Friday, May 09, 2025

 

Trump’s First 100 Days See Unprecedented Attacks Against Cuba

“In its first 100 days the Trump administration has moved with unprecedented speed and aggression, with more attacks to come.”

By the Cuba Solidarity Campaign

Cuba knew it would be in for a gruelling four years when Trump was elected for a second term, but the speed with which his new administration has escalated US economic warfare against the island is unprecedented.

In his first term, just as he was leaving office, Trump designated Cuba a ‘State Sponsor of Terrorism’ (SSOT). Inclusion on the SSOT list deprives Cuba of trade, investment and access to international banking mechanisms, warning off much-needed potential investors and fuelling an economic and migration crisis. The Biden administration can receive no praise for their short-lived removal of Cuba from the list. Despite his election promise to undo the 243 extra punitive measures imposed by Trump, Biden sat on his hands as Cubans suffered COVID-19 and the worst shortages in recent history, waiting until six days before he stood down to reverse the SSOT designation. Trump returned Cuba to the list within hours of his inauguration.

On the same day the White House restored the “Restricted Entities List,” which makes hundreds of Cuban entities effectively off-limits for US companies or individuals to have dealings with. The original list was introduced under the first Trump administration and also bars visiting US tour groups, individuals or officials from staying at more than 100 Cuban hotels.

In a Facebook post, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel called the moves “an act of arrogance and disregard for truth” and said “the legitimate and noble cause of our people will prevail and we will once again succeed.”

Foreign minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla was also defiant. “It will cause harm, but it won’t subdue the firm determination of our people,” he said on X.

An end to remittances?

On 31 January the Cuban company Orbit SA was also named a “restricted entity.” Orbit is responsible for processing remittances (money sent home to their families by Cubans living abroad) most of which are sent through Western Union. On 8 February Western Union suspended transfers to Cuba “due to a change in US sanctions regulations.” Unless they can find another unrestricted Cuban entity to work with, remittances, which are a lifeline for many Cuban families during the current economic crisis, will end indefinitely.

In February, Trump revoked Biden’s suspension of Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, the part which enables international companies to be sued if they do business with properties nationalised during the Cuban Revolution. This controversial part of the Act, which was signed into law by President Clinton in 1996, had been waived by every president for 23 years, following pressure from world governments – until Trump.

As a result, since 2019, around 45 lawsuits have been filed, mainly against US companies – another extraterritorial threat to deter investors from working with Cuba.

Cuba has always declared its willingness to find a solution for any compensation claims for nationalised properties. Indeed, it signed and honoured agreements after the Revolution with many countries including Spain, Switzerland, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany and France. However, the US government refused to enter into negotiations at the time.

Cuba responded with a statement from the Foreign Ministry which called on “the international community to stop, denounce, and support our people in the face of this new and dangerous onslaught of aggression that has only just begun.

“They will do much harm with their murderous and cowardly plans and measures, but they will never achieve their main objective of bringing Cuba to its knees and subduing it.”

New threats from hardliners

State Department officials have made it clear that the aggression is only just beginning. Shortly after his appointment, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the administration would be “restoring a tough US-Cuba policy.” With Venezuela and Nicaragua also in his sights, he accused the three countries of being “enemies of humanity,” due to the number of migrants to the US, missing the irony that it is US economic sanctions against all three that is driving the crisis.

Mauricio Claver-Carone, another pro-blockade hardliner, who took credit for the ʻmaximum pressure’ policy against Cuba from 2017-21, is now Special Envoy for Latin America. In February he told a Politico reporter that regime change in Cuba was “imminent” and that the US can be “very creative” in bringing it about.

In Congress, Republican Senator Rick Scott announced that he didn’t think the US “should have any travel to Cuba,” and that he would be pushing for travel restrictions “by the end of the year.”

Medical missions under attack

In February the US launched a direct attack on Cuba’s international medical missions. Rubio announced diplomats, officials, and any individual and their family members would face visa restrictions and other sanctions if they had any association with the humanitarian programmes. Since being introduced after the Revolution, Cuba’s international medical brigades have treated millions of people in the global south and are deemed vital for the healthcare infrastructure of many countries, especially some of Cuba’s closest neighbours in the Caribbean.

