Saturday, October 04, 2025

Gazans hail Trump ceasefire call as Hamas agrees to free hostages


Khan Yunis (Palestinian Territories) (AFP) – Smoke billowed over Gaza City on Saturday, yet for the first time in months, residents felt a ceasefire was within reach as they welcomed US President Donald Trump's call for Israel to stop bombing.


Issued on: 04/10/2025 - RFI

The aftermath of an Israeli strike in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on August 20, 2025 © BASHAR TALEB / AFP

"Trump's announcement was very surprising to me, as he has always been biased toward Israel," said 24-year-old Jamila al-Sayyid, from Gaza City's Zeitun neighbourhood.

Despite Trump's appeal, she said "the planes did not stop" bombing, but still felt good about her decision not to flee from the territory's largest urban centre.

"The most important thing is that the ceasefire will take effect and the Israeli prisoners will be released, as they are a pretext for Israel to continue its occupation", she added, referring to the 47 hostages still held in Gaza, including 25 the military says are dead.

Hamas said Friday night it was ready to release the hostages under Trump's ceasefire plan, prompting the US president to urge Israel to immediately stop its strikes.

"I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE. Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the Hostages out safely and quickly!" Trump posted on Truth Social after Hamas gave its agreement.

But Israel's military on Saturday warned northern Gaza remained "a dangerous combat zone" and warned residents not to return.

For Sami Adas of Gaza City, however, it was a "day of joy, a great day".

The 50-year-old, who has been living in a tent with his family in the west of Gaza City, the focus area of Israeli military's operations in recent weeks, said any ceasefire would improve his lot.

"The best thing is that President Trump himself announced a ceasefire, and Netanyahu will not be able to escape this time," Adas said, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

He said the US president "is the only one who can force Israel to comply and stop the war".
Apprehensions remain

Further south, Mahmud Abu Shamala, a 49-year-old living in displacement in the so-called humanitarian area of Al-Mawasi, said that "this ceasefire is a dream I have wished to achieve for two years".

He feared, however, that Israel would not abide by it once Hamas releases the hostages.

Although Trump presented his ceasefire proposal Monday, several sticking points remain.

In talks with Trump, Netanyahu all but rejected the idea of Gaza being governed by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority.

Hamas, for its part, did not address the issue of its own disarmament and the exile of its members, and said more talks were needed to work out the details.

Still, Palestinians felt hope for the first time in months, after ceasefire talks had stalled and Israel attempted to strike Hamas leaders even in Qatar, a key mediator.

"It's enough... the situation is very bad," said Abu Hussein Labad, a displaced man from Jabalia refugee camp.

"I'm injured, and to this day I can't move. The situation is unbearable. God willing, the war will end and we can return to our destroyed homes."

In the West Bank city of Ramallah, Palestinians said Hamas played its hand well under an American ultimatum to respond by Sunday.

"Hamas' stance yesterday was very good," Iyad Safi told AFP.

"God willing, it will be for the good of the people -- the most important thing is the people's interest, that the war stops and things come to an end."

Adnan Naeem, said that "Hamas addressed the urgent issues", in its response.

"The other issues can be discussed later", he said.

(AFP)


‘He didn’t listen to you’: Trump torched for being openly defied in ceasefire demand

Alexander Willis
October 4, 2025 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the press before boarding Marine One to depart for Quantico, Virginia, from the South Lawn at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 30, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno

President Donald Trump is being torched online after being openly defied by Israeli leadership in his call Friday for the Middle Eastern nation to “immediately stop the bombing of Gaza,” with 20 Gazans killed in Israeli strikes over the past 12 hours according to CNN.


“Mr. Trump, it has been one hour since you order Netanyahu to stop bombing Gaza and he didn’t listen to you,” wrote X user “The Palestinian,” who describes themselves as a Palestinian living in Gaza and has amassed nearly 120,000 followers. “Do [you’re] job with him!”

In a Friday social media post, Trump demanded that Israel halt its siege on Gaza based on Hamas’ response to the White House’s proposed peace plan, unveiled on Tuesday alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from the Oval Office. While the plan saw some last-minute changes at the behest of Netanyahu, changes that reportedly infuriated Arab officials, it was received favorably by Hamas, with some caveats.

However, Israeli strikes on Gaza persisted well into Saturday morning according to major news outlets, strikes that critics online argued were in open defiance of Trump’s demands.

“The most intense bombardment of the last two [weeks] is happening right now in direct defiance of what you just posted,” wrote X user “Assaf,” whose profile says they’re Palestinian and has amassed nearly 19,000 followers.

Others pointed to the leverage Trump has in being able to pressure Israel to halt its bombardment, such as X user “Empire of Lies,” who frequently shares content critical of the Trump administration and has amassed nearly 48,000 followers.


“Trump could immediately end the bombing of Gaza with one phone call to Netanyahu,” they wrote. “Trump has enormous leverage. The only question is? Will he use it.”

Netanyahu was reportedly "surprised" by Trump’s demand for Israel to halt its strikes, according to an Israeli official who spoke with Axios reporter Barak Ravid on Friday, and viewed Hamas’ response as an outright rejection of Trump’s proposed peace plan.

Trump issued an apocalyptic threat to Hamas earlier on Friday before his call for Israel to halt its strikes in which he set a Sunday deadline for the organization to either accept the peace plan, or face “hell like no one has ever seen.




