Tuesday, September 30, 2025

 

Study shows HPV vaccine protects vaccinated — and unvaccinated — women




Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Jessica Kahn, M.D., M.P.H. 

image: 

Jessica Kahn, M.D., M.P.H., professor of pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

view more 

Credit: Albert Einstein College of Medicine






September 29, 2025 (BRONX, NY)—A large, long-term study led by an Albert Einstein College of Medicine researcher has found that the introduction of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in community settings is highly effective in protecting young women from infections caused by the cervical-cancer-causing virus—including women who didn’t even receive the vaccine. The study was published today in JAMA Pediatrics.

“There are two encouraging takeaways from our study,” said lead author Jessica Kahn, M.D., M.P.H., professor of pediatrics and the Dr. Ernest Baden Chair in Head and Neck Pathology at Einstein. “First, HPV vaccines work remarkably well in a real-world setting, even among women at high risk for HPV and who may not have received all vaccine doses. Second, we saw clear evidence of herd immunity, meaning when enough people are vaccinated, the vaccine indirectly protects unvaccinated people by reducing overall virus transmission. These results reinforce the potential of the HPV vaccine to prevent infection and, ultimately, eliminate cervical cancer globally.”

HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and is the primary cause of cervical cancer. HPV also causes other genital cancers as well as head and neck cancers in both women and men. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, HPV is responsible for more than 690,000 new cancer cases each year—about 4.5% of all cancers globally.

Testing a Vaccine’s Real-World Performance
While randomized clinical trials have shown that HPV vaccines confer strong protection from infection, “participants in those studies tended to be healthier and at lower risk for HPV than the general population, so they weren’t necessarily representative of the broader community,” said Dr. Kahn, who also serves as senior associate dean for clinical and translational research and director of the  Harold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research at Einstein and Montefiore. “That’s why we needed to evaluate how the vaccine works in real-world settings that included young women who were at relatively high risk for HPV and had different levels of vaccine uptake.”

The research team conducted six studies in Cincinnati of 2,335 adolescent and young adult women between 2006—just before the first HPV vaccine became available—and 2023. Participants ranged in age from 13 to 26 at enrollment. Many reported sexual behaviors that increased risk for HPV (79% had two or more male sexual partners) and 51% had a history of at least one sexually transmitted infection.

Participants were considered vaccinated if they had received at least one dose of any of the available HPV vaccines:

  • the 2-valent vaccine, which protects against HPV types 16 and 18 (responsible for over 70% of cervical cancers);
  • the 4-valent vaccine, which protects against HPV types 16 and 18 and adds protection against types 6 and 11 (which cause about 90% of genital warts);
  • and the current 9-valent vaccine, introduced in 2014, which in addition to HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18, protects against five additional cancer-related HPV types (31, 33, 45, 52, and 58); the types targeted by this vaccine cause about 90% of cervical cancers.

Over the 17-year study period, HPV vaccination rates rose from 0% to 82%. As vaccination coverage increased, the rates of HPV infection dropped dramatically among vaccinated participants:

  • Infections from HPV types covered by the 2-valent vaccine fell by 98.4%
  • Infections from types covered by the 4-valent vaccine dropped by 94.2%
  • Infections from types covered by the 9-valent vaccine declined by 75.7%

“These outcomes show that HPV vaccines are highly effective outside of controlled trials and could dramatically reduce rates of cervical cancer and other HPV-caused cancers, including other genital cancers and head and neck cancers,” said Dr. Kahn.

“Our analysis of the data indicates that those reductions in infection rates were primarily due to the vaccine’s introduction and not because of changes in sexual behavior or other factors,” said Aislinn DeSieghardt, M.S., the paper’s first author and clinical research coordinator at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. “I also want to thank the all the young women who participated in the study, who have meaningfully contributed to this research that has the potential to save more lives.”

A Vaccine’s Benefits Extend to Unvaccinated Women
The researchers also found strong evidence of herd immunity. Among unvaccinated women:

  • Infections with HPV types covered by the 2-valent vaccine decreased by 71.6%
  • Infections with HPV types covered by the 4-valent vaccine dropped by 75.8%

Dr. Kahn noted that the high degree of herd immunity was likely related to robust vaccination rates and vaccination of boys as well as girls. While there wasn’t enough data yet to confirm herd protection from the more recently introduced 9-valent vaccine, the results are promising.

