Showing posts sorted by date for query FARMWORKERS. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query FARMWORKERS. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

US Workers Have No  Federal Protection From the Deadliest Weather Hazard

We protect workers from ladder falls, electric shocks, even excessive noise, with clear and enforceable rules, yet there is still no federal standard requiring employers to provide the basics on dangerously hot days.


A worker adjusts his helmet on a construction site under the sun as southern California faces a heatwave, in Los Angeles, on July 3 2024.
(Photo by Etienne Laurent / AFP via Getty Images)

Juanita Constible
Aug 25, 2026
Common Dreams

We are breaking past heat records, but they will not stand for long. Summer heat now arrives earlier, lasts longer, spikes higher, and lands in places that never planned for it.

For the tens of millions of Americans who work outdoors, and the millions more in warehouses, kitchens, and factories without air conditioning, there is still no federal standard requiring an employer to give a worker water, shade, rest, or training on a day when the heat can kill.

Between 1992 and 2019, more than 900 workers died from heat on the job, and every year tens of thousands more are sickened or injured—farmworkers collapsing in fields, roofers baking on exposed surfaces, laundry and dollar store workers laboring in buildings that trap heat like ovens. Those official numbers are undercounts, because heat deaths are chronically underreported.

Heat illness is not a scientific mystery. Heat stroke can kill in minutes, but staying safe is mostly about staying cool, hydrated, and getting help fast when confusion or dizziness sets in.

No one should be sent into a hotter, more volatile climate with nothing but the occasional popsicle and luck.

We protect workers from ladder falls, electric shocks, even excessive noise, with clear and enforceable rules. Yet there is still no federal standard requiring employers to provide the basics on dangerously hot days.

We came close. In 2024, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) proposed the first-ever national heat safety standard. In 2025, the agency heard weeks of testimony from workers, doctors, unions, and employers. Then the progress on a strong rule stalled.

Now, some in Congress want to bury it for good. The House Education and the Workforce Committee recently voted to advance the Heat Workforce Standards Act, which would bar the Labor Department from finalizing or enforcing the heat rule.

This isn’t a pause. It’s a lock on the door, designed to stop not just this administration but any future one from protecting workers from heat. The bill’s sponsor called workplace heat a problem that doesn’t need solving. Easy to say when you spend every day in air conditioning. Impossible to accept when your loved one doesn’t come home.

The industry groups behind the bill insist protections cost too much, the argument once made against seatbelts, hard hats, and fire exits. The numbers say otherwise. OSHA estimates a single average case of heat exhaustion costs more than $79,000 in medical bills, lost time, and lost productivity. Water and rest breaks are cheap. Hospitalizations and funerals are not.

So if Washington won’t act, who will?

Investors can. Companies that get ahead of this aren’t only doing right by their workers; they’re managing a financial risk that shows up in turnover, litigation, and lost output. The Natural Resources Defense Council and Trillium’s new guide for investors gives shareholders the questions to ask in the boardroom, and boards tend to listen when the people who own the company start asking them.

States can, and are. Seven now have heat standards, and lawmakers in Pennsylvania and Virginia are working to join them. Every state that acts protects its own workers now and builds the case that no one’s safety should depend on their zip code.

The people facing this risk grow our food, build our homes, deliver our packages, and cook our meals. Many of them will not ask for water or a break today—afraid of retaliation, afraid of losing a shift, afraid of losing a paycheck they cannot afford to lose. No one should have to weigh a livelihood against a life. And no one should be sent into a hotter, more volatile climate with nothing but the occasional popsicle and luck.

Employers who resist these rules imagine that breaks cost them too much. They have it backward. Heat is already hurting both workers’ health and their bottom line. Protections like water and rest don’t subtract from a workday, they only help workers do their job.

The toll from this summer is still being counted. Every party to this—Congress, employers, investors, states—can still decide how high it goes.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Juanita Constible
Juanita Constible is the senior advocate for environmental health at the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Full Bio >







Sunday, August 23, 2026

Union-Busters Are Using ICE to Intimidate California Wine Industry Workers

California’s wine industry runs on immigrant exploitation. Now migrant workers are unionizing.


By David Bacon ,
Truthout
August 20, 2026

Renee Saucedo speaks at an immigrant rights rally.  David Bacon

In late July, Raul Calvo, a well-known California union-buster, called workers at the Rodney Strong Vineyards into a meeting. Salvador Ramirez, who’d labored among big wine tanks for 12 years, says he was shocked by what he heard. “He said he was just going to give us the information that he got in an email three days ago, that ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] was here outside,” Ramirez remembers, noting that Calvo told workers the vineyard was technically in a border zone due to its proximity to the ocean.

Ramirez says workers were very upset — not just by Calvo’s implied threat, but because the company’s attitude had changed drastically. Last October, when there were rumors that ICE agents planned a wave of raids in the San Francisco Bay Area like those underway in Los Angeles, the company had called everyone into a meeting. Ramirez recalled, “‘You’re our workers,’ they told us. ‘We have to support you and we’re not going to allow them to come in [without a judge’s warrant]. We’re going to take care of each other.’“

Calvo did not respond to Truthout’s request for comment.

In the months afterwards, however, workers began talking with each other. They then reached out to North Bay Jobs with Justice (JwJ), a coalition of community organizations and unions in Sonoma and Napa Counties with a long history of fighting for workers’ rights. North Bay JwJ helped them organize a workplace committee, and put them in touch with Teamsters Local 665, a union with representatives on the organization’s board.

Ramirez and 31 of the winery’s 50 workers signed a petition asking that the company agree to a card check process for recognizing the union they’d formed, and for a “fair process to exercise our right to organize and form a union without threats and intimidation.” At the beginning of June, they took it to management. Rafael Malfavon, whom the workers call “Junior,” presented it and asked the company to accept their decision. Community leaders — including Chris Herrod, the mayor of Healdsburg — went along to support them.


California’s Wealthy Wine Industry Routinely Endangers Health of Its Workers
Between wildfires and immigration status, California vineyard workers contend with a host of hurdles to their health. By David Bacon , Truthout  August 27, 2024


The company’s response was to hire a local union-buster, Jesse Rojas, who held two meetings with workers. Then Calvo, Rojas’s boss, showed up. When he challenged Calvo in a meeting over misstatements about unions, Malfavon says he was ridiculed. “That just proved to us that the company won’t listen to what workers are saying and what we’re asking for, and hired this dude who calls me a liar,” he said.

Workers formed a delegation and went to Becky Oseguera, the company’s human relations director. According to Ramirez, “One of us said the company had brought in these people and they were trying to intimidate us with the migra, and that wasn’t right. I said, ‘We believe this is a very serious line that’s been crossed.’ She told us, ‘Don’t you see that I’m very busy, with all this stuff that you’re doing?’”

Participants in a North Bay Jobs with Justice march demand sueldos dignos, or fair wages.
Copyright David BaconDavid Bacon


Why Workers Organized

Ramirez and his co-workers started organizing in part because the company was terminating longtime workers. “They started having meetings with us,” Malfavon recalled, “saying they had to cut their budget. No one would get bonuses like before. We noticed that we weren’t getting raises while we had to do extra work, and they wouldn’t hire people to help. But the executives were getting promotions.”

One fired worker was Belen Flores, who had banged her knee at work and was then let go by the company, citing a genetic vision problem as a pretext. “I could always do my job to the last day,” Flores said. “I never got even a warning.”