Trump urges Israel to stop bombing Gaza after Hamas partially accepts his peace plan

President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Copyright Alex Brandon/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved


By Jeremiah Fisayo-Bambi with AP
Published on 



“I believe they are ready for a lasting peace.” the US president wrote on social media after Hamas announced it was willing to release the hostages and hand over power to other Palestinians.

US President Donald Trump, on Friday, in a social media post, said Israel must stop bombing the Gaza Strip after Hamas said it had accepted some elements of his peace plan to end the nearly two-year war.

Hamas, in its partial agreement to the plan, had said it was willing to release the hostages and hand over power to other Palestinians, but that other aspects of the plan require further consultations among Palestinians.

Taking to his social media page, Trump welcomed the Hamas statement, saying: “I believe they are ready for a lasting peace.”

“Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the Hostages out safely and quickly! Right now, it’s far too dangerous to do that. We are already in discussions on details to be worked out,” the US president wrote.

He later released a celebratory video where he thanked Arab and Muslim countries, specifically Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt and Turkey, along with “so many others.”

“This is a big day,” the US president said. “We’ll see how it all turns out. We have to get the final word down in concrete.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his response, said Israel was prepared for the implementation of the “first stage” of Trump’s plan, apparently referring to the release of hostages.

But his office later said in a statement that Israel was committed to ending the war based on principles it had set out before, without addressing potential gaps with Hamas.

On Saturday, the Israeli army stated in a statement that it was ready for the implementation of the first phase of the Trump plan for the release of the hostages. It added, however, that "all IDF capabilities will be allocated to the Southern Command to ensure the protection of the troops".

Europe widely welcomes the latest ceasefire effort

Friday's announcements were well received by regional actors in the Middle East and across Europe as Trump appeared keen to deliver on pledges to end the war and return dozens of hostages ahead of the second anniversary of the attack on Tuesday.

Key mediators Egypt and Qatar welcomed the latest developments, and Majed Al Ansari, a spokesman for Qatar’s Foreign Ministry, said they would “continue discussions on the plan.”

The EU, in its reaction, described the latest developments as encouraging. saying the moment must be seized. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen added that Europe was ready to support efforts to end civilian suffering and promote the only viable solution for peace, the two-state solution.

French President Emmanuel Macron wrote on social media that “the release of all hostages and a ceasefire in Gaza are within reach!

Macron urged action without delay to make decisive progress towards peace.

The main organisation representing the families of Israeli hostages said Trump’s demand to halt the fighting “is essential to prevent serious and irreversible harm to the hostages.” It called on Netanyahu “to immediately begin efficient and swift negotiations to bring all our hostages home.”

Despite the positive signals, key issues and demands in the peace plan remain unclear and are yet to be decided.

Hamas, in its response, said aspects of the proposal touching on the future of the Gaza Strip and Palestinian rights should be decided based on a “unanimous Palestinian stance” reached with other factions and based on international law.

Its statement also made no mention of Hamas disarming, a key Israeli demand included in Trump’s proposal.

Under the plan, which Trump unveiled earlier this week alongside Netanyahu, Hamas would release the remaining 48 hostages — around 20 of them believed to be alive — within three days. It would also give up power and disarm.

In return, Israel would halt its offensive and withdraw from much of the territory, release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and allow an influx of humanitarian aid and eventual reconstruction. Plans to relocate much of Gaza’s population to other countries would be shelved.

Gaza, with some 2 million Palestinians, would be placed under international governance, with Trump himself and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair overseeing it. The plan provides no path for eventual reunification with the Israeli-occupied West Bank in a future Palestinian state.



Trump orders Israel to stop bombing Gaza


 after Hamas accepts peace plan


Hamas responded to US President Donald Trump's 20-point peace plan to end the war in Gaza on Friday, after the president issued the group an ultimatum to answer by Sunday evening. Hamas announced that it was willing to release hostages, but said some elements of the plan would need to be further discussed.


Issued on: 03/10/2025 - 23:30
By: FRANCE 24


File photo of displaced Palestinians in Rafah, southern Gaza 
taken January 20, 2025. © Jehad Alshrafi, AP


US President Donald Trump on Friday ordered Israel to stop bombing the Gaza Strip after Hamas said it had accepted some elements of his plan to end the nearly two-year war and return all the remaining hostages taken in the October 7, 2023 attack.

Hamas said it was willing to release the hostages and hand over power to other Palestinians, but that other aspects of the plan required further consultations. Senior Hamas officials suggested there were still major disagreements that would need more negotiations.

There was no immediate response from Israel, which was largely shut down for the Jewish Sabbath. Hamas’ response fell short of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s demand that the group surrender and disarm. Israel had earlier accepted Trump’s plan in its entirety.

Trump welcomed Hamas’ statement, saying: “I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE.”

“Israel must immediately stop the bombing of Gaza, so that we can get the Hostages out safely and quickly! Right now, it’s far too dangerous to do that. We are already in discussions on details to be worked out,” he wrote on social media.

Hamas said aspects of the proposal concerning the future of Gaza and Palestinian rights should be decided on the basis of a “unanimous Palestinian stance” reached with other factions and grounded in international law.

The statement made no mention of Hamas disarming, a key Israeli demand included in Trump’s proposal.

Trump appears keen to deliver on pledges to end the war and secure the release of dozens of hostages ahead of the second anniversary of the attack on Tuesday.

Key mediators Egypt and Qatar welcomed the latest developments. Majed Al Ansari, a spokesman for Qatar’s foreign ministry, said they would “continue discussions on the plan”.

