Sunday, October 05, 2025

SPACE/COSMOS


NASA's Voyager 1 Revealed A Stunning Discovery At The Edge Of Our Solar System

Nicolae Bochis
Sun, October 5, 2025
BGR


Image of a Voyager space probe - Artsiom P/Shutterstock

Voyager 1, launched in 1977, has traveled farther than any spacecraft in human history. After more than four decades of silent endurance through space, it now sails beyond the orbit of the outer planets of the solar system. Its mission has transcended planetary flybys; it's now humanity's first direct way to explore interstellar space. NASA has used radio to talk to Voyager 1 as it stumbled upon something astonishing hiding at the farthest reaches of our solar system: a mysterious "wall of fire." This may sound like it came right out of a sci-fi story, yet it's part of the very real final frontier where no man has gone before. What this "wall of fire" truly represents is still being investigated, but it is shown to be the heliopause — in other words, the borderline where our sun stops having any influence on anything beyond it.

This outer layer is created by the solar winds interacting with interstellar gases, which results in superheated plasma. Voyager discovered that this remote region of our solar system reaches extremely hot temperatures of 30,000 to 50,000 Kelvin (54,000 to 90,000 degrees Fahrenheit). Fortunately for spacecraft like Voyager, the particle density is too low for this heat to be transferred, so we can continue sending out probes without the risk of overheating. But this discovery at the edge of our solar system is more than merely a scientific milestone.

Read more: What Does Space Actually Smell Like? Here's What Scientists Say

The extremes of the heliopause


Depiction of the heliopause - NASA/IBEX/Adler Planetarium/Wikimedia Commons

What scientists are calling the "wall of fire" is more formally known as the heliopause. It's the invisible boundary that marks the outermost edge of the sun's influence. The heliosphere is a vast bubble in which the solar wind — a stream of charged particles constantly blowing outwards from the sun — shields our solar system from harsh radiation that comes from interstellar space. However, that protective influence has a limit. At a certain point, the solar wind collides with the ionized gas and plasma (and other particles known as the interstellar medium) between the stars, slowing, compressing, and creating a turbulent frontier.

It's not only the existence of the heliopause that's so striking; it's also the unexpected extremes that Voyager 1 has discovered there (not to mention a strange hum). As the spacecraft got closer to this boundary, its instruments recorded sudden changes in particle density and magnetic fields. These are the signatures of a region far more turbulent than scientists imagined. Instead of a smooth and gradual fade between solar and interstellar space, Voyager 1 found abrupt shifts, almost like stepping over a threshold.

The most surprising revelation was the temperature dynamics. Near the heliopause, charged particles become trapped and compressed, creating zones of extraordinary heat. Other nearby regions remain relatively cooler. This produces a patchwork of hot and cold plasma, unlike anything observed inside the heliosphere. That's why this contrast was nicknamed "the wall of fire," evoking an image of fiery clashes of energy at the boundary of the solar system.

The magnetic environment added another twist. Voyager 1 detected magnetic field lines that appeared stronger and more orderly than expected. That suggests that the interstellar magnetic fields may be pressing harder against the heliosphere than previously believed. This tension between magnetic fields is what shapes the boundary and warps it like a balloon under pressure.


Voyage through the wall of fire



Depiction of Voyager 1's view of the solar system - NASA, ESA, and G. Bacon (STScI)/Wikimedia Commons

Together, these discoveries reveal that the edge of our solar system is not a quiet fade into the galactic vastness, but a dynamic frontier. Forces from within and beyond clash and shape each other in unpredictable ways. For scientists, the solar system frontier is a laboratory in its own right, where natural experiments unfold to reveal how stars and their planetary systems carve out bubbles in the galaxy.

Voyager 1 is now traveling through interstellar space, and each measurement it makes is unprecedented, a first for humanity. It has already crossed into the region where the solar wind is weak. There, the magnetic fields grow more complex, and particles from beyond our solar system begin to dominate. What's more, the heliopause is not a solid wall, but a dynamic, shifting interface between two realms. It separates the familiar space where our sun governs, and the vast, unknown territory beyond the confines of our solar system. Voyager 1 probing this frontier helps scientists answer questions on how our solar system interacts with the rest of our galaxy and how far the sun's influence really extends. What lies in the space beyond?

Each faint signal Voyager 1 sends back to Earth has to travel more than 24 billion kilometers to reach us, and each of those signals is just a fragment of the answer. But now we know that our solar system doesn't just end abruptly: It transitions into a complex and fiery border with the rest of the galaxy.



We Finally Know How The Lights Switched on at The Dawn of Time

Michelle Starr
Sat, October 4, 2025 
SCIENCE ALERT




We may finally know what first lit up the cosmic dawn in the early Universe.

According to data from the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes, the origins of the free-flying photons in the early cosmic dawn were small dwarf galaxies that flared to life, clearing the fog of murky hydrogen that filled intergalactic space. A paper about the research was published in February 2024.

"This discovery unveils the crucial role played by ultra-faint galaxies in the early Universe's evolution," said astrophysicist Iryna Chemerynska of the Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris.

"They produce ionizing photons that transform neutral hydrogen into ionized plasma during cosmic reionization. It highlights the importance of understanding low-mass galaxies in shaping the Universe's history."

Related: 7 Baffling Space Mysteries We're Dying For Scientists to Solve

At the beginning of the Universe, within minutes of the Big Bang, space was filled with a hot, dense fog of ionized plasma. What little light there was wouldn't have penetrated this fog; photons would simply have scattered off the free electrons floating around, effectively making the Universe dark.

As the Universe cooled, after about 300,000 years, protons and electrons began to come together to form neutral hydrogen (and a little bit of helium) gas.

Most wavelengths of light could penetrate this neutral medium, but there was very little in the way of light sources to produce it. But from this hydrogen and helium, the first stars were born.

Those first stars delivered radiation that was strong enough to peel electrons away from their nuclei and reionize the gas. By this point, however, the Universe had expanded so much that the gas was diffuse, and could not prevent light from shining out.

By about 1 billion years after the Big Bang, the end of the period known as the cosmic dawn, the Universe was entirely reionized. Ta-da! The lights were on.

But because there's so much murk in the cosmic dawn, and because it's so dim and far away across time and space, we've had trouble seeing what's there.

Scientists thought that the sources responsible for most of the clearing must have been powerful – huge black holes whose accretion produces blazing light, for example, and large galaxies in the throes of star formation (baby stars produce a lot of UV light).

JWST was designed, in part, to peer into the cosmic dawn and try to see what lurks therein. It's been very successful, revealing all sorts of surprises about this crucial time in the formation of our Universe. Surprisingly, the telescope's observations now suggest that dwarf galaxies are the key player in reionization.


A JWST deep field image with some of the sources the researchers identified as drivers of reionization. (Hakim Atek/Sorbonne University/JWST)

An international team led by astrophysicist Hakim Atek of the Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris turned to JWST data on a galaxy cluster called Abell 2744, backed up by data from Hubble.

Abell 2744 is so dense that space-time warps around it, forming a cosmic lens; any distant light traveling to us through that space-time becomes magnified. This allowed the researchers to see tiny dwarf galaxies close to the cosmic dawn.

Then, they used JWST to obtain detailed spectra of these tiny galaxies. Their analysis revealed that, not only are these dwarf galaxies the most abundant galaxy type in the early Universe, they are far brighter than expected.

More in Science



Astrophotographers capture new views of Comet C/2025 A6 (Lemmon)


In fact, the team's research shows that dwarf galaxies outnumber large galaxies by 100 to 1, and their collective output is four times the ionizing radiation usually assumed for larger galaxies.

"These cosmic powerhouses collectively emit more than enough energy to get the job done," Atek said.

"Despite their tiny size, these low-mass galaxies are prolific producers of energetic radiation, and their abundance during this period is so substantial that their collective influence can transform the entire state of the Universe."


The field of view for Abell 2744. An estimated 50,000 sources of near-infrared light are represented in this image. (NASA, ESA, CSA, I. Labbe/Swinburne University of Technology, R. Bezanson/University of Pittsburgh, A. Pagan/STScI)More

It's the best evidence yet for the force behind reionization, but there's more work to be done. The researchers looked at one small patch of the sky; they need to make sure that their sample isn't just an anomalous cluster of dwarf galaxies, but is a representative sample of the entire population in the cosmic dawn.

They intend to study more cosmic lens regions of the sky to obtain a wider sample of early galactic populations. But just on this one sample, the results are incredibly exciting. Scientists have been chasing answers on reionization for as long we've known about it. We're on the brink of finally blowing away the fog.

"We have now entered uncharted territory with the JWST," said astrophysicist Themiya Nanayakkara of Swinburne University of Technology in Australia.

"This work opens up more exciting questions that we need to answer in our efforts to chart the evolutionary history of our beginnings."

The research has been published in Nature.

This NASA Satellite Sent The First Radar Images Of Earth's Surface And The Results Are Very Clear

Max Miller
Sat, October 4, 2025 

 SlashGear.


Rendering of the NISAR satellite orbiting Earth - NASA


New images of Earth's surface were captured by the NISAR satellite, marking a milestone in a joint space mission between India and the United States. The images depict portions of Maine and North Dakota and were taken with a specialized radar capable of new levels of topographical detail, and which is expected to help predict natural disasters.

Satellite NISAR, short for the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar, was launched on July 30, and the newly released images were captured on August 21. The images of Maine's coast show an incredible level of detail, with buildings and other hard surfaces clearly differentiated from dense forest and open water. Meanwhile, the images of North Dakota reveal distinctions between forest and wetland, cultivated and fallow fields, and the Forest River versus irrigation systems.

NASA Associate Administrator Amit Kshatriya emphasized the future scientific achievements heralded by the images from NISAR, as well as the deepening collaboration between India and the United States that they represent in an era of increasingly privatized space exploration. In a press release, Kshatriya stated that "By understanding how our home planet works, we can produce models and analysis of how other planets in our solar system and beyond work." But there are more immediate implications for the technology here on Earth, and this may be only the beginning of a new era for development and even disaster prevention.

NISAR will aid climate forecasting and disaster preparation efforts


Coastal Maine captured by NISAR satellite - NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory

The images captured by NISAR were taken using the satellite's titular L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR), which could prove a valuable tool for understanding the pace and scale of climate change, as well as for disaster preparation efforts and forecasting. It works by emitting an energy pulse, which bounces off Earth and is recaptured by the satellite. Compared to traditional photography — even advanced satellite photography — SAR interacts with the physical terrain it captures to give researchers a detailed picture of water bodies, forests, and even soil. An S-band radar is also onboard, which is more suited to vegetation close to the ground. The technology overcomes a variety of obstacles to using radar in space, including the distance from satellite to ground and the speed of its travel.

According to Nicky Fox, the associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate, NISAR imagery will produce "data and insights that will enable scientists to study Earth's changing land and ice surfaces in unprecedented detail while equipping decision-makers to respond to natural disasters and other challenges." In addition to monitoring agricultural conditions and certain natural ecosystems, NISAR photography will track signs of natural disasters from volcanic eruptions to earthquakes and even landslides. As natural disasters increase with the pace of climate change, NISAR will provide insights for flood mapping, wildfires, oil slicks, glacial motion, and land subsidence, among others. It can track movements down to a centimeter and will continuously monitor the Earth, making two full rotations every 12 days.

