Friday, November 07, 2025

‘Against Humanity’: Leaders Denounce Fossil Fuel-Loving Trump as He Skips Out on Global Climate Summit

“Every fraction of a degree means more hunger, displacement, and loss—especially for those least responsible,” said UN Secretary General António Guterres on Thursday. “This is moral failure—and deadly negligence.”


(L-R) Chile’s President Gabriel Boric, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Antonio Guterres, Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, and the Governor of the state of Para, Helder Barbalho, attend the family photo during the Leaders Summit, ahead of the COP30 UN climate conference in Belem, Para State, Brazil, on November 7, 2025.
(Photo by Mauro Pimentel/AFP)

Stephen Prager
Nov 07, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

As world leaders gathered in Brazil for this year’s global summit on the accelerating climate crisis this week, many took note of the absence of US President Donald Trump.

This year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) summit comes on the tenth anniversary of the Paris Climate agreement, in which nations committed to adopting policies intended to keep global temperature increases below the threshold of 1.5°C above preindustrial levels, considered a tipping point at which many of the worst ravages of climate change will become irreversible.

Ten years later, progress has fallen far short of the mark, with leaders scrambling to keep the deal’s goals intact—an aim that is likely untenable without the cooperation of the US, the globe’s largest historical emitter of carbon.

America’s president has not only once again pulled the US out of the Paris agreement, but also sought to turn climate denial into public policy and spent his term in office thus far grinding American investment in renewable energy to a halt—actions viewed as extraordinary abdications of responsibility at a time when the globe is ever more rapidly approaching the point of no return for warming.

Fresh on climate advocates’ minds are Trump’s comments at the UN General Assembly in September, when he described climate change as the world’s “greatest con job.”

On Thursday, the World Meteorological Organization found that greenhouse gas emissions had reached a record high. Meanwhile, 2025 is on track to be the third hottest year on record, behind only 2024 and 2023.

“Every fraction of a degree means more hunger, displacement, and loss—especially for those least responsible,” said UN Secretary-General António Guterres on Thursday. “This is moral failure—and deadly negligence.”

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who has emerged as one of the world’s leading climate defenders from the heart of the Amazon rainforest, began the conference by delivering an indirect but unmistakable shot at Trump. He denounced the “extremist forces that fabricate fake news and are condemning future generations to life on a planet altered forever by global warming.”

Other Latin American leaders were more direct. Colombian President Gustavo Petro, whom Trump recently hit with sanctions and threatened with military action, denounced the US president as “against humanity,” as evidenced by “his absence” at the conference.

“The president of the United States at the latest United Nations General Assembly said the climate crisis does not exist,” added Chilean President Gabriel Boric. “That is a lie.”

In Trump’s stead, over 100 other state and local figures from US politics have traveled to Brazil to take part in the conference: Among them are California Gov. Gavin NewsomNew Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, and Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers.

Another attendee is Phoenix Mayor Kate Gallego, chair of the Climate Mayors network, who recently applauded Tuesday night’s elections in the US. More than 40 candidates associated with the network came out victorious, as well as the self-described ecosocialist New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani.

“Our climate mayors did very well on the ballot,” Gallego said to applause at a local leaders forum for COP30. “We want to send this message from the US.”

But despite the US delegation, even with officials from the Trump administration absent, climate campaigners fear the White House may still seek to sabotage the conference from afar. Last month, the administration did just that when it used the threat of tariffs to strong-arm countries into killing what would have been a global-first carbon fee on shipping.

Even without Trump present, COP30 is crawling with fossil fuel lobbyists seeking to stymie progress. A report released Friday from the climate advocacy group Kick Big Polluters Out found that over 5,350 fossil fuel lobbyists have attended UN climate negotiations over the past four years. The corporations they represent are responsible for more than 60% of global emissions.

“These companies have defended their fossil interests by watering down climate action for years,” said Fiona Hauke of the German environmental group Urgewald. “As we head towards COP30, we demand transparency and accountability: Keep polluters out of climate talks and make them pay for a just energy transition.”

At COP30, nations target the jet set with luxury flight tax


By AFP
November 7, 2025


Rooted in the idea that a small elite of premium flyers should pay more for their outsized contribution to global warming, the proposal will likely pit them against the powerful aviation industry - Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File Kevin Dietsch

Julien MIVIELLE

France, Spain and Kenya are among a group of countries spearheading a drive at the COP30 climate summit for a new tax on luxury air travel, a source close to the matter told AFP.

Rooted in the idea that a small elite of premium flyers should pay more for their outsized contribution to global warming, the proposal will likely pit them against the powerful aviation industry.

Diplomats from the coalition of more than 10 countries are pushing for more to come aboard.

“We want to expand the coalition and, in particular, bring in more European states,” the source said.

Business and first-class seats carry roughly triple the planet-warming emissions footprint of an economy ticket, while private jets emit up to 14 times more per passenger-kilometre compared to commercial flights.

Countries that do not yet have such a tax would commit to imposing levies on business and first-class tickets as well as private jets.