Ramirez was incensed. “She’d been working here for nine years, and they fired her just like that,” he said. “There were rumors that there are five more people on the list after Belen. I could see the future that awaits us.”

Malfavon said that when his brother was terminated, he asked the company for some explanation. “They didn’t want to answer any of my questions. I had no words. I literally sat in the corner and started crying. I felt so powerless.”

The terminations came on top of increasing economic pressure. Despite working at Rodney Strong while also holding another full-time job, Malfavon is still living at home with his parents. Two-thirds of the people working in the winery have second jobs, he says. Malfavon is desperately trying to save enough money to set up a new home with his wife in Sonoma County. “It’s a huge step I’m making. I work over 80 hours a week, all the time, and I can’t meet the rent. I just have three pairs of pants that I’ve had for six years.”

Although winemaking has the image of a small-scale craft, in reality it’s a major industry in which workers labor in factory-like environments with huge tanks and pipes in buildings that can seem endless. It is dangerous work where insufficient safety measures can put workers’ lives at risk, and accidents can have catastrophic consequences. The deadliest hazard is work inside the tanks, cellars, and confined spaces, where a person can be quickly overcome by carbon dioxide and other gases.

In the last two decades, casualties included Gustavo Javier Muro at Ancien Wines and Salvador Plaza-Centeno at Dry Creek Vineyard. Leon Marcelo Lua was drawn into a machine, another industry hazard, after he’d been working for 10 hours at De Coninck Vineyards. Other wine industry laborers have died in falls or been crushed by machinery.

Rodney Strong Vineyards does not have a record of industrial accidents causing major worker harm, but six years ago, 97,000 gallons of cabernet sauvignon wine poured from a tank when a door popped open, ending up in a creek feeding the Russian River. While no one was hurt, anyone in the path of the wine could have been overcome and swept through tanks and machinery.


Why Workers Want a Fair Process

For workers, the ability to work safely is guaranteed not just by company or government protocols, but by their own power on the job. To win that power, they want a “fair process,” as they outlined in their petition. This process does not use the election machinery of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), but instead seeks a neutral party to verify that a majority of workers have signed cards or a petition. According to Local 665 President Mike Yates, this process was used recently by workers at a local Ready Mix concrete company. Other workers have used it at Sonoma County hotels.

Christopher O’Gorman, Rodney Strong’s senior director of marketing communications, sent Truthout a statement saying the company respects workers’ right to decide on unionization, but wants an election supervised by the NLRB: “A Card Check Neutrality Agreement limits our ability to share information with employees, reduces transparency, and, most importantly, replaces the protections of a secret-ballot election with a process that does not provide the same level of privacy for employees making this important decision.”

Rodney Strong workers want a card check because they believe the process administered by the NLRB is manipulated by companies and union-busters like Calvo, while the Trump administration has biased the board even further against workers and unions. During the Biden administration, Jennifer Abruzzo, general counsel for the NLRB, issued a memo holding that certain captive-audience meetings were illegal. Those meetings are mandatory for workers, who are required to listen to harangues about the dangers of unions and organizing.

Donald Trump fired Abruzzo and replaced her with Crystal Stowe Carey, a partner in the notorious anti-union law firm Morgan Lewis. Carey then announced she would overturn that ruling, making mandatory meetings with union-busters legal. The Senate recently confirmed a new Republican majority on the NLRB, committed to that and other reversals of pro-worker rules and procedures.

The meetings held by Rojas and Calvo might have been borderline legal, since they were not mandatory, and some workers even chose to attend in order to refute the propaganda barrage. But using immigration threats to scare workers and create an atmosphere of fear is certainly a violation of labor law. Unfortunately, enforcement of that law and workers’ rights now lies in the hands of Carey and Trump’s NLRB. Workers might reasonably lack confidence that they will ensure Rodney Strong Vineyards refrains from retaliating against union supporters.

Instead, the organizing strategy of Jobs with Justice and the Teamsters at Rodney Strong depends on a strong commitment by workers to build their union inside the winery, and on the Sonoma County community to act to support them. When the workers began this process, “I was scared and I still am a little,” Malfavon said, “but I’m getting over that fear because they’re just trying to intimidate us to make us stop.”

Workers had confidence in this course of action, urged by JwJ and the Teamsters, because both have a track record in Sonoma County. “My wife and my children have come to marches and protests,” Ramirez said. “They see that we don’t fight alone, that there are people who have the same goals we want to achieve — a better quality of life for our families. So we’ll keep going until we get what we want.”
David Bacon


A Track Record of Coalition-Building to Defend Workers and Immigrants

For several years, North Bay Jobs with Justice has campaigned for higher wages to compensate workers for the risks and health impacts of work in heavy smoke during the forest fire season. In 2022, JwJ and supporters went to the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, demanding stiffer protection requirements for growers who ask permission to send workers to harvest grapes in wildfire evacuation zones. The companies brought in Raul Calvo, who organized an astroturf group claiming to be farmworkers to show up at a supervisor meeting in T-shirts saying “NB [North Bay] JwJ does NOT Speak for Me.” Calvo also conducted captive-audience meetings for wine industry workers to combat the campaign.

Since 2020, Calvo has not filed the LM-20 and LM-21 forms the Department of Labor has required from anti-union consultants. There is no record of the money growers paid for his campaign against fire protections for workers, or how much Rodney Strong Vineyards is paying now. Rojas was listed as a consultant to Calvo on a 2020 form for work in another union-busting campaign, for which he was paid $283,633.

Workers exposed Rojas’s 2020 payment in a leaflet to local activists. “Our community has responded in a very positive and supportive way,” said Renee Saucedo, coordinator of the Sonoma County Sanctuary Coalition and director of the Raizes Collective, an organizing project among immigrant women workers. “Many of us have come to pickets co-sponsored by the Teamsters and Jobs with Justice, and we are ready to act.”

Rodney Strong workers have offered support to the broader community in return. When Malfavon went to a meeting of the Sonoma County Tenants Union, “it was inspiring,” he said. “I saw other people going through injustices, and then you see yourself in that. As much as they want to support us, I want to support them, to grow bigger and be more united in general.”

So far, according to Yates, community activists have mobilized at least three times. In addition to accompanying workers when they handed management their petition, 200 people picketed a summer event, causing Rodney Strong to cancel it, and 250 attended a counter-demonstration to a company disco night fundraiser. Public officials also refused to cross the workers’ picket line. “No one believes the company’s claim that they’re looking for an open and transparent process,” Yates said, “when they threaten the workers in the same breath, using hired guns to scare them.”


For many community organizations, the use of immigration scare tactics highlighted a larger danger of industry cooperation with immigration enforcement. Over the past year, Sonoma County has witnessed a growing wave of demonstrations opposing the county sheriff’s policy of turning people incarcerated in jail over to ICE. So far in 2026, the sheriff has handed 21 people to ICE for deportation.

When the Sonoma County Farm Bureau, representing the largest wine industry employers, defended the sheriff’s actions, the Sanctuary Coalition held a die-in and press conference outside its offices. In a statement, Dayna Ghirardelli, executive director of the Sonoma County Farm Bureau, said the agency favored enforcement that targeted “criminals.”

“Our farms and ranches depend upon immigrant workers,” she said. “But respect for immigrant families does not require abandoning common sense. In fact, if it were legally possible, I would support deporting some individuals convicted of the most serious and violent crimes who are U.S. citizens as well.”

