Wednesday, July 16, 2025

How Canada’s oil sands transformed into one of North America’s lowest-cost plays


By Reuters
Published: July 16, 2025 

An oil sands facility seen from a helicopter near Fort McMurray, Alta.
 (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Giant shovels, driverless trucks and a dog-like robot have all helped Canada’s oil sands companies including Imperial Oil and Suncor become some of North America’s lowest-cost oil producers, driving down overheads even as the worst inflation in a generation pushed U.S. shale costs up.

As the global oil industry enters a downturn due to economic uncertainty related to U.S. tariffs policy and OPEC+ pumping more barrels, Canada’s oil sands industry finds itself in a position of strength.Stay on top of your portfolio with real-time data, historical charts and the latest news on oil

In the years following the oil price crash of 2014-15, international oil majors including BP, Chevron and Total sold their interests in Canadian oil sands. At the time, they classified the Canadian operations as among their more expensive, and therefore less profitable, projects worldwide. They directed their capital to cheaper oil production, and favoured U.S. shale for its quicker drilling time and returns.

Since then, new technology and cost-cutting efforts have driven meaningful improvement in the industry’s competitiveness that make oil sands among the cheapest producers, according to a dozen industry insiders and a Reuters analysis of the latest U.S. and Canadian company earnings.

While U.S. shale companies are responding to this year’s oil price downturn by dropping rigs, slashing capital spending and laying off workers, the oil sands’ position of strength means Canadian companies have made virtually no changes to their previously announced production or spending plans.

Some Canadian politicians are now calling for a new crude pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific coast, as part of a broader effort to strengthen the country’s economy in the face of U.S. tariff threats.

The lower crude prices this year have little impact on the Canadian oil sector, Cenovus CEO Jon McKenzie said in an interview earlier this year. “This is an industry that has become much more resilient through time,” he said.

In one example, two four-legged robots— each nicknamed Spot because of their dog-like appearance — prowl Imperial’s vast 45-year-old Cold Lake operation in Alberta, conducting routine equipment inspections and maintenance such as heat exchanger optimizations, and oil/water tank interface monitoring. The Spots free up human workers for other work and save Imperial $30 million (US$22 million) a year, the company said.

Exxon-owned Imperial and its competitor Suncor have also switched to autonomous mining vehicles, eliminating the need to hire drivers to transport oil sands ore. The switch has improved oil output productivity at Imperial’s Kearl oil sands mine by 20 per cent since 2023, the company said.

Suncor operates a 900-tonne truck at its Fort Hills operation north of Fort McMurray, Alberta, which the company says is the world’s largest hydraulic mining shovel. Suncor CEO Rich Kruger said the shovel’s larger bucket and more powerful digging force deliver faster ore loading and less spillage.

Oil sands producers have also made improvements in equipment reliability and performance. At Kearl, for example, Imperial has reduced expenses related to turnarounds — an industry term for the costly periods of required maintenance that often involve temporarily shutting down production — by $100 million annually since 2021. The company cut the time between turnarounds from 12 to 24 months in 2024, and aims to extend that interval to 48 months in future.

Suncor credits efforts including standardizing maintenance practices across mines and improving management of site water to get more production out of existing assets for contributing to the company’s US$7 per barrel reduction in its West Texas Intermediate (WTI) break-even price in 2024 to $42.90.

This long-term focus on cost-cutting means Canada’s five biggest oil sands companies can break even — and still maintain their dividends — at WTI prices between $43.10 and $40.85, according to a Bank of Montreal analysis for Reuters.

That means oil sands producers have lowered their overall costs by approximately $10 a barrel in about seven years. Oil sands had an average break-even price of $51.80/bbl between 2017 and 2019, according to BMO.

In contrast, a recent Dallas Federal Reserve survey of over 100 oil and gas companies in Texas, New Mexico and Louisiana found that shale oil producers need a WTI oil price of $65 per barrel on average to profitably drill. Back in 2017-2019, U.S. shale producers had a break-even price of between $50 and $52 per barrel.

High startup costs, but long lifespans

Part of the reason that the oil sands industry has become so cost competitive is the nature of the extraction process. Producing the thick, sticky oil that is found in the sands of Alberta is in some locations more akin to mining than oil drilling.

Where the oil is very close to the surface, companies operate massive mines, scraping up huge volumes of sand and clay and then filtering out the oil. When the oil is deeper, companies inject steam underground to loosen the deposits and then use a drilling process.

