Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Malaria parasites are full of wildly spinning iron crystals. Scientists finally know why.



University of Utah Health
Malaria crystal still 

image: 

Microscope image of a live malaria parasite (guitar pick shape) inside a human red blood cell (large circle).

view more 

Credit: Erica Hastings, PhD



Key points:

  • The parasite that causes the deadly disease malaria is full of tiny crystals that constantly spin—a mystery for decades.
  • New research found that the crystals are propelled by peroxide breakdown, the same reaction that launches rockets.
  • Crystal spin may help parasites survive by “burning off” toxic peroxide or helping store toxic iron compounds. 

IMPACT: The results could lead to new malaria medicines and inspire better nanorobots.

Every cell of the deadly Plasmodium falciparum parasite, the organism that causes malaria, contains a tiny compartment full of microscopic iron crystals. As long as the parasite is alive, the crystals dance. They spin, jolt, and ricochet in their little bubble like change in an overclocked washing machine, too fast and chaotic to even be tracked by traditional scientific techniques. And when the parasite dies, they stop.

The iron crystals have long been an important target for antimalarial drugs, but their motion has mystified scientists since it was first detected. “People don’t talk about what they don’t understand, and because the motion of these crystals is so mysterious and bizarre, it’s been a blind spot for parasitology for decades,” says Paul Sigala, PhD, associate professor of biochemistry in the Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine (SFESOM) at the University of Utah.

Now, Sigala’s research team has finally found what makes the crystals dance: the same chemical reaction that powers spacefaring rockets. 

The findings could reveal new targets for malaria treatments and provide new insights for creating nanoscale robots. 

The results are published in PNAS.

Biological rocket fuel

The crystals, which are made of an iron-based compound called heme, move by triggering the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen, the researchers discovered. The reaction releases energy, giving the crystals the “kick” they need to spin into motion.

It’s a form of propulsion common in aerospace engineering, where peroxide fuel launches satellites into orbit, but previously unknown in biology. “This hydrogen peroxide decomposition has been used to power large-scale rockets,” says Erica Hastings, PhD, postdoctoral fellow in biochemistry in the SFESOM. “But I don’t think it has ever been observed in biological systems.”

Hydrogen peroxide is found at high levels inside the microscopic compartment that contains iron crystals, and parasites make the compound as a waste product, so it had stood out to the researchers as a potential chemical fuel that might power the crystals’ motion. Indeed, the scientists found that hydrogen peroxide on its own was enough to set purified crystals spinning—no parasite required. 

Conversely, when the researchers raised malaria parasites at unusually low levels of oxygen, which lowers the amount of peroxide parasites produce, the crystals decelerated to about half their normal speed, even though the parasites were otherwise healthy.

Crystal motion may aid parasite survival

The researchers suspect that the frenetic motion of the crystals may be important for malaria parasites to stay alive, and they have a few ideas why. Peroxide itself is extremely toxic to cells. The spinning crystals might be a way for the malaria organism to “burn off” excess toxic peroxide before it can cause harmful chemical reactions and damage the parasite.

Sigala adds that the spinning motion might also help the parasite quickly deal with excess heme by keeping crystals from clumping together. Clumped-up crystals would prevent the parasite from storing additional heme as quickly, because they’d have less available surface to add new heme to. By keeping the crystals in constant motion, the malaria parasite may ensure that it’s able to sequester additional heme efficiently.

Powering new robots and new drugs

The spinning crystals are the first known example in biology of a self-propelled metallic nanoparticle, the researchers say. But they suspect that this phenomenon is much more widespread.

The new findings could inspire improved designs for microscopic robots, the researchers add. 

“Nano-engineered self-propelling particles can be used for a variety of industrial and drug delivery applications, and we think there are potential insights that will come from these results,” Sigala says.

The results could also eventually lead to better antimalarial drugs, the researchers say. “We think that the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide likely makes an important contribution to reducing cellular stress,” Sigala says. “If there are ways to block the chemistry at the crystal surface, that alone might be sufficient to kill parasites.”