Those that already do — such as France — are pledging greater ambition, with steeper and more progressive rates. In practice, that could mean a dedicated surcharge on first-class travel.

For private jets, the tax could be tied to kerosene consumption, though other mechanisms are under discussion.

The initiative is led by the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force, a group launched in 2023 and co-chaired by Barbados, Kenya and France.

They have chosen COP30, held in Brazil’s Belem and billed as a moment for nations to move from climate pledges to action, as the runway to launch their proposal.

– ‘It’s only fair’ –

“We need innovative and fair financing,” French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday at a leaders’ summit ahead of COP30, which officially kicks off Monday.

“With Kenya, Spain, Somalia, Benin, Sierra Leone, and Antigua and Barbuda, we have made significant progress toward a greater contribution from the aviation sector to adaptation,” he said. This group of countries also includes Djibouti and South Sudan.

“It’s only fair that those who have the most, and therefore pollute the most, pay their fair share,” Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said Friday.

The move is likely to face headwinds from airlines, including Air France, which in March unveiled a new version of its “La Premiere” cabin — the first update since 2014.

Designed for long-haul Boeing 777s, the “suites” will feature five windows, an armchair and a chaise longue that converts into a bed.

Proponents of the tax believe that demand for ultra-luxury travel is only weakly affected by price, and that the ultra-wealthy will keep flying even if tickets become slightly more expensive.

“Properly designed aviation taxes can raise predictable revenue for climate and development finance, while reinforcing fairness and solidarity,” argues the coalition of countries, in a new document explaining the rationale.

Supporters cite the Maldives as an example. The tourism-dependent island nation charges steep departure taxes: $120 for business class, $240 for first class and $480 for private jets.

“There’s no reason why other countries can’t do the same,” the source told AFP.


Army of 5,000+ Fossil Fuel Lobbyists Has ‘Stranglehold on Climate Action’ at COP30: Report

“We must dismantle the corporate architecture of impunity and kick these big polluters out of policymaking,” said one campaigner. “Our future cannot be written by those who profit from its destruction.”


Activists demand exclusion of fossil fuel lobbyists and other big polluters from United Nations climate talks in Bonn, Germany on June 18, 2025.
(Photo by Kick Big Polluters Out)

Brett Wilkins
Nov 07, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

Big polluters led by the fossil fuel industry—which knowingly caused the climate crisis—are expanding their outsize presence and influence at the key event meant to tackle the planetary emergency, a report published ahead of this month’s United Nations Climate Change Conference in Brazil revealed.

The report, published Friday by the Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO) coalition, notes that “over 5,350 fossil fuel lobbyists have attended UN climate negotiations in just four years, with 90 of the corporations they represent responsible for nearly 60% of all global oil and gas production.”

The analysis sounds the alarm on the “staggering scale of fossil fuel industry presence at the very negotiations that must urgently phase out their products” in order to meet the goal of keeping global temperature rise below 1.5°C as promised in the landmark 2015 Paris Agreement.

The world is failing to deliver upon that promise, and according to the report, “the primary reason for this failure is no secret—big polluters continue to be granted outsized presence, access, and influence at the very negotiations meant to address the crisis they knowingly caused.”

“COP30 is set to proceed with effectively zero protections against interference in place.”

“Among the world’s largest fossil fuel corporations, Shell sent a total of 37 lobbyists to COP26-COP29, BP sent 36, ExxonMobil sent 32, and Chevron sent 20,” according to KBPO. “These figures do not account for additional lobbyists from the fossil fuel industry’s associated trade groups.”

“As a result, they maintain a carefully orchestrated stranglehold on climate action, which consequently continues to fall way short of the strong and just global response we know we urgently need,” the report states.

KBPO warned: “Despite the scale of fossil fuel industry presence revealed by this data, COP30 is set to proceed with effectively zero protections against interference in place. Ahead of COP30 happening in Belém from November 10-21, more than 225 organizations and networks around the world wrote to the COP30 presidency asking them to commit to a polluter-free COP by ensuring no fossil fuel ties or sponsorship and by advancing an Accountability Framework that protects the integrity and legitimacy of the [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change].

“In response,” the report’s authors lamented, “little to no meaningful action has been taken to protect these talks from the fossil fuel industry and other big polluters.”

KBPO partner Fiona Hauke of Urgewald, an environmental and human rights advocacy group based in Germany, said in a statement Friday that “over the last three years, oil and gas companies that lobbied at COP have spent more than $35 billion each year looking for new oil and gas fields, exacerbating the problem the nations of the world had gathered to solve.”

“These companies have defended their fossil interests by watering down climate action for years,” Hauke added. “As we head towards COP30, we demand transparency and accountability: Keep polluters out of climate talks and make them pay for a just energy transition.”

Nerisha Baldevu, a KBPO member from groundWork/Friends of the Earth South Africa, asserted: “Corporate power is at the root of the climate crisis. Fossil, mining, and agribusiness giants are seizing our global institutions and turning climate negotiations into trade expos for polluters.”

“For climate justice, we must dismantle the corporate architecture of impunity and kick these big polluters out of policymaking,” Baldevu stressed. “Our future cannot be written by those who profit from its destruction.”

