Wednesday, July 09, 2025

 

Four newly-discovered species of cave-dwelling pseudoscorpions have jaws like dragons and are completely blind

Peer-Reviewed Publication

PLOS

Four new species of dragon pseudoscorpions (Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudotyrannochthoniidae: Spelaeochthonius) from caves in South Korea revealed by integrative taxonomy 

image: 

Phylogenetic analyses of Spelaeochthonius shed light on species diversity and the biogeographical complexity of this genus.

view more 

Credit: Jeong et al., CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Four newly-discovered species of cave-dwelling pseudoscorpions have jaws like dragons and are completely blind

Article URLhttp://plos.io/4nokr8D

Article title: Four new species of dragon pseudoscorpions (Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudotyrannochthoniidae: Spelaeochthonius) from caves in South Korea revealed by integrative taxonomy

Author countries: Republic of Korea, Germany, South Africa.

Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (NIBR202502102). There was no additional external funding received for this study.

 

Five common cancers (lung, stomach, colorectal, liver, and breast) occur more often in communities with low employment rates or low incomes, per analysis of 16 years of data on Japanese adults





PLOS
Association between socioeconomic background and cancer: An ecological study using cancer registry and various community socioeconomic status indicators in Kanagawa, Japan 

image: 

Association of lower morbidity or mortality with higher community socioeconomic status.

view more 

Credit: Hiroto Narimatsu, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)






Five common cancers (lung, stomach, colorectal, liver, and breast) occur more often in communities with low employment rates or low incomes, per analysis of 16 years of data on Japanese adults

Article URLhttp://plos.io/4envdYN

Article title: Association between socioeconomic background and cancer: An ecological study using cancer registry and various community socioeconomic status indicators in Kanagawa, Japan

Author countries: Japan

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

 

Loneliness predicts poor mental and physical health outcomes



Survey data collected from nearly 50,000 people in the U.S. found that 4 in 5 report some loneliness, with levels strongly correlated with poor mental health days, and poor physical health days




PLOS

The impact of loneliness on depression, mental health, and physical well-being 

image: 

Loneliness is common and is a strong and independent predictor of depression and poor health outcomes, according to new study.

view more 

Credit: Image credit: Dr. Oluwasegun Akinyemi, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)





Loneliness is common and is a strong and independent predictor of depression and poor health outcomes, according to a new study published July 9, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS One by Dr. Oluwasegun Akinyemi, a Senior Research Fellow at the Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, U.S.

Loneliness has emerged as a significant public health concern in the United States, with profound implications for mental and physical health. In the new study, researchers analyzed Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data collected via phone surveys between 2016 and 2023. The study population included 47,318 non-institutionalized adults living in the U.S., predominantly White (73.3%) and female (62.1%), and aged 18-64 years (72.1%).

More than 80% of participants reported some level of loneliness. Compared to those who reported “Never” being lonely, individuals who reported being “Always” lonely had a significantly higher predicted probability of depression (50.2% vs. 9.7%, p<0.001), had on average 10.9 more poor mental health days per month (20 vs. 9.4), and 5.0 more poor physical health days per month (all p<0.001). Women consistently experienced a higher likelihood of depression and more poor mental health days than men across loneliness levels, and Black individuals had lower probabilities of depression and fewer mental health days than White individuals across loneliness levels.

The study was limited by the reliance on self-reported measures as well as possible bias from unmeasured confounders such as personality traits or life events. However, the authors state that the findings of the study carry urgent policy and practice implications. They suggest that loneliness should be prioritized alongside traditional risk factors in public health planning and that routine loneliness screenings in clinical settings could help identify high-risk individuals for interventions such as social initiatives.

The authors add: “Our study highlights that loneliness is not just an emotional state—it has measurable consequences for both mental and physical health. Addressing loneliness may be a critical public health priority to reduce depression and improve overall well-being.”

“Conducting this research allowed us to explore the lived experiences of many individuals in vulnerable situations. What stood out most was how strongly loneliness affected every aspect of health—underscoring the urgency of tackling this hidden epidemic.” 

