Monday, March 10, 2025

Brewery is selling a 'Presidential Pack' to supply Canadians with enough beer to last Trump's entire term




Lauren Edmonds
Sat, March 8, 2025


A Canadian brewery is selling the "Presidential Pack," or 1,461 cans of its Canadian Lager.

It's intended to last the course of President Trump's entire second term.

Some Canadian provinces have pulled US-made alcohol from their shelves in response to Trump's tariffs.

Canada's oldest brewery is leaning into the country's ongoing trade war levied by President Donald Trump.

Moosehead Breweries, located in the province of New Brunswick that's northeast of Maine, said it's now selling the "Presidential Pack," which includes 1,461 cans of its Canadian Lagers. That's one beer for every day of Trump's term, the brewery said.


"If the start of 2025 has taught us anything, it's that it will take determination to weather four years of political uncertainty—and what better way to make it through each day than with a truly Canadian beer," Karen Grigg, the breweries' director of marketing, said in a press release.

The case is retailed for $3,490 CAD ($2,428 USD) and is available in three provinces: Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Ontario.

Trevor Grant, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Moosehead Breweries, said the "Presidential Pack is something that we as a team have been talking about for a few weeks since some of these challenges with the tariffs and the US administration."

"Obviously, it's a bit of a difficult situation, so trying to maybe have a little bit of fun with it," he said.

Moosehead Breweries' "Presidential Pack" is the latest act of defiance from Canadians against Trump, who has imposed new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Trump has disparaged Canada's prime minister as a "governor."

Canada and Mexico's imports were hit with 25% tariffs, while energy imports from China are 20%. Energy imports from Canada also have a 10% tariff. Although the tariffs went into effect on March 4, Trump backtracked days later and said he's granting a one-month tariffs pause on certain goods from Canada and Mexico.

Canada is the US's largest trading partner. Trump has floated the idea of making Canada the 51st US state, which has also garnered ire from Canadians and led them to boycott US-made products. Canadian officials have said Trump's idea is not a joke.

Moosehead Breweries' Grant said Canadian shoppers are looking for locally made products "now more than ever."

"We do think this is a real opportunity for us," Grant said.

He added that Moosehead Breweries operates "in a small community here in St. John, New Brunswick, and we like to stay connected to our community and give back."

"We'd like to see Canadians do the same thing and buy local," Grant said.

The US liquor and spirits industry is already fearing the pushback.

Lawson Whiting, the CEO of Jack Daniel's parent company, said Canadian provinces pulling US-made alcohol from their stores was "worse than tariffs" in an earnings call this month.

"It's literally taking your sales away," Whitling said, adding that the response seemed "very disproportionate" to the 25% tariff.

Following Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's announcement that he would impose retaliatory 25% tariffs on $155 billion worth of American goods, the Kentucky Distillers' Association said that decision could have "far-reaching consequences across Kentucky, home to 95% of the world's bourbon."

Andrew Oland, the CEO and president of Moosehead Breweries, called the tariffs a "disappointment" during an interview with CTV News on Wednesday.

"We've always had such a close relationship with the United States, and so it's really sad to see this relationship going in a different direction," he said.

 Business Insider
BROWN SHIRT BULLY BOYS

Rubio and Musk turn on Polish foreign minister in spat over Starlink use in Ukraine: ‘Be quiet small man’


John Bowden
Sun, March 9, 2025 

The Trump administration’s top diplomat joined DOGE chief Elon Musk in picking a fight with Poland’s foreign minister on Sunday as the three squabbled over Musk’s Starlink system and its use in Ukraine.

Sunday’s three-way exchange was just the latest example of American foreign relations turning into a blame game as Marco Rubio, the secretary of State, reiterated the White House’s position that Europe was insufficient with its praise and gratitude after three years of US support for Ukraine’s defense.

Poland’s foreign minister, Radosław Sikorski, responded to the Tesla and X/Twitter CEO on social media after Musk barked back at a self-identified MAGA fan who rebuked him and Donald Trump for not treating Russia as the aggressor in the conflict. Musk’s tweet highlighted that his Starlink satellite program was crucial to Ukraine’s defense, and in doing so speculated about the consequences of him turning it off.

He tweeted: “I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off. What I am sickened by is years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose. Anyone who really cares, really thinks and really understands wants the meat grinder to stop. PEACE NOW!!”


Radosław Sikorski was instructed to ‘say thank you’ by Marco Rubio 
(Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved)

Sikorski responded, apparently to the concept of Starlink being turned off, writing that Poland’s government was paying $50m a year for it and warning that Poland would seek another provider “if SpaceX proves to be an unreliable” partner.

He wrote: “Starlinks for Ukraine are paid for by the Polish Digitization Ministry at the cost of about $50 million per year. The ethics of threatening the victim of aggression apart, if SpaceX proves to be an unreliable provider we will be forced to look for other suppliers.”

That set off Musk. He responded with an insult, calling Sikorski “small man”, and argued that no other telecom provider could match Starlink’s capabilities.

He wrote: “Be quiet, small man. You pay a tiny fraction of the cost. And there is no substitute for Starlink.”

It also triggered a response from Rubio, formerly a vocal supporter of Ukraine’s resistance against the Russian invasion. In 2022, he called on the Biden administration to publicly state that the US would support Ukraine’s government “as long as they are willing to fight, even if it’s only an insurgency,” during an interview with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell.

Rubio’s presence at the Oval Office blowup between President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was picked apart on social media, as his critics noted the secretary appeared uncomfortable and remained quiet through the entire combative exchange.

More in Politics

Deleted tweets show top State Department official spread false rumor about Rubio’s sexuality, called him ‘low IQ’
CNN

The secretary wrote in a tweet on Sunday that Sikorski was “[j]ust making things up” by suggesting that Musk was considering ending Starlink’s contracts with the Ukrainian military. “No one has made any threats about cutting Ukraine off from Starlink,” wrote Rubio, adding: “And say thank you because without Starlink Ukraine would have lost this war long ago and Russians would be on the border with Poland right now.”


His latter remark echoed the words of Vance, who’d questioned Zelensky during their confrontation whether the Ukrainian leader had said “thank you” for the continued support of the US government (he had repeatedly done so).

But Musk assured his followers separately that he would not see Starlink services cut off to Ukraine over a dispute with Poland’s foreign minister.


Musk later sought to reassure supporters of Ukraine’s struggle to defend itself against the Russian invasion by saying that Starlink would ‘never turn off its terminals’ (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved)More

“To be extremely clear, no matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals. Without Starlink, the Ukrainian lines would collapse, as the Russians can jam all other communications! We would never do such a thing or use it as a bargaining chip,” he wrote.

His claim about the US using such a service as a “bargaining chip” is rather ill-timed, given that the White House ordered American intelligence agencies to cease real-time cooperation with the Ukrainian military within the past week. In response, Russia has renewed a deadly offensive against Ukrainian defensive positions and civilian centers.


