Sunday, March 09, 2025

 Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. Photo Credit: Mehr News Agency

The Deepening Deterioration Of The Situation In Afghanistan – Analysis


By 

By Zhou Chao


Since the United States’ hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban quickly overthrew the pro-Western government that had been supported by the U.S. and other Western nations, establishing their own regime. Subsequently, the international community maintained a long-standing stance of non-recognition and isolation towards the Taliban authorities, and the Chinese government also did not officially recognize the Taliban. However, the Chinese government and the Taliban authorities have had considerable practical contact, with China formally accepting the Taliban’s appointed ambassador to China, and Chinese companies beginning to reinvest in the Afghan region.

In 2023, China’s Central Asia Petroleum and Natural Gas Company (CAPEIC) signed an investment agreement with the Afghan authorities totaling USD 540 million. In 2024, China and Afghanistan signed a cooperation agreement for a key supporting project of the Mes Aynak copper mining, the Baghdara hydropower project, with a total investment of USD 10 billion. In the summer of the same year, there was an official announcement on the commencement of the construction of a new road from the Kabul-Gardez intercity highway to the entrance of the Mes Aynak copper mine, marking a significant step forward in the China-invested mine project.

Since the Taliban took control of the Afghan government, analyses have consistently pointed out that the internal situation in Afghanistan has not fully stabilized. Internal conflicts in Afghanistan still show signs of resurgence, and the Taliban remains isolated internationally, with economic difficulties also intensifying. However, some Chinese analyses suggest that this situation might actually present an opportunity for China to increase its investment in Afghanistan.

Recently, Transparency International, in its 2024 report, stated that Afghanistan ranked 165th out of 180 countries in terms of public sector corruption. According to the report, Afghanistan scored 17 out of 100 on the Corruption Perceptions Index, 3 points lower than its score in 2023. The country had previously scored 20 points in 2023 and 24 points in 2022. Although the Taliban regime’s scores have decreased in recent years, it still remains better than the situation under the previous government. In March 2024, the Taliban authority publicly stated that all forms of corruption within government departments had been eradicated and that Afghanistan would welcome foreign investment with efficiency, integrity, and a proactive attitude. Overall, the feasibility of investing in Afghanistan seems to have been strengthened. However, a series of developments in Afghanistan’s internal situation since the second half of last year suggest that the possibility of the situation worsening significantly should not be underestimated.

For the Taliban regime, its governance is based on Islamic law, with Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada controlling core policies through religious edicts. Military and political leaders are required to obey his decisions. Beneath the Supreme Leader, the Taliban regime is primarily divided into four factions:


1. Kandahar Faction (Akhundzada, etc.): Representing the traditional Pashtun forces, this faction emphasizes religious orthodoxy.

2. Haqqani Network: An independent military-economic group closely linked to cross-border armed organizations.

3. Doha Faction (led by Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, among others): Advocates for limited openness to gain international recognition, but its influence has significantly weakened in recent years.

4. Local Warlords: Some local commanders have gained more autonomy in areas such as taxation and security, creating centrifugal tendencies against the central Taliban government.

Outside the Taliban regime, there are still opposition forces in Afghanistan. The more active ones include ISIS, former Afghan government officials, and opposition armed groups led by former Northern Alliance commanders.

Since last year, in terms of Afghanistan’s internal political and security situation, the Taliban authorities have primarily faced two major challenges.

Firstly, there is a growing trend of internal power struggles within the regime. Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid recently stated on social media that there are indeed differences of opinion within the Taliban, but he insisted that these differences would not escalate into violent conflict or open clashes. However, observers have pointed out that serious divisions have already emerged within the Taliban leadership and are continuing to intensify.

Several months ago, the Taliban’s Interior Minister, Sirajuddin Haqqani, disappeared after traveling to the UAE, while the Deputy Foreign Minister, Abbas Stanikzai, fled to the UAE after issuing harsh criticisms of the Taliban’s senior leadership.

Related analyses suggest that Afghanistan’s supreme spiritual leader Akhundzada, is continuously consolidating power, strengthening the Kandahar faction’s control over Afghanistan’s highest authority. Meanwhile, the senior leadership of the Haqqani Network is being increasingly marginalized, leading to intense struggles between the two factions. The internal conflict within the Taliban seems to be intensifying, which could directly exacerbate instability in Afghanistan. A recent commentary in Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper even pointed out that there is a risk of the Taliban’s highest leader being overthrown.