NISAR is the result of international scientific collaboration


North Dakota farmland captured by NISAR satellite - NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory

The images from the NISAR satellite are the culmination of over a decade's worth of scientific collaboration between the United States and India. The satellite takes its name from the respective names of NASA and ISRO (the Indian Space Research Organization), which began their collaboration nearly 11 years ago in September 2014. Both countries are large and climate diverse, with enormous agricultural sectors and potential hazards. The benefit of synthetic aperture radar technology for each nation was clear enough, and as NASA began to explore the technology, ISRO identified complementary mission objectives and signed on.

NISAR was initially meant to launch in 2024, but it was pushed back to 2025 when NASA discovered that the satellite's antenna was at risk of exposure to high temperatures. In order to resolve the issue, a special coating was added. Even after that work was completed, the launch had to wait until after February 2025 to avoid putting NISAR into an orbit that would also expose it to fluctuating temperatures.

NISAR finally launched from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre at Sriharikota in Andhra Pradesh, India, at 6 p.m. on July 30. With the satellite now in orbit and its first images taken as proof of the mission's success, it is expected to continue taking images and measurements that can be used to advance scientific research. It is currently on a baseline mission of three years, though it's likely the joint project will continue in some fashion if it continues to bear out. NASA, for its part, has big plans, with its next major venture being a lunar mission over 50 years since the last one.



Planet Y? Astronomers find fresh clues of hidden world in our solar system

Jacopo Prisco, CNN
Fri, October 3, 2025 


An illustration showing Planet Nine, a hypothetical, undiscovered planet in our solar system. New research now suggests the possibility of Planet Y, which would be smaller and orbiting closer to the sun than Planet Nine. - NASA


The search for an unknown planet in our solar system has inspired astronomers for more than a century. Now, a recent study suggests a potential new candidate, which the paper’s authors have dubbed Planet Y.

The planet has not been detected but merely inferred by the tilted orbits of some distant objects in the Kuiper Belt — a large ring of icy bodies beyond Neptune’s orbit. Something, the researchers said, must be disturbing these orbits and tilting them.

“One explanation is the presence of an unseen planet, probably smaller than the Earth and probably bigger than Mercury, orbiting in the deep outer solar system,” said lead author Amir Siraj, an astrophysicist and a doctoral candidate in the department of astrophysical sciences at Princeton University. “This paper is not a discovery of a planet, but it’s certainly the discovery of a puzzle for which a planet is a likely solution.” Siraj and his coauthors reported their findings in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters.

Planet Y is the latest in a series of hypothetical solar system planets that scientists have proposed in recent years, all with slightly different characteristics but collectively believed to be lurking in the Kuiper Belt — also home to Pluto, the former ninth planet that was demoted and reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006.


Pluto as seen by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, which captured this view in 2015. - NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute

The reason so many “ninth planet” candidates have emerged is that the Kuiper Belt is a dark, faraway region of the solar system and observations are difficult and incomplete. But such obstacles are likely to change, as a new telescope called the Vera C. Rubin Observatory is gearing up to start its 10-year survey of the night sky.

“I think within the first two to three years, it’ll become definitive,” Siraj said. “If Planet Y is in the field of view of the telescope, it will be able to find it directly.”
A heated debate

After the discovery of Neptune in 1846, astronomers kept searching for another solar system planet, which in the early 20th century became known as Planet X, a name popularized by astronomer Percival Lowell. He suspected that anomalies in the orbits of Neptune and Uranus were due to an undiscovered, distant body

When Pluto was discovered in 1930, astronomers proclaimed it the ninth planet, initially thinking it to be Planet X. But in the following decades, Pluto was deemed too small to account for the irregularities, and by the early 1990s, data from the Voyager 2 probe revealed that Neptune had less mass than previously thought, which explained the orbital disturbances without the need for a Planet X.

The search was revived in 2005 when three astronomers, including Mike Brown, a professor of planetary astronomy at the California Institute of Technology, discovered Eris — an icy body slightly larger than Pluto that is also orbiting the sun from the Kuiper Belt.


An artist's concept of the dwarf planet Eris and its moon Dysnomia. The sun is the small star in the distance. - NASA/JPL-Caltech

This discovery eventually led to Pluto’s much-maligned demotion from planet to dwarf planet, and in 2016 Brown and his colleague Konstantin Batygin first published research about their own hypothesis for an additional solar system planet, which they dubbed Planet Nine.

Planet Nine is believed to be between five and 10 times the mass of Earth and would be orbiting the sun far beyond Pluto, at around 550 times the distance between Earth and the sun. Scientists have hypothesized about hidden planets of different dimensions over the years, ranging from a Mars-size body to a “super Pluto.”

Siraj said that the search for Planet Nine or Y is a heated debate in astronomy. “I think it’s a very exciting discussion, and actually that was the motivation for us to investigate the issue, because of all of this debate in the literature,” he said. “I think we’re so lucky to be living at a time when these discoveries might be made.”

More in Science



Earth is getting darker and it’s changing the planet’s climate balance




The Blob Returns: Marine Heatwave Stretches 5,000 Miles Across the North Pacific


Planet Nine and Planet Y aren’t mutually exclusive, and they could both exist, he said.

Siraj’s Planet Y search started about a year ago when he was trying to find out whether the shape of the Kuiper Belt is flat. “The planets of the solar system have slight tilts up and down, but overall, they kind of almost etch out grooves on a record,” he said, referring to the orbits of the solar system’s planets being on nearly the same plane.

The expectation, he added, is that the icy bodies beyond Neptune should exhibit a similar orientation — “the tabletop should be parallel to the record,” as Siraj puts it — but they don’t.

“It was quite a surprise to find that beyond about 80 times the Earth-sun distance, the solar system suddenly appears to be tilted by about 15 degrees, and this is what sparked the Planet Y hypothesis,” Siraj said. “We started trying to come up with explanations other than a planet that could explain the tilt, but what we found is that you actually need a planet there, because if this was some feature of how the solar system formed, or if it was due to a star flying by, the warp would have gone away by now.”



An illustration of the Kuiper Belt, a region of leftover material from the Solar System's early history that resembles a thick disk and starts beyond the orbit of Neptune. - NASA

Siraj and his coauthors ran computer simulations, which included all the known planets plus a hypothetical one. They kept changing the parameters for the latter and found that previous hypotheses such as Planet Nine didn’t work for their model, and they needed a new one. “Planet Y is most likely a Mercury to Earth-mass body, approximately 100 to 200 times the Earth-sun distance, tilted at least 10 degrees relative to the other planets,” he said.

Clarity in sight

Because the Kuiper Belt is difficult to observe, astronomers rely on studying the orbits of a limited number of objects to infer the presence of a planet. In the case of Siraj’s study, that number is roughly 50, which makes the existence of Planet Y uncertain.

“With these roughly 50 objects, the statistical significance is in the 96% to 98% range,” he said. “It’s strong, but it’s not definitive yet.”

Many more such objects will be discovered once Vera Rubin starts its main mission this fall. Sitting atop a 2,682-meter-tall (8,800-feet-tall) mountain in Chile, the telescope houses the world’s largest digital camera and will image the entire sky every three days.

“It’s really quite a feat of engineering,” Siraj said. “Basically, it will allow us to view a movie of the universe, with each frame existing at a three-day cadence. This is the ideal survey for taking a census of the solar system, because we have to search the entire sky to be able to find distant objects, including additional and yet unseen planets.”

The study is an intriguing approach to probing the subtle warping of the outer solar system, said Batygin, a professor of planetary science at Caltech who has written numerous studies on Planet Nine but did not participate in the Planet Y research. “Over the coming years, the Vera Rubin Observatory will reveal the dynamical structure of the outer solar system with unprecedented clarity,” he said in an email. Once Rubin’s data comes in, astronomers should gain a much sharper picture of whether the Kuiper Belt’s tilt points to additional planets lurking far beyond Neptune.


The Vera C. Rubin Observatory in Cerro Pachon, Chile. - Vera C. Rubin Observatory/Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Siraj’s work is a careful analysis of known Kuiper Belt object orbits, looking for patterns in a slightly different way than previous studies, said Samantha Lawler, an associate professor of astronomy at the University of Regina in Saskatchewan. She also was not involved with the recent paper.

The results are interesting but certainly not definitive, Lawler said. “I don’t think that there is good evidence for a fairly large, distant planet that is supposed to be causing the clustering of distant Kuiper Belt orbits,” she said in an email, referring to the Planet Nine theory. “But I think there is promising evidence that there is a smaller body out there that is subtly warping the orbits of some very distant objects.” She agrees that the Rubin telescope will soon discover thousands of new Kuiper Belt objects and test some of these predictions.

The new study is a fascinating look at the distant Kuiper Belt, a region that remains largely unexplored, said Patryk Sofia Lykawka, an associate professor of planetary sciences at Kindai University in Japan. He also didn’t contribute to the Planet Y paper.

“The idea that a Mercury-to-Earth-class planet could be the cause of the said warping is plausible,” he said in an email.

“It adds weight to the hypothesis that there is currently an undiscovered planet lurking in the far outer solar system,” Lykawka added. “Finally, the study demonstrates that it is crucial to conduct surveys of trans-Neptunian objects, particularly in the distant Kuiper Belt, as they hold the key to a deeper understanding of how our entire solar system formed billions of years ago.”


Moon of Saturn could be suitable for life. Scientists found new evidence to confirm it

Eric Lagatta, USA TODAY
Fri, October 3, 2025 


The evidence that an ocean-covered moon orbiting around Saturn could support life just got a little stronger.

Enceladus, a small moon harboring a vast ocean beneath its icy surface, has long been considered one of our solar system's best places to search for conditions suitable for extraterrestrial life – and perhaps, even life itself.

Scientists revisiting old data from NASA's Cassini spacecraft, which ended its mission in 2017, have found organic molecules both new and old originating from the icy jets that spew saltwater into space from the surface of Enceladus.

While no life has been found on the 310-mile-wide moon, the discovery confirms that building blocks for it could be present, Nozair Khawaja, a planetary scientist at the Free University of Berlin in Germany, who led the study, said in a press release.



The multi-colored tracks of asteroids flash on and off in this image of two spiral galaxies within the Virgo Cluster. Each of these tracks represents a moving asteroid detected by NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory in its first few nights of observations.

The open star cluster Bochum 14 as imaged by NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory.

Aerial view of Vera C. Rubin Observatory located in Chile, taken Jan. 24, 2024. Surrounded by desert-like mountains and under the blue skies of northern Chile, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory will revolutionize the study of the universe when it incorporates the largest digital camera ever built in the world. (Photo by) (Photo by JAVIER TORRES/AFP via Getty Images)

Rubin Observatory stands on Cerro Pachón in Chile against a sky full of star trails in this long exposure night sky image.

Sunset at Rubin Observatory on Cerro Pachón in Chile.

NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory atop Cerro Pachón in Chile is outlined against the full Moon rising above the horizon. A trick of perspective has enlarged the Moon beyond the size we’d naturally see it on Earth. Rubin Observatory will begin science operations in late 2025.