 

 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Onehttp://plos.io/4l2J8Gh

Citation: Akinyemi O, Abdulrazaq W, Fasokun M, Ogunyankin F, Ikugbayigbe S, Nwosu U, et al. (2025) The impact of loneliness on depression, mental health, and physical well-being. PLoS One 20(7): e0319311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319311

Author countries: U.S.

Funding: This project was supported (in part) by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 2U54MD007597. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

FDA-approved drugs could make 

nano-medicine safer, study finds

A study led by researchers at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus looks to improve access to life-saving therapies for more patients


University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus






An international study led by researchers at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus has identified a promising strategy to enhance the safety of nanomedicines, advanced therapies often used in cancer and vaccine treatments, by using drugs already approved by the FDA for unrelated conditions.

The study was published today in Science Advances.

Their research suggests that repurposing existing medications can reduce harmful immune responses associated with nanoparticles. These ultra-small particles are designed to deliver treatments with precision but, in some cases, the immune system can react adversely.

“Nanoparticles are powerful tools in medicine, but the body often recognizes them as threats,” said Dmitri Simberg, PhD, co-director and professor at the Colorado Center for Nanomedicine and Nanosafety at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at CU Anschutz and lead author of the study. “We found that certain existing drugs used for immune-related conditions can help mitigate these reactions.”

When introduced into the body for therapy or imaging, nanoparticles can trigger inflammation and other immune-related side effects. This occurs when the immune system, particularly the complement system, a group of blood proteins responsible for detecting potential threats, mistakenly targets helpful nanoparticles.

“This system is crucial for fighting infections, but it can become overactive in response to nanomedicine,” Simberg explained.

These overreactions may cause symptoms such as skin rashes, respiratory distress, cardiovascular problems or serious anaphylactic reactions. To address this, the team tested immune-modulating compounds that inhibit complement activation, aiming to reduce immune attacks on nanoparticles without broadly weakening the immune system.

Among the drugs tested in blood samples, iptacopan, currently approved to treat certain rare blood, nerve, and kidney disorders, was notably effective in blocking complement activity and minimizing adverse effects.

“We were impressed by how well iptacopan performed in preclinical animal models and some human samples,” said Simberg. “It not only reduced immune responses but also prevented more severe symptoms.”

The researchers also noted considerable variability in how individuals respond to nanoparticle-based treatments, often depending on specific ingredients used. This highlights the importance of personalized approaches to nanomedicine.

“We still need to understand which patients are at higher risk of allergic or inflammatory reactions, in order to apply immune modulating drugs during nanomedicine treatment,” Simberg added.

Simberg said the findings open the door to broader and safer applications of nanomedicine for diseases such as cancer, infections and genetic conditions.

“If we can manage the body’s response more effectively, we can improve access to these life-saving therapies for a wider group of patients,” said Simberg.

The collaborative study involved scientists from both the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Cardiff University, and Newcastle University in the United Kingdom.

 

About the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus is a world-class medical destination at

the forefront of transformative science, medicine, education and patient care. The

campus encompasses the University of Colorado health professional schools, more than 60

centers and institutes and two nationally ranked independent hospitals - UCHealth University

of Colorado Hospital and Children's Hospital Colorado – which see more than two million

adult and pediatric patient visits yearly. Innovative, interconnected and highly collaborative,

the CU Anschutz Medical Campus delivers life-changing treatments, patient care and

professional training and conducts world-renowned research fueled by $910 million in annual

research funding, including $757 million in sponsored awards and $153 million in

philanthropic gifts.

 

 

Many seafloor fish communities are retaining their individuality despite human impacts



Fishing and temperature shifts, however, have caused some regions in the ocean to lose diversity



PLOS




Despite widespread human impacts to wildlife diversity worldwide, many fish communities on the seafloor have maintained their uniqueness, reports a new study led by Zoë Kitchel, formerly of Rutgers University, and colleagues, published July 9 in the open-access journal PLOS Climate.