Secondly, the strength and destructive power of opposition forces have increased. The Taliban has made slow progress in establishing an inclusive government and has shown excessive bias toward the Pashtun, which has caused strong dissatisfaction among other ethnic groups in the country. Opposition armed groups have seized this opportunity to gain widespread support from Tajik, Hazara, and other ethnic communities, frequently operating in the northern and central regions of Afghanistan. Among them, the organizations led by Ahmad Massoud, leader of the National Resistance Front (NRF), and Yasin Zia, leader of the Afghanistan Freedom Front (AFF), have been the most active.

Previously, the AFF has even launched attacks in Kabul, causing casualties among several Taliban members, demonstrating its strong combat capabilities and a determined spirit of resistance. Meanwhile, the NRF has been steadily expanding its forces in its operational areas, strengthening military training, and enhancing its stance against the Taliban. The resurgence of opposition forces, coupled with the intensification of internal struggles within the Taliban, is likely to accelerate the deterioration of Afghanistan’s internal situation.

Moreover, negative factors outside the political and security situation are also quite evident.

According to a report from the World Bank, Afghanistan’s GDP has declined by 26% over the past two years, with the economy continuing to suffer from a recession, high unemployment, and a large portion of the population losing their sources of income, resulting in a dire living situation. In such an economic environment, sectors like infrastructure development, education, and healthcare in Afghanistan have struggled to develop effectively, leading to a worsening quality of life for the people.

In terms of international recognition, despite the Taliban authorities actively engaging in diplomatic activities, expanding foreign relations, and increasing interactions with Russia, Turkey, China, and some Gulf countries, they recently held high-level meetings with India and even sent delegations to Japan, the international community’s recognition of the Taliban government remains minimal. The Taliban authorities are finding it difficult to secure the necessary aid to improve the internal situation, and a significant portion of the population, in search of a livelihood, either flee abroad or align with armed groups, ultimately creating a vicious cycle.

Furthermore, the worsening relationship between Afghanistan and Pakistan is also worth noting. Data released by the United Nations shows that the operational capabilities of Pakistan’s largest terrorist group, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), have significantly increased, severely worsening Pakistan’s security situation. The report indicates that between July and December 2024, the TTP launched over 600 terrorist attacks against Pakistan, including attacks originating from Afghan territory.

Despite the Taliban’s assurances that Afghan territory will not be used for terrorism against any country, the Afghan Taliban continues to provide logistical support, operational space, and financial backing to the TTP, including funding for TTP leadership and establishing new training centers in Afghanistan’s Kunar, Nangarhar, Khost, and Paktika provinces. Afghanistan’s support for the TTP severely impacts Pakistan’s security, further escalating tensions between the two countries. Recently, Pakistani authorities have made it clear that they do not rule out the possibility of fully deporting the millions of Afghan refugees still residing in Pakistan. Should Pakistan take formal action, the influx of millions of refugees would further strain Afghanistan’s social resources and exacerbate the country’s already volatile situation.

Another important point to consider is that, with the deepening deterioration of the situation in Afghanistan, it is certain to create a regional spillover effect. Refugees and armed militants are likely to spread to neighboring countries, which would, in turn, have a negative impact on the entire Central Asian region.

Final analysis conclusion:

Since the Taliban’s return to power, the international community generally acknowledges that violence within Afghanistan has decreased. However, existing analyses also point out that the Taliban regime has failed to effectively integrate internal forces, and its relationship with its most important neighbor, Pakistan, continues to deteriorate. Now, with the intensifying infighting within the Taliban leadership, the possibility of a deepening internal crisis in Afghanistan cannot be overlooked. If this trend continues to escalate, the regional spillover effects could be quite significant.

  • Zhou Chao is a Research Fellow for Geopolitical Strategy programme at ANBOUND, an independent think tank.
Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. Photo Credit: Mehr News Agency

Anbound Consulting (Anbound) is an independent Think Tank with the headquarter based in Beijing. Established in 1993, Anbound specializes in public policy research, and enjoys a professional reputation in the areas of strategic forecasting, policy solutions and risk analysis. Anbound's research findings are widely recognized and create a deep interest within public media, academics and experts who are also providing consulting service to the State Council of China.

 Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Tower Water Vapor Clouds

Qatar Demands IAEA Oversight Of Israel’s Nuclear Facilities


WOULD THAT INCLUDE ITS NUKE WEAPONS 

By 

Qatar on Saturday called for international efforts to bring all Israel’s nuclear facilities under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency.


The foreign ministry of Qatar, in a statement, called on Israel “to subject all its nuclear facilities to IAEA safeguards” and for Israel to join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. 

The statement followed a meeting of IAEA governors in Vienna attended by Jassim Yacoub Al-Hammadi, Qatar’s ambassador and permanent representative to the United Nations in Vienna. The meeting addressed “the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories and Israel’s nuclear capabilities.”

Al-Hammadi noted during the meeting that “some of these resolutions explicitly urged Israel to join the NPT as a non-nuclear state.”

He also pointed out that “all Middle Eastern countries, except Israel, are parties to the NPT and have effective safeguard agreements with the agency.”

He further noted that Israel continues its aggressive policies, such as calls for a forced displacement of the Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, and its intensifying military operations in the West Bank, as well as the “obstruction of humanitarian aid to Gaza and continued restrictions on UNRWA’s operations.”


Qatar is a mediator for Gaza ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas.

 Philippines ‘Prepared’ For ICC Arrest Order Against Ex-Leader Duterte: Officials


Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. Photo Credit: Presidential Communications Operations Office


By 

By Jason Gutierrez


The Philippines is ready to assist Interpol should the International Criminal Court order former President Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest over his past government’s bloody crackdown on illegal drugs, Marcos administration officials said.  

Unconfirmed reports were circulating during the weekend saying The Hague-based ICC was expected to issue an arrest order soon for the ex-Philippine leader in connection with its investigation into Duterte.

“We’ve heard that an arrest warrant has been issued by the International Criminal Court against former President Rodrigo Duterte for crimes against humanity,” Presidential Communications Office Secretary Jay Ruiz said in a brief statement issued Sunday. 

“The government is prepared for any eventuality.”

Press Undersecretary Claire Castro later clarified that there was “no confirmation” yet on the ICC arrest warrant, but said that “if Interpol will ask for the necessary assistance from the government, it will provide [assistance].”


The 79-year-old Duterte is being investigated by the ICC Office of the Prosecutor over alleged crimes against humanity that were committed when police in the Philippines killed thousands of suspected drug addicts and dealers during his time in office (2016-22). 

The investigation also covers a period when he previously served as mayor of Davao, where the tough-talking and notoriously foul-mouthed Duterte built a reputation for coming down hard on illegal drugs in that southern Philippine city.   

In response to an email query from BenarNews on Sunday about unconfirmed reports that an ICC arrest order for Duterte was imminent, the ICC’s prosecutor’s office issued a statement saying it “does not comment on ongoing investigations and has no comment on these reports.”

“The Office has an ongoing investigation in relation to the situation in the Philippines. This investigation focuses on crimes allegedly committed on the territory of the Philippines between 1 November 2011 and 16 March 2019 in the context of the so-called ‘War on Drugs’ campaign,” the office’s Public Information Unit went on to say.

“Confidentiality is a crucial part of our work and is essential to protect the integrity of investigations and to ensure the safety and security of victims, witnesses, and all those with whom the Office interacts.”

Meanwhile, efforts by BenarNews to contact Duterte, and his spokesman or lawyer were unsuccessful over the weekend.

During the weekend, the former president was visiting Hong Kong, where he addressed an event attended by a large crowd of Filipino expatriate workers and his supporters, according to news reports. 

During his speech in Hong Kong on Sunday, he touched on reports about the ICC arrest warrant.

“I have so many cases piling up,” the Daily Tribune, a Philippine newspaper, quoted Duterte as saying.   

“Honestly, from what I hear, there’s a warrant for me at the ICC or something. They’ve been after me for a long time, those [expletive].”

The ex-leader has never denied his heavy-handed approach to combatting the narcotics trade, insisting it was necessary to rid the Southeast Asian country of criminality.

“I can make the confession now if you want. I’m really doing it, but don’t involve the police,” Duterte told a congressional hearing last November. “I have a death squad, seven men, but they’re not police. They’re gangsters.”