“In the U.S. and other countries with widespread HPV vaccination programs, cervical cancer rates are already declining,” Dr. Kahn said. “Yet in 42 countries, it remains the leading cause of cancer death among women. Globally, only 27% of girls have received at least one dose of this lifesaving vaccine – with coverage ranging from just 1% in the Eastern Mediterranean region to 68% in the Americas. By expanding uptake of this highly safe and effective vaccine, and ensuring access to screening and treatment, we can achieve one of the greatest public health victories of our time: the elimination of cervical cancer worldwide.”

The study is titled “Population-Level Effectiveness and Herd Protection 17 Years After Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Introduction.” Additional authors include Aislinn DeSieghardt and Lili Ding both at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, Aaron Ermel and Darron Brown, both at Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, Eduardo L. Franco at McGill University, Montreal, Canada, Casey Dagnall at Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD and National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, and Sem Yao at Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH.

***

About Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Albert Einstein College of Medicine is one of the nation’s premier centers for research, medical education and clinical investigation. During the 2024-25 academic year, Einstein is home to 712 M.D. students, 226 Ph.D. students, 112 students in the combined M.D./Ph.D. program, and approximately 250 postdoctoral research fellows. The College of Medicine has more than 2,000 full-time faculty members located on the main campus and at its clinical affiliates. In 2024, Einstein received more than $192 million in awards from the National Institutes of Health. This includes the funding of major research centers at Einstein in cancer, aging, intellectual development disorders, diabetes, clinical and translational research, liver disease, and AIDS. Other areas where the College of Medicine is concentrating its efforts include developmental brain research, neuroscience, cardiac disease, and initiatives to reduce and eliminate ethnic and racial health disparities. Its partnership with Montefiore, the University Hospital and academic medical center for Einstein, advances clinical and translational research to accelerate the pace at which new discoveries become the treatments and therapies that benefit patients. For more information, please visit einsteinmed.edu, follow us on TwitterFacebook, InstagramLinkedIn, and view us on YouTube

 

Researchers at Case Western Reserve University uncover HIV mystery that could unlock the path to a cure




Case Western Reserve University





CLEVELAND—For over three decades, HIV has played an elaborate game of hide-and-seek with researchers, making treating—and possibly even curing—the disease a seemingly insurmountable obstacle to achieve.

But scientists at Case Western Reserve University have made a breakthrough discovery that could fundamentally change strategies for treating HIV.

The team identified for the first time how HIV enters a dormant state in infected cells that allows the virus to “hide” from the immune system and current treatments.

The researchers believe the finding, just published in Nature Microbiology, challenges decades of scientific assumptions and opens a new approach to possibly eliminating the deadly virus.

“This discovery rewrites what we thought we knew about how HIV goes into this stealth mode in the human body,” said study lead Saba Valadkhan, an associate professor in the Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology at the Case Western Reserve School of Medicine. “We’ve shown that HIV actually orchestrates its own survival by reprogramming host cells to create the perfect hiding place.”

The team discovered that HIV uses a clever survival trick that explains why it’s been impossible to cure. After HIV invades a cell, it sneaks its genetic code into the cell’s DNA, then tricks the cell into going to sleep, which also puts the virus to sleep, making both completely invisible. This tactic makes the infected cell invisible to the immune system and unreachable by even today’s most advanced HIV drugs. The virus stays hidden in these dormant cells until the right moment to “wake up” and spread again, creating an undetectable reservoir that ensures HIV never goes away completely.

“What we’ve uncovered is that HIV doesn’t just randomly go dormant—it actively manipulates the host cell to create conditions for its own survival,” said study collaborator Jonathan Karn, Distinguished University Professor and chair of the Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology. “This gives us specific targets to attack.”

The findings may extend far beyond HIV treatment. The researchers believe similar dormancy actions could be triggered by other viruses—including herpes, hepatitis and other retroviruses—potentially leading to new therapies for many viral diseases.

“We may have uncovered new tactic viruses use to trick the host cells to do their bidding,” Valadkhan said.

This discovery is also important for protecting public health worldwide because viruses like HIV—which can permanently insert themselves into a person’s DNA—could potentially be used as future viral threats and pandemic preparedness.

Established HIV research environment

The groundwork for such a discovery was supported by Case Western Reserve’s long-standing interdisciplinary collaboration and robust HIV research infrastructure. The School of Medicine houses a National Institutes of Health-designated Center for AIDS Research founded more than 30 years ago, and the Center for Excellence on the Impact of Substance Use on HIV, providing access to cutting-edge technologies essential for high-impact HIV research.