Rubio accused the medical missions of depriving “ordinary Cubans of the medical care they desperately need in their home country,” when in reality it is the US blockade that is blocking Cuba’s ability to buy the life-saving medicines and surgical supplies its people desperately need. For years the US government has attempted to undermine the medical programmes, providing USAID funding to try and expose them as “forced labour.” However this propaganda as been challenged both by Cuban officials and the doctors themselves, and by international observers, who argue that the missions are voluntary and provide critical services to the communities in need.

An editorial in the Jamaica Gleaner damned the plan as “nothing short of callous, cruel and vindictive.” It would “be felt not only by Cuba, but by poor people in Africa, Asia and the Americas, including several Caribbean countries, Jamaica among them.”

The leaders of CARICOM countries were quick and vehement in their condemnation of this measure, which would sanction them for using Cuban doctors and nurses in their health systems.

“Does anyone expect that, because I want to keep my (US) visa, Iʼm going to let 60 poor, working-class people die? That will never happen,” said Ralph Gonsalves, Prime Minister of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, where Cuban doctors working at the country’s Medical and Diagnostic Centre save dozens of lives every day.

Joseph Andall, Grenada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, commented: “We not only have a legal obligation, but also a moral and ethical obligation to support the Cuban people; our health infrastructure will collapse without Cuba’s generous intervention, so we must always adopt a principled stance.”

Rubio travelled to the Caribbean in March and received further pushback during a public press conference with the Jamaican Prime Minister. In response to the claim that Cuban medical brigades were unpaid forced labour, Andrew Holness told the US Secretary of State that his government planned to keep using Cuban doctors and nurses in their hospitals under a programme which operated according to international labour standards.

“In terms of Cuban doctors in Jamaica, let us be clear, the Cuban doctors in Jamaica have been incredibly helpful to us” he said.

“Jamaica has a deficit in health personnel primarily because many of our health personnel have migrated to other countries. We are, however, very careful not to exploit the Cuban doctors who are here,” Holness continued.

With a slew of pro-blockade hardliners appointed to ambassadorial and White House posts, and a new Senate bill which seeks to impose even harsher sanctions on foreigners who “engage” with Cuba, all levels of the US government and the legislature are focused on strangling the Cuban economy and subjugating its revolutionary people.

In its first 100 days the Trump administration has moved with unprecedented speed and aggression, with more attacks to come. The solidarity movement must step up to this challenge, and prepare for a four-year fight alongside the Cuban people in defence of their sovereignty and Revolution.



May Day in Cuba – A Reaffirmation of the Revolution

“Cuba demonstrates that another world is possible – one in which human life is valued & prioritised, in which people can live in dignity and at peace.”

By Bernard Regan, Secretary, Cuba Solidarity Campaign.

May Day in Cuba is a national holiday marked by huge demonstrations across the country and this year will be no exception.  Over one million Cubans will demonstrate in Havana in the Plaza de la Revolucion led by the trade union movement.

The event will be a positive reaffirmation of the values of the revolution and an expression of Cuba’s determination to resist the pressures of the blockade imposed on the island by successive United States administrations and most recently of course by President Donald Trump.

The blockade is imposed on Cuba despite the United Nations General Assembly voting 32 times consecutively to call for its complete removal. From 1st March 2023 to February 2024 the blockade caused material damages estimated at $5,056,800,000. Just 15 minutes without the blockade would enable Cuba to provide hearing aids for all the children who needed them; 30 minutes blockadeless and all the electrical and conventional wheelchairs needed could be provided. The list goes on and on. It is a totally unjustifiable persecution of the Cuban people.

 In November 2024 the most recent vote recorded 187 countries against the blockade and only two (USA and Israel) voting for its continuance whilst one nation (Moldova) abstained.  Despite this overwhelming vote Trump continues these vindictive policies.  Far from having any negative impact on the world Cuba has displayed an exemplary record of sending medical support to countries across the globe in need of practical solidarity. 

Since 1960, over 600,000 medical professionals have gone to over 160 countries to provide their expertise.  In 2020 it was estimated that there were 30,000 Cuban doctors in 67 countries.  Britain’s population is over 6 times that of Cuba.  Just imagine if Britain had acted with such a selfless sense of solidarity for people across the globe, how many more millions of lives could have been saved and sick and injured treated.