An oil sands mine has big initial start-up costs but once it is operational, it can run for decades with very low production decline rates. Canadian Natural Resources, for example, at the end of 2024 had proved and probable reserves amounting to 20.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent in its portfolio, giving its oil sands mining and upgrading assets a remaining reserve lifespan of 43 years. The company’s Horizon oil sands mine has been producing since 2009.

Shale oil wells, by contrast, have low start up costs. Oil output from the wells, however, begins to decline within months. Prices have begun to climb because after years of heavy drilling in the top shale fields, the most productive areas have been exhausted. Drillers are moving onto secondary areas, so they have to drill more wells to achieve the same output and that has driven up costs.

Canadian oil sands companies have also paid down debt in the past five years, allowing them to reallocate profits away from shoring up their balance sheets and towards rewarding shareholders with dividends and buybacks.

According to the Bank of Montreal, oil sands producers Canadian Natural Resources, Suncor, Cenovus, Imperial Oil and MEG Energy currently have combined net debt, excluding lease liabilities, of $33.9 billion after paying down a combined total of almost $22 billion in debt between 2021 and 2024.

As returns grow, Canadian oil sands producers are an increasingly attractive investment for those looking to make money from the energy industry, said Kevin Burkett, portfolio manager with Vancouver-based Burkett Asset Management.

“(Canada’s oil sands) are not geopolitically risky, and they have some very appealing characteristics around productivity and costs,” said Burkett, who has shares of Canadian Natural Resources and Cenovus in his portfolio.

(Reporting by Amanda Stephenson; Editing by Caroline Stauffer and Anna Driver)

 

UK Extends Renewable Energy Contracts to 20 Years in Latest CfD Overhaul

The UK government has confirmed it will extend the length of its renewable energy contracts—from 15 years to 20—under the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme. This change, confirmed July 15, kicks in with Allocation Round 7 (AR7), opening for bids in August 2025, and applies to solar, onshore wind, offshore wind, and floating offshore wind technologies.

The CfD scheme, the government’s flagship program for supporting low-carbon electricity, offers developers a guaranteed price for the power they generate. By stretching the contract period to 20 years, the UK hopes to lower developers’ cost of capital and—eventually—pass those savings on to consumers. Whether those savings materialize in practice, however, remains to be seen.

According to the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, longer contracts will help balance the high upfront costs of renewable infrastructure with more predictable, longer-term returns. The government argues this will smooth out the cost curve of the energy transition and help maintain momentum toward its Clean Power 2030 goals, especially as electricity demand balloons in the coming decades.

The change follows industry lobbying and months of consultation, with a majority of developers arguing that 15-year contracts no longer reflected market realities—especially amid volatile power prices, rising interest rates, and growing exposure to negative pricing.

Critically, the government insists that the extended term will not change the indexation metric—payments will remain pegged to the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Critics of the plan argue that stretching the CfD contracts to 20 years could just be a backdoor subsidy expansion that lock consumers into longer payment periods that might not actually deliver better value. Should wholesale electricity prices drop signfiicantly after year 15 (as many predict), consumers could end up overpaying during the final five years of the contract.

Alongside the contract extension, the AR7 overhaul includes other developer-friendly reforms: floating offshore wind projects will get special budget support, solar PV projects will enjoy a longer commissioning window, and offshore wind bidders no longer need full planning consent to participate—just a 12-month planning track record.

All told, AR7 represents a recalibration of risk, return, and red tape in favor of getting more steel—and solar—in the ground faster. Whether this results in a boom or just another bureaucratic shuffle will depend on how fiercely developers compete when the bids roll in.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

 

Brookfield and Google Launch World’s Largest Hydropower Agreement

Google has struck a landmark deal to buy more than $3 billion worth of hydroelectric power from Brookfield Asset Management to supply its data centers, with the potential to scale up the agreement to 3,000 megawatts — making it the largest corporate hydropower deal ever signed.

Under the 20-year contract, Google will source 670 megawatts of electricity from Brookfield’s Holtwood and Safe Harbor plants in Pennsylvania, located roughly 75 miles southwest of Philadelphia. These hydro plants will support Google’s data centers and help advance its commitment to operate entirely on carbon-free energy, matching consumption with clean power every hour.

