Wednesday, October 01, 2025

 

Small change, big impact


Researchers identify major ecological turnover occurred already before the largest warming event of the past 90 million years


MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen

Dr. Heather L. Jones examines tiny plankton fossils using a light microscope. Photo: MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen; M. Toyos Simón 

image: 

Dr. Heather L. Jones examines tiny plankton fossils using a light microscope. Photo: MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen; M. Toyos Simón

view more 

Credit: MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen; M. Toyos Simón





A large proportion of the carbon dioxide emissions that are currently being released into the atmosphere by human activities are absorbed by the surface ocean, making it more acidic. As a result, the tiny organisms (plankton), which lie at the base of the marine food web and make the surface ocean their home, are at risk. The fossil record can tell us how these plankton responded during ancient intervals of climatic change that were similarly associated with increased carbon dioxide emissions. One such event is the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) around 56 million years ago, which can be used as a case study for near-future climate change if carbon dioxide emissions continue to increase (the so-called worst-case scenario). Hundreds of deep-sea sediment archives that span the PETM reveal global turnover in plankton communities due to sea surface warming and ocean acidification.

High-latitude phytoplankton particularly sensitive to climate change

A team of researchers from MARUM, University of Bremen have now investigated how high-latitude phytoplankton communities responded to PETM warming. Examining high-latitude communities is especially important because they are historically understudied and likely to be particularly sensitive to human-driven climate change. The focus of the study was on deep-sea sediment cores from the Campbell Plateau in the Southern Ocean, which were recovered during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 378.

In their study, based on the fossilized remains of calcareous nannoplankton – microscopically small, single-celled algae that photosynthesize in the surface ocean and produce calcium carbonate (e.g., chalk) shells – the team was able to reconstruct changes in their community composition both before and during the PETM. “Certain nannoplankton species prefer to live in warmer waters with less nutrients, whilst others can only live in colder, higher nutrient waters. Therefore, major warming events like the PETM really affect which species thrive, and which don’t. This can be observed in the nannofossil record by counting how many of each species there are and how this changes through time,” explains first author Dr. Heather L. Jones.

Even small changes can have dramatic impacts on marine ecosystems

Somewhat surprisingly, the results from the research team’s study show that the PETM did not seem to affect nannoplankton communities as much as anticipated. They attribute this to a preceding, smaller warming event, which they propose had already destabilized nannoplankton communities approximately 200 thousand years before the PETM. “Most studies only focus on the PETM event itself and not the longer-term time before it,” explains Dr. Heather Jones. “However, examining these background intervals is absolutely critical in determining the extent to which warming events actually drove ecosystem change. In the case of our study, pre-event environmental conditions seem not to have been completely stable, which had a direct influence on how nannoplankton proceeded to respond to the PETM. It also highlights that even relatively small environmental changes can have dramatic impacts on marine ecosystems in certain locations, which has important implications for the current, highly regional effects of modern climate change.”

Archive of legacy deep-sea sediment cores will help with future studies

As the current study is the first to formally document this pre-PETM event, its global significance is uncertain. It therefore sets the stage for future studies to use the expansive archive of legacy deep-sea sediment cores – such as those housed at the Bremen Core Repository (BCR) in the MARUM – to identify this newly-described event in different ocean basins.

The first author, Dr. Heather L. Jones studied the calcareous nannofossils that led the team to the findings of their study, and is a topic that was investigated within the Cluster of Excellence “The Ocean Floor – Earth’s Uncharted Interface”, which is based at MARUM. One research focus of the cluster is how complex ecosystems react under changing environmental conditions.

 

MARUM produces fundamental scientific knowledge about the role of the ocean and the seafloor in the total Earth system. The dynamics of the oceans and the seabed significantly impact the entire Earth system through the interaction of geological, physical, biological and chemical processes. These influence both the climate and the global carbon cycle, resulting in the creation of unique biological systems. MARUM is committed to fundamental and unbiased research in the interests of society, the marine environment, and in accordance with the sustainability goals of the United Nations. It publishes its quality-assured scientific data to make it publicly available. MARUM informs the public about new discoveries in the marine environment and provides practical knowledge through its dialogue with society. MARUM cooperation with companies and industrial partners is carried out in accordance with its goal of protecting the marine environment.

Calcareous nannofossils from the SW Pacific Ocean show that plankton turnover occurred before the PETM. Image: MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen; H. Jones.

Credit

MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen; H. Jones.

 

Fears of Wikipedia’s end overblown, but challenges remain warn researchers



ChatGPT has not decreased activity on the world’s largest online encyclopaedia, but AI data scrapers and the influence of Large Language Models still cast a shadow over its future research suggests




King's College London






ChatGPT has not decreased activity on the world’s largest online encyclopaedia, but AI data scrapers and the influence of Large Language Models still cast a shadow over its future research suggests. 