Musk says Ukrainian front would collapse if he turned off Starlink

DPA
Sun, March 9, 2025 


Elon Musk who heads US President Donald Trump's 'Department Of Government Efficiency' (Doge) uses his cellphone camera as President Trump speaks during an Address to Congress in Washington. Carol Guzy/ZUMA Press Wire/dpa

US billionaire Elon Musk has emphasized the importance of his Starlink satellite system for Ukrainian troops fighting Russia.

The Starlink system "is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off," Musk, a close adviser to US President Donald Trump, wrote on X on Sunday.

With the war in mind, Musk wrote that he was tired of years of "slaughter" and said that Ukraine would lose in the end anyway. It is therefore necessary to make peace immediately.

Sikorski gets dressing down

Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski responded to Musk's post on X and wrote that his government would cover Starlink costs for Ukraine to the tune of $50 million a year.

"If SpaceX proves to be an unreliable provider we will be forced to look for other suppliers," he added.

Sikorski's comments sparked an angry reaction from Musk.

The billionaire retorted: "Be quiet, small man. You pay a tiny fraction of the cost." There is no substitute for Starlink, Musk added.

Rubio also weighs in

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio attacked Sikorski, charging in his own X-post that the Polish foreign minister was "just making things up."

More in Politics


Marco Rubio: one-time Russia hawk makes stunning U-turn under Trump
The Guardian
Trump administration briefing: US backs Russia ahead of G7, Republican spending bill boosts defense
The Guardian

"No one has made any threats about cutting Ukraine off from Starlink," Rubio asserted.

"And say thank you because without Starlink Ukraine would have lost this war long ago and Russians would be on the border with Poland right now," the top US diplomat added.



After Poland spat, Musk vows Ukraine can keep Starlink

AFP
Sun, March 9, 2025


US Secretary of State Marco Rubio (R) greets Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski at the State Department on February 21, 2025, weeks before a US-Polish spat erupted over Elon Musk's Starlink company
Andrew Harnik/GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/Getty Images via AF

Billionaire industrialist and senior White House advisor Elon Musk vowed Sunday to maintain Ukraine's access to his Starlink satellite network, after a fierce online clash with Poland's outspoken foreign minister.

The United States has suspended military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine after a disastrous February 28 meeting between presidents Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House.

This has led to fears that Musk, a close Trump ally, might cut off Ukrainian access to his private Starlink communications system, which is used extensively by Kyiv's frontline troops for battlefield communication.




On Sunday, during exchanges on his own X social media platform, Musk promised that this would not be the case, after an online clash with the Polish foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, that drew in US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

"To be extremely clear, no matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals," Musk wrote.

"I am simply stating that, without Starlink, the Ukrainian lines would collapse, as the Russians can jam all other communications! We would never do such a thing or use it as a bargaining chip."

Trump's administration is pressuring Zelensky to sign over much of Ukraine's mineral wealth to the United States and to agree to a ceasefire with Russia without clear security guarantees as a prelude to a peace deal.

Musk supports this position and warned on Sunday that Ukraine's "entire front line would collapse" if he turned off Starlink for Kyiv's forces, which have been battling a full-scale Russian invasion since February 2022.

This prompted Sikorski, in a post on X, to warn: "Starlinks for Ukraine are paid for by the Polish Digitization Ministry at the cost of about $50 million per year.

"The ethics of threatening the victim of aggression apart, if SpaceX proves to be an unreliable provider we will be forced to look for other suppliers."

Musk responded with scorn, telling the Polish minister: "Be quiet, small man. You pay a tiny fraction of the cost. And there is no substitute for Starlink."

Washington's top diplomat, US Secretary of State Rubio, was also drawn in to the exchange, accusing Sikorski of "just making things up."

"No one has made any threats about cutting Ukraine off from Starlink. And say 'thank you' because without Starlink Ukraine would have lost this war long ago and Russians would be on the border with Poland right now," he said.

dc/bbk


Elon Musk and Marco Rubio Bury the Hatchet and Team Up to Bully Key Ally Poland


Julia Ornedo
Sun, March 9, 2025 

Marco Rubio and Elon Musk set aside their bad blood on Sunday to demand a “thank you” from Poland for the satellite internet services the billionaire’s Starlink provides to the Ukrainian army.

In an X post bragging about how he once challenged Russian President Vladimir Putin to a fistfight over the Ukraine war, Musk said the Starlink system developed by his rocket company SpaceX is “the backbone of the Ukrainian army.”

“Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off,” he wrote.

Radosław Sikorski, Poland’s foreign affairs minister, saw the post as a threat.


“Starlinks for Ukraine are paid for by the Polish Digitization Ministry at the cost of about $50 million per year,” he said in reply to the SpaceX CEO. “The ethics of threatening the victim of aggression apart, if SpaceX proves to be an unreliable provider we will be forced to look for other suppliers.”

Before Musk could respond, an unlikely ally stepped in to defend Starlink: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who reportedly blew up at the billionaire last week in a tense Cabinet meeting shouting match.

Rubio accused Sikorski of “just making things up.”

“No one has made any threats about cutting Ukraine off from Starlink,” he said on X. “And say thank you because without Starlink Ukraine would have lost this war long ago and Russians would be on the border with Poland right now.”

Rubio seemingly forgot that Poland shares a border with Russia’s Kaliningrad province, which means that Russians are, quite literally, on the country’s border.

Poland shares a land border to its north with Russia. / Encyclopaedia Britannica / Universal Images Group via Getty

Minutes later, Musk returned to the conversation with his own retort to the Polish official: “Be quiet, small man. You pay a tiny fraction of the cost. And there is no substitute for Starlink.”

Sikorski backed down, thanking Rubio for “for confirming that the brave soldiers of Ukraine can count on the vital internet service provided jointly by the U.S. and Poland.”

But it wasn’t just the Polish minister who saw Musk’s initial post as a threat to cut off Starlink’s services in Ukraine.

Musk issued a clarification in response to other users who called him out for seemingly “threatening” to shut down the satellite internet service.

“To be extremely clear, no matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals,” the billionaire said. “I am simply stating that, without Starlink, the Ukrainian lines would collapse, as the Russians can jam all other communications! We would never do such a thing or use it as a bargaining chip.”

The New York Times last week reported that Musk and Rubio had a tense exchange in front of President Donald Trump during a recent Cabinet meeting.

Musk reportedly tore into the Secretary of State for failing to fire enough people, a mandate the billionaire has been carrying out through his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).



Rubio, who according to the Times has been privately furious with Musk for dismantling USAID, countered that 1,500 State Department staff had already taken an early retirement offer.

Whistleblower complaint expands on claims that Facebook once built a censorship tool to win over China


Former policy director Sarah Wynn-Williams filed a lengthy complaint with the SEC, seen by The Washington Post.



