Wednesday, October 01, 2025

 

CATNIP for chemists: New data-driven tool broadens access to greener chemistry




University of Michigan






University of Michigan and Carnegie Mellon University researchers have developed a new tool that makes greener chemistry more accessible. 

 

The tool, described in a study supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation and scheduled to publish Oct. 1 in the journal Nature, removes a major barrier to wider adoption of biocatalysis.

 

Biocatalysts, also called enzymes, are a type of protein that have evolved to perform chemistry that can be complex and incredibly efficient—typically in water and at room temperature—removing the need for toxic or expensive chemical reagents to run reactions. But they are also highly selective, meaning that they are specialized to work with the specific starting compounds, or substrates, they interact with in their natural environment.

 

To capitalize on the power of biocatalysts in the lab, though, chemists need to know what other substrates a protein can work with and, more precisely, which enzymes will work with their desired substrate.

 

"Biocatalysis offers a more sustainable way to build molecules, and it can also give us access to molecules that we couldn't build using traditional chemical methods," said Alison Narayan, professor of chemistry in the U-M College of Literature, Sciences, and the Arts and research professor at the Life Sciences Institute. "But most of the known substrates for these biocatalysts come from nature, which is just a very small subset of the molecules that chemists work with."

 

Narayan's team envisioned bridging the longstanding gap between the starting compounds chemists are working with and the enzymes that could potentially react with those compounds. The project began with an effort to match proteins with substrates on a large scale. Focusing on one family of enzymes, Alexandra Paton designed a high-throughput reaction platform that allowed the team to test more than 100 substrates against each protein across the entire protein family. 

 

"We discovered hundreds of new connections between chemical space and protein space and built this diverse dataset," said Paton, a former postdoctoral fellow in Naryan's lab and the study's first author. "That is when we began to think more broadly about what we could build with all this data."

 

Narayan's team along with Gabe Gomes, assistant professor of chemical engineering and chemistry at Carnegie Mellon University, and Daniil Boiko, then a graduate student in Gomes' lab, leveraged this dataset to realize an enzyme recommender system. The Gomes lab applied its expertise in machine learning to optimize a predictive model that can navigate between the protein landscape and the chemical landscape.

 

The resulting open-access CATNIP online platform enables chemists to input their starting compound and receive a ranked list of biocatalysts from this protein family that would best enable a chemical transformation; or, going in the other direction, one can start with an enzyme of interest and identify its potential substrates. Boiko describes the platform's predictive capability as analogous to a web search, optimizing the results to ensure the best answers—or the most promising candidates—appear at the top of the list in ranked likelihood of their success.

 

"It is a great starting model to enable synthetic campaigns using biocatalysts," said Paton, who is now an assistant professor of chemistry at University of Rochester. "And there is already work underway to begin expanding the database beyond this one enzyme family."

 

The research was also supported by the Novartis Global Scholars Program, the Camille Dreyfus Teacher Scholar Award and the University of Michigan. Other study authors include Jonathan Perkins and Nicholas Cemalovic of U-M and Thiago Reschützegger of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil.

 

Study: Generation of connections between protein sequence space and chemical space to enable a predictive model for biocatalysis (DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09519-5, available by request or when embargo lifts)

 

D

 

New research shows global economy doubles, but poverty persists and planetary damage deepens


Despite global GDP more than doubling since 2000, billions of people still lack access to essentials like food, housing, and healthcare - while environmental harm has intensified

University of Oxford

Global social shortfall and ecological overshoot 

image: 

Global social shortfall and ecological overshoot. Fanning and Raworth (2025)

view more 

Credit: Fanning and Raworth (2025)




A new study published in Nature shows that as the global economy more than doubled between 2000 and 2022, it still left billions of people without life’s essentials, while rapidly pushing Earth’s life-supporting systems further beyond safe limits.

For the first time, researchers have created an annual global dashboard that tracks 21st century trends in social shortfall and ecological overshoot, and reveals the extent to which wealthy countries drive most of the overshoot while poorer countries bear the brunt of deprivation.

The co-authors of the study, Andrew Fanning, Research & Data Analysis Lead at Doughnut Economics Action Lab (DEAL) and Visiting Research Fellow at the Sustainability Research Institute at the University of Leeds, and Kate Raworth, co-founder of DEAL and Senior Teaching Fellow at the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford, analysed trends across 35 indicators from 2000 to 2022 using the “Doughnut” framework** of social and planetary boundaries.

They say progress on tackling human deprivation must speed up fivefold to meet global goals by 2030, while ecological damage must reverse at nearly twice the current pace to safeguard a stable planet by mid-century.

Key findings:

  • Economic growth has been far outpacing progress in ending poverty: between 2000 and 2022 global GDP more than doubled, but reductions in human deprivation were modest. At current rates, the world is far off track to eliminate critical shortfalls in food, health, education, and housing by 2030.

  • Ecological overshoot has been worsening: by 2022 humanity had already breached at least six of nine planetary boundaries. Repairing the damage requires reversing course nearly twice as fast as the current rate of overshoot.