This image captures not only Vera C. Rubin Observatory, but one of the celestial specimens Rubin Observatory will observe when it comes online: the Milky Way. The bright halo of gas and stars on the left side of the image highlights the very center of the Milky Way galaxy. The dark path that cuts through this center is known as the Great Rift, because it gives the appearance that the Milky Way has been split in half, right through its center and along its radial arms.

This image combines 678 separate images taken by NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory in just over seven hours of observing time. Combining many images in this way clearly reveals otherwise faint or invisible details, such as the clouds of gas and dust that comprise the Trifid nebula (top) and the Lagoon nebula, which are several thousand light-years away from Earth.

This image captures a small section of NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s view of the Virgo Cluster, offering a vivid glimpse of the variety in the cosmos. Visible are two prominent spiral galaxies, three merging galaxies, galaxy groups both near and distant, stars within our own Milky Way, and much more.

Made from over 1100 images captured by NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory, this image contains an immense variety of objects. This includes about 10 million galaxies, roughly .05% of the approximately 20 billion galaxies Rubin Observatory will capture in the next decade.

This image captures a small section of NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s view of the Virgo Cluster, revealing both the grand scale and the faint details of this dynamic region of the cosmos. Bright stars from our own Milky Way shine in the foreground, while a sea of distant reddish galaxies speckle the background.


Here's everything to know about Enceladus, the new discovery and the search for life beyond Earth.

What is Saturn’s moon Enceladus?


Saturn's ocean-bearing moon Enceladus taken in visible light with the Cassini spacecraft narrow-angle camera on Nov. 27, 2016.

While a few worlds in the Milky Way are believed to have liquid water hiding beneath a frozen surface, Enceladus isn't quite as secretive about its subterranean ocean.

The small, icy world is home to water-spouting geysers that spew vapor and ice particles into space – offering a tangible clue to its subsurface saltwater ocean. From samples that various spacecraft have collected, scientists have determined that Enceladus has most of the chemical ingredients required for life, according to NASA.

Though Enceladus is only about as wide as Arizona, the world is named after a giant in Greek mythology. The surface of the moon is notably smooth, white and reflective, with a surface temperature that extremely cold – about negative 330 degrees Fahrenheit.
Scientists find moon has conditions to support life

Because the planet is so cold, most of the material it spews out falls like snow back to the moon’s surface. Some of it, though, remains in space to help form Saturn's E-ring – the second outermost of Saturn's rings – which is where scientists turn to gather observations on Enceladus’ ocean.

While scientists have found evidence of organic molecules in the E-ring before, the team of researchers turned to observations made by NASA’s Cassini spacecraft in 2008 during a close flyby of Enceladus. The probe, which launched in 1997, spent years studying Saturn's icy moons before it was deliberately plunged into Saturn in 2017, ending its mission.

During the flyby, icy grains stuck to the spacecraft before they were altered by space radiation in the E-ring. Within those grains, Khawaja and his team found not just frozen water, but the same organic molecules observed in the E-ring.

Other organic molecules not previously detected were also found that, on Earth, lead to life's building blocks.




Astrophotographers capture new views of Comet C/2025 A6 (Lemmon)



Earth is getting darker and it’s changing the planet’s climate balance


The findings, the team said, strengthen the case for Enceladus being habitable – though they are not claiming to have found evidence of life itself. Rather, the researchers claim the evidence they found warrants follow-up missions to the moon to search for signs of life.

The findings were published Wednesday, Oct. 1, in the journal Nature Astronomy.
How many moons does Saturn have? Mimas also has water

Saturn's system is positively teeming with moons, where Enceladus is one of 274 natural satellites orbiting the ringed planet. A whopping 128 of those were just discovered in March 2025.

The moons range from planet-sized Titan to smaller oddities, some of which are strangely shaped like potatoes or ravioli.

In fact, Enceladus isn't even the only one potentially home to water.

In 2024, a French team of researchers found evidence of a vast liquid ocean beneath the icy exterior of Mimas. The revelation means life could possibly exist on a tiny world paradoxically nicknamed "the Death Star" – a moniker due to the crater on its surface that lends it the look of the planet-killing weapon from "Star Wars."

NASA, meanwhile, has also sent an uncrewed spacecraft to another planet's moon to hunt for signs of habitability. The Europa Clipper spacecraft is due to reach Jupiter's moon of the same name in 2030 and begin conducting flybys to observe the icy world, where water is believed to exist beneath the surface.


Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Study strengthens case that life could thrive on Saturn's moon Enceladus


Supercomputers unlock secrets of Enceladus’ icy plumes and hidden ocean
Joshua Shavit
Fri, October 3, 2025 


Saturn's icy moon Enceladus loses ice mass to space by cryovolcanic geyers, and new TACC supercomputer simulations have improved estimates of ice mass loss. (CREDIT: UT Austin)

It was in the 17th century that Christiaan Huygens and Giovanni Cassini first revealed Saturn’s stunning rings, changing the way people understood the distant planet. Hundreds of years later, NASA’s Cassini mission made a return trip to the Saturn system and came back with even more astounding results. Among them was the finding that one of Saturn’s smaller moons, Enceladus, was far from dormant.

This tiny world, just 313 miles across, shoots enormous plumes of water vapor and ice into space through cracks in its south pole. Those fountains, known as “tiger stripes,” create a thin atmosphere around the moon and supply Saturn’s faint E ring. More importantly, they provide a direct connection to an ocean beneath Enceladus’ ice shell—an environment that could, in theory, support life.

Now scientists are using cutting-edge computer simulations to find out more about how these plumes work, how much material makes it out into space, and what this can tell us about the world beneath the ice.



Arnaud Mahieux, the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy and UT Austin
. (CREDIT: UT Austin)


Simulating the Plumes

The new research was led by Aurélien Mahieux of the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy and the University of Texas at Austin. His team turned to a technique called Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC), which tracks what becomes of billions of virtual particles as they travel and collide with one another on their path upward from the vents into the vacuum of space.

“DSMC simulations are very expensive,” Mahieux explained. “We used TACC supercomputers in 2015 to obtain parameterizations to reduce computation time from 48 hours at the time to a few milliseconds now.”

The Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) provided its Lonestar6 and Stampede3 supercomputers for the researchers to simulate the plumes from the surface up to 10 kilometers in height. That’s where the gas disperses and begins to blend in with Saturn’s E ring.

What the Models Reveal

At about 10 kilometers over Enceladus, the plume is still fairly dense. By replicating conditions at that height, the team created “radial profiles” that describe how temperature, velocity, and density change with distance from the vent. The profiles are readily adaptable, enabling scientists to predict how plumes will act under various vent circumstances.


Enceladus simulations were performed on the Lonestar6 (left) and Stampede3 (right) supercomputers of the Texas Advanced Computing Center, allocated through awards by the University of Texas Research Cyber­infra­structure Portal. (CREDIT: UT Austin)More

The results showed how sensitively the plumes depend on such parameters as vent width and temperature. Wider vents produce wider plumes, and hotter vents eject gas more rapidly. Even small changes in these parameters have a dramatic effect on the density and shape of the jets.

At higher altitudes, collisions between molecules become rare. Here, the plume forms a cone shape, becoming more tenuous as it gets dispersed into space. The models matched well with features Cassini observed during its many flybys, such as the particle density distributions, giving scientists confidence in their approach.

Reverse Engineering the Vents


One of the most robust parts of the research was a “sensitivity analysis.” The south pole of Enceladus has 98 active geyser sources with slightly different sizes and output. The simulations showed that certain properties, like vent width and mass flow rate, have a particularly strong influence in regulating the plumes.

That means spacecraft measurements of plume density or velocity can be used to work backward and infer what’s happening at the vents themselves. This “inverse modeling” links Cassini’s observations to the underground processes driving the eruptions. Mahieux’s team even narrowed down likely vent temperatures and flow rates, ruling out ranges that didn’t match Cassini’s readings.


South polar view of the mean correlation of the vent parameters to the Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer E14 observation geometry, where each symbolrepresents the position of the vents reported by Porco et al. (2014), and the color code is the mean correlation value (see color bar). (CREDIT: Journal of Geophysical Research Planets)More

“Our main finding in this new research is that for 100 cryovolcanic sources, we could constrain the mass flow rates and additional parameters that were not deduced before, such as the temperature at which the material was being ejected,” Mahieux said. “It’s a big step forward in understanding what’s happening at Enceladus.”

Surprisingly, the team found that Enceladus loses 20 to 40 percent less material to space than had been previously calculated in research. These new calculations sharpen estimates of the moon’s ocean interacting with the surface and how long this activity might be sustained.

Building Tools for the Next Missions

One of the primary advantages of using Mahieux’s work is that the models are not theoretical alone—they can be turned into rapid, functional tools for mission planning. Rather than needing to conduct long, resource-draining simulations, scientists can now generate predictions in a few seconds.

This is especially important for future missions that will try to sample the plumes or even land on Enceladus. Knowing the expected density and velocity of particles, engineers can develop instruments that won’t be overwhelmed and plan safe spacecraft trajectories.

Co-author David Goldstein at UT Austin created the DSMC code called Planet in 2011. His earlier work made these advances possible. Thanks to TACC’s high-performance computers, the simulations can now handle realistic pressure and much larger areas than could be done on desktop computers.


Results of the fits of the Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer E3, E5, E7, E14, E17, E18, and the Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph solar occultation. In eachpanel, the black curve is the observation, and the blue curve is the best fit, the width of which represents the uncertainty. (CREDIT: Journal of Geophysical Research Planets)More
A Window Into Hidden Oceans

The interest in Enceladus is owed to more than its spectacular geysers. Scientists are convinced that beneath its icy crust lies an ocean of liquid water globally. The plumes offer a distinct chance to explore that ocean without needing to drill through miles of ice


“There is an ocean of liquid water under these ‘big balls of ice,'” Mahieux said, referring not only to Enceladus but also to Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune moons. “The plumes at Enceladus are a window to the conditions below.”

Future NASA or European Space Agency missions could use these models to determine where and how to sample the plumes for organic molecules, salts, or other signs of habitability. Some concepts take it even further, proposing landers that one day could explore the ocean itself.

“Supercomputers can give us answers to questions that we could not even dream of asking 10 or 15 years ago,” Mahieux said. “We can now come much closer to simulating what nature is doing.”



Comparison of the mean mass flow rates for all observations and with data from the literature. (CREDIT: Journal of Geophysical Research Planets)
Practical Implications of the Research

This research goes beyond satisfying curiosity about a distant moon. The new simulations give scientists a roadmap for studying hidden oceans in icy moons across the solar system.


By knowing how plume material disperses and expands, spacecraft designers can craft superior ships, safer flybys, and more effective sampling instruments. These enhancements could increase the likelihood of detecting chemical evidence of extraterrestrial life.

For humans, the find is a reminder that Earth may not be the only world with conditions to support life. The icy moons of gas giants are maybe the holders of one of science’s biggest questions: Are we alone?


Breaking Up Is Hard to Do, as NASA Kicks Sierra Space to the Curb

Rich Smith, The Motley Fool
Sat, October 4, 2025 


Key Points

NASA awarded Sierra Space's parent company part of a $14 billion ISS supply contract in 2016.


Nearly 10 years later, everyone on that contract but Sierra Space is doing supply runs to ISS.


Last week, NASA told Sierra Space it must test-fly Dream Chaser in 2026 or lose its contract.