Cheyenne MacDonald
Weekend Editor
Updated Sun, March 9, 2025 



A report from The Washington Post details allegations made by whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams about Facebook in a 78-page complaint filed last April with the SEC, including that the company built a censorship system in hopes to be allowed to operate in China and that it considered allowing the Chinese government to access users’ data in the country. Claims that Facebook developed a content suppression tool to appease China, where it has been blocked since 2009, were first reported as far back as 2016 by The New York Times. Wynn-Williams has a memoir about her time at Facebook, Careless People: A Story of Where I Used to Work, coming out this week.

Wynn-Williams — a former Facebook global policy director who was fired in 2017 — said in the complaint that the company formed a team in 2014 focused on creating a version of Facebook that would comply with China’s laws, under the code-name “Project Aldrin,” The Washington Post reports. In addition to building a censorship system, it was reportedly proposed during negotiations with Chinese officials that the company allow a Chinese private-equity firm to review content posted by users in China, and that Facebook hire hundreds of moderators dedicated to the effort of squashing restricted content.

In a statement to The Washington Post, spokesperson Andy Stone said the company's past interest in the Chinese market is “no secret,” and that CEO Mark Zuckerberg had announced a move away from these efforts in 2019. But Wynn-Williams’ complaint paints a fuller picture of how far Facebook (pre-Meta) was allegedly willing to go to gain a Chinese userbase. Read The Washington Post’s full report here.

Zuckerberg has since become vocal about “free expression” and made changes to how Meta’s platforms approach moderation. Earlier this year, Zuckerberg announced that Facebook and Instagram would end fact-checking and instead adopt X-style Community Notes.




Meta braces for ex-Facebook employee's tell-all book

Max Tani
Sun, March 9, 2025 


The News

Meta is trying to prebunk the claims made by an ex-Facebook employee in what has been described as an explosive insider account. A document from the company first shared with Semafor runs through various details from, a new memoir by Sarah Wynn Williams, a former director of public policy at Facebook.

\The company is pushing back particularly hard on descriptions of its efforts to woo users in China and Myanmar, and the concessions the company considered as it attempted to operate abroad. The Meta document lays out how many of the details in the book were reported in The New York Times, Wired, and other business outlets.

Doctors push back as parents embrace Kennedy and vitamin A in Texas measles outbreak

Chad Terhune
Sat, March 8, 2025 
REUTERS

Dr. Ana Montanez poses for pictures amidst a measles outbreak in Lubbock, Texas

Dr. Ana Montanez points to MMR vaccines in Lubbock, Texas

Dr. Ana Montanez poses for pictures amidst a measles outbreak in Lubbock, Texas

Dr. Ana Montanez poses for pictures amidst a measles outbreak in Lubbock, Texas


(Reuters) -As a measles outbreak spreads across West Texas, Dr. Ana Montanez is fighting an uphill battle to convince some parents that vitamin A - touted by vaccine critics as effective against the highly contagious virus - will not protect their children.

The 53-year-old pediatrician in the city of Lubbock is working overtime to contact vaccine-hesitant parents, explaining the grave risks posed by a disease that most American families have never seen in their lifetime - and one that can be prevented through immunization.

Increasingly, however, she also has to counter misleading information. One mother, she said, told her she was giving her two children high doses of vitamin A to ward off measles, based on an article posted by Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine group led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. nearly a decade before he became President Donald Trump's top health official.

"Wait, what are you doing? That was a red flag," Montanez said in an interview. "This is a tight community, and I think if one family does one thing, everybody else is going to follow. Even if I can't persuade you to vaccinate, I can at least educate you on misinformation."

Kennedy resigned as chairman of Children's Health Defense and has said he has no power over the organization, which has sued in state and federal courts to challenge common vaccines including for measles.

The organization did not respond to a request for comment.




As U.S. health and human services secretary, Kennedy has said vaccination remains a personal choice. He has also overstated the evidence for use of treatments such as vitamin A, according to disease experts.

The supplement does not prevent measles and can be harmful to children in large or prolonged doses, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. It has been shown to decrease the severity of measles infections in developing countries among patients who are malnourished and vitamin A deficient, a rare occurrence in the United States.

"I'm very concerned about the messaging that's coming out," said Dr. Jeffrey Kahn, chief of infectious diseases at Children's Health in Dallas. "It's somewhat baffling to me that we're relitigating the effectiveness of vaccines and alternative therapies. We know how to handle measles. We've had six decades of experience."

Andrew Nixon, a Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson, did not respond to questions about Kennedy's handling of the measles outbreak. But commenting on a measles-related death in New Mexico, Nixon said on Thursday that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "recommends vaccination as the best protection against measles infection."

Texas officials said on Friday that the state's measles outbreak had grown to 198 cases, including 23 people who were hospitalized. That includes the death of an unvaccinated school-age child at a Lubbock hospital last month.

New Mexico officials have tallied 30 cases and one death of an unvaccinated adult. Those are the first deaths from measles in the United States since 2015.

'I'M WILLING TO HOLD OFF'

A 29-year-old nurse who is the mother of three and is a self-described Kennedy fan visited Montanez's clinic on Thursday. She asked to be identified as Nicole C. - her middle name and last initial - to protect her family's privacy.

She said she values the doctor's advice and appreciated that she never felt judged for not fully vaccinating her school-age daughter and toddler twins - a boy and a girl - with a second dose of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine.

After the initial shots, she said she grew more concerned about potential side effects from vaccines and embraced more natural supplements.

She said school officials told her that her daughter would have to miss 21 days of class if she remains under-vaccinated and was exposed to measles.

The risk of contact in Lubbock is real. Montanez called about a dozen families last month because they were exposed to measles in her own waiting room, which she shares with other doctors in the Texas Tech physicians group.



Still, Nicole could not go through with the vaccination during her visit this week. She said she and her husband had prayed about it and believed in their family's God-given immune systems.

"As a mom, you naturally think, 'Oh my goodness, I can't let my daughter miss 21 days of education.' But who knows what effects the vaccine could cause? That could be a lifetime of issues. I'm willing to hold off on the shot," she said.

Public health experts have said vaccines for measles and other diseases pose minimal risks of side effects and protect children and adults against diseases that once routinely killed many people.

As flu season worsened this winter, Nicole said she started giving her children a daily dose of strawberry-flavored cod liver oil, which is high in vitamin A, based on information other mothers had shared with her.

Montanez took her vaccine rejection in stride. The doctor said she has persuaded more than a dozen parents to get their children fully vaccinated in recent weeks.

"I think that leaving her and her family enough space to make their own decisions - and being available for any questions - is really my goal," Montanez said. "My hope is that at some point she's going to call me and say, 'Can we go and get the vaccine?'"

(Reporting by Chad Terhune in Los Angeles; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Will Dunham)

Texas cities run short of MMR vaccine as measles outbreak drives demand

Melody Schreiber
Sat, March 8, 2025 
THE GUARDIAN


A health worker preps a MMR vaccine in Lubbock, Texas, on 1 March
.Photograph: Annie Rice/EPA


As measles cases continue to grow in Texas and New Mexico, with a second death, an unvaccinated adult, reported on Thursday, some Texas cities are seeing shortages amid soaring demand for the highly effective vaccine and as the top US health official, Robert F Kennedy Jr, sows disinformation and mistrust about vaccines.

