Wednesday, May 07, 2025

 

T. rex’s direct ancestor crossed from Asia to North America


University College London
Evolution following the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum 

image: 

The piece illustrates the disparity of the Northern and Southern hemisphere’s evolution of terrestrial Cretaceous faunas after the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum. On the left, End Cretaceous Southern Hemisphere (Western Gondwana) became dominated by Megaraptorids theropods and titanosaur sauropods. The centre of the piece summarises the extinction event of terrestrial fauna at the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum, where the apex predators the carcharodontosaurids allosaurs went extinct and tyrannosauroids (including megaraptoran and the ancestors of Tyrannosaurus rex) were small. On the right, the end Cretaceous Northern Hemisphere fauna dominated by Tyrannosaurids (such as Tyrannosaurus rex), hadrosaurs and ceratopsian ornithischian dinosaurs. The environment also became more mesic represented by the landscape compared to the more semi-arid seasonal environment earlier in the Cretaceous. 

view more 

Credit: Pedro Salas and Sergey Krasovskiy




Tyrannosaurus rex evolved in North America, but its direct ancestor came from Asia, crossing a land bridge connecting the continents more than 70 million years ago, according to a new study led by UCL researchers.

The study, published in Royal Society Open Science, also found that the rapid growth in size of tyrannosaurids (the group that included the T. rex) as well as a closely related group called megaraptors coincided with a cooling of the global climate following a peak in temperatures 92 million years ago.

This suggests T. rex and its cousins might have been better suited to cooler climates than other dinosaur groups at the time, perhaps due to having feathers or a more warm-blooded physiology.

The international team involved researchers from the universities of Oxford, Pittsburgh, Aberdeen, Arizona, Anglia Ruskin, Oklahoma and Wyoming.

Lead author Cassius Morrison, a PhD student at UCL Earth Sciences, said: “The geographic origin of T. rex is the subject of fierce debate. Palaeontologists have been divided over whether its ancestor came from Asia or North America.

“Our modelling suggests the ‘grandparents’ of T. rex likely came to North America from Asia, crossing the Bering Strait between what is now Siberia and Alaska.

“This is in line with past research finding that the T. rex was more closely related to Asian cousins such as the Tarbosaurus than to North American relatives such as Daspletosaurus.

“Dozens of T. rex fossils have been unearthed in North America but our findings indicate that the fossils of T. rex’s direct ancestor may lie undiscovered still in Asia.”

The research team concluded that T rex. itself evolved in North America, specifically in Laramidia, the western half of the continent, where it was widely distributed.

They disagreed with conclusions published last year that a T. rex relative, Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis, found in New Mexico, predated T. rex by three to five million years – a finding that pointed to T. rex having North American ancestry. The team argued that this T. mcraeensis fossil was not reliably dated.

For the new study, the researchers explored how tyrannosaurids and their cousins the megaraptors moved around the globe. They used mathematical models drawing on fossils, dinosaurs’ evolutionary trees and the geography and climate of the time. Importantly, the models account for gaps in the fossil record, incorporating uncertainty into the calculations.

Megaraptors are regarded as the most mysterious of the large, meat-eating dinosaurs, as few megaraptor fossils have been found. In contrast to the T. rex, they evolved slender heads and arms as long as a person is tall, with claws up to 35cm (14in) long.

The researchers concluded that megaraptors were more widely distributed across the globe than previously thought, likely originating in Asia about 120 million years ago and spreading to Europe and then throughout the large southern landmass of Gondwana (including present-day Africa, South America and Antarctica).

This would mean megaraptors lived in parts of the world (Europe and Africa) where no megaraptor fossils have been found so far.

It may be that they evolved differently from their tyrannosaurid cousins, with killing claws rather than a powerful bite, because they hunted different prey. In southern Gondwana, they may have preyed on (juvenile) sauropods, whereas T. rex hunted Laramidian species such as Triceratops, Edmontosaurus and Ankylosaurus.

