Wednesday, May 07, 2025

 

Are you curious? It might help you stay sharp as you age



New research shows questions you ask and interest in lifelong learning might protect against Alzheimer's disease




University of California - Los Angeles




What is the trick to aging successfully? If you’re curious about learning the answer, you might already be on the right track, according to an international team of psychologists including several from UCLA. Their research shows that some forms of curiosity can increase well into old age and suggests that older adults who maintain curiosity and want to learn new things relevant to their interests may be able to offset or even prevent Alzheimer’s disease. Conversely, those who show muted curiosity and disinterest may be at risk for dementia. The finding contradicts prior research that showed that curiosity decreases with age.

“The psychology literature shows that oftentimes what's known as trait curiosity, or a person’s general level of curiosity, tends to decline with age,” said UCLA psychologist Alan Castel, who is the senior author of a new paper published in the journal PLOS One. “But we thought that was a little bit strange and went against some of the things we saw in some of the older adult participants in our experiments, who would often be very engaged and interested in learning about memory, specifically, but even other forms of trivia.”

Castel and Mary Whatley, who led the research as a doctoral student at UCLA and is now an assistant professor of psychology at Western Carolina University, and colleagues Kou Murayama and Michiko Sakaki at the University of Tübingen and Kochi University of Technology, wondered if the answer lay in a different type of curiosity called state curiosity.

State curiosity is what psychologists call the kind of momentary feeling of curiosity people experience when they are asked about specific topics. Trait curiosity, on the other hand, is a personality trait. Some people, for example, might not be very inquisitive by nature, being content to accept things more or less at face value (trait curiosity), but have a passionate thirst for knowledge in specific topics or hobbies (state curiosity). All people possess varying degrees of both trait and state curiosity.

To tease apart the two types of curiosity, the researchers recruited a large sample of participants between the ages of 20 and 84, with an average age of 44, to complete an

online questionnaire designed to assess how curious they were in general, or their trait curiosity. Then, to test state curiosity, the researchers asked the participants to guess the answers to hard trivia questions that most people were unlikely to already know — e.g., What was the first country to give women the right to vote? The researchers asked people to guess an answer, then asked participants how interested they were to know the answer before showing the correct answer (if you are curious: New Zealand).

Analysis showed that the two kinds of curiosity are correlated: People who have more state curiosity also experience more trait curiosity, and vice versa. In general, trait curiosity did decline across the adult lifespan. However, the interest ratings people gave in learning new information from trivia — a measure of state curiosity — declined in early adulthood, then increased sharply after middle age and continued upward well into old age. The finding, Castel said, mirrors research that shows a dip in happiness in midlife.

One reason for the discrepancy, the researchers suggest, is that until middle age, people are usually interested in acquiring the knowledge, skills and opportunities they need to succeed at school and their jobs, pay mortgages and raise families, and thus a fairly high level of overall curiosity is needed. These obligations also come with stressors that could contribute to a decline in overall happiness. But as they age and gather this knowledge, they don’t need to allocate as many resources to trait curiosity. As their children leave home and they begin to retire, for example, people can indulge specific interests, and state curiosity increases.

“Our findings fit with some of my work on selectivity theory, which is that as we get older, we don’t want to stop learning, we’re just more selective about what we want to learn,” Castel said. “You see this in the context of lifelong learning: A lot of older adults will go back to take classes or pick up hobbies or engage in bird watching. I think it shows that this level of curiosity, if maintained, can really keep us sharp as we age.”

Castel said that his research on memory has shown that people tend to quickly forget information that doesn’t engage their curiosity.

“As we get older, maybe we want to be focused on the things that are important, and we forget the things that are less relevant,” Castel said. “Anecdotally, a lot of older adults I speak to say that it's important to stay curious. That fits with some of the research that shows that people who have early stages of dementia might show disinterest in things that they once enjoyed.”

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute on Aging, the Leverhulme Trust and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

 

People displaying high problematic (excessive and dependent) social media use are more likely to engage with and believe fake news



PLOS
Problematic social media use is associated with believing in and engaging with fake news 

image: 

People displaying high problematic (excessive and dependent) social media use are more likely to engage with and believe fake news.

view more 

Credit: ROBIN WORRALL, Unsplash, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)




People displaying high problematic (excessive and dependent) social media use are more likely to engage with and believe fake news

Article URLhttps://plos.io/3EFkKKP

Article title: Problematic social media use is associated with believing in and engaging with fake news

Author countries: U.S.

Funding: DM and MDM received funding for this research from the Michigan State University Trifecta Initiative for Interdisciplinary Health Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

 

Better physical health probably follows religious and spiritual engagement, rather than vice versa, per six year longitudinal US study aiming to tease out this relationship




PLOS

“Which comes first”: Religious/spiritual engagement or health? Initial observations from longitudinal analyses 

image: 

Better physical health probably follows religious and spiritual engagement, rather than vice versa, per six year longitudinal U.S. study aiming to tease out this relationship.

view more 

Credit: avi_acl, Pixabay, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)





Better physical health probably follows religious and spiritual engagement, rather than vice versa, per six year longitudinal U.S. study aiming to tease out this relationship

Article URLhttps://plos.io/42vnJyK

Article title: “Which comes first”: Religious/spiritual engagement or health? Initial observations from longitudinal analyses

Author countries: U.S.

Funding: Dr. Neal Krause received funding for Wave 1 of this study (Grant ID: 40077), and Dr. Gail Ironson received funding for Wave 2 of this study (Grant ID: 61430), from the John Templeton Foundation who did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The URL for this project is: https://www.templeton.org/grant/landmark-spirituality-and-health-survey-follow-up-prediction-to-mortality-mental-and-physical-health-outcomes.

 

In Reddit posts about climate change, just 1 in 25 links are to scientific sources - versus mass media and social media sources - evidencing the lack of science-based debate




PLOS
In Reddit posts about climate change, just 1 in 25 links are to scientific sources - versus mass media and social media sources - evidencing the lack of science-based debate 

image: 

Person typing on a laptop 

view more 

Credit: Unsplash, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)




In Reddit posts about climate change, just 1 in 25 links are to scientific sources - versus mass media and social media sources - evidencing the lack of science-based debate.

####

Article URL: https://plos.io/4jZKIYA

Article Title: The role of science in the climate change discussions on Reddit

Author Countries: Austria, Italy

Funding: The authors acknowledge support from the Lagrange Project of the Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation (ISI Foundation, to PC, MT, KK, DP, YM) funded by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Torino (Fondazione CRT), Italy. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

4 in 10 mpox social media memes spread misinformation or stigmatize minorities



PLOS
4 in 10 mpox social media memes spread misinformation or stigmatize minorities 

image: 

A male hand affected by blistering rash because of Mpox 

view more 

Credit: Getty Images (@gettyimages)




4 in 10 mpox social media memes spread misinformation or stigmatize minorities, though the majority are accurate and promote awareness, per analysis of 200 memes circulated during the global public health emergency. 4 in 10 mpox social media memes spread misinformation or stigmatize minorities, though the majority are accurate and promote awareness, per analysis of 200 memes circulated during the global public health emergency. 

####

Article URL: https://plos.io/42ZABMv

Article Title: Short communication: Mpox memes, the gift that conceals a blade

Author Countries: Uganda

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.