Ann and Paul Clancy were picking up medications at their local Walgreens in Austin, Texas, on Wednesday and decided to ask the pharmacist about getting the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

The pharmacist said that they were “totally out, and she didn’t know exactly when they would be getting more”, Ann said.

Related: Measles outbreak: how contagious is it and what are the symptoms?

The Clancys wanted to get vaccinated because they have followed the outbreak in the news, including the first measles case detected in Austin last week – an unvaccinated infant who had traveled recently and was not considered part of the wider outbreak of cases.

In addition to keeping themselves safe, the Clancys want to protect their grandchildren and family members with health vulnerabilities.

The pharmacist also mentioned that even doctors’ offices were “having a hard time keeping enough vaccines for kids who needed them”, Ann said.

There are now 198 known cases, 23 hospitalizations and one death from measles in Texas, and 30 known cases and one death in New Mexico.

When customers call Walgreens locations in Austin, they are still able to book appointments for the MMR vaccine – but pharmacists say the doses are out of stock, and that’s true all over the city.

None of the Austin-area Walgreens had MMR vaccines in stock on Thursday, pharmacists said.

Vaccines at CVS pharmacy locations in Austin were also scarce. At least one pharmacy had a few doses left on a first-come, first-served basis. But at another location, the pharmacist said on Friday, “Basically, every location within a 30-mile radius is out.”

At least one CVS in Lubbock – where most of the hospitalized measles patients are being treated – had also run out of stock on Thursday. Some pharmacies in Fort Worth also ran out of the vaccines or had just a handful of doses left on Friday.

Pharmacies at H-E-B, the grocery chain, in Austin are now limiting MMR vaccines to those most at risk, including people born before 1989 who may have only received one dose.

The distributor at Walgreens temporarily ran low on MMR vaccines “due to the spike in demand”, said Carly Kaplan, director of pharmacy communications at Walgreens. But “additional shipments have been arriving this week,” Kaplan said.

“We’re seeing increased demand for the MMR vaccine, but we do still have doses available across our Texas pharmacies and clinics,” said Amy Thibault, lead director of external communications at CVS Pharmacy. “We’re working to get additional vaccine to Texas as quickly as possible.”

H-E-B did not respond to the Guardian’s press inquiry by publication time.

Because measles is such an infectious disease, and the outbreak is already so advanced, it’s difficult to trace contacts and conduct ring vaccinations, said Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine.

Instead, officials should focus on “getting the word out about the importance of vaccinating” and countering misinformation about home remedies, like vitamins, that don’t prevent measles, Hotez said.

In areas with lower vaccination rates, “measles can accelerate”, Hotez said. “Measles is a great exploiter of unvaccinated and undervaccinated populations.”

Williamson county, which contains the northern part of Austin, had a 94.87% rate of MMR vaccination among kindergartners in 2023, according to data from the Texas department of health and human services.

That’s close to the 95% goal that creates population immunity, also called herd immunity, which protects those who are too young to be vaccinated or who don’t respond well to vaccines because they are immune-compromised.

But Travis county, which contains most of Austin, had a rate of 89.61% in 2023 – down from 95.5% in 2020.

The anti-vaccine movement started in the early 2000s and picked up steam in the 2010s, but vaccine hesitancy really surged during the Covid pandemic.

“Now you’re seeing it spill over, once again, into childhood immunizations,” Hotez said. In Texas, “we’ve had a steep rise in personal belief exemption requests – now we’re getting over 100,000.”

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which falls under the US Department of Health and Human Services, is investigating a repeatedly debunked link between vaccines and autism, according to Reuters.

Kennedy has been a major figure in the anti-vaccine movement, as the former chairman of the anti-vaccine organization Children’s Health Defense and the author of several anti-vaccine books.

In an op-ed on Sunday, Kennedy highlighted the importance of vaccines but stopped short of recommending vaccination, instead framing it as a “personal” choice. He wrote about patients dying “with, or of, measles” in the 19th century, casting doubt on the virus’s lethality.

Kennedy, who has no medical background, also amplified the role of vitamin A in measles treatment, but the vitamin does not prevent measles. Nor does cod liver oil, which Kennedy promoted in interviews this week.

It’s unusual for a US health secretary to address outbreaks, Hotez said. Usually state and local health departments take the lead, with the CDC advising or coordinating responses across states.

“The fact that he decided to insert himself, in that role, is interesting, but then to spread disinformation – that really is outrageous,” Hotez said.

Offering remedies such as vitamin A over vaccines “gives people this false sense of security”, Hotez said.

“It’s dangerous because people could make the incorrect decision not to get their kids vaccinated, falsely believing that there are alternatives that actually don’t work – and the result is, if there is a measles epidemic, their child could be hospitalized or worse.”

To halt the outbreak, Hotez said, officials need to stage a major vaccination campaign, “both in terms of setting up vaccine clinics and making them accessible and doing the necessary advocacy around it”.

Experts from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) arrived in Texas on Tuesday and Wednesday, a CDC spokesperson said.

The agency has provided 2,000 doses of the MMR vaccine to officials in Texas and neighboring jurisdictions, and “[the] CDC continues to recommend the MMR vaccine as the best way to prevent measles for children and adults”, the spokesperson said.

But the agency’s advice on vaccines now diverges from past approaches to infectious disease outbreaks in a key way.

“The decision to vaccinate is a personal one,” the CDC spokesperson said.

One in five unvaccinated measles patients usually need to be hospitalized, and nearly one-fifth of children develop pneumonia. One in 600 babies who are not yet eligible for vaccines suffer from a fatal neurological complication, and about one in 1,000 children develop encephalitis, or brain swelling, which can lead to seizures, loss of hearing and intellectual disabilities.

Measles can also cause immune amnesia, where patients’ immune systems “forget” previous infections and vaccinations.

One dose of the MMR vaccine is 93% effective at preventing measles, and two doses are 97% effective. The vaccine is usually given at one year of age, but it can be given as early as six months to protect very young children from the risks of measles.

The CDC on Friday issued a health alert on the “expanding” outbreak, urging providers to be alert to cases and highlighting MMR vaccination.

“We’ve had, now, two deaths and the epidemic is not waning,” Hotez said. “It still has a lot of momentum behind it, and I don’t see it abating anytime soon, unfortunately,”

Paul Clancy hopes that vaccines become a much bigger priority in Texas’s response before more people are sickened or die.

Wall Street Journal: ‘Someone should sue’ Trump over tariffs

Ashleigh Fields
Sat, March 8, 2025 



The Wall Street Journal editorial board took a swipe at President Trump’s recent tariff threats, alleging the administration is using a 48-year-old law to start a trade war.

In a recent op-ed, the board warned of a possible jolt in consumer prices once the tariffs go into full effect and urged someone to file a lawsuit in response.