Nations’ Climate Plans Could Cause 2.5°C of Warming, Imperiling ‘Livable Future’


“Years of grossly insufficient action from richer nations and continued climate deception and obstruction by fossil fuel interests are directly responsible for bringing us here,” one expert said.


An aerial view shows cars and damaged property in a flooded section of road from Holland Bamboo to Middle Quarters in St. Elizabeth, Jamaica, on October 31, 2025, in the aftermath of Hurricane Melissa.
(Photo by Ricardo Makyn/AFP via Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Nov 04, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

United Nations assessment released Tuesday—less than a week before the UN Climate Change Conference summit in Brazil—warns that countries’ latest pledges to cut greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris Agreement could push global temperatures to 2.3-2.5°C above preindustrial levels, up to a full degree beyond the treaty’s primary goal.

A decade after that agreement was finalized, only about a third of state parties submitted new plans, officially called Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), for the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Emissions Gap Report 2025: Off Target.
RECOMMENDED...


Ahead of COP30, UN Report Shows 1.5°C Will Be Breached as Countries Pledge Just 10% Emissions Cut

While the updated NDCs—if fully implemented—would be a slight improvement on the 2.6-2.8°C projection in last year’s report, the more ambitious Paris target is to limit global temperature rise this century to 1.5°C. Already, the world is beginning to experience what that looks like: Last year was the hottest on record and the first in which the global average temperature exceeded 1.5°C, relative to preindustrial times.

As with those findings, UNEP’s report sparked calls for bold action at COP30 in Belém next week, including from UN Secretary-General António Guterres. He noted that “scientists tell us that a temporary overshoot above 1.5°C is now inevitable—starting, at the latest, in the early 2030s. And the path to a livable future gets steeper by the day.”

“1.5°C by the end of the century remains our North Star. And the science is clear: This goal is still within reach.”

“But this is no reason to surrender,” Guterres argued. “It’s a reason to step up and speed up. 1.5°C by the end of the century remains our North Star. And the science is clear: This goal is still within reach. But only if we meaningfully increase our ambition.”

UNEP Executive Director Inger Andersen also stressed that while inadequate climate policies have created the conditions in which now “we still need unprecedented emissions cuts in an increasingly tight window, with an increasingly challenging geopolitical backdrop,” reaching the Paris goal “is still possible—just.”

“Proven solutions already exist. From the rapid growth in cheap renewable energy to tackling methane emissions, we know what needs to be done,” she said. “Now is the time for countries to go all in and invest in their future with ambitious climate action—action that delivers faster economic growth, better human health, more jobs, energy security, and resilience.”



Climate campaigners responded with similar statements. Savio Carvalho, head of regions at the global advocacy group 350.orgsaid that “this report confirms what millions already feel in their daily lives: Governments are still failing to deliver on their promises. The window to keep 1.5°C within reach is closing fast, but it is not yet gone.”

“All eyes are now on Belém,” Carvalho declared. “COP30 must be a turning point, where leaders stop making excuses, phase out fossil fuels, and scale up renewable energy in a way that is fast, fair, and equitable.”

Rachel Cleetus, senior policy director for the Climate and Energy Program at the US-based Union of Concerned Scientists, said that “this report’s findings, confirming that a crucial science-based benchmark for limiting dangerous climate change is about to be breached, are alarming, enraging, and heartbreaking.”

“Years of grossly insufficient action from richer nations and continued climate deception and obstruction by fossil fuel interests are directly responsible for bringing us here,” she highlighted. “World leaders still have the power to act decisively to sharply rein in heat-trapping emissions and any other choice would be an unconscionable dereliction of their responsibility to humanity.”

Cleetus—a regular attendee of the annual UN climate talks who will be at COP30, unlike President Donald Trump’s administration—continued:
Costly and deadly climate impacts are already widespread and will worsen with every fraction of a degree, harming people’s health and well-being, as well as the economy. Policymakers must seize the opportunity now to accelerate deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency—solutions that are plentiful, clean, and affordable—and transition away from polluting fossil fuels. Protecting people, livelihoods, and ecosystems by helping them adapt to climate hazards is also critical as higher temperatures unleash rapidly worsening heat, floods, storms, wildfiresdrought, and sea-level rise.

Ambitious climate action can cut energy costs, improve public health, and create a myriad of economic opportunities. Richer, high-emitting countries’ continued failure to tackle the challenge head-on is undermining the well-being of their own people and is a monumental injustice toward lower-income countries that have contributed the least to this problem yet bear the most acute harms. It’s past time for wealthy countries to heed the latest science and pay up for their role in fueling the climate crisis. With alarms blaring, the upcoming UN climate talks must be a turning point in global climate action. Powerful politicians and billionaires who willfully ignore urgent realities and continue to delay, distract, or lie about climate change will have to answer to our children and grandchildren.


Jean Su, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s Energy Justice Program, also plans to attend COP30.

