Friday, September 12, 2025

 

Cheese fungi help unlock secrets of evolution



Color changes in fungi on cheese rinds point to specific molecular mechanisms of genetic adaptation—and sometimes a tastier cheese




Tufts University

Mold on Bayley Hazen Blue cheese adapts to conditions in a cheese cave 

image: 

The mold on the rind of Bayley Hazen Blue cheese: the original green and the evolved white several years later. “This was really exciting because we thought it could be an example of evolution happening right before our eyes,” said Benjamin Wolfe

view more 

Credit: Benjamin Wolfe






Many scientific discoveries are serendipitous—the result of chance. Seeing evolution in action in a cheese cave turned out to be exactly that for Benjamin Wolfe, associate professor of biology, and his colleagues.

Back in 2016, Wolfe convinced his former post-doc advisor to drive with him to Jasper Hill Farm in Vermont to get samples of a special cheese called Bayley Hazen Blue, a ruse for her boyfriend to propose marriage at the spot where they first met. Wolfe ended up keeping that cheese in the freezer in his lab. “I’m notorious for not throwing samples away just in case we might need them,” he says.  

But when graduate student Nicolas Louw picked up recent samples of Bayley Hazen Blue from the Jasper Hill caves—large, damp rooms built into the side of steep hills—he discovered the cheese, previously coated with a leafy green layer of fungus, was now chalk white on the outside.

“This was really exciting because we thought it could be an example of evolution happening right before our eyes,” said Wolfe. “Microbes evolve. We know that from antibiotic resistance evolution, we know that from pathogen evolution, but we don’t usually see it happening at a specific place over time in a natural setting.” Wolfe and his colleagues reported the finding in Current Biology.

Understanding how fungi adapt to different environments can help us in areas of food security and health, too, says Louw. “Somewhere around 20% of staple crops are lost pre-harvest due to fungal rot, and an additional 20% are lost to fungi post-harvest,” he said. “That includes the moldy bread in your pantry and rotting fruit on market shelves. The biggest threat to global food security is just rot from mold.” Understanding how to control this problem while preventing fungal adaptation is an agricultural priority.

A Small but Key Mutation

When wheels of cheese are placed to ripen in natural or artificial cave environments, they form microbial rinds on their surface made up of communities of bacteria, yeast, and filamentous fungi (molds). These wild microbes are picked up from soil, plant, and marine environments and end up colonizing and adapting to the environments of the cheese caves.

What caused the Penicillium solitum fungi on the Jasper Hill cheeses to change color? A student in one of Wolfe’s advanced microbiology laboratory courses on microbiomes found the answer. Jackson Larlee, A24, discovered that the change was prompted by the disruption of a gene called alb1

“Alb1 is involved in producing melanin,” Louw explained. “You can think of melanin as an armor that organisms make to protect themselves from UV damage. For the fungi, it creates the green color that absorbs UV light. If you are growing in a dark cave and can get by without melanin, it makes sense to get rid of it, so you don’t have to expend precious energy to make it. By breaking that pathway and going from green to white, the fungi are essentially saving energy to invest in other things for survival and growth.”

It’s a process called “relaxed selection,” when an environmental stressor is removed, and that happens to many organisms when they adapt to dark conditions, from Mexican cave fish to salamanders to some insects. It’s almost always a loss of pigments and melanin. Some creatures become blind, then increase their ability to sense food in other ways. 

The fungi gave the Wolfe lab an opportunity to identify the genetic mechanisms that led to a small evolutionary change. “We found that the change was not just one mutation that swept through the whole colony, but the color shift came about through many types of mutations independently,” said Louw. 

Some of the fungi had point mutations—single DNA base pair changes—at different locations in the genome. Others had a large insertion of DNA caused by something called a transposable element. Transposable elements, once called “jumping genes,” pop out of one location and insert themselves into another in the genome. 

In this case, transposable elements were inserting themselves ahead of the alb1 gene, which disrupted its expression, effectively knocking it out. Transposable elements can cause a lot of damage, but this time, it was an advantage for the fungi to forego production of melanin—allowing it more energy to grow. Thus, the white wheels of cheese in the Jasper Hill cave.

