Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Climate Change is Worsening Seasonal Allergies


 June 9, 2025

Hazy summer day, southern Indiana. Photo: Jeffrey St. Clair.

As the seasons shift into spring and summer, flowers bloom, trees turn green, and the days grow longer and sunnier. However, for many, this time also marks the start of allergy season in the United States, which can begin as early as February in warmer regions and persist through early summer. Tree pollen usually kicks things off in early spring, followed by grass pollen in late spring and summer. Later in the year, fall allergies—primarily triggered by weed pollen, such as ragweed—begin in late summer and continue into autumn.

In 2023, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 25.7 percent of U.S. adults were diagnosed with seasonal allergies. That means about a quarter of Americans suffer from watery eyes, a tickly throat, and a runny nose. Pollen can make breathing outdoor air difficult. However, it’s getting worse: With climate change altering weather patterns and triggering an earlier and more prolonged high pollen count, we may all be experiencing more sneezing and breathing-related health issues than usual.

“If you live with seasonal allergies and feel like the pollen seasons feel longer and longer every year, you may be right,” writes Paul Gabrielsen, of the University of Utah. “[P]ollen seasons start 20 days earlier, are 10 days longer, and feature 21 percent more pollen than in 1990—meaning more days of itchy, sneezy, drippy misery.”

But it’s not just happening in the U.S., and the impacts can be fatal. In November 2016, a rare and deadly event known as “thunderstorm asthma” struck Melbourne, Australia, overwhelming emergency services as thousands experienced sudden, severe breathing problems. Hospitals saw a massive surge in asthma-related cases, with 10 deaths and many more struggling to breathe within minutes of the storm. Scientists later explained that storm activity had broken up pollen particles, releasing allergenic proteins into the air that triggered asthma attacks, even in people with no prior history of the condition.

Allergy specialist Dr. Kari Nadeau, chair of the Department of Environmental Health at the Harvard School of Public Health, blames global warming. “There are these extreme, chaotic conditions that climate change is associated with,” Nadeau told Boston 25 News in March 2023. “And that warming is adversely affecting our pollen seasons.

“Trees are getting the wrong message, and they’re releasing pollen earlier in the season,” said Nadeau. “So my patients, for example, otherwise would have started allergy season in March, now they’re having allergy season start in January–February.”

Pollen: A Pervasive Problem

Hay fever isn’t new. It was first described in 1819 when physician John Bostock presented a novel case to the Medical and Chirurgical Society, calling it a “case of a periodical affection of the eyes and chest.” It was the first recorded description of what he later called “catarrhus aestivus,” or summer catarrh, which would become what we know today as hay fever.

Since the first reported case in 1819, however, hay fever has become increasingly common. In 2024, hay fever affected 10–40 percent of the world’s population. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(1988−1994), which collected information from nearly 40,000 people in the United States, showed that 26.9 percent and 26.2 percent of the population were allergic to perennial ryegrass and ragweed respectively—percentages at least twice as high as in the previous survey (1976−1980).

It’s the pollen that’s to blame for allergy symptoms. Plants must join sex cells to reproduce. Pollen carries the male sex cells, so it must be transferred to the female plant in some way. Many plants use insects, such as bees, to transfer their pollen to other plants, while others rely on wind. The plants that are wind-pollinated produce tiny, light pollen that can be carried on a breeze—fantastic for their reproduction, disastrous for our respiration.

The Immune Response and Climate Change

When we inhale pollen grains, they can trigger an immune response in which our body attempts to defend itself against them. Our immune system can overreact to harmless pollen; the sneezing, watery eyes, and histamines that make your nose itchy are designed to kill or eject the pollen. If you’re prone to allergic rhinitis, the more pollen you’re exposed to, the worse your symptoms may be.

Not every hay fever sufferer is allergic to every pollen. It tends to be seasonal: In the spring, tree pollens like those from the birchoak, and mountain cedar cause the most problems, followed by grass and weeds like mugwort and nettle in the summer with weeds like ragweed (the leading cause of hay fever in the U.S.) and fungus spores following in autumn.