“The President invokes a law that doesn’t give him power to impose sweeping tariffs,” they wrote in the article’s subhead. “Someone should sue.”

The pressure comes after Trump introduced 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico and levied an additional 10 percent tariff on Chinese imports. The taxes went into effect earlier this week, but the president has issued some exceptions in recent days.

The 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) permits the executive branch to investigate, block, prohibit or regulate any imports and exports with foreign countries in the case of an “unusual or extraordinary threat.”

The Journal’s editorial board further accused Trump of misinterpreting the law.

“He’s treating the North American economy as a personal plaything, as markets gyrate with each presidential whim,” the board wrote. “It’s doubtful Mr. Trump even has the power to impose these tariffs, and we hope his afflatus gets a legal challenge.”

The Journal described Trump’s actions as a “fundamental revision” of the IEEPA statute with direct quotes from the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, a case involving the Environmental Protection Agency’s power to restrict emissions from power plants.

They noted a lack of historical precedent as a clear sign of Trump’s attempt to expand his authority under the guise of the fentanyl opioid crisis as a qualifying “national emergency.”

Under the ruling, the board wrote, “Congress must expressly authorize economically and politically significant executive actions, which Mr. Trump’s tariffs undeniably are.”

“Whether fentanyl is an unusual and extraordinary threat is debatable, however, since drugs have been pouring across the borders for decades,” they continued. “The bigger problem is that IEEPA doesn’t clearly authorize tariffs.”

The board also outlined the limits on presidential tariff authority, referring to a lower court’s decision to uphold former President Nixon’s use of a law predating IEEPA. In that case, Nixon imposed an across-the-board 10 percent tariff to address the nation’s growing trade deficit — which was later subjected to limitations by Congress.

“Mr. Trump’s tariff doesn’t appear reasonably related to the fentanyl emergency,” the Journal’s board wrote. “And Congress seemed to dislike Nixon’s use of emergency powers to deal with trade issues since three years later it gave the President limited authority to impose tariffs.”

“Mr. Trump may have shunned those authorities because he wants carte blanche to impose tariffs,” they added.

The Journal’s latest criticism follows an editorial from earlier this week, where the board slammed Trump for the “dumbest tariff plunge.”

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved.


‘America First’ policies are threatening American exceptionalism as the economy and markets flash warning signs

US stocks are down so far this year. · Fortune · Spencer Platt—Getty Images


Jason Ma
Sat, March 8, 2025 


U.S. outperformance in the global economy and across financial markets is fading as President Donald Trump's tariffs weigh on growth prospects and send investors to seek gains elsewhere. U.S. stocks are down so far this year and the Nasdaq slipped into correction territory, while European and Chinese stocks are soaring.

A few months ago, the U.S. economy and financial markets looked unstoppable, while Europe and China were struggling to break out of prolonged weakness. But that is turning upside down as President Donald Trump presses ahead with a tariff agenda that's meant to put America first.

After predicting continued "American exceptionalism," Wall Street has suddenly turned more pessimistic. On Friday, analysts at Bank of America said "U.S. exceptionalism is fading" and warned recent economic reports point to a growing likelihood of stagflation—a combination of weak growth and high inflation.

Michael Brown, senior research strategist at Pepperstone, was more blunt, saying late Thursday that the dollar is tumbling "with jitters over the state of the U.S. economy continuing to exert considerable pressure, and the 'U.S. exceptionalism' theme now being in tatters."

The White House told Fortune in a statement that tariffs played a key role in America's industrialization, stretching back to the 1800s and President William McKinley.

"President Trump was elected with a resounding mandate to institute his America First economic agenda of tariffs in addition to deregulation, tax cuts, and the unleashing of American energy," spokesman Kush Desai said. "Trillions of dollars in investment commitments from Apple, TSMC, and other industry leaders are indicative of the successes in store for America under President Trump."

To be sure, U.S. growth was already expected to cool a bit from robust gains to still-solid expansion. But in recent weeks, a range of economic indicators has started worsening, including consumer spending and inflation expectations, as tariffs loom.

Surveys of businesses have also highlighted growing concern about tariffs and uncertainty about where they're headed. In addition to tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China, Trump has threatened tariffs on steel, aluminum, the EU, chips, autos, and pharmaceuticals, as well as retaliatory duties across all trade partners.

The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker shows the first quarter is currently on track for a 2.4% contraction after signaling a 1.5% decline last week and reversing from 2.3% growth on Feb. 19. While the widely followed indicator can be volatile and was hammered by a deeper trade deficit, Wall Street analysts are downgrading their U.S. growth views.


On Friday, JPMorgan said the economy would slow toward a 1% pace if tariffs on Canada and Mexico are imposed after large portions were put on a one-month pause. That's down from their earlier view of 2% this year. Meanwhile, others on Wall Street are pricing in greater odds of a recession, though it remains outside the scope of their baseline forecasts.

By contrast, JPMorgan sees the eurozone economy expanding by 2%—unless an intense U.S.-EU trade war erupts. That's as European leaders and Germany's incoming leadership have vowed a seismic break from earlier fiscal austerity and toward debt-fueled spending, especially on defense as the U.S. distances itself from traditional allies and warms up to Russia.

China also plans to ramp up stimulus as Trump has already doubled tariffs on imports from the world's second largest economy to 20%.

The sudden upending of economic prospects is being reflected in stocks. The S&P 500 has lost 2% in the year to date after soaring more than 20% in 2023 and 2024. But Germany's DAX index is up 15.6%, and Hong Kong's Hang Sing index has shot up 21% helped by bullishness on Chinese AI technology.

For this part, Trump said Thursday he isn't watching the stock market as he plans his tariff policies and repeatedly blamed "globalists" for the recent stock selloff.

“We’ve been treated very unfairly as a country,” he said. “We protect everybody. We do everything for all these countries, and a lot of these are globalist in nature.”

In an op-ed on Wednesday, market gurus Ed Yardeni and Eric Wallerstein said they still see a 55% chance of a "Roaring 20s" scenario where the US economy continues to power ahead, fueled by a tech-driven boost.

But they cut the odds of a bullish "meltup" to 10% from 25%, while raising the odds of a bear market and a tariff-induced recession to 35% from 20%.

"We are still betting on the resilience of consumers and the economy," they warned. "However, Trump Turmoil 2.0 is significantly testing the resilience of both."

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com


Trump won't predict whether recession could result from his tariff moves


Doina Chiacu
Sun, March 9, 2025 
REUTERS


Scroll back up to restore default view.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump declined to predict whether the U.S. could face a recession amid stock market concerns about his tariff actions on Mexico, Canada and China over fentanyl.

The Republican president, whose trade policies have rekindled fears of worsening U.S. inflation, was asked if he expected a recession this year in a Fox News interview broadcast on Sunday.

"There is a period of transition, because what we're doing is very big. We're bringing wealth back to America," Trump told the "Sunday Morning Futures" program. "It takes a little time, but I think it should be great for us."

