Thursday, September 09, 2021

Federal election candidates 'eerily silent' on climate change, says Cape Breton task force

Wed., September 8, 2021, 

A climate change rally held in London in February 2019. Environmentalists in Cape Breton says there has not been enough discussion on the federal election campaign trail about important environmental issues. (Shutterstock / Ben Gingell - image credit)

A Cape Breton group says there's been little discussion about the environment during the federal election campaign despite reaching a critical point in the fight against the impacts of climate change.

"It's eerily silent. Eerily silent," said Janet Bickerton, a member of Cape Breton's Climate Change Task Force.

"I'm just amazed at how little conversation there is about climate. I just think it's so overwhelming."

The task force was formed last November and is made up of individuals and organizations concerned about environmental degradation.

'We need to say what matters to us'

Bickerton said many people are feeling anxious about the impacts of climate change to the point that they're blocking it out of their minds.

Erin Pottie/CBC

"It's almost so big that people feel muted, that you barely hear a conversation about it," she said.

"That is really most concerning because what we have is our voice ... We have power in our voices, but we need to come together. We need to speak and we need to say what matters to us."

Pushing for discussion


Group members want the climate to be prioritized in the lead-up to the Sept. 20 vote.

Bickerton said eligible voters should dig into how political parties plan to tackle environmental issues, and use that information to inform their choice at the ballot box.

"[For] most people in my generation, eco-anxiety has been second nature to us," said task force co-ordinator Suvir Singh, who is in his early 30s.

"We've been overloaded with information about how climate change is really affecting our lives and a lot of us don't have the platform to do a lot about it."

Rally planned for Friday

Singh said people who want action on climate change can attend a rally planned for downtown Sydney on Friday. It is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m. AT outside the Civic Centre.

The executive director of ACAP Cape Breton, a Sydney-based environmental non-profit, said the island is already seeing the impacts of climate change.

Kathleen Aikens said the rally follows an August report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that was later described by the United Nations' secretary general as a "code red for humanity."

Panel experts warn that continued sea level rise is already irreversible for centuries to millennia, but there is still time to lessen climate impacts.

"We are facing sea level rise at nearly twice the rate of the average global sea rise," said Aikens.

"We are facing extreme weather events like storms, flash flooding and major precipitation events. There's also coastal erosion both from these extreme weather events as well as a lack of sea ice."

Acting before it's too late


Task force member Albert Marshall said now is the time for governments to find solutions before time runs out for future generations.

The Mi'kmaw elder suggested the province develop a land-based training program in public schools where young people spend more time in nature.

"We have to somehow find a way to amplify our voices by reminding the government and the policymakers that we have actually exhausted the current capacity of the system," Marshall said.

"We have reached a point of no return."

Regina rally calls for federal party leaders to make climate change action a top priority ahead of election

Wed., September 8, 2021, 

People attending a rally in downtown Regina on Wednesday demanded federal party leaders make climate change action a priority. (Matthew Howard/CBC - image credit)

Michelle Brass says she no longer wants promises from politicians about addressing climate change. She's looking for "real commitment to real action starting immediately."

Brass was one of about 100 people who gathered in downtown Regina on Wednesday to call on federal leaders to make climate change action a top priority heading into the election.

The rally was one of about 60 that were scheduled to take place around the country ahead of the leaders debates.

People from several groups including Fridays for Future, Regina EnviroCollective and Indigenous Climate Action spoke at the event in Regina.

Brass, who's part of Indigenous Climate Action and was one of the speakers, told CBC News she wants a detailed plan on how leaders would address climate change in a variety of sectors.

"We need to be hearing about how we make decisions when it comes to addressing the climate crisis through our economy, through our education, through health care, through environmental protections, through all areas of life," she said.

"We can't have incremental change. What is required right now is a comprehensive plan that impacts all facets of life, and no effective climate policy or action can be effective if it doesn't encapsulate all elements of life in society, because it requires such drastic change."


Matt Howard/CBC

Another emphasis of the rally was to stop fossil fuel expansion and have a robust plan to transition to renewable energy.

Josh Campbell, a member of Regina Energy Transition and Wascana Solar Co-operative who also spoke at the event, said any plan needs to support people who work in the fossil fuel industry while ensuring everyone has access to renewable energy.

"It's important for us to think about the workers and the people who are in industry and need to change industries and — at the same time — consider folks who might be left behind in an energy transition," he said.

"Some of these renewables are costly and so government needs to support programs that will help everyone transition."

In the meantime, Campbell said one way to cut down on emissions and help lower income people is for the city to provide fare-free public transit.

Brass, agreed that a plan needs to support fossil fuel workers during the transition, but also said there needs to be an emphasis on Indigenous sovereignty and land protection, which she said often comes as an afterthought.

"When we're looking at how we restructure society… that must always include indigenous sovereignty and the way we operate our lands and territories."

