Wednesday, October 01, 2025

 

Invasive mosquito vector species detected in surveillance traps in United Kingdom



Climate change may increase the suitability of habitat for invasive mosquito species




PLOS

Invasive mosquito vector species detected in surveillance traps in United Kingdom 

image: 

Mosquito sampling

view more 

Credit: Colin Johnston, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)




Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes are vectors of multiple diseases including dengue, chikungunya and Zika, posing a public health risk to populations within their native range. A study published in PLOS Global Public Health by Colin Johnston at Centre for Climate and Health Security, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom and colleagues describes the detection of invasive mosquito eggs in the United Kingdom in 2023 and 2024, suggesting an increasing incidence of importation of these species.

Historically, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus were limited to subtropical and tropical regions; however, Ae. albopictus has now established populations across parts of southern and central Europe, demonstrating its ability to survive in temperate climates. Rising temperatures and milder winters may increase northward incursions of invasive species, putting new populations at risk of disease transmission. In order to monitor and limit the presence of invasive mosquito species, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) worked with partners to conduct surveillance activities from 2020-2025. Surveillance teams set ovitraps at seaports, airports, and transport hubs on highways in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The traps were monitored every two weeks from June to October every year of the surveillance efforts and the mosquito species were identified using morphological and molecular techniques, working with Edge Hill University. 

Through surveillance efforts, Ae. aegypti eggs were detected in a freight storage facility near London Heathrow Airport in September 2023. In August 2024, Ae. albopictus was detected for the first time since 2019 in Kent, England at a motorway service station.

According to the authors, “While there is currently no evidence that Ae. albopictus or Ae. aegypti are widely established in the UK, without timely action, the UK faces the risk of invasive mosquito populations becoming established. As we have demonstrated here, proactive measures enhance resilience against emerging vector borne disease risks”.

 

The authors add: “The UK Health Security Agency’s surveillance has detected isolated incursions of invasive mosquito species, including Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, also known as the tiger mosquito. While these mosquitoes are not currently established in the UK, their detection highlights the importance of ongoing, enhanced surveillance to reduce the risk of mosquito-borne diseases. UKHSA continues to work with local authorities, landowners and partners to ensure a swift and coordinated response.

Both Aedes aegypti and the tiger mosquito are globally important vectors of diseases such as dengue and chikungunya. The UKHSA’s MEZE group, alongside adult mosquito surveillance and citizen science projects, enhances our ability to detect and respond to new introductions. Although recent findings suggest a low current risk to public health, repeated detections underscore the need for continued vigilance, robust monitoring networks, and early intervention to prevent these invasive species from becoming established in the UK.”

Lead author Colin Johnston, Senior Medical Entomologist, UKHSA, adds: “What stood out during this surveillance was how dynamic and responsive our work needs to be. Each detection triggered enhanced local surveillance and control measures, and the fact that no further specimens were found suggests these were isolated incursions. Working with the wide variety of organisations and individuals was very rewarding. The collaborative efforts between UKHSA, local authorities and landowners were key to rapidly mobilising and preventing the establishment of invasive mosquitoes.”

  

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Global Public Healthhttps://plos.io/4nMrmYN

Citation: Johnston CJ, Edwards AC, Vaux AGC, Abbott AJ, Hardy H, Wilson R, et al. (2025) Invasive mosquito surveillance in the United Kingdom 2020 to 2024: First detection of Aedes aegypti eggs in the UK and further detection of Aedes albopictus. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(10): e0004968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004968

Author Countries: United Kingdom

Funding: Culex project (EW, R.W, M.S.C.B, M.B, A.C, A.G.C.V, J.M.M, C.J, A.A.) was supported by the United Kingdom Research Innovation/ Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs: Culex distribution, vector competence and threat of transmission of arboviruses to humans and animals in the UK (BB/X018172/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Vector-Borne RADAR (A.J.F, A.J.A, M.B.G, A.V, J.M) was supported by the United Kingdom Research Innovation/ Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X017990/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

People with self-diagnosed ADHD report more negative self-image and more internalized stigma than clinically diagnosed individuals, and are more likely to seek social validation, per analysis of 450,000 ADHD sub-reddit posts



PLOS
Seeking validation in the digital age: The impact of validation seeking on self-image and internalized stigma among self- vs. clinically diagnosed individuals on r/ADHD 

image: 

People with self-diagnosed ADHD report more negative self-image and more internalized stigma than clinically diagnosed individuals.

view more 

Credit: Hiki App, Unsplash, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)




People with self-diagnosed ADHD report more negative self-image and more internalized stigma than clinically diagnosed individuals, and are more likely to seek social validation, per analysis of 450,000 ADHD sub-reddit posts

Article URLhttp://plos.io/4plEDJz

Article title: Seeking validation in the digital age: The impact of validation seeking on self-image and internalized stigma among self- vs. clinically diagnosed individuals on r/ADHD

Author countries: U.S., China

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

 

Education appears to have a long-lasting protective effect in cognitive aging, even at 90+ years, according to a small, long-term cohort study




PLOS
Midlife and old-age cardiovascular risk factors, educational attainment, and cognition at 90-years – population-based study with 48-years of follow-up 

image: 

