Saturday, June 07, 2025

After slow divestment, Canada’s Scotiabank quietly reinvests in Israel’s genocide

For almost two years, activists across Canada have been demanding that Scotiabank divest from Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems. Despite a commitment to 'incremental divestment', the bank has slowly been reinvesting in Elbit.
 June 7, 2025 
MONDOWEISS

Palestine solidarity activists in Vancouver Canada hold a rally outside the Scotiabank Towers to protest the bank’s investment in Elbit Systems
(Photo: Michael YC Tseng)

For almost two years, activists in Vancouver and across Canada have been out on the streets demanding that Scotiabank divest completely from Israeli company Elbit Systems. Many sectors became involved in the campaign, from solidarity groups to artists, all to demand an end to this unholy alliance of a big bank with an Israeli arms company actively fueling genocide.

It’s been a roller-coast ride of two steps forward, one step back. Two years ago, Scotiabank’s 1832 Asset Management Fund owned 5% of Elbit Systems worth almost $500 million US. Since then, it gradually divested much of its shares and at the end of September 2024, it was down to just $118 million.

Like many others, I was encouraged by the strong response from the public, most of whom were horrified when they learnt that their mutual funds or retirement savings might directly be helping to kill Palestinians. There were flash sit-ins inside bank branches, multiple national Days of Action and a highly visible campaign from the arts community that even resulted in the Giller Prize finally dissociating itself from Scotiabank in February 2025.

Their ‘incremental divestment’ was less dramatic than a complete withdrawal of funding all at one time and allowed the bank to even pretend that their decision was based on ‘investment merit’. This strategy, coupled with the Giller Prize victory, eventually led to less public focus on Scotiabank’s complicity with genocide and war crimes in recent months.

However, as soon as Scotiabank felt they were no longer under constant scrutiny, they reversed course and started to quietly reinvest in Elbit. As noted by Canada Palestine Association/CPA in a May 9, 2025 statement: “…the last quarter of 2024 brought the news of a shift in their strategy, as they grabbed more Elbit stock which was valued at the time of reporting to be worth $180 million US. However, Elbit share prices have been on an upward trajectory since late January of this year…”

In fact, 1832 Asset Management’s latest filing for the first quarter of 2025 showed that their Elbit shares were worth $268 million US. This amount actually exceeded the dollar amount of their investment a year ago. Although Elbit stocks are currently dropping, their stock price is still almost double what it was in May of 2024.

The CPA statement went on to conclude: “Although their partial divestments were noteworthy, this simply proves that we can never have faith in multinational corporations to do the ethical thing. War, death and destruction are good for the bottom line! And even though the protests temporarily affected that bottom line, Scotiabank was able to navigate its way out of the public eye…”


Divest the Rest!

But Canadian activists are refusing to be discouraged by this and are regrouping to push the campaign forward with increased momentum. The new website SBFundsGenocide.ca is actively working towards a new day of action on June 14 and are hoping to target as many branches as possible all on the same day. They also just held a nation-wide webinar on May 21 to explain the history of Scotiabank’s complicity, its ups and downs and what needs to happen now.

Rachel Small, Canada organizer for WorldBeyondWar, noted:

“It’s despicable for a Canadian bank to be one of the top global funders of Elbit, Israel’s largest weapons company, and the producer of an enormous share of the arms being used in Israel’s genocide, from bombs and drones to chemical weapons and ammunition…Time has run out. We are witnessing genocide and our institutions are profiting off of it. We will be making sure that Scotiabank knows that we will not stand for Canadian funds being used to generate profit for war mongers. On June 14th we expect to see Scotiabank branches flooded with people from coast to coast.”

Elbit management was quick to brag when releasing its 2024 results that: “The Company has secured significant contracts worldwide, with its advanced technologies achieving major successes and milestones alongside investments in R&D and production infrastructure.”

However, their financial reports have also noted that “some of Elbit’s operations have experienced disruptions due to supply chain and operational constraints… increase in transportation costs and delays due to factors such as the Houthi movement attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, material and component shortages, limitations imposed by some countries on exports to Israel and attacks on some of Elbit’s global facilities by anti-Israeli organizations.”

Palestine Action in the UK has shown all of us the way forward with their longevity and consistent direct-action campaigns, no matter the partial victories or the personal costs to their members. Despite arrests, imprisonment and other repressive measures, they have demonstrated that long-term persistence produces results. When we demand complete divestment, we must be ready to fight for that no matter the tactics from Elbit and its investors and no matter how long it takes.
Iran obtains 'sensitive' Israeli intelligence on defence, nuclear facilities

Iran said it has uncovered ' sensitive documents, images, and videos' relating to Israeli's nuclear facilities and defence plans.

The New Arab Staff & Agencies
07 June, 2025


Iran and Israel have been regional foes over the decades, with attacks i the backdrop of the war in Gaza the latest source of tension between the two [Getty/file photo]


Iranian state television reported on Saturday that Tehran had obtained a trove of "strategic and sensitive" Israeli intelligence, including files related to Israel's nuclear facilities and defence plans.

"Iran's intelligence apparatus has obtained a vast quantity of strategic and sensitive information and documents belonging to the Zionist regime (Israel)," the state broadcaster said, citing informed regional sources.

The report did not include any details on the documents or how Iran had obtained them.

The intelligence reportedly included "thousands of documents related to that regime's nuclear plans and facilities," it added.

Iranian intelligence agencies and other state media did not immediately comment on the report.

According to state television, "the data haul was extracted during a covert operation," and included a "vast volume of materials - including documents, images, and videos".

The report said the data was thoroughly reviewed by Iranian authorities after being securely transferred to the country.

Iran and Israel have waged a years-long campaign of covert and overt operations against each other, ranging from cyberattacks and assassinations to drone strikes and acts of sabotage.

Tehran accuses Israel of orchestrating the killings of several of its nuclear scientists, while Israel has blamed Iran for supporting militant groups across the region and targeting Israeli interests abroad.

Western countries, led by the United States and Israel, Iran's sworn enemy and considered by experts to be the only nuclear power in the Middle East, accuse Tehran of wanting to acquire nuclear weapons.

Iran denies having such military ambitions but insists on its right to civilian nuclear power under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which it is a signatory.

The report comes amid ongoing tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear programme, on which Tehran has held several Iran-US discussions.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has consistently expressed support for bombing Iran's nuclear infrastructure.