“This report shows Earth’s livable future hanging in the balance while Trump tells climate diplomacy to go to hell,” she said. “The US exit from Paris threatens to cancel out any climate gains from other countries. The rise of petro-authoritarianism in the US shouldn’t be an excuse for other countries to backpedal on their own commitments. This report sends alarm bells to rich countries with a conscience to exercise real leadership and lead a fossil fuel phaseout to protect us all.”

The UNEP report was released on the same day that the German environmental rights group Urgewald published its Global Oil and Gas Exit List, which shows that a green transition is being undercut by fossil fuel extraction and production.

Other publications put out in the lead-up to COP30 include an Oxfam International report showing that the wealthiest people on the planet are disproportionately fueling the climate emergency, as well as a UN Food and Agriculture Organization analysis warning that human-induced land degradation “is undermining agricultural productivity and threatening ecosystem health worldwide.”

There have also been mounting demands for specific action, such as Greenpeace and 350.org urging governments to pay for climate action in part by taxing the ultrarich, and an open letter signed by advocacy organizations, activists, policymakers, artists, and experts urging world leaders to prioritize health during discussions in Brazil next week.

As Common Dreams reported earlier Tuesday, COP30 Special Envoy for Health Ethel Maciel said that “this letter sends an unequivocal message that health is an essential component of climate action.”

OECD raises alarm about slow pace of climate action

06.11.2025, DPA


Photo: Britta Pedersen/dpa-Zentralbild/dpa



The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is alarmed by a lack of ambition in tackling climate change and fears severe economic consequences.

Climate-related disasters have already caused rising social and economic costs, with damages exceeding €285 billion ($328 billion) and 16,000 registered deaths worldwide in 2024, the Paris-based OECD reported on Thursday.

Global measures to tackle climate change remain inadequate, it said. Stricter political measures, faster implementation and legally binding actions are urgently required to close the delivery gaps between ambitions and actual outcomes, the OECD said in its Climate Action Monitor 2025.

Climate action stagnating

Global measures to tackle climate change increased by only 1% in 2024, continuing the decline observed since 2021.

This can no longer be explained by the Covid-19 pandemic or the subsequent economic crisis but reflects a loss of momentum in implementing effective political measures, the OECD stated.

There is clear evidence of a global implementation gap in climate action, it said.

The costs of this inaction are rising, with increasing economic losses, social inequalities and looming environmental damage, warned the OECD.

It is not enough to merely formulate more ambitious goals, countries must also ensure that their commitments are translated into concrete actions, it said.

Climate targets hard to achieve

Currently, countries are not on the right track to meet their existing commitments, the OECD report showed.

Given the continuing rise in emissions and waning levels of climate action, the world remains far from achieving both the 2030 targets and the longer-term goal of climate neutrality, the OECD noted in its report.

EU environment agency reports 2.5% fall in emissions ahead of COP30

06.11.2025  DPA


Photo: Steffen Trumpf/dpa

Greenhouse gas emissions from European Union countries fell by 2.5% last year, continuing a long-term decline, the European Environment Agency (EEA) reported before the start of the UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Brazil next week.

"Now halfway between the start of this century and 2050, the EU is largely on track towards climate neutrality," the EEA said. The aim is to cut emissions by 55% from 1990 levels.

"Fundamental changes in the energy system, technological innovation in industry and greater public awareness have together driven a 39% reduction in emissions by 2024 compared with 1990 levels," the Copenhagen-based body added.

The 27 EU states were on track to achieve a cut of 54% by 2030, provided that current and planned measures were fully implemented, the EEA predicted.

The EU has set a target to become climate neutral by 2050.

This week, member states agreed to cut emissions by 90% by 2040 compared with 1990 levels.

The new target is a compromise, allowing five percentage points of the reduction to be achieved through international offsets under agreements with non-European countries. The European Parliament still needs to approve the deal.

The largest reductions were in the energy sector, as in previous years, with renewables taking over from fossil fuels. Smaller cutbacks were recorded in agriculture, construction and refuse disposal.

Slight rises were posted in industry and in national and international transport, and the EEA noted that sales of electric cars had declined in 2024.

"These patterns confirm that while some sectors are transforming rapidly, others must accelerate - or even reverse - their current trends," it said.


UN's Guterres: Missing 1.5 degree goal a catastrophic 'moral failure'

06.11.2025, DPA


Photo: Kay Nietfeld/dpa


By Torsten Holtz and Larissa Schwedes, dpa

The world has failed to keep warming within the critical 1.5 degrees Celsius limit set under the 2015 Paris Agreement, UN Secretary General António Guterres said on Thursday, calling it "a moral failure" and "deadly negligence."

Guterres said it is "inevitable" that the 1.5-degree threshold will be breached by the early 2030s due to humanity's continued reliance on fossil fuels.

"Every fraction of a degree higher means more hunger, more displacement, more economic hardship, and more lives and ecosystems lost," he said in Belém, Brazil, a city in the Amazon rainforest hosting the UN Climate Change Conference (COP30).

He demanded that governments speed up the renewable energy transition and stop the approval of "new coal plants and new oil and gas exploration or expansion."