Both tyrannosaurids and megaraptors grew to gigantic sizes at broadly the same time, as the climate cooled following a peak in global temperatures known as the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum 92 million years ago. This rapid growth followed the extinction of other giant meat-eaters, carcharodontosaurids, which left a vacuum at the top of the food chain.

The researchers suggested that tyrannosaurs – both tyrannosaurids and megaraptors – may have been able to better exploit cooler temperatures than rival dinosaur groups.

At the end of the age of the dinosaurs, T. rex weighed up to nine tonnes (about the same as a very large African elephant or a light tank), while megaraptors reached lengths of 10 metres.

Co-author Charlie Scherer, an MSci Earth Sciences graduate and soon to be PhD student at UCL, and founder of UCL’s Palaeontology Society, said: “Our findings have shined a light on how the largest tyrannosaurs appeared in North and South America during the Cretaceous and how and why they grew so large by the end of the age of dinosaurs.

“They likely grew to such gigantic sizes to replace the equally giant carcharodontosaurid theropods that went extinct about 90 million years ago. This extinction likely removed the ecological barrier that prevented tyrannosaurs from growing to such sizes.”

Co-author Dr Mauro Aranciaga Rolando, from the Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Argentine Museum, Buenos Aires, Argentina, said: “At the beginning of their evolutionary history, around 120 million years ago, megaraptors were part of a widespread and diverse dinosaur fauna.

“As the Cretaceous period progressed and the continents that once formed Gondwana began to drift apart, these predators became increasingly specialised. This evolutionary shift led them to inhabit more specific environments.

“While in regions like Asia megaraptors were eventually replaced by tyrannosaurs, in areas such as Australia and Patagonia they evolved to become apex predators, dominating their ecosystems.”

 

Women with serious mental health conditions likely ill-equipped for menopause transition



New scoping review addresses knowledge gaps around the management of menopause symptoms for women living with a mental illness and spotlight the value of psychoeducation


The Menopause Society




CLEVELAND, Ohio (May 7, 2025)—Many women struggle to find resources to help manage their menopause symptoms. For women living with a serious mental illness, the need for additional support and education during the menopause transition is even greater. A new scoping review confirmed the paucity of research on this topic and suggested a need for more psychoeducation programs. Results of the study are published online today in Menopause, the journal of The Menopause Society.

Serious mental illnesses are a group of mental health conditions often characterized by their chronicity and severity of symptoms that lead to significant functional impairment. Although definitions may vary, conditions that are usually assessed include conditions such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, recurrent depression, severe anxiety and eating disorders, personality disorders, and posttraumatic stress disorder. These conditions may be associated with a range of poorer physical health outcomes and higher mortality rates, with a lack of proper healthcare being a contributing factor to poorer outcomes.

The menopause transition can be a time of increased risk of depression and anxiety symptoms in nonpsychiatric people. Despite major advances in education around the menopause transition, this period in a woman’s life can often be filled with frustration over the lack of resources. For women also struggling with a mental health problem, the questions are often more numerous and the frustration more debilitating.

Although there has been considerable interest in understanding the effect of the menopause transition on mental health problems overall, little research has been undertaken to assess the effect of menopause on those living with a diagnosed chronic mental health condition. Earlier research had suggested that women with compromised mental health were more likely to report more significant menopause symptoms as well as more exaggerated mental health problems. For example, a woman diagnosed with schizophrenia may have worse psychotic symptoms during the transition. Eating disorders may also worsen because of disturbances to body image during this transitional phase.

Despite the limited number of applicable studies identified, there seems to be consensus around the idea that women living with a serious mental health condition may be ill-equipped for the menopause transition. That is why the goal of this latest review was to assess the research literature regarding psychoeducation programs in the management of menopause symptoms for women living with a mental illness.

Study results are published in the article “Psychoeducation in the management of menopause symptoms for women living with a serious mental illness: a scoping review.”