This deal is the first in a broader framework between the two companies, focused on securing hydroelectric power across two major U.S. grids — from the Upper Midwest to the Gulf Coast and mid-Atlantic. Hydropower, while renewable, also offers dispatchable generation, giving Google a stable alternative to back up variable sources like wind and solar.

The agreement is being announced as part of the Trump administration’s unveiling of $70 billion in AI and energy investments. While the White House promotes U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence, its policy moves — including tariffs and the removal of clean energy tax incentives — have created uncertainties for renewables investment.

The surge in AI computing has driven massive demand for electricity, with hyperscalers such as Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta scrambling to secure power. This demand has sparked renewed interest in nuclear power and triggered a wave of natural gas and turbine development.

Brookfield said the long-term contracts with Google would help support relicensing efforts for its hydro facilities, and that further expansions or acquisitions could follow, depending on Google's future needs.

This isn’t Brookfield’s first major clean energy partnership. Last year, it signed a separate deal with Microsoft to deliver more than 10.5 gigawatts of new wind and solar capacity across the U.S. and Europe between 2026 and 2030.

 

Sheffield’s Fight for Exxon Board Seat Isn’t Over Yet

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has denied a petition from Scott Sheffield, founder and former CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources, seeking to overturn a 2024 order barring him from serving on ExxonMobil’s board following its $64.5 billion acquisition of Pioneer. The FTC rejected the petition on procedural grounds, stating Sheffield was not a party to the original order and thus lacked standing to formally challenge it.

Despite the denial, the FTC indicated it would still review Sheffield’s arguments under an internal rule that allows reconsideration of final decisions. “They have not ruled on the merits of my strong objections,” Sheffield told Hart Energy, “and in fact they have indicated their intention to consider my arguments for reopening and vacating the order.”

The 2024 FTC order, issued under then-Chair Lina Khan, required that Sheffield hold no formal or advisory role at ExxonMobil for five years due to concerns he could coordinate with OPEC to influence oil prices. Sheffield has denied these allegations and filed a separate lawsuit against Khan personally.

At the time, the FTC vote was 3-2 in favor of the restriction. The current FTC, composed entirely of Republican commissioners, voted unanimously to deny Sheffield’s petition but appears more open to reviewing the merits of the case.

The FTC has been soliciting public comments on whether the order should be reopened. After a social media post from Khan encouraged responses, over 100 comments were submitted—mostly opposing any change.

The FTC clarified that while its original complaint referenced Sheffield’s alleged interactions with OPEC, it did not formally charge him with violating antitrust laws.

Sheffield maintains the initial decision was an example of “gross and unjust government overreach.” The FTC has also been reviewing a similar order preventing Hess CEO John Hess from joining Chevron’s board.

 

Geronimo Power Breaks Ground on 250-MW Portage Solar Project in Wisconsin

Geronimo Power, formerly National Grid Renewables, has begun construction on its 250-megawatt (MW) Portage Solar Project in Portage County, Wisconsin, marking a significant step in the state’s renewable energy expansion. The project, part of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) market, follows the recent start of construction on Geronimo’s 100-MW Apple River Solar project in Polk County, reinforcing the company’s commitment to clean energy and economic development in the Badger State.

The Portage Solar Project is expected to deliver substantial economic benefits, with Geronimo projecting more than $73 million in direct economic impact over its first 20 years of operation. This includes $24 million in new tax revenue for Portage County and local townships, alongside job creation and increased local spending. Combined with the Apple River project, Geronimo’s initiatives are anticipated to contribute over $100 million to Wisconsin’s economy. “The true value of renewable energy isn’t in the power it provides to the local grid,” said Joe Ibrahim, Geronimo Power’s vice president of construction. “It’s about the immensely positive impact to local economies in the form of new revenue streams and job creation.”

The project will create more than 300 construction jobs, with Geronimo prioritizing local Wisconsin craft labor to fill these roles. The company has partnered with Burns & McDonnell, an engineering, procurement, and construction firm, for its first collaboration on a solar power project. Leslie M. Duke, chair and CEO of Burns & McDonnell, highlighted the project’s alignment with growing energy demands, particularly from data centers. “As demand for data centers continues to grow, so does the need for reliable, renewable energy,” Duke said. “We are proud to support Geronimo Power in the buildout of the Portage site.”

Beyond economic contributions, Geronimo has pledged $1.25 million to local charities and organizations over the project’s first 20 years through a dedicated charitable fund. This initiative underscores the company’s farmer-founded, community-focused ethos, aiming to foster long-term partnerships in project areas.