The North Bay Central Labor Council, to which Local 665 belongs, rejected that argument and urged the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors to pass a “Non-Collaboration With ICE” ordinance. “Sonoma County is not safer by providing information to ICE. Quite the opposite,” the labor council wrote to supervisors in a letter. “The recent killings by ICE and US Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis, by poorly trained agents, tell us that nobody is safe under these conditions.”

Saucedo responded to Ghiradelli: “How can employers of immigrants, including undocumented immigrants, say that they support workers when they are supporting policies that clearly hurt them?” While Rodney Strong Vineyards is not a Farm Bureau member, Saucedo says Calvo’s statement to its workers was not an aberration. “Employers are increasingly using the threat of ICE when workers complain about working conditions and wages. In the world of domestic workers, employers make constant threats to call ICE.”

By the same token, restraining the ability of wineries and growers to weaponize fear of ICE and deportation can create a more supportive environment for workers trying to organize. “When we see companies threaten people with immigration status, or with the loss of wages or the closure of their workplaces, we’re going to take that on,” said Alejandro Negrete, the organizing director of Teamsters Joint Council 7.

Saucedo believes the campaign is creating stronger partnerships between community-based organizations and unions. “It’s pushing unions to do more to organize as equal partners in communities of immigrant workers,” she said. “Immigrant rights and workers’ rights are inseparable and must be defended together.”
Sonoma County farmworkers march through Healdsburg on July 28, 2024.  David Bacon


From the Wineries to the Fields


Creating that supportive environment may also help in organizing field workers who pick the grapes for the wineries. Local farmworkers face not only the possibility of detention and deportation, but the loss of their jobs. In the last decade, Sonoma and Napa County winemakers have brought a growing wave of immigrants to work in their fields under the H-2A visa program. Last fall, the Trump administration cut the legally required wage for these temporary contract laborers by $3/hour in California, and now is allowing growers to charge them another $3/hour for the often substandard housing they formerly had to supply for free. Workers who protest abusive conditions, including these changes, can be fired at will, and are then blacklisted by recruiters.

According to Marcos Lopez, research director for the Labor and Community Center at the University of California, Davis, in 2008 the Department of Labor certified Sonoma County growers to fill only 92 jobs with H-2A workers. Last year, that had grown to 1,639 jobs, about a quarter of the wine industry jobs in the county. Those workers stayed not just for the 10-12 week harvest, but for an average of 39 weeks.

“The H-2A program has led to the casualization of labor for local workers,” Lopez said. “Local residents, who once held year-round positions, are increasingly hired only during peak seasons, like the harvest, essentially as a temporary workforce.”

JwJ organizer Max Bell Alper says local farmworkers fear that they can be displaced at any time. “People were experiencing a shitty job already,” he said, “and it was getting worse. But they’re desperate for the work they have, and as H-2A recruitment mushrooms, they have not been ready to organize.”

“For decades, the Sonoma County wine industry has generated immense wealth on the backs of workers,” added JwJ organizer Gabriel Cardenas. “But the current economic conditions are unsustainable for workers, and that’s leading to a growing realization that collective action is essential for survival.”

Malfavon believes organizing Rodney Strong Vineyards will therefore help everyone. “This is for the field workers going out there at two or three in the morning, for the truck drivers that put in countless hours with no sleep, and for every other worker in the winery, from the people that sell it to the people that consume it,” he said. “I want them to see how many people it takes for them to actually enjoy a nice bottle of wine. I want them to see what we’re fighting for — to make our voices heard.”

An important fundraising appeal: We still need to raise $9,000

Truthout is one of only a few platforms for justice-oriented, grassroots journalism. Today, as political censorship from the right intensifies, we have no choice but to ask for your help.

We are fundraising right now to cover our basic operating expenses. If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work. Anything you can do makes a difference — we appreciate your support.


Copyright © David Bacon

David Bacon

David Bacon is a writer and photographer, and former union organizer. He is the author of several books on labor, migration and the global economy, including In the Fields of the North / En los campos del norte, The Children of NAFTA, Communities Without Borders, Illegal People and The Right to Stay Home. His photographs and stories can be found at here and here.

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

‘It’s been chaotic’: Trump’s immigration crackdown prompts worries from industry groups

Priscilla Alvarez, 
CNN
Sat, August 8, 2026 



Masked ICE agents stands guard outside the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey, during a protest against the transfer of detainees on May 26. - Andres Kudacki/AP

Industry groups ranging from construction to agriculture are raising concerns with the Trump administration over its ongoing immigration crackdown, arguing it is undercutting President Donald Trump's agenda and weakening the economy, according to multiple groups who spoke with CNN and sources close to the White House.

Worker shortages have been a years-long problem for multiple industries, but the recent abrupt push to end deportation protections for 1.3 million people who had been legally working in the US and the aggressive immigration enforcement push nationwide are exacerbating an already challenging issue, industry representatives say.

Those industry groups — which are generally supportive of other parts of Trump's economic agenda — are taking their immigration concerns directly to the administration, including the departments of Homeland Security, Labor, and Agriculture, as well as the White House.

Within the administration, the tug between industry concerns and immigration enforcement has prompted internal disagreements over how to pursue other types of enforcement, like at worksites, according to three sources familiar with the ongoing debate. One source close to the White House called the back and forth and consistent influence of lobbying on decisions "a bit manic."

Caught in the middle is Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, who is already under fire from some corners of the president's base for appearing too soft on immigration.


Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin listens during a cabinet meeting at Camp David in Thurmont, Maryland, on July 31. - Jacquelyn Martin/AP

"A workforce that's an illegal workforce only grows illegal activity. It doesn't grow the economy in the long term. It's a short-term solution, but it's going to be long term problems," Mullin said at the National Governors Association meeting last week, citing conversations with labor and industry groups to find solutions.

His remarks at the gathering, where he also called for changes to employment visa programs to address worker shortages, sparked fierce pushback from influential MAGA voices. "I am so fed up with Markwayne Mullin," far-right Trump ally Laura Loomer wrote on X.

Hours after the event, Mullin posted on X: "NO amnesty for illegal aliens. Ever. We are a nation of laws. If you are illegally present in the United States of America—you will be detained and deported. Period."

But the episode underscored the delicate balance for Trump of pressing ahead with mass deportations — including, for example, construction workers — while trying to fulfill other promises like lowering housing prices.

"He ran on creating more housing supply," said Jim Tobin, president and CEO of the National Association of Home Builders, one of the country's largest trade organizations. "These two things might be working against each other at the moment. But we continue to make our case."

Trump officials haven't offered any assurances in return, Tobin said, other than a commitment to immigration enforcement.

Asked by CNN to respond, a Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement: "If people want to come to our country to work, they need to do that by coming here the legal way. The assertion that the only way we can support industries is by allowing unvetted illegal aliens and foreigners to remain in the country is grossly false and lazy."

White House spokesperson Lauren Bis said, "There is no shortage of American minds and hands to grow our labor force," adding that "Trump will continue growing our economy, creating opportunity for American workers, and ensuring all sectors have the legal workforce they need to be successful."

CNN also reached out to the departments of Labor and Agriculture for comment.
The impact of ending TPS

Over the last week, immigration enforcement has ramped up against people who had a form of humanitarian relief known as Temporary Protected Status, which allows beneficiaries to legally live and work in the United States, marking the latest in a string of moves that directly impact employers.