 Around the world, humans have transformed ecosystems through development, hunting and fishing, invasive species and climate change. On land and in freshwater ecosystems, these changes have typically led to a process called homogenization, where the types of organisms living in different areas become more similar over time, as native species are replaced with introduced species and species good at tolerating human activity. However, previously it was unclear whether this same trend was occurring in ocean ecosystems.

 Kitchel and a large group of collaborators looked at data from scientific fish trawling surveys to identify trends in seafloor fish diversity over time. These surveys included more than 175,000 samples composed of 2,006 fish species living on the seafloor from 34 regions and spanning six decades. The researchers saw that while almost one third of the examined regions showed homogenization, another third actually had an increase in diversity. The remaining 15 regions did not show a clear trend in homogenization over time, with some areas showing big swings in diversity between years. Further analysis showed that temperatures and the amount of fishing that occurred in the region helped explain some of the shifts in similarity across years and locations.

 Overall, the new findings show that, despite intense human impacts on the oceans, the majority of seafloor fish communities do not follow the worldwide trend of homogenization that has occurred in other environments. The research team suggested that future studies could look at terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems to see if they experience similar swings in diversity. They also concluded that, due to the differences in homogenization they observed across different locations, conservation efforts should be tailored specifically to each region to be most effective.

 The authors summarize: "Globalization and land-use change has led to widespread homogenization (or the loss of unique combinations of species) across freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. However, until this study, we were mostly in the dark about whether the oceans were also experiencing this loss of uniqueness across space. We found that overall, communities of fish living on soft-bottom habitat on continental shelves worldwide are not uniformly homogenizing. Rather, trends in diversity are regionally specific with locations such as the western Atlantic experiencing homogenization in contrast to places such as Portugal and Greenland experiencing an opposite trend towards elevated uniqueness…[w]e found that community composition is highly dynamic through time, varying from a more homogenized to more heterogeneous state and back again over the course of a few years. This suggests that these communities of fish are resilient to environmental change." 

Dr Kitchel adds: “The long list of co-authors is indicative of the highly collaborative nature of this project. We were able to test for evidence of homogenization across diverse marine shelf ecosystems because of the contributions and knowledge of fisheries biologists from across the world through the FISHGLOB consortium. FISHGLOB is an international consortium of scientists, experts and data providers who collect, curate, standardize, share, and analyse data from scientific bottom trawl surveys (SBTS). By facilitating open and multinational science, the consortium's activities enable the understanding and prediction of fish diversity change and help to guide management actions. SBTS are one of the most widespread and long-running forms of ocean ecosystem monitoring, providing invaluable time-series of marine fish biodiversity over decades of global change."

###

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Climatehttps://plos.io/45YgWjf

Citation: Kitchel ZJ, Maureaud AA, Fredston A, Shackell N, Mérigot B, Thorson JT, et al. (2025) Marine communities do not follow the paradigm of increasing similarity through time. PLOS Clim 4(7): e0000659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000659

Author Countries: Canada, Chile, Croatia, Germany, France, Iceland, Italy, Malta, Namibia, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Funding: This project was part of the FISHGLOB working group, ‘Fish biodiversity under global change: a worldwide assessment from scientific trawl surveys’, co-funded by the Centre for the Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB) of the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB), the Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution (CIEE), and the French embassy in Canada (to MLDP & BM). Other support was provided by U.S. National Science Foundation grants #DEB-1616821 (to ZJK & MLP), #OISE-1743711 (to ZJK & MLP), and #CBET-2137701 (MLP); the Rutgers School of Environmental and Biological Sciences (to ZJK); the Rutgers Ecology and Evolution Graduate Program (to ZJK); a Rutgers Coastal Climate Risk and Resilience Traineeship (to ZJK); the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (CRRSAA)/Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund II (HEERF II) (to ZJK); and The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Partnership Grant (to JPA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

 

Somali women’s perspectives on female genital mutilation and its abandonment



Somalia has the highest rate of FGM/C globally, with 98 percent of women affected




PLOS

Somali women’s perspectives on female genital mutilation and its abandonment 

image: 

Little girls playing under a "Yaq" tree represent hope, resilience and connection to the community roots, Kismayo, Somalia

view more 

Credit: Dr. Zamzam I. A. Ali, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)





Somali women describe a complex and shifting tradition of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) in Somalia, according to a study published July 9, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS Global Public Health by Zamzam I.A. Ali from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK and the Mayo Clinic, US, and colleagues. 