Tariffs have been one key concern for investors, as many believe they can harm economic growth and be inflationary. While Trump acknowledged as early as February 2 that his sweeping tariffs could cause some "short-term" pain for Americans, his own advisers have repeatedly downplayed any negative impact.

"Absolutely not," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday. "There's going to be no recession in America."

Lutnick did acknowledge that the Trump tariffs would lead to higher prices for U.S. consumers on some foreign-made goods, but said American products will get cheaper.

"He's not going to step off the gas," Lutnick said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Trump imposed new 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada last Tuesday, along with fresh duties on Chinese goods, after he declared the top three U.S. trading partners had failed to do enough to stem the flow of deadly fentanyl and its precursor chemicals into the United States.

Two days later, he exempted many imports from Mexico and some from Canada from those tariffs for a month, the latest twist in a fluctuating trade policy that has whipsawed markets and fanned worries about U.S. inflation and growth.

It was the second time in two months that Trump has walked back fentanyl-related tariffs on the U.S. neighbors.

"If fentanyl ends, I think these will come off. But if fentanyl does not end, or he's uncertain about it, he will stay this way until he is comfortable," Lutnick said.

White House officials say Canada and Mexico are conduits for shipments of fentanyl - which is 50 times more potent than heroin - and its precursor chemicals into the U.S. in small packages that are often not inspected.

Public data shows 0.2% of all fentanyl seized in the U.S. comes from the Canadian border, while the vast majority arrives via Mexico. In a concession to Trump, Canada appointed a new fentanyl czar last month.

The exemptions for the two largest U.S. trading partners expire on April 2, when Trump has threatened to impose a global regime of reciprocal tariffs on all U.S. trading partners.

Kevin Hassett, director of the White House's National Economic Council, said on ABC's "This Week" that he hoped the drug-related tariffs can be resolved by the end of the month so the focus can be on imposing the reciprocal measures.

TRADE CONFUSION

Seesaw tariff announcements have unnerved Wall Street as investors say flip-flopping moves by the Trump administration to roll back levies on trading partners are causing confusion rather than bringing relief.

The Trump trade policies have raised fears of trade wars that could slam economic growth and raise prices for Americans still smarting from years of high inflation.

China said it would "resolutely counter" pressure from the United States on the fentanyl issue after Trump imposed tariffs of 20% on all imports from China.

Democratic senators from two border states criticized Trump's tariff policy as inconsistent and irresponsible.

"These broad, indiscriminate and on-again, off-again tariffs don't help anyone. They don't help farmers. They don't help auto workers. They're a mistake," U.S. Senator Adam Schiff of California said on ABC.

"Pounding Canada as if they're the exact same thing as China - it just creates this chaotic feeling," U.S. Senator Elissa Slotkin, of Michigan, said on NBC.

Trump said he put a hold on tariffs on some goods last week because, "I wanted to help Mexico and Canada," according to the "Sunday Morning Futures" interview, which was taped on Thursday.

The three countries are partners in a North American trade pact that was renegotiated by Trump during his first White House term.

Yet Trump also told the Fox News program that those 25% tariffs "may go up" and he said on Friday that his administration could soon impose reciprocal tariffs on Canadian lumber and other products.

Separately, U.S. tariffs of 25% on imports of steel and aluminum will take effect as scheduled on Wednesday, Lutnick said during the interview. Canada and Mexico are both top exporters of the metals to U.S. markets, with Canada in particular accounting for most aluminum imports.


Growing Fear Of 'Trump Recession' Amid Tariff Whiplash And DOGE Chaos

Josh Boak / AP
Sat, March 8, 2025

President Donald Trump delivers remarks in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Friday, March 7, 2025. (Pool via AP) via Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — With his flurry of tariffs, government layoffs and spending freezes, there are growing worries President Donald Trump may be doing more to harm the U.S. economy than to fix it.

The labor market remains healthy with a 4.1% unemployment rate and 151,000 jobs added in February, and Trump likes to point to investment commitments by Apple and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company to show that he’s delivering results.

But Friday’s employment report also found that the number of people stuck working part-time because of economic circumstances jumped by 460,000 last month. In the leisure and hospitality sectors that reflect consumers having extra money to spend, 16,000 jobs were lost. And the federal government reduced its payrolls by 10,000 in a potential harbinger of the alarm being sounded by the stock market, consumer confidence and other measures of where the economy is headed.

Since January, the economic policy uncertainty index has spiked 41% to a level, 334.5, that in the past signaled a recession. Nicholas Bloom, a Stanford University economist and co-developer of the uncertainty index, said it’s unclear how this will play out, but he’s worried.

“I have an increasing fear we will enter into what may become known as the ‘Trump recession,’” he said. “Ongoing policy turbulence and a tariff war could tip the U.S. economy into its first recession in five years.” That last recession occurred under Trump because of the coronavirus pandemic.

For his part, Trump seems comfortable with the uncertainty that he’s generating, saying that any financial pain from import taxes is a mere “disruption” that will eventually lead to more factories relocating to the United States and stronger growth.

If Trump’s gambit succeeds, the Republican would cement his reputation as an unconventional leader who proved doubters wrong. But if Trump’s tariffs backfire, much of the price would be paid by everyday Americans who could suffer from job losses, lower wages, higher inflation and, possibly, an injured sense of national pride.

In an interview to air Sunday on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” Trump was pressed to provide some clarity on his tariffs agenda that has caused uncertainty to fester. The president largely hedged his answer and blamed the 6% drop in the stock market over the past two weeks on “big globalists.”

“You know, the tariffs could go up as time goes by, and they may go up and, you know, I don’t know if it’s predictability,” the president said.

The White House maintains that Friday’s jobs report showed the administration’s strategy is working because manufacturers added 10,000 jobs. Of the manufacturing gains, 8,900 jobs came from the auto sector, recovering some of the industry’s job losses in January. The White House also suggested that the loss of leisure and hospitality jobs was the result of flu season and people having depleted savings and credit card debt because of President Joe Biden’s term.

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in the Financial District in New York City on March 4, 2025. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images) TIMOTHY A. CLARY via Getty ImagesMore

“I thought it was a really, really impressive jobs report,” Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, said of Friday’s numbers.

Hassett said the additional factory jobs were the result of companies “on-shoring” work because of the coming tariffs.

“This is the first of many reports that are going to look like this,” Hassett said with regard to the hiring in the industrial sector.

The stock market selloff raises doubts about whether tariffs will create the promised jobs.

“Markets anticipate,” said John Silvia, CEO of Dynamic Economic Strategy. “The turn down the dark alley of tariffs signals higher inflation, slower economic growth and a weaker U.S. dollar. It is an economic horror movie in slow motion.”

Trump has instigated a trade war in the last week with Canada, Mexico and China, only to then hit a monthlong pause on some of his import taxes because of the threat to U.S. auto factory jobs and because of Mexico’s latest efforts to curb fentanyl smuggling.