Last year, tensions between the two foes reached an all-time high as they exchanged direct fire amid Israel's ongoing war in Gaza.

Iran, which has made support for the Palestinian cause a key tenet of its foreign policy since the 1979 revolution, does not recognise Israel.
Opinion

Netanyahu’s latest gamble: A ‘Third-Force’ headed by a criminal gang leader



Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends his trial on corruption charges at the district court in Tel Aviv, on April 21, 2025. [Moti KIMCHI / POOL / AFP / Getty Images]

by Iqbal Jassat
ijassat
June 6, 2025 
MEMO


The genie is now out of the bottle, despite Benjamin Netanyahu’s vain efforts to suppress news of his devious third-force created to counter the Palestinian resistance. Sooner or later, his “bad changes” will return to haunt him.

War criminals especially of the Netanyahu-type who morbidly celebrate their gruesome massacres and destruction of Palestinian lives in Gaza, have obviously much to learn about the rebounding effect of third-forces.

A quick glance at South Africa’s apartheid history and the despicable role of counter-revolutionaries to disrupt, fracture and fragment the liberation movements, provide many crucial lessons.

The period between the early 1980s and late 1990s saw clandestine operations in what the world came to learn were the apartheid regime’s third-force hit-squads responsible for unleashing murder, targeted assassinations, violence and mayhem.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) found that while little evidence existed of a centrally directed, coherent or formally constituted ‘Third Force’, “a network of security and ex-security force operatives, frequently acting in conjunction with right-wing elements and/or sectors of the IFP, was involved in actions that could be construed as fomenting violence and which resulted in gross human rights violations, including random and target killings”.

READ: Grandmother of French children killed in Gaza files genocide complaint against Israel

Allegations of security force involvement in the violence reached a climax with the Boipatong massacre on 17 June,1992. A few months later during a Goldstone raid on the offices of the Apartheid-era’s Directorate of Covert Collections (DCC), evidence emerged of security force involvement in illegal activities.

During that same period, the Weekly Mail reported that two “young gangsters give an horrific account of how they were encouraged, equipped and trained to carry out violence against ANC-linked targets by the security forces”.

It said their account provided a “crucial missing piece in the jigsaw puzzle of what caused the violence” which rocked the townships. Both young men were interviewed separately, at length, and their accounts confirmed evidence provided by other sources.

Now that reports have emerged of Israel’s scandalous third-force operatives in Gaza, it has landed the Netanyahu regime in hot water, amidst growing international disgust against its so-called “War on Hamas”.

Having failed to suppress information about his devious clandestine involvement in setting up and equipping a criminal gang and being forced to finally admit to it, Netanyahu faces immense domestic pressure as well.

The anti-resistance gang is led by a known criminal, Yasser Abu Shabab. Details in Israeli media reveal that the Netanyahu regime has provided him with military weapons as well as protection to operate in Rafah and other areas under Israel’s military control.

Opposition head Yair Lapid slammed Netanyahu following revelations that he authorised the arming of Abu Shabab whom he linked to ISIS.

Also, former defence minister, Avigdor Liberman, who heads the opposition Yisrael Beytenu Party, took a harshly critical stance when he told the Kan public broadcaster that Netanyahu had unilaterally approved the transfer of weapons to Abu Shabab.

READ: From Al-Aqsa to Gaza’s ruins: Palestinians observe Eid amid war, Israeli occupation

As for the crime of using starvation as a weapon of war, Abu Shabab has been implicated in acts of looting humanitarian aid under Israeli command and military protection.

In recent days, his gang has been documented operating in an area near the Kerem Shalom border crossing under Israeli military control.

In footage, which was published online by Abu Shabab, members of the group can be seen wearing military-style uniforms with the Palestinian flag and the words “Counter-Terrorism Mechanism” emblazoned on them.

Being aware of Netanyahu’s dirty tricks to foment third-force crimes, Hamas published an official video on 30 May showing a group of armed, masked men operating outside a building before being blown up.

According to media reports, Hamas claimed the group in the video was working with the IDF to inspect buildings before Israeli troops moved in.

In his rationale for resorting to South Africa’s discredited third-force type deployment, Netanyahu made a point of stressing that it was “to advance opposition to the resistance”.

“We made use of clans in Gaza that are opposed to Hamas… What’s wrong with that?” he asked. “It’s only good. It saves the lives of IDF soldiers.”

Abu Shabab, a clan leader from Rafah is the person used by Netanyahu to head a militia

under Israeli protection to “save IDF soldiers” in direct defiance of Hamas.

Once a known figure in Gaza’s criminal underworld, with alleged links to drug trafficking, Abu Shabab has been dismissed by Hamas as “a tool used by the Israeli occupation to fragment the Palestinian internal front,” while many others regard him an outright collaborator.

While Netanyahu seeks to downplay his deceptive role knowing that it is likely to bite him, major news outlets including: Al Jazeera, CNN, Haaretz and The Washington Post among others, are reporting that Abu Shabab’s group operates under full Israeli military protection.

Witnesses say they have seen his fighters looting convoys and demanding “protection money” from drivers, all while Israeli tanks watch without interference.

As scandal upon scandal rocks the Zionist regime, and global public opinion turns against it, its image as a demonic genocidal state has gained supremacy, now compounded by the emergence of a third-force gang.

OPINION: Israeli lies and western complicity: How deceit became a weapon of war

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.


Netanyahu admits Israel arming Gaza criminal gangs stealing aid

Israeli and Palestinian media have reported that the group Israel has been working with is part of a local Bedouin tribe led by Yasser Abu Shabab.



The New Arab Staff & Agencies
06 June, 2025


Netanyahu admitted that Israel has 'activated' the criminal gangs in Gaza [Getty]

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted that Israel is supporting an armed gang in Gaza linked to raids on aid stores, following comments by a former minister that Israel had transferred weapons to it.

Israeli and Palestinian media have reported that the group Israel has been working with is part of a local Bedouin tribe led by Yasser Abu Shabab.

The European Council on Foreign Relations (EFCR) think tank describes Abu Shabab as the leader of a "criminal gang operating in the Rafah area that is widely accused of looting aid trucks".

Knesset member and ex-defence minister Avigdor Liberman had told the Kan public broadcaster that the government, at Netanyahu's direction, was "giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons".

"What did Liberman leak? That security sources activated a clan in Gaza that opposes Hamas? What is bad about that?" Netanyahu said in a video posted to social media on Thursday.

