Wednesday, May 28, 2025

 

VR could help train employees working with robots



Virtual reality gives workers an immersive digital environment to practice complex tasks



University of Georgia





Working with robots is becoming more common in the recycling industry, helping automate tasks and making complicated work easier.  But training human employees to work with robots can be difficult and time consuming.

Researchers from the University of Georgia created a new virtual reality space to help make training faster and easier.

One task that often requires robotic help is disassembly. It’s critical for recycling parts and valuable materials from electronics nearing the end of their lifespan. However, disassembly tasks often present their own challenges.

“Unlike assembly, which has a very standard procedure, disassembly is slightly more complicated,” said Beiwen Li, corresponding author of the study and an associate professor in UGA’s College of Engineering. “It may not work out the best if we just inverse the whole assembly procedure.”

The researchers developed VR Co-Lab to help ease confusion. By training employees digitally, not only can they practice disassembling recyclables without damaging materials, but they can also learn to avoid injury and collisions with the robot.

Using virtual reality to cut training time

In the virtual space, users practiced taking apart a hard disk with a robot’s help.

When users put on their headset, they found themselves in a virtual workstation like what they’d encounter on the job. They saw the various tools and machinery needed for disassembly, as well as the robot helping them.

During training, workers followed a step-by-step procedure for disassembling the hard disk. Human users handled more precise tasks like unscrewing or picking and placing small bolts, while the robot arm managed larger bolts and loose items. The program also provided feedback to the user, measuring how long it took to complete the session and how many mistakes users made.

“There are a lot of tasks. It requires a complicated training for workers, typically,” Li said. “So, if we have a VR system, that will be very helpful in shortening training time. It is much easier than having pages and pages of written documents to be read by the user.”

Boosting performance while keeping workers safe

One key part of the VR system is body tracking.

VR Co-Lab uses Meta Quest Pro, which uses its cameras to track upper body movements in the wrists, elbows, shoulders and torso. This helps the program plan the robot’s movements based on the user’s actions, preventing collisions and improving interactivity between the human and robot.

The program warns of potential hazards that could lead to injury, such as collisions with the robot arm, while teaching users how to avoid them. The system can also be used to figure out how quickly the robot arm can work without overwhelming the employee.

"Robots are going to be important for the future of the recycling industry.” — Beiwen Li, College of Engineering

Li and his team are planning more extensive user testing in the future to ensure the system is helpful for a variety of skill levels and applicable to tasks outside of disassembling hard disks. Improving the training process will be valuable as using robots becomes more common.

“Robots are going to be important for the future of the recycling industry because they can do a lot of disassembly steps automatically. That can help reduce the labor shortage,” Li said. “Because disassembly is so complicated, it involves a human to work together with a robot. And that’s basically our motivation for developing this VR system for training.”

The study was published in Machines and funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. It was co-authored by Yashwanth Maddipatla of Iowa State University, and Sibo Tian, Xiao Liang and Minghui Zheng of Texas A&M University.

Journal

DOI

Article Title

Mid-air transformation helps flying, rolling robot to transition smoothly



New research from Caltech’s Center for Autonomous Systems and Technologies finds robots that morph before landing are more robust



California Institute of Technology

Mid-Air Transformation Helps Flying, Rolling Robot to Transition Smoothly 

image: 

The ATMO (aerially transforming morphobot) robot transforms from its flying, quadrotor configuration midair as it approaches the ground. It is then able to roll away in its driving configuration. Caltech researchers developed a sophisticated control system for ATMO that uses an advanced control method called model predictive control, which works by continuously predicting how the system will behave in the near future and adjusting its actions to stay on course.

view more 

Credit: Ioannis Mandralis/Communications Engineering





Specialized robots that can both fly and drive typically touch down on land before attempting to transform and drive away. But when the landing terrain is rough, these robots sometimes get stuck and are unable to continue operating. Now a team of Caltech engineers has developed a real-life Transformer that has the "brains" to morph in midair, allowing the dronelike robot to smoothly roll away and begin its ground operations without pause. The increased agility and robustness of such robots could be particularly useful for commercial delivery systems and robotic explorers.

The new robot, dubbed ATMO (aerially transforming morphobot), uses four thrusters to fly, but the shrouds that protect them become the system's wheels in an alternative driving configuration. The whole transformation relies on a single motor to move a central joint that lifts ATMO's thrusters up into drone mode or down into drive mode.