Their tiny chemical rockets are wildly different from any known aspect of human biology—and that means that they’re a powerful potential drug target. Drugs that target such a parasite-unique mechanism are much less likely to have dangerous side effects. “If we target a drug to an area that’s very different from human cells, then it’s probably not going to have extreme side effects,” Hastings explains. “If we can define how this parasite is different from our bodies, it gives us access to new directions for medications.”

###
The results are published in PNAS as “Chemical propulsion of hemozoin crystal motion in malaria parasites.

The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R35GM133764, R21AI185746, R35GM14749, and T32AI055434), the Utah Center for Iron & Heme Disorders (grant number U54DK110858), the Price College of Engineering at the University of Utah, and the 3i Initiative at University of Utah Health. Content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.


Electron microscopy image of a malaria parasite inside a human red blood cell. The black brick-like shapes are iron crystals.

Credit

Erica Hastings, PhD

 SPACE/COSMOS

UNM research suggests Halloween fireballs could signal increased risk of cosmic impact or airburst in 2032 and 2036




University of New Mexico
Simulation of Taurid Stream 

video: 

Taurid Resonate Swarm in 2032 animation 

view more 

Credit: Mark Boslough et. al IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2025






Every year, the Taurid meteor shower lights up the night sky from late October through early November. Sometimes called the “Halloween fireballs”, they are named for the constellation Taurus—the bull—from which the meteors appear to radiate, the shower is best viewed from dark-sky locations. In New Mexico, where wide-open spaces and low light pollution offer some of the clearest skies in the country, stargazers have a front-row seat to the spectacle.

Meteors are flashes and streaks of light that appear when dust, pebbles and rocks burn up as they enter Earth’s atmosphere. These fragments come from Comet Encke, which has left a trail of debris orbiting the sun. Twice a year, this stream intersects with Earth’s orbit—once around Halloween, when the Taurids are visible at night, and again in June, during the daytime. The June meteors, known as the Beta Taurids, can’t be seen in the daytime sky unless they are exceptionally bright fireballs.

But what would happen if much larger Taurids came a little too close to Earth?

New research led by Research Professor Mark Boslough, recently published in a special issue of Acta Astronautica, the proceedings of this year’s Planetary Defense Conference in Cape Town, South Africa, explores this idea. The research titled, “2032 and 2036 risk enhancement from NEOs in the Taurid stream: Is there a significant coherent component to impact risk?” explores the risk assessment for planetary defense. 

“Planetary defense is the multidisciplinary and internationally coordinated effort to protect the Earth and its inhabitants from impacts by near-Earth objects (NEOs),” explained Boslough. “It requires surveys to discover and track NEOs, campaigns to characterize those that are hazardous, modeling efforts to understand and predict impact effects and associated consequences, and mitigation through impact avoidance and/or civil defense.”

A near-Earth object, or NEO, is an asteroid, comet or fragment whose orbit comes close to or can cross Earth’s path around the sun. These objects have the potential to collide with our planet, but only if their orbit intersects Earth’s and they arrive there at the exact same time. Small particles, such as the dust and pebbles that create the Taurid “Halloween fireballs,” enter our atmosphere regularly. Larger objects, like those responsible for the Chelyabinsk meteor and Tunguska events, strike far less often.

Mitigation requires the development of ways to deflect or disperse an object on a collision course with sufficient warning, as well as emergency response planning for unexpected or unpreventable impacts.

The research incorporated recently published data from observational campaigns associated with the Taurid stream. The researchers found that the risk from airburst-sized near-Earth objects (NEOs), which are small enough to explode in the atmosphere instead of striking the ground, might be larger than currently estimated. Likewise, the researchers also investigated the possibility of a Taurid resonant swarm (TRS).

“The resonant swarm is theoretical, but there is some evidence that a sparse swarm of small objects exists because bright fireballs and seismic signatures of impacts on the moon have been observed at times that the theory has predicted,” explained Boslough.

Objects in the Taurid stream orbit the sun seven times for every two orbits of Jupiter. This cycle, known as a resonance, means that part of the stream approaches Jupiter at regular intervals. Because Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system, its strong gravity can pull these objects together, creating dense clusters. It’s somewhat like a prospector panning for gold—swirling the pan at just the right rhythm to make the specks collect in one place.