"It is only good, it is saving lives of Israeli soldiers."

Michael Milshtein, an expert on Palestinian affairs at the Moshe Dayan Center in Tel Aviv, told AFP that the Abu Shabab clan was part of a Bedouin tribe that spans across the border between Gaza and Egypt's Sinai peninsula.

Some of the tribe's members, he said, were involved in "all kinds of criminal activities, drug smuggling, and things like that".

'Gangster'

Milshtein said that Abu Shabab had spent time in prison in Gaza and that his clan chiefs had recently denounced him as an Israeli "collaborator and a gangster".

"It seems that actually the Shabak (Israeli security agency) or the (military) thought it was a wonderful idea to turn this militia, gang actually, into a proxy, to give them weapons and money and shelter" from army operations, Milshtein said.

He added that Hamas killed four members of the gang days ago.

The ECFR said Abu Shabab was "reported to have been previously jailed by Hamas for drug smuggling. His brother is said to have been killed by Hamas during a crackdown against the group's attacks on UN aid convoys."

Israel regularly accuses Hamas, with which it has been at war for nearly 20 months, of looting aid convoys in Gaza.

Hamas said the group had "chosen betrayal and theft as their path" and called on civilians to oppose them.

Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades, said it had evidence of "clear coordination between these looting gangs, collaborators with the occupation (Israel), and the enemy army itself in the looting of aid and the fabrication of humanitarian crises that deepen the suffering of" Palestinians.

The Popular Forces, as Abu Shabab's group calls itself, said on Facebook it had "never been, and will never be, a tool of the occupation".

"Our weapons are simple, outdated, and came through the support of our own people," it added.

Milshtein called Israel's decision to arm a group such as Abu Shabab "a fantasy, not something that you can really describe as a strategy".

"I really hope it will not end with catastrophe," he said.


Inside the Hamas unit fighting Israeli-armed gangs that loot aid and facilitate displacement in Gaza

Netanyahu admits Israel is arming gangs and clan members in Gaza to counter Hamas's influence, and new evidence shows Israel is using them to loot aid and implement its displacement plan. In response, the Hamas government set up the “Arrow Unit.”


LONG READ
 June 6, 2025 
MONDOWEISS

Palestinian Hamas police officers begin working to maintain security and order during the ceasefire with Israel, Gaza City, January 20, 2025. (Photo: Hadi Daoud/APA Images)


The Israeli military is arming gangs to combat Hamas in Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed on Thursday. The revelation comes to light after right-wing Israeli lawmaker Avigdor Lieberman accused Netanyahu on Israeli public broadcaster Kan yesterday of arming a gang of hundreds of men in Rafah as a counterweight to Hamas influence in the Strip. The Prime Minister’s office responded by saying that it was combating the Palestinian resistance group “in various ways, on the recommendation of all heads of the security establishment.”

Later, Netanyahu officially confirmed the reports in a video posted on X. “On the advice of security officials, we activated clans in Gaza that oppose Hamas,” the Israeli Prime Minister said. “What’s wrong with that? It only saves the lives of Israeli soldiers.”

“Publishing this only benefits Hamas, but Lieberman doesn’t care,” Netanyahu added.

Among these groups is an armed gang led by a man named Yasser Abu Shabab, a thief and drug trafficker from Rafah who led groups of hundreds of armed men in looting aid convoys during the latter half of 2024. Descended from the influential Bedouin Tarabin clan, which spans southern Gaza, the Sinai, and the Naqab Desert, Abu Shabab has been described by Israeli media outlets as “linked to ISIS,” likely due to Abu Shabab’s involvement in drug trafficking networks between Gaza and the Sinai in which ISIS has been implicated.

Now, Israel openly admits to backing and arming Abu Shabab’s group, which in effect is an open admission that it has been backing the looting of food aid meant for Gaza’s starving population.

This policy comes in the wake of a systematic Israeli campaign of assassinating the Hamas government’s civil servants to cause social collapse in Gaza and foment chaos and lawlessness in the Strip. The Israeli army has been deliberately targeting Interior Ministry bureaucrats, the police force, and the security services to create a vacuum that is then filled by armed looters like Abu Shabab’s group, as recently reported by Mondoweiss.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich directly admitted to this policy last month, boasting that “we’re eliminating ministers, bureaucrats, money handlers — everyone who holds up Hamas’ civilian rule.”

Hamas has been attempting to combat this Israeli policy since late 2024, when the Interior Ministry in Gaza first formed a special unit of plainclothed police officers and volunteers who were tasked with hunting down looters and attempting to restore order to Gaza’s streets. The Hamas unit, which calls itself “the Arrow Unit” or “the Arrow Force,” was reactivated during the resumption of hostilities between Israel and Hamas after the collapse of the ceasefire in mid-March.

Mondoweiss spoke to several members of the Arrow Unit, in addition to a high-level security source in the resistance, who detailed Hamas’s continuing efforts to combat Israel’s armed proxy groups in the Strip. Mondoweiss also spoke to the heads of several clans in Gaza regarding Israel’s attempts to exploit the security vacuum it created by backing clan leaders as an alternative to Hamas rule.

How the Arrow Unit hunts down thieves and collaborators


The Arrow Unit was first formed over a year ago in March 2024, when the phenomenon of looting by armed gangs began to spread throughout Gaza. The unit began as informal groups of young men dressed in black with their faces covered, deploying at chaotic public venues like bakery lines, ATMs, and markets. News reports at the time described them arresting suspected thieves and beating them severely in marketplaces, publicly proclaiming that this was the punishment for looters.

Over the months, the Arrow Force started to show up in their dozens on the streets of Gaza, organizing people into queues in public venues. They seemed to be following a leader who was apparently a police officer.

According to members of the Arrow Unit, lawlessness had become endemic in Gaza after the police were forced underground following Israel’s targeting of its officers who had been tasked with guarding aid convoys. This led to a rapid deterioration of security in Gaza amid soaring prices at markets and the spread of inter-family feuds and “the law of the jungle,” Arrow members said.

Palestinian police take measures set up a checkpoint on al-Rashid Street during the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, January 26. (Photo: Omar Ashtawy/APA Images)

Abu Hadi, a member of the Arrow Unit who is also an officer in the Gaza police force, told Mondoweiss that he decided to join the unit after “witnessing thieves robbing food stores and international kitchens, without concern for the people’s hunger.”