He also urged governments to honor their pledge to halt global deforestation by 2030, describing the current response to the climate crisis as "fall far short of what is needed."

'Red line for humanity'

Guterres said the world is heading toward 2.8 degrees of warming this century under current policies. Yet he insisted the Paris target remains achievable if countries act decisively.

"Let us be clear: the 1.5 degree limit is a red line for humanity," he said. But, Guterres added, breaching it could yet amount to "temporary overshoot" that could then come back down.

"If we act now, at great speed and scale, we can make the overshoot as small, as short, and as safe as possible – and bring temperatures back below 1.5 degrees before the end of the century."

He blasted governments for continuing to channel vast subsidies into the oil, gas and coal industries, saying billions were being spent "on lobbying, deceiving the public and obstructing progress."

Leaders gather in Brazil ahead of COP30

Gutterres spoke as world leaders arrived for a summit in Belém on Thursday and Friday. Following their departure, the COP30 negotiations will officially get under way on Monday.

European leaders including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer are among those attending. Senior officials from the European Union and the United Nations will also be present.

Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said he hopes the two-week event will produce tangible results. More than 70,000 participants from about 200 countries are expected.

The political backdrop is challenging: wars, economic uncertainty and fiscal strains are overshadowing climate efforts, while the United States under Donald Trump continues to expand its fossil fuel agenda. Washington will not send a high-level delegation to COP30.

On Thursday, leaders are set to launch a multibillion-dollar fund to protect tropical forests — the “green lungs” of the planet — and issue a joint call for stronger global wildfire management.

The summit will also promote Brazil’s sustainable fuels initiative, which aims to quadruple production and use by 2035, and unveil a declaration linking efforts to combat hunger and poverty with climate protection.

According to the WWF, nearly 7 million hectares of primary forest were lost in 2024 alone, despite a 2019 pledge by 140 countries to end deforestation by the end of this decade.

Lula calls for renewed commitment to Paris goals

Ten years after the Paris Agreement, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva urged the international community not to abandon its climate targets, warning of severe human and material losses if global warming is not contained.

"The COP30 will be the COP of truth," Lula told the leaders gathered in Belém. He noted that it was the first time a COP summit was being held in the Amazon — "the greatest symbol of the environmental cause," home to thousands of species of plants and animals.

Lula called for greater "courage and determination" in tackling global warming. "It is time to take the warnings of science seriously," he said, adding that the climate crisis can only be solved through global justice.

"Climate justice is an ally in the fight against hunger and poverty," the leftist politician said.

Hosting COP30 in the Amazon, Lula said, underscores Brazil's effort to balance economic development with environmental protection. "The people of the Amazon are now rightly asking what the rest of the world is doing to prevent the collapse of their home," he said.

Brazil's Lula presents fund to save tropical forests ahead of COP30

07.11.2025  DPA

Photo: Mauro Pimentel/PA Wire/dpa

By Philipp Paul Znidar and Torsten Holtz, dpa

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Thursday presented a new multibillion-dollar fund to protect tropical forests, as world leaders convened in the Amazonian city of Belém ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) next week.

Lula said that for the first time, countries in the Global South will take a leading role in a forest protection programme through the new Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF).

The Brazilian government's model would ensure countries that preserve their tropical forests are rewarded financially.

The fund could distribute up to $4 billion annually, almost three times the current volume of international aid for forest preservation.

Countries that preserve valuable tropical forests are to receive a premium of $4 per hectare per year from the fund.

Conversely, they will have to pay a penalty of $140 for every hectare destroyed, with verification carried out by using satellite images. 

According to the plan, some 70 developing countries with tropical forests could benefit. Up to a fifth of the funds would also go to indigenous populations.

Rich countries would initially contribute $25 billion on a voluntary basis.

Potential donors include Germany, the United Arab Emirates, France, Norway and the United Kingdom. This initial fund would then be used to mobilize a further $100 billion from the private sector over the next few years.

In addition to Brazil, the founding members include Colombia, Ghana, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia and Malaysia.

Lula announced at the UN General Debate in New York that Brazil itself would contribute $1 billion.

Greenpeace: Fund must not invest in harmful industries

Greenpeace has praised the initiative as an important political signal. However, it said there was room for improvement.

For example, it must be ensured that the fund is not allowed to invest in industries that are harmful to nature and the climate in order to achieve high returns.

That would be counterproductive, said Greenpeace expert Jannes Stoppel. In addition, COP30 must also adopt a binding forest action plan to stop deforestation by 2030, the organization said.

Guterres: Missing 1.5 degree goal a 'moral failure'

Lula's speech came hours after UN Secretary General António Guterres called the world's failure to keep warming within the critical 1.5 degrees Celsius limit set under the 2015 Paris Agreement "a moral failure" and "deadly negligence."

Guterres said it is "inevitable" that the 1.5-degree threshold will be breached by the early 2030s due to humanity's continued reliance on fossil fuels.


Leaders turn up the heat on fossil fuels at Amazon climate summit

Belém (Brazil) (AFP) – World leaders will meet for a second day of climate talks in the Brazilian Amazon on Friday after fiery speeches and renewed criticism of Big Oil marked the opening session.