However, the primary factor, climate change, impacts hay fever throughout the year. Climate change can increase the release and potency of certain types of pollen, leading to more severe hay fever.

In 2015, the World Allergy Organization, a group comprising 97 medical societies from around the world, released a statement warning that climate change would impact the timing, duration, and severity of pollen seasons.

“The strong link between warmer weather and pollen seasons provides a crystal-clear example of how climate change is already affecting people’s health across the U.S.,” said William Anderegg, a biologist at the University of Utah, about his team’s research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2020.

“A number of smaller-scale studies—usually in greenhouse settings on small plants—had indicated strong links between temperature and pollen,” notes Anderegg. “This study reveals that connection at continental scales and explicitly links pollen trends to human-caused climate change.”

Warmer Weather Means More Pollen

The first culprit is the rise in temperature caused by climate change. Compared to previous decades, plants now bloom earlier and produce pollen for a more extended period of the year. According to Sanjiv Sur, MD, director and professor of Allergy and Immunology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, “There’s no question [that] as there’s global warming, the pollen season is increasing.”

A 2015 study published in Global Change Biology showed that, between 2001 and 2010, the U.S. pollen season started on average three days earlier than it did in the 1990s. A 2024 article by the Association of American Medical Colleges stated that over the past several decades, the pollen season has extended by as much as three weeks in some areas of North America. What’s more, the Global Change Biology study found that the amount of airborne pollen increased by more than 40 percent. “These changes are likely due to recent climate change and particularly the enhanced warming and precipitation at higher latitudes in the contiguous United States,” concluded the researchers.

This may also be contributing to the increase in people suffering from hay fever. One estimate predicts that by the 2050s, that number will reach four billion.

Pollen Problem Fueled by Carbon Dioxide

While warmer temperatures have led to earlier and longer pollen seasons, as well as more potent pollen, rising carbon dioxide levels are also contributing to plants producing more pollen. Plants feed on carbon dioxide, so when there’s an abundance of it, they can go wild, producing pollen. This, coupled with warmer temperatures, is ideal for plant growth and reproduction, which means more allergens for us.

Take, for example, the invasive and highly allergenic plant ragweed. In 2000, Lewis Ziska, an expert on climate change and its impact on plants, led a research team at the U.S. Department of Agriculture that grew ragweed in the lab under three conditions: pre-industrial levels of carbon dioxide, current levels, and the higher levels expected in the 21st century. They found that exposure to current levels increased the amount of pollen the ragweed produced by 131 percent compared to pre-industrial carbon dioxide levels. Under predicted future carbon dioxide levels, it skyrocketed to 320 percent. The researchers concluded that, “the continuing increase in atmospheric CO2 could directly influence public health by stimulating the growth and pollen production of allergy-inducing species such as ragweed.”

Ziska says the intensity of an allergic reaction depends on the amount of pollen released, the duration of exposure, and the allergenicity of the pollen. In ragweed, these three factors work strongly together. “What’s unique about ragweed is that it produces so much pollen—roughly a billion grains per plant,” he wrote in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives in 2016. “And the Amb a 1 protein [in the pollen coat] is also highly reactive with the immune system.”

No Escape for the City

Though it might seem that hay fever would be less of a problem in the city, away from all the trees and weeds, the opposite appears to be true. Similar results have been observed outside the lab: In downtown Baltimore, where it’s 3˚C warmer and contains 30 percent more carbon dioxide than the countryside, ragweed “thrived, growing bigger and puffing out larger plumes of pollen than its country counterpart,” reported Rachel Becker in The Verge.

Ragweed may thrive in our cities, but there’s a bigger—and taller—problem: The trees planted to provide shade and beauty are making our allergies worse.

“Many people believe that the more trees you have in a city’s green infrastructure, the more they act as a biofilter,” said Amena Warner of Allergy UK, as reported by The Ashland Chronicle. “But are they the right kind of trees? In urban areas, particularly in London, there’s a lean towards planting birch trees, which are highly allergenic. When they’re in cities, people can’t escape the pollen easily, and it’s virtually indestructible unless it’s wet.”