"Sierra Space Corporation."


It's been a couple of years since I last had an opportunity to write about this space stock. Back in 2023, the privately held company raised $290 million in new funds to complete development of its Dream Chaser spacecraft -- and surged ahead to a $5 billion private market valuation, making Sierra Space 5X a unicorn stock


And at long last, Sierra Space is back in the news this week. But not in a good way.


Image source: Sierra Space.


Playing ketchup in space

Remember the old Heinz ketchup commercial, the one singing "an-ti-ci-pation, an-tic-i-pay-yay-shun," as the kid waited for his ketchup to pour out of the bottle.

For space investors, that's what it's felt like waiting for Sierra Space to do something interesting these last several years. It's been nearly a decade since NASA awarded Sierra Space (technically, its parent company Sierra Nevada Corp.) a role in its $14 billion CRS-2 project to send Commercial Re-Supply spacecraft to the International Space Station (ISS).

Valued at roughly $628 million per launch, and with Sierra expected to run seven of the launches, the contract felt like a windfall for Sierra Space, which was a surprise winner added to the list of two incumbent CRS-1 providers, SpaceX and Northrop Grumman (known as Orbital ATK at the time).

Through 2024, the three companies were hired to launch a total of 18 CRS missions to keep the ISS astronauts well-stocked with supplies. SpaceX would use its Dragon spacecraft for its launches, and Northrop its Cygnus supply vessel. Sierra, the new entrant to the CRS club, was chosen on the strength of the new Dream Chaser spaceplane it was designing, which was expected to start launching in 2019.

Problem is, it's 2025 today -- and Dream Chaser hasn't flown even once.

Sierra was making NASA wait


And NASA's patience with Sierra Space has finally worn thin. We had warnings that things were not looking great for Sierra back in 2022, when NASA extended its existing CRS-2 contract from the original 18 launches to 32, running through 2026. In that extension, NASA specifically named SpaceX to conduct 15 of the launches, Northrop 14, and Sierra... only three.

Last week, the space agency announced it has decided to "modify" the contract even further. And by "modify" I mean it's probably going to kick Sierra out of the contract entirely.

Admittedly, NASA put it kindlier than that: "After a thorough evaluation, NASA and Sierra Space have mutually agreed to modify the contract, as the company determined Dream Chaser development is best served by a free flight demonstration, targeted in late 2026."


That's how NASA phrased its ultimatum -- but the meaning is clear.


After 10 years of no Dream Chaser flights, NASA's tired of waiting for Sierra's phantom spacecraft. Now, NASA's telling the company it needs to either prove Dream Chaser can fly, after which NASA might permit it to fly to ISS and pay for the flights -- or else admit Dream Chaser is a mirage and let SpaceX and Northrop handle the work of resupplying the space station. In the meantime, NASA's shutting off the funding spigot to Sierra, promising to provide only "minimal support through the remainder of the development and the flight demonstration."

Furthermore, even if Sierra does get Dream Chaser to orbit by next year, "NASA is no longer obligated [to buy] a specific number of resupply missions," and only "may order Dream Chaser resupply flights to the space station" (emphasis added -- "may," not "will").
Time is running out for Sierra Space -- and for a Sierra Space IPO

You can understand NASA's frustration. ISS is due to deorbit in 2030. (NASA's even paying Elon Musk $850 million to make it so). If Sierra doesn't get Dream Chaser operational soon, there's not going to be an ISS to deliver supplies to anymore. And in any case, SpaceX and Northrop appear to have the situation well in hand, such that there's not really any need for Sierra Space's Dream Chaser spacecraft to lend a hand.

Granted, there's still the possibility Dream Chaser could be used for flights to one or more future private space stations that will eventually replace ISS. That's probably part of the reason (some) investors still hope we will see Sierra Space announce an IPO one day.



Jack Daniel’s cuts off free cattle feed to Tennessee farmers after 45 years, could destroy local town. Who's at fault?

Terry Holt is dreading the upcoming spring season.

James Havers
Sat, October 4, 2025

For 45 years, cattleman Terry Holt has started his mornings the same way — climbing into his truck, driving to the Jack Daniel’s distillery in Lynchburg, Tennessee, and loading up on the leftover mash from whiskey-making.

That slop, a thick, nutrient-rich blend of corn and grain, has been a quiet but vital link between the world’s best-selling whiskey and the local farms that surround it. For decades, it kept feed costs low, cattle healthy, and waste out of landfills.

“I’ve been at it 365 days multiplied by 45,” Holt told local outlet News Channel 5 [1]. “I don’t miss a day hauling my slop. It’s that important to me.” That daily trip will soon end. Starting next spring, Jack Daniel’s will halt its Cow Feeder Program, cutting off free or low-cost access to distillers’ grain that hundreds of local farmers depend on.

A 45-year routine comes to an abrupt stop

Jack Daniels says its waste will now be redirected to Three Rivers Energy, a renewable energy firm that will convert the material into biogas and fertilizer.

To the distillery, it’s a sustainability win — one that aligns with corporate pledges to cut emissions and reduce landfill use. Jack Daniel’s produces as much as 500,000 gallons of spent grain per day, and transforming it into energy makes environmental and business sense.

But for Holt and his neighbors, that change isn’t just inconvenient, it’s potentially catastrophic. Of the 500,000 gallons, farmers currently haul away approximately 300,000 gallons — the same 300,000 gallons planned to be reallocated to Three Rivers Energy.

Without that steady feed supply, farmers face higher costs and tighter margins at a time when drought and inflation have already cut deep.

“All I know is that’s gonna destroy us,” Holt said.

The local fallout

According to the USDA, nearly 90% of farms in Moore County are livestock operations [2]. For many, the Cow Feeder Program wasn’t a bonus, it was a backbone. The distillery’s slop was protein-rich and plentiful, allowing small farms to feed their herds without paying sky-high commercial feed prices.

Now, with feed costs already elevated nationwide, up nearly 10-20% since 2021 [3] losing this free supply will hit small operators the hardest.

Some local farmers have already begun selling off herds or listing their land. Others fear their businesses won’t survive into next year.

Holt, who once worked at Jack Daniel’s before retiring to farm full-time, says the decision feels personal. It’s like the company that built its brand on small-town Tennessee values is turning its back on its own roots.

“Jack Daniel’s grew up with the people here,” he said. “You’ve used those images to grow, and now you wanna take that image and go away with it.”

Jack Daniel’s response: sustainability first

The company, owned by Louisville-based Brown-Forman, says the move was not sudden, and not heartless. In a statement, Jack Daniel’s said it began notifying farmers about the change back in 2022 and spent “years of careful consideration” evaluating options.

They suggest they realize the change is significant. “We remain dedicated to our neighbors as we adapt to this new era.”

The company argues the shift is essential to meet global environmental goals and maintain its ability to sell whiskey internationally.

The new anaerobic digester facility built by Three Rivers Energy will help the distillery meet sustainability and emissions standards, while generating renewable energy from waste that would otherwise go unused.

Jack Daniel’s says it’s protecting its long-term future, even if that means risking connection with a local tradition that helped define the brand for decades.
A rural economy caught in the middle

The move illustrates a growing tension in rural America: corporate sustainability goals versus local survival.

From Midwestern ethanol producers to California dairies, similar transitions are unfolding as companies seek to monetize their waste or cut emissions, often displacing long-standing community relationships in the process.

And while Moore County’s economy has long revolved around the distillery, which draws tourists from around the world, that loyalty doesn’t pay the feed bill.
Can small towns still count on big brands?

Jack Daniel’s decision may be financially and environmentally sound from a corporate standpoint, but it’s left locals questioning what ‘neighborly’ means in an era of global sustainability targets.

Holt and his fellow farmers aren’t asking for handouts, just for the distillery to remember the people who helped it grow.

“I pray that what words I use today, it will touch the hearts of someone out there,” he said, “because I tell you, it will absolutely destroy our little town.”

For Moore County, this isn’t just a fight over cattle feed. It’s a lesson in what happens when a hometown success story outgrows its roots — and the people who helped it rise are left paying the price.


Panasonic opens multibillion-dollar facility size of over 80 football fields: 'When we commit to something, we're fully committed'



Alex Daniel
Fri, October 3, 2025 
TCD


Panasonic has launched what it says will be the world's largest electric vehicle battery factory in De Soto, Kansas, Inside EVs reported. It's an investment that proponents say could help change the way America powers its vehicles, homes, and cities.

At 4.7 million square feet — roughly the size of over 80 football fields (and on a site of land that could fit 225) — the $4 billion plant promises to boost clean energy and, in doing so, help cities cut costs and reduce pollution that harms human health.

Mass-producing batteries domestically helps simplify supply chains and potentially lower EV prices, which can also save money for consumers and businesses.

Battery storage also enables more efficient use of renewables like solar. Paired with home panels, the systems can reduce reliance on fossil fuels and cut utility bills. Visit TCD's solar panel guide for installation guidance.

The plant is Panasonic's second in the U.S. It built another within Tesla's Gigafactory campus in Nevada.

The factory is also the largest economic development project in the history of Kansas. Developers say it will bring 4,000 manufacturing jobs and 8,000 extra roles further down its supply chain, Inside EVs reported.

Not only that, but the news outlet reported that it "comes at a critical moment for EVs in the U.S."

Global EV demand has softened, and Tesla has seen a slowdown in sales in 2025, with second-quarter deliveries falling 13%. However, the Kansas plant is a strategic hedge. Panasonic said it plans to diversify its customer base beyond Tesla, already supplying Lucid and Mazda.

On the other hand, trade tensions with China and subsidies under the Inflation Reduction Act sparked a wave of domestic battery investment, creating thousands of new jobs and a "battery manufacturing boom", Inside EVs reported.

In July, Bloomberg reported that Panasonic's head of North American operations, Megan Myungwon Lee, sought to allay previous concerns about the Japanese company's commitment to supplying Tesla amid the sales slowdown.

"We're going to be full production this year," Lee told Bloomberg.

"When we commit to something, we're fully committed, and we want to make sure we support all the customers," Lee added. "We're not feeling the slowdown yet, and we're very bullish."


Opinion

Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson’s Conspiracy Theories Totally Wreck the Credibility That Alternative Media is Trying to Gain

Mediaite
Fri, October 3, 2025




Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson are at the forefront of alternative media, grabbing more eyeballs than ever, but also wrecking the emerging medium’s credibility with loony conspiracy theories that are easily debunked. On Spotify’s chart of top news podcasts, Carlson currently holds down the top spot, while Owens lands at number 3 – The New York Times’s The Daily, NPR, and the Wall Street Journal grab the rest of the top five spots.

As traditional media continues to shed viewers and more and more Americans, especially young people, tune into podcasts and scroll social media for their news, the likes of Owens and Carlson are shaping the discourse more than ever. Unfortunately, much of their content is utter and total nonsense, and leans into age-old stereotypes and bigotry to grab headlines and remain provocative.

The divergence between the fact-based podcasts, like The Daily and WSJ, and what Owens and Carlson are peddling on their shows has never been further apart, ensuring that Americans are living in dangerously different realities.