Protesters in Vancouver demand federal candidates make climate crisis a top priority

Wed., September 8, 2021

Khalid Boudreau was among the crowd of climate activists at Wednesday's rally at Hamilton Street and West Georgia in downtown Vancouver.
 (Maggie MacPherson/CBC - image credit)

Dozens of people at a protest in downtown Vancouver Wednesday called on candidates in the Sept. 20 federal election to make the climate crisis a priority.

Khalid Boudreau, 22, was among the all-ages crowd at Hamilton Street and West Georgia to demand the government take swift action. He says witnessing this summer's unprecedented heat waves created a bleak picture.

"It's scary. You have these overlapping crises ... the heat wave killing hundreds of people, then there's affordability issues, the climate crisis and of course the pandemic. It's only going to get worse, if we don't act now," Boudreau said with emotion.

Esmé Decker, 19, is a University of British Columbia student who says this will be the first federal election in which she is eligible to vote.

"With the recent air quality issues and climate change hitting close to home, it has made it even more pressing for me to get involved and make sure everybody is making climate a priority," says Decker. "It's about making sure our voices are heard and showing politicians, climate change is an issue that matters to people."


Maggie MacPherson/CBC

Connor Roff is one of the organizers of Wednesday's Canada on Fire Day of Action.

"The main thing is to not allow yourself to feel hopeless and helpless. We really want to put climate action at the forefront of every political party's campaign. Canada is literally on fire. We have to put a stop to it," says Roff.

Protestors at the rally say they will keep politicians accountable for the promises they make.


Maggie MacPherson/CBC

Canada's political parties climate change plans

Canada's six major parties have all proposed climate change plans within their election platforms.

The Liberals, claim that with a national price on carbon and other measures, they can cut Canada's greenhouse gas emissions by 40 to 45 per cent below 2005 levels, by 2030. They have pledged to ensure the oil and gas sector cuts emissions at the pace required to hit net-zero in 2050.

The Conservatives opposed the Liberals' net-zero emissions legislation and say their climate plan will meet Paris climate commitments of 30 per cent below 2005 levels, by 2030.

New Democrats supported the Liberals' net-zero legislation and have set an emissions reduction target of 50 per cent below 2005 levels, by 2030.

The Bloc Québécois says it wants to meet and exceed the Paris climate agreement targets, redirect unspent money on the Trans Mountain pipeline to renewable projects, and compel provinces that have emissions higher than the national average to pay into a "green equalization" fund, to be distributed to provinces with less pollution.

The Green Party wants to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 60 per cent below 2005 levels, by 2030, and says it will create "clear" and "enforceable" targets and timelines by 2023. If elected, the party would cancel pipeline projects, ban fracking and put tariffs on imports from countries with weak climate policies.

The People's Party argues that there is "no scientific consensus" that human activity is driving climate change and has said warnings of looming environmental catastrophe are exaggerated. The party would withdraw Canada from the Paris climate accord and abandon what it calls "unrealistic" targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.


Maggie MacPherson/CBC

Worried for the future

Looking down at her young son with tears in her eyes, Christina Reed said if the government does not act soon, there will be no future for him.

"There is no point in hanging our heads, saying we've always done it this way or nothing can change. It is the most important issue for the election coming up, and it's not getting the attention it deserves. Without a planet, we don't have anything."

Following the rally, protestors marched down Hamilton street, waving their signs and chanting for change.

British Columbians were just one of 60 communities to join in the day of action, ahead of the federal party leaders' official election debates on Wednesday and Thursday nights..



Support for vaccine passports up in Alberta, Saskatchewan despite premiers' opposition, poll suggests

Wed., September 8, 2021, 

Jonathan Gagne, manager of Orangetheory Fitness, scans the QR code of a client's COVID-19 vaccine passport in Montreal, on Sept. 1, 2021. Alberta has not followed other provinces in implementing a proof-of-vaccination system but a recent poll suggests a majority of respondents support such a policy. (Graham Hughes/Canadian Press - image credit)

A national survey suggests that the majority of respondents in Alberta and Saskatchewan support proof of vaccination in public spaces — despite both provinces' premiers resisting the idea in the past.

In Alberta, which had 152 people respond to the survey, 54 per cent of respondents agreed that mandatory proof of vaccination in public places was a good idea. That was up from 48 per cent in May and after dipping to just 40 per cent in July, before the third wave took hold.

In neighbouring Saskatchewan, where Premier Scott Moe has said his government will not be requiring proof of vaccination to visit businesses or participate in public activities, 51 per cent of the 125 people who responded to the poll supported requiring proof of vaccination — compared with 46 per cent in May.

The online poll by the Angus Reid Institute surveyed 1,709 Canadians from Sept. 3 to Sept. 6 on vaccine passports and incentives, among other issues.

Dave Korzinski, research director at Angus Reid, says since spring, support for mandatory vaccination in public spaces has grown by 15 percentage points nationwide — from 55 per cent in May to 70 per cent in early September.

