Saturday, October 18, 2025

 

Letting EVs take a load off the grid could result in 'negative emissions' while saving drivers money






University of Michigan
FacebooXLinkedIn
Smart charging and V2G incentivizes renewable energy creation, according to new study 

image: 

New research from the University of Michigan and Carnegie Mellon University shows how emerging electric vehicle charging approaches could spur the growth of renewable energy and reduce emissions from power generation.

view more 

Credit: J. Chen et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025 (DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5c06944) Image used under a CC BY license.




Letting electric vehicles strategically charge from and discharge to the grid could spark environmental and public health benefits for Americans, according to a new study from the University of Michigan and Carnegie Mellon University.

For one, it could reduce greenhouse gas and other air emissions in a way that would more than offset what's produced when charging EVs. In addition to mitigating climate change, this reduction in emissions would help alleviate some of the damaging health impacts and costs.

Furthermore, it could also help drivers sell stored energy to the grid and recoup some of their charging costs while incentivizing the construction of more renewable energy generators.

"These new installations would decarbonize not only EVs, but other parts of the whole power system," said Jiahui Chen, a lead author of the new study and U-M doctoral student in environment and sustainability. "By adding EV flexible loads, you actually reduce emissions from the entire grid."

The project was funded by U-M's School for Environment and Sustainability, as well as Carnegie Mellon's Department of Engineering and Public Policy and Department of Mechanical Engineering.

After solar panels and wind turbines are built, they provide nearly free energy without any greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, nature doesn't work on our schedules.  Without robust storage solutions, the clean energy that's made when the sun's shining and the wind is blowing is wasted when its supply exceeds the demand. 

Companies are starting to roll out new large-scale storage technologies to try and change that. But researchers have also realized a growing number of Americans could have another established solution sitting in their garages: electric vehicles. By strategically charging EVs and enabling them to send their stored energy at appropriate times to the grid, Americans could access more affordable energy with less emissions.

"You'd think if you're buying more electricity, you'd be creating more emissions, but it turns out you can actually reverse it, if you charge your vehicle at the right time. We call it 'negative vehicle emissions,'" said study senior co-author Jeremy Michalek, professor of mechanical engineering and of engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon. 

Central to these gains are two intertwined ideas that aren't brand new, but also aren't yet widely implemented in the U.S. The first is this idea of charging at the right time, or smart charging, when the grid is flush with energy from renewable sources.

The second key component is what's referred to as vehicle-to-grid, or V2G. With V2G, EV drivers could sell their stored clean energy to the grid when demand is high, instead of power plants needing to burn more fossil fuels to meet energy needs. 

"There are times when wind and solar are generating so much power that it cannot be consumed and, sadly, we have to waste that," Chen said. "We can use EVs to absorb that otherwise wasted very cheap, very clean energy. We can then use that energy at a later time, when it would cost more, and avoid burning fossil fuels to make it."

The combination of smart charging and V2G would support a system that incentivizes the building of more renewable energy plants. Once they are built, these resources can inject clean energy into the grid whenever they produce it, because wind and sunshine are free while oil and gas are not. 

"Once you have that wind and solar in place, it generates first. It displaces coal and natural gas even when EVs aren't charging. It's like the EVs trigger the building of these plants that then can run and displace fossil fuels all the time," Michalek said. "This low carbon infrastructure can supply everybody else who uses electricity as well."

The team is not the first to consider the ramifications of V2G and smart charging. But it is the first to model their impacts in a more comprehensive manner that accounts for their influence on the evolution of renewable energy in the country. 

"We tend to think of these things as separate and static. For example, there's a bunch of studies—including ones that I've done and Jeremy has done—that try to figure out whether electric vehicles cut emissions or not with a static grid," said Parth Vaishnav, senior co-author of the study and U-M professor of environment and sustainability. 

"But as things start electrifying and start interacting, it's incomplete to answer questions about one system without accounting for how it might change how another system is built and operated."

This modeling also used a fairly conservative outlook, Chen said. For example, it did not assume federal incentives, like the recently expired tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act for renewable energy. The researchers also considered scenarios that allowed for the deployment of large, stationary battery banks to store energy from the grid. While the details varied in those scenarios, the take-home messages remained the same, the authors said.

"EVs could still produce a lot of substantial benefits," Chen said. "You could say there is an additive relationship."

Michael Craig, U-M associate professor of environment and sustainability and of industrial and operations engineering, also contributed to the study, as did Matthew Bruchon, who worked on the project as a doctoral student at Carnegie Mellon.

Social media comments can act as “quick warning signals” against misinformation, study shows




University of Exeter




Comments from ordinary users on social media platforms can be a force for good, helping others identify false information and navigate what is accurate, new research shows.

 

However these same comments can also mislead when they are inaccurate, which makes it challenging for people to judge what can be trusted.

 

The study shows digital media literacy is not only about telling true from false but also about evaluating the reliability of user comments.

 

In a new book, The Power of the Crowd, Professor Florian Stöckel, from the University of Exeter, and his co-authors uncover this double-edged pattern. The book also shows how difficult it is for people to separate accurate from inaccurate information.

 

As part of a large-scale study with more than 10,000 participants across Germany, the UK, and Italy, researchers examined people’s ability to classify true and false news in social media posts. Participants were shown a set of false and true news posts drawn from real online content.

 

The study included forty-seven different topics, including health, technology, and politics, all drawn from real online content. False news posts came from material flagged by fact-checking organizations in each country. The findings highlight just how challenging it is for people to identify false information: most false news stories were considered accurate by at least three out of ten people, and some were judged true by around half of respondents.