“This aid goes to my family, my neighbors, my relatives. It should not go to one person who steals and resells it on the black market,” Abu Hadi said. “We in the Arrow Force will stop these people.”

Abu Islam, another Arrow member, says the force is comprised of police officers, members of political factions, members of prominent Gaza families, and occasionally, members of Hamas’s armed wing, the Qassam Brigades.

After this new force began operating within the Strip, it was officially announced that the Arrow Unit was an organ of the Ministry of Interior. Abu Muhammad, an official at the Ministry, told Mondoweiss via recorded testimony that the Arrow Unit is authorized to “maintain security within the Gaza Strip, especially during wartime.”

When asked about how the Arrow Unit operates, Abu Muhammad said that it obtains intelligence from the police about suspected thieves and collaborators, and is then dispatched to apprehend them clandestinely.

“The war has taken its toll on the Ministry of Interior, but we make every effort to communicate with police officers and have them track looters down and provide names and evidence,” Abu Muhammad said. “Then teams like the Arrow Unit can apprehend the perpetrators of the crime and reach them secretly, because the occupation is pursuing all police officers, and this restricts the work of the Ministry of Interior.”

Abu Muhammad explains that “if there are proven charges against some thieves and outlaws, they must be punished directly, even by death, to set an example for others and prevent chaos from becoming the norm in Gaza,” clarifying that not every looter caught in Gaza is a collaborator with Israel, but that “their theft is facilitated by the Israeli army.”

“This may become a pathway to following Israeli army directions, which can later develop into open collaboration,” Abu Muhammad explained. “And the occupation can make thieves into collaborators, for instance, by not bombing the places they steal from, and even directing them by phone where to go.”

Abu Islam, an Arrow member in Gaza City responsible for investigating and apprehending thieves, explains how looters and collaborators are punished. “Some are punished by beating, some by killing, and some by imprisonment,” he explains.

According to Abu Islam, “agents proven to have killed or participated in killings are executed,” clarifying that the goal of such harsh punishment is to deter people “from thinking about communicating with the occupation.”

Abu Islam also says he has obtained several confessions from looters who said that they were directed to food warehouses by Israeli officers. “They even give us their names and assignments,” he said. “This is clear evidence that they were infiltrators and agents, receiving direct orders from the Israeli enemy at a specifically assigned time and place.”

A high-level security source in the resistance told Mondoweiss in a written statement that “investigations reveal the Shabak [Israel’s internal intelligence service, or the Shin Bet] is directing some agents to engage in looting and trespassing as a cover for carrying out security operations.” The source goes on to quote the written confession of an alleged collaborator who was told by an Israeli officer to “enter the home of one of the leaders of the resistance through a hole in the wall created by a drone.”

The security source added that one thief was blackmailed by the Shin Bet into spying for them when he used an app operated by the army to secure permission to enter a combat zone. “The Shabak used his criminal record [as blackmail] to recruit him for its purposes,” the source asserted.

The attempts of Arrow members to intervene in these looting operations have led Israeli forces to directly target them in the field, killing “dozens” of personnel, Abu Islam says. On one occasion in late May, he continues, Arrow members went to a food warehouse in Gaza City where thieves were trying to steal aid, but were bombed by an Israeli drone. “When the Arrow Forces arrived, the thieves withdrew, and the Force was targeted,” he explains. “Then, another unit was dispatched to the site to support the Force, but it was bombed by the occupation as well.”

Palestinian police take measures set up a checkpoint on al-Rashid Street during the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, January 26. (Photo: Omar Ashtawy/APA Images)
The Arrow Unit vs. Yasser Abu Shabab

On November 19, 2024, the Arrow Unit conducted its first major operation during the war, attacking a group of looters that had been pillaging aid trucks for several months, mostly in Rafah. The Arrow forces announced that they had killed about 20 members of the gang. The leader of the group was Yasser Abu Shabab.

Abu Hadi says that Hamas first suspected Abu Shabab of collaborating with Israel when he was documented reaching inaccessible areas in Rafah that are under exclusive Israeli military control. “Anyone who reached these zones was killed,” Abu Hadi explains. “This led the Arrow Force to suspect that he had received orders from the Israeli military to prevent the entry of aid to the population.”

As the looting of aid convoys continued throughout late 2024, Abu Shabab’s role became increasingly clear. At the time, an internal UN memo shared with international media outlets had directly named Abu Shabab as “the main and most influential stakeholder behind systematic and massive looting” of aid convoys last year, and that Abu Shabab was likely “benefiting from a passive if not active benevolence,” or “protection,” by the Israeli army.

Abu Hadi says that Hamas had decided to neutralize him shortly after. “The Arrow Unit continued to monitor Yasser Abu Shabab’s movements,” he says.

On November 19, Abu Hadi says, “after we confirmed that he was leaving in his well-known car, he was targeted with two RPGs. However, his brother was in the car, not him.”

Yasser Abu Shabab. (Photo: Social Media)

Abu Shabab’s brother, Fathi, was killed in the ambush, which Abu Hadi confirmed had killed over 20 gang members.

“After that, he began burning aid trucks and shooting at drivers instead of pillaging them,” Abu Hadi says. “As revenge.”

The Arrow Force had nevertheless sent Abu Shabab a strong message. “He stopped stealing aid for fear of being killed,” Abu Hadi says.

Shadi al-Sufi, a former criminal convicted of murder and detained before the war, was another alleged gang leader accused of forming a looting group located near the Karam Abu Salem (Kerem Shalom) crossing.

Abu Hadi says that al-Soufi could not have remained in the Karam Abu Salem area without Israeli facilitation. “No one dared reach the location where Shadi al-Sufi and his group were located,” he said. “This is conclusive evidence that he operated under the protection of the Israeli army.”

“The Arrow Force attacked al-Sufi’s groups and attempted to reach him, but the circumstances were not conducive to us,” Abu Hadi added. “Drones were targeting our members and protecting the thieves and criminals.

Al-Sufi later appeared in a video on social media denying the allegations against him. He said that he had been displaced like everyone else since the beginning of the Rafah invasion and that, like all residents, he did not have any flour in his home. He explained that all the rumors circulating about him stealing aid were completely false.

At that point in the war, the Hamas strategy was working. Al-Sufi receded into obscurity, and Abu Shabab also disappeared during the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.

During the ceasefire period, the police and security forces were able to restore order and reassert civil control over Gaza, but the return to war on March 18 was accompanied by the explicitly stated goal of targeting the Hamas civil leadership, pushing all governmental agencies back into hiding.