A spokesman for UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he “urges all parties to seize the opportunity to bring the tragic conflict in Gaza to an end”. French President Emmanuel Macron wrote on social media that “the release of all hostages and a ceasefire in Gaza are within reach!”

The main organisation representing the families of Israeli hostages said Trump’s demand to halt the fighting “is essential to prevent serious and irreversible harm to the hostages”. It called on Netanyahu “to immediately begin efficient and swift negotiations to bring all our hostages home”.

Earlier, Trump had warned that Hamas must agree to the deal by Sunday evening or face an even greater military onslaught.

“If this LAST CHANCE agreement is not reached, all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas,” Trump wrote on social media. “THERE WILL BE PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.”

Under the plan, unveiled earlier this week alongside Netanyahu, Hamas would release the remaining 48 hostages — around 20 of them believed to be alive — within three days. It would also give up power and disarm.

In return, Israel would halt its offensive and withdraw from much of the territory, release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and allow a surge of humanitarian aid followed by reconstruction. Plans to relocate much of Gaza’s population to other countries would be shelved.

The territory’s 2 million Palestinians would be placed under international governance, overseen by Trump himself and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. The plan offers no path to eventual reunification with the Israeli-occupied West Bank in a future Palestinian state.

Palestinians yearn for an end to the war, but many view this and previous US proposals as strongly favouring Israel.

Trump’s plan “cannot be implemented without negotiations,” Mousa Abu Marzouk, a senior Hamas official based outside Gaza, told Al Jazeera on Friday.

The Hamas statement said it was willing to return all remaining hostages under the plan’s “formula”, apparently referring to an exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. It also reiterated its longstanding openness to handing power over to a politically independent Palestinian body.

But Abu Marzouk said it might be difficult for Hamas to release all the hostages within 72 hours, as it could take days or weeks to locate the remains of some captives.

He added that Hamas was willing to hand over its weapons to a future Palestinian authority running Gaza, but there was no mention of that in the official statement.

Another Hamas official, Osama Hamdan, told Al Araby television that Hamas would reject foreign administration of the Gaza Strip, calling the entry of foreign forces “unacceptable”.

Israel has increased pressure on Hamas since ending a ceasefire in March, sealing off the territory from food, medicine and other goods for two and a half months and seizing, flattening and largely depopulating large areas.

Experts determined that Gaza City had slipped into famine shortly before Israel launched a major offensive aimed at occupying it. An estimated 400,000 people have fled the city in recent weeks, but hundreds of thousands more remain.

Olga Cherevko, a spokesperson for the UN humanitarian office, said she saw several displaced families sheltering in the car park of Shifa Hospital during a visit on Thursday.

“They are not able to move south because they just cannot afford it,” Cherevko told the Associated Press. “One of the families had three children and the woman was pregnant with her fourth. And there were many other vulnerable cases there, including elderly people and people with disabilities.”

Most of Hamas’ senior leaders in Gaza and thousands of its fighters have already been killed, but the group still retains influence in areas outside Israeli military control and launches sporadic attacks.

Hamas has long insisted it will release the remaining hostages — its sole bargaining chip and potential human shields — only in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. Netanyahu has rejected those terms, saying Hamas must surrender and disarm.

On October 7, 2023, thousands of Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, attacking army bases, farming communities and an outdoor music festival, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians. They abducted 251 others, most of whom have since been released in ceasefires or other deals.

Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed more than 66,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s health ministry, which does not specify how many were civilians and how many combatants. It says women and children make up about half the dead.

The ministry is part of the Hamas-run administration, but the UN and many independent experts consider its figures to be the most reliable estimates of wartime casualties.

The offensive has displaced about 90% of Gaza’s population, often repeatedly, and rendered much of the territory uninhabitable.

Both the Biden and Trump administrations have tried to end the fighting and secure the hostages’ release while continuing to provide extensive military and diplomatic support to Israel.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)

Hamas agrees to release all hostages under Trump's Gaza plan, other points need negotiating


Hamas said Friday that it was willing to release all the hostages held in Gaza under US President Donald Trump's plan to end the war in Gaza.


Issued on: 03/10/2025 - 
By: FRANCE 24 


Hamas said Friday that it has accepted some elements of US President Donald Trump's plan to end the war in the Gaza Strip, including giving up power and releasing all remaining hostages, but that others require futher consultations among Palestinians.

The statement came hours after Trump said that Hamas must agree to the deal by Sunday evening, threatening an even greater military onslaught nearly two years into the war sparked by the October 7 attack into Israel. It was unclear how the US and Israel would respond to partial acceptance.

Trump appears keen to deliver on pledges to end the war and return dozens of hostages ahead of the second anniversary of the attack on Tuesday. His peace plan has been accepted by Israel and welcomed internationally, but key mediators Egypt and Qatar have said some elements need further negotiation, without elaborating.

“An Agreement must be reached with Hamas by Sunday Evening at SIX (6) PM, Washington, DC time,” Trump wrote Friday on social media. “Every Country has signed on! If this LAST CHANCE agreement is not reached, all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas. THERE WILL BE PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.”


Under the plan, which Trump unveiled earlier this week alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Hamas would immediately release the remaining 48 hostages – around 20 of them believed to be alive. It would also give up power and disarm.

In return, Israel would halt its offensive and withdraw from much of the territory, release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and allow an influx of humanitarian aid and eventual reconstruction. Plans to relocate much of Gaza's population to other countries would be shelved.

The territory of some 2 million Palestinians would be placed under international governance, with Trump himself and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair overseeing it. The plan provides no path for eventual reunification with the Israeli-occupied West Bank in a future Palestinian state.