The Portage Solar Project comes at a time when renewable energy is gaining traction across the Midwest, driven by falling costs and supportive policies. According to Reuters, U.S. solar capacity is expected to grow significantly through 2025, with projects like Portage helping meet rising electricity demands from data centers and electrification trends. However, challenges remain, as Inside Climate News reported that MISO’s grid faces delays due to interconnection backlogs and costly transmission upgrades, which have stalled some renewable projects in the region.

Geronimo’s efforts align with broader clean energy goals. The company, which has developed over 2,400 MW of wind and solar projects nationwide, is leveraging a power purchase agreement (PPA) to ensure the Portage project’s output supports Wisconsin’s clean energy transition. With the state aiming to reduce carbon emissions, projects like Portage and Apple River are critical to meeting those targets while revitalizing rural economies.

As construction progresses, the Portage Solar Project is poised to deliver clean energy, economic growth, and community support, solidifying Wisconsin’s role in the nation’s renewable energy landscape.

By Michael Kern for Oilprice.com 

 

Informal miners lift blockades along Peru’s key copper route, protest leader says

Protests at Las Bambas. Credit: Ondando, Wikimedia Commons under licence CC BY-SA 4.0.

Informal miners in Peru have paused their more-than-two-week-long protest that blocked a major copper transit route, one of the protest leaders, Luis Huaman, told Reuters on Tuesday.

He said they planned to suspend the protest at least through Friday, while continuing to press the government for more favorable regulations for informal mining.

(By Marco Aquino and Daina Beth Solomon; Editing by Kylie Madry)

 

Ghana moves to hedge gold price to preserve build-up of reserves

Kwame Nkrumah Memorial Park, Accra, Ghana. Stock image.

Ghana is working on a program to hedge the price of gold exports as it seeks to shield earnings that have bolstered the central bank’s foreign reserves from future volatility, Governor of the Bank of Ghana Johnson Asiama said.

Increased production and higher prices have helped Africa’s top gold miner to boost gross international reserves to $11.1 billion, Asiama said in the capital, Accra on Tuesday. The buffer is enough to cover 4.8 months of imports, he said.

“While beneficial for now, a future correction in prices could quickly narrow our trade surplus,” Asiama said.

Ghana’s gold exports increased by 76% from a year earlier to $5.2 billion in the first four months through April. That’s underpinned a widening in the trade surplus to $4.1 billion from $759 million over this period.

The improvement, alongside government commitment to fiscal consolidation, has spurred a more than 40% rally in the cedi against the dollar this year to make it the second-best performer in the world among currencies tracked by Bloomberg, after the Russian ruble.

Gold rose 0.3% to $3,351 an ounce at 1:33 p.m. in London, pushing its gain this year to 27.7%. The cedi traded unchanged at 10.4 per dollar.

Cryptocurrency oversight

Asiama said the country is finalizing a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency dealings to bring exchanges and other digital asset platforms under formal oversight.

“It is a fact that crypto is a big thing in Ghana,” he said. “We can pretend but reality is that it is impacting.”

Regulation will allow the central bank to bring virtual currencies under the oversight of its anti-money laundering and terrorism finance rules, and ensure that digital innovation supports rather than undermines foreign exchange control and monetary stability, he said.

(By Moses Mozart Dzawu)

 

Indigenous groups ask Chile court to pause community review of Codelco-SQM lithium deal




Atacama salt flat. (Image by Nicolas de Camaret, Flickr.)

Two Indigenous groups in northern Chile have asked a local court to suspend a state-led community review process that is required for a lithium partnership between copper giant Codelco and lithium miner SQM, according to legal documents reviewed by Reuters.

The Indigenous community of Coyo and the Atacameno Association of Irrigators and Farmers of San Pedro de Atacama each independently filed legal challenges last week with a Chilean appeals court in the Antofagasta region, accusing Chilean economic development agency Corfo of not properly carrying out a consultation process to seek their input on the partnership.

The process is one of the final conditions for a deal to go into effect in which state-run Codelco will take a majority stake in SQM’s lithium mining operations in the Atacama salt flat.

The Coyo community and the Atacameno Association of Irrigators and Farmers, which has Indigenous members, said they needed more information and time to be able to provide informed consent on the plan.

The Antofagasta court on Friday accepted their challenges, according to a court document. It ordered Corfo to respond to the allegations within 15 days, and asked Codelco and SQM to provide comments.