That means the pollen that collects on your clothes, on the bottom of your shoes, and in your hair during your afternoon stroll could plague you until it rains or is washed away. That, says Warner, extends the time you’re in contact with pollen, even out of pollen season. The UK has the third-highest rates of allergic rhinitis and asthma prevalence globally, which is why Allergy UK is deeply concerned about this issue.

“It’s important that the right tree is planted in the right place,” said Warner. “We want to raise awareness of why planting allergenic birch trees in urban areas can increase hay fever and other respiratory conditions.”

So, if we know that pollen from birch trees (and many others) causes allergic reactions, why are they still prevalent on our city streets? “Mainly because they seem to be fashionable,” said Warner. “They have this lovely silvery bark, and they’re long and graceful with a beautiful sweeping canopy that gently sways in the wind. And they don’t drop fruit—in a city, you want trees with a low cleanup cost.”

Keeping Hay Fever at Bay

There are alternatives; not all tree pollen is allergenic. In 2010, a report by the National Wildlife Federation called on states, communities, and homeowners to “undertake smart community planning and landscaping with attention to allergenic plants and urban heat island effects to limit the amount of pollen and other allergens that become airborne.”

One way to mitigate the impact of hay fever in cities would be to utilize the Ogren Plant Allergy Scale (OPALS), which rates trees based on allergen level. When choosing your tree, whether it’s in your garden or on the street, opt for a low-allergen variety that won’t trigger sneezing.

As the climate continues to change and we see an increase in hay fever, we’ll also notice a bigger impact on public health, not least because an estimated 30 percent of people with allergic rhinitis develop asthma later on. While urban planning may be beyond our control, there are some steps we can take to mitigate the pollen problem.

David Mizejewski, a naturalist at the National Wildlife Federation and a long-time allergy sufferer, gave readers of the Federation’s 2010 report some advice:

– Get an allergy test—that way, you can decide when it is best to go outside

– Ask your doctor about allergens and what medication to take

– Check daily pollen counts and go out when they’re low

– Wash your clothes and yourself to remove trapped pollen, and use nasal sprays

– Choose non-allergenic plants for your garden

– Plant female trees and shrubs (it’s the males that produce pollen)

It’s important to remember that people with allergic rhinitis can develop asthma, which can be serious. So, if your symptoms start to affect your breathing, it’s best to consult a doctor.

This article was produced by Earth | Food | Life, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Lucy Goodchild van Hilten is a contributor to the Observatory and a writing fellow for Earth | Food | Life, a project of the Independent Media Institute. Find her online at telllucy.com and follow her on Twitter @LucyGoodchild.

Defending Ancestral Forests from Corporate Plunder: Boki Women Lead the Way

June 9, 2025
Source: Degrowth.info


Boki women in the forest. Source: Francis Annagu

In Boki land, the roar of chainsaws is now the sound of cultural erasure. Over the last five decades, the forests of this ancestral area, situated in Cross River State, Nigeria, have endured relentless plunder through timber extraction, but also the trafficking of wildlife, with many species now endangered or already extinct. This destruction strikes at the heart of Boki women, who have for centuries sustained their families through traditional harvesting of bush mangoes, nuts, and vegetables. These forest gifts once served as living archives of wealth, identity, and intergenerational memory, but not anymore. Under the suffocating march of corporate extractivism, these Indigenous lifestyles are being replaced by the cold calculus of exploitation.
The Architects of Ecocide

The destruction of Boki’s rainforests unfolds like a slow-motion crisis, one fueled by a web of entrenched interests. Timber cartels, often armed, operate with impunity. Alongside them, industrial-scale loggers such as the Chinese logging companies carve through the forests, leaving behind a scarred landscape where thriving ecosystems once stood. These actors are not rogue elements but function within a permissive system, shaped by weak environmental governance, global market demand, and the commodification of natural resources, that prioritizes profit over people. The consequences ripple far beyond felled trees. Deforestation here exacerbates global warming and deepens human insecurity; reminders that environmental harm knows no borders. For the Boki women, the loss is both immediate and intimate. Denied access to the forests that sustained their livelihoods, they can no longer gather wild nuts or cultivate crops without intimidation. Their exclusion from forest governance is rooted in long-standing gendered power relations and a history of top-down decision-making by government forest authorities, compounded by policies that fail to institutionalize women’s land rights, leaving Boki women without legal land titles and making it easier to ignore their rights. Their exclusion from decision-making highlights a painful irony: those most affected are often least heard.

