Wednesday, October 22, 2025

BIG OIL DENIES CLIMATE CRISIS


U.S. and Qatar Issue New Warning on EU Climate Directive

The United States and Qatar have joined forces for a fresh warning to Brussels that its corporate sustainability directive risks LNG imports from two of the world’s biggest exporters at a time when the EU is trying to ban all Russian gas imports.

Per a joint letter cited by the Financial Times, Washington and Doha are concerned that the directive would affect their exports of liquefied, meaning they would not be able to export as much of the commodity to the EU as they did previously.

Qatar has earlier stated it would suspend all LNG exports to the EU if it goes through with the directive, which requires importers into the European Union to provide proof they protect human rights and work on reducing their emissions unless they want to face fines with a sum equal to as much as 5% of their annual global turnover.

“This comes at a critical moment when our countries and companies are striving not only to sustain but to significantly increase the reliable supply of LNG to the EU,” the U.S. and Qatar said in the letter.

“Beyond the direct energy security risks, the CSDDD also threatens to disrupt trade and investments across nearly all the EU’s partner economies. Its implementation could jeopardise existing and future investments, employment, and compliance with recent trade agreements,” the letter also said.

A couple of months ago, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made a commitment on behalf of the EU to buy $750 billion worth of U.S. energy commodities in a trade deal criticized massively in Europe. Passing the CSDDD would seriously compromise efforts to fulfil this debatable commitment.

The United States and Qatar together account for about 20% of the European Union’s total natural gas imports. The share is almost equal to Russia’s 19%, which the EU wants to give up by 2027.  

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com


Eni’s 2025 World Energy Review Shows Continued Dominance of Oil and Gas

Global energy demand rose 2% in 2024, with fossil fuels maintaining their central role despite record renewable growth, according to Eni’s 24th World Energy Review.

Eni’s annual statistical analysis reveals that global energy consumption continued its steady rise in 2024 amid moderate economic growth and geopolitical tensions. Oil demand reached 102.8 million barrels per day, up 0.8 Mb/d from 2023, largely driven by China, India, Latin America, and the Middle East. Brent crude averaged $80.8 per barrel for the year—down 2%—as market expectations of higher OPEC+ supply and global economic concerns weighed on prices.

In natural gas markets, international hub prices fell 14% year-over-year due to mild weather and high inventories early in 2024, before rebounding in the second half on renewed Asian demand. Global gas demand grew 3%, led by China, while Europe’s consumption was largely flat. LNG trade capacity expanded again, with liquefaction rising 1.4% and regasification 4%, driven by projects in Indonesia, China, and Europe.

Renewables continued their record-breaking expansion, reaching nearly 3,000 GW of installed solar and wind capacity globally—accounting for 15% of total electricity generation. Traditional sources still produced roughly 60% of global power. Biofuel production rose 7%, led by the United States and Indonesia, while the output of critical minerals essential for the energy transition climbed 5.5%, with cobalt surging 21%.

Despite advances in clean energy, global CO? emissions increased 0.8%, driven by rising output in emerging economies, while advanced economies registered further declines.

The findings underscore the structural inertia of the global energy system, where fossil fuels remain dominant despite surging renewable installations and rising policy momentum for decarbonization. Eni’s World Energy Review—one of the sector’s key statistical publications—offers data and analysis on oil, gas, renewables, and critical minerals, along with economic and demographic indicators shaping demand trends.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

DOE Approves Venture Global’s $10 Billion CP2 LNG Export Terminal

The U.S. Department of Energy has approved Venture Global’s CP2 LNG project in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, to export up to 3.96 billion cubic feet per day of liquefied natural gas to countries without a free trade agreement with the United States. The decision marks the final regulatory milestone for one of the largest U.S. LNG export projects currently under development.

The authorization was signed today by U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, who emphasized the administration’s push to expand American energy exports and restore what he described as “energy dominance” under President Trump. “Finalizing the non-FTA authorization for CP2 LNG will enable secure and reliable American energy access for our allies and trading partners, while also providing well-paid jobs and economic opportunities at home,” said Kyle Haustveit, Assistant Secretary of the Office of Fossil Energy.