“Overall, we have improved our understanding of the menopause transition and its potential effect on women’s well-being and overall functioning. However, this study is confirming what we know from other areas in medicine and public health—that we need to do a better job in providing persons with severe mental illnesses with the information, resources, and care they need to manage their health throughout their lifespans—including their midlife years,” says Dr. Claudio Soares, a psychiatrist and president of The Menopause Society.

For more information about menopause and healthy aging, visit www.menopause.org.

The Menopause Society (formerly The North American Menopause Society) is dedicated to empowering healthcare professionals and providing them with the tools and resources to improve the health of women during the menopause transition and beyond. As the leading authority on menopause since 1989, the nonprofit, multidisciplinary organization serves as the independent, evidence-based resource for healthcare professionals, researchers, the media, and the public and leads the conversation about improving women’s health and healthcare experiences. To learn more, visit menopause.org.


Cannabis-related hospital visits rising, often tied to mental health conditions: Study


CANNABIS PSYCHOSIS IS JUST PSYCHOSIS


Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs




PISCATAWAY, NJ – More people are landing in the hospital with cannabis-related problems—and for many, a mental health condition is the primary issue, according to a new study published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.

The study, conducted in Arizona, found that between 2016 and 2021, cannabis-related hospital visits across the state rose by 20%. Among those visits, one quarter ended up with a primary diagnosis of a mental health condition, including bipolar disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. That compared with only about 3% of visits unrelated to cannabis.

Overall, people with a cannabis-related hospital visit were nearly eight times as likely to have a primary diagnosis of a mental health disorder. And the link between the two grew stronger over the five-year study period.

The reasons for the rising rate of cannabis-related visits are unclear, according to lead researcher Madeline Meier, Ph.D., an associate professor of psychology at Arizona State University, in Tempe, Ariz.

But, she said, legalization of non-medical (recreational) cannabis use is not to blame: Arizona legalized non-medical use for adults in late 2020, with sales beginning in 2021—too late to explain the trends seen during the study period.

On the other hand, Meier said, medical use of cannabis was legal in Arizona throughout the study period. So it’s possible that easier access to the drug is partly responsible for the trends her team found. Meier noted that when states have less-restrictive policies on medical cannabis—such as making it available in dispensaries rather than pharmacies—that can make it easier for any adult to get the drug.

The findings also raise other key questions: Why do so many people with cannabis-related hospital visits have a mental health condition, and why is the connection between the two growing stronger over time?

“There are many possible explanations, and this study can’t address them,” Meier said. But based on other research, she said, one possibility is that cannabis use led to mental health conditions in some people. Another is that some people were using cannabis to treat mental health symptoms—and that tendency increased over time.

If that’s the case, Meier said, it points to a need for better public education. “I think it’s important for people to be aware that the science on using cannabis to treat mental health problems is really not there yet,” she said. “In fact, there is evidence suggesting that cannabis use can worsen mental health conditions, or even increase the risk of developing them.”

The study also found some interesting patterns related to age: Older adults (age 65 and up) showed a bigger jump in cannabis-related hospitalizations between 2016 and 2021, versus other adults. And the growing tendency for those hospitalizations to be linked to mental health conditions was most pronounced among older adults.

That’s not necessarily surprising, Meier said, given Baby Boomers’ permissive attitudes about cannabis use. But, she added, older adults may need particular education about the potential risks of using the drug—including the fact it is much more potent (and potentially intoxicating) these days, compared with the cannabis of decades ago.

-----
Meier, M. H., Hummel, H. M., & Miller, M. L. (2025). Trends in cannabis-related hospitalizations in Arizona from 2016–2021 and associations with mental health-related hospitalizations. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 83(3). https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.23-00379

 

 

Humans prefer to put more effort into empathizing with groups than with individuals



Study participants asked to choose whether to empathize with or describe people preferred to empathize with groups, despite finding it difficult and distressing



Frontiers




What makes us care about others? Scientists studying empathy have found that people are more likely to choose to empathize with groups rather than individuals, even though they find empathizing equally difficult and uncomfortable in both cases. The scientists suggest that the sight of groups of people could offer more context information which helps people decide whether to empathize, and therefore increases the chances that they choose to do so.  