Who, then, is responsible for the destruction of Boki’s ecosystem? Chinese logging companies, who carry out industrial-scale felling of timber for export, spearhead this destruction under the guise of “selective logging”, a euphemism for the monstrous targeting of high-value trees like iroko and African cedar. These species, once pillars of the forest’s ecological and cultural architecture, are now corpses hauled away on trucks. What once sustained collective life for generations has now become a battleground, where pristine forests are traded under shadowy deals. What’s more, the government’s silence is deafening, while local authorities have been accused of being involved in illegal logging. The same system expected to fight forest destruction, is found culpable.

Since 2002, Nigeria has always been at the mercy of China. How? China has invested in infrastructure and lent funds to Nigeria, to fuel industrial growth and secure access to raw materials. Chinese-owned interests are fueling the felling of hardwood for export to China in a record 1.4 million logs. It has been uncovered how Chinese nationals forged land deeds with the help of corrupt local chiefs, erasing ancestral claims to customary land ownership with the stroke of a pen. Though the government retains the authority to acquire such land for public purposes under the Land Use Act of 1978, its customary tenure persists as an Indigenous and legal reality. This system stands in contrast to Western conceptions of land ownership, which are predominantly individualistic and exclusionary in nature. The loss in Boki is existential; an erasure of an entire people’s way of life. In the past, the Boki people across different villages have enjoyed peaceful co–existence and remarkable cultural harmony. Beginning on August 18 each year, the New Yam Festival gathers many farmers – both men and women – to thank the Boki god for a good harvest. Women cook Eru, Egusi and bitter leaf soups with leaves fetched from the forests, with dancing, drinking of palm wine, and the feeding of visitors. But this culture, which fostered bonds, unity, and communal sense, is no longer as vibrant or widely practiced as it was decades ago, before logging overshadowed the milieu.
The Frontline of Banyinyi Boki Women’s Association

Yet, amid this plunder of everything we know as ecological systems, the Banyinyi Boki Women’s Association has emerged not merely as nature’s protectors, but as architects of an alternative future. Rooted in a tradition where community and sustainability converge, the Boki women wove their resistance into something enduring. In 1959, the Banyinyi Women’s Association, a pan-sociocultural institution with the mandate to preserve Boki culture, was formed to encourage Boki women’s sociocultural role in community development and the promotion of inter-village/clan cooperation. Over time, its responsibilities have widened, and today, the women’s association also plays a vital role in combating deforestation in the Boki rainforest.

On the frontlines of environmental defense, the women of the Banyinyi Boki association stage peaceful protests, a steadfast refusal to let their forests fall to complete destruction. Week after week, they gather, their very presence challenges both state and local authorities. But their resistance runs deeper than marches. In village squares and homesteads, they mobilize neighbors, building a grassroots network that demands tougher laws and real enforcement to shield Boki’s land. Their tools? Not just petitions – but persistence, solidarity, and strategy. Yet they know isolation is a losing strategy. They reach beyond their community, forging alliances with environmental NGOs. These partnerships become megaphones, amplifying their call against illegal logging until it echoes in halls of power far from their trees.

Unlike logging companies that see forests as commodities, Boki women understand them differently, as living systems: a reciprocal bond exists between the Boki women and the forest, rooted in respect, care, and interdependence, not extraction. The women’s resistance, rooted in reclaiming over 23,000 hectares of forestland decimated annually by corporate hunger, stages nothing short of a quiet revolution. From an ecocentric perspective, their struggle is part of a global reckoning, one that confronts authorities with the fatal flaws in modernity’s relationship with nature. Against the onslaught of extractive capitalism, the Banyinyi Boki Women’s Association fosters sororal bonds and voluntary solidarity, standing in stark contrast to exploitation.
The Banyinyi’s Methods

While some efforts focus on restoration, others confront destruction head-on. One of Banyinyi’s leaders and activists, Florence Kekong, embodies this spirit of reciprocal relationships with nature. In 2022, her reforestation project, where women planted bird’s eye pepper to attract seed-dispersing birds, became an act of ecological healing. “The birds are our partners,” she explains. “They replant the forest for us.” We can feel how this traditional knowledge, refined over generations, stands in stark contrasts to privately owned monoculture plantations that have degraded biodiversity.

