and gas. But the report's 43-page summary for policymakers, a document prepared first by scientists and then approved line-by-line by government delegates, does not contain the words "fossil fuels."

IPCC authors are not allowed to comment on the approval meeting itself, which is confidential, but "in the material that the scientists write, absolutely, fossil fuels get mentioned," said climate scientist Meinshausen. But "even while we lose some words, it is a remarkable achievement to have in the end the agreement from all governments. Not a single government in the world can now turn around and say they don't believe what the IPCC wrote."

"The science stands for itself and was not watered down in the process," added Friederike Otto, a climate scientist at the University of Oxford and co-author of the report.

The IPCC report is the first installment of three and comes ahead of the COP26 climate summit in the United Kingdom in November. World leaders will discuss solutions like promising to stop burning coal by 2030 and fulfilling a pledge made by rich countries to pay poorer ones $100 billion a year to adapt to climate change by 2020. They have so far failed to do so.

IN PICTURES: DEADLY EXTREME WEATHER SHOCKS THE WORLD
Fierce flash floods in Europe
Unprecedented flooding — caused by two months' worth of rainfall in two days — has resulted in devastating damage in western Europe, leaving at least 209 people dead in Germany and Belgium. Narrow valley streams swelled into raging floods in the space of hours, wiping out centuries-old communities. Rebuilding the ruined homes, businesses and infrastructure is expected to cost billions of euros. 1234567891011


Climate-vulnerable island nations call on world to save 'our very future'


Issued on: 10/08/2021 -
An alliance of island nations at risk from climate change have called on the world to take decisive action Jewel SAMAD AFP/File

New York (AFP)

Dozens of small island states most vulnerable to the effects of climate change have called on the world to save "our very future" after a landmark UN report said accelerating global warming and rising sea levels threaten their existence.

The call to action comes after the climate report warned that catastrophic global warming is occurring far more quickly than previously forecast, an assessment met with horror and hopefulness by world leaders and green groups.

"We have to turn this around," Diann Black-Layne, lead climate negotiator for the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and ambassador of Antigua and Barbuda, said in a statement late Monday.

"The stark fact is that if we keep warming to 1.5C we are still facing half a metre of sea level rise. But if we stop warming from reaching 2C, we can avoid a long term three metres of sea level rise. That is our very future, right there."

The group comprises 39 states including Cuba, Jamaica, Papua New Guinea and the Maldives, the world's lowest-lying country.

It said the report confirmed that governments around the world must take critical action to cap warming to the 1.5C temperature goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, published on Monday, said the world is on course to reach that level around 2030, a decade earlier than predicted just three years ago.

That level of global warming will have devastating impacts on humanity, including more extreme weather events such as fires, typhoons, droughts and floods.

Global warming: key points of the UN report Alain BOMMENEL AFP

In its first major scientific assessment since 2014, the IPCC said by mid-century, the 1.5C threshold will have been breached across the board, by a tenth of a degree along the most ambitious pathway, and by nearly a full degree at the opposite extreme.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning and deforestation are "choking our planet and putting billions of people at immediate risk" and said countries must "combine forces" to avert catastrophe.

Many world leaders reacted to the report by calling for immediate action to curtail the rise of the world's temperature.

But Australia's conservative prime minister rejected growing calls on Tuesday to adopt more ambitious emissions targets, while China insisted it was implementing its climate commitments and signalled no new policies despite the report's findings.

© 2021 AFP


China signals steady course after UN climate warning

Issued on: 10/08/2021 - 07:20

China has been criticised for pushing ahead with opening dozens of new coal power plants to ensure economic growth Johannes EISELE AFP/File

Beijing (AFP)

China insisted Tuesday it was implementing its climate commitments, while signalling no new policies following a UN report warning much more urgent action was needed to fight global warming.

Many world leaders responded to Monday's report, which said climate change was occurring faster than estimated, by calling for decisive and immediate moves to curtail fossil fuels.

When asked for a response to the report, China's foreign ministry emphasised the government's current policies and commitments.

"China has insisted on prioritising sustainable, green and low-carbon development," a spokesperson told AFP in a statement.

The Chinese government has set a target of reaching peak carbon emissions by 2030, and becoming carbon neutral by 2060.

The statement referenced the carbon neutrality target, and said the global community should have full confidence in China's climate actions.

China has been criticised for pushing ahead with opening dozens of new coal power plants to ensure economic growth.

The statement said President Xi Jinping intended to "strictly control" the growth of coal power plants.

But it pointed to a continued increase in the next few years, saying that coal consumption would start to gradually reduce from 2026.

The report, from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), warned that global warming would reach 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels around 2030.

That level of global warming will have devastating impacts on humanity, including more extreme weather events such as fires, typhoons, droughts and floods.





Europe's wildfires also driven by rural flight

It's not just drought and strong winds driving the catastrophic wildfires in southern Europe, fire expert Johann Goldammer says in an interview with DW.



Many people have lost all their belongings because of the fires. Will even more people leave their rural homes now?


Residents and firefighters in southern and southeastern Europe are in a desperate, often futile, battle against wildfires.

As is often the case, the catastrophic fires we're seeing now are being helped by high temperatures, extreme drought and strong winds. And some of that is down to extreme weather, which, according to scientists, climate change is bringing to areas that have been spared in the past.

But Johann Georg Goldammer says it's not just climate change that's raising the risk and threat of these fires.

