Tuesday, October 07, 2025

 

Panama Canal may face frequent extreme water lows in coming decades



A new study found historic droughts could become common for Gatún Lake, the main source of water for the Panama Canal locks



American Geophysical Union





WASHINGTON — In 2023, Panama experienced one of the worst droughts in its recorded history, and it severely depleted water available to the Panama Canal, so much that it decreased shipping by 30%. A new study projected that those historic water lows could become the new norm if greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise.

“If we mitigate emissions and we choose one of the lower emissions pathways, then it really keeps this system pretty stable,” said Samuel Muñoz, lead author of the a new study and a researcher studying  hydrologic and climatic variability at Northeastern University. “But if we don't, then these low water levels that are really disruptive now become the norm by the end of the century.”

The canal works by pulling water from freshwater sources such as Gatún Lake, a large man-made lake that also provides drinking water to thousands of residents in nearby Panama City and Colón.

The water is pulled into the canal to raise and lower water levels in locks which allows heavy boats to pass through Panama to move between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. More than 26 million gallons of water is needed to fill the locks for ships to pass through.

In January 2024, the Woodwell Climate Research Center reported water levels in Gatún Lake, the main lake that feeds the Panama Canal locks, were lower than ever previously recorded. The lake was nearly 2 meters (6 feet) lower than it was just one year prior. This meant Panama Canal Authorities reduced how many ships could move through the canal from 38 to as low as 22 per day and the ship’s cargo needed to be lower in weight. 

Muñoz built a model to predict how water levels could change in the next 75 years in different greenhouse gas emissions pathways.

The study was published in Geophysical Research Letters, AGU’s journal for high-impact, short-format reports with immediate implications spanning all Earth and space sciences. 

The different scenarios looked at how increased greenhouse gases would change variables like temperature, evaporation, rainfall and other factors that shift with climate change. The scenarios ranged from strong mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions to the current trending levels to extreme and worsening scenarios of emissions.

Drying of the canal

The model used projected evaporation and precipitation in different greenhouse gas emission scenarios to make its predictions and was compared to historical data to confirm its accuracy. It considered changes in water levels from rain and evaporation over the Gatun Lake watershed.

The study found that the occurrence of historic droughts, like those experienced in the last few years, will double by the end of the century under high emissions pathways.

The biggest contributor to projected droughts were decreases in rain during Panama’s wet season, particularly as drought compounded over months and years. Higher emissions were associated with increased evaporation and a decrease in rain across all months; however May through August saw the highest decrease of 50 mm (2 in) rain per month.

In scenarios where emissions undergo more aggressive mitigation, water levels in the Gatún Lake looked as they have for the last century, with only slight decreases. If greenhouse gases continue to rise, however, droughts like the one in 2023 will become commonplace.

Right now, Muñoz said we are at a crossroads where the world can mitigate emissions that would stabilize Gatún Lake water levels. But if we head down a pathway of less mitigation, the Panama Canal will continue to face operational challenges in the coming decades. Canal authorities are already improving water use efficiency and beginning the development of a new reservoir to adapt to a potentially drier future.

Muñoz hopes to expand his study to include different operational decisions and scenarios, and to reduce uncertainties in climate model predictions for Panama. He expressed an interest in collaborating with Panamanian authorities and scientists in this work as they plan canal operations and adaptation strategies for the coming decades.

###

 

Notes for journalists: 

This study is published in Geophysical Research Letters, an open-access AGU journal. View and download a pdf of the study here. Neither this press release nor the study is under embargo.  

Paper title:

“Drying of the Panama Canal in a Warming Climate”

 

Authors: 

  • Samuel E. Muñoz, Department of Marine & Environmental Sciences, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Lindsay Lawrence, Department of Marine & Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, USA
  • Shuochen Wang, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

AGU (www.agu.org) is a global community supporting more than half a million professionals and advocates in Earth and space sciences. Through broad and inclusive partnerships, AGU aims to advance discovery and solution science that accelerate knowledge and create solutions that are ethical, unbiased and respectful of communities and their values. Our programs include serving as a scholarly publisher, convening virtual and in-person events and providing career support. We live our values in everything we do, such as our net zero energy renovated building in Washington, D.C. and our Ethics and Equity Center, which fosters a diverse and inclusive geoscience community to ensure responsible conduct. 

 

Questionable lead reporting for drinking water virtually vanished after Flint water crisis, study reveals



UMass Amherst economists employ new statistical tools to detect suspicious reporting




University of Massachusetts Amherst





Public water systems in the U.S. were far less likely to report suspiciously rounded lead levels after the Flint, Michigan water crisis drew national outrage and federal scrutiny, according to new research led by the University of Massachusetts Amherst. 

The study, published as the first article in the latest issue of American Economic Review: Insightsintroduces new statistical methods to distinguish between natural rounding and potential “threshold manipulation” in reported figures.

“Existing methods can mistake rounding for manipulation,” explains Tihitina Andarge, assistant professor of resource economics at UMass Amherst. “Our approach allows us to separate the two.”

Andarge, David A. Keiser, professor of resource economics at UMass Amherst, Dalia Ghanem of the University of California, Davis, and Gabriel E. Lade of The Ohio State University analyzed how water systems reported lead concentrations from 2011 to 2020 under the Lead and Copper Rule, a key provision of the Safe Drinking Water Act. The rule requires systems to determine whether the 90th percentile of the lead concentrations in their water samples exceeds federal thresholds that can trigger additional monitoring, remediation and public notification.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies on self-reported figures from about 50,000 water systems nationwide. Systems with reported lead levels above 0.005 milligrams per liter must continue frequent testing, while those above 0.015 must take costly corrective steps and notify the public. This creates an incentive for systems to report values just under the cutoffs.