"In May, we started asking about mandatory vaccination. It has always been relatively high for international travel purposes, travelling to the U.S., getting on any sort of airline flight," he said.

This time around, Korzinski said, at least two-thirds of respondents said they supported vaccine passports to be implemented in a variety of scenarios, including travel, public events, malls, movie theatres, restaurants and at the workplace.

The most significant increases were in B.C., Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Atlantic Canada.

Angus Reid Institute

More support for regulation than incentives


Korzinski said he suspects the increase in support for proof of vaccination in Alberta is down to the fact that it's been hit hard by the fourth wave of COVID-19 cases and has lower levels of vaccination than some other parts of Canada.

As of Wednesday morning, Alberta's COVID-19 cases had climbed to 15,486 active cases with only 60 per cent of all Albertans (or 70.6 per cent of those eligible to get the vaccine) having received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine.

"The vast majority of those people who are vaccinated think you should have to prove it," he said. "So, they're looking at it as an extra measure of safety ... they've done their part, and they're trying to figure out how to get other people to kind of join them."

According to the survey, 77 per cent of responders across the country agreed that provincial governments should use regulatory measures, rather than incentives, to increase vaccination.

When asked how those who refuse to show vaccination proof at a restaurant and refuse to leave should be handled, 44 per cent of respondents agreed with the statement that the person should be escorted off property while 29 per cent agreed they should receive a fine.

For comparison purposes only, a probabilistic sample of the size of this survey would yield a margin of error of +/– eight percentage points.

Several provinces have opted for proof of vaccination


Several provinces have already introduced proof-of-vaccination measures, including Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia.

However, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has said that Alberta would not bring in vaccine passports in part because it would contravene the province's Health Information Act.

Instead, Kenney announced last Friday that the government would offer a $100 incentive to motivate those who are not fully vaccinated to get their jabs.

"I wish we didn't have to do this, but this is not a time for moral judgments. This is a time to get people vaccinated," Kenney said.
BLUE HYDROGEN & 'MAYBE' TECH
Japan's Mitsubishi partners with Shell Canada in clean energy push

Wed., September 8, 2021,

Pedestrians are reflected on a signboard of Mitsubishi Corp at its head office in Tokyo


(Reuters) - Japan's Mitsubishi Corp and Shell Canada have signed a memorandum of understanding to produce low-carbon hydrogen to support Japan's push for clean energy, the companies announced on Wednesday.

Mitsubishi plans to build and start up the low-carbon hydrogen facility near Shell's Scotford, Alberta, facility toward the latter half of this decade, the companies said in a statement
https://www.mitsubishicorp.com/jp/en/pr/archive/2021/html/0000047710.html.

The companies aim to produce about 165,000 tons per annum of hydrogen in the first phase of the project, which would be converted to low-carbon ammonia for export to Asian markets.

The low-carbon hydrogen, or blue hydrogen, would be produced via a natural gas feedstock and exported mainly to the Japanese market to produce clean energy, the companies said.


Shell would provide CO2 storage via its proposed Polaris carbon capture and storage project near Edmonton.

Shell in July unveiled its Polaris CCS project, joining a number of other companies proposing clean energy initiatives in Canada's main oil-producing province. The project would have the capacity to store 300 million tonnes of carbon over its lifetime.


Alberta, home to Canada's oil sands, is aiming to become a hub for carbon storage and hydrogen production as the world moves away from fossil fuel consumption and tries to cut climate-warming carbon emissions.

(Reporting by Rahul Paswan and Swati Verma in Bengaluru; Editing by Mark Porter)
BC 
Vessels return to Victoria after collecting 8 tonnes of trash from Great Pacific Garbage Patch
The Ocean Cleanup organization is based in Denmark but two of its vessels are docked at Ogden Point in Victoria. (Ocean Cleanup)

Eric Lloyd
CTV News Vancouver Island
Updated Sept. 9, 2021

VICTORIA -

A crew of sailors has returned to Victoria from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, hauling away more than eight tonnes of plastic pollution.

But their work is far from over.

“That’s not as much as we plan on bringing back in October,” said Ocean Cleanup spokesperson Joost Dubois.

Ocean Cleanup is a non-profit group established in 2014 with an ambitious goal of cleaning up the world’s ocean plastic.

“Out of the water, back on land and into recycling or waste management,” Dubois said.

The organization is based in the Netherlands but two of its vessels are docked at Ogden Point in Victoria. After a crew change and fresh supplies, they’ll venture back out to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

That’s where Ocean Cleanup spent its last six weeks, testing its trash collecting system.

“The first trip of the campaign was very much a testing and optimization period, where we were using ‘Jenny’ as we call our system fondly, for the first time,” said Dubois.

“Really we’re at the tipping point of testing to really cleaning up. Right now we’ve never had the system in the water long enough to fill the retention zone.”