The research team is now confirming their findings and developing new treatments based on this discovery.                                                   

###

About Case Western Reserve University

As one of the fastest-growing research universities in the United States, Case Western Reserve University is a force in career-defining education and life-changing research. Across our campus, more than 12,000 students from around the world converge to seek knowledge, find solutions and accelerate their impact. They learn from and collaborate with faculty members renowned for expertise in medicine, engineering, science, law, management, dental medicine, nursing, social work, and the arts. And with our location in Cleveland, Ohio—a hub of cultural, business and healthcare activity—our students gain unparalleled access to academic, research, clinical and entrepreneurial opportunities that prepare them to join our network of more than 125,000 alumni worldwide. Visit case.edu to see why Case Western Reserve University is built for those driven to be a force in the world.

 

How EU’s data protection regulation affected news and media websites


General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

EU websites made changes after GDPR but continued to produce quality content, engage users




Carnegie Mellon University




In May 2018, the European Union (EU) implemented the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a major component of EU privacy law. Privacy regulations like the GDPR have long been criticized by the online advertising industry as harmful to the digital economy. Critics argue that stricter privacy laws reduce online tracking, disrupt targeted advertising, and, as a result, weaken the ability of publishers and content creators to generate revenue and maintain free, high-quality content for users. But since its implementation, little attention has been directed to understanding the regulation’s possible effect on interactions between online news and media websites and their visitors.

In a new longitudinal study, researchers examined EU and U.S. news and media websites to determine how online content providers adapted their responses to the GDPR over time, and whether restrictions on online tracking affected outcomes such as the quantity of content and visitors’ engagement. The study found that while EU websites made changes and adapted, they continued to produce quality content and engage audiences at levels comparable to their U.S. counterparts.

The study, by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, MIT, Institut Mines Telecom Business School, and Cornell University, is published in Management Science.

“Content providers rely on online advertising for revenue,” notes Vincent Lefrere at Institut Mines Telecom, who coauthored the study. “The GDPR raised concerns that these providers could be harmed by the regulation of data flows used in programmatic ads and restrictions on online tracking. This, in turn, has led to questions about the appropriate balance between the regulatory goal of protecting privacy and other societal interests.”

In their study, researchers investigated how the GDPR affected ad-supported news and media websites and their consumers by capturing websites’ responses to the regulation and the effects of the regulation on numerous content metrics. They compared the responses and content metrics of EU websites (more directly affected by the GDPR) to those of U.S. websites (less directly affected). The study examined nearly 1,000 content providers in several EU countries (France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom) and in the United States, mining information from their websites at regular intervals between April 2017 and November 2019, before and after the GDPR was implemented.

The study found significant evidence of changes, especially among EU websites, but also differences in responses between EU and U.S. websites. Both EU and U.S. websites responded to the GDPR by significantly reducing the magnitude of visitor tracking—though this reduction was short-lived and followed by an increase in tracking. However, EU websites’ tracking of both EU and U.S. visitors decreased relative to U.S. websites’ tracking of U.S. visitors, and EU websites’ tracking eventually stabilized at levels lower than before the GDPR was implemented. In addition, EU websites increasingly used consent mechanisms, while few U.S. websites did so.

These patterns, along with the observation that most visitors to EU websites originated from the EU while most visitors to U.S. websites came from the United States, confirm that from a regulatory standpoint, the GDPR affected EU and U.S. websites in very different ways.

Using multiple identification strategies and dependent variables, the study did not find any statistically significant impact of the GDPR on EU websites’ ability to provide content relative to their U.S, counterparts, a finding the authors characterize as surprising. While they found a small decline in the average number of page views per user in EU websites relative to U.S. websites, they found no statistically significant impact on other measures of visitor engagement, including the amount of traffic EU websites received or their rank, or visitors’ social media reactions to new content.

These findings suggest that EU websites responded to the GDPR, but over time found ways to do so without affecting their ability to produce content. Thus, “a negative impact of the GDPR on metrics of interest to consumers should not have been assumed; instead, businesses’ responses may have evolved and adapted in ways that minimized potential negative effects,” says Cristobal Cheyre at Cornell University, one of the authors of the study.

Among the limitations of the study, the authors note that it does not analyze potential long-term effects of the regulation. Also, the study does not focus on the role of variable degrees of privacy protection in determining the quality of visitors’ experiences with EU and U.S. websites.

“Although industry predicted dire consequences from the GDPR for content providers, the results of our study suggest that EU content providers responded to the regulation without triggering the undesirable outcomes forecast by the ad-tech industry,” says Alessandro Acquisti at MIT Sloan, who worked on the study while at Carnegie Mellon University. “Our findings can inform the ongoing debate over regulating privacy and firms’ data practices.”

The study was funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, CARNOT Telecom & Societe Numerique, DATAIA Convergence Institute (as part of the Programme d’Investissement d’Avenir), the French National Research Agency, and the National Science Foundation.