Corfo told Reuters that the consultation process was still in progress.

“The Indigenous consultation process with the Atacama Indigenous organizations is moving forward and has been carried out in accordance with the regulations,” the agency said in a statement.

Codelco declined to comment, while SQM did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

The Indigenous consultation, which was led by Corfo and included a few dozen community groups located around the Atacama salt flat, was due to conclude around late July.

SQM and Codelco are separately holding talks with communities near the salt flat to discuss a model for Indigenous oversight over lithium extraction.

The Coyo community and Atacameno Association of Irrigators and Farmers both asked the court to suspend the process until a new methodology for the community review could be implemented, and more information provided.

Both groups said Corfo had not provided enough detail about the proposed contract between Codelco and SQM and argued that the consultation’s timeline between November 2024 and July 2025 was too fast to allow for detailed analysis.

They also said Corfo at several points did not act in good faith, and did not meet the standards set out by the International Labour Organization, a UN agency.

“This situation directly affects the fundamental rights of the Community by limiting its influence over decisions that impact its territory, environmental surroundings, and collective rights, thereby violating constitutional guarantees,” the Coyo community said in its court filing.

(By Daina Beth Solomon; Editing by Jamie Freed)

 

Critical Metals soars as it begins drilling to boost Greenland rare earth resource


Drill rig at Tanbreez project. Credit: Critical Metals Corp.

Critical Metals (NASDAQ: CRML) has launched a 2,000-metre drilling program aimed at expanding the resource at its Tanbreez rare earth project in Greenland ahead of a feasibility study. Its shares surged on the update.

In a press release Tuesday, the New York-based critical minerals developer said the drilling represents “an important investment and step” in its efforts to bring a “game-changing rare earth asset” into production as soon as possible.

The Tanbreez project — situated on a 4.7-billion-tonne mineralized kakortokite unit in southern Greenland that has been largely unexplored to date — represents one of the world’s largest rare earth deposits.

The rare earth resource, from an orebody covering 8 km x 5 km in area, is estimated at nearly 45 million tonnes (indicated and inferred), representing just 1% of the entire host rock. Approximately 27% of that resource is categorized as heavy rare earths, which are used in high-performance applications such as clean energy and defense, and are less common than light rare earths.

Based on this resource, Critical Metals released a preliminary economic assessment earlier this year, showing a net present value (NPV) of approximately $3 billion (approximately $2.8 billion to $3.6 billion at discount rates of 15% and 12.5%, respectively, before tax), with an internal rate of return (IRR) of 180%.

The report outlines a phased growth strategy for the Tanbreez project, with initial production of around 85,000 tonnes of rare earth oxides per annum, beginning as early as 2026, then scaled to 425,000 tonnes after modular expansion.

500Mt exploration target

The 2025 drilling campaign will focus solely on the eudialyte component of Tanbreez rare earth mineralization found on the Fjord deposit, which accounts for about half of the resource at 22.6 million tonnes. The remaining resources are contained in feldspar and arfvedsonite.

Specifically, the Critical Metals team is looking to further extend the Fjord deposit to the east approximately 700 metres, and 650 metres along strike of the kakortokite host rock, which by comparison measures 5 km x 2.5 km in area and several hundred metres thick.

In its press release, the company said it considers this as a 500-million-tonne exploration target with the 4.7-billion-tonne host rock.


According to the company, the target depths for the vertical drill holes will range from 80 to 250 metres over the undulating topography. The first hole has already been collared and down to approximately 60 metres in outcropping kakortokite host.

“This new drilling program is designed to significantly increase the size of the current mineral resource estimate (MRE) and support the development of the bankable feasibility study (BFS), paving the way for a final decision to mine,” CEO Tony Sage said in a news release.

The company also expects new drill results from its 2024 campaign to further verify the potential of the Tanbreez project while it completes this year’s drilling.

With full exploration teams now on site, Critical Metals says new data collected will “play a key role” in finalizing the BFS and preparing the comprehensive reports required by Greenland regulators as well as its proposed financial partners. Last month, it received a letter from the US Export-Import Bank (EXIM) for a loan worth up to $120 million to fund the project.

Shares of Critical Metals soared over 22% to a four-month high of $3.80 on the NASDAQ on the announcement of drilling. It pulled back to around $3.60 a share by noon EST, for a market capitalization of $361.8 million.