“People’s willingness to empathize is different depending on who the target is: a single individual or a group of people,” said Dr Hajdi Moche of Linköping University, Sweden, lead author of the article in Frontiers in Psychology. “Specifically, people were more willing to empathize with a group than an individual, although empathizing was rated as more effortful and distressing compared to staying objective – for both the individual and the group.” 

What is empathy? 

The researchers defined empathy as understanding, feeling, and sharing in another’s world, while maintaining the understanding that it’s not the same as your world. Empathy can come at a price, whether it’s paid in time, money, or emotion: feeling others’ pain tends to be painful. They wanted to learn whether people were more likely to choose to pay this price when they were dealing with individuals or with groups. Although an experiment in the lab doesn’t equate directly to the choices someone might make in real life, understanding how people empathize differently with groups and individuals could help us understand the part that empathy plays in natural disasters or wars. 

To investigate this, the researchers recruited 296 participants to take part in an experiment called the Empathy Selection Task, which invites participants to choose between two decks of cards, one of which will ask them to empathize and one of which will ask them to remain objective. Their willingness to empathize is gauged by how often they choose the empathy deck.  

Pick a card 

Each participant underwent a two-block test – one block of pictures of individuals and one of groups. Each block had 20 different stock photos depicting a diverse range of people, with (as far as possible) neutral expressions and plain backgrounds. Participants were given the two decks and asked to choose a card from one of them. Then they were given a picture to react to, writing down three keywords that described either the feelings of the people in the images or their external appearance. After each block, participants were asked questions which aimed to understand their experience of performing the tasks. 

The scientists found that participants chose to avoid empathizing more often during the block of individual pictures, choosing to empathize 34% of the time on average. However, during the block of group pictures, they chose to empathize 53% of the time. Even though they found empathizing harder and more distressing than staying objective, participants chose to pay that price more often during the test of group images.  

“The task of trying to share the internal experiences of the other requires more effort, imagination, and understanding of what the person might feel compared to describing external features like hair color,” said Moche. “To share in the internal experiences might be especially hard when the information at hand is only a neutral facial expression without any body language or background context.” 

Choosing to care 

It’s possible that the group pictures, containing multiple people, both provide more context for participants to help them empathize and make describing feel more effortful, so that empathizing becomes easier by comparison – participants reported that describing groups was harder than describing individuals. Participants also rated their own effectiveness in empathizing with groups higher: this could have boosted their confidence and encouraged them to empathize.  

It’s also possible that the neutral facial expressions and lack of body language in the individual pictures made it harder to understand people’s feelings and discouraged people from choosing to try. Different facial expressions or different amounts of context information might affect the choices people make.      

“It would be interesting to test this further by directly pitting the individual and group against each other and letting participants choose which of these they would prefer to empathize with, and then in another round, which one they would prefer to stay objective in relation to,” concluded Moche. “In this way, we would have a direct comparison in willingness to empathize when the target is an individual versus a group of people.” 

 

Feat of ‘dung-gineering’ turns cow manure into one of world’s most used materials




University College London




The study, published in The Journal of Cleaner Production, describes the new ‘pressurised spinning’ innovation and its potential to create cellulose materials more cheaply and cleanly than some current manufacturing methods, using a waste product from the dairy farming industry, cow dung, as the raw material.

The advance is the first time that manufacturing-grade cellulose has been derived from animal waste and is a prime example of circular economy, which aims to minimise waste and pollution by reusing and repurposing resources wherever possible.

The researchers say that implementing the technology would be a win-win situation for manufacturers, dairy farmers and the environment.

Cellulose is one of the world’s most commonly used manufacturing materials. Found naturally in the cell walls of plants, it was first used to create synthetic materials in the mid-19th century, including the original material used in photographic film, celluloid.