The findings suggest that if a Taurid swarm does exist it will pass close to Earth in 2032 and 2036. During this time, Earth could experience higher impact risk.

“Our findings are that we have the technology to test the Taurid resonant swarm by using existing telescopes for targeted sky surveys in 2032 and 2036 when the hypothetical swarm will make very close approaches,” said Boslough.

In 2032 and 2036, objects in a hypothetical Taurid swarm could be observable according to the researchers and the risk from airburst-sized NEOS might be larger than currently estimated. A concentration of larger (Chelyabinsk or Tunguska-sized) objects in a swarm would be observable by telescopes, if they exist, but only after they miss the Earth and recede into the night-time sky. 

Boslough’s airburst models during his time at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) explores the Chelyabinsk explosion and estimate that the asteroid was about 60 feet in diameter and had an explosive yield of about a half megaton (TNT equivalent). Likewise, the Tunguska was probably about 10 times more powerful (3 to 5 megatons), also based on Boslough’s SNL analysis.

“If we discover the objects with enough warning time, then we can take measures to reduce or eliminate the risk. If the new infrared telescope (NEO Surveyor) is in operation, then we can potentially have much more warning time,” he said.

The research was funded by NASA at UNM and in partnership with NNSA funding at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in the planetary defense program.

Boslough suggests that it is important for citizens to be aware of various geohazards including weather, fire, earthquakes, and volcanoes, and to put them in perspective, and to be prepared to act.

“Asteroid impacts represent a small but significant risk, and New Mexico’s national labs have some of the best minds working on the problem,” he said. 

One of the key lessons from the Chelyabinsk event is that most injuries were caused by flying glass when people rushed to windows to watch the bright flash in the sky. If a similar event were to occur over New Mexico, this would likely be the primary cause of injury. Experts say the public can learn from Chelyabinsk and to stay away from windows and avoid looking directly at the blast.

The 2032 pass of the hypothetical swarm will arrive from the night-time side of the Earth. Boslough says that the probability of an impact or airburst might be higher than average, if the hypothesis of a significant concentration is correct.

Boslough explains that there are such things as daytime fireballs, but they must be extremely bright in order to compete with the sun. A concentration of objects in a swarm (if it exists) would be observable by telescopes after they miss the Earth and recede into the night.

“The average probability is extremely low, so even an enhanced risk means that the probability would still be low. The swarm will come from the direction of the sun in 2036, so fireballs will not be seen in our blue skies unless they are extremely bright,” he explained. 

Magdelena Ridge observatory near Socorro is involved in the observational part of planetary defense, and both SNL and LANL have active planetary defense programs. While the university and national laboratories are continuing to research the TRS, Boslough cautions the public about where they get their information from.

“A lot of false information and mythology about this subject has been promulgated on social media, online sources, and sensational TV shows. This media gives the public the wrong impression about NEOs, impacts, and airbursts, and what we can do to reduce the risk,” he said.

Boslough has also been active in debunking this misinformation. His published research was instrumental in one journal’s decision to retract, due to the authors’ misunderstandings of airburst phenomena and evidence, a much-publicized claim that an ancient city in Jordan was destroyed by an Tunguska-sized airburst. He also coauthored a comprehensive refutation of the fringe idea that the Taurid swarm was responsible for a climate catastrophe 12,900 years ago.  

Want to get an up-close view of the Taurids show soon? Boslough says that there are a few opportunities coming up to view including the night of Halloween after 2 a.m. They should be visible when the moon is not in the sky. A few days after the next full moon on Nov. 5, the Taurids show should be viewable in the sky in the evening before moonrise.

Simulation of Taurid Resonat Swarm in 2036 [VIDEO] 


Fragment of clear Libyan Desert glass refracts intense sunlight in the Great Sand Sea of Egypt, during a research expedition for the BBC/National Geographic documentary “Tutankhamun’s Fireball” in which Boslough first proposed the hypothesis that it was formed by a “type 2” (also called “touchdown”) airburst event.