A Hamas official told The Associated Press this week that some elements of the plan are unacceptable and need to be amended, without elaborating. Palestinians long for an end to the war, but many view this and previous US proposals as strongly favoring Israel.

Israel has sought to ramp up pressure on Hamas since ending an earlier ceasefire in March. It sealed the territory off from food, medicine and other goods for 2 1/2 months and has seized, flattened and largely depopulated large areas of the territory.

Experts determined that Gaza City had slid into famine shortly before Israel launched a major offensive aimed at occupying it. An estimated 400,000 people have fled the city in recent weeks, but hundreds of thousands more have stayed behind.

Olga Cherevko, a spokesperson for the UN humanitarian office, said she saw several displaced families staying in the parking lot of Shifa Hospital during a visit on Thursday.

“They are not able to move south because they just cannot afford it,” Cherevko told The Associated Press. “One of the families had three children and the woman was pregnant with her fourth. And there were many other vulnerable cases there, including elderly people and people with disabilities.”

Trump wrote that most of Hamas' fighters are "surrounded and MILITARILY TRAPPED, just waiting for me to give the word, ‘GO,’ for their lives to be quickly extinguished. As for the rest, we know where and who you are, and you will be hunted down, and killed.”

Most of Hamas' top leaders in Gaza and thousands of its fighters have already been killed, but it still has influence in areas not controlled by the Israeli military and launches sporadic attacks that have killed and wounded Israeli soldiers.

Hamas has held firm to its position that it will only release the remaining hostages – its sole bargaining chip and potential human shields – in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. Netanyahu has rejected those terms, saying Hamas must surrender and disarm.

Thousands of Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, attacking army bases, farming communities and an outdoor music festival, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians. They abducted 251 others, most of them since released in ceasefires or other deals.

Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 66,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were civilians or combatants. It says women and children make up around half the dead.

The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government, and the UN and many independent experts consider its figures to be the most reliable estimate of wartime casualties.

The offensive has displaced around 90% of Gaza's population, often multiple times, and left much of the territory uninhabitable.

Both the Biden and Trump administrations have tried to end the fighting and bring back the hostages while providing extensive military and diplomatic support to Israel.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)
The Democrats Must Regain the Working-Class Vote in 2026

To win back the House, the party needs an economic agenda that offers a viable path to a sustainable future.


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) appear before a crowd of 20,000 people in Salt Lake City on April 13, 2025.
(Photo: Bernie Sanders/X.com)

C.J. Polychroniou
Oct 04, 2025
Common Dreams


With the Trump administration gradually altering the form of US government from a “flawed democracy” to an emerging dictatorship, the 2026 general midterm election becomes especially important for the future of the country. And for the future of the Democratic Party. The sad and unfortunate reality is that, with the United State being a two-party system, the Democratic Party is the only political alternative to a Trumpian dictatorship. But whether the current Democratic Party is able to fight Trump’s neofascism and actually save America is a dubious proposition at best.

For President Donald Trump to be able to remake everything and thus fulfill his dystopian vision of the United States of America, Republicans know that they must retain control of both chambers of Congress in next fall’s midterm election. For the Democrats to upset Trump’s plans, they need a gain of just three seats to flip the House of Representatives from Republican control and to flip a net of four seats to take control of the Senate.

Trump himself is fully aware of the significance of the outcome of the 2026 general midterm election and has already embarked on a series of strategic moves designed not only to ensure that both chambers of Congress remain under GOP control but that they have wider majorities. First, he has called on GOP-led states to redraw the electoral map in favor of the Republican Party; second, he is using his role as GOP kingmaker to shape the primaries; thirdly, he is trying to change the way people vote by eliminating mail-in ballots and making voter identification a requirement; fourth, he is trying to rebrand “The One Big Beautiful Bill,” which is not popular with voters, and the law’s tax cuts overwhelming benefit the wealthiest Americans, as “a working families tax bill;” and, finally, he has announced on his social media platform, Truth Social, that the Republican Party will hold a convention ahead of the 2026 midterm election in order to show the American people the “great things” that his presidency has done since the presidential election of 2024.

Various polls have shown over the past few months that Trump’s popularity is declining, especially with independents but also, however slightly, with Republicans. Whether this drop will last or not is hard to predict. That said, it is important to underscore the point made by political scientist Larry Bartels and author of such path-breaking works as Unequal Democracy and Democracy Erodes from the Top that, when we discuss the Trump phenomenon, we need to “separate the electoral process from the outcome.” As Bartels states, “The outcome of the election is certainly aberrant and hugely consequential, but the electoral process.… operated in much the same way that it usually does, and in particular, in much the same way that it has over the past quarter century or so.”

In the current political climate, the leadership of the Democratic Party should be able to recognize on its own the urgency of adopting an aggressive class-based approach in order to bring back the working-class vote.

Trump received 49.9% of the popular vote, which is actually less than what George W. Bush received in the 2004 presidential election, and not that different from what other Republican presidential candidates received over the past 20 years. The political landscape is fairly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans and has been so for many years. As such, all is not yet lost. The tide can turn. The only question is whether today’s Democratic Party has what it takes to shift the balance of power in the House and the Senate in 2026. To do so, it needs vision, strategy, and boldness. It needs an economic agenda that offers a viable path to a sustainable future. It needs to fight back against plutocracy and thus put class at the center of politics because it needs to regain the working-class vote.