Goldammer, an international fire expert who heads the Global Fire Monitoring Center, says rural flight has also done its damage. He says that with large numbers of young people leaving rural areas for cities in the Mediterranean, landscapes are changing as they get abandoned ­— often with grave consequences.

DW: There have always been wildfires in the Mediterranean. Why is rural flight increasing the risk of them now?

Johann Georg Goldammer: This exodus from rural areas in the Balkans, Greece and Turkey is an uninterrupted trend. Younger generations are moving to the cities to find work and a better quality of life. And as they move away, those rural areas are getting neglected and rundown, and bit by bit, the old towns are dying away.



Goldammer heads the Global Fire Monitoring Center

All that land used to be farmed, for instance. When it's left, it gets overgrown with grass, shrubs and bushes, trees and eventually turns into woodland. And that's more fuel for fires than we ever got from farmed landed.

So, if we want to do anything to stop the increasing threat of wildfires, then we'll have to focus our efforts on stopping rural flight in southern Europe.

Some countries have already reacted to the effects of rural flight by restructuring wooded areas. Some, for instance, are trying reforestation. Is that a good thing?

It depends on the type of reforestation. In Portugal, for example, they have planted fast-growing trees over vast areas, with the aim of supplying pulp and wood.

That can be exotics, such as pine and eucalyptus trees. Those are high-risk trees because they burn more easily than olive groves or cork oaks that may have been there before. They are cared for intensively and there was usually very little fuel for the fires in between the olive or oak trees.

When it was very hot, animals would take cover in the shade of the trees and at the same time graze on the ground, keeping it free of leaves or grass that might otherwise burn.

And, right now, we are seeing massive fires on the Iberian peninsula, where previously there weren't any, and it's because of these eucalyptus and pine plantations.


Pine and eucalyptus trees burn easily and wildfires in huge plantations are hard to control

In Turkey, a lot of the fires now are in pine plantations. Those wildfires are very hard to control or stop because they burn very intensively. When there's strong, dry wind, it is virtually impossible to stop them.

Aside from these monocultures, there's another approach, where people want to let forests grow as undisturbed as possible. Aren't these "natural" woodlands more resilient against extreme weather and fire?

There's a high level of diversity of vegetation and insect species in undisturbed woodlands, but also a lot of deadwood.

Those woodlands can be extremely vulnerable if there's a heatwave or a fire.

If we want these woodlands to be less at risk of fire, we have to start cultivating them so that there is less fuel for the fires. That will make it easier to control fires. And that's largely possible through agricultural farming and ranching, including controlled grazing.



Granted, that gives us less plant-based biomass, perhaps even less biodiversity than in a species-rich ancient, mixed woodland.

But, for that, these woodlands are more resilient against stress factors, such as fire, drought and storms.

Extreme weather events aren't exclusive to the Mediterranean. We're seeing extreme weather through climate change in many other regions as well. How should we adapt to the new reality?

Well, we've just had heavy rainfall and floods in Germany. On top of that, we're seeing extreme wind events, including tornadoes that we've never had before, and long dry-spells and fire.

All that is having an impact on forests and woodland. We're just going to have to free ourselves of this image of forests as being areas where things grow in a measured and balanced climate and where these extremes hardly ever happen.

We need to make it a priority to turn these areas over to the kind of agricultural farming that will increase a woodland's resilience against drought, strong winds and heavy rainfall.



Save what's left to save. The fires will worsen things for people in structurally weak regions.

So, if we're heading for those climate conditions, such as the ones we're seeing in the Mediterranean or in the subtropics, then we're going to have to take a look at their forests and woodlands.

What do they look like? Are they as dense and rich and high in biomass as our spruces, firs and beechwood? No. They are often open woodlands with very few trees per unit area.

That means that each tree has more ground and water to feed on, and their roots grow deeper. That kind of stability is very important in dry spells and strong winds. Forest pastures can help maintain these stable, "light" woods and reduce fuel for fire.

But it's not only underdeveloped countries that lack the financial means or even the sociopolitical will to adapt to the new realities.

I agree. We're all going through a collective process of learning how to deal with climate change. The whole world, but especially in southern and southeast Europe, those old cultural landscapes are going through a process of change. And a lot of that has to do with the way land is used. That is what's leading to these dangerous and destructive fires.

It is, however, incredibly difficult to get it through to the expedient, fast-paced world of politics that we need long-term solutions. Quickly buying in new technology, like fire engines or water-bomber planes, is so much easier and attractive to politics.

Prof. Dr. Johann Georg Goldammer is a fire ecologist. His research group is part of the Forest Science Faculty at the University of Freiburg and the United Nations University. He is a senior scientist at the Max Planck Society for Chemistry, Biogeochemistry and heads the UN's Global Fire Monitoring Center.

This interview was adapted from German and conducted by Alexander Freund.

THE WORLD IS BURNING
Russia: No sigh of relief
Many regions in Russia have been burning for weeks, with the area around Yakutia in the far northeast having been hit particularly hard. The authorities have counted more than 250 fires currently burning across Russia, covering a total area of more than 3.5 million hectares (8.6 million acres).    1234567


Greece: PM apologizes amid 'unprecedented' wildfires

As wildfires on Greece's Evia island continued to rage, Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has promised compensation amid criticism of the state's handling of the disaster.