Work by King’s College London examined changes to the aggregate views of Wikipedia over 12 languages, with six of those languages being open to ChatGPT and the others not. The researchers found no sign of reduced usage since the AI model was introduced in 2022. 

However, they did note a slowed growth in usage in languages where ChatGPT was active compared those where it was not, suggesting the programme has had a limited impact. 

In 2021, a long-time Wikipedia editor infamously raised the idea of the ‘death’ of the platform due to the influence of AI. In this scenario, chatbots like GPT would supplant Wikipedia as the primary source of online information, replacing human editors with AI generated overviews and polluting the information sphere through well documented hallucinations. 

 Some in the industry fear this has come to pass with worldwide web traffic to referral sites, of which Wikipedia is the largest, falling by 15% between June 2024 and June 2025.The paper, published in ACM Collective Intelligence, refutes this form of ‘death’. However, the researchers suggest the cost of running servers due to the influx of AI data scrapers using Wikipedia to train AI model is increasing rapidly, which the website’s moderators say could threaten the current structure of the platform. 

Professor Elena Simperl, Professor of Computer Science at King’s and Co-Director of the King’s Institute for Artificial Intelligence, said “Our work did not confirm the most alarmist scenario, but we’re not out of the woods yet. AI developers are letting their scrapers loose on Wikipedia to train them on high quality data, pushing up traffic to levels where Wikipedia’s servers are struggling to keep up. Generative AI summaries are also using Wikipedia’s data in web searches but not crediting sources, siphoning web traffic away while borrowing the platform’s work.  

“For free services like this, no-one stops to ask how it’s being paid for – and now Wikipedia is having to make the tough decision of where to allocate their limited resources to deal with this. It’s vital as a community we take steps to protect this important platform, and we hope to turn our work into a monitoring tool where the community can track how AI is impacting Wikipedia.” 

Wikipedia is the largest online crowdsourced encyclopaedia, consisting of over 6.6 million articles in 292 languages as of 2023, and is a major source of free information for search engines and numerous online communities. This is particularly case for languages outside of Europe and East Asia, who depend on Wikipedia heavily for access to freely available information. 

Postdoc and first author of the study Neal Reeves suggests there are steps available to protect Wikipedia. “Ultimately, we need a new social contract between AI companies and providers of high-quality data like Wikipedia where they retain more power over their material, while still allowing for their data to be used for training purposes. 

“Collaboration, like that seen in programmes like MLCommons, is needed to reach across the aisle and ensure that the next generation of AI models are trained well, but in a way that doesn’t destroy one of the free internet’s greatest resources.” 

In the future, the team hope to use the feedback they’ve received from the Wikipedia community to develop an openly available monitoring tool that users from across the world can deploy to run analyses on the state of Wikipedia easier with more rigorous analytical methods.  

 

200 Years of KIT – October 7, 2025 will mark the 200th anniversary of its founding



From a three-class school to a university of excellence – KIT is celebrating 200 years of technology, research, teaching, and progress


The Grand Duke founded it out of his “concern for the education of our dear and loyal bourgeoisie.” 


Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)

The Polytechnic School around 1840: The three-story building from 1836, designed by Heinrich Hübsch, is still in use today as the west wing of the main KIT building in Kaiserstraße. (Photo: Unknown, KIT Archives) 

image: 

 

The Polytechnic School around 1840: The three-story building from 1836, designed by Heinrich Hübsch, is still in use today as the west wing of the main KIT building in Kaiserstraße. (Photo: Unknown, KIT Archives)

view more 

Credit: Unknown, KIT Archives





On October 7, 2025, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) celebrates its anniversary. On the same day, exactly 200 ago, Ludwig I, Grand Duke of Baden, signed the founding decree for the Karlsruhe Polytechnic School, the first predecessor institution of today’s University of Excellence. The Grand Duke founded it out of his “concern for the education of our dear and loyal bourgeoisie.” Today, KIT is a place where science is shaping the future by contributing energy, mobility, and climate research as well as robotics and artificial intelligence.

 

The beginnings were quite humble: three classes, a dozen teachers, and classrooms located in the annex of the city church. However, the idea was fueled by a grand vision: Technology and science should serve the public good – for example with building bridges, roads, and towns. At that time, the education was practice-oriented: Using a ruler and a compass, the students analyzed how Johan Gottfried Tulla straighted the river Rhine, they practiced land survey, and learned how to draw with light and shadow – all without having a computer. “If you don’t get your hands dirty, you won’t learn anything about technology,” was the motto of the teachers back then. At that time, there were neither female teachers nor students.