Most white working-class voters cast their ballots for Trump in all three elections that he ran as president. But this is not a new development related specifically to Trump’s appeal. Working-class voters have been shifting toward the Republican Party over the past few decades, according to data collected from The Vanderbilt Project on Unity & Democracy. Yet, some Democrats did not seem to mindthe defection of the working class to the Republican camp. The great strategist Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) asserted back in 2016 that “for every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.” The fact that this lifelong politician with his long ties to the finance industry is now senate minority leader presumably leading the fight against Trump and his extreme agenda speaks volumes of what has gone so terribly wrong with the Democratic Party.

In saying that the Democrats needs to bring back working-class voters if they expect to regain control of the government, one does not miss the irony that today more Republicans identify themselves as working class than Democrats do. An even bigger irony of course is that neither party is the home of the working-class people.

The truth is that the American working class is trapped in the two-party system. The country needs a mass working-class party, and it is not realistic to expect that it can be built through the Democratic Party, which is a capitalist party. By the same token, building a workers’ party may be a noble and necessary undertaking, but it needs to be recognized that such a political project cannot be completed in a short span of time and that it is very difficult anyway for third parties to tip the electoral scales in the United States. As such, progressive and radicals cannot afford to abandon struggles for the type of reforms that might make an immediate improvement to the lives of working-class people by devoting all their energies to building a new party.

What this suggests is that those aspiring to radical change have to necessarily work mostly outside the system but also do what they can to support the progressive left inside the Democratic Party and cast their votes for progressive candidates running for public office like New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. It is through such activism that the Democratic Party was pushed a bit closer to the left during the last few years.

In the current political climate, the leadership of the Democratic Party should be able to recognize on its own the urgency of adopting an aggressive class-based approach in order to bring back the working-class vote. This is clearly what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are trying to do. Those of us on the sidelines should give them a helping hand. It’s the only way that the tide will turn. And take very seriously next fall’s general midterm election. If the Democrats fail, at the very least, to flip the House, Trump’s dystopian vision for the United States will come ever closer to becoming a reality.




Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


C.J. Polychroniou is a political economist/political scientist who has taught and worked in numerous universities and research centers in Europe and the United States. His latest books are The Precipice: Neoliberalism, the Pandemic and the Urgent Need for Social Change (A collection of interviews with Noam Chomsky; Haymarket Books, 2021), and Economics and the Left: Interviews with Progressive Economists (Verso, 2021).
Full Bio >
Trump and Vought Turn Shutdown Into a ‘Weapon’ to Target Democrats

“It’s going to harm them,” boasted Sen. Mike Lee, a top Trump cheerleader. “Russ Vought, the OMB director, has been dreaming about this moment... since puberty.”



Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), speaks with reporters outside of the West Wing of the White House on July 17, 2025, in Washington, DC. Vought was asked a range of questions pertaining to Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell.
(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)


Stephen Prager
Oct 02, 2025
COMMON DREAMS


President Donald Trump is using the government shutdown to carry out an unprecedented attack on his enemies through more layoffs of federal workers and cuts to grants aimed at blue states.

In the Oval Office Tuesday, hours before the shutdown began, Trump told reporters that “when you shut it down, you have to do layoffs. So, we’d be laying off a lot of people that are going to be very affected, and they’re Democrats. They’re gonna be Democrats.”

In the days leading up to the shutdown, congressional Democrats attempted to force Republicans to roll back cuts to Medicaid and Affordable Care Act subsidies—cuts that are expected to result in as many as 15 million Americans losing their health insurance while raising premiums for tens of millions more. Trump and the GOP have blamed Democrats for the shutdown, falsely claiming that theyare pushing to fund free healthcare for “illegal aliens.”

However, they’ve struggled to make this story land with the American public. A Washington Post poll released Thursday found that 47% of US adults blame Trump and Republicans for the shutdown, while just 30% blame Democrats and 23% say they are unsure. The sample was divided roughly equally between those who voted for Trump and those who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris (D) in 2024.

In what Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) called an effort to use “taxpayer dollars to try and shift blame,” the websites for numerous government agencies—including the US departments of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as well as Justice, Agriculture, and several others—were updated with banners that blamed “Democrats” and the “Radical Left” for the shutdown.

Meanwhile, government employees, including those at the Small Business Administration (SBA) were directed to include similar partisan language in their out-of-office auto-reply emails.



Experts have told Politico that the use of taxpayer money for such explicit partisan messaging likely violates multiple ethics laws, including the Anti-Lobbying Act, which forbids the use of appropriated funds for lobbying activities designed to “support or defeat legislation pending before Congress.” It also pushes the boundaries of the Hatch Act, which requires federal programs to be used in a nonpartisan fashion.

The progressive consumer watchdog group Public Citizen said it has filed complaints against HUD and the SBA for what it said was an “obvious Hatch Act violation.”

“The SBA and other agencies increasingly adopting this illegal, partisan tactic think they can get away with it because Trump has gutted any and all ethics oversight of the federal government,” said Craig Holman, a government ethics expert with Public Citizen.

After being asked about Trump’s promise to lay off “Democrats” at a press conference on Wednesday, Vice President JD Vance told reporters, “We are not targeting federal agencies based on politics.”

But in a Truth Social post early Thursday morning Trump struck a somewhat different tone. He spoke of plans to meet with Russell Vought, the director of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), “to determine which of the many Democrat Agencies, most of which are a political SCAM, he recommends to be cut. I can’t believe the Radical Left Democrats gave me this unprecedented opportunity.”