The decision follows DOE’s conditional approval granted in March 2025 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s May 2025 authorization for siting, construction, and operation of the $10 billion CP2 LNG terminal. The DOE also cited its updated 2024 LNG Export Study, reaffirming that U.S. LNG exports enhance global energy security and economic competitiveness while benefiting domestic workers.

The CP2 project, located adjacent to Venture Global’s existing Calcasieu Pass LNG terminal, is designed to include up to 20 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) of liquefaction capacity. Venture Global has already secured long-term offtake agreements with several major international buyers, positioning CP2 as a key driver of U.S. LNG growth in the late 2020s.

The move comes as the Trump administration seeks to reverse the previous LNG export pause implemented under President Biden. On his first day in office, President Trump directed DOE to resume approvals of pending applications for non-FTA exports, leading to what the department describes as a record pace of authorizations. According to DOE data, the administration has now approved more than 13.8 Bcf/d of new LNG export capacity—surpassing the total current exports of the world’s second-largest LNG supplier.

U.S. LNG exports have surged to approximately 15 Bcf/d, up around 25% from 2024 levels, supported by strong global demand and continued infrastructure expansion along the Gulf Coast. The CP2 approval solidifies Louisiana’s role as a central hub for America’s LNG ambitions, strengthening the country’s position as the world’s leading LNG exporter.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com


U.S. Buys a Token Barrel to Refill the Strategic Reserve

The Trump administration is dipping its toe—barely—into refilling the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), announcing plans to purchase one million barrels of crude for delivery in December and January. The move, while symbolically significant, amounts to little more than a rounding error in a reserve that once held 700 million barrels.

The Department of Energy will use $171 million from President Trump’s new tax and spending law to fund the purchase, issuing a solicitation for crude to be delivered to the Bayou Choctaw site in Louisiana. Bids are due by October 28, with contracts tied to spot market prices.

At around $58 per barrel, the timing is opportunistic. WTI has fallen roughly 30% since January amid swelling inventories, record U.S. production of 13.6 million bpd, and a global supply glut that has traders talking about $50 crude again.

The SPR—America’s emergency oil cushion—was gutted during the Biden years, when 180 million barrels were released to tame gasoline prices. That drawdown left the reserve at its lowest level in four decades, around 395 million barrels.

Refilling it won’t be cheap or quick. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has said it could take years and as much as $20 billion to rebuild the stockpile. Congress has since pushed through $1.3 billion in funding for refills and maintenance while repealing the mandatory drawdowns that raided the reserve in prior years.

Still, a one-million-barrel purchase is more political gesture than energy strategy. With maintenance delays pushing other scheduled deliveries into late 2025, and each government buy signaling to traders that prices could rise, Washington is walking a fine line between refilling reserves and fueling another rally.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com




 

Waymo's UK Launch Sparks Debate on Autonomous Vehicle Laws

The UK is set to become the first European country to welcome Waymo’s driverless taxis but lawyers caution that current laws are fundamentally incompatible with the technology.

Last week, Waymo announced its UK launch will start with a small fleet of human-supervised Jaguar I-PACE electric vehicles “in the coming weeks,” before moving to fully autonomous operations by 2026.

Waymo’s Ethan Teicher told City AM“We’ll start with a small fleet and gradually expand, working closely with the Department for Transport and Transport for London to ensure safety and regulatory compliance at every stage.”

But lawyers have raised questions of liability, arguing that the current legal system simply isn’t ready for driverless cars.

Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, told City AM: “Our current system of motoring offences is built upon a fundamental, and until now, unshakeable principle, the principle of human agency. Every driving offence requires a culpable human mind behind the wheel.”

“The arrival of true driverless cars, where no human is monitoring or controlling the vehicle, shatters this principle and forces us to confront a legal vacuum,” he added.

“If a driverless car exceeds the speed limit, crashes into another vehicle or property, or causes injury, who carries the blame? Is it Waymo? The car manufacturer? Or the software engineer who wrote the code?”