The researchers describe the robot and the sophisticated control system that drives it in a paper recently published in the journal Communications Engineering.

"We designed and built a new robotic system that is inspired by nature—by the way that animals can use their bodies in different ways to achieve different types of locomotion," says Ioannis Mandralis (MS '22), a graduate student in aerospace at Caltech and lead author of the new paper. For example, he says, birds fly and then change their body morphology to slow themselves down and avoid obstacles. "Having the ability to transform in the air unlocks a lot of possibilities for improved autonomy and robustness," Mandralis says.

But midair transformation also poses challenges. Complex aerodynamic forces come into play both because the robot is close to the ground and because it is changing its shape as it morphs.

"Even though it seems simple when you watch a bird land and then run, in reality this is a problem that the aerospace industry has been struggling to deal with for probably more than 50 years," says Mory Gharib (PhD '83), the Hans W. Liepmann Professor of Aeronautics and Medical Engineering, director and Booth-Kresa Leadership Chair of Caltech's Center for Autonomous Systems and Technologies (CAST), and director of the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology (GALCIT). All flying vehicles experience complicated forces close to the ground. Think of a helicopter, as an example. As it comes in for a landing, its thrusters push lots of air downward. When that air hits the ground, some portion of it bounces back up; if the helicopter comes in too quickly, it can get sucked into a vortex formed by that reflected air, causing the vehicle to lose its lift.

In ATMO's case, the level of difficulty is even greater. Not only does the robot have to contend with complex near-ground forces, but it also has four jets that are constantly altering the extent to which they are shooting toward each other, creating additional turbulence and instability.

To better understand these complex aerodynamic forces, the researchers ran tests in CAST's drone lab. They used what are called load cell experiments to see how changing the robot's configuration as it came in for landing affected its thrust force. They also conducted smoke visualization experiments to reveal the underlying phenomena that lead to such changes in the dynamics.

The researchers then fed those insights into the algorithm behind a new control system they created for ATMO. The system uses an advanced control method called model predictive control, which works by continuously predicting how the system will behave in the near future and adjusting its actions to stay on course.

"The control algorithm is the biggest innovation in this paper," Mandralis says. "Quadrotors use particular controllers because of how their thrusters are placed and how they fly. Here we introduce a dynamic system that hasn't been studied before. As soon as the robot starts morphing, you get different dynamic couplings—different forces interacting with one another. And the control system has to be able to respond quickly to all of that."

Additional Caltech authors of the paper, "ATMO: An aerially transforming morphobot for dynamic ground-aerial transition" are Reza Nemovi, a design engineer in aerospace;  and Richard M. Murray (BS '85), the Thomas E. and Doris Everhart Professor of Control and Dynamical Systems and Bioengineering. Co-author Alireza Ramezani, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at Northeastern University, is currently a visitor in aerospace at Caltech. The work was supported by funding from the Center for Autonomous Systems and Technologies at Caltech.


Caltech researchers used smoke visualization to better understand the complex forces at play during ATMO's midair transformation close to the ground.

Credit

Ioannis Mandralis/Communications Engineering

MOTHER'S LOVE

Mother’s warmth in childhood influences teen health by shaping perceptions of social safety



UCLA researchers say findings can inform public health campaigns to support parents, teenagers, schools



University of California - Los Angeles Health Sciences





Parental warmth and affection in early childhood can have life-long physical and mental health benefits for children, and new UCLA Health research points to an important underlying process: children’s sense of social safety.

The study, published in JAMA Psychiatry, found that children who experience more maternal warmth at age 3 have more positive perceptions of social safety at age 14, which in turn predicts better physical and mental health outcomes at age 17.

Greater maternal warmth, defined as more praise, positive tone of voice and acts of affection, has previously been shown to predict better health across the lifespan. However, the mechanisms underlying these associations have been unclear, said Dr. Jenna Alley, lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow in the Laboratory for Stress Assessment and Research at UCLA.

One possibility is that interpersonal experiences early in life affect whether children perceive the social world as safe vs. threatening, accepting vs. rejecting and supportive vs. dismissive. Over time, these perceptions develop into mental frameworks, called social safety schemas, which help individuals interpret, organize, and make predictions about social situations and relationships.

“Your social safety schema is the lens through which you view every social interaction you have,” Alley said. “In a way, these schemas represent your core beliefs about the world, what you can expect from it, and how you fit in.”

