Tuesday, May 27, 2025

 

Less bitter, just as satiating



New study on pea protein hydrolysates delivers surprising findings




Leibniz-Institut für Lebensmittel-Systembiologie an der TU München

First author Katrin Gradl at work in the cell culture lab 

image: 

First author Katrin Gradl at work in the cell culture lab of the Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology

view more 

Credit: photo: Joseph Krpelan / Leibniz-LSB@TUM




A recent study by the Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich shows that less bitter-tasting pea protein hydrolysates can induce just as strong satiety signals in stomach cells as their more bitter counterparts. The key factor is that new bitter-tasting protein fragments are formed in the gastric juice during digestion, which stimulate the release of gastric acid and the neurotransmitter serotonin – both signals contribute significantly to the feeling of satiety in the body. The study results open up new perspectives for the development of plant-based foods that combine health, pleasant taste, and sustainability in a useful way.

Pea protein hydrolysates are powders made from enzymatically or chemically broken down pea proteins. They consist of a mixture of small protein fragments, known as peptides, and free amino acids. They are currently gaining importance in food production because they are considered easily digestible, have a high-quality amino acid profile, and promote satiety.

“However, a major drawback is their often intense bitter taste, which many consumers dislike,” explains Katrin Gradl, first author of the study and doctoral candidate at the Leibniz Institute. “Our goal was therefore to find ways to overcome this taste barrier without losing the satiating effect of the products,” adds principal investigator Veronika Somoza.

The challenge

However, bitter peptides can trigger signals in the stomach that increase the feeling of satiety. Simply reducing the bitter taste of protein hydrolysates could therefore also reduce the satiety effect. “However, our previous studies with milk proteins had shown that such bioactive, bitter-tasting peptides do not necessarily have to be present in the starting product, but can also be formed in the gastric juice during digestion,” explains co-author Phil Richter from Veronika Somoza's team.

Against this background, the research team simulated the gastric digestion of a bitter and a less bitter protein hydrolysate using artificial gastric fluid and then analyzed the newly formed peptides.

Digestion products with a satiating effect

Using chemical and computer-assisted analysis methods as well as sensory tests, the research team identified three bitter peptides in each of the two digestion products. All six peptides stimulated the secretion of gastric acid and the release of serotonin in a human stomach cell line, regardless of the original bitterness of the product. “It was remarkable that the peptides from the less bitter-tasting hydrolysate stimulated serotonin release particularly strongly,” reports Katrin Gradl. In addition, the researchers demonstrated that two types of bitter receptors were involved in inducing satiety signals in the cellular test system.

Conclusion: Even less bitter-tasting pea protein hydrolysates can form bioactive peptides during digestion in gastric fluid, which induce satiety signals via bitter taste receptors. However, Veronika Somoza emphasizes: “Human studies are needed to definitively assess the influence of these peptides on human eating behavior and weight control.” Nevertheless, the study already reveals molecular mechanisms that can be used to optimize the taste of protein hydrolysates in a targeted manner—without limiting the satiating effects triggered by bitter-tasting compounds.

Publication:

Gradl, K., Richter, P., and Somoza, V. (2025). Bitter peptides formed during in-vitro gastric digestion induce mechanisms of gastric acid secretion and release satiating serotonin via bitter taste receptors TAS2R4 and TAS2R43 in human parietal cells in culture. Food Chem 482, 144174. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144174

Funding:

The IGF project 21916 N of the research association Forschungskreis der Ernährungsindustrie e.V. (FEI) was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) as part of the program for promoting Industrial Collective Research (IGF) based on a resolution of the German Parliament.

More Information:

Plant proteins are considered an environmentally friendly alternative to animal proteins, as their production requires about five to ten times less energy and water and around 80 percent less agricultural land.

Morbid obesity (adiposity) is considered a widespread disease with serious consequences such as type 2 diabetes and certain types of cancer. A protein-rich diet can help to better control body weight as it increases satiety and thus counteracts excessive energy intake. Studies have also shown that encapsulated bitter tasting compounds induce satiety in healthy adults by activating extraoral bitter taste receptors.