Back in January, a Waymo vehicle was involved, although not at fault, in a deadly, multi-car collision in San Francisco. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), as of June 2025, Waymo vehicles were involved in 398 collisions in the US.

For the UK, Darius Latham-Koenig, Associate at Grosvenor Law, noted, the “legal questions of liability are yet to be adequately resolved, particularly in an accident scenario”. He explained that the implementation of the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 “should be heavily scrutinised to ensure legal clarification.”

Automated Vehicles Act

William Smith, partner at Addleshaw Goddard, stated: “The legislative framework is in place, but there is still a lot of detail to be fleshed out, particularly around liability, enforcement and data governance.”

Back in May 2024, a Bill to regulate the use of automated vehicles on roads and in other public places, and to make other provisions in relation to vehicle automation, became law.

Andrew Sanderson, partner specialising in transport law, at Kingsley Napley, said that this law introduced a new legal category: authorised self-driving entities.

“These entities, not human drivers, will be held to safety standards equal to or better than those of a competent driver. This shift means liability in the event of an accident could rest with software developers, manufacturers, fleet operators, or even infrastructure providers, not just the person behind the wheel,” he explained.

He noted that under the previous law, the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018, insurers were already liable for accidents involving automated vehicles. But the updated legislation goes further, addressing complex issues such as transitioning between manual and automated modes, cybersecurity risks, and data sharing obligations.

Sanderson did suggest this law should be a “wake-up call” for insurers and transport companies.

“The traditional fault-based model is being replaced by a system-centric approach. New insurance products are emerging to separate human error from system failure, and regulators are demanding clarity on cybersecurity, data sharing, and operational protocols,” he added.

Now that driverless cars are moving from novelty to reality on UK roads, Sanderson warns, “Legal professionals must be ready to advise on a landscape where liability is shared, complex, and constantly evolving.”

“This is an exciting time for London and the UK as it will see the introduction of modern on-demand mobility like we have seen adopted in other parts of the world like San Francisco and the UAE,” Smith added.

However, the true impact of this law remains untested, and it’s unclear whether unforeseen gaps will emerge as driverless vehicles become more common on UK roads.

By City AM 

 

Survey: Californians don’t know cannabis driving laws



Cannabis and driving laws help protect public safety, but many Californians don’t know them, putting drivers, passengers, and communities at risk




University of California - San Diego





A new study from University of California San Diego has found that, while a third of Californians use cannabis regularly, there are significant gaps in knowledge around cannabis use and driving. The researchers found that even six years after the legalization of recreational cannabis use, adults in California demonstrate mixed awareness and knowledge of driving-related laws and regulations.

The study results, published in BMC Public Health, come from a large-scale survey of cannabis use in California, titled Impact 64, which was funded by the California Department of Cannabis Control and surveyed over 4,000 Californians who currently use cannabis.

"Many people who currently use cannabis are unaware of regulations and laws around driving and cannabis use, putting themselves and others at risk," said the study’s first author Sara Baird, M.D., associate physician diplomate at the UC San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science. "There is a clear need for targeted education initiatives to address these knowledge gaps and promote safe driving practices."

As cannabis use becomes more mainstream, concerns about its risks to public health, such as impaired driving, have increased. In order to mitigate these risks, the Impact 64 study gathered both qualitative and quantitative data about cannabis use in California through an online questionnaire. This included questions about the driving-related provisions of Proposition 64, such as the requirement that all cannabis containers in a vehicle be unopened and that drivers and passengers cannot smoke or ingest cannabis in a moving vehicle.

"One of the unique strengths of the Impact 64 study is its comprehensive and representative design," said Thomas Marcotte, Ph.D., the study’s senior author, co-principal investigator of Impact 64, professor of psychiatry and co-director of the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research at UC San Diego School of Medicine. “This data paints a detailed picture of how many people in California are using cannabis and what they understand about the laws governing its use.”