“Jenny” is the crew’s nickname for the massive horseshoe-shaped device, pulled behind two offshore supply ships. It collects ocean plastics and traps them in a rectangular retention zone the size of a school bus.

“The plastic is guided in through these long wings,” said Dubois. “The full retention zone will be about 10 to 12 tonnes of plastic in one haul.”

On Saturday, Ocean Cleanup’s new crew will set sail and by the end of September, the hope is to fill “Jenny” to the brim for the very first time.

“We have our first five-day continuous test scheduled,” said Dubois,

“So the first time they lift that entire retention zone as full as a pregnant whale… lift that on deck and empty it, that’s going to be a big moment for us because that will feel like OK, now we have really started to clean up the ocean – we’re no longer just testing.”

The goal is to return to Victoria on Oct. 20 with upwards of 30 to 40 tonnes of plastic debris.

“Don’t hold us to it. We still have to deliver, but that is what we are internally looking at,” said Dubois.

Ocean Cleanup will continue testing and improving its systems with the hope of introducing a second “Jenny” to its fleet next year.

“That should become the blueprint for real scale-up and then we can make multiple systems in one go and then the speed of operation is going to go up tremendously,” said Dubois

“We will need like, 10 ‘Jennies’ to cover the entire Great Pacific Garbage Patch.”

Ocean Cleanup hopes to remove about 90 per cent of the world’s ocean plastics by 2040.


In this undated handout photo provided by The Ocean Clean Up, plastic is retained in front of an extended cork line in the Pacific Ocean. (The Ocean Cleanup via AP)
People's Party of Canada turfs riding president over Trudeau stone-throwing incident

Shane Marshall was the president of the Elgin Middlesex London riding association


Kate Dubinski · CBC News · Posted: Sep 09, 2021 
RCMP security detail put their hands up to protect Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau from rocks as protesters shout and threw gravel while leaving a campaign stop at a local micro brewery during the Canadian federal election campaign in London Ont., on Monday, September 6, 2021. (Nathan Denette/The Canadian Press)


The People's Party of Canada removed the Elgin Middlesex London riding association president from his post after allegations that he threw gravel at Liberal Party Leader Justin Trudeau during a campaign stop in London, Ont.

Party spokesperson, Martin Masse confirmed in an email to CBC News that Shane Marshall has been removed because of the allegations.

No one from the party was available for interviews about the matter, Masse said. Email and phone requests to the candidate in the riding, Chelsea Hillier, were not returned.



Trudeau, security detail hit by gravel stones
3 days ago
A protester threw what appeared to be a handful of gravel stones at Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau outside a campaign stop in London, Ont., on Monday, striking him and members of his security detail. 0:08

VIDEO Trudeau hit by gravel as protesters surround campaign bus in London, Ont.

Marshall is known in anti-lockdown and white-supremacist circles, said Peter Smith, an investigative journalist with the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, an independent non-profit which researches hate groups and hate crimes.

"His online content mainly focuses on his political beliefs, which are fairly hard-line. This isn't someone who is just vaccine-hesitant or right-leaning," Smith said. "This is a person who expresses, through memes and videos as well as his appearances at multiple protests dressed in a balaclava waving a flag from Canada's colonial past, an explicitly white nationalist view."

London police have said they are investigating the stone-throwing incident.

CBC News has tried to reach out to Marshall for comment and will continue to do so.

 

Alberta's rising COVID-19 cases due to faulty modelling and government inaction, experts say

'People are going to die and it is really tragic — but it is also infuriating'

Dr. Deena Hinshaw, Alberta's chief medical officer of health, is seen leaving the podium after a June 29 news conference. Hinshaw's next media availability, almost one month later, was the announcement that testing, contract tracing and mandatory isolation would be scaled back. (Chris Schwarz/Government of Alberta)

Alberta's plan to lift all pandemic restrictions and precautions appears to have been based on a scenario rooted more in wishful optimism and political expediency than obvious scientific evidence, say experts in infectious diseases and pandemic modelling.

But they say the problem was compounded as Premier Jason Kenney and Dr. Deena Hinshaw, the chief medical officer of health, failed to reimpose measures despite the steady rise of COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations through the summer.

"At this point in the pandemic, there is no excuse for this sort of negligence at the government level," said Dr. Ilan Schwartz, an associate professor of infectious diseases at the University of Alberta.

"The bottom line is that people are going to die and it is really tragic — but it is also infuriating, because this was all entirely preventable."

In late May, Kenney promised the "best summer ever" for Albertans as he announced the government's three-part plan to be the first and most open province in Canada, with no restrictions by July 1. 

Then in late July, Hinshaw announced the province would end testing, contact tracing and mandatory isolation, a move that alarmed doctors and infectious disease experts across the country. 

Based on U.K. data

According to Kenney and Hinshaw, the moves were based on data from the United Kingdom showing that high vaccination rates had "decoupled" infections from severe outcomes, which in turn had resulted in much lower rates of hospitalization. 