Issued on: 07/11/2025 - FRANCE24

France's President Emmanuel Macron and Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva wave after a bilateral meeting within the framework of the COP30 UN climate conference in Belem, Para State, Brazil on November 6, 2025 © Pablo PORCIUNCULA / AFP

Dozens of ministers and several heads of state and government, including those of Spain, Germany and Namibia, will meet in Belem just before the United Nations' (UN) annual two-week conference, COP30, which starts on Monday.

Evidence of the climate crisis, driven largely by the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation, has never been clearer: the past 11 years have been the hottest on record and marked by intensifying hurricanes, heat waves and wildfires.

UN chief Antonio Guterres and a series of national leaders said on Thursday that the world will fail to keep global warming below 1.5C, the Paris Agreement's primary target set a decade ago, but said they have not yet given up on its fallback goal of 2C.

The absence of leaders from the world's biggest polluters, including the United States, where President Donald Trump has dismissed climate science as a "con job," cast a shadow over talks, but also catalyzed calls for greater mobilization.

Countries made an unprecedented pledge to "transition away" from oil, gas and coal at COP28 in Dubai two years ago.

However, the issue has since slipped down the agenda as nations grapple with economic pressures, trade disputes and wars, and the Trump administration aggressively pushing for more fossil fuels.

'Roadmap' calls praised

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's call in his opening address for a "roadmap" to halt deforestation, reduce dependence on fossil fuels, and mobilize the financial resources needed to achieve those goals was met with applause.

The coalition backing Lula's call includes European nations and numerous small island states whose very survival is threatened by stronger cyclones and rising sea levels.

Gaston Browne, the prime minister of Antigua and Barbuda, railed against the "large polluters (who) continue to deliberately destroy our marine and terrestrial environments with their poisonous fossil fuel gases."

The idea of phasing out hydrocarbons is also gaining traction in Europe. Despite their divisions, EU countries noted that they have reduced greenhouse gas emissions for more than three decades and are aiming for a 90 percent cut by 2040.

"COP30 must send a clear message that the green transition is here to stay, and that fossil fuels have no future," said Finnish President Alexander Stubb.

Marta Salomon of the Brazilian think tank Politicas Climaticas do Instituto Talanoa told AFP: "When the president talks about a roadmap to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, we understand it as a favorable sign for this discussion to take place during COP."

Lula had already hinted at his plan in an interview this week with AFP and other outlets, though he cautioned "it's not easy" to reduce fossil fuels.

Indeed, Brazil has just authorized its state oil company to begin offshore exploration in the Amazon.

A formal anti-fossil fuel decision in Belem is seen as highly unlikely, given the requirement for consensus among nearly 200 countries attending the conference.

Still, COP30 will put a spotlight on countries' voluntary pledges and their implementation, which could lead to fresh announcements on methane -- a "super pollutant" and the main component of natural gas, prone to leaking from pipelines and installations.

"The world must pull the methane brake," said Mia Mottley, prime minister of Barbados and a highly respected voice in global climate diplomacy.

© 2025 AFP

Caught between saving forests and drilling for oil, COP30 puts Lula’s contradictions on display



Despite Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s much-vaunted ambitions to lead the fight against climate change and the deforestation that has ravaged the Amazon, Lula continues to look to the country’s oil industry to build Brazil’s wealth. He argues that the money generated from oil exports will help finance the country’s accelerating transition to cleaner energy.



Issued on: 07/11/2025 
FRANCE24
By: Cyrielle CABOT

Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva speaks during an event to announce investments in oil and gas industry at Duque de Caxias refinery (REDUC) of Brazilian energy company Petrobras, in Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, July 4, 2025. © Maura Pimentel, AFP

Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has worked hard to cultivate a reputation as a staunch defender of the climate. Speaking at his 2023 inauguration, Lula promised to turn his country into “a leader in the fight against the climate crisis”.

And there have been some notable successes: last month, Amazon deforestation hit an 11-year low.

These lofty ambitions will be on full display as Brazil prepares to host the COP30 climate summit in the port city of Belem on the edge of the sprawling Amazon.

But barely three weeks earlier, Brazil's majority state-owned oil giant Petrobas announced that it had received approval to drill exploratory oil wells at the mouth of the Amazon River. The decision had many environmental activists criticising this apparent paradox at the heart of Lula’s climate policy.

“Brazil's presidency of COP30 is hypocritical, as it claims to want to raise climate ambitions while granting a new oil exploration license to its national company,” said Fanny Petitbon, France director of the 350.org clean energy NGO.

“It's completely mind-boggling.”

Brazilian activists were also quick to condemn the decision.

“The approval is an act of sabotage against the COP and undermines the climate leadership claimed by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva,” the country's Climate Observatory said in a statement.

What's on the agenda for COP30?