The Banyinyi’s enforcement of state forest laws is equally innovative. When a Nigerian man was caught felling trees in 2020, the Boki women’s public shaming, parading him through the village with his confiscated chainsaw, was a performance of community justice. But could Chinese loggers face similar consequences? Unlikely. While local timber gangs operate under the threat of violence, the Chinese exploit something more insidious: the silent armor of state influence, secret deals with complicit chiefs, and the institutionalized impunity of systems built to shield power. For the Boki women, this imbalance isn’t just unjust – it’s paralyzing. How do you hold accountable an entity that exists beyond reach, protected by layers of state privilege?

More than an act of discipline, the Boki women’s shaming of the caught logger, exposed the absurdity of outdated environmental laws, where fines of one Naira (0.60 €) mock the gravity of punishment. “The law is a ghost,” Florence remarked. “We are the real protectors.” When confronting the chainsaw operator in 2020, they invoked a ritual – traditionally used to shame thieves – by tying forest vines around his waist while chanting: “You who cut the mother’s limbs, shall wear her scars.” Since state laws have failed Boki’s forests, this act of defiance exposes a deeper truth: the fight for environmental justice demands radical legal transformations, replacing exploitative systems with ecological law, rooted in interdependence and justice.
Decolonizing Environmental Justice

Like the Boki women defending forests, this vision rejects anthropocentric hierarchies, instead centering place-based governance and Indigenous wisdom. Their struggle forces us to ask: can we shift from exploiting nature to learning from it? The answer may determine not only the fate of their forest but also our collective future.

Maureen Osang, Public Relations Officer for Banyinyi Boki, explains the deep ecological knowledge passed down through generations of Boki women: “For centuries, Boki women have interacted closely with the forest because we’ve depended solely on organic foods. We had cocoyam grown on grasslands, a rich local bean called Otshe, and a special kind of melon known as Esambye that grows only in the forest. There are also many mushrooms we gather. In those days, women didn’t rely on meat like beef or cow – they thrived on local beans, Dawadawa, and mushrooms.”

This intimate relationship reflects a sustainable way of life. Boki women know how to harvest without damaging roots or overexploiting resources. They follow seasonal rhythms, leave parts of the forest fallow, and transmit this wisdom through daily practices and oral storytelling, sustaining a delicate balance between use and preservation.

In a conversation with His Royal Highness Ata Otu Fredalin Akandu, chief of Boki land, he echoed this connection to the forest’s abundance. “Our forests are full of wildlife, snails, for example. When women go to the farm, they pick snails along the way, left and right, and by the time they return, they may have ten snails to cook soup.”

Chief Akandu also described the forest’s vital ecological services: cold spring water for drinking, clean air, and rich biodiversity. “It’s in Boki that you find endangered species like gorillas, drill monkeys, and chimpanzees in the Afi mountains. They tell us that in all of West Africa, the only remaining rainforest is in the Cross River state – and especially in Boki.”

In this light, therefore, the ecological activism of the Boki women pushes back the environmental tragedy of sacrificing human-nature harmony for short-term gain.
The Future: A Radical Reimagining of Power

If Indigenous knowledge holds answers, what stands in the way? Digging deeper reveals a provocative truth: perhaps our collective survival requires not just resistance, but a fundamental reimagining of power. After all, how can you negotiate with a system built to erase you from your ancestral land via forest annihilation? The Boki women know this. Their strength and collective well-being lie in shared vision, in resurrecting something that is, in fact, ancient: the sovereignty of collective care. When they shame loggers or replant bird-eye pepper to enlist birds as allies, they are resisting the destructive system while also giving rise to its replacement.