But both Schwartz and Dean Karlen, a physics professor and expert in modelling at the University of Victoria, said Alberta's reliance on the U.K. experience made little sense.

"You don't just use one jurisdiction to base your best knowledge [on]. Especially you don't choose the one that has the most optimistic future," said Karlen, a member of British Columbia's independent COVID-19 Modelling Group, which has been publicly releasing modelling information about Alberta. 

"You really should be looking at multiple jurisdictions." 

You really should be looking at multiple jurisdictions.- Dean Karlen, University of Victoria modelling expert

Karlen said it was evident the U.K. was an outlier, because major outbreaks in Europe and the U.S. were being followed by predictable increases in hospitalizations.

"The preponderance of data was not supporting any kind of decoupling like that," Karlen said.

Hinshaw and Health Minister Tyler Shandro declined requests to be interviewed for this story. 

Perplexing failure to act

Karlen said Alberta's assumptions were based on the decline of the alpha variant of COVID-19, despite evidence that the more contagious delta variant was surging and would become dominant.

He also said the U.K. had a higher, more uniform rate of vaccination. Alberta, in contrast, had several pockets with very low vaccination rates.

Dr. Ilan Schwartz, assistant professor of infectious diseases at the University of Alberta, said the government missed the signals to act. (CBC)

Because most of the new infections in Alberta would be among the unvaccinated — and because delta's effect on health is more severe — there was no reason to assume these people wouldn't be hospitalized, Karlen said.

Alberta's COVID-19 statistics bear that reasoning out.

As of July 1, there were 1,055 active COVID-19 cases, 165 people in hospital, a test positivity rate of 1.17 per cent and 2,301 total deaths.

On Aug. 1, just days after Hinshaw had announced plans to scale back testing, tracing and isolation, there were 1,655 active cases, 90 people in hospital and a positivity rate of 2.39 per cent

On Sept. 1, the numbers showed how the virus was spreading: 12,290 active cases, 465 people in hospital, a positivity rate of 10.8 per cent and 2,383 deaths.

Throughout the pandemic, the Kenney government consistently sought to limit what it viewed as unnecessary restrictions on the public and on businesses. 

But the delta variant, Schwartz said, "doesn't obey political wishes, which is essentially what this was."

Return to restrictions

On Sept. 3, with more than 1,000 new infections a day and the province's intensive care units at 95 per cent occupancy, Kenney, Shandro and Hinshaw announced the reimposition of restrictions, such as mandatory masking in all indoor spaces, and introduced a $100 gift card as an incentive for people to get vaccinated. 

The government has also stated that mandatory, versus recommended, isolation measures will continue for people who have tested positive.

Schwartz said the Alberta government should have been more responsive to the situation and acted sooner.

"I think that it is possible that [Hinshaw] made a really bad mistake, clearly under political pressure, in late July when pushing for the ending of testing, tracing and isolation," Schwartz said.

"But really, the critical failure was not changing course and not instituting public health interventions much earlier."

Big oil’s ‘wokewashing’ is the new climate science denialism

Academic researchers say the fossil fuel industry has a new tool to delay efforts to curb emissions – a social justice strategy


‘Discourses of delay’ by the fossil fuel companies. Left: Chevron; middle: BP and Shell; right: ExxonMobil. Photograph: Twitter


Supported by


Amy Westervelt
@amywestervelt
Thu 9 Sep 2021 11.00 BST

ExxonMobil has been touting its commitment to “reducing carbon emissions with innovative energy solutions”. Chevron would like to remind you it is keeping the lights on during this dark time. BP is going #NetZero, but is also very proud of the “digital innovations” on its new, enormous oil drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico. Meanwhile Shell insists it really supports women in traditionally male-dominated jobs.

A casual social media user might get the impression the fossil fuel industry views itself as a social justice warrior, fighting on behalf of the poor, the marginalized, and women – at least based on its marketing material in recent years.

These campaigns fall into what a handful of sociologists and economists call “discourses of delay”. While oil and gas companies have a long track record of denying climate change, even after their own scientists repeatedly warned of the harm caused by burning fossil fuels, now the industry’s messaging is far more subtle and in many ways more effective than outright climate science denial.

By downplaying the urgency of the climate crisis, the industry has new tools to delay efforts to curb fossil fuel emissions. And worse yet: even industry critics haven’t fully caught up to this new approach.

“If you just focus on climate denial, then all of this other stuff is missed,” explains Robert Brulle, an environmental sociologist and visiting professor at Brown University.

Brulle, who published a peer-reviewed study in 2019 that analyzed major oil corporations’ advertising spending over a 30-year period, says the “lion’s share” of ad dollars were directed not toward denial, or even toward the industry’s products, but toward pro-fossil fuel propaganda – campaigns that remind people over and over again about all the great things oil companies do, how dependent we are on fossil fuels, and how integral the industry is to society.