Almost overnight, looting and theft of food warehouses returned to Gaza, leading the Arrow Unit to redouble its efforts. Yasser Abu Shabab reemerged by May, appearing in photos alongside armed men dressed in full military gear in Rafah, which has been completely emptied of inhabitants and is considered part of a “red zone” under the full control of the Israeli army. His men have been shown sporting Palestinian flags and wearing armbands with “Anti-Terror Force” written on them.

On May 30, the Qassam Brigades released an unusual video of its resistance fighters targeting a group of plainclothed men it said were “musta’ribin” — the Palestinian term for undercover Israeli special forces disguised as Palestinians — but a security source from the resistance in Gaza told Al Jazeera that the targets were a group of collaborators who had been tasked by the Israeli army to loot aid convoys and spy on the activities of the resistance. The source also said that the collaborators were members of Abu Shabab’s group, directly accusing Abu Shabab of working under orders of the Israelis to deepen the state of chaos in Gaza.

Yasser Abu Shabab’s men have been shown sporting Palestinian flags and wearing armbands with “Anti-Terror Force” written on them. (Photo: Social Media)

The video came at a time when reports continued to surface last month of aid convoys being looted in southern Gaza by armed men.

Abu Shabab openly denies these allegations. He has given himself a public makeover on social media, casting himself as an upstanding community figure and “nationalist leader” on his personal Facebook page. He now portrays himself as safeguarding the passage of aid through Rafah.
Facilitating Israel’s displacement plan

Following yesterday’s admission from Netanyahu that Israel was arming his group, the official page of Yasser Abu Shabab’s “Popular Forces” media office, issued a statement on X, continuing to deny any connection with the Israeli army. “We wholly reject these allegations,” the statement read. “We regard this as a blatant attempt at distorting the image of a popular force that was born out of suffering and in the face of oppression, theft, and corruption.”

“We have not and will never be a tool of the occupation,” the statement added. “If the occupation has proof, it should show it to our people and to the international media. We invite everyone to visit our areas and to investigate for themselves before spreading lies that serve the occupation’s narrative in sowing division.”


“The resistance has photographs showing Abu Shabab with the Israeli army.”High-level security source in the resistance

The same high-level security source in the resistance that spoke to Mondoweiss also said that Abu Shabab, according to their intelligence, has connections with “Arab intelligence agencies, which have paved the way for him to act in accordance with the Shabak’s instructions.”

“Especially during the period in which the city of Rafah was occupied, when we saw the increase in the looting of aid trucks,” the source added. “The resistance has photographs showing Abu Shabab with the Israeli army. But the current circumstances do not permit us to publish them due to security considerations.”

Yasser Abu Shabab (right) with his men in Rafah. (Photo: Social Media)

Analysts have continued to point out that Abu Shabab’s carefully curated social media presence, with the appearance of statements in both English and Arabic, is beyond the capabilities of the Gaza gang and is likely the work of the Shin Bet.

“Multiple mainstream media journalists I spoke to believe the level of fluent English used in those posts could only come from an IDF operation room,” Muhammad Shehadeh, a writer and political analyst, wrote on X days before yesterday’s statement from Netanyahu.

Shehadeh says that today, Abu Shabab works in his new capacity as the head of his rebranded “national force” of gang members to loot aid under the Israeli military’s protection, carry out surveillance of resistance forces on its behalf, and secure aid going to the U.S. and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF), which is the U.S. contractor tasked with delivering aid to Palestinians instead of the UN.

The GHF’s distribution centers have been the site of several aid massacres by Israeli forces over the last two weeks, with international aid groups accusing the Foundation’s aid plan of being part of a “blueprint for ethnic cleansing.”

Now, Abu Shabab’s group is being recruited in the service of this blueprint. According to Shehadeh, another one of the tasks Abu Shabab seems to have been entrusted with by the Israeli army is to establish “concentration camps” in Gaza and form a “puppet ‘security force’ that the IDF puts in charge of areas they had depopulated to be their proxy militia against Hamas.”

In an apparent confirmation of this goal, Abu Shabab’s Facebook page released a video, apparently narrated in his voice, calling on the residents of the eastern part of Rafah to return to their homes. “Medicine, food, shelter, and security have been provided,” Abu Shabab said. “Our Popular Forces are working under total Palestinian legitimacy, and in coordination with the official channels.”

The rest of the video contains a montage of Abu Shabab’s men handing out aid to people in eastern Rafah, and is followed by a narrator describing how the Popular Forces are confronting Hamas — referred to as “the government of the status quo” — while sheltering hundreds of families in eastern Gaza in tents, who they have provided with free aid.

It would appear that the calls by the “Popular Forces” for civilians to move to these areas of Rafah, coupled with Abu Shabab’s coordination with the GHF, is proceeding in line with Netanyahu’s plan to use aid as bait to lure Palestinians into isolated concentration camps, with the objective of then forcibly displacing them from Gaza via so-called “voluntary migration.” Moreover, it seems that Israel has now recruited a native proxy militia to implement this plan.

Banner of Yasser Abu Shabab “Popular Forces” page on X. (Photo: Yasser Abu Shabab-Popular Forces X Page)

Clash of the clans

In spite of Abu Shabab’s efforts to paint himself as a nationalist leader, on May 31, the Abu Shabab family in Gaza issued a statement announcing that it was disowning “our son Yasser” a day after the Qassam video was released, distancing themselves from any association with him.

“We, like the rest of the public, were shocked when the resistance broadcast footage showing Yasser’s group engaged in dangerous security work, even participating as undercover agents,” the statement read. “We will pursue and hold him accountable by all means necessary and will not allow him to stain our family’s reputation. He misled us for too long.”

But now that Netanyahu has publicly admitted to “activating” clans in Gaza to oppose Hamas, the Palestinian resistance in the Strip is expected to fight another “internal” front against outright collaboration.

In previous months, rampant looting as a result of Israel’s targeting of Gaza security forces has led several families in Gaza to call for the clans to form “popular committees” for self-defense against thieves, including statements from the Madhoun and al-Ghoul clans in early May. Some of those calls openly advocated for the families to be armed.

At around the same time, armed men belonging to the al-Ghoul family appeared in the area of the Qatari-funded Hamad Rehabilitation Hospital in Gaza City, claiming to be volunteers to protect the hospital from looting. But the group soon dissipated, and the al-Ghoul clan has publicly affirmed its commitment to the rule of law since.