More tariffs are coming on April 2 for Europe, Trump says, possibly putting the United States into open conflict with a continent it helped rebuild after World War II. South Korea, India and Brazil could also face new tariffs, Trump said in his address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday.

Silvia said Trump’s tariffs need to be more targeted with regard to products and nations and set at lower rates, adding that doing so would provide an assurance that there is solid research backing the measures.

There were multiple signs of uncertainty and concerns about the tariffs in the Federal Reserve’s beige book, a collection of anecdotes from hundreds of businesses that the Fed releases eight times a year.

Published Wednesday, the beige book included 47 references to uncertainty, up from just 17 in the previous edition in January.

“Many businesses noted heightened economic uncertainty and expressed concern about tariffs,” the Fed’s New York branch reported. “Looking ahead, businesses were notably less optimistic.”

“This is the perfect storm for businesses,” said Brian Bethune, an economist at Boston College. “How can you possibly plan anything in this environment?”

Still, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Friday on CNBC that he sees positive momentum in combating inflation. He said crude oil prices have fallen since Trump’s inauguration, as have the interest rates on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes and mortgages.

Still, interest rates on government debt are higher than they were last year in September, and the recent decline could reflect a slowdown in economic demand.

Bessent suggested a core problem is that the U.S. economy has become overly reliant on government deficits and that the Trump administration would be fostering stronger growth in the private sector.

“We’ve become addicted to this government spending, and there’s going to be a detox period,” he said.

This particular form of economic rehab is coming from Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, which is led by T-shirted tech mogul Elon Musk, the owner of Tesla, X and SpaceX, among other companies.

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 26: Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), stands as U.S. President Donald Trump (R) speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump is holding the first Cabinet meeting of his second term. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images) Andrew Harnik via Getty ImagesMore

The alleged savings by DOGE are still too paltry to bend the troubling trajectory of the national debt that is largely being driven by tax revenues that are insufficient to cover the rising costs of Social Security and Medicare.

But the initiative has started to downsize the federal workforce in ways that could surface in future jobs reports. Roughly 75,000 employees took the deferred resignation plan. There are also thousands of probationary federal workers who were fired and tens of thousands of layoffs to come based on the administration’s plans.

Asked Friday in the Oval Office if the government layoffs could hurt the overall labor market, Trump said the economy would be great.

“I think the labor market is going to be fantastic, but it’s going to have high-paying manufacturing jobs,” he said. ”We had too many people in government. You can’t just do that.”

___

AP economics writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this report.










‘Nobody will trust a US treaty again,’ and Japan’s yen is now the new safe haven currency, strategist says

Fortune · Getty Images


Jason Ma
Sun, March 9, 2025

Quantum Strategy's David Roche said "NATO is dead" as the US distances itself from European allies and warms up to Russia. That makes Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping the big winners and the US the "big loser," he added, with Japan's yen displacing the dollar as the world's safe haven currency.

An American promise is looking more doubtful as the US upends traditional geopolitics, with repercussions in global financial markets, according to Quantum Strategy's David Roche.

In an interview with CNBC on Tuesday, he declared that "NATO is dead," with President Donald Trump distancing the US from long-time European allies and warming up to the Kremlin, which was underscored by his recent shouting match with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky.

That makes Russia's Vladimir Putin and China's Xi Jinping the big winners, as they see confirmation of their views that democratic powers are on the decline, Roche explained.

"The big loser is actually the US, because nobody will trust a US treaty again," he added, noting that a lot of so-called Global South countries will fall into China's orbit as a result.

Trump has long been skeptical of NATO and complained that member countries aren't spending enough on defense.

But since his first term, they have stepped up their outlays, with three-fourths now spending 2% of their GDP or more on their militaries after just the US, UK and Greece met that benchmark in 2015, according to a tally by the Associated Press.

Still, Trump has demanded allies continue boosting expenditures and warned on Thursday that the US won't come their aid if they don't.

"If they don't pay, I'm not going to defend them. No, I'm not going to defend them," he told reporters in the Oval Office.

While some European leaders have publicly maintained that they still see the US as an ally, they are also preparing for a world without a US security shield.

The European Union recently announced plans to increase defense spending by more than $800 billion, as it seeks to step up support for Ukraine while the US pulls back.

Roche predicted Europe will need five to six years, or perhaps even more, to reinvigorate its military capabilities. Meanwhile, the geopolitical turmoil has implications for global financial markets.

“So you want to buy defense," he told CNBC. "You want to keep out of the euro and own the yen, which is now the new safe haven as the US is getting to look very dangerous and US exceptionalism will suffer from the costs of Trump’s commercial tariffs.”

Others have also warned that his tariffs could prompt countries to retaliate outside of the trade arena, including in the debt markets and currency markets by de-dollarizing.

But even before Trump's return to the White House, there has been growing wariness about the dollar. That's after the US and its allies imposed sanctions on Russia following its invasion of Ukraine three years ago.

In particular, the freezing of Russia's dollar and euro assets sparked concerns among other countries that their own greenback holdings could be threatened one day too.

China and Russia have led the de-dollarization movement to reduce their reliance on the dollar in international trade transactions and central bank reserves.

Nassim Taleb, who wrote the book The Black Swan about unpredictable events, has warned that the sanctions and their repercussions are creating risks for the dollar.

“So I’m really afraid of a progressive loss of the role of the dollar,” he told Bloomberg TV in October, adding that “people nominally conduct transactions in dollars, but they don’t store it in dollars, and that is what the problem is.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com


US Inflation Set to Stay Sticky as Tariff Risk Looms



Vince Golle and Craig Stirling
Sun, March 9, 2025 

(Bloomberg) -- US consumer prices probably rose in February at a pace that illustrates plodding progress on inflation for Federal Reserve officials. They may be content to remain on the sidelines to assess a policy whirlwind from the Trump administration.

Bureau of Labor Statistics figures on Wednesday are projected to show that the consumer price index minus food and energy climbed 0.3%, based on the median estimate of economists surveyed by Bloomberg. While less than January’s 0.4% gain in January, the magnitude of the increase leaves annual price growth elevated.

The so-called core CPI probably rose 3.2% from February last year. The data will inform the Fed’s preferred price gauge, which isn’t due until after the March 18-19 policy meeting. Interest-rate setters — now in a blackout period ahead of that gathering — have an inflation goal of 2%.

The latest snapshot of price pressures follows a February jobs report that showed steady payrolls growth tempered by hints of underlying cracks in the labor market. The broader economy is also displaying signs of softening, reflecting weaker consumer spending, sentiment and homebuilding at the start of the year.

President Donald Trump told Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures that the economy faces “a period of transition,” deflecting concerns about the risks of a US slowdown as his early focus on trade and federal job cuts cause market turmoil.


Wednesday also is the day that 25% tariffs for steel and aluminum imports are scheduled to take effect, with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick signaling on Sunday that he doesn’t expect a reprieve from the levies.

On Thursday, data are projected to show similar lingering cost pressures at the economy’s wholesale level. The producer price index, excluding food and fuel, is projected to have risen by 3.5% in February from a year ago.