  • Stark inequalities: the richest 20% of countries (home to 15% of people) are responsible for over 40% of ecological overshoot, while the poorest 40% (home to 42% of people) experience more than 60% of global deprivation.

The researchers emphasise the urgent need to move beyond GDP as the measure of success, and reorient economies to create a “safe and just” future—where social needs are met within Earth’s ecological limits. They have created an interactive webpage* that visualises the study results to support policymakers and practitioners striving to achieve this goal, which will be updated annually to continually monitor progress towards achieving humanity’s social and ecological targets.

Andrew Fanning said: 'Our analysis shows that despite rapid global economic growth, humanity is still leaving billions of people in deprivation while pushing Earth beyond its safe limits. The world is out of balance — we urgently need economies designed to deliver both human wellbeing and planetary health.'

Kate Raworth said: 'Tracking the Doughnut's global trend reveals a stark reality: the fixation on pursuing endless GDP growth - especially in the richest of countries - is fast driving the world away from, not towards, a thriving future. It is time to focus instead on creating economies that are regenerative and distributive by design, for this will be the hallmark of twenty-first century progress.'

-END-

Notes for Editors

https://doughnuteconomics.org/doughnut/ - pre-embargo password: Doughnut2025

** Created in 2012 by Kate Raworth, the Doughnut framework assesses whether the global economy is meeting everyone’s needs within the means of the living planet. The Doughnut consists of two concentric rings: a social foundation, to ensure that no one is left falling short on life’s essentials, and an ecological ceiling, to ensure that humanity does not destabilise the life-supporting systems that sustain all life on Earth. Between these two sets of boundaries lies a doughnut-shaped space that is both ecologically safe and socially just: a space in which humanity can thrive.

The Doughnut monitor will now be updated annually, making it a “report card” for humanity and a key tool that journalists and policymakers alike can use to track global trends in social shortfall and ecological overshoot.

Additional context

  • Country clusters: Researchers grouped 193 countries by average gross national income per capita (2000–2022) into three clusters: poorest 40%, middle 40%, richest 20%.

  • Social shortfall: Measures the proportion of populations falling below minimum social standards in areas such as food, health, education, housing, energy, and access to services. The poorest 40% bear most of the global social shortfall.

  • Ecological overshoot: Assesses per capita consumption relative to downscaled planetary boundaries for climate, nutrients, freshwater, and biodiversity. The richest 20% contribute disproportionately to ecological overshoot.

  • Data year: 2017 (except public transport, 2020). Interactive versions are available on the Doughnut dashboard.

Interviews

For more information or to request an interview with the authors, please contact lizzie.dunthorne@admin.ox.ac.uk

The paper 'Doughnut of social and planetary boundaries monitors a world out of balance' will be published in Nature on 01 October 2025 at 16:00 BST. 

The DOI for the paper will be: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09385-1  

The URL for the paper will be: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09385-1 

A Spanish-language version of this press release is available on request.

Graphics
Global social shortfall and ecological overshoot (2022 data) is attached.
Inequalities across country clusters (2017 data) is attached.

Both graphics are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY). Please attribute the open-access study: Fanning and Raworth (2025).

Online data visualisations
Interactive visualisations publicly available at https://doughnuteconomics.org/doughnut (embargo password: Doughnut2025).

Authors

  • Andrew Fanning (Doughnut Economics Action Lab; University of Leeds; University of Cádiz)
  • Kate Raworth (Doughnut Economics Action Lab; University of Oxford; Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences).

About the Environmental Change Institute

The Environmental Change Institute (ECI) at the University of Oxford, established in 1991, is a world-leading centre for interdisciplinary research on environmental change. ECI brings together expertise across the natural, social, and physical sciences to better understand the causes and consequences of environmental change, and to inform policy and practice for a more sustainable and resilient future.

About the University of Oxford

The University of Oxford has been placed number 1 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the ninth successive year and leads the Guardian University Guide 2026. At the heart of this success are the twin pillars of our ground-breaking research and innovation and our distinctive educational offer.

Oxford is world-famous for research and teaching excellence and home to some of the most talented people from across the globe. Our work helps the lives of millions, solving real-world problems through a huge network of partnerships and collaborations. The breadth and interdisciplinary nature of our research alongside our personalised approach to teaching sparks imaginative and inventive insights and solutions.
 

Journal

DOI

Article Title

Article Publication Date

Inequalities across country clusters 




Clinical characteristics of adults at risk of Medicaid disenrollment due to HR 1 work requirements







 News Release 

'JAMA Network




About The Study: 

Approximately 5 million adults are at risk of Medicaid disenrollment due to HR 1’s work requirements. This population, particularly those ages 50 to 64, has high prevalences of chronic and potentially function-limiting conditions.



Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Ashwin K. Chetty, BS, email ashwin.chetty@yale.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jama.2025.16533)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2025.16533?guestAccessKey=63fee79c-9991-4d57-90d8-4ec1d9e16925&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=100125