“We formed an armed group to protect the Qatari Hospital because thieves were about to loot it, and we secured it,” Yousri al-Ghoul, one of the family representatives, told Mondoweiss in mid-May. “After that, a security unit was formed by the government to protect the public properties, so we took a step back.”

“All we want is security in Gaza,” al-Ghoul added.

Husni al-Mughni, the head of the Higher Committee for Tribal Affairs in the Gaza Strip, told Mondoweiss in May that “no armed family committee has been formed,” adding that the clans in Gaza “reject the arming of clans, which must prioritize social peace.”

“We are now fighting over water, food, and tents. If families arm themselves, all our battles will become internal,” al-Mughni added.

Yasin al-Madhoun, another clan leader, admits that some members of his family may have discussed forming an armed group, but that the family has not officially taken such a step.

“The family has not decided to form armed units, but we want to maintain security within the Gaza Strip,” al-Madhoun qualified. “In the event that the government collapses or there is a lack of security and safety within the Strip, we must demand a force to maintain security and replace the government to fill the security vacuum. This is no exception in the Gaza Strip. Wherever the government falls, popular committees are formed to protect society.”

At the time, members of the Arrow Unit told Mondoweiss that they would prevent these families from arming themselves, as they would then be co-opted by Israel in service of its genocidal goals.

“We will confront the families who arm themselves, and this is not a matter left to the Arrow unit, but rather to all families in the Gaza Strip,” Abu Islam, one of the Arrow members who spoke to Mondoweiss, said. “All families must stand side by side with the Arrow Unit and all police units to curb the spread of chaos.”

Abu Islam added that many families have rejected these calls. “The attempt to arm families and transform the law into tribal rule has failed, because the families shouldered their responsibilities and rejected this offer from the occupation,” he said.

Nearly a month later, Abu Shabab’s armed gang has now taken on a new name — “the Popular Forces” — and is aiming to fill the security vacuum Israel created by dismantling Gaza’s civil institutions. Among their responsibilities are the distribution of aid to locals as a means of gaining popular support and securing aid to the GHF sites.

“It is no secret that the occupation has hunted down every part of the security forces, since they represent the backstop to maintaining the internal front, which is in direct contradiction to the [Israeli army’s] war aims,” the security source in the resistance who spoke to Mondoweiss said. “Its aim is to create chaos in Gaza as revenge against civilians, because they embrace the resistance,” the source added.

Faris Giacaman
Faris Giacaman is Mondoweiss’ Palestine Editorial Director.

Tareq S. Hajjaj
Tareq S. Hajjaj is the Gaza Correspondent for Mondoweiss and a member of the Palestinian Writers Union. Follow him on Twitter/X at @Tareqshajjaj.



Detained Columbia University graduate says he suffered ‘irreparable harms,’ pleads for release

June 7, 2025 


Demonstrators gather outside United States Federal Court House in New York City to show support for pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil and demand his immediate release from ICE detention. New York, U.S., March 12, 2025 [Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu Agency]


A Columbia University graduate being held at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in Louisiana has submitted a plea for his release as a federal judge weighs his decision in the case, Anadolu reports.

Mahmoud Khalil, who was transferred from his home state of New York 1,400 miles (2,253 kilometers) away to Louisiana, made the official court filing on June 4 after the judge requested his reasons for release. His court filing was unsealed on Thursday.

“The irreparable harms I have suffered—and continue to suffer … (are the) result of the government’s actions against me,” Khalil wrote.

“These harms are wide-ranging: they include dignitary and reputational harm, personal and familial hardship, including constant fear for personal safety, continued detention, restrictions on my freedom of expression, and severe damage to my professional future,” he continued.

Khalil, 30, is facing deportation after the Trump administration directed ICE to detain him for his pro-Palestinian activism on campus. He was originally taken into custody on March 8 and transferred to Louisiana without due process of a court hearing or retaining an attorney, and has been held there ever since, missing out on the birth of his child.

READ: US alleges Columbia University student covered up his work for UNRWA

“Instead of holding my wife’s hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,” said Khalil. “When I heard my son’s first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.”

Khalil’s filing explains what he describes as the humiliation he has endured since he was arrested.

“I remember seeing the public statements issued by the White House and President Trump on social media,” Khalil wrote. “It is hard to describe the humiliation and pain of seeing mugshot-style images of myself circulated from the highest levels of the U.S. government—accompanied by inflammatory language, grotesque and false accusations, and open celebration of my deportation.”

“These were not just attacks on my character; they were efforts to erase my humanity,” he said.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said Khalil should simply self-deport, referring to the Trump administration’s offer of a $1,000 payment and a free flight to his home country.

Khalil obtained a green card for legal residency in the US, but the Trump administration says it is revoking it as part of the president’s crackdown on students who participated in pro-Palestinian protests.

Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration’s effort to deport Khalil is likely unconstitutional.

Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote that the government’s primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to US foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement against others.
UNRWA slams Israeli ban on international journalists reporting on Gaza, calls to allow it to work

June 7, 2025 
MEMO


UNRWA Commissioner General Philippe Lazzarini on April 30, 2024 [FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images]

Philippe Lazzarini, the commissioner-general of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), on Saturday condemned Israel’s ongoing ban on international journalists entering Gaza, calling it an unprecedented act in modern conflict, Anadolu reports.

“This is unprecedented in any other conflict in modern history,” Lazzarini said in a statement.

“It is a ban on the truth. It is a ban on reporting the facts. It is the perfect recipe to fuel misinformation, deepening polarization and dehumanization.”

He stressed the importance of allowing independent reporting and supporting local journalists: “International journalists must independently report from Gaza and support their Palestinian colleagues who continue to do a heroic job at a heavy price.”

“Nearly 200 of them were reported killed since the war began,” said Lazzarini, stressing that “the ban on international media must be lifted.”

Separately, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) on Saturday reiterated its call for cooperation from the Israeli government over allegations made against the agency, stating that no credible evidence has been provided despite repeated requests.

“UNRWA has repeatedly requested cooperation and evidence from Israel regarding the serious allegations made against the Agency,” the agency said in an official statement.

READ: At least 65 Palestinians killed, 100 more injured as Israel continues attacks on Gaza on 2nd day of Eid

“After 20 months, UNRWA has not received any response, nor has the Government of Israel shared any sufficient evidence.”