Credit

Photo Credit: Mark Boslough, Feb. 2006

During the filming of a NOVA documentary “Meteor Strike” two weeks after the Chelyabinsk airburst, Mark Boslough notices the Tsarev Meteorite, which fell in Russia on Dec. 6, 1922, on the floor of a meteoritics lab in Yekaterinburg where the freshly fallen Chelyabinsk meteorites were being analyzed.

Credit

Mark Boslough

 

Biochar’s hidden helper: Dissolved organic matter boosts lead removal from polluted water




Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University
Binding mechanisms of Pb(II) adsorption by biochar-derived dissolved organic matter: unraveling site heterogeneity and kinetics through advanced spectral analysis 

image: 

Binding mechanisms of Pb(II) adsorption by biochar-derived dissolved organic matter: unraveling site heterogeneity and kinetics through advanced spectral analysis

view more 

Credit: Fuxiang Zhang, Boyang Zhou, Qiang Fu, Hongliang Jia, Yi-Fan Li, Yongzhen Ding & Song Cui





A new study reveals that a small but powerful component of biochar, known as dissolved organic matter, plays a surprisingly large role in capturing toxic lead from contaminated water. The research, published in Biochar, uncovers how this dissolved material enhances the metal-binding power of biochar and offers molecular-level insights that could guide safer and more effective cleanup strategies.

Biochar, a carbon-rich substance produced by heating crop residues or other organic waste in limited oxygen, has been widely used to immobilize heavy metals in soils and water. However, scientists have long puzzled over why biochar made at lower temperatures often shows higher metal removal efficiency. The new study provides an answer.

Researchers from Northeast Agricultural University and collaborating institutions compared the ability of regular and water-washed biochar to capture lead ions. When the biochar’s dissolved organic matter was removed by washing, its lead adsorption capacity dropped by nearly two-thirds, from 96 to 35 milligrams per gram. This dramatic decline pointed to a hidden but essential role of the dissolved organic fraction.

Using a suite of advanced spectroscopic tools, including infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and multidimensional fluorescence analyses, the team mapped how lead interacts with the functional groups present in biochar and its dissolved components. They found that oxygen-containing groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, and ether groups form strong chemical complexes with lead, rather than relying solely on physical trapping. Most of the bound lead was identified as stable compounds such as basic lead carbonate, indicating that chemical complexation is the dominant mechanism of immobilization.

Fluorescence and ultraviolet analyses further revealed that the dissolved organic matter in biochar is far from uniform. It contains multiple humic-like components, each showing different reactivity toward lead. Among them, one component rich in humic and tyrosine-like substances showed the strongest binding affinity. Additional two-dimensional correlation analyses demonstrated that carboxyl groups in humic substances respond most rapidly and strongly to lead exposure, confirming that these groups serve as key binding sites.

“By combining several complementary spectroscopic methods, we could visualize how different molecular sites within dissolved organic matter interact with lead,” said corresponding author Professor Song Cui of Northeast Agricultural University. “These insights help explain why certain types of biochar perform better in removing heavy metals and how we can design them more effectively.”

The findings provide not only a mechanistic understanding of biochar’s interaction with lead but also a scientific foundation for developing next-generation biochar materials enriched with reactive carboxyl and humic-like structures. Such materials could significantly improve the stability and efficiency of heavy-metal remediation in real environmental conditions.

The authors emphasize that future work should examine how biochar interacts with mixtures of metals and under varying pH levels that mimic natural soils and waters. Understanding these complex interactions will be critical for scaling up biochar-based technologies to protect ecosystems and human health from heavy-metal pollution.

 

=== 

Journal Reference: Zhang, F., Zhou, B., Fu, Q. et al. Binding mechanisms of Pb(II) adsorption by biochar-derived dissolved organic matter: unraveling site heterogeneity and kinetics through advanced spectral analysis. Biochar 7, 116 (2025).   https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-025-00522-7   

 

=== 

About Biochar

Biochar is the first journal dedicated exclusively to biochar research, spanning agronomy, environmental science, and materials science. It publishes original studies on biochar production, processing, and applications—such as bioenergy, environmental remediation, soil enhancement, climate mitigation, water treatment, and sustainability analysis. The journal serves as an innovative and professional platform for global researchers to share advances in this rapidly expanding field. 

Follow us on FacebookX, and Bluesky.