Some 650 firefighters have so far been deployed on the island of Evia, according to Greek officials


Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis apologized on Monday amid a backlash against his government's response to the country's devastating wildfires.

Hit by its worst heatwave in decades, Greece has struggled to contain the hundreds of wildfires that have burnt to a cinder pristine pine forests, forcing thousands to flee.

Firefighters were still battling into the night on Monday a massive blaze on Greece's second-largest island, Evia, for the seventh consecutive day.


VIDEO Greek island fire 'unprecedented' disaster

What did Mitsotakis say?

In a televised address, the prime minister said the destruction in Evia and elsewhere "blackens everyone's hearts" and pledged compensation for those affected.

He announced a supplemental budget of €500 million ($587 million) to fund rebuilding, reforesting and compensation.

Mitsotakis also apologized for "any shortcomings" in the state response, vowing to hold those responsible to account.

"I fully understand the pain of our fellow citizens who saw their homes or property burned," Mitsotakis said. "Any failures will be identified. And responsibility will be assigned wherever necessary."

Several mayors had criticized a lack of aerial support in fighting the fires, despite the government's assurances of having set aside ample resources earlier this year.

"We may have done what was humanly possible, but in many cases it was not enough," Mitsotakis said in response. "We are dealing with a natural disaster of unprecedented dimensions."





What is happening in Evia?

The fire raging in Evia since August 3 has been the most severe of the hundreds witnessed across Greece this month.

Residents of the island's northern village of Kamatriades joined emergency crews on Monday to form a human chain as a wall of flames approached their homes.

"Villages are evacuated, but those who can help stay behind," central Greece governor, Fanis Spanos, told state news agency ANA. "Without them, many villages would have burned," Spanos said.

Their work on the ground is necessary at night as firefighting aircraft cannot fly in the dark.


Many of the helpers were armed only with twigs to beat out the approaching flames


Authorities had earlier ordered the evacuation of the nearby village of Avgaria. However, many residents remained determined to stay and defend their homes.

Hundreds of people lost their homes in Evia, greater Athens and other parts of Greece due to the wildfires.

Many of the fires across Greece have stabilized or receded by Monday, but Evia's rugged, forested landscape and wind have helped the blazes rage on the island.




What help is Greece receiving?

Greek authorities said EU member states and other countries have so far sent 21 aircraft, 250 vehicles and over 1,200 firefighters. The aid is set to arrive in the coming days.

PM Mitsotakis said he discussed the delivery of an additional giant BE-200 water bomber with his Russian counterpart Mikhail Mishustin.

Israel and Greece's longtime rival Turkey also pledged firefighting aircraft.

At least 56,655 hectares (140,000 acres) were burnt in Greece from July 29 to August 7, according to the European Forest Fire Information System.

Wildfires ravage Athens' 'green lung,' fueling anger and despair

Greece has managed to partially contain wildfires that raged for days in the Athens suburbs. What remains are burned forests, thousands of people without homes and a government without a plan. DW's Barbara Wesel reports.


Residents and volunteers pitched in to help fight the flames on a hill in the Mount Parnitha national park


The hill near Mount Parnitha outside Athens, a national park and the capital's green lung, has been Irini's home for decades. This is where she grew up and where she wants to stay. As the wildfires drew ever closer in recent days, police brought the residents to safety. But a day later, Irini is back, trudging slowly but doggedly up the street with her walker.

"Tell the firefighters to throw water on my house; I want to go back," she pleads. Police officers come and try to take her away. "No, I'm not leaving here; I live here," the old lady says defiantly.



Irini, who has lived in the Mount Parnitha national park all her life, refuses to leave

The younger residents, meanwhile, have taken matters into their own hands as they fight to save their homes and forests. Hundreds of volunteers are trying to help with the firefighting efforts.

One group has managed to get hold of an old truck with a pump from a farmer. Ten men drag a large hose up the slope; the first flames are already leaping up the back of it. The residents are driven by a courage born of despair. They are aware that if they don't manage to put out the fires in this small patch of forest, the flames will soon race towards their houses.

At the end of the road, there is a clear view of the former royal gardens of Tatoi. "That was a paradise, with rare trees, peacocks and game," one ash-smeared resident says, "and look at it now. It's like a moonscape. Everything is burned."

Meanwhile, Jorgos and other neighbors are using picks and shovels to try to prevent the fires from flaring up again. Once the fire has raged across the forest, the hot ground reignites again and tree stumps can smolder for weeks. All it takes is one gust of wind for the fires to restart.

Government faces backlash

"The whole area here is burning down! We have lost the best part of Athens. We grew up here, and it hurts us so much to see this," Jorgos says.

Like the other residents, he is angry at the government. Everyone had known for years that the fires were getting more and more severe, he said. "Why are there so few firefighters and fire trucks and only two firefighting planes?" Jorgos says.

Nelli, from the neighboring village of Krioneri, agrees. "All the government does is appear on TV, all spiffed up and polished, and tell us that it's a great success that we don't all die in the fires," he says. "They should have hired firefighters instead of thousands of new police officers."

Indeed, the evacuation of the affected areas is the only thing that has worked well in recent days. In 2018, a catastrophic fire in the Athens suburb of Mati killed more than 100 people. This time, the authorities at least had a plan for getting residents to safety.