Today it can be found in everything from cling film to surgical masks, paper products, textiles, foods and pharmaceuticals. Though it can be extracted organically, it is also often produced synthetically using toxic chemicals.

Pressurised spinning (or pressurised gyration) is a manufacturing technology that uses the forces of pressure and rotation simultaneously to spin fibres, beads, ribbons, meshes and films from a liquid jet of soft matter. The multiple award-winning technology was invented in 2013 by a team from UCL Mechanical Engineering led by Professor Mohan Edirisinghe.

Professor Edirisinghe, the senior author of the study, said: “Our initial question was whether it could be possible to extract the tiny fragments of cellulose present in cow manure, which is left over from the plants the animals have eaten, and fashion it into manufacturing-grade cellulose materials.

“Extracting the fragments from dung was relatively straightforward using mild chemical reactions and homogenisation, which we then turned into a liquid solution. But when we tried to turn the fragments into fibres using pressurised spinning technology, it didn’t work.

“By a process of trial and error, we figured out that using a horizontal rather than a vertical vessel containing surface nozzles and injecting the jet of liquid into still or flowing water caused cellulose fibres to form. We were then able to change the consistency of the liquid to create other forms, such as meshes, films and ribbons, each of which have different manufacturing applications.

“We’re still not quite sure why the process works, but the important thing is that it does. It will also be fairly easy to scale up using existing pressurised spinning technology, the vessels for which were designed and built in the UCL Mechanical Engineering workshop.”

The new technique, called horizontal nozzle-pressurised spinning, is an energy efficient process that doesn’t require the high voltages of other fibre production techniques such as electrospinning.

The team say that adapting existing pressurised spinning machines to the new process should be relatively straightforward. The greater challenge is likely to be the logistics of sourcing and transporting the raw material, cow dung, but that the environmental and commercial benefits of doing so would be significant.

Ms Yanqi Dai, first author of the study from UCL Mechanical Engineering, said: “Dairy farm waste such as cow manure is a threat to the environment and humans, especially through waterway pollution, the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere when it decomposes, and the spread of pathogens. It is also often a burden on farmers to dispose of properly.

“Horizontal nozzle-pressurised spinning could be a huge boost to the global dairy farming industry, by putting this problematic waste product to good use and perhaps creating a new source of income.”

The research team is currently seeking opportunities to work with dairy farmers to take advantage of the technology and scale it up.

Animal waste is a growing problem globally. Research in 2019 estimated that the amount of animal waste is due to increase by 40% between 2003 and 2030 to at least five billion tons, with many farms producing more manure than they can legitimately use as fertiliser. This waste often finds its way into water, where it can have a devastating effect on ecosystems and even lead to disease in humans.

Core pressurised spinning research at UCL was made possible by grants awarded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).

Notes to Editors:

For more information, please contact:

 Dr Matt Midgley

+44 (0)20 7679 9064

m.midgley@ucl.ac.uk

Publication:

Yanqi Dai et al. ‘Harnessing cow manure waste for nanocellulose extraction and sustainable small-structure manufacturing’ is published in The Journal of Cleaner Production and is strictly embargoed until Wednesday 7 May 2025 at 05:01 BST / 00:01 ET.

About UCL – London’s Global University

UCL is a diverse global community of world-class academics, students, industry links, external partners, and alumni. Our powerful collective of individuals and institutions work together to explore new possibilities.

Since 1826, we have championed independent thought by attracting and nurturing the world's best minds. Our community of more than 50,000 students from 150 countries and over 16,000 staff pursues academic excellence, breaks boundaries and makes a positive impact on real world problems.

The Times and Sunday Times University of the Year 2024, we are consistently ranked among the top 10 universities in the world and are one of only a handful of institutions rated as having the strongest academic reputation and the broadest research impact.

We have a progressive and integrated approach to our teaching and research – championing innovation, creativity and cross-disciplinary working. We teach our students how to think, not what to think, and see them as partners, collaborators and contributors.  