What Bloomberg Economics Says:

“Chair Jerome Powell has said the Fed needs to see ‘real progress’ on inflation or some labor-market weakness to consider adjusting rates again. After early-year price resets stalled disinflation in January, policymakers will be looking for new progress in February’s CPI. We expect only modest improvement as residual seasonality effects linger: We estimate both headline and core CPI inflation rose 0.3%.”


—Anna Wong, Stuart Paul, Eliza Winger, Estelle Ou & Chris G. Collins, economists. For full analysis, click here

On Friday, a University of Michigan report is projected to show a further decline in consumer sentiment. Traders, as well as Fed officials, will pay particular attention to the survey’s inflation expectations metrics.

For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for the US

The Bank of Canada is widely expected to cut rates by a further 25 basis points on Wednesday if Trump’s sweeping tariff push on Canadian goods persists. Previously, many economists had counted on a pause after recent data showed the economy bounced back strongly in the fourth quarter.


It’s a challenging moment for Governor Tiff Macklem, who successfully wrestled inflation lower and put the country on track for a soft landing — only to face potential stagflation from a trade war instigated by an ally.

Elsewhere, inflation releases from China to Russia, growth data in the UK and a key speech by the European Central Bank president are among highlights.

Click here for what happened last week, and below is our wrap of what’s coming up in the global economy.

Asia

The week kicked off with China’s inflation report, which revealed a drop below zero for the first time in 13 months. While reading was skewed by seasonal distortions, it’s also a reminder of persistent deflationary pressures in the economy.

On Monday, investors will focus on Japan’s labor cost data after nominal wages in December rose at the fastest pace in nearly three decades. Japan will also release current account figures on the day amid increasingly uncertain prospects for global flow of investment and trade.

The country’s current-account surplus hit a record high in 2024, with the yen’s weakness inflating the value of overseas investment returns. A renewed trade war between the US and China, Japan’s two biggest trading partners, hangs heavy over the outlook.


Also on Monday, the State Bank of Pakistan is expected to cut rates to 11.5% to support growth after inflation eased to the lowest in seven years.

On Tuesday, Japan will publish final gross domestic product estimates for the fourth quarter. A strong report may pave the way for further monetary policy tightening.

Australia releases a private survey for businesses which is likely to show the impact on sentiment of the country’s first rate cut in four years. Australia and Indonesia also report consumer confidence data.

On Wednesday, South Korea’s unemployment rate will be closely watched after a steeper-than-expected drop in January.

India’s consumer price growth likely cooled slightly in February which could spur bets for further monetary policy easing. Japan releases fourth-quarter economic and business conditions as well as producer prices, while New Zealand has card spending data. Malaysia and India report industrial output.

Friday will see trade data from South Korea and New Zealand’s food prices.


Also during the week, China publishes credit data as well as foreign direct investment figures which will be closed watched after the country in January recorded the weakest start for inbound investment in four years.

For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for Asia

Europe, Middle East, Africa

A packed week of policymaker appearances is in store for the euro zone following the ECB decision on Thursday to cut rates and avoid giving a clear signal of its next move.

Officials on the schedule include President Christine Lagarde, who’ll make a key speech to a major conference in Frankfurt on euro-zone monetary policy. Chief economist Philip Lane and governors from the region’s four largest economies are on the calendar too.

Among data in the region, euro-zone industrial production on Thursday will give a signal on growth at the start of the year.

Prior to those figures, numbers from Germany will reveal how the country’s sickly manufacturing businesses were faring before Friedrich Merz won the Feb. 23 election. He’s working on a fiscal package that could prove a massive support to the country’s crippled industrial backbone.


Merz’s plan also includes almost unlimited defense spending, an idea also gaining traction elsewhere in Europe. Polls published over the weekend show that the Trump administration’s policy shifts toward Europe and Ukraine are boosting support for increased military outlays in France and the UK.

In Britain, GDP data for January, due on Friday, are predicted to show a third monthly increase, albeit much slower than the spurt seen at the end of last year.

Meanwhile, a senior cabinet minister said on Sunday that the UK will slash the number of civil servants and use artificial intelligence to boost efficiency in the government.

Sweden will release its monthly GDP indicator on Monday, and Riksbank officials will testify to lawmakers the following day.

Norway and Denmark will publish inflation numbers during the week, as will Poland. The Polish central bank is likely to keep borrowing costs steady at a decision on Wednesday. The National Bank of Serbia, meanwhile, may extend its pause in monetary easing for a sixth month.


Turning south, Egypt’s inflation is expected to show a sharp drop in February from 24% a month earlier, paving the way for several rate cuts this year.

Ghana’s finance minister, Cassiel Ato Forson, will present the Mahama administration’s first budget on Tuesday, outlining plans to revive the ailing economy. He may also provide details on International Monetary Fund talks to alter the terms of a $3 billion program that ends next year.

In South Africa, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana will present his own budget in Cape Town on Wednesday, a month after delaying plans because of a coalition disagreement over a proposal to raise taxes. Investors will watch for how far he sticks with fiscal consolidation while holding few options to raise revenue and reduce spending.

Russia will publish inflation figures for February on Wednesday, just over a week before its next rate decision. Bloomberg Economics sees annual price growth reaching 10% before trending lower through the rest of the year.

In Israel, meanwhile, inflation is expected to have eased slightly to 3.7% from 3.8% a month earlier. That report is due on Friday.


For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for EMEA

Latin America

Much watched central bank surveys of economists are on tap in Argentina, where inflation expectations are drifting ever lower, and in Brazil, where they’ve leveled off after a protracted run-up.

Brazil’s February inflation report will likely show a roughly 60 basis-point jump in the year-on-year print to well over 5%, the highest since September 2023.

Brazil also reports industrial production, retail sales, budget and lending data in the coming week.

While tighter financial conditions — Brazil’s central bank has tipped a third-straight 100 basis-point rate hike at its March 19 meeting — have yet to bring inflation and expectations to heel, retail sales and industry finished off 2024 on the defensive.

In Peru, the central bank is likely quite close to drawing a line under its post-pandemic easing cycle.

Inflation in February slowed to 1.48%, below the 2% mid-point off the central bank’s 1%-to-3% target range, although policymakers led by President Julio Velarde may still opt to hold at 4.75%.


Industrial production, wage data, consumer confidence and same-store sales are on tap in Mexico.

Argentina’s national inflation all but certainly slowed for 10th month, possibly sinking below 70% — down from 289.4% last April. The monthly reading may cool from January’s 2.2% print and local analysts see further disinflation ahead: they forecast 23.2% for year-end 2025 and 9.4% by 2027.

For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for Latin America

--With assistance from Greg Sullivan, Laura Dhillon Kane, Mark Evans, Monique Vanek, Piotr Skolimowski, Robert Jameson, Swati Pandey and Beril Akman.

(Updates with Trump comments in fifth paragraph)

 Bloomberg Businessweek