Over the whole period of Cuba’s existence, it has not been possible to put a cigarette paper between the policies of Democrats or Republicans.   Occasionally there have been changes of tack – as when President Obama established diplomatic relations with Cuba but did not remove the most vicious of the legislation that was imposed on the island. 

Trump has never made a secret of his animosity towards Cuba or indeed for that matter towards any nation that asserts its sovereignty.  In 2018 speaking at the United Nations General Assembly he said, “It has been the formal policy of our country since President Monroe (1823) that we reject the interference of foreign nations in this (western) hemisphere and in our own affairs.” It was a clear declaration of intent that he wished to make the Latin American economies subservient to Wall Street’s interests.

On taking office on 20th January 2025 Trump placed Cuba on the list of State Sponsors of Terrorism (SSOT) just 24 hours after his taking office.  President Biden had taken Cuba off the list – but only a week before he was to cease being President.  The appointment by Trump of Marco Rubio as his Secretary of State signalled the President’s clear intention to follow the vicious anti-Cuban policies of his co-Republican.

The SSOT status has been described by some as equivalent to an economic “death sentence”.  It is designed to cut Cuba off from any access to international banking agencies making it extremely difficult, if not impossible to trade, to obtain vital medical, foodstuffs, materials and equipment critical to the functioning of the islands economy from other countries worldwide.

Cuba is trying to deal with this for example by reducing its dependency on oil to generate electricity.  It has reached agreements with China, for example, to provide around 100 photovoltaic farms which are currently in the process of being installed.  Whilst some hope that the BRICS group of countries might provide an alternative international currency to rival the almighty dollar that seems unlikely in the short-term and may indeed not come to fruition given the tariff war that the White House is unleashing which may indeed create divisions between China and India for example.

The USA’s tariff wars will continue.  Trump is fearful of China’s influence in Latin America where some 20 countries have already joined the Belt and Road initiative, hence his obsession with the Panama Canal and the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. However, the opening of the Chancay mega-port in Peru and the much talked about potential alternative of a Nicaraguan “Panama Canal” threaten Washington’s aspitrations for the region. Whilst China will undoubtedly pursue its own economic interests in a pragmatic manner, unlike the USA, it is almost certain, given its track record, that it will not interfere in the internal politics of the countries it enters into trade agreements with.

The tariffs that Washington has imposed on China are a clear indication of the economic war for domination of the continent that is taking place. Like Monroe before him the USA is now engaged in a war to exclude China from many markets across the globe but Latin America is an immediate concern.  The continent holds invaluable resources of rare earth minerals as well as oil in abundance and Washington has already mobilised the Pentagon in this economic conflict.  The current head of the United States Southern Command, Admiral Alvin Holsey, has followed in the footsteps of his predecessor General Laura Richardson, in identifying the economic resources that the continent holds as being of strategic interest to the USA. On 14th January – just a week before Trump was inaugurated – the columnist Bret Stephens wrote in the New York Times a column calling for a USA military intervention to overthrow President Maduro in Venezuela.            

The British government casts its vote against the inhuman blockade of Cuba but does nothing to challenge its punitive affects.  The solidarity campaign with Cuba is as vital as it has ever been. Trump wants to create a unipolar world with Washington and Wall Street at its centre.  Cuba demonstrates that another world is possible – one in which human life is valued and prioritised, in which people can live in dignity and at peace. It is those values which have led to Cuba standing alongside the people of Palestine against tyranny and oppression.  Cuba does not stand alone but we must continue to raise our voices and encourage others to do so to end the unjustifiable assault against its sovereignty which continues to be inflicted on it by successive Presidents of the United States of America.


Behind Trump’s Brutal & Debasing Latino Deportations

“The Trump administration has invoked the 1798 Alien and Enemies Act as a thinly veiled legal pretext to justify the mass expulsion of Venezuelans, Nicaraguans & others.”

By Tim Young, Labour Friends of Progressive Latin America

President Trump’s recent and ongoing expulsions of Latin Americans and others has attracted headline news around the world and particularly in the region. As part of this, Trump has taken steps to end birthright citizenship, a move that would disproportionately affect nearly 70 million Latinos in the US. Arbitrary arrests, deportations, and the revocation of documentation are escalating.

But to understand why this is taking place, we need to take a wider look at how it dovetails with his reactionary agenda for both the US domestically and for key countries in Latin America.