“They’re spending probably five or 10 times more on all this corporate promotion advertising,” he says. “And yet the climate movement seems to only focus on the science denial part.”ExxonMobil has used Twitter campaigns to emphasize progress on addressing climate change while also downplaying the urgency of the crisis. Source: Twitter

Oil companies stopped pushing overt climate denial more than a decade ago. And while conspiracy theories claiming climate change is a hoax may surface occasionally, they are no longer an effective strategy.

Instead, the fossil fuel industry, utilities and the various trade groups, politicians and think tanks that carry water for both, have pivoted to messages that acknowledge the problem, but downplay its severity and the urgency for solutions. Instead companies are overstating the industry’s progress toward addressing climate change.

In a paper published in the journal Global Sustainability last July, economist William Lamb and nearly a dozen co-authors catalogued the most common messaging from those who would prefer to see inaction on climate for as long as possible. According to Lamb’s team, the industry’s “discourses of delay” fall into four buckets: redirect responsibility (consumers are also to blame for fossil fuel emissions), push non-transformative solutions (disruptive change is not necessary), emphasize the downside of action (change will be disruptive), and surrender (it’s not possible to mitigate climate change).

“This was a paper that was born on Twitter, funnily enough,” Lamb says. Lamb and collaborators Giulio Mattoli and Julia Steinberger began compiling the fossil fuel messaging they saw repeatedly on social media. Then they asked other academics from various fields to add what they were seeing too, and patterns soon emerged.

Lamb says they explicitly left denial out of the equation. “What we tried to do was really examine delay as something distinct,” he says. “From our view, delay had not received the kind of attention it deserves.”

Of all the messaging geared toward delaying action on climate, or assurances that the fossil fuel industry has a grip on possible solutions, Lamb and other authors agreed that one theme was far more prevalent than the rest: “the social justice argument.”

This strategy generally takes one of two forms: either warnings that a transition away from fossil fuels will adversely impact poor and marginalized communities, or claims that oil and gas companies are aligned with those communities. Researchers call this practice “wokewashing”.
Twitter ads, like this video by ExxonMobil, reflect popular messaging around social justice, implying that the company is aligned with diverse communities. Researchers call this practice ‘wokewashing’.
Composite: Twitter

An email Chevron’s PR firm CRC Advisors sent to journalists last year is a perfect example. It urged journalists to look at how green groups were “claiming solidarity” with Black Lives Matter while “backing policies which would hurt minority communities”. Chevron later denied that it had anything to do with this email, although it regularly hires CRC and the bottom of the email in question read: “If you would rather not receive future communications from Chevron, let us know by clicking here.”

Another common industry talking point argues a transition away from fossil fuels will be unavoidably bad for impoverished communities. The argument is based on the assumption that these communities value fossil fuel energy more than concerns about all of its attendant problems (air and water pollution, in addition to climate change), and that there is no way to provide poor communities or countries with affordable renewable energy.

Chevron also claimed solidarity with Black Lives Matter last year, although it is also responsible for polluting the Black-majority city it’s headquartered in: Richmond, California, where Chevron also pays for a larger-than-average police force. Meanwhile the American Petroleum Institute, Big Oil’s largest trade group and lobbyist, funds diversity in stem programs, but it also declines to acknowledge the disproportionate impacts on communities of color.

Discourses of delay don’t just show up in advertising and marketing campaigns, but in policy conversations too.

“We’ve gone through thousands of pieces of testimony on climate and clean energy bills at the state level, and all of the industry arguments against this sort of legislation included these messages,” says J Timmons Roberts, professor of environment and sociology at Brown University, and a co-author on the “discourses of delay” paper.
People need a sort of field guide to these arguments so they’re not just duped.

In a recently published study focused on delay tactics in Massachusetts, for example, Roberts and his co-authors catalogued how fossil fuel interest groups and utility companies in particular used discourses of delay to try to defeat clean energy legislation. Another recent study found similar campaigns against clean energy and climate bills in Connecticut. “The social justice argument is the one we’re seeing used the most,” he says.

Lamb sees the same thing happening in Europe. “Often you do see those arguments come from right of center politicians, which suggests hypocrisy in a way because they’re not so interested in the social dimension on parallel issues of social justice like education policy or financial policy.”

While the social justice argument stands out as a favorite at the moment, Lamb says the others are in regular rotation too, from focusing on what individual consumers should be doing to reduce their own carbon footprints to promoting the ideas that technology will save us and that fossil fuels are a necessary part of the solution.

“These things are effective, they work,” Roberts says. “So what we need is inoculation – people need a sort of field guide to these arguments so they’re not just duped.”

This story is published as part of Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of news outlets strengthening coverage of the climate story.
REFUSE TO GIVE UP THE GOVT TEAT
Biden admin ousts Trump appointees from military academy advisory boards

Kellyanne Conway, the former White House counselor to then-President Donald Trump, told the Biden administration on Wednesday that she would not resign from her position on the Board of Visitors to the U.S. Air Force Academy after she was among the 18 Trump appointees asked to step down.
File Pool Photo by Chip Somodevilla/UPI | License Photo

Sept. 8 (UPI) -- The Biden administration on Wednesday removed multiple appointees to military advisory boards by former President Donald Trump.