The agency emphasized its continued commitment to its humanitarian mandate, stating: “UNRWA remains committed to its mandate and is ready to deliver humanitarian assistance at scale in Gaza, together with other UN agencies.”

Israel, rejecting international calls for a ceasefire, has pursued a genocidal offensive in Gaza since October 2023, killing nearly 54,700 Palestinians, most of them women and children. Aid agencies have warned about the risk of famine among the enclave’s more than 2 million inhabitants.

Last November, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

Israel also faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its war crimes against civilians in the enclave.

UK

Rallying the Opposition to Disability Benefit Cuts

JUNE 5, 2025

Michael Calderbank looks ahead to Tuesday evening’s online rally.

With a vote on over £5bn of punitive disability benefits cuts still expected for later this month, disabled campaigners, trade unions, charities, carers’ groups and a growing body of Labour MPs are piling on the pressure for a climbdown.  

Rachel Reeves’ forthcoming Spending Review announcement represents a pivotal moment in determining the direction of the Labour Government for the next few years. Unless the Chanceller is prepared to relax her rigid self-imposed fiscal rules, a further round of austerity cuts will be inevitable. The Government’s own impact assessment of Liz Kendall’s welfare reforms suggest that a further 350,000 people will be pushed over the poverty line, while households already experiencing poverty will be disproportionately hit.

Perhaps the Government think that disabled people are a vulnerable group who can’t fight back. But they need only recall the inspiring campaign of direct action fought by Disabled People Against the Cuts which resulted in the hated ATOS losing the contract for undertaking Work Capability Assessments to realise they will face a real fight.  

Trade unionists also understand that we must not allowed the interests of workers to be played off against disabled or chronically sick people who need welfare support. It is untrue to pretend that the Personal Independence Payment is an ;out of work’ benefit – when in reality it offers vital independence to many disabled workers. Any one of us might find ourselves unable to work in the future, and in those circumstances, will want to be treated fairly and with dignity. Millions of workers have disabled members of our families, or have neighbours and friends who do. The disability benefit cuts are an attack on our class as a whole, and we need to stand in solidarity against this renewed offensive,

This is why national trade unions affiliated to the Trade Union Coordinating Group will be joining forces with Arise for an urgent online rally on the eve of the Spending Review announcement, Tuesday 10th July. FBU General Secretary Steve Wright and BFAWU’s Sarah Woolley will be joined by speakers from DPAC, Disability Labour and MPs from across the country in voicing opposition to the proposals, and demanding Labour changes course. Martin Cavanagh and Angela Grant of the Department for Work and Pensions Group in PCS will bring solidarity from those working on the frontline of the system and understand how devastating these cuts would be.

These cuts aren’t inevitable. By relaxing the ‘fiscal rules’ and bringing forward plans to tax the wealthiest in society, the Government could invest in jobs and  services while providing genuine social security for all.     

Join us on Tuesday June 10th from 6.30pm to demand Labour ditches the attacks on disabled people

Register here.

Diane Abbott MP // Zarah Sultana MP // Ellen Clifford, Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) // Ian Byrne MP // Kathy Bole, Disability Labour // Angela Grant, PCS NEC // Neil Duncan-Jordan MP // Sarah Woolley, BFAWU // Brian Leishman MP // Steve Wright, FBU // John McDonnell MP // Mads Wainman, Labour Students Disabled Students’ Officer // Richard Burgon MP // Steve Wright, FBU. Chair: Martin Cavanagh, PCS President.

Michael Calderbank is Trade Union Liaison Officer of Tottenham CLP.

Photo: c/o Labour Hub.

UK

Defend the Filton 18!

JUNE 7, 2025

Tom London reports on the activists awaiting trial for trying to stop the flow of arms to Israel.

On 6th August 2024, six people from a group called Palestine Action gained entry into a factory owned by Elbit Systems UK in Filton on the outskirts of Bristol. Elbit Systems UK is a subsidiary of the largest manufacturer of arms for the Israeli military.

Elbit produces 85% of the Israel Defence Force’s (IDF) land-based equipment, and 85% of its drones, and advertises its products as “battle-tested” in Gaza and the West Bank.

Inside the factory, the six set about damaging equipment and weapons. These included a number of quadcopter drones. 

Drones are now a central part of modern warfare. They have the huge advantage that the enemy can be killed while your own soldiers are out of harm’s way. 

Israel claims to be fighting a war against Hamas in Gaza but, in reality, there is no war in Gaza. Israel is carrying out a genocide. At least 70% of those killed are women and children.

The mere sound of drones terrorises the inhabitants of Gaza who have had their homes, schools, hospitals and infrastructure destroyed and are being starved to death.

Drones can carry weapons. Elbit’s website announces that a particular drone is “designed to enhance infantry squad lethality, beyond its detection and engagement range with stand-off warfare capabilities. [It] enables fast and accurate engagement against a low signature enemy.”

 Low signature enemy? I think they mean killing people who are not militarily equipped to defend themselves. Like, civilians in a genocide.

The only word that captures the moral depravity of carrying out a genocide is “evil”. Quadcopter drones killing civilians is evil.

Incredibly, drones have been used in Gaza for something which even amidst all this evil, stands out. Israel has used drones to mimic the sound of babies crying and of women screaming with the aim of luring Palestinians into the open where they can be shot.

The six activists were arrested inside the Elbit factory. Later twelve others were arrested for allegedly being involved. They are known as the Filton 18.

The police have treated this as a case of terrorism rather than a case of criminal damage. All 18 of those arrested have pleaded not guilty. They have been denied bail, which would not generally be the case if there was not the allegation that this was terrorism-related. Four UN experts have written to the relevant authorities arguing that the police are misusing counter-terrorism measures.

Three trial dates have been set – November 2025, May 2026, June 2026. If any of the Filton 18 are found not guilty at trial, they will still have spent a long time in prison.

Until the last few years, the Filton 18 could have been confident that they would get the chance to tell the jury the reasons for their actions. 

However, in recent years the law has been changed – by a combination of Parliament and judges – to remove the right of defendants to explain to juries their motivations. This change followed numerous acquittals of climate protestors. Juries must have decided in many cases that “you may be technically guilty, but we will not convict you because we respect your motive.” Ministers and judges were furious at the actions of these juries.