In the weeks since Charlie Kirk’s horrific murder, Owens has unabashedly pushed conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, claiming everything from a federal cover-up, to there being a female accomplice, to suggesting his assassination was connected to Jewish and pro-Israel forces being angry with him. Carlson, too, has been out with outlandish claim after outlandish claim, including his most recent claim that Israeli military officials were “demanding” U.S. military officials inside the Pentagon do as they say during the recent Israel-Iran conflict.

Carlson, since his days at Fox News, has long been famous for “just asking questions,” and has made claim after claim over the years that have proven not to be the case. Earlier this year, he argued that Trump bombing Iran would mean “Thousands of Americans would die. We’d lose the war that follows.”

Owens famously said in March of 2024, “ I would stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that [French First Lady] Brigitte Macron is in fact a man.” The Macrons are now suing Owens in a 22-count defamation lawsuit. Carlson, of course, declared in March of this year, “And I was like, ‘Ah, Candace Owens, I love you, but I think this is too crazy.’ And then it turns out she’s right! My mind is blown!”

Independent journalist Nathan Livignstone put together a short clip of Carlson and Owens pushing some of their recent conspiracy theories and wrote:


The Candace Owens + Tucker Carlson School of Journalism:

Step 1: Make an outrageous claim with NO PROOF

Step 2: Demand YOU disprove it



Even Carlson and Owens’s biggest fans and defenders must understand that this is all they are doing. Clearly, they tune into them for something other than facts. At their most basic level, both Owens and Carlson profit in media by offering their viewers a sense of tribal belonging – pointing out over and over again who their perceived enemies are. While their approach certainly is working for them, Owens and Carlson are doing untold damage to both the country and the credibility of alternative media.

To be fair, many on the right have already tired of Owens’s antics. The MAGA influencer known as Catturd posted on Thursday, “Candace Owens is just a few days away of blaming Charlie Kirk’s assassination on Kermit the Frog. You know I’m right – it’s coming.”

Others, however, remain willfully blind in the name of partisanship. Megyn Kelly recently defended Carlson as her friend, and refused to condemn both Carlson and Owens over their use of Kirk’s death to spread anti-Semitism and promote themselves.

“As for my decision to ‘platform’ Tucker: Too bad. Too f*cking bad,” Kelly told a podcast this week on the topic, adding, “I don’t think he’s an anti-Semite at all.

She later added, “ I think Tucker’s a very important, valuable voice in the national conversation.”

Carlson, who is also out right now with a 9/11 truther documentary, has jumped further and further off the rails in recent months – going so far as to claim he was physically attacked by a demon. RedState columnist Bonchie highlighted one of Carlson’s recent interview subjects, Elizabeth Lane, noting, “She has 3.3K followers. No one knows who she is. She’s a 9/11 truther, pro-Putin, and an antisemite. So naturally, she gets an interview on Tucker Carlson’s show. Makes sense.”

Earlier in the week, Kelly gave the game away when she said, “My fight is with the left, not these two,” making clear that whether or not she agrees with the likes of Tucker and Candace, she will defend her tribe no matter what. And in our current state of hyper-polarization, Kelly is undoubtedly doing what’s best for business; even if it comes at the expense of upholding any kind of journalistic principles.

With Owens and Carlson leading the alternative media revolution, they have turned what could have been a journalistic project to speak truth to power into an entertainment-based grift, feeding into the worst impulses of American media consumers and sowing further division and hate.

Joy Reid Has Explosive Two-Word Retort For Trump VP Vance Seconds After Hearing His Attack On Her

Like, f–k you, forever!


Mediaite
Fri, October 3, 2025




Independent media host Joy Reid had an explosive retort for Trump Vice President JD Vance seconds after learning, for the first time, of his recent attack on her as contemptuous and ungrateful to America.

Vance posted a message to Reid this week over a video clip in which she discussed her mother’s experience as an immigrant, and wrote that she should show more “gratitude”:

Joy Reid has had such a good life in this country. It’s been overwhelmingly kind and gracious to her. She is far wealthier than most. Yet she oozes with contempt.

My honest, non-trolling advice to Joy Reid is that you’d be a much happier person if you showed a little gratitude

In a Substack interview Thursday, Reid — who left the X/Twitter platform years ago — revealed that even after a full day had passed, she still hadn’t heard about the message from the vice president.

Seconds after hearing it for the first time, Reid had a two-word message of her own for the VP she went on to call a “racist a**hole”:


TOMMY CHRISTOPHER: “You’d be a much happier person if you showed a little gratitude.”

That’s him talking right to you.

JOY-ANN REID: So I will start by saying, JD Vance, since you’re paying attention to me: F–k you!

TOMMY CHRISTOPHER: Whoa!

JOY-ANN REID: And I say that on behalf of every Black woman who heard you call Kamala Devi Harris “the trash.”

You calling a woman whose mother came to this country to do cancer research and to try to cure cancer. Who lost her mother not that many years ago, whose mother is the same exact racial identity as your wife.

The fact that you would stand in front of a crowd of mainly White MAGAs and call that woman who was the vice president of the United States, the highest elected female politician, political official in our nation’s history, call her “the trash” four days before the election?

Like, f–k you, forever!

There’s nothing you could ever say that I would take as advice, friendly or otherwise. I don’t need advice from you. You need to learn how to be a decent human being and you need to apologize to Kamala Harris for what you said. So let’s start with that.

The second thing is: JD Vance, I did not say that my mother said this country was not a land of opportunity for people like us. You need go back and listen to the interview.

What I probably said, I would have to pull up the interview, but what I will say again is that my mother came to this country as an immigrant. And believed in the sales pitch of what America says that it is, that it calls itself this sort of land of opportunity.

But what happens is if you are Black, you immediately come here and it isn’t long before you are treated the same way that America treats all of its Black citizens, as second class citizens, as people who need to, quote unquote, be grateful for White people apparently giving them opportunity.

See, in your statement, you forget the part that you believe for yourself, that White people earn their opportunities, that they create opportunity, that when they get a good job or get a big house or get a good salary, it’s because they earned it.

You, because you are a racist a–hole, believe that Black people are given opportunity by White people.

So you can’t accept that my mother, who became a PhD holding college professor, earned her opportunity to be a professor.

You think that someone White gave her that opportunity or that she stole it from, or, you know, Charlie Kirk’s version is she stole from somebody White.

Watch above via the Tommy Christopher Substack interview series.

The post Joy Reid Has Explosive Two-Word Retort For Trump VP Vance Seconds After Hearing His Attack On Her first appeared on Mediaite.




Joy Reid launches profane tirade against JD Vance over veep’s advice to be grateful to the US

TWO WORDS DO NOT A TIRADE MAKE

Taylor Herzlich
Fri, October 3, 2025 





Ex-MSNBC host Joy Reid went on a profanity-laced tirade against Vice President JD Vance, dropping the F-bomb and calling the veep a “racist a–hole.”

“JD Vance, since you’re paying attention to me: F— you!” she raved during an interview published Thursday.

The rant, delivered on writer Tommy Christopher’s Substack, came after Vance took to X on Thursday morning to urge Reid to be grateful for her success.

Former MSNBC host Joy Reid (right) unleashed on Vice President JD Vance during a Substack interview. Mediaite

“Joy Reid has had such a good life in this country. It’s been overwhelmingly kind and gracious to her. She is far wealthier than most. Yet she oozes with contempt,” he wrote in a post that got more than 3 million views.

“My honest, non-trolling advice to Joy Reid is that you’d be a much happier person if you showed a little gratitude,” Vance concluded.

He was commenting on a clip of a past Reid interview in which she talked about her mother’s migration from Guyana to the US.

“My mother got the rude awakening like, ‘Oh, it’s racist here’… She was like, ‘They didn’t tell me this was the land of opportunity, but not for me,’” Reid said with a laugh.

On Thursday, she said she hadn’t “learned of JD Vance’s diss track” about her until Christopher told her – but she quickly doubled down on her response.

“I say that on behalf of every black woman who heard you call Kamala Devi Harris ‘the trash,’” Reid said, alluding to a November campaign speech by Vance.


Vice President JD Vance called out Joy Reid in a social media post Thursday morning. Xinhua/Shutterstock

She capped her lengthy diatribe by saying, “Like, f— you forever!” to the man who’s first in the line of succession for the presidency.

The former MSNBC host – who was ousted in February after more than a decade at the lefty cable news network – continued to blast Vance as she shared her take on the experience of black immigrants to the US.

“You, because you are a racist a–hole, believe that black people are given opportunity by white people,” Reid fumed.


Reid was ousted from MSNBC in February and now hosts her own podcast. Getty Images for Congressional Black Caucus Foundation

“So you can’t accept that my mother, who became a PhD-holding college professor, earned her opportunity to be a professor,” she continued.

“You think that someone white gave her that opportunity or… you know — Charlie Kirk’s version is she stole from somebody white,” Reid said, adding a dig at the young conservative activist whose assassination stunned the nation last month.


JD Vance Keeps Demanding Certain People Show 'Gratitude' — And We Bet You Know What They Have In Common

Brittany Wong
Fri, October 3, 2025 


Vice President JD Vance wants people to show more gratitude. Anna Moneymaker via Getty Images

President Donald Trump may have tasked his second-in-command JD Vance with selling the rebrand of the GOP’s tax law, but what the vice president is really concerned with is gratitude.

More specifically, he’s fixated on people who he believes are insufficiently grateful for what the United States has provided for them.

Take, for instance, former Vice President Kamala Harris. She wasn’t fit to lead the country, Vance said on the campaign trail, because she wasn’t “grateful for it.”

Vance famously clashed with Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office in February over the Ukrainian leader’s failure to grovel to Trump for all the aid the U.S. had provided Zelenskyy’s country during its ongoing war against Russia.

“Have you ever said ‘thank you’ once?” the VP said.

Months later, the vice president complained to Fox News host Will Cain that the Democratic mayoral candidate for New York City, Zohran Mamdani, wasn’t sufficiently sycophantic.

“Does Mamdani, when you hear him speak, is this a man who feels gratitude for the United States of America?” Vance asked Cain. “Is this a man who feels grateful for all of the opportunities, the incredible bounty of this country?”

Now, Vance has found a new target for insufficient gratitude: MSNBC host (and frequent Trump administration critic) Joy Reid.

On Thursday, Vance reshared a post from the account “End Wokeness” on X, featuring a video of Reid and progressive writer Ta-Nehisi Coates in conversation at Xavier College last year. In the clip, Reid spoke about how her immigrant mother came to realize that life in the U.S. would be more challenging than she initially expected.

“When my mother came from Guyana she realized it is not a land of opportunity for people like us,” she said during the talk.

In his retweet, Vance again shouted about ingratitude.

“Joy Reid has had such a good life in this country,” he wrote, “It’s been overwhelmingly kind and gracious to her. She is far wealthier than most. Yet she oozes with contempt.”

“My honest, non-trolling advice to Joy Reid is that you’d be a much happier person if you showed a little gratitude,” he concluded.


Vice President JD Vance think MSNBC host (and frequent Trump administration critic) Joy Reid needs to be more grateful for what America has provided her with. Leon Bennett/Getty Images for ESSENCE/Henry Nicholls/Getty ImagesMore

When Vance labels someone an ingrate, it’s almost always a person of color: Harris and Reid are Black women. (Asian and Black in Harris’ case.) Mamdani, a rising star in the Democratic Party, was born and raised in Kampala, Uganda, before moving to New York City with his family at the age of 7. The exception is Zelenskyy, though the Ukrainian leader is, of course, a foreigner.