Trump also proudly described Vought as “he of PROJECT 2025 fame,” referencing his leading role in crafting the Heritage Foundation’s infamous blueprint for a far-right takeover of government—a takeover carried out in part through the purging of civil servants disloyal to Trump. During the 2024 election, Trump repeatedly insisted that he had “nothing to do with” Project 2025.



Vought has already begun to unilaterally withhold congressionally appropriated dollars for projects specifically for blue cities and states.

On Wednesday, he said that $18 billion in subway and tunnel funding for New York City had been “put on hold to ensure funding is not flowing based on unconstitutional [diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)] principles.” Not long before that, Trump had threatened to entirely cut off federal funding to the city if its voters elect the democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee and current frontrunner, as its next mayor in November.

Vought then announced Thursday that he was also stripping away another nearly $8 billion worth of funding for climate-related projects, referring to it as “Green New SCAM funding to fuel the Left’s climate agenda.” Vought said that the funding was being withheld exclusively from projects in states led by Democrats: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington state.



House Republicans were reportedly told by Vought on Wednesday that mass firings would also begin in “one to two” days, though he did not outline specifics about who would be fired. However, a memo Vought issued last week instructed agencies to prepare to eliminate employees “not consistent with the president’s priorities,” triggering a lawsuit from federal workers’ unions.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told the press Thursday that Vought was carrying out these cuts “reluctantly” and is “not enjoying the responsibility” of deciding which programs and employees get the axe.

But in an interview on Fox News, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), a top Trump cheerleader, was a bit more candid, proudly declaring that Trump and Vought are using the shutdown specifically to hurt Democrats.

“They’re doing it deliberately. It’s going to harm them,” Lee said. “Because Russ Vought, the OMB director, has been dreaming about this moment, preparing for this moment, since puberty.”

Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.) said that “Vought is pushing a scheme to turn a government shutdown into a weapon to fire career civil servants and dismantle programs Congress has already passed into law. That is not only reckless. It is flatly illegal and unconstitutional.”

“Have we ever had a president work so hard to hurt the people he represents?” asked Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.). “I’m not going to be intimidated by these crooks.”
Media Faces Reckoning After Helping Trump Downplay Project 2025 on Campaign Trail

“A Trump denial is not a fact,” said one media critic.


The Democratic National Committee sponsors a billboard about then-Republican candidate Donald Trump and Project 2025 at 12th & Vine Streets on September 9, 2024, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
(Photo by Lisa Lake/Getty Images for the Democratic National Committee)

Stephen Prager
Oct 03, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

As President Donald Trump openly embraces Project 2025, mainstream media outlets are facing criticism for their role in helping him downplay his ties to the wildly unpopular far-right governing playbook in the lead-up to his reelection last year.

After she became the Democratic nominee in July, former Vice President Kamala Harris made the Heritage Foundation’s over 900-page manifesto for “the next conservative president” central to her case against Trump during the 2024 election, often referring to it as “Trump’s Project 2025.”

She and other Democrats warned that if he retook power, he would swiftly enact many of its most extreme and unpopular proposals and dramatically expand executive power while doing it.

Among those proposals were steep cuts to social safety net programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the “mass deportations” of millions of immigrants, the elimination of the Department of Education, new restrictions on abortions, the gutting of climate protections, and the replacement of career civil servants with political appointees, among many others.

Democrats amplified the plan’s danger at the Democratic National Convention and in campaign ads, and Trump began to distance himself from the platform. Despite the fact that as many as 140 people who’d worked in his first administration—including Paul Dans, Heritage’s director of Project 2025—had a hand in its creation, Trump said: “I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it.”

This was demonstrably untrue, even at the time. Media Matters for America dug up a clip from as far back as May 2023 of Dans stating that “President Trump’s very bought in with this,” speaking of the program.



Project 2025 was almost inconceivably unpopular. An NBC News poll from September 2024 showed that while 57% of registered voters viewed the plan negatively, just 4% viewed it positively.

But in the critical months leading up to the election, many media outlets took Trump’s denial at face value, publishing fact checks and other commentary that painted Democrats’ warnings about his connection to the plan as alarmist or misleading.



Responding to a social media post in July stating that “Trump has made his authoritarian intentions quite clear with his Project 2025 plan,” a fact check by USA Today rated the statement “false,” because, as the headline said, “Project 2025 is an effort by the Heritage Foundation, not Donald Trump.”

In September, after Harris confronted Trump about Project 2025 at the first and only debate between the two, the paper published another fact-check with the headline: “Harris repeats claim that Project 2025 is Trump’s plan. That’s still not right.”

In response to Harris’ claim during the debate that Project 2025 was “a detailed and dangerous plan... that the former president intends on implementing if he were elected,” Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler, whose coverage received a fair bit of criticism during the 2024 cycle, reported in bold text that “Project 2025 is not an official campaign document.”

A CNN fact check of the Harris campaign’s social media in September remarked that one account “frequently invokes Project 2025,” before caveating that “Project 2025 is not Trump’s initiative, and he has said he disagrees with some of its proposals.”

In an October interview on CBS‘s “Face the Nation,” anchor Norah O’Donnell, Harris attempted to warn about Project 2025, before O’Donnell responded: “You know that Donald Trump has disavowed Project 2025. He says that is not his campaign plan.”



After nine months back in power, the website Project 2025 Tracker estimates that Trump has already implemented approximately 48% of the objectives outlined in the policy document.