The UCLA Health study is the first longitudinal research to track how maternal warmth in early childhood is related to perceptions of social safety in mid adolescence, and how perceptions of social safety influence physical and mental health outcomes as youth near adulthood.

Warmth from fathers was not studied because there was insufficient data from fathers in the dataset used in the study from the Millenium Cohort Study. Parental warmth care has been historically overlooked in research, Alley said, although preliminary research suggests that the quality of care that fathers provide also predicts child outcomes and should thus be a focus of future research.

Researchers used data from more than 8,500 children who were assessed as part of long-term Millennium Cohort Study in the United Kingdom. Independent evaluators visited the children’s homes at age 3 and assessed their mother’s warmth (praise, positive tone of voice) and harshness (physically restraining or grabbing the child). At age 14, social safety schemas were measured with questions such as “Do I have family and friends who help me feel safe, secure and happy?” The children then reported on their overall physical health, psychiatric problems and psychological distress at age 17.

Alley and her colleagues found:

  • Children with mothers exhibiting more maternal warmth in early childhood perceived the world as being more socially safe at age 14 and had fewer physical health problems at age 17.
  • Children who perceived the world as more socially safe at age 14 in turn had fewer physical health problems, less psychological distress and fewer psychiatric problems at age 17.
  • Children’s social safety schemas fully explained the association between maternal warmth and how psychologically distressed youth were at age 17.
  • In contrast, maternal harshness did not predict children’s perceptions of social safety at 14, or their physical or mental health at age 17.

“These are the first results we know of showing that maternal warmth can affect the health and wellbeing of kids years later by influencing how they think about the social world,” said Dr. George Slavich, senior author of the study and Director of the Laboratory for Stress Assessment and Research at UCLA. “That is a powerful message, because although early-life circumstances are not always easy to change, we can help youth view others and their future in a more positive light,” said Slavich.

Alley said the fact that maternal warmth was found to more strongly affect adolescent health than maternal harshness was important because it has implications for how to best intervene. Based on the study findings, for example, enhancing a teenager’s sense of safety, by way of a public health campaign or intervention, may be more effective than focusing on reducing perceptions of harshness, and it can potentially have a positive impact on health outcomes for years to come, even after poor maternal care has been experienced.

“The findings tell the story of resilience. Namely, it's not just about stopping the negative things like poor care but about putting effort toward enhancing the positives like warmth and safety,” Alley said. “It also important to know that people who have experienced poor care during childhood are not doomed; if we focus on their perceptions of the world, we can greatly improve their lives.”

“The message is clear,” said Slavich. “Perceiving the social world as a socially safe, inclusive place to be really matters for physical and mental health, and this knowledge can be used to develop better interventions and public health campaigns designed to enhance resilience across the lifespan.”

Additional studies are needed to determine how maternal warmth affects children in other contexts outside the United Kingdom, as well as how health care providers and policymakers may improve perceptions of social safety to enhance youth health outcomes.

The study was co-authored by Drs. Jenna Alley, Summer Mengelkoch and George Slavich of UCLA, and Dr. Dimitris Tsomokos of the University College London.

Funding

Funding for the work was provided by grant #OPR21101 from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research/California Initiative to Advance Precision Medicine (Jenna Alley, Summer Mengelkoch, and George Slavich) and the Alphablocks Nursery School (Dimitris Tsomokos). The findings and conclusions in the article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of these organizations, which had no role in designing or planning this study; in collecting, analyzing, or interpreting the data; in writing the article; or in deciding to submit the article for publication.

 

Cardiorespiratory effects of wildfire smoke particles can persist for months, even after a fire has ended



Exposure to lingering fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was associated with increased hospitalization risks for most cardiorespiratory diseases



The Mount Sinai Hospital / Mount Sinai School of Medicine






New York, NY — (May 28, 2025) —Being exposed to lingering fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from wildfire smoke can have health effects up to three months afterwards, well beyond the couple of days that previous studies have identified, and the exposure can occur even after the fires have ended.

These findings were reported in a new study in Epidemiology published on Wednesday, May 28, by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

This medium-term exposure to PM2.5 from wildfire smoke was associated with increased risks for various cardiorespiratory conditions, including ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, arrhythmia, hypertension, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma.