Aspergillus fungi are in the same family as Penicillium. They are found in the soil, on decaying plants, in household dust and ventilation systems and in massive quantities in the air. Most of the time they are harmless, but some strains can cause severe lung infections. Understanding how they become locally adapted and lodged in the lung environment could help researchers understand and prevent these infections. 

For now, the Wolfe lab, in collaboration with Jasper Hill Farm, is exploring another benefit of evolving and domesticating fungi—creating new types of cheese with improved aesthetics, taste, and texture. They inoculated fresh brie cheese with the novel white mold and let it grow and ripen the cheese for two months. 

The result: “It’s slightly nuttier and less funky,” said Louw. “I think it’s delicious.” Based on a taste testing panel, the new cheese has promising attributes that will be further fine-tuned in future batches of cheese at Jasper Hill Farm. 

“Seeing wild molds evolve right before our eyes over a period of a few years helps us think that that we can develop a robust domestication process, to create new genetic diversity and tap into that for cheesemaking,” said Wolfe.

Nicolas Louw sampling Bayley Hazen Blue cheese from a cheese cave in Vermont's Jasper Hill Farm

Credit

Benjamin Wolfe

 

Mental health effects of exposure to firearm violence persist long after direct exposure



The first global comprehensive review identifies three fundamental mechanisms of psychological distress associated with firearm use and accessibility


Wolters Kluwer Health



September 12, 2025 — Interventions to address firearm accessibility and related dangers should account not only for direct exposure to violence but also for complex psychosocial pathways through which firearms affect mental health across populations, according to a systematic scoping review published in the September/October issue of Harvard Review of Psychiatry, part of the Lippincott portfolio from Wolters Kluwer.

Rodolfo Furlan Damiano, MD, PhD, of the Institute of Psychiatry at the University of São Paulo in Brazil, and colleagues are the first to comprehensively examine data on the mental health effects of firearm ownership, violence, and policies. They conclude, "A whole-government approach that prioritizes mental health screenings, firearm safety, evidence-based policies, and socioeconomic equity could significantly reduce the prevalence of firearm-related psychological harm."

Global review included research from criminology, public health, and sociology

The researchers conducted a systematic literature search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycInfo, from inception to March 1, 2023. Any study related to firearms that had mental health outcomes was eligible for consideration. There were no language or geographic limitations.

In a scoping review, the researchers then explored relationships among firearm access, aggressive behavior, substance abuse, and societal violence, and their influences on mental health. The hierarchical screening protocol prioritized studies with direct mental health outcomes and included those with established mental health implications from adjacent fields (criminology, public health, sociology). Ultimately, data were extracted from 467 studies.

The vast majority of studies (81%) were conducted in the US, 6% in Western Europe, 4% in Australia, and 3% in Canada, with a few other countries contributing one or two studies. Suicide was by far the most studied outcome (61% of studies), followed by firearm access, firearm violence (7.3%), and depression/fear (each 2.4%). The analysis demonstrated considerable research gaps on mental health consequences, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, sleep disturbances, intimate partner violence, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders.


Firearms affect mental health across ecological levels

The scoping review revealed three fundamental psychological mechanisms through which firearms affect mental health:

  • Firearms enable impulsive action during psychological distress. Evidence showed they increase suicide risk three- to five-fold, regardless of prior mental health status.
  • Firearms are "psychological amplifiers" that magnify aggression, simultaneously increase (rather than alleviate) fear and anxiety, and exacerbate trauma symptoms among those exposed to gun violence. "This cycle creates feedback loops whereby firearms worsen the very distress they're intended to relieve," the researchers note.
  • Firearms serve as potent symbols that transform power dynamics and perceptions of vulnerability. This phenomenon was particularly notable in the context of intimate partner violence, where firearms were found to increase controlling behaviors via documented associations with hypermasculinity.

"These interconnected mechanisms account for some of why firearms—which are deeply ingrained in society and perceived as symbols of power and freedom—have such significant consequences for mental health outcomes," the authors explain.

Cultural reliance on firearms extends beyond physical danger, they emphasize. The complex psychosocial pathways that heighten risk of impulsive action simultaneously generate population-level psychological effects, which explain why multilevel interventions are necessary.

Read Article: The Impact of Firearm Ownership, Violence, and Policies on Mental Health: A Systematic Scoping Review

Wolters Kluwer provides trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that engage clinicians, patients, researchers, and students in effective decision-making and outcomes across health care. We support clinical effectiveness, learning and research, clinical surveillance and compliance, as well as data solutions. For more information about our solutions, visit https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/health.