Sweltering weather and strong winds have helped drive the wildfires close to Athens

But the same can't be said of the firefighting effort. It took days for the army to be called in to help. The operation was hobbled by outdated fire trucks and an overall lack of equipment.

"We haven't slept in three days. It's like a war; we're beat, but we keep going. You can't just watch this," an exhausted firefighter says. The fire was fueled by a number of factors. First it was temperatures of over 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit), then strong winds that fanned the fire even across the closed Highway 1 heading north. The highway was supposed to prevent the fire from spreading to other parts of the city.

By the end of last week, help had arrived from the rest of Europe to bolster firefighting efforts. The aid included a few water-bombing planes, vehicles and firefighters from France, Bulgaria, Slovakia and other countries.

Around Mount Parnithos, Cypriots are helping local forces. ”The situation is really difficult," Dimitris Katzivlis, head of the operation, says. "It's tragic! We are helping our Greek colleagues here, but it is worse than we expected."


The highway failed to act as a firebreak


An economic and environmental blow

Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis is under pressure and is trying to reassure citizens. Everything will be done to compensate the victims of the fires, he has said. But his government faces an uphill task.

A devastating fire on the island of Euboea off Athens has hit hundreds of farmers hard, destroying their livelihoods. The farmers are furious and feel let down because they say the government is focusing scarce resources on the capital, leaving the island to burn down.

But in the suburbs around Athens, too, many have lost everything. They are now waiting in reception camps for the promised aid from the government.

The wildfires come at a time when Greece faces a precarious economic situation. The country had just recovered from the aftermath of the financial crisis when the COVID-19 pandemic hit. And now, just as tourism was limping back to business, the fires have dealt another blow to the economy.

The government can request emergency aid for natural disasters from Brussels. Beyond that, however, the billions from the coronavirus recovery fund may be the only salvation. These funds are supposed to be used, in particular, for the ecological transition of member countries.

But Greece has so far failed to outline an overarching plan to move towards a greener future. There is a lack of environmental awareness, and the country has no "green" party in parliament. Electricity producers have already warned that energy prices will rise by 15% in September. Some 2,000 power poles have burned down and parts of the grid have been destroyed. An old coal-fired power plant had to be restarted to meet demand. Greece, which receives abundant sunshine, is also a laggard when it comes to renewable energies.

Mitsotakis has promised that "the forest that burned down outside Athens will be replanted." But that's far from easy.


The evacuations were the only thing that worked well

"This here was original, pristine forest," Dimitri, a resident who is standing in the ashes near Mount Parnitha with his shovel, says. You can't just replant it like that, he says, and it will take at least 20 years for the trees to grow back.

Next winter, he says, the next disaster is already lined up, when rains wash the bare soil from the hills, triggering landslides that could sweep the remnants of the forest down into the valley.

The fires are an environmental disaster to which the country currently has no political answers.

This article has been translated from German.

 fb/jsi (AFP, AP, dpa, Reuters)


#P3 WATER IS LIFE NOT FOR PROFIT
Australia’s Macquarie buys £1bn majority stake in Southern Water

Aug 10, 2021 | News


The Australian investment bank Macquarie has returned to the UK water industry – four and a half years after leaving Thames Water saddled with debt – buying a majority stake in Southern Water for more than £1bn.

The infrastructure investor promised to put the utility firm “back on a stable footing” after it was fined a record £90m last month for dumping billions of litres of raw sewage off the north Kent and Hampshire coasts.

An investigation found that Southern Water had deliberately poured the sewage into the sea to avoid financial penalties and the cost of upgrading and maintaining infrastructure.


The company is responsible for supplying water to 2.6m customers and provides wastewater services to 4.7m customers across Kent, Sussex, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.

Macquarie said that by injecting more than £1bn in new equity to recapitalise the business, Southern would be able to invest in fixing the faulty pipes, pumping stations and sewers, which are causing harm to the local environment.

Ian McAulay, the chief executive of Southern Water, said Macquarie’s investment was “good news for our customers, the local environment and the regional economy”.

“It strengthens our ability to tackle the longer-term challenges posed by climate change and population growth, at the same time as being responsible custodians of Southern England’s rivers and seas,” he said.


The bank sold its stake in Britain’s biggest water supplier, Thames Water, in 2017 after a decade in which Macquarie earned billions from the company through dividends and paid next to no corporation tax.

Macquarie sold its final stake in Thames for an estimated £1.35bn, just months before the Environment Agency prosecuted the utility company for extensive pollution in the Thames and other rivers between 2012 and 2014. At the time the £20m fine was a record for such this kind of offence.

In a letter published on Monday, Ofwat, the water industry regulator, warned Macquarie that “very profound changes” would be required at Southern Water.

Jonson Cox, Ofwat’s chair, added that the water industry had made strides in recent years to bring investor returns in line with customer service and eliminate complicated corporate structures and financial arrangements. Macquarie used such mechanisms to load Thames with debt to pay hefty dividends and no tax.

“You have confirmed that you support these aims,” Cox said. “You have recognised that Southern Water’s customers deserve better service, and you have set out your ambition for Southern Water to be a well-performing business in the next regulatory period and for the company to be able to operate in line with Ofwat’s expectations for the whole sector.”

On Saturday, an incident involving a Southern water overflow prompted Canterbury council to warn the public not to swim off a section of the Kent coast near Whitstable.