Un cartel anunciando la próxima Cumbre Climática COP30 de la ONU se encuentra fuera del centro de prensa en Belém, estado de Pará, Brasil, el martes 4 de noviembre de 2025. AP - Eraldo Peres
04:55



Black gold

Petrobas has for decades been eyeing this stretch of water in what’s known as the Equatorial Margin, some 500 kilometres from the mouth of the Amazon River. And with good reason – like similar swaths of territory off the coasts of neighbouring Suriname and Guyana, it holds vast reserves of oil. Brazilian authorities estimate that the black gold buried beneath these waters could bring in €46 billion and create more than 350,000 new jobs.

Although the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) has long baulked at the project, it finally gave its approval after what it described as a “rigorous process” with “more than 65 technical consultations”.


Climate action in a fractured world: Is there a will 'to cooperate in a world full of conflict'?
© France 24
07:24



But the project is far from risk-free, either for the region’s biodiversity or the communities living along the coast. In a technical report published by Brazilian daily Folha de São Paulo, IBAMA found that the drilling could have dire repercussions for the manatees that call the coast home – mammals that are already facing the risk of extinction.

The region is also home to the largest expanse of mangroves in the world – a fragile ecosystem that Brazil Journal said is also threatened by the project. The Equatorial Margin’s coast also harbours three Indigenous lands and six quilombola territories – peopled by the descendants of African slaves – as well as countless fishing villages that would be the first to bear the brunt of any oil spills or other industrial accidents.
Up in smoke

So why was such a project approved under a self-proclaimed climate defender such as Lula?

“This sums up the duality of the Brazilian president, caught between economic and ecological interests,” said Catherine Aubertin, research director at France's Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations.

With an average of 3.4 million barrels produced every day in 2024, Brazil is the world’s eighth-largest oil exporter. In 2024, crude oil became the country’s chief export, overtaking soybeans and making up 13.3 percent of Brazil’s total exports.

Speaking last year at COP29 in Azerbaijan – another major crude oil producer – Lula said he wanted to continue to increase Brazil’s oil exports to 36 percent by 2035.


Global South charting a greener future with climate solutions sparking economic growth
© France 24
05:41


There’s just one problem. According to projections, Brazil’s oil production will begin to decline from 2030 onwards as its current reserves are depleted. It’s a prognosis that has set off something of a panic in the upper ranks of the Brazilian government as well as the halls of Petrobas.

“The Equatorial Margin is the future of Brazil's energy sovereignty,” Energy Minister Alexandre Silveira wrote in a social media post. “We are ensuring that exploration is carried out with environmental responsibility, in accordance with the highest international standards, generating benefits for the Brazilian people.”

But climate scientists and activists agree that the time for looking for new oil reserves is over. Instead, they say, moving away from fossil fuels – the leading emitters of greenhouse gases – is crucial if humanity is to slow the world’s warming.

READ MOREWorld leaders to rally in support of climate action before COP30 summit

According to a Climate Observatory analysis, emissions released by Brazil’s energy sector are likely to rise from 490.6 million tonnes to 558 million tonnes of CO2 by 2050. It’s a far cry from the country’s ambitious promise to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 67 percent to 59 percent by the same year.

“It’s a contradiction that the Brazilian president is more or less owning up to,” Aubertin said. “He responds to it by repeating the same argument as other large oil producers: he supports the idea that oil revenue is used to finance the energy transition.”

“Is it contradictory? It is,” Lula conceded in a June 2024 interview with Brazilian radio CBN. “But as long as the energy transition isn’t solving our problem, Brazil needs to make money from this oil.”
Saving the forests

Aubertin stressed that Lula’s track record on climate change is more nuanced than the president’s oil ambitions make it seem.

“Even though Brazil is exporting its oil, it has still reached a very good level in terms of [the sustainability of] its internal energy consumption,” she said. “Eighty-nine percent of its electricity production comes from renewable energy.”

The Brazilian president has also undertaken a range of actions to make good on his climate commitments, Aubertin said. Since 2023, Lula has put in place a national energy transition policy with investment potential of up to €330 billion as well as ratifying a law creating a mandatory carbon market.

But his main victory in the fight to protect the environment has taken place on a different front: the fight against deforestation. Since coming to office, Lula has championed the struggle against illegal logging as one of the most critical goals of his presidency.

READ MOREBrazil's Lula urges less talk, more action at COP30 climate meet

He brought back Marina Silva as environment minister, who had already managed to drastically lower the rate of deforestation during Lula’s first two terms (2003-2010). At the same time, the Brazilian president reactivated the Amazon Fund, an international financial mechanism designed to raise money in the fight against deforestation, strengthened regulations and stiffened penalties for illegal logging.

In just two years, the results have been spectacular. Although deforestation affected more than 10,000 square kilometres in 2022, the last year of far-right president Jair Bolsonaro’s term in office, Brazil’s deforestation had been halved by 2023 and continued to fall to close to 4,200 square kilometres in 2024. Outside of the nation’s massive rainforests, deforestation levels also fell in other vulnerable ecosystems such as the Cerrado, the biodiverse savanna south of the Amazon.

READ MOREBrazil records biggest annual fall in emissions in 15 years: report

“Deforestation is mainly due to infrastructure construction and agricultural expansion, whether legal or illegal,” said Erin Matson, a consultant at Climate Focus and the author of a comprehensive report published in mid-October on the state of the world's forests.