At least 6,200 suspects were killed during the Duterte administration’s anti-narcotics campaign, according to the government’s latest figures. However, human rights groups have put the number as high as 20,000-plus.

Meanwhile, the Marcos administration’s position on the ICC investigation into Duterte’s drug war has changed significantly. 

It had initially resisted ICC efforts to investigate and prosecute Duterte, but lately the administration has softened its stance. In July 2024, it indicated that it would not block ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan from interviewing people who were allegedly involved in Duterte’s drug war.  

Ferdinand Marcos Jr. was elected president in May 2022, in a landslide win where Sara Duterte, Rodrigo Duterte’s daughter, was his running mate. 

But the alliance between the Marcoses and Dutertes – two of the most powerful families in Philippine politics – has since crumbled over an open public feud between President Marcos and Vice-President Duterte.

  • Imran Vittachi contributed to this report from Washington.

 

Authorities Reject Georgescu’s Presidential Candidacy Sparking Violence In Bucharest

Romania's Calin Georgescu. Photo Credit: Calin Georgescu, X


By 

(RFE/RL) — Romania’s Central Electoral Board (CEB) rejected the candidacy of far-right politician Calin Georgescu from a rerun of a presidential election, sparking clashes between his supporters, angry at the move, and police.


The CEB said on March 9 that it disqualified Georgescu’s application based on the Constitutional Court ruling that halted the original election in November following his first-round win.

“His candidacy does not meet the conditions provided by law, as established by the Constitutional Court in December 2024,” the CEB said.

“Consequently, at the resumption of the electoral process, the members of the BEC consider that it is inadmissible to consider that the same person meets the conditions to accede to the Presidency of Romania.”

Georgescu, who is critical of NATO and opposes Romanian support for Ukraine against Russia’s invasion, filed his candidacy for the rerun, to be held on May 4, on March 7.

The CEB had 48 hours to accept or reject the application. Georgescu has 24 hours to appeal the CEB move, which prompted hundreds of his supporters who clashed with security forces in front of the Board’s headquarters in central Bucharest.


Pro-Georgescu demonstrators set fire to street furniture and heavy objects at police, who responded with tear gas, law enforcement officials said.

Georgescu and his supporters have claimed Romanian authorities are trying to block his candidacy in the rerun. He reacted angrily to the rejection, calling it “a direct blow to the heart of democracy.”

“I have one message left! If democracy in Romania falls, the entire democratic world will fall! This is just the beginning. It’s that simple!…Europe is now a dictatorship, Romania is under tyranny!” he added in a social media post.

The first round of the presidential election was canceled by the Constitutional Court on December 6 after Romanian intelligence reports said foreign actors had manipulated social-media platforms, especially TikTok, to benefit Georgescu, a far-right, pro-Russian candidate.

The annulment of the vote has exacerbated deep divisions in Romanian politics and sparked international concern over the course of democracy in the European Union and NATO member.

Last month, US Vice-President JD Vance made thinly veiled criticism of the country’s moves against Georgescu, telling delegates at the Munich Security Conference that “if your democracy can be destroyed with a few hundred thousand dollars of digital advertising from a foreign country then it wasn’t very strong to begin with.”

Georgescu was a little-known figure in Romania until he unexpectedly won the first round of the presidential election on November 24 with about 22 percent of the vote.

The 62-year-old was to face pro-European centrist candidate Elena Lasconi in a runoff, which had been seen as a referendum on the future course of Romania.

Romanian Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu, who supported the Constitutional Court’s decision to annul the election, said the authorities have the right to present the public with extremely solid evidence in the investigation, “which involves a potential candidate in the May elections.”

Romanian President Klaus Iohannis on February 10 said he was resigning from his post amid an effort by the opposition to have him impeached after he stayed in power following the Constitutional Court’s election annulment.

Just days before the vote, Georgescu launched a TikTok campaign calling for an end to aid for Ukraine, apparently striking a chord with voters. He has also sounded a skeptical note on Romania’s NATO membership.

His anti-Western messaging is routinely amplified on Russian, state-run media and Kremlin-friendly social media.

His other stances included supporting Romanian farmers, reducing dependency on imports, and ramping up energy and food production.