Female genital mutilation/cutting, which increases the risks of immediate and long-term psychological, obstetric, genitourinary and sexual and reproductive health complications, has no health benefits. It continues to be a human rights issue globally, with the UN and the Human Rights Council calling for a complete end to the practice. Somalia has the highest estimated rate of FGM/C worldwide, with 98 percent of women 15-49 affected, and has deep roots in Somali cultural traditions. In this study, Ali and colleagues explored Somali women’s perspectives on FGM/C and efforts to support its abandonment in Somalia.

In 2022, the authors interviewed 20 adult Somali women ranging in age from 18-80, with diverse backgrounds in terms of education, marital status, and socioeconomic status.

Most participants were familiar with FGM/C, with many defining FGM/C as a “stage all girls go through”. Participants referred to both “gudniinka fircooniga” (translated as “pharaonic circumcision,” equivalent to infibulation of the genitalia by surgically narrowing the vaginal opening) and “gudniinka sunnah” (translated as “religiously sanctioned” or “good” circumcision—descriptions of this type of FGM/C varied from a prick or nick to the genitals to complete removal of the external clitoris). Many participants described FGM/C in terms relating to belonging to religious beliefs and Somali culture (“The whole culture in Somalia, whether it’s in politics or government, they still believe in [FGM/C]”), patriarchal/social/familial pressure (“If a man was given a girl [married to an uncircumcised maiden], he will say ‘She is not a girl [virgin]...’ He thinks it [the vagina] is this area that is completely closed and needs to be reopened. So, he thinks this is the right way. It [sexual intercourse] is difficult for him and it is difficult for her, but he says ‘I want it this way.’”;“We went through this, and our girls will take the same path”) and social coercion/discrimination (“I just wanted to be like everyone else, like just not to feel like I’m the odd one out”). All participants supported abandonment of “pharaonic” FGM/C due to its many harms. However, many participants supported continuation of “gudniinka sunnah,” particularly non-educated and moderately educated women: “The Sunnah you hear is not something problematic. It is just bleeding the girl a little bit. No problem in that.” Most university-educated participants described a zero-tolerance stance: “I don’t support it at all because you know Allah made us whole [..]. It’s not a mistake and we deserve to be whole and so I don’t support it at all.”

When asked to reflect on FGM/C abandonment, participants described changing community norms, particularly through the spread of education: “In the past, many Somalis did it, but recently people lost interest in it, and they are becoming better. Not like in the past. People started to understand and change”. The authors note that while health education may be contributing to changing attitudes towards FGM/C in Somalia, it’s likely insufficient to enact meaningful change—for that, active engagement of a range of community stakeholders will be required.

Lead author Zamzam Ali adds: "This project impacted me deeply and helped me understand the 'why'—the driving force that kept this practice alive from one generation to another in Somalia. Women were the main victims, yet they were also the promoters and champions for the continuation of FGM in the community. Any intervention targeting this issue should start with a deep understanding and involve them in the conversation. I hope this work becomes the start of more open, vulnerable, and honest conversations in our community about FGM and a step closer toward its elimination."

###

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Global Public Healthhttps://plos.io/3I9WNgh

Citation: Ali ZIA, Alhaffar M, Howard N (2025) “I just wanted to be like everyone else…”: Qualitative exploration of women’s perspectives on female genital mutilation/cutting and its potential abandonment in Somalia. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(7): e0004571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004571

Author Countries: Singapore, United Kingdom, United States

Funding: Chevening Scholarships provided funding for ZA’s MSc studies, though no direct study costs. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.