Serotonin is one of the most important hormones that regulate food intake. More than 90 percent of the serotonin in our body is found in certain cells of the gastrointestinal mucosa and the nervous system.

Both the intestines and the stomach are involved in hormonal hunger and satiety regulation. Some bitter-tasting compounds can stimulate gastric acid secretion, increase serotonin release from stomach cells, delay gastric emptying, and have a satiating effect. Interestingly, protein fragments such as bitter-tasting peptides and amino acids are also among the bitter-tasting compounds with a satiating effect.

Read also:

Tracking down satiety mechanisms in the stomach / Bitter protein fragments stimulate gastric acid secretion https://www.leibniz-lsb.de/en/press-public-relations/translate-to-englisch-press...

Information about the Institute:

The Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich (Leibniz-LSB@TUM) comprises a new, unique research profile at the interface of Food Chemistry & Biology, Chemosensors & Technology, and Bioinformatics & Machine Learning. As this profile has grown far beyond the previous core discipline of classical food chemistry, the institute spearheads the development of a food systems biology. Its aim is to develop new approaches for the sustainable production of sufficient quantities of food whose biologically active effector molecule profiles are geared to health and nutritional needs, but also to the sensory preferences of consumers. To do so, the institute explores the complex networks of sensorically relevant effector molecules along the entire food production chain with a focus on making their effects systemically understandable and predictable in the long term.

The Leibniz-LSB@TUM is a member of the Leibniz Association, which connects 96 independent research institutions. Their orientation ranges from the natural sciences, engineering and environmental sciences through economics, spatial and social sciences to the humanities. Leibniz Institutes address issues of social, economic and ecological relevance.They conduct basic and applied research, including in the interdisciplinary Leibniz Research Alliances, maintain scientific infrastructure, and provide research-based services. The Leibniz Association identifies focus areas for knowledge transfer, particularly with the Leibniz research museums. It advises and informs policymakers, science, industry and the general public.

Leibniz institutions collaborate intensively with universities – including in the form of Leibniz ScienceCampi – as well as with industry and other partners at home and abroad. They are subject to a transparent, independent evaluation procedure. Because of their importance for the country as a whole, the Leibniz Association Institutes are funded jointly by Germany’s central and regional governments. The Leibniz Institutes employ around 21,300 people, including 12,200 researchers. The financial volume amounts to 2,2 billion euros.


Original publication:

Gradl, K., Richter, P., and Somoza, V. (2025). Bitter peptides formed during in-vitro gastric digestion induce mechanisms of gastric acid secretion and release satiating serotonin via bitter taste receptors TAS2R4 and TAS2R43 in human parietal cells in culture. Food Chem 482, 144174. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144174


More information:

Tracking down satiety mechanisms in the stomach / Bitter protein fragments stimulate gastric acid secretion https://www.leibniz-lsb.de/en/press-public-relations/translate-to-englisch-pressemitteilungen/pm-20221011-press-release-bitter-peptides-gastric-acid

 

New study on the global race for future battery technologies



Researchers highlight growing polarisation of innovation priorities / Europe and the United States risk falling behind



University of Münster





Next-generation battery technologies play an important role in the energy and mobility transition. A research team from the Universities of Münster (Germany) and Cambridge (United Kingdom) and the Fraunhofer Research Institution for Battery Cell Production (Fraunhofer FFB), Münster, has analysed global competition in this field by comparing patents and innovation strategies across various regions, focusing on next-generation battery technologies for electric vehicles. The study identifies the positions of different regions (China, Japan, South Korea, Europe and the United States) regarding their technological priorities and innovation strategies. The researchers considered future battery technologies for high-energy applications as well as future technologies for low cost applications. They conclude that Europe and the United States risk losing the race for leadership in future battery technologies.

The study reveals an increasing polarisation between Asia and Western nations. While countries in Asia (China, Japan and South Korea) systematically focus their innovation efforts on future battery technologies, the West (particularly Europe and the United States) mainly focuses on improving today’s lithium-ion battery technologies. Specifically, these regions are pursuing different strategic orientations. For example, Japan and South Korea are focussing on high-energy batteries of the future, and China is addressing both application profiles, i.e. high-performance batteries with high energy density and low-cost batteries. Europe and the United States, on the other hand, are primarily advancing developments along the established lithium-ion battery value chain.