The researchers found that:

  • 64% of current cannabis users reported feeling safe to drive 3 hours or less after inhalation of flower products (e.g. smoking, dry herb vaping), and 55% felt safe to drive 5 hours or less after consumption of edible cannabis products.
  • Only 59% were aware that any container of cannabis inside a moving vehicle must be unopened and sealed, including if stored in the trunk.
  • 62% of current cannabis users were aware that drivers and passengers cannot smoke or ingest cannabis in a moving vehicle, and 73% knew it was true that driving under the influence of cannabis can result in a DUI citation and/or arrest.
  • Those with lower knowledge of Prop 64 driving related regulations were more likely to ever have been pulled over or involved in a crash while under the influence of cannabis.

We need to educate the public about the risks of driving under the influence of cannabis and the laws that are in place to protect public safety," said Linda Hill, M.D., M.P.H., principal investigator of Impact 64, distinguished professor at the UC San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, and affiliate faculty at the Qualcomm Institute. "Our study highlights the need for targeted education initiatives for cannabis users and medical providers."

Read the full study.

Additional co-authors of the study include Daniel Ageze , Sarah Hacker and Renee Dell’Acqua at UC San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science and Alice Gold, Ilene Lanin-Kettering and Tom Shaughnessy and at Quester.

This study was funded by the California Department of Cannabis Control (Grant #: 65334).

Disclosures: The authors declare no competing interests.

# # #

As millions protested, a separate big Trump demonstration sent an appalling message

Robert Reich
October 20, 2025 
RAW ST0RY


A dog carries a sign as tens of thousands of "No Kings" demonstrators fill McCall Park and both the Morrison and Hawthorne Bridges in Portland, Oregon, U.S., October 18, 2025. REUTERS/John Rudoff

The U.S. Marine Corps — under the watchful eyes of Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — staged a demonstration on Saturday in southern California.

It wasn’t a No Kings demonstration, though. It was more like a Yes Kings demonstration.

Some of the Marine Corps’ shells that were fired by M777 howitzers across California’s Interstate 5 prematurely detonated, sending shrapnel down on what could have been hundreds of motorists.


Why the hell did the Marine Corps fire artillery shells over Interstate 5 anyway?

Interstate 5 is the largest and most-traveled north-south freeway in California.

The military demonstration was part of an exercise marking the Marine Corps’ 250th anniversary.

Beforehand, the military predicted that the exercise would be safe, but California Governor Gavin Newsom disagreed.

“Firing live rounds over a busy highway isn’t just wrong — it’s dangerous,” Newsom said last week.

Newsom was so concerned about the plan that he ordered a 17-mile stretch closed of the freeway closed between Los Angeles and San Diego — which caused significant backups on that portion of the interstate, used by approximately 80,000 people daily.

Before the mishap, Vance’s office disputed Newsom’s claim that the live rounds were dangerous, saying the Marine Corp’s demonstration was “an established safe practice.”

“If Gavin Newsom wants to oppose the training exercises that ensure our Armed Forces are the deadliest and most lethal fighting force in the world, then he can go right ahead,” Vance’s communications director said in a statement. “It would come as no surprise that he would stoop so low considering his pathetic track record of failure as governor.”

After the round prematurely exploded on Saturday, the whole exercise — which was expected to include the firing of approximately 60 155-millimeter shells — was terminated.


An active-duty Marine artillery officer and a former Marine artillery noncommissioned officer who spoke to the New York Times described the exercise as “unusual.”

They said the only howitzer training they had previously observed at Camp Pendleton had taken place at approved artillery ranges on the main side of base, east of the interstate, which they said were a much safer option for training.

A highway patrol official based in the area also described it as “unusual and concerning.”

Tony Coronado, the highway patrol’s border division chief, said in a statement that “it is highly uncommon for any live-fire or explosive training activity to occur near an active freeway.”

So what’s going on here? Why did the Marine Corps decide to fire live artillery shells across California’s major interstate freeway on Saturday?

Could the decision have had anything to do with the planned No Kings demonstrations in California on Saturday — the heart of anti-Trump country — and the well-known fact that Trump hates California?

Just asking.


Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.

Robert Reich's new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org.