 

From Engineering Lessons to Research for the Future

Gradually, the school of engineering became a university, which merged in 2009 with the Karlsruhe Research Center – the proportion of women among students is currently about 30%. Researchers from Karlsruhe contributed to the development of the periodic table of the elements, proved the existence of electromagnetic waves that enable mobile telephony, WiFi, radio broadcasting, and TV; and they laid the foundation for liquid crystal technology, the basis for today’s touch screens. They constructed Germany’s first nuclear reactor, founded the first department of informatics, and received the first e-mail on German soil. Today, KIT is a University of Excellence. Its researchers today focus on the energy transition, sustainable fuels, better cybersecurity, systems for Industry 4.0, or the mass of neutrinos, revolutionizing our understanding of the universe. 

 

200 Years of Science and Pioneering Spirit

“In 2025, we are celebrating 200 years of science, technology, and pioneering spirit. KIT and its predecessor institutions have been a place of the future since 1825 – not only as a research institution, but also as an educational establishment,” says Professor Jan S. Hesthaven, President of KIT. “It is a place of extraordinary feats and innovative ideas. It is a place where we work together to design and develop things that are visionary today, but could well be taken for granted tomorrow.” 

 

Anniversary Book and Program

On the occasion of the anniversary, the book “Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) From 1825 to 2025 – The First 200 Years” has been published (English version coming soon). It tells the story of KIT with historical images, anecdotes, and surprising insights – from Carl Benz and Heinrich Hertz to the energy transition and AI.

 

Accompanying the jubilee, KIT offers an extensive program as well as an exhibition in the ZKM | Center for Art and Media that will be open until October 19, 2025. 

 

 

Being “The Research University in the Helmholtz Association”, KIT creates and imparts knowledge for the society and the environment. It is the objective to make significant contributions to the global challenges in the fields of energy, mobility, and information. For this, about 10,000 employees cooperate in a broad range of disciplines in natural sciences, engineering sciences, economics, and the humanities and social sciences. KIT prepares its 22,800 students for responsible tasks in society, industry, and science by offering research-based study programs. Innovation efforts at KIT build a bridge between important scientific findings and their application for the benefit of society, economic prosperity, and the preservation of our natural basis of life. KIT is one of the German universities of excellence.

 

Trump is the primary source of US disinformation in POC media, finds ICFJ study



86% of Americans have seen or heard journalists being harassed or abused online, indicating a normalisation of attacks of the US press



City St George’s, University of London

Disarming Disinformation: United States 

image: 

Image showing the spread of disinformation by person in the US during the 2024 US presidential election in Black, Latino and Chinese American press

view more 

Credit: ICF, Scripps Howard Foundation, Gates Foundation, Arizona State University, MIDaS Lab, Philip Merrill College of Journalism, City St George's, University of London





The call is coming from within the house: Trump was the main source and distributor of disinformation in ethnic and Indigenous press in the US, according to a new study published today by the International Center for Journalists; City St George’s, University of London; the University of Maryland; and Arizona State University.

The report, titled ‘Disarming Disinformation: US’, determined disinformation was predominantly spread by domestic political forces rather than foreign states during the 2024 presidential election, based on analysis of thousands of articles and social media posts, alongside dozens of in-depth interviews.

The research connects the prevalence of political disinformation with the normalisation of violence against journalists amid unprecedented attacks on the US press, and a decline in trust in the news.

 Key findings

  • Trump was the most prominent source and distributor of disinformation in ethnic and Indigenous press (showing that disinformation is spreading from within, via domestic political forces rather than through the actions of foreign states)
  • 86% of Americans say they have seen or heard journalists being harassed or abused online, indicating a normalisation of such attacks and reflecting unprecedented political targeting of the US press
  • WhatsApp groups, WeChat channels and other closed digital spaces often act as “information cocoons”, allowing rumours and other forms of disinformation to spread unabated; often using the same channels and methods as financial scams
  • The exclusion or wilful omission of Indigenous community voices in mainstream media coverage feeds disinformation and fuels racist narratives, effectively erasing the everyday experiences and agency of their communities from political discourse
     
  • Trust in the mainstream press continues to decline but there are distinctions along racial lines, with 32% of people of colour (POC) survey participants expressing distrust in the news, compared to 44% of white-identifying participants.

Study methods

The interdisciplinary study was carried out through:

  • Computational analysis of over 10,000 news articles and social media posts during the 2024 US presidential election
  • In-depth case studies focused on five media outlets serving Black, Indigenous, Latino and Asian American communities in the US (including the Haitian Times, which found itself at the epicentre of risk when Haitians were falsely accused of eating their neighbours’ pets by Trump and Vance)
  • Interviews with 45 US journalists working for the Indigenous and ethnic press
  • A public opinion survey of 1020 American adults focused on attitudes to disinformation, targeted attacks on the press and the news media’s democratic function.

The study was led by Professor Julie Posetti (City St George's), Professor Sarah Oates (Maryland) and Professor K. Hazel Kwon (ASU). It was peer reviewed by Dr Lea Hellmueller.

ENDS