The researchers note that the innovation gap between Asia and the West could further widen, eventually threatening the technological autonomy and long-term competitiveness of Europe and the United States in both future high-energy batteries and lower-cost alternatives. “Europe and the United States need to urgently increase their investments in future battery value chains and promote the transfer of knowledge and technology with leading battery developers and manufacturers from Asia,” says Prof Stephan von Delft, professor of business chemistry at the University of Münster.

The quantity and quality of patents provide insights into a country's innovation performance. Innovation strategies reflect political priorities and measures such as national funding programmes. “Together, they offer a suitable means for assessing geostrategic competition and the positioning of individual countries in future battery technologies,” explains André Hemmelder, doctoral student and first author of the study.

 

Refugees benefit from psychosocial support, but also need work and friends



Radboud University Nijmegen





Refugees are more likely to suffer from mental health problems than the average person due to their migration experiences and socio-economic status. Psychosocial support helps, but it should not stand alone. Further investment is needed in the social lives of refugees and undocumented migrants, for example by giving them access to work and education. This is the argument put forward by social scientist Tessa Ubels. “People often come to see their psychologist as a friend. That is not a problem in itself, but it is if they have no other friends.” Ubels will defend her thesis at Radboud University on 2 June.

The psychosocial consequences of (forced) migration are significant. Migrants often struggle with stress, loss and feelings of exclusion. “We already know that psychosocial support helps combat anxiety and depression,” explains Ubels. "But we didn't know much about the role of psychosocial support in the social lives of refugees. If your mental health is not so good, this often has an impact on your social life, because you tend to socialise less. When people have fewer social contacts, support programmes are less effective."

To map out this social situation, Ubels asked people how many contacts they had in their new environment and whether they were working. “Conversations with a psychologist work particularly well if someone also talks to friends or acquaintances in the area and is not solely dependent on the psychologist.”

The Netherlands and Uganda

Ubels conducted extensive research among a group of undocumented migrants in the Netherlands and refugees in Uganda. In the Netherlands, this includes rejected asylum seekers who are sometimes unable to return to their home countries and people whose residence permits have expired. “This is a group that is in a very vulnerable position,” says the researcher. “There are an estimated 40,000 undocumented migrants in the Netherlands, but because they often remain under the radar, it is difficult to keep in touch with them.”

In Uganda, it was easier to talk to refugees. Ubels visited a settlement there that has existed for almost 70 years and is home to more than 170,000 refugees. “In that community, refugees' rights are well regulated, but there are insufficient facilities. It's the other way around for undocumented migrants in the Netherlands: there is enough healthcare here, but this group has limited access to it."

Bread on the table

The people she followed participated in various aid programmes. In the Netherlands, there were undocumented migrants who regularly had conversations with a psychologist, while others attended group workshops or exchanged experiences with others about coping with stress or accessing healthcare. In Uganda, Ubels followed a programme in which refugees help each other in difficult situations.

“Psychosocial support is important to give people more confidence in themselves and in their future,” says Ubels. "But it is not the solution. In the Ugandan programme, refugees also set up their own small businesses or grow food, enabling them to support themselves. And in the Netherlands, people who do some (voluntary) work are often better off because people see them. If you want aid programmes to work in the long term, the basic conditions must be in place: enough money and food in the house." These basic conditions are coming under increasing pressure due to cuts in development cooperation and stricter migration policies.

According to Ubels, refugees and undocumented migrants in the Netherlands also benefit from aid programmes that are not specifically aimed at this target group. "Of course, there must be an approach that is specifically tailored to their situation, but some of the problems within this group are also societal, such as poverty or loneliness. By creating places where people from different backgrounds can come together, you create more diverse social networks. These kinds of initiatives already exist, mainly at neighbourhood level, and can be expanded. This means that refugees are no longer dependent on a single aid organisation."