"The TPS push has been really big," said Jennie Murray, president and CEO of the National Immigration Forum. "That's really unsettling for business and the economy."

Haitians, for example, tend to be concentrated in industries such as elder care and manufacturing, while Salvadorans at risk of losing TPS are more likely to work in construction.

Murray stressed that employers want to work with the administration and comply with its demands but also can't have their workforce decimated overnight without a plan.

Immigration hardliners argue that the American workforce should be prioritized — which industry groups largely echo, with the caveat it takes time to build toward that — and that there needs to be a larger crackdown on employers through worksite enforcement.

"I'm not naïve enough to believe that it would be politically and logistically possible to raid every factory and farm in the United States in the next few weeks and deport everyone that's there," said Simon Hankinson, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "But worksite enforcement has to be part of the overall strategy for it to be successful."

It can take months, if not years, to prepare for a worksite operation, which is often based on an ongoing criminal investigation. ICE Homeland Security Investigations will generally serve notice of intent to audit a company's immigration paperwork; perform that audit; and, if issues arise, kick off a criminal investigation.


An agent passes meat being prepared during a raid by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement at a Glenn Valley Foods meat production plant in Omaha, Nebraska, on June 10, 2025 in a still image taken from a video. - US Immigration and Customs Enf/Reuters

White House border czar Tom Homan has publicly said he expects HSI to do more of it.

"It's been made clear they're going to do this," he said at an event hosted by the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for reduced immigration.
'Chaotic' for construction industry

Trump pledged to bring down home prices and create more housing. But for more than a year, the nation's homebuilders have told administration officials that their immigration policies keep that from happening.

The residential construction industry is short between 200,000 and 400,000 workers, Tobin said. That comes after decades of underinvestment in skilled trades and technical jobs, all while older workers weren't backfilled by younger Americans. The result: foreign-born workers fill the gaps.

Foreign-born workers made up more than a quarter of the construction workforce in 2024, a record high, according to NAHB data. The share is even higher among certain trades: more than half of drywall and ceiling installers, plasterers, roofers, painters and flooring installers are immigrants.

Trump's immigration agenda wasn't a surprise, Tobin said. But that hasn't stopped builders from pointing out tensions with other policy goals. The cost of building, and ultimately selling, a home depends on land prices, supply chains and materials costs — and having enough labor to keep the job moving.

"The more we squeeze labor, the more we're going to increase home prices," Tobin said.

The construction industry is grappling with multiple immigration enforcement actions, including the expiration of TPS.

"It's been chaotic," Associated Builders and Contractors president and CEO Michael Bellaman told CNN. "When employers have people who have been here a number of years, like a couple decades, and they've been productive, they know them well and want to do right by them, but options are limited."


Homes under construction in Cypress, Texas, on August 3. - Mark Felix/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Tobin and Bellaman said their organizations have raised the issue with the White House, and at Labor and DHS. Homebuilders from across the country also visited Capitol Hill during a recent conference, also visited Capitol Hill during a recent conference, Tobin said. Much of their frustration stems from going days without crews showing up, since they fear their sites will be raided next.

"We hear from our members routinely, and it seems like over the last couple of months, those voices have become louder," Tobin said.

One of the key issues for general contractors is the administration's approach to people who have temporary permissions to live and work in the US, including those who are beneficiaries of TPS or seeking asylum, according to Brian Turmail, vice president of Association & Industry Image at Associated General Contractors of America.

Employers will ensure that their workforce is in status one week and then, the next week, learn that they lost their permissions because they were stripped by the administration, he said.

"All of these enforcement activities are happening at a time where there's at least one segment of the industry going full gas and it's hard to find labor and we don't have a good pipeline to replace the labor that we currently have," Turmail said, citing the demand for data centers.

Republicans divided over solutions

Some Republicans viewed the dramatic drop in unlawful crossings at the US southern border as an opportunity to introduce legislation solving for the workforce challenges faced by agriculture, which has struggled to get access to worker visas for sectors that need labor year around.

In a late July letter to the secretaries of Labor, State, and Homeland Security, GOP lawmakers raised concerns regarding the H-2A agricultural guest worker program, which allows foreign nationals to fill seasonal jobs, and urged action to "address growing processing delays, regulatory imbalances, and structural barriers that are threatening the program's effectiveness for agricultural producers across the United States."

Among the signers was House Committee on Agriculture Chairman G.T. Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican, who introduced a farm bill that proposes a path to temporary legal status for some undocumented farmworkers.

"Fixing the H-2A program is the missing piece and necessary for broader enforcement to be effective," a House agriculture committee aide told CNN. "We can't be constantly balancing protecting our laws and protecting our food security."

"We don't want there to be a bullseye on agriculture's back. That's the position ag is in right now because they don't have a legal alternative to step in and fill in the void," the aide said.

The bill, however, sparked backlash from immigration hawks in the GOP, including the House Freedom Caucus.

But Trump has previously acknowledged the challenges in the agriculture industry and the administration has tried to make some inroads to extend the program to sectors who have been unable to access H-2A visas, like dairy.

"The biggest thing with dairy and what's unique with dairy is cows have to be milked 365 days a year and multiple shifts during the day… If workers were to disappear, those cows still need to be milked. You have to be able to move the milk. There are animal concerns, there are economic concerns," Trey Forsyth, vice president of government and regulatory affairs at the National Milk Producers Federation.

"It affects access to dairy products, and cost of dairy products flows all the way through the supply chain to consumers" Forysth said.

CNN's Rachel Siegel contributed to this report.







Trump Voter Faces Intense Online Mockery After Admitting ‘Regret’ As Haitian TPS Removal Ruins His Businesses

Favour Adegoke
Mon, August 10, 2026 
THE BLAST


Aaron Schwartz - Pool via CNP / MEGAAaron Schwartz - Pool via CNP / MEGA

Key takeaways
The Trump administration officially ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians in America, leading to fears of deportation and impacting businesses like Chef Creole in Miami.


A Donald Trump voter has become the subject of heavy scrutiny after revealing that his restaurant, which serves Haitian cuisine, is suffering due to the president's actions.

In candid remarks made during an interview, the businessman shared that he might have to close down two stores due to the billionaire politician's latest move to cancel TPS protections for Haitian migrants in America.

The comments have led to major mockery of the Donald Trump voter, who also admitted he regrets supporting the president after believing having him in power would be great for businesses.

Trump Voter Says He Is About To Lose His 'Future' In The Hospitality Business

The Trump administration officially stripped Haitians in America of humanitarian protections that allowed them to live and work legally while in the US.

The move was confirmed on August 5, when US District Judge Ana Reyes revealed that her order, which prevented the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from removing Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti, had lapsed.

This means that now, Haitians in the US are at risk of being arrested and deported back to their home country, with some businesses already being impacted by this reality.

In a recent interview, Wilkinson Sejour, the owner of the Miami restaurant Chef Creole, lamented the move by the Trump administration, stating that it has severely affected his livelihood due to fears that his establishment might become a target for ICE raids.

"The end of TPS for me means that my future in the hospitality business is almost going to be non-existent," Sejour said, per reports.

The chef, who has been in business for over 34 years, with a booming clientele, shared that he had lost his entire management team in seven locations due to the removal of TPS and may be forced to shut down two of his stores, as customers desert the area out of fear.