At root are an interlocking series of countries and sectors of society that Trump scapegoats for what he perceives to be the current ills of the United States. In this mindset, the US economy’s weaknesses are the responsibility of countries – particularly China – which sell goods to the US that it no longer produces or cannot compete with. Trump’s answer is tariffs, to promote domestic manufacturing and production and stop further outsourcing. Tariffs on China’s goods are an eye-watering 145% but other countries, notably Mexico and Canada, have had high tariffs threatened.

Coupled with that is blaming migrants – for stealing jobs, for creating a housing crisis, for crime, for illicit drugs and for all the usual litany of problems that this reactionary line of attack is marshalled as an explanation.

Project 2025, the blueprint for Trump’s presidency assembled by a coalition of conservative organisations but led by the notorious right-wing Heritage Foundation think-tank, set out in detail how the incoming Trump administration should set about dealing with the perceived culprits for the US’s problems.

In Latin America, it notes recent “leftist electoral victories from Mexico to Chile”, with governments “hostile to American interests and …more open to striking partnerships with Communist China.”

Southcom leader Admiral Alvin Hosley echoed this in testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee in February, saying; “the malign activities, harmful influence, and autocratic philosophy of China are a direct threat to the democratic will.”

At a level below military engagement, Trump has promised the biggest mass deportations of undocumented migrants in US history, as part of his objective to “secure the border, finish building the wall, and deport illegal aliens.”

Foremost in line here are Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, but Honduran migrants are in Trump’s sights too, leading President Xiomara Castro to threaten shutting US military bases in the country if Trump follows through with deportations.

To conduct deportations, the Trump administration has invoked the 1798 Alien and Enemies Act as a thinly veiled legal pretext to justify the mass expulsion of Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, and others. Some deportees have been sent to detention facilities such as the notorious Guantánamo Bay.

As part of these moves, the Trump administration struck a deal with the ultra-reactionary Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, paying US$6 million to detain 238 Venezuelans branded “foreign terrorists.” Amnesty International has condemned the Venezuelans’ expulsion, which happened despite a court order explicitly barring their removal. – and the degrading treatment of detainees has also drawn wide condemnation

In a joint statement (reproduced in full below), the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign and the Nicaragua Solidarity Campaign Action Group have unequivocally condemned Trump’s brutal and debasing deportations – and calling for increased campaigning against them.

Let’s stand up to Trump!

Statement: Trump’s mass deportations of migrants must be condemned.

Joint statement by Venezuela Solidarity Campaign and Nicaragua Solidarity Campaign Action Group.

“The Trump administration has invoked the 1798 Alien and Enemies Act as a thinly veiled legal pretext to justify the mass expulsion of Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, and others. Some deportees have been sent to detention facilities such as the notorious internment camp in Guantanamo Bay – many were detained without evidence, arrest warrants, or probable cause, let alone justification for imprisonment.

Trump has also taken steps to end birthright citizenship, a move that would disproportionately affect nearly 70 million Latinos in the US. Arbitrary arrests, deportations, and the revocation of documentation – even for legal residents – are escalating daily.

The degrading treatment of detainees – often reminiscent of Guantanamo’s worst abuses – has drawn wide condemnation. While mainstream media has focused on Venezuelans, the New York Times reports that Guantanamo also holds Salvadorans and Nicaraguans, whom Secretary of Defense, Peter Hegseth dismissively refers to as “temporary transit” detainees.”

Trump has also revoked the long-standing policy granting to Cubans automatic permanent residence – a right once actively encouraged by the US government. Now, 530,000 Cubans, along with Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans who gained status under Biden, face deportation.

Many Venezuelan migrants are being falsely labelled as members of the Tren de Aragua gang on the flimsiest of reasons such as a tattoo in support of a football club, and shipped not only to Guantanamo but also to El Salvador’s CECOT prison – a so-called “Terrorism Confinement Centre” where conditions are subhuman, with reports from El Salvadoran organisations of over 300 deaths in custody, some showing clear signs of violence.

The Trump administration struck a deal with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, paying US$6 million to detain 238 Venezuelans branded “foreign terrorists” by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Amnesty International has condemned the Venezuelans’ expulsion, despite a court order explicitly barring their removal.