The racial implications of Vance’s language aren’t lost on Efrén Pérez, a professor of political science and psychology at UCLA.

Politics: JD Vance Whines That 1 Rising Star In Democratic Party Doesn’t Have Enough ‘Gratitude’

Though Vance is far less overt than Trump ― the latter has a bad, bigoted habit of calling women of color like Harris and Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) “low IQ” ― race still factors in, Pérez said.

“I doubt that the vice president knows about the science behind this, but his singling out of POC, including foreigners, aligns neatly with a prejudiced explanation,” the professor told HuffPost. “These are flat-out racist actions and comments directed at very specific people because by highlighting them, he taps into some people’s prejudiced thinking.”

The stereotype of the “ungrateful” or “always complaining” person of color is obviously harmful. In politics, it’s used to delegitimize the struggles and valid criticisms of marginalized communities.

“It’s consistent with a highly moralistic view of non-white others in this country as ’undeserving,” Pérez said.


Now that Trump is in office a second time, Vance and his followers feel emboldened to fight politically for what they believe in, including the belief that America's minority groups have a victim complex and need to be more grateful. Alex Wong via Getty ImagesMore

Vance’s grievances tap into a greater anxiety among some white Americans, too, Pérez said: that they’re being replaced by minorities.

Up until around 2000, the average white person in the U.S. was fairly comfortable in their position as the demographic majority. They wielded most of the political power.

Politics: JD Vance Uses 1 Derogatory Word To Describe China, And People Are Disgusted

But there’s been a noticeable increase in people of color ― Blacks, Latinos, Asian-Americans and others ― reaching nearly 40% of the U.S. population. For some white Americans, anxieties about the country’s demographic shift toward a majority-minority population became more pronounced during Barack Obama’s presidency.

“For many whites, it felt like they were losing ‘their country,’ which is another way of saying, ‘Me and my group are no longer at the top of the racial pecking order in the U.S,’” Pérez said. “This explains the types of white backlash that facilitated Donald Trump’s rise in 2016 and 2024.”


Now that Trump is in office a second time, Vance and his followers feel seasoned and emboldened to fight politically for what they believe in, including the belief that America’s minority groups have a victim complex and need to be more grateful. (It’s ironic that they do so while relying heavily on white grievance, aimed at mobilizing white voters who now perceive themselves to be “last place” in the racial status hierarchy.)

The fact that Vance rarely, if ever, has directed such “you’re not grateful enough” criticism to white Americans is very telling, Pérez said.

There’s some American exceptionalism at play here, too, said Todd Belt, professor and political management program director at the Graduate School of Political Management at George Washington University.

There’s a strand of foreign policy conservatism that has long been associated with the idea that the United States is exceptional and beyond reproach. In their eyes, the U.S. is the world’s peacekeeper, and others have for too long taken advantage of that, Belt said.

Vance famously clashed with Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office in February over the Ukranian leader’s failure to say “thank you” to President Trump for the aid the U.S. provided Zelenskyy's country during its ongoing war against Russia. “Have you ever said ‘thank you’ once?” the VP said. Andrew Harnik via Getty ImagesMore

“According to this line of thought, the U.S. spends so much more money than any other nation on defense and foreign aid, and others are freeloading off the U.S.’s generosity,”″ Belt said.

That makes sense when leveled at Zelenskyy, but the fact that Vance is using it domestically ― directing the criticism toward fellow Americans ― is something new. Although subtle, Vance’s repeated use of the trope can be viewed as another way of othering non-white Americans.

Given all that immigrants have done for this country, maybe it’s Vance who needs to extend a “thank you,” said Shaun Harper, a professor of public policy, business and education at the University of Southern California.

Pope Leo, after Trump critique, urges Catholics to help immigrants

By Joshua McElwee
Sun, October 5, 2025 


Faithful attend Mass for the Jubilee of the Missionary World and Jubilee of Migrants led by Pope Leo XIV in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, October 5, 2025. REUTERS/Remo Casilli

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) -Pope Leo urged the world's 1.4 billion Catholics on Sunday to care for immigrants, pressing ahead with a message of welcome for migrants days after criticizing U.S. President Donald Trump's hard-line anti-immigration policies.

Leo, the first U.S. pope, told thousands of pilgrims celebrating Mass in St. Peter's Square that immigrants should not be treated with "the coldness of indifference or the stigma of discrimination".

The pope, who did not single out any country for its treatment of migrants, called on Catholics to "open our arms and hearts to them, welcoming them as brothers and sisters, and being for them a presence of consolation and hope."

POPE TALKS OF 'NEW MISSIONARY AGE'

Leo had criticized the Trump administration's immigration policies on September 30, questioning whether they were in line with the Catholic Church's pro-life teachings, in comments that drew heated backlash from some prominent conservative Catholics.

On Sunday, the pope said the global Church was experiencing "a new missionary age" in which it was tasked with offering "hospitality and welcome, compassion and solidarity" to migrants fleeing violence or searching for a safe place to live.

"In the communities of ancient Christian tradition, such as those of the West, the presence of many brothers and sisters from the world's South should be welcomed as an opportunity, through an exchange that renews the face of the Church," he said.

Elected in May to replace the late Pope Francis, Leo has shown a much more reserved style than his predecessor, who frequently criticized the Trump administration and often spoke in surprise, off-the-cuff remarks.

Leo spoke on Sunday from a prepared text. He was addressing a weekend event during the Catholic Church's ongoing holy year that was specially organised for migrants, which the Vatican said had attracted more than 10,000 pilgrims from some 95 countries.

(Reporting by Joshua McElwee; Editing by David Holmes)


Pope Leo XIV calls for solidarity with and compassion for migrants

DPA
Sun, October 5, 2025



Pope Leo XIV attends his weekly general audience at St Peter's square in The Vatican. Evandro Inetti/ZUMA Press Wire/dpa

With compelling words, Pope Leo XIV has reminded the faithful of the plight of migrants and condemned indifference towards them.

In a speech in St Peter's Square in the Vatican on Sunday, the pontiff recalled the suffering of many people who flee violence and risk their lives on dangerous routes. Their "cry of pain and despair" must not meet "the coldness of indifference or the stigma of discrimination," he said.

He said that it is important to meet migrants with open arms and hearts and to give them comfort and hope, during an event marking the Church's Jubilee Year.

The boundaries of need are no longer merely geographical in nature, he said. Poverty, suffering and the search for hope have now reached the heart of societies, he further stated, adding that the fate of migrants bears witness to this.

Criticism of treatment of migrants in US

Leo has been at the helm of the world's 1.4 billion Catholics since May as the first pope from the United States.

It is not yet entirely clear what political course he is pursuing in the Church. However, like his predecessor, the late Francis who died in April, Leo is deeply concerned about the fate of immigrants.

Recently, he has criticized the treatment of migrants by the US more sharply than before. He expressed doubts about whether this aligns with the Catholic Church's position on the protection of life.

"Someone who says that 'I'm against abortion, but I’m in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States,' I don't know if that's pro-life," said the pontiff.

The White House rejected the criticism shortly afterwards.

Pope Leo to release first document, on world's poor, on Oct 9

By Joshua McElwee
Sat, October 4, 2025


Pope Leo speaks during a three-day international conference "Raising Hope for Climate Justice" in Castel Gandolfo, near Rome, Italy, October 1, 2025. REUTERS/Yara Nardi

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) -Pope Leo will publish the first document of his tenure on October 9, the Vatican said on Saturday, with a text that is likely to offer hints about the new pontiff's priorities for the 1.4-billion-member Catholic Church.

The document, known as an apostolic exhortation, will take the name "Dilexi te" (He loved you), and was formally signed by the pope on Saturday ahead of its publication, the Vatican said.

Several Vatican officials told Reuters in recent weeks that Leo's text will focus primarily on the needs of the world's poor.

The Vatican did not give details about the document on Saturday but the title suggests Leo wants to signal continuity with the late Pope Francis, whose last major document, an encyclical, was issued in October 2024 with the name "Dilexit nos" (He loved us).

Leo's document completes a writing project first started by Francis but left uncompleted before the pontiff's death in April, after 12 years leading the global Church, said the officials.

Leo, the first U.S. pope, was elected to replace Francis by the world's cardinals on May 8.

Leo formally signed the text on Saturday, the Catholic feast day celebrating St. Francis of Assisi, the 13th century Italian saint renowned for his vow of poverty and closeness to nature.

Pope Francis, the first pontiff to take the saint's name, shunned many of the trappings of the papacy. He often hosted meals with Rome's homeless population and frequently criticised the global market system as not caring for society's most vulnerable people.

Francis' last encyclical, "Dilexit nos," took a different approach from many of his other writings, largely abstaining from talking about political issues and focusing on spiritual themes.

In that text, Francis urged the world's Catholics to abandon the "mad pursuit" of money and instead devote themselves to their faith.

(Reporting by Joshua McElwee; Editing by Alvise Armellini and Susan Fenton)


Why are American conservatives clashing with Pope Leo?

Joel Mathis, The Week US
Fri, October 3, 2025 



Leo has made it clear he isn’t ‘interested in joining anyone’s team’. | Credit: Illustration by Stephen Kelly / Getty Images / Shutterstock

Pope Leo XIV enjoyed rapturous support from his fellow American Catholics when he was elevated last spring, but his latest comments on abortion and immigration are revealing a rift with conservatives in the church.

Leo alienated conservatives this week when asked about the backlash to an award planned for Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a pro-choice Catholic, said The Associated Press. (Durbin later declined the award.) A politician “who says I am against abortion but I am in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don’t know if that’s pro-life,” the pope told reporters. Similarly, he said that politicians who favor the death penalty are “not really pro-life.”

That apparent knock on President Donald Trump’s immigration policies — and seeming defense of a pro-choice politician — suggests Leo’s “honeymoon with conservatives” has come to an end, said Reuters. Leo is creating “confusion” about the “moral clarity of the Church’s teaching,” said former Bishop Joseph Strickland, a conservative Texan who was ousted from his post by the late Pope Francis. Catholic conservative influencers such as Matt Walsh and Jack Posobiec also joined the criticism. The controversy could “detract” from Leo’s mission to “work for unity” in an increasingly polarized Catholic Church, said Reuters.

‘Morally obtuse’


“Conservatives and traditionalists are going to wince” at Leo’s comments, Michael Brendan Dougherty said at National Review. Leo’s statement was a “weird slur” on Catholics who favor immigration control, “which can be executed humanely or inhumanely.” And where the death penalty is concerned, comparing “aborted children to hardened criminals is morally obtuse.”

Leo made the mistake of “emulating Christ,” Charlotte Clymer said on Substack. The conservative “pro-life” position has often seemed to embrace “only one aspect of the sanctity of life.” They are “laser-focused on abortion” while ignoring a pro-life sensibility when it comes to “immigration, homelessness, mental health” and other issues. The truth is that religious conservatives “cannot reconcile their chosen hierarchy of life with the teachings of Christ.”

The new pope has “shown little interest in wading into the culture wars” that consume American Catholicism, Molly Olmstead said at Slate. Conservatives hoped they had “found a new and powerful ally in Rome” following Francis’ papacy. Leo has instead made clear “he wasn’t interested in joining anyone’s team.”