The Restaurant Owner 'Regrets' Voting For The President


On Sunday, August 2, officers with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement took a man on a scooter into custody right outside Sejour's restaurant in Little Haiti

The owner of the iconic Miami establishment explained that the highly visible arrest instantly triggered panic.

False rumors of an active restaurant raid spread rapidly through the neighborhood, heavily intensifying the atmosphere of fear and uncertainty already gripping the local immigrant community.

When asked what he would say to Trump, whom he admitted to voting for in the 2024 election, Sejour responded by revealing why he voted for the politician, noting that it was due to Trump's business experience.

"He sold to me that he is a businessman and that he would be making business decisions," he stated.

The interviewer then asked Sejour if he "regrets" his vote, to which he responded, "Yes, I do."


The Restaurant Owner Came Under Heavy Scrutiny Online For His Remorseful Remarks

Despite how remorseful Sejour sounded, critics online slammed the businessman for voting for Trump.

Many directly accused him of contributing to the unrest and fear in his community, especially after Trump infamously accused Haitians of eating cats and dogs during his 2024 presidential campaign.

One critic stated, "Typical Trump voter…when it impacts them, then they have concerns. But f-ck everyone else."

"Trump said Haitians were eating the cats and dogs. What was this guy thinking?" another asked in bewilderment.

A third person wrote, "And his dumb -ss is getting exactly what he voted for. And note the regret is only because it affected his business not the Nazi tactics of ICE that has resulted in deaths of innocent people."

"I don't live far from one of his locations; in fact, I was there a few days ago," another critic began. "I have several Haitian friends, and my wife is Haitian. I'm not eating there again. Voting for someone who ended TPS for the very community his restaurant serves isn't something I can look past."


Trump Voter Pleads For Fiancée's Release After ICE Arrest

Chef Sejour is just one of many Trump voters whose lives the politician's actions have negatively impacted since the beginning of his second term as president.

In another development, Texas businessman and lifelong Republican John Gannon shared that he deeply regrets voting for Trump after ICE officers took his fiancée.

The 75-year-old made the confession in an interview with CBS News, sharing that his plans to marry Yasmin Suarez Reyes, 45, had been ruined after her arrest in July while at Houston's international airport.

"I voted for Trump," he admitted. "They are picking up law-abiding citizens. They're destroying families, jobs."

When asked to share what he would say to Trump if given the opportunity, Gannon noted that he would confront the president by asking, "What are you doing?"

He clarified his stance by explaining that while he supports strict law enforcement, the government must distinguish between dangerous individuals and everyday working citizens.

"Go after the criminals," Gannon continued. "We're all for that. But leave the mom and pops and the kids alone. Man, he's destroying families."


The Trump Voter Was Mocked Online For His Comments About His Fiancée's ICE Arrest

Just like Sejour, Gannon has also received his fair share of online mockery for his revelations, with many going as far as scrutinizing his relationship with a much younger woman.

One individual on X wrote, "Another example of a Republican who was happy to vote for a man who promised mass deportations as long as it didn't impact him. He likely dgaf about any of the horrendous ICE-related cases involving thousands of migrants & protesters. Sorry, but he gets no sympathy from me."


A second critic wrote, "Entitlement and privilege ooze from this guy. He thinks he's better than everyone else and should not be affected by the politicians and policies he supported. This is MAGA."


Sunday, August 09, 2026

The U.S. Farm Bill Is a Health Bill

It cannot be cut into pieces without harming land and people.



The sun beams through a large cloud over farmland in South Dakota, USA.
(Photo by Getty Images)
Lorette Picciano
Aug 09, 2026
Common Dreams

Wanìshi means thank you in the Lenape language. This is the lyrical word we recently had the privilege of learning from a principal emissary from the Piscataway Indian Nation, and experiencing together. Wanìshi for the quiet moments between hard conversations and watching sunsets, where we shared in the spirit of collaboration, together with 18 other thinkers and doers who are deeply troubled by the trajectory of public agriculture policy, and its historically principal vehicle, the Farm Bill.

We embraced and shared in this collaborative mindset over the three days we spent with the America the Beautiful for All Coalition’s Legacy Lands workgroup in Maryland. The Farm Bill was one of the issues we discussed. A bill currently being treated by politicians as technical, as boring, as someone else’s problem. When in our realities, it is none of those things. The Farm Bill decides who eats and who doesn’t. It decides who is healthy and whose health is negotiable.

Between us, we have spent a combined five decades serving the communities this bill affects: rural families losing food, farmworkers losing protections, Black farmers losing land, tribal nations losing voice. So at that convening, and with this piece, we are expressing plainly a reality every farmer, rancher, and all of us who steward land intimately know. That land is a body and must be nourished. That we cannot cut it into fundable pieces and expect the pieces to bleed separately. The Farm Bill is a health bill. It cannot be cut into pieces without harming land and people. We do not view the content of the draft as a public health crisis because we have been trained to view it as agricultural policy. But it is, in fact, a public health crisis, and that crisis has a physical address: every community where conservation funding has been cut and every family living downstream of the farms and lands that lost it.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed on the Fourth of July last year, cut $187 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). More than 4.5 million people have lost their food assistance since then. In rural counties where the nearest grocery store is a 40-minute drive and the nearest doctor is farther, losing SNAP is not a policy change. It is a sentence. It means a child eating less, and then eating worse, and then showing up in an emergency room that is itself understaffed and underfunded. The Senate Farm Bill draft does not restore a single dollar.

That land is a body and must be nourished. That we cannot cut it into fundable pieces and expect the pieces to bleed separately. The Farm Bill is a health bill. It cannot be cut into pieces without harming land and people.

Both versions of the new bill cut funding for the conservation programs that keep farmland productive and water clean. The Senate draft alone slashes nearly $2 billion from EQIP, the program that helps small farmers put cover crops in, manage nutrients, and protect water. When those programs shrink, the runoff increases. Babies, adults, pets, and wildlife in the communities downstream all drink that water.

The agency responsible for delivering conservation to farmers is disappearing. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) lost nearly a quarter of its staff in one year. One hundred and forty-one counties went from having NRCS employees to having none. These were the people who helped farmers manage nutrients, reduce fertilizer runoff, and protect water. In their absence, nitrate from agricultural runoff enters rural drinking water unchecked. Research links nitrate contamination to colorectal cancer, thyroid disease, and birth defects in newborns, at levels below what the Environmental Protection Agency considers safe. The communities drinking that water are the same small rural towns that just lost their NRCS offices. A beginning farmer in southern Georgia or a small rancher in northern New Mexico picks up the phone and no one answers. Their neighbors downstream drink what runs off the fields no one is helping them manage.

For Latino communities across the rural West, acequias, the community irrigation systems that have sustained families for centuries, depend on the conservation programs this bill is cutting. A farmer in the San Luis Valley who has irrigated land the way her family has for six generations does not experience a conservation cut as a line item. She experiences it as a ditch that doesn’t flow, a garden that doesn’t grow, a family that buys what it used to harvest.

Black families once farmed 16 million acres in this country. Today they hold barely over 1%. Heirs’ property, land passed down without clear title, is one of the mechanisms through which that loss continues: A single partition sale can erase a century of family ownership in an afternoon. The families who lose their land don’t just lose wealth. They lose the foundation for food sovereignty, the one asset that could have fed a family, a neighborhood, a generation. A deed problem becomes a health problem, passed down the same way the land was supposed to be.

