Emma Gatten
Sat, December 11, 2021
Cows eating in a cow shed - Alamy
A cattle shed that collects methane from cows and uses their waste to grow fruit and vegetables has been given government backing in the fight to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The so-called GreenShed will look much like normal housing used to keep cattle inside over winter, but will be more airtight and include extraction technology to remove the methane and burn it onsite.
Methane is a greenhouse gas 28 times more potent than carbon dioxide and has a powerful short-term impact. Methane from livestock accounts for around six per cent of the UK’s overall greenhouse gas emissions.
The Government is relying on technological solutions to cut significant amounts of methane from livestock farming, rather than focusing on changing diets to encourage less meat eating.
Energy needed for the GreenShed will be provided in part by burning the waste produced by the cows in an anaerobic digestor attached to the shed.
The heat produced from that process will also be used in polytunnels that help crops to grow in a vertical farming system.
The project is being led by researchers at Scotland's Rural College, and is one of dozens to receive Government-backing from a fund to develop direct air capture of greenhouse gas emissions.
“Tackling methane really offers us a lot of opportunity,” said Carole-Anne Duthie, the head of SRUC's Beef and Sheep Research Centre. “Because it’s got such a short halflife, it can have a massive impact.”
Other inventions include 'burp-catching' mask
Other recent inventions to tackle livestock methane include a mask that catches their burps, and the addition of seaweed into their diet, which has been shown to reduce the gas by up to 80 per cent.
The GreenShed researchers hope the technology will be ready in the next three to four years, and could provide a simple retrofit solution on farms where cattle are already kept inside over winter.
It will target cows during the final “finishing” months before they are sent for slaughter, when their methane emissions are highest.
The system is expected to add 10-30p for the farmer on the cost of producing a kilo of beef, at a time when they are facing increasing pressure on price.
The researchers are relying on a growing desire in consumers for food produced in a greener way, and a willingness to pay for it.
Although the project estimates it can cut up to 250 tonnes of CO2 equivalent gas from every cattle shed per year, it will not solve the problem of emissions from agriculture.
Burning the methane will produce CO2, while the shed cannot tackle the emissions produced during the rest of the cattle’s life. There are also concerns that the feed given to cattles kept indoors is produced in areas that contribute to deforestation.
Instead, increasing numbers of environmentally minded farmers are focusing on a regenerative agriculture system, in which hardy breeds of cattle are kept outside all year long, in a boost to their welfare and to soil health and its ability to store carbon.
“We need to tackle the climate and biodiversity crisis to have livestock outside and deliver the true benefits of a regenerative farming system,” said Martin Lines, the chair of the Nature Friendly Farming Network. “My concern is this research will encourage the keeping of animals inside. We should be doing more to treat those animals as sentient beings.”
But its backers argue that the technology could provide a relatively simple way to reduce the emissions from cattle.
“It’s one of many in our potential toolkit to help solve the problem,” Ms Duthie said. “The key benefit is that you’re not asking for radical changes to how those farms are going to operate.
“The responses from farmers so far are really quite enthusiastic.”
Carbon Capture Innovations Will Play A Key Role In Net-Zero Ambitions
Editor OilPrice.com
Sat, December 11, 2021
Following several announcements over the past year from oil majors investing heavily in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, it appears progress has been made. Several governments and oil firms are working together to come up with various carbon capture solutions, from burying CO2 underground to pumping it into rocks. With the big players working together, this could be the mid-term answer to net-zero emissions the world’s been looking for.
In the U.K. this week, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) advised the country that the use of the reservoirs under the North Sea for CCS would be most effective, as the technologies get up and running in the region. However, reusing existing onshore wells could also provide an inexpensive and simple means for storing carbon, without having to create new structures or look for alternative land. With operations already taking place in the North Sea, feasibility studies and the development of sites would be relatively simple.
Net Zero Rise (Research Infrastructure for Subsurface Energy), a group of researchers from universities and oil companies, has recommended 20 candidate oil wells across the Midlands and Yorkshire to bury the initial CO2 loads, around 1,000 tonnes at each site. The repurposing of one well and the construction of two wells with monitoring equipment is expected to cost around $6.6 million. This follows similar tests currently taking place in the U.S. Canada and Australia.
By exploring both onshore and offshore options the U.K. could avoid wasting these wells once they become abandoned as they get filled in. Richard Davies, at the University of Newcastle explained, “These assets are already there, while drilling [new] boreholes is very expensive and adds a certain amount of risk. The range of boreholes we have will also give opportunities to test different rock types.”
There are several different approaches to CCS and as supermajors invest more heavily over the next decade we will begin to see which is most effective. Currently in the Midwest of the U.S. studies are taking place to understand the potential for pumping carbon waste into rock formations. There are two proposals for multiple pipelines in Illinois and North Dakota, which, if approved, would transport carbon dioxide from ethanol plants to rocks located across the states.
The CO2 would be stored by injecting it in the rocks to be pumped down into wells and then stored in large caverns in the rock sites. Summit Carbon Solutions from Iowa and Navigator CO2 Ventures from Texas are the companies behind the proposals, following the study of the area as a potential carbon storage option for two decades. Summit’s ‘Midwest Carbon Express pipeline’ would be the biggest of its type in the world if achieved, and would also support methane capture in the region.