Leigh Harrison, the head of Macquarie’s infrastructure division, said its long-term investment in the company would put Southern “back on a stable footing” and enable “an ambitious multi-year transformation plan” to make the company more sustainable and resilient.

In response to Ofwat’s letter, Harrison said that while Southern should make “substantial progress in addressing its issues by the end of 2025”, the full transformation “will take time”.

The public outcry prompted by Thames’s track record under Macquarie’s ownership was one of the key drivers behind calls for the regional water company monopolies to be taken back into public ownership, which was a Labour party manifesto pledge for the 2019 election.

Pascale Robinson from We Own It, which campaigns against private ownership, said Macquarie’s previous ownership of Thames set “a worrying precedent” for its ownership of Southern Water.

“Macquarie may be promising to use their stake to stop sewage leaks but we can’t trust them to be true to their word, given that they were responsible for Thames Water’s extensive pollution of the Thames in 2014-16,” he said. “To stop the rip-off that is private companies profiting off a basic human necessity, and to hold Southern Water to account, we need to bring water back into public ownership throughout the UK.”


Source: The Guardian

 THINKING WITH YOUR GUT

New insights into how the ‘first brain’ works in the gut


New research explains how the gut nervous system causes propulsion

Peer-Reviewed Publication

FLINDERS UNIVERSITY

New research explains how the nervous system in the gut, known as the enteric nervous system (ENS) causes propulsion along the gut, highlighting how similar it behaves to other neural networks in the brain and spinal cord.

The study, led by Professor Nick Spencer at Flinders University, maintains that the ENS in the gut is the 'first brain' and that it evolved long before the brain as we know it, in humans. The new findings uncover major new information about how the many thousands of neurons in the ENS communicate with each other to cause the muscle layers to contract and propel content.  Until now, this had been a major unresolved issue.

In a new paper in Communications Biology (Nature), Flinders University Professor Nick Spencer, says the latest findings are far more complex than expected and considerably different from the mechanisms that underlie the propulsion of fluid along other muscle organs that have evolved without an intrinsic nervous system; like in lymphatic vessels, ureters or the portal vein.

"Synchronisation of neuronal activity across large populations of neurons is common in the nervous system of many vertebrate animals," Professor Spencer says.

The researchers took advantage of a recent technical advance from their laboratory which enabled them to record the smooth muscle electrical activity along the length of colon at the same time as correlating electrical activities with dynamic changes in colonic wall diameter, during propulsion.

This process has revealed a key new mechanism that finally explains how all the different types of neurons in the ENS come together and coordinate the firing to generate propulsion of content along the colon.

“Interestingly, the same neural circuit was activated during both propulsive and non-propulsive contractions.”

###

 #MEDICAREFORALL      #SINGLEPAYERNOW

Study reveals Black recipients of liver transplants have lower post-transplant survival rates than white or Hispanic patients


Despite interventions to improve life expectancy, outcomes for liver recipients who are Black have worsened over time; the biggest factors in disparity are alcohol-associated liver disease and insurance type

Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - HEALTH SCIENCES

Brian P. Lee, MD, MAS, a hepatologist and liver transplant specialist with Keck Medicine of USC 

IMAGE: BRIAN P. LEE, MD, MAS, A HEPATOLOGIST AND LIVER TRANSPLANT SPECIALIST WITH KECK MEDICINE OF USC, IS THE LEAD AUTHOR OF THE STUDY. view more 

CREDIT: PHOTO COURTESY OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

LOS ANGELES — A new study from Keck Medicine of USC reveals that Black recipients of liver transplants have lower post-transplant survival rates than white or Hispanic patients.

When examining data from the last two decades of all liver transplant recipients in the United States, Brian P. Lee, MD, MAS, a hepatologist and liver transplant specialist with Keck Medicine, and his colleagues discovered that during the entire study period of 2002-2018, Black patients had, on average, a 15% higher chance of dying after a liver transplant than white or Hispanic patients. And from 2017-2018, they had a 60% higher chance of dying after a liver transplant than white recipients of liver transplants. The survival gap between Black patients and white patients increased with the number of years post-transplant.

The findings persisted even after the researchers statistically adjusted the results for a number of demographic and health factors, including where a patient lived, their insurance type, if they had diabetes and severity of liver disease.

Additionally, the study found that Black recipients had a higher severity of liver disease at the time of transplant and tended to die more often from acute or chronic organ rejection than white patients.

“We were very surprised by these results because almost 20 years ago, a landmark study showed that Black patients who underwent liver transplants had lower post-transplant survival rates than white and Hispanic patients, and since then, the field has made numerous interventions to try to narrow the gap,” said Lee. “It is eye-opening that not only does this disparity still exist, it’s gotten worse.”  

In comparing the results of the new study with the landmark one of 20 years ago, researchers discovered that the survival gap initially narrowed between 2002-2009, was unchanged in 2010-2013, and then worsened from 2013-2018.

When searching for the reasons behind the study findings, researchers discovered two modest — but significant — factors in the disparity between the outcomes of Black and white patients.

The first was alcohol-associated liver disease — liver damage as the result of heavy alcohol consumption before the transplant.

“The proportion of alcohol-associated liver disease among Black liver-transplant recipients almost doubled from 2002-2005 to 2014-2018, outpacing a 36% relative increase in the disease among white liver-transplant recipients,” Lee said. In addition, Black liver-transplant recipients with alcohol-associated liver disease had a lower survival rate than white liver-transplant recipients with alcohol-associated liver disease.