As we watch this Farm Bill, we carry with us the word our Piscataway colleague shared. Wanìshi. Thank you. We offer it now in the spirit of collaboration.

We will offer it again, in the spirit of gratitude, when Congress writes this bill for all of us.

We are waiting.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Kenya Crumel
Kenya Crumel is the co-lead of the Legacy Lands Workgroup at the America the Beautiful for All Coalition and the director of the Black Land and Power Workgroup at the National Black Food & Justice Alliance.
Full Bio >

Lorette Picciano
Lorette Picciano is the executive director of the Rural Coalition.
Full Bio >

The Forthcoming Migration Storm


 August 7, 2026

Image by Sébastien Goldberg.

Climate change is the force behind the greatest migration storm of all time. It will be 500,000,000 or maybe 2,000,000,000 nobody knows for sure how many but as climate change worsens, the estimates go up. Scientific studies run the gamut of up to a couple billion homeless wandering the planet, forlornly looking for a home over upcoming decades.

This is the subject of Josh Fox’s newest film The Welcome Table, 2h 11min, HBO Documentary Films, June 2026. Fox is best known for his Oscar-nominated, Emmy-winning 2010 documentary Gasland.

Decider, the pop culture web site for New York Post reviews “Stream it or Skip it” rates The Welcome Table “Stream it” … “A Striking and Memorable Documentary About People Displaced by Climate Change.”

The film is direct and to the point: “One out of every three people is forecast to leave home due to climate change. The greatest mass migration in human history is upon us. Governments know this is coming. They’re building walls and detention centers. Walls stand for racism, nationalism, fascism, dividing society into unequal separate sides. Walls build misunderstanding.”

Climate change impacts us all because in a very real sense, we’ve all left home, migrated without really knowing it. We’ve seemingly moved to a climate-changed planet. This is now home, a different planet, very different from any we’ve lived on. This is the general view of Josh Fox’s intriguing documentary.

Migrant thoughts: “What tells us we’re welcome? What is home?” serve as opening statements for what’s lost too easily, forgotten so soon. “Everything is changing. The steadiness that this world civilization is based upon is about to evaporate. The climate is changing beyond anything imaginable.”

Early in the film, a long shot of a lengthy wooden table in a green field at Bywater Levee, New Orleans is the testimonial spot for people to tell true-life stories. People (strangers) from every continent displaced by climate change meet for the first time to tell their stories at this long wooden table on a grassy knoll, wondering: “Where is home now?”

Husband-and-wife fire survivors from Paradise, California (2018). The massive fire consumed the equivalent of 800 football fields per minute, not per hour, but per minute! Eighty-five people caught in the inferno, died, real-life testament to an unforgiving climate that’s drier and hotter than ever before in human history. This is the current epitome of global warming’s destructiveness. Nothing is normal now.

Throughout the world, ‘common wildfires’ have evolved into ‘climate infernos’ that are foreign to human experience, as 22,000 displaced Paradise residents became modern-day refugees, overnight. Fires & storms everywhere and Rain Bombs coming out of the sky in Brazil kill 50 people, displace unknown numbers, landslides of mud erupt, forcing homeless migrants to foreign shores as hometowns are buried.

The unforgiving climate, in part, occurs because the planet’s atmosphere is much wetter than before. Warm air holds more water vapor, until suddenly excessive and erupting, cascading all at once, landslides of mud, uprooting trees, displacing boulders, burying entire towns. Ordinary families, regular citizens forced to leave, to migrate.

Throughout South America and Central America climate change has destabilized every aspect of life. It’s either too hot with burned-out agriculture or too wet with torrential flash floods. People migrate internally within their own countries or north to the U.S., towards The Wall, but: “Demagogues have always divided us into who was welcomed and into who was not. And to do that, they divide us into who is human and who is not.” Trump rally recording: “Animals. These are animals. They are coming into our country. They are not people… take a look at the death and destruction that’s been caused by people coming into this country, caused by people that shouldn’t be here.”

In 2019 the Trump administration announced a new policy for migrants who were legally seeking asylum. Families with young children would be separated, thrown into detention camps. The policy was a clear violation of international law and considered to be child abuse.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Society challenged blatant human disrespect in 1948 the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the UN, and a brand-new kind of human being was born. A human being with rights, rights to go anywhere in the world, rights to leave a country. Violating these rights is a crime against humanity. This declaration was the legacy of WWII when fascism branded non-whites enemies of the state, never again.

In 1951 a new definition and protocol was adopted to protect migrants, aka: Status of Refugees. A refugee was defined as any person who fears being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, social status or politics. And refugees can apply for asylum anywhere in the world simply by crossing a border. But climate change is not included in these rights. The definition of refugee does not include climate change as a cause for flight. Climate change did not exist in 1951. As such, our legal framework is breaking down in the face of a climate that’s breaking down. In other words: “If the climate throws you across the border, if it destroys your home, despite y0ur right to move, you have no legal status and you cannot declare asylum.”

Calabrian Coast, Italy (2023)

Josh Fox’s family roots extend to the Calabrian Coast, Italy that became largely deserted in the early 1900s, a collapsed economy, as Italians migrated to NYC to find livelihood. Arriving at NYC, they were intimidated by a huge backlash against Italian migrants. Cartoons in NY magazines depicted Italians as rats with knives in their teeth, spreading socialism, communism, anarchy at our doorstep. Cartoons in NY magazines even portrayed “a wall” to restrict immigration. It’s the same racism, different century, different race. Some things never change; name-calling is easy to do but eventually sinks into lowly filthy gutters with a stench that sticks.

Mediterranean Sea Wall

The EU essentially uses the Mediterranean Sea as a wall. The Italian military supplies Libya with warships to patrol migrant rafts, known as the Libyan Coast Guard. They shoot at rafts full of migrants from Africa, or they return them to Libya where people are enslaved, raped or extorted for money, tortured and thrown into arbitrary detention. The world’s media does not see this.

In opposition to the Libyan Coast Guard, SOS Mediterranean is an NGO that plucks migrants out of the sea. Nevertheless, according to unofficial records up to 40,000 migrants have likely drowned at sea.

Chris Obuheyi left his home in Nigeria to seek safer shores, ending up in a small boat across the Mediterranean. He was one of the lucky ones, almost every person in the rubber raft drowned; he tells a horrifying story of capture, near death, but he ended up in Sicily and has since become a famous musician. Nigeria is a country that was, and is, overcome with climate-induced massive flooding and/or scorching heat that is worse than the iron grip of Boko Haram, an Islamist terrorist group that terrorizes the countryside. Chris escaped prison following detention by the Libyan Coast Guard.

There is a Better Way

In southern Italy there are many empty towns, empty houses, empty buildings. Yet, the migrants are shut out of Italy the same way the Italians were shut out of NYC 100 years ago. But thankfully, there are brave people who embrace humanity and go against the grain. Mimmo Lucano, mayor of Riace, Italy has a different view, turning Italian migration policy on its head. “Mimmo Lucano took the fear of migrants and turned it into love.” Riace opened its doors to refugees from across the world, creating an immigrant economy that bustles with success. Mimmo’s name and image “shot into worldwide popularity.”

Mimmo Lucano is “one of the top leaders in the world.” (Forbes Magazine).