‘Our teaching is very clear’

Leo’s comments were the “clearest, substantive evidence that his papacy will be in profound continuity with Pope Francis,” Michael Sean Winters said at National Catholic Reporter. The new pope has “obvious” differences with his predecessor where style and personality are concerned but “not so much” where the substance of Catholic teaching is concerned. That means there should be no worries about “confusion” on the church’s pro-life stance: Leo is pro-life but does not side with those who believe “abortion is really the only preeminent issue” that Catholics should weigh. “Is there anyone on the planet who does not know what the church teaches about abortion? Our teaching is very clear.”


Pope Leo faces MAGA ire after immigration and climate change remarks

Analysis by Christopher Lamb, CNN
Sat, October 4, 2025 


Pope Leo XIV waves to pilgrims at the end of the Weekly General Audience at the Vatican on October 1, 2025. - Filippo Monteforte/AFP/Getty Images

Pope Leo XIV has adopted a more low-key, less combative style to his predecessor in the early months of his papacy. Pope Francis’s openness to the LGBTQ community, advocacy for migrants and critiques of unrestrained capitalism saw him run up against strong conservative opposition inside and outside the church.

Leo, after gently dipping his toe into the US political fray, is now facing criticism from similar quarters to Francis. The opposition is coming from conservative Catholics in the US and MAGA supporters, some of whom, after Leo’s election, had hoped he would take the church in a different direction from Pope Francis.

The first American pope was asked on Tuesday about plans by the cardinal in Leo’s home city of Chicago to give an award to Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, a member of Senate Democratic leadership. Cardinal Blase Cupich, an ally and friend of the pope, was planning to give Durbin a “Lifetime Achievement Award for support to immigrants,” but the move faced a backlash given Durbin’s support for abortion rights. Durbin decided to refuse the honor

Unusually, around 10 US bishops even spoke out publicly against the award. Two of those who did – Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone and Bishop Thomas Paprocki – were both appointed a religious liberty advisory body by US President Donald Trump and had been at odds with decisions made by Francis.

Rather than condemn the award, Leo said it was important to look at Durbin’s “40 years of service in the United States Senate.” The pope then said that it’s “not really pro-life” to oppose abortion and support the death penalty, while also questioning whether it was “pro-life” to support the “inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States.”

Leo’s comments were immediately criticized. One conservative Catholic described it as “disappointing” and “largely irrelevant”, right-wing political commentator Matt Walsh said it was a “terrible answer from Pope Leo” and Jack Posobiec, an influencer who is supportive of Trump, posted on X simply: “Some popes are a blessing. Some popes are a penance.” Joseph Strickland, the outspoken retired bishop of Tyler, Texas, said Leo’s remarks had created “much confusion”.



Pope Leo XIV attends the International Conference "Raising Hope for Climate Justice" on the occasion of the 10th Anniversary of the Encyclical Laudato Si' at Mariapolis Center in Castel Gandolfo on October 01, 2025. ( - Tiziana Fabi/AFP/Getty ImagesMore

The day after, however, Leo generated more MAGA opposition when he took part in climate conference where he called for action on protecting the planet and blessed some ice. It all comes during a period when Leo had a private meeting with Reverend James Martin, a leading advocate for LGBTQ Catholics, spoke up against the “pandemic of arms” following the Minnesota school shooting and criticised huge CEO salaries and singling out Elon Musk

Is the Chicago-born pontiff positioning his papacy as a counterbalance to the Trump administration? Along with his comments about abortion and immigration, he described Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s recent speech to generals as “worrying”.

Elise Ann Allen, who recently interviewed Leo for her biography of the pope for her book “Leo XIV: Citizen of the World, Missionary of the XXI Century,” said Leo does not want to be “anti-Trump”.

“He’s open to helping and dialoguing with him. He wants to be an interlocutor,” she told CNN. “His remarks are aimed at Catholics and what he’s saying is there is a ‘consistent life ethic’. Yes, abortion is wrong but being pro-life respects human dignity in all its forms, whether it concerns the death penalty or immigrants. Being from the United States, Leo is aware that the term ‘pro-life’ is often pigeon-holed into abortion.”

For some Catholics abortion is the “pre-eminent” issue, while they question Francis’ decision to update church teaching and make the death penalty “inadmissible.”

Francis’ critics hoped that Leo’s distinct style – such as his decision to wear the red mozzetta cape after his election – might signal a course correction.

“Conservative Catholics had hoped that Pope Francis’ reforms would follow him into the tomb, that the universal church would view his papacy the way they did, as a bit of bad weather that had finally and thankfully passed,” Michael Sean Winters, a Catholic commentator, wrote in the National Catholic Reporter.

This week they were disappointed. Leo has shown he will, like Francis, try and avoid the culture wars. He doesn’t want to fuel any polarization. “They are very complex issues, and I don’t know if anyone has all the truth on them,” the Pope pointed out when asked about Durbin’s award. Leo will also speak up, when necessary, particularly on the treatment of immigrants, an issue close to his heart from his time as a bishop in Peru. While Leo’s aim is to be a peacemaker his intervention this week show he’s unafraid to face opposition when drawing lines on where the church stands.

Cofounder of Roomba Maker Says Elon Musk Is in for a Terrible Surprise With Humanoid Robots

Victor Tangermann
Fri, October 3, 2025 



Tesla CEO Elon Musk has bet his EV maker on selling millions of humanoid robots, prognosticating earlier this month that the initiative could eventually make up a whopping 80 percent of Tesla’s value.

He’s promised that the company’s Optimus robot could generate over $10 trillion in revenue in the long term, orders of magnitude more than the amount of money the carmaker made last year.

If Musk is to be believed, the robot could lift the company’s market cap from just over $1 trillion to $25 trillion — by some unspecified date, at least.

But not everybody’s convinced that pouring billions of dollars into bipedal androids designed to do the dishes or fold laundry makes sense.

In a recent blog post, first spotted by Fortune, Rodney Brooks, the cofounder of Roomba vacuum maker iRobot, argued that Musk’s vision of an Optimus robot-filled future is “pure fantasy thinking.”

“Today’s humanoid robots will not learn how to be dexterous despite the hundreds of millions, or perhaps many billions of dollars being donated by VCs and major tech companies to pay for their training,” he wrote.

Instead, he argued, “we will have plenty of humanoid robots fifteen years from now, but they will look like neither today’s humanoid robots nor humans.”

Brooks pointed to the difficulty of simulating human touch, rather than just limb dexterity, in robots. Despite “many hands modeled on human hands, with articulated fingers” having been built over the “last few decades,” human-like dexterity has remained tricky.

While the current crop of robot companies are using machine learning to physically teach humanoid robots new tricks, “we do not have such a tradition for touch data,” Brooks argued.

“To think we can teach dexterity to a machine without understanding what components make up touch, without being able to measure touch sensations, and without being able to store and replay touch is probably dumb,” he wrote. “And an expensive mistake.”

Indeed, as The Information reported in July, Tesla has been struggling with technical problems related to Optimus’ hands, causing production to fall far behind Musk’s lofty goal of producing 5,000 Optimus robots this year.

Complicating matters is a massive surge in competition. In the US, AI robotics company Figure has made major strides with its Figure 02 robot, demonstrating a wide variety of skills, from loading dishwashers to sorting packages at a logistics warehouse.

In China, robotics company Unitree has made major strides in making humanoid robots more affordable, with its G1 starting at a mere $16,000.

But whether focusing on robots that resemble the human form even makes sense in the first place remains to be seen, according to Brooks. Legs will also end up being a costly distraction, he argued.

“Before too long (and we already start to see this) humanoid robots will get wheels for feet, at first two, and later maybe more, with nothing that any longer really resembles human legs in gross form,” Brooks wrote. “But they will still be called humanoid robots.”

“There will be many, many robots with different forms for different specialized jobs that humans can do,” he concluded. “And a lot of money will have disappeared, spent on trying to squeeze performance, any performance, from today’s humanoid robots.”

“But those robots will be long gone and mostly conveniently forgotten,” Brooks wrote.

Tesla and xAI Staff Are Fleeing as Musk Becomes Increasingly Erratic

Frank Landymore
Sat, October 4, 2025 
FUTURISM

Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Kevin Diestch / Getty Images

As Elon Musk continues to unravel on the world stage, so does his business empire — at least if employee churn is any indication. At Tesla and xAI, the Financial Times reports, the centibillionaire’s ruthless demands, chaotic decision-making, and deteriorating public image are driving away senior leaders and rank and file talent, many of whom are fleeing to Musk’s biggest rivals.

“The one constant in Elon’s world is how quickly he burns through deputies,” a Musk adviser told the paper. “Even the board jokes, there’s time and then there’s ‘Tesla time.’ It’s a 24/7 campaign-style work ethos. Not everyone is cut out for that.”

Many executives leave of their own accord. Most notably, Linda Yaccarino stepped down as CEO of X in July, shortly after the site’s AI chatbot Grok had a legendary meltdown that saw it praise Nazis and call itself “MechaHitler.” Behind the scenes, reports suggest Yaccarino had grown fed up with Musk slowly icing her out from making decisions and undermining her attempts to resuscitate the platform’s ad revenue that had tanked after he took it over when it was still called Twitter.

But she’s far from alone. Mike Liberatore served as chief financial officer at xAI, Musk’s AI firm that now also operates X after the two merged, for just three months. He left for OpenAI — run by Musk’s arch-nemesis Sam Altman — claiming he’d been working more than 120 hours per week. xAI’s general counsel Robert Keele quit after 16 months in August, lamenting in a tweet: “I love my two toddlers and I don’t get to see them enough.”

Not even the company’s own cofounder, Igor Babuschkin, wanted to stick around. In August, he left to launch his own VC firm focused on funding AI safety research.

Per the FT, X also lost two communications executives who quit to rejoin their old employers, and a host of senior engineers. Some of these engineers fled to OpenAI.

So many of Musk’s quondam underlings have defected to OpenAI, in fact, that Musk recently sued the ChatGPT maker for allegedly running a scheme that deliberately targets his employees in order to gain access to his company’s trade secrets — something that reeks of jealousy that Musk’s friend-turned-foe Altman is leading the darling of the AI industry.

“Elon’s got a chip on his shoulder from ChatGPT and is spending every waking moment trying to put Sam out of business,” one recent top departee told the FT.

How Musk treats his longtime employees does little to instill loyalty in the ranks. Last month, he ruthlessly fired 500 xAI employees on Grok’s data annotation team and replaced a veteran manager who followed him from Tesla after working there for for over a decade with a kid in college.

This summer, Musk also fired a longtime close confidant, Omead Afshar, who served as Tesla’s head of sales and operations in North America. The personnel change came amid plunging sales at the EV automaker. Arguably, Afshar was singled out unfairly; it was clear that Musk’s controversial personal behavior and politics — ranging from backing Donald Trump’s reelection campaign, gutting the federal government through DOGE, and performing a series of Nazi salutes in public — were tanking his brand’s image and driving its historically liberal customers away.


“I love Tesla and my time there,” another former worker told the FT. “But nobody that I know there isn’t thinking about politics. Who the hell wants to put up with it?”