PM2.5 is a mixture of tiny particles and a major component of wildfire smoke. Compared to non-smoke PM2.5, smoke PM2.5 is smaller in size and is considered more dangerous because it is richer in carbonaceous compounds, which are more likely to induce oxidative stress and inflammation and thus pose a greater threat to public health.

The study also showed larger effects in neighborhoods with more vegetation or more disadvantages (e.g., lower education, more unemployment, lower housing quality, and higher poverty), as well as among people who have smoked at any point in their life.

This is the first study to examine the medium-term health effects of wildfire smoke. It is also the first to comprehensively assess its impact on all major types of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

“Wildfire activity in the United States has increased substantially over the past few decades, resulting in an increase in emissions that have begun to reverse decades of air quality improvements,” said Yaguang Wei, PhD, Assistant Professor of Environmental Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine. “Even brief exposures from smaller fires that last only a few days can lead to long-lasting health effects. There is an urgent need for research to fully understand the health impacts of wildfire smoke to raise awareness among public and health professionals, as well as to support the development of effective regulations to mitigate the impacts.” Dr. Wei is also a Department Associate in the Department of Environmental Health at Harvard Chan School.

In total, 13,755,951 hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases and 7,990,910 for respiratory diseases were recorded among residents of all ages across the 15 U.S. states (Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and Wisconsin). They were linked across time and location, using residential addresses, to smoke PM2.5 exposures between 2006 and 2016. Among the conditions studied, hypertension showed the greatest increase in hospitalization risk associated with smoke PM2.5 exposure.

The team developed and employed a novel self-controlled design within a cohort framework to mimic a quasi-experimental study. Under a cohort framework, researchers did not randomly assign participants to different smoke exposure levels; rather, they tracked a participant’s health and smoke exposure over the defined time period, which can introduce bias due to unmeasured confounders. This self-controlled design automatically addresses factors that don’t change or change slowly over time—like genetics—even if they aren’t measured, because each person is compared to themselves. This self-matching format improves the reliability of study findings.

“Wildfires can burn for weeks to a month, and smoke PM2.5 may linger in the air for extended periods, which may keep the air toxic even after a wildfire has ended,” said Dr. Wei, corresponding and first author on this research. “Current wildfire strategies are outdated and ineffective. For example, prescribed fires can reduce wildfire risk but are mainly used to protect property rather than public health. Greater effort should be placed on wildfire management rather than relying solely on traditional air quality control strategies in response to the increasing wildfire activity.”

“As wildfires become more frequent and intense, and their burden on human health becomes clearer, addressing the health impacts is a critical public health priority,” said Rosalind J. Wright, MD, MPH, Dean for Public Health and Chair of the Department of Public Health. “The public and clinicians should take preventive measures during and after wildfires, such as wearing masks and using high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, which are becoming more affordable. Findings from this study underscore the need to continue such preventive measure for a prolonged period after the fires have ended. Collaborative efforts across federal, state, and local levels are essential to safeguard the health of communities nationwide.” Dr. Wright is also the Horace W. Goldsmith Professor in Life Course Health Research in the Departments of Public Health, and Environmental Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Co-Director of the Institute for Exposomic Research; and Director of Conduits, the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program at Mount Sinai. 

This study was funded by the National Institute of Health grants P30ES023515, UL1TR004419, R01ES032418, and P30ES000002.

Link to paper: “Medium-term exposure to wildfire smoke PM2.5 and cardiorespiratory hospitalization risks.”

###

 

About the Mount Sinai Health System

Mount Sinai Health System is one of the largest academic medical systems in the New York metro area, with 48,000 employees working across seven hospitals, more than 400 outpatient practices, more than 600 research and clinical labs, a school of nursing, and a leading school of medicine and graduate education. Mount Sinai advances health for all people, everywhere, by taking on the most complex health care challenges of our time—discovering and applying new scientific learning and knowledge; developing safer, more effective treatments; educating the next generation of medical leaders and innovators; and supporting local communities by delivering high-quality care to all who need it.

Through the integration of its hospitals, labs, and schools, Mount Sinai offers comprehensive health care solutions from birth through geriatrics, leveraging innovative approaches such as artificial intelligence and informatics while keeping patients’ medical and emotional needs at the center of all treatment. The Health System includes approximately 9,000 primary and specialty care physicians and 11 free-standing joint-venture centers throughout the five boroughs of New York City, Westchester, Long Island, and Florida. Hospitals within the System are consistently ranked by Newsweek’s® “The World’s Best Smart Hospitals, Best in State Hospitals, World Best Hospitals and Best Specialty Hospitals” and by U.S. News & World Report's® “Best Hospitals” and “Best Children’s Hospitals.” The Mount Sinai Hospital is on the U.S. News & World Report® “Best Hospitals” Honor Roll for 2024-2025. 