###

About Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in information, software solutions and services for professionals in health care; tax and accounting; financial and corporate compliance; legal and regulatory; corporate performance and ESG. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with technology and services.

Wolters Kluwer reported 2024 annual revenues of €5.9 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 21,400 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.

For more information, visit www.wolterskluwer.com, follow us on LinkedInFacebookYouTube, and Instagram.

 

Most Americans favor MMR vaccine requirement for public school, Annenberg survey finds





Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Attitudes Toward MMR Vaccination School Requirements 

image: 

Annenberg Science and Public Health (ASAPH) Surveys, Apr. 2025, Aug. 2023, Jun. 2023, & Jan. 2023.

view more 

Credit: Annenberg Public Policy Center






PHILADELPHIA – Although Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. posted on social media in April that the “most effective way to prevent the spread of measles is the MMR vaccine,” in a CBS News interview that month he said, “The federal government’s position, my position, is that people should get the measles vaccine, but the government should not be mandating it.”

The Trump administration’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission report issued Sept. 9, “Make Our Children Healthy Again” urges a rethinking of childhood vaccine schedules and mandates, based on what it calls a desire to inform parents “fully on the risks and benefits of vaccines.” The report says: “Many of them have concerns about the appropriate use of vaccines and their possible role in the growing childhood chronic disease crisis.”

Research by the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) in April 2025 finds that 70% of the public supports vaccine requirements for MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) for children to attend public school, more than in 2023.

APPC’s Annenberg Science and Public Health survey, conducted in April among a nationally representative panel of 1,653 U.S. adults, finds that when asked to choose between parental choice or a requirement that healthy children get the MMR vaccine in order to attend public school “because of the potential risk for other children and adults when children are not vaccinated,” 70% support the vaccine requirement. Less than one in five people (18%) say their view is closer to the statement that “parents should be able to decide whether or not to vaccinate their children who attend public schools even if their decision not to vaccinate creates health risks for other children.”

This 70% support for the MMR vaccine requirement in April 2025 increased significantly since August 2023, when 63% said requiring the MMR vaccine for school was closer to their view on childhood vaccines for MMR.

A different Annenberg survey this year, in January 2025, took a more comprehensive look at vaccination requirements and support for opt-outs. It found that over 7 in 10 U.S. adults support a policy making it mandatory for parents to vaccinate their children against preventable diseases such as measles, mumps, and rubella.

APPC’s Annenberg Science and Public Health survey

The survey data come from the 24th wave of a nationally representative panel of 1,653 U.S. adults conducted for the Annenberg Public Policy Center by SSRS, an independent market research company. Most have been empaneled since April 2021. To account for attrition, replenishment samples have been added over time using a random probability sampling design. The most recent replenishment, in September 2024, added 360 respondents to the sample. This wave of the Annenberg Science and Public Health (ASAPH) survey was fielded April 15-28, 2025. The margin of sampling error (MOE) is ± 3.4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All figures are rounded to the nearest whole number and may not add to 100%. Combined subcategories may not add to totals in the topline and text due to rounding.

Download the topline and the methods report.

The policy center has been tracking the American public’s knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors regarding vaccination, Covid-19, flu, RSV, and other consequential health issues through this survey panel for four years. APPC’s team on the ASAPH survey includes research analyst Laura A. Gibson; Patrick E. Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Health and Risk Communication Institute; Ken Winneg, managing director of survey research; and APPC director Kathleen Hall Jamieson.

See other recent Annenberg health survey news releases:

The Annenberg Public Policy Center was established in 1993 to educate the public and policy makers about communication’s role in advancing public understanding of political, science, and health issues at the local, state, and federal levels. Connect with us on FacebookXInstagram, and Bluesky.

 

Ancient DNA reveals deeply complex Mastodon family and repeated migrations driven by climate change




McMaster University
A new study reveals how complex Mastodon evolution 

image: 

Study co-author Emil Karpinski examining ancient bone in McMaster’s Ancient DNA lab.

view more 

Credit: McMaster University





An ancient DNA analysis of the remains of several mastodons, including those which roamed along the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of North America, has revealed the Ice Age giants migrated vast distances in response to shifting climates and were far more genetically diverse than previously known.