A total of 18 Trump appointees were ask to resign with Chris Meagher, a White House spokesman confirming in a statement to The New York Times that all had "either resigned or has been terminated from their position."


Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, earlier Wednesday confirmed to reporters during a press briefing that Catherine Russell, director of White House Office of Presidential Personnel, had sent letters to Trump allies on various military advisory boards, including those for West Point, the U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force, seeking their resignation.

"Yes, we have," she said.

President Joe Biden's objective, she said, is to ensure those serving on these boards "are qualified" and "are aligned with [Biden's] values."

"So, yes, that was an ask that was made," she said.




Kellyanne Conway, former Trump adviser; Sean Spicer, former White House press secretary during the Trump administration; and Russ Vought, Trump's White House budget director, were among those to confirm they received letters requesting their resignation prior to 6 p.m. Wednesday when their positions on their various boards would be terminated.

Conway, who was a member of the Board of Visitors to the U.S. Air Force Academy, called the decision "petty and political, if not personal."

"I'm not resigning, but you should," she wrote to Biden in a letter posted to Twitter.

Spicer, a member of the Board of Visitors to the U.S. Naval Academy, told right-leaning news organization Newsmax for which he works, that he will not resign and will file a lawsuit against the administration.

"At a time when the administration is dealing with, you know, COVID, Afghanistan, the effects of Hurricane Ida, what are their priorities? Apparently ... firing veterans from service academies," he said.

Military advisory boards provide the academies with advice with the U.S. Naval Academy saying the duty of the members, who serve a three-year term, is to "inquire into the state of morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, academic methods and other matters relating to the academy, which the board decides to consider."

Psaki rejected the notion that the Biden administration was politicizing the rather largely ceremonial positions by suggesting those asked to step down were not qualified to serve on the boards.

"The president's qualification requirements are not your party registration; they are whether you're qualified to serve and whether you're aligned with the values of this administration," she said.

The move comes after the Trump administration before leaving office appointed dozens of allies and former advisors to government boards, Politico reported.

Since taking office, the Biden administration has sought to undo that and in February, the Department in Defense launched a review of all of the Pentagon's advisory boards, which would make recommendations for each one concerning retention, realignment and termination by June 1.

Last week, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III approved for 16 of those advisory committees to resume operations.

Meaghan Mobbs, a military veteran, said all Trump-appointees to the West Point Board of Visitors Advisory Board including herself were asked to step down, and accused the board of being "hijacked by partisan action."

Johnathan Hiler, who was former Vice President Mike Pence's director of legislative affairs, tweeted he was among those who would not resign.

"As an alum and former naval officer, I believe developing leaders capable of defending our country's interests at sea -- U.S.N.A's mission -- is not something that should be consumed by partisan politics," he tweeted. "Apparently, President Biden feels differently."

Thousands suffer health effects of Ground Zero's toxic dust 20 years after 9/11 attacks


A volunteer worker wipes dust from his face as he carries an oxygen tank for firefighters after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. File Photo by Monika Graff/UPI | License Photo

NEW YORK, Sept. 9 (UPI) -- A new World Trade Center stands in lower Manhattan 20 years after Sept. 11, 2001, but thousands of people who were there that day -- from first responders hoping to save lives to people who were just on their daily commute -- continue to feel health effects linked to the terrorist attack.

More than 80,000 first responders are enrolled in the World Trade Center Health Program, a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health initiative created under the Zadroga 9/11 Health Act of 2010, which provides care at no cost to those with health conditions related to the attacks.


In addition, it oversees the care of more than 30,000 civilians who survived the events of that day, including those who lived and worked in the neighborhood and students at schools nearby.

Both numbers have increased over the past decade, with the number of first-responder enrollees rising by about 40% since 2011 and the population of survivors under care growing three-fold since 2016. Many have cancer.



These trends are likely to continue, as new cancer cases among survivors of the attacks are expected to emerge due to disease "latency," according to environmental and occupational medicine specialist Dr. Iris G. Udasin.

Solid tumor cancers related to toxic exposures take at least four years to develop, with most remaining latent for 15 to 20 years, Udasin said.

"Because of cancer latency and other health problems, such as diabetes and heart disease, developing with age, we're seeing survivors who had been healthy for years only now entering the program," Udasin, director of the WTC Center of Excellence at Rutgers University, told UPI in a phone interview.

As part of a WTC Center of Excellence, a designation awarded to several hospitals in the New York area, Udasin and her colleagues care for nearly 5,000 survivors.

"Only now are they getting sick," she said.

Although the number of first responders and survivors in the WTC Health Program continues to rise, its "outreach" efforts for the latter group have not been as effective, Udasin said.