For more information, visit https://www.mountsinai.org or find Mount Sinai on FacebookInstagramLinkedInX, and YouTube.

 

About Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health is a community of innovative scientists, practitioners, educators, and students dedicated to improving health and advancing equity so all people can thrive. We research the many factors influencing health and collaborate widely to translate those insights into policies, programs, and practices that prevent disease and promote well-being for people around the world. We also educate thousands of public health leaders a year through our degree programs, postdoctoral training, fellowships, and continuing education courses. Founded in 1913 as America’s first professional training program in public health, the School continues to have an extraordinary impact in fields ranging from infectious disease to environmental justice to health systems and beyond

 

Cracks in the fireline: Report exposes gaps in U.S. wildfire response





Stanford University





As wildfire seasons grow longer, hotter, and more destructive, the demands placed on firefighters have intensified. Who among them gets counted when policymakers consider support and reform? A new white paper from the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment’s Climate and Energy Policy Program reveals that a lack of available data on this broad workforce made up of federal, Tribal, state, local, and private firefighters, has hindered agency capacity to respond to wildfires and care for those on the front lines.

“There’s no one system that tracks each individual participating in wildfire response across agencies,” said co-author Abigail Varney, a wildland fire fellow at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability and a federal wildland firefighter. “This makes it more difficult to ensure that the systems used to coordinate wildfire response efforts are effectively utilizing resources and properly accounting for the diverse needs of wildfire response personnel.”

The report helps address this challenge by providing better data on the wildfire response workforce, including the number of personnel contributing to fire response efforts and recent trends.

Through interviews, public data, and cross-agency comparison, the researchers found that state and local fire departments account for the largest portion of the workforce with at least 100,000 personnel, and likely many more. Federal agencies employ more than 40,000 people involved with wildfire response, including staff in support roles. Around 15,000 firefighters work for private contractors and 1,500 work for Tribal programs. The U.S. Forest Service and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection are the two largest employers of firefighters. This assessment is the most inclusive and comprehensive of its kind, according to the researchers.

============================================

The report highlights several underrecognized sectors:

  • Tribal fire programs, many of which are operated independently through federal compacts, employ nearly 1,000 primary firefighters. Yet until recently, they were excluded from federal firefighter pay raises.
  • Volunteer firefighters, who make up about 65% of the local fire service, are essential to rural fire response but may struggle to participate in the national fire response system due to bureaucratic hurdles, such as slow reimbursement processes. 
  • Private contractors, who provide a growing share of crews, aircraft, and equipment on large incidents,  rely more heavily on immigrant or undocumented workers—including H-2B visa holders—who may face limited workplace protections.

============================================

Many wildfire responders, including volunteers, seasonal hires, collateral-duty staff, and incarcerated or immigrant laborers, often go uncounted in official data. As a result, their contributions are less visible to the public, news media, and policymakers. This means they can be overlooked when it comes to support such as better compensation and benefits.

“Failing to account for and integrate these groups within the fire response system reduces the available resource pool to respond to wildfires,” said co-author Avery Bick, an academic fellow in the Environmental & Natural Resources Law & Policy Program at the Stanford Law School. “It also perpetuates inequities in how we value and support different segments of the workforce.”

“Understanding the full makeup of the fire response system is the first step to making it safer, more effective, and more equitable,” said Michael Mastrandrea, research director at the Climate and Energy Policy Program.

The authors argue for better data collection across all levels of the workforce and policy reforms that reflect the evolving structure of fire response in the U.S. They also recommend targeted support for historically undercounted and underrecognized groups who play increasingly important roles in wildfire response. The findings build on earlier work by the Stanford team addressing recruitment, retention, and equity in federal wildfire jobs.

As wildfires grow more severe and costly, a more inclusive approach to workforce planning, training, and compensation could mean the difference between a well-coordinated, rapid response—or a dangerously delayed one.

This research was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. Co-authors also include Cassandra Jurenci, and Michael Wara of the Stanford Climate and Energy Policy Program; and Erin J. Belval of the USDA Forest Service.