In addition to his key campaign promises many of his second administration’s policies are highly specific to Project 2025, such as his pledge to abolish the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), his efforts to privatize the National Weather Service (NWS), his reconfiguration of Title X funding to promote pregnancy, and his elimination of the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.

Trump is no longer hiding his connection to Project 2025, having brought in many of its hiring picks and authors to staff his administration almost immediately after his victory last November.

This week, he began to boast about it openly. As his Office of Management and Budget (OMB) director, Russ Vought, one of Project 2025’s architects, began using the current government shutdown to unilaterally cut off funding to infrastructure projects in blue states and cities, Trump lauded him as “he of PROJECT 2025 Fame.”

“This was always the plan,” Harris responded on social media.



While many commentators expressed outrage that Trump blatantly lied about his connections to Project 2025, others dredged up old clips of newspapers and anchors taking him at his word.

“All those 2024 media fact checks that said, ‘Donald Trump and the Trump campaign deny any connection to Project 2025’ look pretty ridiculous right now,” said MeidasTouch editor-in-chief Ron Filipkowski. “A Trump denial is not a fact. You just used his lies to ‘debunk’ a reality that was obvious to anyone paying attention.”

Mehdi Hasan, the founder of the independent media company Zeteo, highlighted the CBS interview, saying Trump’s embrace of Project 2025 was “embarrassing not just for Norah O’Donnell but a whole host of leading American anchors and reporters who echoed Trump’s false denials.”

“Nothing showed the difference between mainstream and independent media better than the response to Trump’s obvious lie about not knowing anything about Project 2025,” said David Pepper, author of the book Saving Democracy: A User’s Manual. “Most mainstream media started fact-checking those who claimed a connection to be somehow false. Others ‘both sides’ed’ it. Far more in independent media called it out as a whopping lie.”


Bernie Sanders: Trump's shutdown outrage shows we are living in truly dangerous times
 Via Common Dreams
October 2, 2025 

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speaks in Philadelphia. REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger

Make no mistakes about it, we are living in dangerous and unprecedented times as we combat Donald Trump‘s oligarchy, authoritarianism, kleptocracy, and his horrific attacks against working families.

We have more income and wealth inequality than we’ve ever had; we have more corporate control of the media than we’ve ever had; we have more billionaire money buying elections than we’ve ever had.

We have a major housing and educational crisis, people are going to the grocery store and can’t afford the food their families need, and we have a health care system that is completely broken.

Meanwhile, we have a president who is a pathological liar, who has little regard for the rule of law, who is suing media outlets that criticize him, threatening to jail his political opponents and talking about the military invading U.S. cities as practice.

And on Tuesday night, as you know, the government shut down because — for the first time in modern history — Trump and the Republican Party are approaching a budget conversation that requires 60 votes with a take it or leave it approach.


I will not take it.


I will not allow Donald Trump and the Republican Party to take away health care from 15 million people by making the largest cut to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act in history.

I will not allow Donald Trump and the Republican Party to increase health insurance premiums by 75 percent, on average, for over 20 million Americans who get their health care through the Affordable Care Act.

I will not allow Donald Trump and the Republican Party to fund this by giving a $1 trillion tax break to people like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and the other oligarchs in the top 1 percent.


I will not allow Donald Trump and the Republican Party to undermine modern medicine and the health and well-being of our children by rejecting the scientific evidence regarding vaccines.

I will not allow Donald Trump and the Republican Party to allow this country to be moved toward authoritarianism by putting federal troops on city streets without a request from a governor or mayor.

I was asked ahead of the vote if I would just continue to vote NO over and over again until these issues are addressed, and you are damn right I will.


Donald Trump and my colleagues in the Republican Party may not stay up late at night worrying about people who can’t afford health care, the medicine they need to survive, groceries and an education for their children, but I do.

Republicans will not have my vote to fund the government unless they find a sense of morality and do the right thing on health care, income and wealth inequality, and stopping Donald Trump’s march toward authoritarianism.

I want the Republicans to go back to their districts and ask their constituents whether or not they believe it’s a good idea to take away health care from millions of Americans to give Bezos and Musk a tax break.


I suspect they will not like the answer they hear.

So no. Republicans will not have my vote to fund the government unless they find a sense of morality and do the right thing on health care, income and wealth inequality, and stopping Donald Trump’s march toward authoritarianism.

Until that happens it is important for all of us to stand up and make our voices heard.


Will it be easy? Of course not.

Is it possible? Only if everyone does their part.

Let me remind you, history has always taught us that real change never takes place from the top on down. It always occurs from the bottom on up. It occurs when ordinary people get sick and tired of oppression and injustice — and fight back. That is the history of the founding of our nation, the abolitionist movement, the labor movement, the civil rights movement, the women’s movement and more.


Sisters and brothers, we are living in dangerous times. Maybe more dangerous than any point in American history since the Civil War.

But this is a struggle that, for ourselves and future generations, we cannot lose.

Let us go forward together in solidarity




Vast Majority of Americans—Including Trump Supporters—Want Health Insurance Subsidies Extended: Poll


The KFF poll shows the public will blame President Donald Trump and the Republican Party if the subsidies are allowed to expire.


Brad Reed
Oct 03, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

As the shutdown of the US federal government drags on, a new poll from KFF shows that the vast majority of Americans are supportive of Democrats’ top negotiating demand.

In total, the newest KFF Health Tracking Poll has found that 78% of Americans want Congress to extend enhanced tax credits for people who buy their health insurance through exchanges established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), compared to just 22% of Americans who want to let the credits expire.