The study found that before the Flint crisis prompted a state of emergency in 2016, about 3% of medium-sized systems and about 0.5% of small systems reported lead concentrations rounded exactly to the federal threshold—a pattern the researchers say is statistically unlikely to occur by chance. After Flint, those suspicious clusters all but vanished, and reported data aligned more closely with expected distributions.

Andarge notes that among small water systems, this pattern was concentrated in Alabama, while among medium-sized systems, it appeared throughout the country, though at a smaller scale.

The Flint crisis, which exposed thousands to dangerous lead levels, heightened public and regulatory attention to water safety nationwide. The EPA issued new guidance discouraging questionable testing practices, such as sampling lower-risk homes or manipulating collection procedures.

“We want to make sure that our drinking water systems are following through on the correct ways to measure for lead concentrations, so that people can take corrective actions if they need to,” Keiser says.

While the study does not allege deliberate fraud, it points to vulnerabilities in how the U.S. monitors drinking water quality. The authors warn that without continued oversight, some systems may again face incentives to downplay lead risks.

The EPA revised the Lead and Copper Rule, which covers more than 90% of the U.S. population, in 2021 and 2024. Lead exposure, even at low levels, has been linked to developmental delays in children and cardiovascular problems in adults.

Keiser adds that the new statistical methods could be applied to other areas where threshold manipulation is a concern, including air quality monitoring and academic testing.

The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health.

 

Assessing overconfidence among national security officials



Dartmouth study analyzes assessments from NATO members and allies.



Dartmouth College






National security officials are "overwhelmingly overconfident," which hinders their ability to accurately assess uncertainty, according to new research by a Dartmouth government professor. When they thought statements had a 90% chance of being true, the statements were only true about 60% of the time, according to the study. 

The findings are published in the Texas National Security Review.

About 1,900 national security officials from more than 40 NATO allies and partners were surveyed on the uncertainty of current and future states of the world, and delivered a total of 60,000 assessments. The officials were enrolled at the U.S. National War College, the Canadian Forces College, the NATO Defense College, and the Norwegian Defense Intelligence School.

In the U.S., Canada, and Europe, once military officers achieve the rank of colonel, they must obtain a master's degree at a war college or other military institution as part of their professional military education. Participating institutions also contained a large fraction of civilian national security officials who work in foreign affairs ministries and intelligence agencies, among other areas. The study thus spanned both an unusually large, and representative, group of high-ranking national security officials.

The survey contained questions on international military, political, and economic affairs and  asked respondents to estimate the chances that a statement was true such as: "In your opinion, what are the chances that NATO's members spend more money on defense than the rest of the world combined?"

Other questions involved making predictions such as: "In your opinion, what are the chances that Ukraine and Russia will officially declare a ceasefire by a certain date?"

The results showed that national security officials are overconfident about the current and future state of the world—a cognitive bias that was consistent across all respondents, civilian and military professionals, men and women, and U.S. and non-U.S. citizens. They share these biases with the general public.

"National security officials are like many of us, in the sense that we tend to think we know more than we really do. This means that national security officials, like members of the general public, are consistently overconfident," says study author Jeffrey Friedman, an associate professor of government and member of the Davidson Institute for Global Security at Dartmouth. He says that overconfidence among national security officials is similar to biases he has found when conducting similar surveys with undergraduates, masters students, and financial professionals.

"However, the study also showed that it is possible to mitigate that bias substantially with just two minutes of training," says Friedman. His research found that briefly showing national security officials data on patterns of overconfidence led study participants to make judgments that substantially reduced overconfidence–and promoted accuracy.

The study also found that national security officials have a bias towards false positives— a tendency to think false statements are true.

This was demonstrated by flipping the wording of survey questions. In a subset of surveys, half of the participants were asked: "Has ISIS killed more civilians over the last decade than Boko Horam?" while the other half were asked: "Has Boko Haram killed more civilians than ISIS?" The answers that national security officials gave to these two questions consistently added up to more than 100%.

Friedman says that this finding indicates that national security officials appear to have a "tendency towards confirming rather than refuting possibilities they are asked to consider," which could be especially problematic for national security officials given that there could potentially be multiple outcomes to consider in military scenarios, rather than just one.

The study did suggest one potential remedy for the overconfidence–reminding national security officials of the perils of being too sure of their convictions.

Before a random subset of the national security officials were given the survey, they received information about other cohorts' overconfidence and biases. Through this two-minute training and informed approach, those participants were significantly better at assessing uncertainty.

Friedman says the four military institutions who took part in the study, deserve a ton of credit for their participation. The work had a ripple effect: the first cohort was from the National War College, which was so pleased with the session that they invited Friedman back, and then other military institutions came on board following recommendations by past participants. "It was very rewarding to see how receptive the national security officials were to the insights and training, as the training was then built into the core curricula at the institutions," says Friedman.

"Any organization that cares about improving people's ability to assess uncertainty in a more accurate manner can implement this training," says Friedman. "The material is posted online and can be developed and integrated into curricula anywhere, whether it be by military officials, diplomats, intelligence officers, business leaders, or others."

"By harnessing decision science tools, we can make people's judgements better," says Friedman.

Friedman is available for comment at: Jeffrey.A.Friedman@dartmouth.edu.

###