A spokesperson for Palestine Action has said – absolutely correctly in law – that the Filton 18, “were only trying to do what our government, under international law, [should have done but] has totally failed to do – to stop the flow of arms to Israel being used to commit a genocide.”

On 30th June, it is expected that the court will rule on whether the Filton 18 can tell the jury at their trials why they damaged the quadcopter drones and the other weapons and equipment. 

Defend Our Juries are a group campaigning to allow defendants to always have the opportunity to explain their actions when their liberty is at stake, including by explaining their motivations and beliefs. They are organising an exhibition and a show of solidarity with the Filton 18 on 30th June at Kingston-upon-Thames Crown Court. If you are interested in being involved, you can contact them on info@defendourjuries.org

Tom London is an activist based in north London.

On 17th June, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign is organising three regional protests at sites supplying Israel’s F-35 fighter jets in Havant, Rochester and Sheffield. More details here.

Main image: c/o Labour Hub

UK

After the Employment Rights Bill – give all workers full employment rights


JUNE 2, 2025

By Jeff Slee

The Government’s Employment Rights Bill will probably become law this month. It puts into law some of the commitments made in the ‘New Deal for Working People’ agreed between the Labour leadership and affiliated unions in May 2024. But, while the passing of this bill will be a step forward, there will still be many improvements to employment law that the trade unions should campaign for. A key one is the question of workers’ status, which is not dealt with in the bill.

As theLabour Research Department’s guide The Employment Rights Bill January 2025 said:

“A significant omission from the bill is the lack of any provision concerning the creation of a single worker status, which was a fundamental element of the New Deal.

Many of the employment rights covered in the bill apply only to employees, including changes to unfair dismissal, sick pay, parental leave, bereavement leave and flexible working. And a huge number of workers in the gig economy, who employers allege are ‘self-employed’ will see no advance in their rights as a result of the bill.”

Why this is important

This matters because, while most workers are employees who have a contract of employment and access to all employment rights, there are millions of workers who are not, in law, employees. They have fewer employment rights than employees, or no rights at all. These workers are also often in insecure jobs, on lower pay than employees, on zero-hour contracts, and with no guarantee of hours or income.

This obviously makes life hard for those workers and their families. It also makes it attractive for companies to take on workers without full employee status. It allows them to cut their wage costs, undermine those who are their employees, avoid employer national insurance contributions, give them more control over hiring and firing and hours of work, and undercut their competitors. This is likely to increase with the coming into force of the Employment Rights Act, and the rise in employer national insurance contributions.

Workers who are not employees

In law, these come under two categories.

Limb (b) workers (I don’t know why they are called that) are those who are “in dependent working relationships but are not employees.”

They have some basic employment rights, including the right to paid holiday and to receive the National Minimum Wage. But they have fewer rights than employees – for example, they have no protection against unfair dismissal. Many of the 900,000 agency workers in the UK come into this category. Agency workers are employed by an employment agency, but work under the direction and control of an “end hirer” – the company that wants to use them. While companies will use agency workers for short-term needs, they also use agency workers to fill posts on a longer-term basis that should be taken by full-time employees. We see this in the rail industry, where Train Operating Companies often have agency workers filling posts on station platforms and gatelines for months on end.

Then there are the self-employed. These include those genuinely self-employed, such as painters and decorators, and barristers and freelance journalists. But there are also many in bogus self-employment – as the LRD explains:

“There are many examples of sham self-employment, especially in sectors such as construction and in the gig economy, where rogue employers deliberately draft contract documentation to exclude or minimise employment rights.”

Some unions have taken up legal cases to get more rights for those in the gig economy. The GMB and IWGB campaign for the 31,000 Uber drivers in the UK. They took legal claims for greater employment rights up to the UK Supreme Court, which in 2021 ruled that Uber drivers must be treated as limb (b) workers rather than self-employed,giving them entitlement totheminimum wage and holiday pay. But in a similar claim for Deliveroo workers, the Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that Deliveroo riders are self-employed, not even limb (b) workers.

What should be done?

The Institute of Employment Rights, Labour MPs including Andy McDonald and John McDonnell, trade unions and others, are pressing the Government to bring in a new law to deal with this issue of workers’ status. And quickly. John McDonnell told the PCS conference last month that a second Employment Rights Bill should be brought forward this autumn.

The Director of Labour Market Enforcement at the Department for Business and Trade, Margaret Beels, told the House of Commons Business and Trade Select Committee considering the Employment Rights Bill that:

“We are getting more and more workers who are being shuffled into what are deemed to be self-employment situations, which I do not believe are appropriate for self-employment.”

She said that “the whole business of employment status needs to be addressed”, adding that “you can probably consult until the cows come home on this issue… it is about time to do something about it.”

She also outlined her views in a recent Financial Times article.

The Select Committee, in its report on the Employment Rights Bill on 3rd March 2025 agreed. It said:

“Status of worker does not feature in the Employment Rights Bill, although the Government has committed to a consultation on the issue. The Government has told us that it sees these reforms as a longer-term goal. However, if reforms to employment status are delayed, lawyers and unions have warned that businesses could sidestep the Employment Rights Bill by hiring staff as self-employed contractors, temps or agency workers. This would mean those workers would not be entitled to the reforms laid out in the Bill.”

And the Committee recommended:

“While the Committee welcomes the Government’s plans to reform worker status and bogus self-employment, it must proceed at pace to turn ambition into action. If it does not, it risks more companies adopting a ‘self-employment’ model for their workforces to side-step the measures in the Employment Rights Bill.”

The Government’s response to the Select Committee report pledged only to look at this issue sometime in the future. They said they are “committed to consulting on reform to employment status.… the Government sees consulting on a simpler employment status framework as a longer-term goal. It will take time to adequately develop and consult on such a far-reaching change to employment law.”

This is not good enough. Bills to address this question in legislation have been put forward by Lord John Hendy KC, Chair of the Institute of Employment Rights, in the House of Lords in 2021 and again in 2023.

Unions should press the government to act quickly to bring in a single status of worker, with full employment rights, to cover all except the genuinely self-employed.

Jeff Slee is a retired rail worker and former RMT National Executive Committee member.

Image: https://www.picpedia.org/legal-17/w/workers-rights.html License: Creative Commons 3 – CC BY-SA 3.0 Attribution Link: Pix4free.org – link to – https://pix4free.org/ Original Author: Nick Youngson – link to – http://www.nyphotographic.com/ Original Image: https://www.picpedia.org/legal-17/w/workers-rights.html