GOP Pushes ‘Big... Brazen’ Lie About Immigrants to Justify Ripping Healthcare Away From Millions



Bernie and AOC Explain How Trump and GOP Are About to Double Insurance Premiums for Millions of Americans

KFF found that majorities of Americans across all political demographics want the subsidies extended, including 92% of Democrats, 82% of independents, and even 57% of Republicans who identify themselves as part of President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement.

KFF’s poll also found that Trump and the GOP will likely shoulder the most blame if the enhanced subsidies aren’t extended.


“About 4 in 10 (39%) adults who want to see the tax credits extended say that if Congress does not extend these enhanced tax credits, President Trump deserves most of the blame, while another 4 in 10 (37%) say the same about Republicans in Congress,” KFF explains. “About 2 in 10 (22%) say that Democrats in Congress deserve most of the blame.”

The KFF poll also showed that many Americans would likely lose their insurance if the tax credits weren’t extended. In fact, 42% of those who bought insurance on the individual market said they would go without insurance should their premiums double, which is what many analysts have projected will happen if the subsidies aren’t kept in place.

Recent research from KFF found that most people who buy insurance through the ACA are set to see their premiums rise by over 75% unless Congress steps in and renews enhanced subsidies that had been passed into law under the American Rescue Plan in 2021.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday that the Trump administration is expressing alarm behind the scenes about the political ramifications of allowing the tax credits to expire, and some White House staffers “are discussing proposals to extend the enhanced subsidies.”


The Journal report also noted that Trump pollster Tony Fabrizio has been sounding the alarm for months about the electoral vulnerabilities Republicans face if they fail to act on insurance subsidies, and he wrote in a memo over the summer that the issue could even hurt the GOP among their own base voters.

“By broad bipartisan margins, voters want to see the tax credits extended rather than expire at the end of the year, whether in the context of premiums doubling or 5 million families losing their health insurance,” the memo said. “This includes solid majorities of Trump voters and swing voters.”

The expiring subsidies aren’t the only threat to Americans’ healthcare, as Republicans over the summer passed a massive budget law that cut spending on Medicaid by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade, which the Congressional Budget Office estimated would result in more than 10 million people, among the nation’s poorest, losing their coverage. Congressional Democrats have also demanded undoing some Medicaid cuts in government shutdown negotiations.
Bernie and AOC Explain How Trump and GOP Are About to Double Insurance Premiums for Millions of Americans

“This messaging is approximately 142 times better,” said one political observer, “than Democrats are getting from leadership.”


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wave during a stop of the ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ rally in Folsom, Calif., Tuesday, April 15, 2025.
(Photo by Stephen Lam/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Oct 02, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

Amid the ongoing government shutdown fight in Congress, two of America’s top progressive lawmakers on Wednesday released a video explaining exactly how President Donald Trump and his Republican allies are going to jack up Americans’ health insurance premiums.

In the video, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) explained their decisions to vote against the continuing resolution being put forth by Republicans to reopen the federal government



“This is one of the dirtiest tricks being pulled on the American people right now,” Ocasio-Cortez said of the continuing resolution. “Starting today, October 1, and throughout the rest of the month, Americans across this country are going to start getting notifications that their insurance premiums are up to doubling.”

“Say that again,” Sanders responded.

“Monthly insurance premiums are going to double for millions of people across the country,” Ocasio-Cortez emphasized.

Sanders then interjected to emphasize that this premium hike was coming “at a time when we are already paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for healthcare, at a time when people can’t afford it right now.”

Ocasio-Cortez then listed some of the negative consequences that could come from not passing legislation to extend the enhanced subsidies for people who buy their insurance through the exchanges created by the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA).

“That means people getting bankrupt over chemotherapy, people going to the pharmacy and not being able to get their insulin, and frankly, it means a lot of Americans are going to be in danger,” she said. “And Republicans want us to rubber stamp that.”

Sanders closed the video by reminding viewers that the US healthcare system is already “broken,” given that “we’re the only major country on Earth to not guarantee healthcare to all people.”

“And these guys,” he said, referring to Republicans, “want to make it even worse. We’re not going to let that happen.”



Many political observers praised the video made by Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez for directly telling Americans, in plain language, the stakes of the current shutdown fight.

“This messaging is approximately 142 times better (highly scientific estimate) than Democrats are getting from leadership,” said polling expert Nate Silver.

Roberto Cabral Duran, vice president of strategic communications, geopolitics, and corporate affairs at global consulting firm Teneo, said that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez delivered “a brilliant piece of political communication” with their video.

“It’s clear, it addresses an issue close to all voters, and it helps further alienate people from the GOP’s position,” he said. “AOC and Bernie did it again.”

Jon Favreau, co-host of Pod Save America, also said that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez were running laps around Democratic leadership in terms of effective messaging.

“The two most prominent progressives in America who support Medicare for All deliver the most compelling message of anyone in the party about ACA subsidies,” he said. “They’re also doing it without posting cringe jokes and memes from young staffers. A lesson, perhaps!”

Recent research from KFF found that most people who buy insurance through the ACA are set to see their premiums rise by over 75% unless Congress steps in and renews enhanced subsidies that had been passed into law under the American Rescue Plan in 2021.

The expiring subsidies aren’t the only threat to Americans’ healthcare, as Republicans over the summer passed a massive budget law that cut spending on Medicaid by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade, which the Congressional Budget Office estimated would result in more than 10 million people, among the nation’s poorest, losing their coverage.