 

How Japan’s older adults adapted to healthcare challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic



Researchers analyze trends in healthcare utilization among older Japanese adults during the extended COVID-19 pandemic



Waseda University

Trends in healthcare utilization among older Japanese adults during the extended COVID-19 pandemic 

image: 

Initial responses to the COVID-19 outbreak have been well assessed and documented. However, the impact of the extended phases of the pandemic, particularly on vulnerable populations, remains unclear. Researchers from Waseda University, Japan, have analyzed trends in healthcare utilization among older adults aged 75 years and above during the prolonged pandemic. The study provides novel insights into healthcare adaptations that can improve accessibility for the elderly while minimizing their crisis-related risk.

view more 

Credit: Rong Fu from the Faculty of Commerce, Waseda University, Japan





Public healthcare emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, can drastically disrupt healthcare systems with long-term repercussions. The effects of such healthcare crises are more pronounced in the aging population, who are particularly vulnerable to chronic infections and sudden disruptions in healthcare.

The COVID-19 outbreak that emerged in December 2019 quickly spread worldwide, and several emergency measures were urgently implemented to curb its transmission. During the initial phase of the pandemic, stringent measures like social distancing, isolation, and mandatory wearing of masks were implemented. Unfortunately, older individuals were at a higher risk of acquiring the infection and were more likely to experience negative outcomes. The fear of infection, coupled with the state of emergency (SoE) declarations, has led to older adults refraining from seeking necessary medical care.

While initial responses to the pandemic have been well-documented, its long-term impact on healthcare utilization and access among the elderly remains unclear. Furthermore, the prolonged pandemic was characterized by the spread of relatively less virulent strains, gradual relaxation of stringent measures, and widespread vaccination, with limited data on the effect of this transition.

To bridge this knowledge gap, researchers from Waseda University, Japan, sought to analyze the effects of the extended phase—from November 2021 to September 2022—on older adults in Japan, one of the world’s most aged societies with a universal healthcare system. The team comprised of Associate Professor Rong Fu from the Faculty of Commerce, master’s student Sizhe Liu from the Graduate School of Commerce, Assistant Professor Masato Oikawa from the Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Professor Haruko Noguchi from the Faculty of Political Science and Economics, and Professor Akira Kawamura from the Faculty of Human Sciences.

Explaining the rationale behind their research, Fu, the lead author, says, “As populations age globally, maintaining healthcare access during public health emergencies becomes increasingly critical. Our research addresses this challenge by providing insights into how healthcare systems can balance infection control with continued access to essential services for vulnerable elderly populations.” Their findings were published online in Scientific Reports by Nature Research on April 22, 2025.

The researchers used a comprehensive dataset of 189,841,257 medical claims linked with income tax records from the long-term care insurance system to analyze trends in healthcare utilization among Japan’s oldest-old population aged 75 years and above. They correlated trends in healthcare access and utilization with the implementation of public health measures, crisis severity, and socioeconomic status.

The analysis revealed that the implementation of precautionary measures led to a modest drop in the use of medical services and outpatient visits. Nevertheless, healthcare costs and services remained stable despite a decrease in patient volumes. The use of medical services varied across different residential areas depending on crisis severity and the extent of precautionary measures. Notably, there was no difference in healthcare utilization across different income levels except for dental services. Dental care visits by older adults with a lower income were significantly lower than high-income groups, highlighting socioeconomic disparities in dental care during public emergencies.

Overall, these findings suggest that healthcare adaptations can address the needs of the elderly during medical emergencies and help avoid medical delays with dire consequences. Adaptations may include integrated monitoring systems, enhanced safety protocols to bridge gaps in preventive dental care, early warning systems, and flexible delivery options, such as remote or mobile care, to improve accessibility for vulnerable groups.

“Our findings can help inform policymakers who devise targeted interventions to prevent socioeconomic disparities in healthcare access from widening during crises. Additionally, for healthcare providers, our research demonstrates the importance of maintaining service intensity even when visit frequency fluctuates,” Fu adds.

Newly confirmed COVID-19 cases and governmental emergency responses. Notes: COVID-19 case data were obtained from the official governmental website. Data collection ended on May 7, 2023, due to the reclassification of COVID-19 to a Category V Infectious Disease. Information regarding the enforcement of SoE and SoPE policies was gathered from the official website of the Cabinet Agency for Infectious Diseases Crisis Management. The gray shaded area in both graphs denotes the study period.