Tangled up in that political sentiment, many employees are becoming dispirited at what they perceive as Musk abandoning the company’s original eco-conscious vision in favor of robotaxis and AI. Giorgio Balestrieri, an engineer who worked for Tesla’s energy division for eight years, lambasted Musk in a searing LinkedIn post after quitting the company, accusing him of dealing “huge damage to Tesla’s mission” and working with an administration that is “slowing down the energy transition.”

Last year, Musk tossed out plans to build an affordable, $25,000 EV that fans had long anticipated, and that many at the company saw as essential to driving up sales and further spearheading a transition to clean electric cars. After that move, several top brass left Tesla, and its director of vehicle programs Daniel Ho quit and joined its competitor Waymo. The head of Tesla’s supercharger division Rebecca Tinucci left for Uber, after Musk laid off her entire team.

“Elon’s behavior is affecting morale, retention, and recruitment,” a long-time Musk lieutenant told the FT. Musk “went from a position from where people of all stripes liked him, to only a certain section.”

More on Elon Musk: New Evidence Links Elon Musk to Epstein’s Island
Elon Musk Caught Letting China Invest in SpaceX, a Huge US Military Contractor

Victor Tangermann
Sat, October 4, 2025 
FUTURISM

Newly unveiled testimony has revealed that Elon Musk's SpaceX took money directly from Chinese investors, despite US military ties.

Newly unveiled testimony has revealed that Elon Musk’s SpaceX took money directly from Chinese investors, despite its extremely close ties to the United States military.

As ProPublica reports, major SpaceX investor Iqbaljit Kahlon said during a 2024 deposition that “they obviously have Chinese investors to be honest.”

He said that some of these investors are directly listed as shareholders, highlighting SpaceX’s strong ties to one of the United States’ most prominent international adversaries, and raising concerns that the firm could expose the country to foreign espionage.

The news comes after ProPublica previously reported in March that SpaceX allows Chinese investors to buy a stake in the company — as long as funds are “routed through the Cayman Islands or other offshore secrecy hubs.”

The reporting suggested that SpaceX was trying to avoid scrutiny of its ties to China. Case in point, the company canceled a 2021 deal worth $50 million with a Chinese firm when plans became public, according to ProPublica‘s reporting.

Following the March reporting, Democrats sent a letter to secretary of defense Pete Hegseth and NASA, expressing “concerns about perceived and actual conflicts of interest” surrounding SpaceX.

The “testimony, which arose during a corporate lawsuit in Delaware, suggests that SpaceX may be reluctant to publicly disclose the full extent of Chinese investment into the company’s privately held ownership structure,” the letter reads. “In light of the extreme sensitivity of SpaceX’s work for DoD and NASA, this lack of transparency raises serious questions.”

SpaceX has long been an extremely important military contractor to the Department of Defense, including multimillion-dollar spy and weather satellite launch contracts.

As Ars Technica reported earlier this year, Elon Musk’s space company has been at the receiving end of nearly all recent military launch contracts.

SpaceX was awarded seven Space Force and National Reconnaissance Office launch contracts this year, worth a combined $845.8 million, per Ars. Its competitor, the United Launch Alliance, was awarded only two Space Force launch contracts.

Musk has personally maintained a “kind of pro-China” stance, developing important relationships with the nation for his EV maker, Tesla.

On the other hand, the Trump administration has staunchly opposed Chinese influence, igniting a trade war with the country earlier this year.

The Trump administration has also aimed its sights at China’s tech industry, recently expanding restrictions on it.

However, given SpaceX’s strong ties to China, Elon Musk’s firm could be opening up the US military to significant risks of foreign interference, a topic that’s likely to continue being a major point of contention in Washington, DC.

During a February House subcommittee meeting, New Jersey Democrat LaMonica McIver accused Musk of being China’s “top puppet,” as quoted by the South China Morning Post.

If House members were really concerned, they “would not be OK with handing their constituents’ information over to an unelected billionaire whose true intentions are unknown,” she added at the time.
Elon Musk, the Anti-Defamation League and the right: what’s behind the latest blow-up?

Nick Robins-Early
Sat, October 4, 2025 
THE GUARDIAN


Elon Musk attends a memorial service for slain far-right commentator Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium, in Glendale, Arizona, on 21 September 2025.Photograph: Daniel Cole/Reuters

The Anti-Defamation League, one of the most prominent Jewish advocacy and anti-hate organizations in the US, has been the center of a rightwing pressure campaign that intensified on Wednesday when the FBI director, Kash Patel, denounced the group and said the agency would cut ties with the non-profit.

Patel’s announcement followed days of attacks by rightwing influencers and Elon Musk on the ADL over its online database on extremism, which included a page on slain far-right pundit Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA and the organization’s links to far-right extremists. On Tuesday, the ADL deleted its entire Glossary of Extremism, a flagship project which contained more than 1,000 entries on groups and movements with connections to hateful ideologies. The move failed to quell the backlash.

The fury against the ADL this week has placed the 112-year-old organization in a difficult position. It has faced years of internal turmoil as well as accusations it has attempted to appease the Trump administration and Musk at the expense of its core values. Now it finds itself targeted by some of the same conservative powers it once praised.

How did the ADL backlash begin?


Over the weekend, several influential rightwing accounts began posting screenshots of the ADL’s page on Turning Point USA (TPUSA), attacking the organization for including Kirk’s group in its Glossary of Extremism. One of the first posts, from a self-described “Twitter troll”, accused the ADL of having “blood on their hands”.

The ADL did not actually list TPUSA as an extremist organization, but instead documented incidents where its leadership and affiliated activists had either aligned with extremists or made “racist or bigoted comments”. Other rightwing activists soon followed the troll with more posts about the ADL. Some spread a screenshot of the ADL’s page on the Christian Identity movement – an extremist ideology that espouses a racial holy war against Jews and other minorities – to allege that the ADL was biased against Christians as a whole.

The online campaign against the ADL gained more momentum and exposure on Sunday night after Musk, who owns X and boasts over 220 million followers on the platform, began responding to posts about the non-profit and joining in on the attacks.

“The ADL hates Christians, therefore it is is [sic] a hate group,” Musk responded on Sunday night to an X account that usually tweets anti-immigrant content. In another post, Musk suggested that the ADL’s operations encouraged murder.

After days of rightwing outrage – that included Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican congresswoman – accusing the ADL of “creating a targeted hate campaign against Christians”, the organization announced on Tuesday that it had eliminated its entire glossary of extremism from its website – a database it touted in 2022 as “the most comprehensive and intuitive resource on extremist speech currently available to the public”. The ADL framed the decision to delete as a way to “explore new strategies and creative approaches to deliver our data and present our research more effectively”.

The ADL has weathered similar pressure campaigns from rightwing activists in the past, including from Chaya Raichik of the influential Libs of TikTok account in 2023, though these campaigns did not result in drastic deletion.

Failure to halt the backlash


Despite the ADL’s apparent capitulation to Musk and others, the rightwing campaign against the group continued. Less than 24-hours later, Kash Patel, the FBI director, posted on X that his agency would end its partnership with the ADL, accused the organization of spying on conservative groups, and denounced former FBI director James Comey’s praise of the group. The ADL had long partnered with law enforcement to hold workshops on antisemitism, conduct Holocaust education and provide information on extremist groups.

“James Comey wrote ‘love letters’ to the ADL and embedded FBI agents with them – a group that ran disgraceful ops spying on Americans,” Patel posted on X. “That era is OVER. This FBI won’t partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs”.

The ADL hasn’t received any formal communications from the Trump administration about its relationship with the FBI and is working to learn more, the organization said in a press release on Thursday.

“ADL has deep respect for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and law enforcement officers at all levels across the country who work tirelessly every single day to protect all Americans regardless of their ancestry, religion, ethnicity, faith, political affiliation or any other point of difference,” the press release reads.

The campaign against the ADL has taken place against the backdrop of a conservative movement that has sought to punish people and organizations that have been critical of Kirk. Conservative activists have claimed to have targeted tens of thousands of people who have allegedly criticized Kirk or celebrated the activist’s death, with one group proclaiming: “We will reshape the rank-and-file of America’s institutions.”

After the ADL removed its glossary of extremism, Musk and other right wing influencers began shifting their focus to the Southern Poverty Law Center – another prominent civil rights and anti-extremism organization. Musk called for the SPLC, which also documented Kirk’s group’s links to far-right extremism, an “evil organization” that “needs to be shut down”.

Didn’t the ADL defend Elon Musk?

Musk’s assault on the ADL this week is part of a longstanding, fraught relationship between the tech billionaire and the non-profit. The ADL has at times criticized Musk and his companies for incidents such as his Grok chatbot promoting pro-Nazi ideology and calling itself “MechaHitler”; however, it also defended Musk when he faced allegations of antisemitism.

Jonathan Greenblatt, ADL’s CEO, praised Musk in 2023 for saying he would block use of the pro-Palestinian slogan “from the river to the sea” on X. Only days before, though, Musk had endorsed an antisemitic conspiracy theory on X that claimed Jewish communities pushed hatred against white people. Greenblatt’s praise caused an uproar within the organization, and one of its top executives resigned after the incident.

The ADL went to bat for Musk once again earlier this year, after Jewish lawmakers and civil society groups condemned what they described as Musk’s fascist-style salutes on stage during a speech after Trump’s re-election. The ADL posted: “It seems that Elon Musk made an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute.”

Carrying water for Musk yet again led to further turmoil within the organization, with New York Magazine reporting that confused staffers had flooded the group’s Slack channels with messages and longtime liberal donors had rescinded promised gifts.

Musk has not publicly returned the praise. His clash this week is the most extreme episode in a longstanding feud that has included him amplifying calls to disband the organization and threatening to sue it over its work documenting the rise of antisemitism on X – something he claimed led to lost advertising revenue for the platform.
A turning point for the ADL

While the ADL has been cast into the spotlight on X this week, it has been a tumultuous few years in general for the organization. In addition to internal criticism over its defense of Musk, staffers and other extremism researchers have accused the group of prioritizing pro-Israel policies above a broader commitment to protecting civil rights and fighting antisemitism.


At least 17 staffers, donors and other affiliates of the organization have quit or otherwise parted ways in recent years as the organization’s priorities have shifted, according to New York Magazine. Yet the ADL remains one of the most well-resourced and influential civil society groups in the US, with around $163m in revenue last year alone.

Much of the controversy has focused on Greenblatt, who has publicly backed the Trump administration’s clampdown on pro-Palestinian speech and campus protests. Greenblatt praised Trump last year for withholding $400m in grants to Columbia University after campus protests and the ADL complimented Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s illegal arrest of pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil.

“We appreciate the Trump Administration’s broad, bold set of efforts to counter campus antisemitism – and this action further illustrates that resolve by holding alleged perpetrators responsible for their actions,” the ADL posted above a tweet about Khalil’s arrest.

The incident reflected a concern from some staffers and other Jewish organizations that the ADL has undermined its legitimacy as it sought to collaborate with the administration, with former ADL extremism researcher Vegas Tenold writing at the time: “By carrying the administration’s water, the ADL lends its voice and credibility to Trump’s efforts to dehumanize and criminalize dissent.”


Advertisement


The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.

If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.

Secure Messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.

If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.

SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post

If you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.