This is the true battleground. The struggle in Boki is not between development and conservation, but between two ways of being human: one that sees forests as warehouses of commodities, and another that recognizes them as kin. In this light, the women’s fruitful efforts are not stopgap measures. They are the first threads of a pluriversal future, where economies mirror ecosystems – regenerative, reciprocal, and rooted in place. As ecosystems collapse, communities and eco activists across the continent of Africa are advancing this shift – not as idealism, but as survival.

As Boki’s forests disappear in plain sight, the deeper crisis is not deforestation alone – it is neglect. The world watches, largely indifferent, while the Banyinyi women’s struggle keeps echoing a painful truth: we do not lack solutions, we lack the courage to abandon the myths of progress that blind us to them.

This article is part of a series on movements for social and environmental justice worldwide. Find out more and read the other pieces of the series here.

Francis Annagu
  is an environmental activist and journalist from Nigeria. He has received grants from the Pulitzer Center, Africa-China Reporting Project, Tiger Eye Foundation, and Rainforest Journalism Fund. He is a former fellow of the Code for Africa Fellowship, funded by Global Forest Watch with support from the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.

 

Europe’s industrial policy worsens the crises it claims to solve




Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Facebook




The European Union’s industrial strategy, centred on Single Market Resilience, Strategic Autonomy, and Competitive Sustainability, is riddled with contradictions that risk exacerbating the very crises it seeks to address. According to a recent study by the Institute for Environmental Science and Technology of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB), the EU’s current industrial policy will not achieve its own objectives unless it is fundamentally rethought.

Resilience can only be achieved by strengthening foundational sectors such as healthcare, housing, care, and public transport—which together account for nearly 40% of employment in Europe. The study warns that such resilience will remain out of reach unless there is a commitment to public investment, better working conditions, and vocational training aligned with social needs.

The research, led by Jason Hickel (ICTA-UAB), Richard Bärnthaler (University of Leeds), and Sebastian Mang (New Economics Foundation), argues that strategic autonomy requires a substantial reduction in material and energy demand. Current policies, such as the Critical Raw Materials Act, promote expanded resource extraction, which could heighten geopolitical tensions and fuel conflicts within Europe over extractive activities. Drawing on findings from low-energy demand scenarios, the study highlights that Europe could cut its energy demand in half by 2050—making energy independence possible and significantly reducing import dependencies.

Moreover, the research critiques the current approach to the green transition, which relies heavily on market-based incentives such as public subsidies, guarantees, and deregulation. “This model encourages innovation, but it fails to include exnovation—the intentional phase-out of unsustainable technologies and infrastructures—thereby reinforcing structural inertia”, says Jason Hickel, ICTA-UAB researcher. The EU currently lacks effective mechanisms to shut down carbon-intensive sectors, realign private capital with public priorities, and steer production toward social well-being. The authors argue that without stronger public planning, credit guidance, and greater public ownership—particularly in the energy and finance sectors—the green transition will be too slow, too fragmented, and overly dependent on profit margins.

“We are living in a century of overlapping crises—climate, social, energy, and geopolitical. Industrial policy is back, but it is not equipped for this reality. There is no coherent strategy to strengthen essential public services or to significantly reduce material and energy use,” said Richard Bärnthaler, assistant professor at the University of Leeds.

Jason Hickel warned that “efficiency alone is not enough in growth-driven economies. Technological gains are often offset by rising production. If Europe is serious about decarbonisation and strategic autonomy, it must scale down non-essential, resource-intensive sectors directly. Current EU industrial policy does not address this”.

Sebastian Mang, political economist at the New Economics Foundation, added: “The EU says it wants resilience, autonomy, and sustainability—but it’s using the wrong tools. We need ambitious public investment, coordination between central banks and governments, and democratic control over resource allocation. Without placing care, climate, and equity at the centre, this industrial policy will stay off course.”

As a way forward, the authors call for a fundamental rebalancing of Europe’s industrial strategy around three core priorities: strengthening foundational sectors such as care, public transport, and affordable housing; embedding demand reduction as a structural principle for strategic autonomy; and expanding green economic planning through public credit guidance, monetary-fiscal coordination, enhanced fiscal capacity, and increased public ownership—especially in energy and finance.