The second biggest factor was the type of insurance the patient had. Black recipients were more likely to be insured through Medicaid rather than private insurance when compared to white patients. Liver recipients with private insurance had higher survival rates than those with Medicaid.

For the study, researchers analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, which tracks all organ transplants in the United States. They studied the post-transplant life expectancy of approximately 47,000 Black, Hispanic and white liver transplant recipients between 2002 and 2018, the last year for which adequate survival data is available. Black patients were identified as non-Hispanic Black and white transplant recipients as non-Hispanic white.

Lee hopes the study will encourage further research into how issues such as alcohol use and social determinants of health affect organ transplant outcomes.

“Our findings are a huge wake-up call that physicians and other health care professionals need to do better in delivering equitable care,” said Lee. “Hopefully we can begin to invest in interventions that acknowledge previously undiscovered causes of inequity that will successfully narrow the disparity gap in liver transplant survival rates.”

Norah Terrault, MD, a Keck Medicine gastroenterologist and division chief of gastroenterology and liver diseases at the Keck School of Medicine of USC, and Jennifer Dodge, MPH, an assistant professor of research medicine and population and public health sciences at the Keck School, were also study authors.

 

###

For more information about Keck Medicine of USC, please visit news.KeckMedicine.org.

Disclaimer: AAAS an

 

Will the large-scale vaccination succeed in containing the COVID-19 pandemic and how soon?


Peer-Reviewed Publication

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS

Will the large-scale vaccination succeed in containing the COVID-19 pandemic and how soon? 

IMAGE: OPTIMAL VACCINATION PARAMETERS TO ACHIEVE HERD IMMUNITY view more 

CREDIT: SHILEI ZHAO, TONG SHA, CHUNG-I WU, YONGBIAO XUE, HUA CHEN

The availability of vaccines provides a promising solution to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it remains unclear whether the large-scale vaccination can succeed in containing the COVID-19 pandemic and how soon. According to a study conducted by scientists from Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (China National Center for Bioinformation), vaccination alone cannot stop the pandemic in some scenarios, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are necessary to complement vaccination and accelerate the end of the pandemic. The article has been published online on May 20, 2021, in the open access journal Quantitative Biology under Higher Education Press.

The study developed an epidemic model to explore pandemic dynamics under vaccination and NPI scenarios, explicitly parameterized key factors related to vaccination, including the duration of immunity, vaccine efficacy, and daily vaccination rate, etc. The model was applied to the daily reported numbers of confirmed cases of Israel and the USA to explore and predict trends under vaccination based on their current epidemic statuses and intervention measures.

“In Israel, over half of the population was fully vaccinated yet, and under the current vaccination scheme, the pandemic was predicted to end between May 14, 2021 and August 26, 2021, assuming immunity persists for 180 days to 365 days and with or with no NPIs. For the USA, if we assume the current vaccination rate (0.268% per day) and intensity of NPIs, the pandemic will end between January 20, 2022, and October 19, 2024, assuming immunity persists for 180 days to 365 days. However, assuming immunity persists for 180 days and no NPIs are implemented, the pandemic will not end and instead reach an equilibrium state, with a proportion of the population remaining actively infected.” Dr. Chen said.

Overall, the daily vaccination rate should be decided according to vaccine efficacy and immunity duration to achieve herd immunity. In some situations, vaccination alone cannot stop the pandemic, and NPIs are necessary to supplement vaccination and accelerate the end of the pandemic. Considering that vaccine efficacy and duration of immunity may be reduced for new mutant strains, it is necessary to remain cautiously optimistic about the prospect of ending the pandemic under vaccination.

 

About Higher Education Press

Founded in May 1954, Higher Education Press Limited Company (HEP), affiliated with the Ministry of Education, is one of the earliest institutions committed to educational publishing after the establishment of P. R. China in 1949. After striving for six decades, HEP has developed into a major comprehensive publisher, with products in various forms and at different levels. Both for import and export, HEP has been striving to fill in the gap of domestic and foreign markets and meet the demand of global customers by collaborating with more than 200 partners throughout the world and selling products and services in 32 languages globally. Now, HEP ranks among China's top publishers in terms of copyright export volume and the world's top 50 largest publishing enterprises in terms of comprehensive strength.

The Frontiers Journals series published by HEP includes 28 English academic journals, covering the largest academic fields in China at present. Among the series, 13 have been indexed by SCI, 6 by EI, 2 by MEDLINE, 1 by A&HCI. HEP's academic monographs have won about 300 different kinds of publishing funds and awards both at home and abroad.

About Quantitative Biology

Quantitative Biology (QB) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on original research that uses quantitative approaches and technologies to analyze and integrate biological systems, construct and model engineered life systems, and gain a deep understanding of the life sciences. The journal publishes research, review, method, protocol/tutorial article in the broad fields of bioinformatics, computational biology, systems biology and synthetic biology.

THE WAR ON VAPING

Vaping just once raises oxidative stress levels in nonsmokers, increasing disease risk


New study findings ‘are clear, unambiguous and concerning,’ UCLA researcher says

Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - LOS ANGELES HEALTH SCIENCES

The risk that both tobacco and electronic cigarettes can pose to regular smokers’ health has been well documented, but a new UCLA study illustrates just how quickly vaping can affect the cells of even healthy younger nonsmokers.