 

***

Reference

Authors: Rong Fu1, Sizhe Liu2, Masato Oikawa3, Haruko Noguchi4, and Akira Kawamura5

Title of original paper: Healthcare utilization among Japanese older adults during later stage of prolonged pandemic

Journal: Scientific Reports                                                         

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-98908-x

Affiliations         

1Faculty of Commerce, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Japan

2Graduate School of Commerce, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Japan 3Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Japan

4Faculty of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Japan

5Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan

 

About Waseda University

Located in the heart of Tokyo, Waseda University is a leading private research university that has long been dedicated to academic excellence, innovative research, and civic engagement at both the local and global levels since 1882. The University has produced many changemakers in its history, including nine prime ministers and many leaders in business, science and technology, literature, sports, and film. Waseda has strong collaborations with overseas research institutions and is committed to advancing cutting-edge research and developing leaders who can contribute to the resolution of complex, global social issues. The University has set a target of achieving a zero-carbon campus by 2032, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations in 2015. 

To learn more about Waseda University, visit https://www.waseda.jp/top/en  

About Associate Professor Rong Fu from Waseda University

Dr. Rong Fu is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Commerce, Waseda University. Her research focuses on health economics and policy, with particular emphasis on healthcare utilization patterns among elderly populations and the socioeconomic determinants of health disparities. She has authored several publications spanning these research areas.


Panel A shows the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases (in tens of thousands) across eight epidemic waves in Japan from January 2020 to June 2023. Panel B illustrates the timing and extent of government declarations: State of emergency (SoE, blue) and semi-state of Emergency (SoPE, green), indicated by the number of affected prefectures. The shaded area marks the study period. Peaks in intervention measures generally correspond to rises in case numbers.

Credit

Rong Fu from the Faculty of Commerce, Waseda University, Japan

 

Without public trust, effective climate policy is impossible



When formulating climate policy, too little attention is paid to social factors and too much to technological breakthroughs and economic reasons.




Radboud University Nijmegen





When formulating climate policy, too little attention is paid to social factors and too much to technological breakthroughs and economic reasons. Because citizens are hardly heard in this process, European governments risk losing public support at a crucial moment in the climate debate. This is the conclusion of several researchers from Radboud University in a paper published this week in Earth System Governance.

Without public trust, effective climate policy is impossible, warns Vincent de Gooyert, sociologist and lead author of the article. "You see this, for example, in the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS). This technology is essential for achieving climate targets, but it is still barely off the ground. Industry wants government subsidies, the government says there is no public support for this, and society wants to see industry take responsibility first. But then you're stuck in a vicious circle."

No market value, but essential

The climate debate is currently often framed from a techno-economic perspective, explains De Gooyert. “Every solution must have direct market value. If that is lacking, no one is willing to take the first step. But a solution such as CCS has no direct market value. In addition to technology, regulations and subsidies, you really need that support, because a policy without support mainly results in resistance.”

De Gooyert collaborated with colleagues Senni Määttä, Sandrino Smeets and Heleen de Coninck on the article. Their recommendations are based, among other things, on extensive experience with discussions between government, business, citizens and other stakeholders on climate issues. They work with environmental organisations, industry and governments in European countries including Finland, Sweden, Spain and Belgium.

Trust

"What keeps coming back is that policy only works if there is mutual trust. People often think that if we explain it well, support will come naturally. But then you mainly have one-way communication, and research shows that this can be counterproductive. What you end up with is people thinking: there go those arrogant policymakers again, telling us what's good for us, and if we don't agree, they'll push it through anyway."

De Gooyert and his colleagues advocate the use of independent, scientific advisory councils, but also initiatives such as citizens' councils. "Citizens must be able to form an informed opinion independently, and there must be room for complexity and nuance. We must be honest with each other in such sessions: there are difficult choices to be made, but people must be given openness about the options and the consequences. Citizens deserve a say in their environment. To offer comfort to local residents, governments and businesses will also have to make sacrifices. We won't get there with the current method. Then we'll remain in the situation we're in now: no one willing to take big steps on climate policy, while time is running out."