Education appears to have a long-lasting protective effect in cognitive aging, even at 90+ years.

view more 

Credit: Brett Jordan, Unsplash, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)





Education appears to have a long-lasting protective effect in cognitive aging, even at 90+ years, according to a small, long-term cohort study

Article URLhttp://plos.io/4nrerv4

Article title: Midlife and old-age cardiovascular risk factors, educational attainment, and cognition at 90-years – population-based study with 48-years of follow-up

Author countries: Finland

Funding: This work was supported by the Finnish Brain Foundation [to A.V]; Orion Research Foundation [to P.I.M]; The Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation [to P.I.M]; Juho Vainio Foundation [to S.A]; Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics [grant number 352792 to J.K]; NONAGINTA data collection was funded by the Research Council of Finland [grant numbers 320109, 345988 to E.V]; the Research Council of Finland [grant number 314639 to E.V], and the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation Senior Fellowship [to E.V]. The funders played no role in the design, execution, analysis, or interpretation of data, or writing of the study.

 

Why women live longer than men



Study traces the evolutionary roots of the lifespan gap between women and men




Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

Male and female olive baboon 

image: 

Male and female olive baboon (Papio anubis) in Bwindi Impenetrable Forest.

view more 

Credit: © Martha Robbins




To the point

  • Mammals vs birds: Among the 1,176 species studied, female mammals live on average 13 percent longer than males, while among birds, males live about five percent longer than females.
  • Mating strategies play a role: In species with strong competition for mates – as is the case with most mammals – males die earlier. In monogamous species, such as many birds, males often live longer.
  • Findings from zoos: Sex differences are more pronounced in wild populations than in zoos. This suggests that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the discrepancy in life expectancy.

Around the world, women on average live longer than men. This striking pattern holds true across nearly all countries and historical time periods. Although the gap between the sexes has narrowed in some countries due to medical advances and improved living conditions, new research now provides clues as to why this difference is unlikely to disappear anytime soon: the causes are deeply rooted in evolutionary history and can be observed in many animal species.

An international team led by scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, together with 15 co-authors worldwide, conducted the most comprehensive analysis of sex differences in lifespan across mammals and birds to date. Their findings provide novel insight into one of biology’s long-standing puzzles: why males and females age differently.

Longevity: A question of chromosomes?

Across mammals, females usually live longer—for instance, in baboons and gorillas females often outlive males. Yet this pattern is not universal: in many birds, insects, and reptiles, males are the longer-lived sex. One genetic explanation, the heterogametic sex hypothesis, points to differences in sex chromosomes. In mammals, females have two X chromosomes, while males have only one X and one Y (making them the heterogametic sex). Some research suggests that having two X chromosomes may protect females from harmful mutations, offering a survival advantage. In birds, however, the system is reversed: females are the heterogametic sex.

Using records from over 1,176 bird and mammal species in zoos worldwide, the researchers found a striking contrast in lifespan, supporting the heterogametic sex hypothesis: in most mammals (72 percent), females lived longer, by on average twelve percent, while in most bird species (68 percent), males lived longer, overall by an average of five percent. Still, there was remarkable variation with many exceptions. “Some species showed the opposite of the expected pattern,” says lead author Johanna Stärk. “For example, in many birds of prey, females are both larger and longer-lived than males. So sex chromosomes can only be part of the story.”

Sexual selection and parental care shape lifespan differences

In addition to genetics, reproductive strategies also play a role. Through sexual selection, males in particular develop conspicuous characteristics such as colorful plumage, weapons, or large body size, which increase reproductive success but can shorten lifespan. The new study supports this assumption: In polygamous mammals with strong competition, males generally die earlier than females. Many birds, on the other hand, are monogamous, which means that competitive pressure is lower and males often live longer. Overall, the differences were smallest in monogamous species, while polygamy and pronounced size differences were associated with a more pronounced advantage for females.

Parental care also plays a role. The researchers found evidence that the sex that invests more in raising offspring—in mammals, this is often the females—tends to live longer. In long-lived species such as primates, this is likely to be a selective advantage: females survive until their offspring are independent or sexually mature.

Zoo life reduces—but does not erase—lifespan gaps

A long-standing idea is that environmental pressures—such as predation, pathogens, or harsh climates—drive the observed gaps between males and females. To test this, the researchers turned to zoo populations, where such pressures are largely absent. They found that lifespan gaps persisted even under these protected conditions. Comparing zoo and wild populations showed that the gaps were often smaller in zoos but rarely disappeared—mirroring the human case, where advances in medicine and living conditions have narrowed but not eliminated the lifespan gap.

The findings suggest that sex differences in lifespan are deeply rooted in evolutionary processes—shaped by sexual selection and parental investment and that genetic differences in the sex determination system may also play a role. Environmental factors influence the extent of the differences, but cannot eliminate them. The differences between the sexes are therefore not only a product of the environment, but part of our evolutionary history – and will most likely continue to exist in the future.

Ambia and Malumbi - Western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in Loango National Park.

Credit

© Martha Robbins