The findings, published on Monday in JAMA Pediatrics, show that a single 30-minute vaping session can significantly increase cellular oxidative stress, which occurs when the body has an imbalance between free radicals — molecules that can cause damage to cells — and antioxidants, which fight free radicals.

“Over time, this imbalance can play a significant role in causing certain illnesses, including cardiovascular, pulmonary and neurological diseases, as well as cancer,” said the study’s senior author, Dr. Holly Middlekauff, a professor of cardiology and physiology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

E-cigarettes, devices that deliver nicotine with flavoring and other chemicals in a vapor rather than smoke, are seen by many as a safer alternative to regular cigarettes, but research by Middlekauff and others has demonstrated that vaping is associated with a number of adverse changes in the body that can presage future health problems. 

For the current study, 32 male and female study participants, who ranged in age from 21 to 33, were divided into three groups: 11 nonsmokers, nine regular tobacco cigarette smokers and 12 regular e-cigarette smokers. Middlekauff and her colleagues collected immune cells from each individual before and after a half-hour vaping session to measure and compare changes in oxidative stress among the groups.

The researchers performed the same process during a control session in which participants spent 30 minutes “sham-vaping,” or puffing on an empty straw.

They found that in nonsmokers, oxidative stress levels were two to four times higher after the vaping session than before. The same 30-minute exposure did not lead to an increase in oxidative stress among the regular cigarette and e-cigarette smokers, the researchers noted, most likely because their baseline levels of oxidative stress were already elevated.

“We were surprised by the gravity of the effect that one vaping session can have on healthy young people, “Middlekauff said. “This brief vaping session was not dissimilar to what they may experience at a party, yet the effects were dramatic.”

The results are especially troubling, the researchers say, because the popularity of vaping continues to increase, particularly among teens and young adults. According to a 2020 study, nearly 1 in 3 high school students reported that they had used an e-cigarette during the previous month.

There is still more to be understood about what exactly causes the changes in oxidative stress levels — whether it is the nicotine or non-nicotine elements in e-cigarettes — the researchers say. Middlekauff and her team will continue to explore this question in future research.

“While there’s a perception that e-cigarettes are safer than tobacco cigarettes, these findings show clearly and definitively that there is no safe level of vaping,” Middlekauff said. “The results are clear, unambiguous and concerning.”

Other authors of the study included Dr. Theodoros Kelesidis, Elizabeth Tran, Randy Nguyen, Yuyan Zhang and Grace Sosa, all of UCLA.

The research was supported in part by the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program of California and the National Institutes of Health.

 

Why people snub their friends with their phone


Mental health conditions and certain personality traits play a role in ‘phubbing’

Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA

Smartphones have made multi-tasking easier, more understandable, and at times compulsive. But in social settings, these devices can lead to a form of contemporary rudeness called phone snubbing, or phubbing, the act of ignoring one’s companions to pay attention to a phone.

While it may be commonplace, snubbing one’s friends (Fphubbing) can have serious repercussions on relationships, and there are a variety of factors that may drive individuals to ignore their friends in favor of an electronic screen, according to a new University of Georgia study.

The study reveals positive associations between depression and social anxiety on increasing Fphubbing: depressed people are likely to phub their friends more frequently, and socially anxious people, who might prefer online social interactions to face-to-face communication, might also exhibit more phubbing behavior. Personality traits such as neuroticism also influence phubbing behavior.

“And of course, some people who have high social anxiety or depression are more likely to be addicted to their smartphone,” said Juhyung Sun, lead author on the paper who completed her master’s degree in communication studies at UGA.

The very ordinariness of phubbing suggests some fundamental insights about how technology interrupts social interactions – and how quickly they are accepted, if not embraced.

“I observed that so many people use their phones while they are sitting with their friends at the cafe, any dining time, regardless of the relationship type,” said Sun, currently a doctoral candidate at the University of Oklahoma.

She first considered some negative reasons behind phubbing – smart phone addiction and relatedly, the habit of constantly reading notifications that pop up onscreen.

“People are really sensitive to their notifications. With each buzz or sound, we consciously or unconsciously look at our phones,” she said, noting that the device’s wide utility across applications – from weather to breaking news, are key drivers fostering this dynamic. 

A third significant finding in the study revealed that agreeable individuals have a lower instance of phubbing in the presence of their friends. People who have agreeableness as a personality trait tend to show cooperative, polite and friendly behaviors in their interpersonal relationships and social settings, Sun said. 

“They have a high tendency to maintain social harmony while avoiding arguments that can ruin their relationships.,” she said. “In face-to-face conversations, people with high levels of agreeableness consider phubbing behavior rude and impolite to their conversational partners.” 

And though agreeable people may prioritize strong friendships, an exploratory study by the researchers revealed phubbing also to be more likely in the presence of three or more people.

That dynamic may influence the prevalence of phubbing in the context of a work environment

“It’s ironic that while so many people believe that phubbing behavior is rude, they still do it,” Sun said. “A majority of people phub others, and in a group, it may seem OK, because it’s just me, the speaker doesn’t notice I’m using the phone. The number of a people in a group can be one reason.”

Alternately, disabling or turning over a phone can indicate a show of respect for a situation and focus on a person.

“That, too, is a signal – I am listening to what you are saying, this meeting is important and I am focusing on you,” Sun said.