More than 10% of patients treated at Rutgers said they lacked access to at least one needed healthcare service under the WTC program, Udasin and her colleagues found in a study published earlier this year.




More than cancer


Cancer may be the health problem most commonly associated with the attacks, given the dust and debris that rained down on lower Manhattan and the cloud that hung over the area for weeks afterward.


However, first responders and survivors suffer from myriad issues, many of which continue to affect their quality of life 20 years later, said Mark Farfel, director of the New York City Department of Health's WTC Health Registry.

The registry includes data on roughly 71,000 first responders and survivors, but estimates that as many as 400,000 people were exposed to toxic dust particles generated by the attacks in the five boroughs alone.

"The 9/11 disaster has had a long-lasting effect on the physical and mental health of thousands of survivors," Farfel told UPI in a phone interview.

In an analysis he and his colleagues published in 2019, among those in the registry, 15% reported asthma diagnosed after 9/11, while 22% had gastroesophageal reflux disease, or acid reflux, 14% had post-traumatic stress disorder and 15% reported depression.

Nearly half of those who reported these conditions suffered from more than one of them, and many indicated that their quality of life has been affected as a result, the data showed.



Hearing loss also is common among survivors, Farfel said.


Lila Newman, who was a senior at Stuyvesant High School, just north of the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks, has had chronic asthma and acid reflux, as well as rhinosinusitis -- sinus inflammation -- and PTSD in the years since.

These, along with various cancers, are among the most common conditions experienced by WTC Health Program enrollees, according to its data, which is available online.

Newman now works with others who were students at Stuyvesant on Sept. 11 to help connect them with healthcare.

"The World Trade Center Health Program has helped so many people, but many others find that they can't access its benefits because they suffer from conditions not covered under the program," she told UPI.

This includes autoimmune disorders that have been linked with PTSD, particularly in women, said Newman, who has written a book about their experiences called Some Kids Left Behind.

Many of her schoolmates continue to experience problems ranging from migraines to blood and thyroid cancers, Newman said.

"There are hundreds, if not thousands, of people -- survivors -- who are essentially left on their own," she said.

Helaina Hovitz Regal, who was in middle school in lower Manhattan 20 years ago and lived in the neighborhood, has had PTSD and still suffers from chronic migraine headaches.

"When we think about 9/11 survivors, we often think of those who are suffering from physical health issues, but alongside them are people who are also living with incredibly painful mental health issues," Hovitz Regal told UPI by email.

"Mental health and physical health are very strongly connected, and what can occur alongside the stress and anxiety of living with PTSD are physical issues ... that can have a serious impact on their quality of life," she said.

Hovitz Regal, who wrote a memoir called After 9/11: One Girl's Journey Through Darkness to a New Beginning, also works as an advocate for people struggling with their mental health after surviving the attacks. She does not, however, compare her health problems to those suffering from a life-threatening illnesses.

However, "we are all dealing with [the] aftermath [and] we are all worthy of recovery," she said.



Ongoing health challenges
Like Hovitz Regal, most of those enrolled in the WTC Health Program live in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, though all 50 states and Washington, D.C., are represented.

About 2% of the first responders covered under the WTC Health Program worked at the Pentagon and in Shanksville, Pa., where other planes hijacked by the terrorists were crashed, killing all onboard.

However, data is not available on how many of the survivors receiving treatment under the program were at these locations at the time of the attacks.

The program covers various cancers and airway and respiratory diseases linked with exposure to toxins at the site, as well as mental health problems and, for first responders, musculoskeletal problems such as low back pain.

As of June 30, survivors age 35 and younger account for 1% of the program enrollees, while those age 35 to 44 make up 2%.

More than half of the enrollees are current or former first responders age 45 to 64, meaning they were 25 to 44 years old at the time of the attacks.

Nearly one-third of the survivors enrolled in the program have digestive disorders related to the attacks, while one-fourth of them have been diagnosed with linked cancers.

Up to 30% of the program enrollees suffer from multiple health conditions related to the attacks. The most common forms of cancer among the survivors include prostate, breast, skin, thyroid and lung, based on program data.

Combined, more than 3,000 of the first responders and survivors with these cancers and lung and digestive diseases enrolled in the program have died.

"The health effects of the 9/11 attacks are still very real for many, many people," Farfel, of New York City's WTC Health Registry, said.

"And, as the years pass, these health effects continue to have a great impact on their lives and their healthcare needs," he said.

20 years of mourning: 9/11 terrorist attacks on America


Jeanie Quest (L) and Phillip Jabour react to photographs of the terrorist attack on New York City and Washington, D.C., on September 11, 2001, in a special edition of the Dallas Morning News. Photo by Ian Halperin/UPI | License Photo





































Iran: The girls choosing education over tradition

Listen to audio 18:11
  • Date 08.09.2021

  • Author Dominika Nooripur