In the study published today in the journal Science Advances, researchers from McMaster University and Harvard provide new evidence which significantly revises and reshapes our understanding of the species’ deeply complex evolutionary history.

Well-preserved fossilized specimens of teeth, tusks and bone—dating back hundreds of thousands of years—coupled with new scientific techniques, have allowed researchers to reconstruct genomes from ancient, tiny, degraded DNA fragments.

They reconstructed the mitochondrial genomes from several mastodon specimens: five from Nova Scotia and the eastern seaboard, one of which may date to approximately 500,000 years ago, and for the first time, a unique specimen of a Pacific mastodon from Tualatin, Oregon, in addition to a partial mitochondrial genome from Northern Ontario.

Mastodons were initially split into numerous separate species but later consolidated back into a single one - Mammut americanum. More recently, this classification has been revised to potentially include at least two distinct species: the American and the Pacific mastodon (M. pacificus), although a debate over the split has persisted.

The genetic analyses confirm the Pacific mastodons belong to a very old, well-established and separate genetic branch, with a range that extended much farther than previously believed—reaching deep into the Pacific Northwest, possibly south to Mexico, and as far north as Alberta.

Interestingly, Alberta appears to have been a ‘hot spot’, say scientists, where Pacific and American mastodons congregated, expanded northward and may have interbred.

The East Coast and Northern Ontario specimens revealed two new and distinct genetic groups, known as clades, of mastodons living in the same region but at different times. The eastern species were surprisingly diverse, arriving in distinct waves of migration at least three times —a pattern driven by repeated cycles of climate warming, leading to glacial melting and the opening of new territory for northward expansion. When climate cooled and glaciers expanded, mastodons were driven south or went locally extinct.

“The data shifts our view of the region today known as Alberta and the north more generally, from a marginal roaming ground to a repeatedly occupied migratory corridor and significant landscape for mastodons with possible interbreeding,” says senior author and evolutionary geneticist Hendrik Poinar, director of the McMaster Ancient DNA Centre and the Michael G. DeGroote Chair in Genetic Anthropology.

Researchers also pinpointed a mysterious and genetically distinct Mexican mastodon lineage, which they believe could be a deeper branch of the western species M. pacificus or possibly an entirely new, third mastodon species.

The mastodon was among the largest living land animals on Earth during the Ice Age, roaming from Beringia (present-day Alaska and the Yukon) east to Nova Scotia and south to Central Mexico. They were primarily browsers, living in swampy settings, eating shrubs and low-hanging tree branches, and occupied a very different habitant from their distant cousins, the Ice Age iconic woolly mammoths which roamed on open grasslands and tundra.

“This study represents several firsts which includes our work on the Pacific mastodon. It also poses many new questions. For example, how did these distant species of mastodon interact in Alberta? Did they compete for resources, or did they interbreed as our lab has previously shown for mammoths?” says lead author Emil Karpinski, a former graduate student at the McMaster Ancient DNA Centre, now a research fellow in the Department of Genetics at the Harvard Medical School.  

These new findings, combined with those reported in a 2020 study conducted by the same team, create a much more complete picture of how mastodons moved and diversified across North America, helping conservationists today prepare for an ever warming artic and northern migrating species, say researchers.

The paper's co-authors also included Sina Baleka, a postdoctoral researcher at the McMaster Ancient DNA Centre; Andrew Boehm, senior archaeologist at the University of Oregon's Museum of Natural and Cultural History; Tim Fedak, curator of geology at the Nova Scotia Museum of National History; and Chris Widga, director of Earth and Mineral Sciences Museum & Art Gallery at Penn State University. 

Attention editors: Photos related to the research can be downloaded at: https://photos.app.goo.gl/GTGNk8w763zPHgyq6

A sample of a mastodon femur 

Middle River Mastodon femur, estimated to be 91,000 years old, found in a gypsum sinkhole in Nova Scotia.

Windsor Sinkhole Mastodon tusk, dated to approximately 178,000 years ago, was found in a gypsum sinkhole in Nova Scotia.

Little Narrows Mastodon tibia, estimated to be 358,000 years old, is likely the oldest mastodon with available genetic data.

Credit

Nova Scotia Museem