For almost 200 years, we are proud to have opened higher education to students from a wide range of backgrounds and to change the way we create and share knowledge.

We were the first in England to welcome women to university education and that courageous attitude and disruptive spirit is still alive today. We are UCL.

www.ucl.ac.uk | Follow @uclnews on Bluesky | Read news at www.ucl.ac.uk/news/ | Listen to UCL podcasts on SoundCloud | View images on Flickr | Find out what’s on at UCL Minds

 

Importance of reinstating CDC’s Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC)



Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America




Arlington, VA – May 7, 2025 – CDC’s Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) is a critical asset to the nation’s public health infrastructure. It provides evidence-based guidance that directly informs federal healthcare standards and protects both patients and healthcare workers across hospitals, outpatient clinics, and extended care facilities. HICPAC’s recommendations are the basis for healthcare practices that facilities use daily to keep people safe from complications from healthcare-associated infections (including disinfection and sterilization practices for patient care instruments and equipment, isolation precautions for infectious diseases both confirmed and suspected, and disease-specific care and guidance recommendations).  These guidelines inform facility-level policies, procedures, and standard work to keep patients and health care workers safe.

The decision to terminate HICPAC creates a preventable gap in national preparedness and response capacity, leaving healthcare facilities without timely, evidence-based and expert-driven recommendations at a time when threats from emerging pathogens and antimicrobial resistance are on the rise. The committee’s interdisciplinary composition—drawing on expertise in epidemiology, infectious disease, infection prevention, hospital administration, occupational health, and patient advocacy —ensures that its guidance is scientifically rigorous and operationally practical. Disbanding HICPAC jeopardizes decades of progress in preventing healthcare-associated infections. The depth of HICPAC's review of scientific evidence and its members' hundreds of years of collective experience result in guidelines widely accepted as the standard of care by healthcare accrediting organizations and CMS. The absence of this committee’s guidance creates a significant void in the field, fosters uncertainty among healthcare facilities, and put patients at risk.  

HICPAC is an essential component of patient safety, and its contributions cannot be replicated by the private sector. As professional societies representing the infection prevention and infectious diseases community, we strongly urge CDC through HHS to reinstate HICPAC to preserve a resilient, coordinated, and science-driven public health infrastructure.   

 

About APIC
Founded in 1972, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) is the leading association for infection preventionists and epidemiologists. With more than 15,000 members, APIC advances the science and practice of infection prevention and control. APIC carries out its mission through research, advocacy, and patient safety; education, credentialing, and certification; and fostering the development of the infection prevention and control workforce of the future. Together with our members and partners, we are working toward a safer world through the prevention of infection. Join us and learn more at apic.org.

Media contacts: Aaron Cohen, aaroncohenpr@gmail.com; Malina Jacobowitz, mjacobowitz@apic.org

About SHEA 

The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) works to advance the science and practice of healthcare epidemiology and infection prevention. Founded in 1980, SHEA promotes education, research, and advocacy to improve patient care and safety. For more information, visit www.shea-online.org.   

Media Contact: Lindsay MacMurray, lmacmurray@shea-online.org

About PIDS

PIDS membership encompasses leaders across the global scientific and public health spectrum, including clinical care, advocacy, academics, government, and the pharmaceutical industry. From fellowship training to continuing medical education, research, regulatory issues and guideline development, PIDS members are the core professionals advocating for the improved health of children with infectious diseases both nationally and around the world, participating in critical public health and medical professional advisory committees that determine the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases, immunization practices in children, and the education of pediatricians. For more information, visit http://www.pids.org.

Media Contact: Alan Fleming,  AFleming@idsociety.org


About IDSA
The Infectious Diseases Society of America is a community of more than 13,000 physicians, scientists and public health experts who specialize in infectious diseases. Its purpose is to improve the health of individuals, communities and society by promoting excellence in patient care, education, research, public health and prevention relating to infectious diseases. Learn more at 
idsociety.org.

Media Contact: Jennifer Morales, jmorales@idsociety.org