The Salvadoran organization Bloque de Resistencia y Rebeldia Popular (BRP) has denounced the Trump-Bukele pact as “arbitrary and dehumanising,” violating international law and making El Salvador complicit in Trump’s xenophobic and criminalising immigration policies. It has demanded the El Salvador Supreme Court nullify the detentions.

Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek Williams Saab has petitioned El Salvador’s Supreme Court for habeas corpus relief for detained Venezuelans, while President Maduro condemned the deportations as kidnappings and sought intervention from the UN’s Secretary General and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

A coordinated media campaign – spearheaded by Trump, far-right Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, and US Senators such as Ted Cruz and parroted by the main corporate media outlets – has propagated the myth of a Venezuelan government-backed Tren de Aragua cartel flooding the U.S. with criminals. President Maduro has described this campaign “as the biggest lie ever told about [Venezuela]” and has vowed to fight for the repatriation of every wrongfully detained Venezuelan.

We unequivocally condemn the US government’s egregious violation of migrants’ legal rights. This struggle must now become the focal point for the international solidarity movement, demanding the immediate release of all unjustly imprisoned migrants.”


Remembering Altab Ali and All Victims of Racism – Apsana Begum MP

“For decades, a toxic political game has been played, with parties competing on who can be tougher on immigration – a game that has yielded horrific consequences.”

By Apsana Begum MP

Forty-seven years ago, on May 4th, 25-year-old Altab Ali, a Bangladeshi garment worker, was murdered on his walk home in East London.

This brutal act occurred in a time when racist attacks were horrifyingly commonplace for our community.

My Bangladeshi parents recounted a 1970s East End where bricks regularly shattered windows, filth was smeared on doorsteps, and hate was shoved through letterboxes.

The presence of far-right skinheads and violent thugs created a climate of fear, especially after the National Front established its base nearby in September 1978.

For Asian and Black residents, daily life was fraught with danger; simply walking alone was perilous, and families often lived almost in a state of siege within their own homes.

Altab Ali’s murder became a catalyst. Ten days later, a powerful statement of resistance saw 7,000 people march, demanding action against this tide of hate.

This tragedy ignited a vital grassroots movement, amplifying the voices of the marginalised and providing crucial support to those targeted by racial violence.

Their defiant slogans – “Enough is Enough,” “Here to Stay – Here to Fight,” “Come What May, We are Here to Stay” – resonated with a community determined to stand its ground.

Disturbingly, this history echoes loudly today. Racism and scapegoating are on the rise, cynically employed to divert attention from political failures. The surge in far-right extremism is undeniably linked to governments slashing vital services and attacking working-class communities.

Too many politicians and media outlets continue to peddle the dangerous lie that migrants are the source of our problems, deliberately stoking anxiety and fear.

For decades, a toxic political game has been played, with parties competing on who can be tougher on immigration – a game that has yielded horrific consequences.

The truth is crystal clear: targeting migrants does nothing to improve the living standards of the wider population. It doesn’t build hospitals, schools, or create opportunities. In fact, it often achieves the opposite, fostering division and resentment.

The East End boasts a proud history of anti-racism and anti-fascism. I am immensely proud to represent a diverse constituency that consistently stands united against injustice, just as we stand against the horrors unfolding in Gaza.

As the first hijab-wearing MP, I am deeply aware of the legacy of struggle I inherit. I honour the courage and hope of those who paved the way. I honour their courage, their resilience, and their unwavering belief in justice.

In remembering Altab Ali and all victims of racism, our message to those who traffic in division is unwavering: not here, not anywhere.

Because the only genuine way to defeat the rising tide of the right is to utterly reject the toxicity and futility of their hateful ideology.

But we must go further.

We must offer an inspirational alternative – demonstrating what truly standing up for our communities entails and what genuine bravery and honesty look like.

People are desperate for real change.

They see a wealthy nation, the sixth-largest economy globally, where poverty and homelessness are spiralling out of control.

They don’t believe they are here to serve the economy; they demand an economy that serves the people. They understand that hope, not fear, is the only path to overcoming despair.


POWER IN THE DARKNESS 
TOM ROBINSON BAND  
ROCK AGAINST RACISM

NHS – Fat Cats get the Cream

“In short, private equity has a reputation for aiming to make a profit for its investors, including very rich individuals, in as short a time as possible: & the ways it achieves that are often not positive for staff, customers or the community.”