Jennifer Samp, professor in the UGA Franklin College of Arts and Sciences department communication studies and Sun’s advisor on the project, believes that the act of Fphubbing may have even greater implications once the larger public returns to face-to-face interactions after the pandemic subsides. 

“People relied heavily on phones and other technologies to stay connected during the pandemic,” Samp said. “For many, staying connected in a more distanced manner via texts and video messaging was more comfortable than face-to-face interaction. Will people – particularly anxious ones – still phubb when physically reunited? Time will tell.” 

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of n

 

Trials of growing old in Georgian England revealed

Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE

Previous studies of suicide in the 1700s have focussed on societal attitudes rather than the experiences of people who took their own lives. These suicides have largely been described as ‘medicalised’ acts driven by lunacy. By contrast, University of Cambridge historian Ella Sbaraini argues that many older people in this period linked their suicidal thoughts to their struggles with pain, loneliness and dependency in old age.

The study, published in the journal Social History of Medicine, brings to light startling evidence from 106 coroners’ inquests into the suicides of older people, uncovered in archives in London, Kent, Cumbria, Essex, Suffolk and Bath.  

The records highlight distressing issues facing older people in the 1700s which remain major concerns today including memory loss, loneliness, financial and occupational vulnerability, and worrying about becoming a burden.

The depositions made during coroners inquests in the 1700s closely recorded the words spoken by witnesses who were free to disclose a wide variety of details about the person who had taken their own life. They often reported, verbatim, words spoken by the deceased over the previous days, weeks and months. While coroners’ juries gave 97% of the cases surveyed in this study a formal verdict of insanity, or non compos mentis, Sbaraini shows that this is not how many of them viewed themselves.

Sbaraini says: “The people described in these documents were suffering from a range of age-related illnesses and disabilities, as well as distressing social and financial problems. Many showed great determination to seek out help but they lived at a time when the kind of support now available just wasn’t there.  

“The tragic experiences of many older people in the 1700s emphasise the importance of health and social care today, but also the power of community. The Covid-19 pandemic has hit older people extremely hard, leaving many feeling isolated and powerless. History reminds us how important it is to make sure older people feel a strong sense of purpose and a valued part of society.”   

The study defines ‘older’ people as those aged 50 and over in line with perceptions in the eighteenth century. In this period, less than one-fifth of people lived beyond 50 years and the age was associated with the onset of infirmity.

Today psychological autopsies involving interviews with family members and health professionals are used to determine the background and potential reasons for someone’s suicide. For the 1700s, coroners’ inquests offer similarly valuable retrospective information which, Sbaraini argues, can help us understand what people were going through in the lead-up to their deaths.

Three-quarters of the 106 suicides examined were carried out by men, and the study identifies male anxieties about declining employability, often expressed through ideas about ‘lameness’, as an ‘extremely significant’ factor. As late as 1817, over 80% of employed men worked in sectors dominated by jobs requiring strength and/or dexterity, qualities which generally declined in later life.

These worries are poignantly recorded in the case of Isaac Hendley, a man in his sixties, who took his own life in Shoreditch in 1797. Witnesses confirmed that Hendley often expressed ‘his apprehension that he should come to want’ and ‘that he should be incapable of working’ as a shoemaker. He was afraid that he would be forced to enter a workhouse, a humiliating fate for a once self-reliant man. Hendley’s anxiety arose because he ‘complained of several bodily infirmities’ and ‘used to say he was afraid he should lose the use of his Limbs’.

Two years later, when Thomas Emperor, an older ‘under Porter’ serving the Prince of Wales was found dead in London, his colleagues testified that he was very concerned about being dismissed, fearing: ‘he should be turned out of his place and that then he should die in a Ditch like a Dog and be buried in a Ditch like a Dog’. Unusually, the jury gave a verdict of ‘death by misfortune’, probably to avoid a royal scandal, Sbaraini suggests.

Older suicidal men often expressed anxiety about the irreversible direction of their bodily decline, and its relation to dependency and degradation. This is apparent in the case of James Nicholas, an older labouring man took his own life in Suffolk in 1792, after becoming fixated on a painful ankle which made him ‘at times burst into Tears and say he feared he never should be well again and should come to want’.

While the majority of people surveyed were of lower and middling status, there is evidence of wealthy individuals also struggling in older age. Thomas Norman, a gentleman who took his own life in London’s St James’s in 1771, was, according to his apothecary, ‘upon every illness … effected by a great Dejection of Spirits’. In his will, Norman left this apothecary £1000, a huge sum at the time, in recognition of his efforts to alleviate his suffering.

Another elderly gentleman, John Braithwaite, who died in Cumbria in 1803, was most troubled by his memory-loss and confusion. He forgot simple words and felt frustrated that he could not express what he wanted to say. During a fishing trip, he forgot where he had left his horse and when playing cards with friends he ‘broke out into a most Violent Frenzy without any cause … and behaved in so Frantic a Manner that [his friend] was obliged to Carry him home’. Braithwaite asked his servants to stay up all night in case he needed anything and pleaded with one to end his life – she refused.

Sbaraini says: “While memory loss, confusion and behaviour changes are now well-known signs of Dementia, there was far less understanding and support available in the 1700s. For independent, respected people to lose their grip on the behaviours expected by their community, including politeness and self-control, must have been extremely distressing.”

Disclaimer: AAAS and