Oops, Mimmo was too generous: The government of Italy charged Mimmo with criminal conspiracy to facilitate illegal immigration and misappropriation of public property, facing 14 years in jail, realized when the Fox film crew first arrived in Italy. PM Salvini helped to escalate the hysteria with Italian mass media, putting out negative stories, blaming immigrants for every problem in Italy. (footnote: An Italian court has banned Mayor Mimmo Lucano from office, as of April 29, 2026)

A Broken Climate System at 1.5C

Scientists at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 10 years ago, saw “that every fraction of a degree was dangerous… they saw 127 different impacts (starting at 1:11:35 in the film) of different types of catastrophes” unless immediate action was taken to cut fossil fuel emissions by 50% within 15 years.

The United States canceled and withdrew from the Paris agreement to cut emissions on January 7, 2026, via executive order.

Meanwhile, “if we go over 1.5C, all hell breaks loose… even though 200 nations pledged, the pledges were not observed, and emissions went through the roof. We never burned this much, this fast. Back in Paris 2015 scientists thought we would not exceed 1.5C above pre-industrial before 2050, but they were 25 years off. We breached it in 2025.” Oops!

Original Home of Humanity Dry as a Bone

Puriti Gaku from Kenya, the original home of all humanity, was at the table. But now its rivers have run dry. Turkana of East Africa is the original human civilization; 150,000 years ago, they spread out all over the globe. They lived as pastoralist for thousands of years. Puriti Gaku works at Impact Kenya. The film crew visited Arot’s village, empty straw houses; they’ve all gone away. All their animals died, taken by severe drought. The one water well nearly empty, intermittent water barely trickles. Twenty million people in this region of Kenya suffer from food insecurity. These are the people who did not cause climate change but feel its worst impact.

Migrants understand the problem: “There is a very clear group of people and institutions and powers in this world that are trying to convince humanity that we can save the planet without changing the power imbalances of the world.”

It won’t happen.

Meanwhile, reality finds a world immersed in risks coming full force so much faster than ever thought possible.

A charade that pretends to fix climate change is highlighted every year, as all the nations of the world, except for a handful, meet for two weeks at UN Conference of the Parties (COP) with 20,000 to 50,000 attendees, well-attended by oil and gas interests and climate scientists and government bureaucrats, ongoing for the past 30 years. The principal topic of discussion is climate change.

After 30 years of intense meetings to fix climate change, it is worse than ever. Global fossil fuel emissions, like CO2, the primary cause of global warming, have never been so high. And climate change, like a wild stallion, has never been so threatening. Alas, every continent, except Antarctica, is burning.

From afar, distant screams of “stop fossil fuels now” by hundreds of polar scientists fade away into neverland.

COP 31 is scheduled for November 9-20 at the Expo Center in Antalya, Turkey, expecting 20,000-40,000 official delegates and other observers, and oh yes, several prime ministers, presidents, heads of state, and senior politicos attend for photo ops.

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com.


 Opinion

How grief made Archbishop García-Siller a prophetic voice on immigration

(RNS) — Since Pope Leo XIV spoke against the mass detention of immigrants last year, the American Catholic hierarchy has begun to move in new ways. García-Siller's new pastoral letter accelerates that shift.
The archbishop of San Antonio, Gustavo García-Siller, comforts families outside the Civic Center after a deadly school shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, May 24, 2022. (AP Photo/Dario Lopez-Mills)


(RNS) — On May 24, 2022, San Antonio Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller sat with parents in Uvalde, Texas. Their children were dead — 19 of them. Most were Mexican-American, as the city sits 50 miles from the U.S.-Mexico border. People there believed their children would be safe. But a school shooting that day marked another massacre in a strip of land with a long historical legacy of violence against those of Mexican descent.

Thirty-six days later, on June 27, García-Siller stood in San Antonio outside a crime scene where 53 bodies lay in a tractor trailer. In pursuit of the American dream, the migrants had suffocated in metal darkness. In five weeks, he had moved between two forms of American erasure: the sudden obliteration of childhood via school shootings and the slow suffocation of people who migrate. Both communities had been abandoned. Both experiences would stay with him.

These griefs, along with a series of poignant autobiographical details unique for a public declaration from a Catholic bishop, helped to forge García-Siller’s new pastoral letter, “We Will Come to You.” They sit beneath every word.

Born in San Luis Potosí, Mexico, when the Cristero War was very much a living memory, García-Siller, now 69, arrived in the United States at 23, with no return date. He learned early what displacement meant. Years later, as a priest, he would walk alongside farmworkers in California who worked bent over in fields and who slept in farmhouse garages to avoid being deported. As a Chicago auxiliary bishop, he learned the lessons of community organizing and boarded deportation buses to hand out prayer cards.

But experiencing the immediate aftermath of Uvalde and the tractor trailer deaths completed a formation that had begun with his own exile from his home country as a missionary, as he describes in his letter. By then, he fully understood what it meant to find oneself in a moral wreckage he did not create. He understood staying.

Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller speaks at Mission San Juan Capistrano, May 4, 2021, in San Antonio. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

Years later, against a surge in recent migrant deaths — Physicians for Human Rights has documented at least 52 in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody since the beginning of the Trump administration as of June, and others have been documented since — fathers in Texas and Maine shot during traffic stops, the ordinary machinery of immigration enforcement grinding toward its quota — García-Siller has written a letter of uncommon clarity as well as personal vulnerability. Of moral destruction he has seen much, and it shows in how he writes.

The letter substantively addresses the issue of immigration detention, now metastasizing throughout the country. For García-Siller, detention is not policy failure. Sustained by private profit, it is design. He notes that a Senate investigation documents over 1,000 credible reports or serious abuses in detention centers since January 2025. Seventy-three percent of those detained have never been convicted of anything, according to the Cato Institute.

He quotes a 9-year-old Colombian girl held for 113 days, who wrote on a piece of paper: “I am not happy. Get me out.” Seven words. The archbishop does not quote her to move us, but because she is real. She existed in that cage, and her words are the only testimony of that horrible reality some people will never leave behind.



He also names what others will not: the racial architecture underneath the campaign of mass detention and deportation. “This system’s brokenness is not merely policy failure,” he writes.  ” … A system in which racial disparity is so deeply embedded cannot deliver justice without honest reform.” He does not say every officer acts from hatred. He says the system itself is soaked in it. If anyone in the church has known this and looked away, he says that ends now: “The Church must confront the truth and name these injustices for what they are.”

The theological core of the letter is the spirituality of the cross. Human tragedy met with love becomes where God lives. It is a lens García-Siller describes looking through since childhood — learned from nuns during primary school, alongside undocumented farmworkers, on buses filled with those bound for deportation, in the cells of detention centers, with crying parents in Uvalde. He quotes border theologian Monsignor Arturo Bañuelas: “Jesus is at the border; today He is crucified in the poor.” The archbishop does not explain this. He names it. He expects us to understand.

FILE – Detainees at ICE’s Eloy Detention Center in Eloy, Ariz. (Photo by Charles Reed/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

Since Pope Leo XIV spoke against the mass detention of immigrants last year, the American hierarchy has begun to move in new ways. Bishops in El Paso and Cheyenne have named the current mass deportation campaign for what it is: grave moral evil. Bishop Bruce Lewandowski chartered a bus from Providence, Rhode Island, to Washington, D.C. after ICE arrested a judge’s 16-year-old intern outside his office. The Bishop of Knoxville, James Mark Beckman, spoke out against a painful rise in family separations on the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe. Going outside the usual channels, a coalition of bishops opposed President Donald Trump’s enforcement expansion bill. The institutional church is waking.