By Keep Our NHS Public

The recent agreement for two major US private equity companies, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) and Stonepeak, to acquire the UK property company Assura for £1.61bn ($2.09bn), has once again highlighted the involvement of private equity in the NHS. Assura specialises in healthcare property with more than 600 health care buildings, including many GP surgeries and primary care centres.

Assura is currently a public company and the deal will be put to shareholders for agreement, but the Assura board has recommended acceptance of the deal. Regulatory approval is also needed. The board had previously turned down a £1.5bn bid for the company from Primary Health Properties (PHP). The acquisition will remove Assura from the stock exchange and take the company private. The public sector market, such as health, care or education, is attractive to private equity (PE), as their income from the NHS or local authorities is seen as virtually guaranteed.

Reuters notes that the bid by KKR/Stonepeak reflects “persistent interest from the private equity backers in capitalising on resilient demand for healthcare infrastructure across the UK.” Private equity and other investors will not have missed the promise in the Autumn budget in October 2024 of a £100m capital funding which is ‘earmarked’ for 200 GP estates upgrades. This money will be available from April 2025 and is part of the Government’s increase of £3.1bn for capital funding between 2023/24 and 2025/26, bringing the total to £13.6bn.

In the UK, public services are increasingly being targeted by PE investors. The social care sector, for vulnerable adults and children, is now almost exclusively privately owned with heavy involvement of PE companies. In recent years, the UK healthcare sector has seen several takeovers covering a wide range of services, including ambulance services, diagnostics, community care, complex care, and dentistry. Companies owned by PE include those with large contracts with the NHS, such as The Priory Group and Active Care Group in mental health, Everlight Radiology in diagnostics, and EMED in ambulance services.

One of the most high profile PE-owned UK healthcare companies is HCRG Care, which has large contracts in community healthcare and over 50 GP surgeries. The company is owned by the PE company Twenty20 Capital. Most recently in October 2024, the company was awarded the contract to run adult and community services in Bath, and North East Somerset, Swindon and Wiltshire ICS worth £1.3bn, and the contract for children’s services in Surrey and parts of North East Hampshire, worth £295m over 96 months.

There are well known concerns over the involvement of private companies within the NHS, but the involvement of private equity increases these concerns due to the way this type of investment operates. In short, private equity has a reputation for aiming to make a profit for its investors, including pension funds and very rich individuals, in as short a time as possible: and the ways it achieves that are often not positive for staff, customers or the community in which the business is based.

For this quick profit to be accomplished, private equity companies have a reputation for being ruthless with cost-cutting, including using a reduction in head-count; transfer of production overseas to a low-cost economy; renegotiation of supplier contracts; a merger with a company they already own; use of lower-skilled workers on lower wages; selling of company subsidiaries; and selling of valuable assets, such as property, which often they lease back.

Another issue is the heavy reliance on debt to finance acquisitions – saddling the companies with vast amounts of debt, which means that bankruptcy is more likely. In the care home sector, the downfall of Southern Cross in 2011 and Four Seasons in 2019 were fuelled by debts from their private equity investors. More recently, the involvement of private equity in children’s social care, which includes fostering, children’s homes and other services such as residential school places, has been the subject of damming investigations by the Competition and Markets Authority and the Local Government Authorities (LGA).


 REST IN POWER

Remembering Anne Scargill, 1941-2025

“Anne was a friend to so many folk, not just in Britain but around the world. She left her mark and her name will resonate for many years to come. Anne Scargill’s legacy is not simply one of resistance but of empowerment.”

By Heather Wood and Betty Cook

Anne Scargill, a true leader, a good friend and a proud socialist has died after struggling with ill health for a number of years.

Anne was one of the founding members of Women Against Pit Closures (WAPC) and one the most courageous voices for working class communities during and after the Miners’ Strike of 1984/85.

Sadly, Anne passed away on 11 April 2025. Her death marks the passing of a symbol of resilience, grassroots activism
and enduring solidarity.

Anne was a Yorkshire lass; she grew up in a coalfield community where she experienced firsthand the hardships and camaraderie of mining life. It was a world built on shared labour, unspoken rules and deeply rooted pride.