A controversial idea that keeps coming up is the burying of CO2 in the world’s sea-beds. Researchers are studying the potential for pipelines to carry carbon to aquifers under sea-beds to be stored for thousands of years, if not forever. However, testing has been particularly difficult due to the hard-to-reach location and understanding of the area’s properties.
Recent innovations have meant that scientists can finally study the interaction between carbon dioxide and salty aquifer water, recreating saline solutions under conditions of pressure and temperatures similar to that of the proposed ocean areas. They believe this could provide a carbon storage solution that doesn’t lead to secondary repercussions seen in other technologies.
In Australia, the government announced in November that the country’s first CCS hub will be operational by 2024. Santos and Beach Energy are developing a joint project in Moomba, South Australia with the hopes of reducing emissions from gas production in the area by 70 percent. At a cost of $157.3 million, this marks the first CCS project to fall under the Government’s Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF).
Santos plans to use the Bayu-Undan facilities in Timor-Leste to securely store up to 10 million tonnes of CO2per year. It is part of a government plan to continue producing liquefied natural gas (LNG) to meet global energy needs as plans go ahead to curb coal and oil output. LNG is seen by many governments and oil firms as a necessary fuel to bridge the gap between other more polluting fossil fuels and renewable alternatives, employing CCS technologies to reduce the emissions output from production.
The race is on to see who can come up with the technology needed to extract and store carbon dioxide in the most efficient and sustainable way. Whether pumping it into giant rocks, keeping it underground, or finding a safe way to inject it into aquifers under the sea bed, CCS appears to be here to stay, as part of an international strategy to reach net-zero.
By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com
Editor OilPrice.com
Sat, December 11, 2021
Following several announcements over the past year from oil majors investing heavily in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, it appears progress has been made. Several governments and oil firms are working together to come up with various carbon capture solutions, from burying CO2 underground to pumping it into rocks. With the big players working together, this could be the mid-term answer to net-zero emissions the world’s been looking for.
In the U.K. this week, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) advised the country that the use of the reservoirs under the North Sea for CCS would be most effective, as the technologies get up and running in the region. However, reusing existing onshore wells could also provide an inexpensive and simple means for storing carbon, without having to create new structures or look for alternative land. With operations already taking place in the North Sea, feasibility studies and the development of sites would be relatively simple.
Net Zero Rise (Research Infrastructure for Subsurface Energy), a group of researchers from universities and oil companies, has recommended 20 candidate oil wells across the Midlands and Yorkshire to bury the initial CO2 loads, around 1,000 tonnes at each site. The repurposing of one well and the construction of two wells with monitoring equipment is expected to cost around $6.6 million. This follows similar tests currently taking place in the U.S. Canada and Australia.
By exploring both onshore and offshore options the U.K. could avoid wasting these wells once they become abandoned as they get filled in. Richard Davies, at the University of Newcastle explained, “These assets are already there, while drilling [new] boreholes is very expensive and adds a certain amount of risk. The range of boreholes we have will also give opportunities to test different rock types.”
There are several different approaches to CCS and as supermajors invest more heavily over the next decade we will begin to see which is most effective. Currently in the Midwest of the U.S. studies are taking place to understand the potential for pumping carbon waste into rock formations. There are two proposals for multiple pipelines in Illinois and North Dakota, which, if approved, would transport carbon dioxide from ethanol plants to rocks located across the states.
The CO2 would be stored by injecting it in the rocks to be pumped down into wells and then stored in large caverns in the rock sites. Summit Carbon Solutions from Iowa and Navigator CO2 Ventures from Texas are the companies behind the proposals, following the study of the area as a potential carbon storage option for two decades. Summit’s ‘Midwest Carbon Express pipeline’ would be the biggest of its type in the world if achieved, and would also support methane capture in the region.
A controversial idea that keeps coming up is the burying of CO2 in the world’s sea-beds. Researchers are studying the potential for pipelines to carry carbon to aquifers under sea-beds to be stored for thousands of years, if not forever. However, testing has been particularly difficult due to the hard-to-reach location and understanding of the area’s properties.
Recent innovations have meant that scientists can finally study the interaction between carbon dioxide and salty aquifer water, recreating saline solutions under conditions of pressure and temperatures similar to that of the proposed ocean areas. They believe this could provide a carbon storage solution that doesn’t lead to secondary repercussions seen in other technologies.
In Australia, the government announced in November that the country’s first CCS hub will be operational by 2024. Santos and Beach Energy are developing a joint project in Moomba, South Australia with the hopes of reducing emissions from gas production in the area by 70 percent. At a cost of $157.3 million, this marks the first CCS project to fall under the Government’s Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF).
Santos plans to use the Bayu-Undan facilities in Timor-Leste to securely store up to 10 million tonnes of CO2per year. It is part of a government plan to continue producing liquefied natural gas (LNG) to meet global energy needs as plans go ahead to curb coal and oil output. LNG is seen by many governments and oil firms as a necessary fuel to bridge the gap between other more polluting fossil fuels and renewable alternatives, employing CCS technologies to reduce the emissions output from production.
The race is on to see who can come up with the technology needed to extract and store carbon dioxide in the most efficient and sustainable way. Whether pumping it into giant rocks, keeping it underground, or finding a safe way to inject it into aquifers under the sea bed, CCS appears to be here to stay, as part of an international strategy to reach net-zero.
By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com
No comments:
Post a Comment