García-Siller’s letter accelerates that shift. It offers a map that parallels his life experience: encounter with the reality of human suffering, then accompaniment, then organized advocacy, then lived solidarity. It is a model for what religious leadership looks like when silence becomes impossible.

The letter closes with Our Lady of Guadalupe — a woman who crossed borders, who appeared to the powerless, who knows the road of suffering. To those living in fear, she speaks: “Am I not here, I who am honored to be your mother?” García-Siller promises the same. You are not alone. The church will not be silent. We will come to you.

That promise sits heavy. It has been tested in Uvalde’s funeral homes and in that tractor trailer on Quintana Road. It has been tested in detention centers where children write their despair on paper. It will be tested again when ICE pulls someone over, when families wake to find breadwinners gone, when another community buries its dead.



García-Siller has written from the foot of the cross. His moral authority does not come from theology alone. It comes from standing where his people stood in grief. It comes from knowing what it feels like to be displaced, to have nowhere, to identify with those who are told your life does not matter.

“We Will Come to You” deserves to be read — for its integration of witness, memory, theology and pastoral specificity, as well as for its author’s story of vulnerability and growth. But read it also for what it reveals about an archbishop who allows us to see how suffering, when not numbed by privilege, becomes the ground of prophetic action. García-Siller calls the church beyond accompaniment to lived solidarity. To “primerear” — to go first, as Pope Francis asked. To become neighbor to the wounded.

His letter is a promise and a warning. We will come to you. Not with comfort. Not with the language that makes us feel better about ourselves. But with the willingness to stand in wreckage and say: Your dignity is not negotiable. Your life is not disposable. We will not look away.

Whether the church in the United States keeps that promise is up to us.

(Dylan Corbett is the executive director of the Hope Border Institute and member of the Vatican’s Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)

Spanish bishops, church officials condemn politicization of Ceuta migrant crisis

VATICAN CITY (RNS) — Spanish Catholic leaders and Caritas officials condemned the use of migrants as geopolitical leverage after tens of thousands crossed from Morocco into Ceuta, leaving scores dead and overwhelming the small Spanish territory in North Africa.
Migrants try to cross from Morocco into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta, Friday, July 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Antonio Sempere)


VATICAN CITY (RNS) — Catholic bishops and church charity officials in Spain this week condemned the politicizing of an immigration crisis after tens of thousands of migrants recently crossed the border from Morocco to the Spanish city of Ceuta in North Africa.

“Biopolitics is key to current global power. Life is toyed with, and people — their dreams, hunger, sexuality, and data — are exploited for the sake of profit and power,” Archbishop Luis Argüello of Valladolid, president of the Spanish Episcopal Conference, wrote in Spanish in an Aug. 2 post on X.

He described the “invasion of Ceuta” as a “test,” where “demography is a weapon.”

A similar warning came from Bishop Xabier Gómez García, the Spanish bishops’ point person on migration and intercultural ministry in Catalonia, Spain. In a statement, he criticized “those who use human mobility as an instrument of political pressure” and “hybrid threats.”

These statements came amid mounting questions from politicians and lawmakers over whether Morocco failed to enforce appropriate border controls to pressure Spain and the European Union. The regional president of Ceuta, Juan Jesús Vivas, claimed that residents believe the influx was “if not orchestrated, at least encouraged or permitted by Morocco.” Meanwhile, European Commissioner for Migration Magnus Brunner said the events at Ceuta highlight the fragility of Europe’s border patrol when it relies too heavily on neighboring countries.

Morocco has denied responsibility, and no public evidence has established that the country orchestrated the influx.

Spain has had a welcoming immigration policy compared to other EU nations and in June gave over 1 million undocumented immigrants a one-year renewable work and residence permit. Some news reports suggest that widely shared social media posts announced that the border was open and they would be welcomed in Spain.

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said he views the events at Ceuta as a “violation of Spain’s territorial integrity.” He accused human trafficking networks of encouraging people to make the crossing and thanked Morocco for its cooperation. Italy reintroduced border checks on arrivals from Spain, while Finland and Denmark called for Spain’s temporary suspension from the Schengen free-movement area. Twenty-two of the EU’s 27 countries signed a letter calling for an emergency meeting following the Ceuta crisis.

Caritas Spain, the Catholic Church’s charitable organization, backed the bishops’ assessment and issued a more explicit warning about the geopolitical use of migration.

“We condemn the use of migrants as tools in the service of political or strategic interests and the use of demographic pressure as a geopolitical weapon,” said Sònia Martínez Albiñana, a Caritas lawyer specializing in migrants’ rights, asylum and access to government services, in a written responses to Religion News Service.

Caritas urged the international community and political leaders “to promote solutions based on protecting human rights, cooperation among countries and within the European Union, respect for the law and the establishment of safe pathways for migration,” she wrote.

Martínez Albiñana noted that “the international conditions needed to make that possible do not exist.”



She mentioned that the legal frameworks in Europe for providing safe and legal pathways for migrants in need of protection “are inadequate.” The recent European Pact on Migration and Asylum, which speeds up asylum screening and returns while requiring member states to share responsibility for migrants, risks compromising international forms of protection, she added.

The majority of the estimated 70,000 immigrants crossing the border from Morocco to Ceuta were young men, entering through border gates and crossing on foot and by swimming around the coastal barriers. But there were also a sizable number of women and children as well as immigrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, according to Caritas. 

The influx, which includes about 1,100 unaccompanied minors, overwhelmed the small Northern African city of roughly 85,000 residents.

“We are particularly concerned about unaccompanied children,” Martínez Albiñana said, adding that Caritas has prioritized providing “basic care, accompaniment, guidance, a listening ear” to migrants. She added that the local dioceses donated the Sunday collections from all its parishes to the diocesan migration office to help care for and receive people affected by the crisis.

Approximately 100 people died during the mass crossing, according to Vivas, who also said less than 5,000 migrants remain in Ceuta after most returned to Morocco.

Martínez Albiñana said that while Caritas has no concrete data or evidence showing that rights have been violated, she warned that legal safeguards are at risk under current chaotic conditions in Ceuta.

Pope Leo XIV visited Spain in June, where he stressed the importance of welcoming and promoting immigrants while understanding the challenges migration poses to nations. He issued an appeal on Sunday (Aug. 2) to seek common solutions.

“I am following with concern the alarming situation in Ceuta,” he said, asking that “solutions may be found to bring peace, stability and justice.”



Monoskop.org

https://monoskop.org/images/9/95/Hardt_Michael_Negri_Antonio_Empire.pdf

4.3 The Multitude against Empire. 393. Notes. 415. Index. 473. Page 11. PREFACE. Empire is materializing before our very eyes. Over the past several decades, as ...

Rebels-library.org

http://rebels-library.org/files/multitude.pdf

Page 1. MULTITUDE. WAR AND DEMOCRACY. IN THE AGE OF EMPIRE. MICHAEL HARDT ... Empire calls on war for its legitimation, the multitude calls on democracy as its ...


Newleftreview.org

https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii120/articles/empire-twenty-years-on.pdf

Just as today's. Empire was formed in response to the insurgencies of the multitudes from below, so too, potentially, it could fall to them, as long as those.