Anne became a central figure in the tumultuous struggles of Britain’s industrial heartlands. She emerged as a formidable figure, particularly during the Miners’ Strike when she helped mobilise and organise thousands of women in support of their partners, brothers and sons who were fighting not just for jobs but for their communities and their dignity.

From food kitchens to protest lines, Anne Scargill was there; she became a defining voice of the WAPC movement.

While the Thatcher government and much of the mainstream media sought to demonise the strike, Anne helped reframe it not as an industrial dispute but as a human struggle.

Her speeches delivered in her strong Yorkshire accent and filled with passion were grounded in the language of fairness, justice and human rights. She gave women a voice.

After the strike, Anne remained active in community politics, environmental protest and campaigns for social justice.

She was arrested multiple times, including at a high-profile anti-fracking demonstration and, in 1997, chained herself to the gates of a colliery in South Wales to protest its closure. Her defiance remained undimmed long after the pits fell silent.

Anne was a friend to so many folk, not just in Britain but around the world. She left her mark and her name will resonate for many years to come. Anne Scargill’s legacy is not simply one of resistance but of empowerment.

Her work helped to ensure that the fight for jobs was also a fight for gender equality, for dignity and for community survival.

Tributes have poured in from trade unions, MPs and grassroots organisations across Britain and beyond. Frances O’Grady, the former TUC General Secretary, described her as a warrior for justice whose impact will echo for generations.

Anne leaves behind a legacy rooted in the belief that ordinary people when organised and determined can change the course of history. Her voice may now be silent but her spirit lives on at every picket line, in every protest chant and in every act of solidarity that challenges injustice.

Anne’s smile, the look of determination in her eyes never faded. She was loved, she is loved and she will never be forgotten.


  • This article was originally published in the May 2025 edition of Labour Briefing magazine.

As UK Energy Giants Pocket £514 Billion, It’s Time for Public Ownership – Jon Trickett

Jon Trickett MP
“The Labour government has created Great British Energy, which will provide support to companies to develop renewable energy projects. However, it stops short of actually operating these projects itself. I think we need to go the whole hog.”

By Jon Trickett MP

While families in our area have endured another expensive winter, the companies supplying our gas and electricity have been quietly making a fortune. According to new research from the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, the 20 major energy firms operating in the UK have made a staggering £514 billion in global profits since 2020.

That is half a trillion pounds in just a few years. Last year alone, they pocketed £115 billion. And yet, here in Wakefield district, many are still facing sky-high bills with little sign of relief in sight. It’s daylight robbery.

Most of these firms aren’t even British-owned. They’re controlled by foreign governments and financiers, who are extracting profits from UK households and sending them overseas. Local people are being ripped off, while executives and shareholders toast their record-breaking earnings.

Let’s be clear: energy is not a luxury. It’s a basic human need. And yet, in one of the richest countries in the world, people are forced to choose between heating and eating. It is indefensible.

Ofgem’s recent decision to raise the energy price cap by £111 a year – bringing the average bill to £1,849 – will put even more strain on bill payers. The government’s proposed cuts to sickness and disability benefits, combined with reductions to the winter fuel payment, could push some households over the edge.

Residents already know the impact of fuel poverty all too well. People are forced to ration heating and skip meals. Shockingly there are people who have fallen on hard times who are forced to rely on food banks or clothes banks to access life’s essentials. How can it be right that people are forced into hardship so that energy bosses can cash in?

It doesn’t have to be this way.

A recent poll by More in Common found that 57 per cent of people want energy back in public hands. Only 16 per cent oppose the idea. The message is clear: people are fed up with a broken system that puts profit before people.

Privatisation of our energy sector has been a disaster. Instead of investing in local infrastructure, cutting bills, or improving services, these companies have prioritised profits for shareholders. It’s time for change.

The Labour government has created Great British Energy, which will provide support to companies to develop renewable energy projects. However, it stops short of actually operating these projects itself. I think we need to go the whole hog.

Energy is a critical resource that powers our country. Like the NHS, it should be run in the public interest – not treated as a cash cow for shareholders. It’s simply too important to be left to the control of profiteers.

Greater public ownership across all parts of our energy market would provide much needed energy security in an uncertain world, but it would also mean fairer prices, local accountability, and profits reinvested into our communities – not siphoned off to foreign investors.