“Brazil's excellent results show that simply strengthening controls can quickly and drastically reduce deforestation.”

“In the long term, curbing deforestation will only be possible through profound changes to our economic model, as pressure on forests continues to increase in line with global demand for soy, wood and paper,” she added. “But Brazil provides a very good example of how, when a head of state takes action, results can be achieved.”
A president ‘bound hand and foot’

“Lula acts with the leverage that he has,” Aubertin said. With Brazil's Congress dominated by conservatives keen on continued investment in petrol and representatives of agribusiness still carrying significant weight in the halls of power, “he is bound hand and foot and has to deal with a lot of pressures – sometimes contradictory ones”.

Perhaps because of this, Brazil’s agribusiness sector, which is responsible for 30.5 percent of the country's greenhouse gas emissions, seems to have remained untouched by any environmental measures that would cut into its profit margins.

The industry managed to avoid the application of the carbon market law thanks to the support of the Parliamentary Agricultural Front, a powerful legislative bloc that often advocates for the agribusiness industry.

As COP30 begins, it remains to be seen just how Brazil's climate contradictions will be reflected in negotiations. True to form, the Brazilian president seems to have carefully sidestepped the awkward issue of fossil fuels for the moment.

Lula has already made it clear that protecting forests will take pride of place in COP30. He has said he hopes that one of the summit’s major advances will be the adoption of the Tropical Forest Forever Facilities, a new financial mechanism that would compensate countries for preserving their tropical forests – and which advocates say is as a much-needed weapon in the bitter fight against deforestation.

This article has been adapted from the original in French.
US officials, NGOs cry foul as Washington snubs UN rights review

By AFP
November 7, 2025


The seats of the US delegates were empty in Geneva in September after US President Donald Trump withdrew from United Nations bodies including the Human Rights Council
 - Copyright AFP Fabrice COFFRINI

Nina LARSON

US officials and rights defenders gathered at the United Nations in Geneva on Friday to voice concerns over human rights under President Donald Trump’s administration, and denounce Washington’s decision to snub a review of its record.

The US mission in Geneva confirmed this week that the country would skip its so-called Universal Periodic Review (UPR), after first announcing the decision in August, becoming only the second country to ever boycott the process.

All 193 United Nations member states are required to undergo the standard review of their rights situation every four to five years.

The decision “is deeply disappointing,” Uzra Zeya, head of Human Rights First, said in an email.

“It sends the wrong message and weakens a process that has helped drive progress on human rights worldwide — including in the United States.”

Zeya was to host one of several events at the UN in Geneva featuring activists and elected US officials voicing concerns around rights in the United States, in particular since Trump returned to power in January.

The US decision to snub its review was linked to Trump’s order in February withdrawing the country from a number of UN bodies, including participation in the Human Rights Council.

But dropping the UPR was not a given. Trump also withdrew from the council during his first term, but his administration still opted to take part in its 2020 review.

The US under Trump especially has repeatedly slammed the council for being biased against Israel, and has cited that alleged bias as prompting its withdrawal from the review.

– ‘Tragic’ –


The move “really, really undermines … the notion that international human rights law is inalienable and applies equally to all,” warned Phil Lynch, head of the International Service for Human Rights.

He was speaking at an event in a room of the UN’s European headquarters where former US first lady Eleanor Roosevelt helped draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights before its adoption in 1948.

“It’s tragic and deeply ironic that we helped to create the norms as well as this (UPR) process that we are now backing out of,” a former senior US official told AFP, asking not to be named.

Another former US official who worked on the country’s previous UPR engagements warned the move was a “dangerous” signal.

“We’re losing our legitimacy globally on human rights leadership… It’s a hard pill to swallow.”

The US absence sparked outrage among civil society, which typically participates in reviews, providing analysis and recommendations.

Denied the UPR platform, numerous groups, academics and local US officials were nonetheless intent on making their concerns known.

They listed a string of alarming developments, including repression of dissent, militarised immigration crackdowns, national guards sent into US cities, crackdowns on universities and art institutions, and lethal strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific.

– Need for ‘sunlight’ –

Many urged the international community to speak out and support their work to hold the US government in check.

“It’s the Human Rights Council, the United Nations system and a community of nations committed to human rights and democracy who can bring necessary sunlight to these abuses,” said Chandra Bhatnagar, head of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)’s southern California branch.

Robert Saleem Holbrook, head of the Abolitionist Law Center agreed, insisting that as “we see our civil liberties being decimated, these forums are going to take on increasing importance in the future”.

The United States is set to become one of the only two countries to fail to show up for their own review since the inception of the UPR system in 2008.

While some countries have requested postponements, only Israel has previously been a no-show, in early 2013, although it eventually underwent a postponed review 10 months later.

Observers warned the US absence could serve as a bad example.

“We hope this doesn’t risk normalising withdrawal from the council,” Sanjay Sethi, co-head of the Artistic Freedom Initiative, told AFP.