 

The study reveals that comments from everyday users can act as signals for others, pointing to what is true and what is not. When accurate, these comments help users spot misinformation. But when misleading, they can undermine trust in correct information.

 

Professor Stöckel said: “We found that user comments function like quick warning signals. People process them in a rather superficial way instead of engaging in deeper reasoning. That makes them useful when they are right, but also explains why inaccurate comments mislead so easily.”

 

Encouragingly, the research also shows that the public broadly supports correcting false content. Survey data from Germany, for example, show that 73% of respondents prefer content to be corrected even if doing so draws more attention to the original misinformation. This is promising for those who consider whether to get involved in online debates: others are likely to appreciate it when false content is flagged.

 

The book also offers practical advice on how to write effective corrections. People do not need to compose lengthy comments; even short statements can be effective. What matters most is that those who post corrections get their facts right. Before posting a correction, it may be worth double-checking, for example by consulting the website of a fact-checking organisation.

 

Professor Stöckel said: “The potential of corrective comments lies in the fact that they offer all users a way to improve the information environment on social media even if platforms do not act.”

 

The research also shows that people are more likely to believe false news when it aligns with their prior attitudes. The authors accounted for this in their analyses and still found small but consistent effects of corrective comments across countries.

 

The fieldwork was carried out in 2022 and 2023. It included posts on public health (COVID-19, vaccines, smoking), technology (the 5G cellphone network), climate change, and politics. Around 1,900 people in Britain, 2,400 in Italy, and 2,200 in Germany took part in the initial study, with an additional 4,000 people in Germany participating in a follow-up survey.

 

The Power of the Crowds is co-authored by Florian Stöckel (University of Exeter), Sabrina Stöckli (Bern University of Applied Sciences), Ben Lyons (University of Utah), Hannah Kroker (University of Edinburgh), and Jason Reifler (University of Southampton). It is published in the Experimental Political Science Elements Series by Cambridge University Press.

 

Smartphone-based relaxation program reduces disability for emergency department migraine patients




NYU Langone Health / NYU Grossman School of Medicine




A smartphone app for muscle relaxation significantly reduced migraine-related disability in patients visiting the emergency department, a new study shows.  

Led by researchers from NYU Langone Health, the study featured a smartphone-based app that guides patients with migraine through progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), an evidence-based treatment for migraine in which patients tense and then relax one muscle group at a time.

Publishing online October 16 in JAMA Network Open, the work shows that the percentage of  patients that had at least a five-point improvement in a standard score of migraine-driven disability nearly doubled for those who used the app versus those who did not. The study used the Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS), a questionnaire that asks about the number of days over three months that migraine caused a person to miss work, school, or social events.

"Our findings highlight the potential of smartphone-based interventions to empower patients in managing their own migraine, and in reducing migraine-related disability without medication," said lead study author Mia Minen, MD, MPH, associate professor in the Departments of Neurology and Population Health at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Migraine consists of painful, recurrent attacks that can last for hours or days, often with nausea, vomiting, or sensitivity to light or sound. It affects more than 14% of people globally and is a frequent cause of repeated emergency department (ED) visits, say the study authors. Nearly half (46%) of patients discharged from the ED with a migraine diagnosis revisit the ED within 3 months.

“The RELAXaHEAD app is meant to reduce migraine disability and hopefully reduce the rate at which patients return to the emergency department for migraine,” added Minen, director of Headache Research at NYU Langone.   

Better the More it is Used

This clinical trial involved 69 participants aged 18 to 65 who visited NYU Langone Health's emergency departments for migraine between 2019 and 2021. Participants were randomly assigned to use either the RELAXaHEAD app with progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) or to be in a control group that used only a headache diary.

The number of study patients that had at least a five-point improvement in MIDAS score was 45.7% among those without the PMR and 82.4% with PMR. The research team also found that those who used PMR more frequently experienced better outcomes, suggesting a dose-response relationship.

“While the study did not find significant differences in the number of monthly headache days, the PMR group's improvement in disability is really meaningful,” said Dr. Minen. Moving forward, her team is conducting a large-scale clinical study funded by the National Institutes of Health to evaluate the study app for people with migraine, not in emergency departments, but instead in primary care settings, where such patients most often present for care. 

Along with Dr. Minen, study authors were Elizabeth Seng of Ferkauf of the Graduate School of Psychology at Yeshiva University; Benjamin Friedman in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Richard Lipton in the Department of Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Alexis George in the doctoral program in psychology at City University of New York, Kristina Fanning and Ryan Bostic of MIST Research and Statistical Consulting, and Scott Powers in the Department of Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grants NCCIH K23 AT009706 and NIH NCATS UL1 TR001445.

Dr. Minen has financial interests in the  app and its RELAXaHEAD underlying intellectual property, which has been licensed to CareTurner. These interests could benefit from the outcome of this study and are managed according to the policies of NYU Langone Health.

About NYU Langone Health
NYU Langone Health is a fully integrated health system that consistently achieves the best patient outcomes through a rigorous focus on quality that has resulted in some of the lowest mortality rates in the nation. Vizient, Inc., has ranked NYU Langone No. 1 out of 118 comprehensive academic medical centers across the nation for four years in a row, and U.S. News & World Report recently ranked four of its clinical specialties (including Neurology) number one in the nation. NYU Langone offers a comprehensive range of medical services with one high standard of care across seven inpatient locations, its Perlmutter Cancer Center, and more than 320 outpatient locations in the New York area and Florida. With $14.2 billion in revenue this year, the system also includes two tuition-free medical schools, in Manhattan and on Long Island, and a vast research enterprise.