Tuesday, December 02, 2025

 

Overreliance on AI risks eroding new and future doctors’ critical thinking while reinforcing existing bias




Tools already widely used amid few institutional policies and regulatory guidance; Medical education must adjust curricula + training to mitigate risks, warn experts



BMJ Group






Overreliance on generative AI risks eroding new and future doctors’ critical thinking skills, while potentially reinforcing existing data bias and inequity, warns an editorial published in the online journal BMJ Evidence Based Medicine.

 

GenAI tools are already being widely used amid few institutional policies and regulatory guidance, point out the authors, who urge medical educators to exercise vigilance and adjust curricula and training to mitigate the technology’s pitfalls.

 

The use of AI is now used in a vast array of different tasks, but along with its burgeoning potential comes an increasing risk of overreliance on it and a host of potential issues for medical students and trainee doctors, note the authors from the University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

 

These include:

●       automation bias—uncritical trust of automated information after extended use

●       cognitive off-loading and outsourcing of reasoning—shifting information retrieval, appraisal, and synthesis to AI, so undermining critical thinking and memory retention

●       Deskilling—blunting skills, which is especially important for medical students and newly qualified doctors who are learning the skill in the first place and who lack the experience to probe AI’s advice

●       reinforcing existing data biases and inequity

●       hallucinations—fluent and plausible, but inaccurate, information

●       breaches of privacy, security, and data governance—a particular issue for the sensitive nature of healthcare data

 

The authors suggest various changes to help minimise these risks, including grading the process, rather than only the end product in educational assessments, on the assumption that learners will have used AI.

 

Critical skills assessments that exclude AI need to be designed, using supervised stations or in-person examinations—especially important, for bedside communication, physical examination, teamwork,  and professional judgement—suggest the authors.

 

And it may be prudent to evaluate AI itself as a competency, because “data literacy and teaching AI design, development, and evaluation are more important now than ever, and this knowledge is no longer a luxury for medical learners and trainees,” they add.

 

Medical trainees need to understand the principles and concepts underpinning Ai’s strengths and weaknesses as well as where and how AI tools can be usefully incorporated into clinical workflows and care pathways. And trainees also need to know how to evaluate their intended performance and potential biases over time, they emphasise.

 

“Enhanced critical thinking teaching is especially needed, which can be achieved by building cases where the AI outputs are a mix of correct and intentionally flawed responses…. Learners would then accept, amend, or reject, and justify their decision with primary evidence- based sources,” suggest the authors. 

 

Regulators, professional societies, and educational associations around the globe also need to play their part, by producing and regularly updating guidance on the impact of AI on medical education, urge the authors.

 

They conclude: “Generative AI has documented and well-researched benefits, but it is not without pitfalls, particularly to medical education and novice learners. These tools can fabricate sources, encode bias, lead to over-reliance and have negatively disruptive effects on the educational journey.

 

“Medical programmes must be vigilant about these risks and adjust their curricula and training programmes to stay ahead of them and mitigate their likelihood.”

 

Gender-specific supportive environment key to cutting female athletes’ injury risks



Among other things, this should be free of body shaming, idealised body types, and gendered norms, says the world’s first Consensus Statement on this topic




BMJ Group





Creating a safe, gender-specific, supportive environment—one that is free of body shaming and idealised female forms, for example—is key to minimising female athletes’ future risks of injury and protecting their health, emphasises the Female/woman/girl Athlete Injury pRevention (FAIR) Consensus Statement—the first of its kind—published online in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

 

Women and girls have increasingly been taking part in sports, which has led to a concomitant rise in their risk of injury. But how best to minimise this risk has been hampered by a lack of comprehensive and practical gender-specific evidence.

 

In a bid to tackle this knowledge gap and both promote and protect female athletes’ health, the International Olympic Committee convened a panel of sports and exercise specialists from around the globe to draw up a series of workable recommendations, with the aim of  informing current policy and practice and guiding future avenues of research.

 

The 56 recommendations in the Statement are based on syntheses of the best available evidence, combined with the lived experiences of athletes, as well as those involved in regulation, policy, practice, professional and personal support, to span the ‘whole sports system’.

 

The recommendations, which range from universal to sport specific, also include primary injury prevention strategies; policy, rules, and legislation; personal protective equipment; training; secondary injury prevention; modifiable risk factors; and approaches to diversity and inclusion.

 

“Injury prevention strategies cannot work if female/women/girl athletes do not have access to resources, knowledge or training/competition environments that support implementation of best practice injury prevention, health, and performance strategies that consider their needs,” says the Statement.

 

“The FAIR recommendations to facilitate a supportive environment include creating equitable funding and resource allocation (eg, injury prevention implementation, equipment, coach/support staff, gender/sex-preferred uniforms and surveillance systems with female/woman/girl-specific health codes) and access to expertise and knowledge through education, targeted research and hiring practices,” it continues.

 

Everyone who works in sport needs to be involved, urges the Statement.

 

“Recommendations such as ‘Create safe spaces free from body shaming or promoting ideal body types, or gendered norms’ might appear sensible, but they are NOT always part of female/woman/athletes’ reality. They should be front-of-mind and non-negotiable. At all levels of sport, responsibility must be taken for actions that can influence female/woman/girl athlete health,” it emphasises.

 

Other related recommendations include creating and enforcing gender based policies and procedures to tackle interpersonal violence and harassment, and fostering a non-judgmental culture in which issues, such as pregnancy, bone health, and breast care can be discussed and accommodated.

 

Policies to address unconscious and explicit social and cultural biases against women and girls’ sports participation and health are also essential, it says.

 

Lifelong injury prevention needs to start early to forge good preventive behaviours. And it needs to be a collaborative effort between athletes, coaches, and practitioners, and be evidence based, says the Statement.

 

Other key recommendations include:

●       Mandatory neuromuscular training warm-ups for all sports and all ages to ward off first and recurrent leg injuries, lasting a minimum of 10 minutes, twice a week

●       Implementation and enforcement of rules/policies that penalise unlawful head/body contact

●       Mandatory injury management across all sports to prevent concussion

●       All child and teen ice hockey players to wear mouthguards

●       All cyclists, skiers, snowboarders, skateboarders, horseriders to wear helmets

●       Neckguards/protectors to be worn for collision/contact ice sports

 

“We recognise that these recommendations must be responsive to diverse contexts, including uniqueness in experiences, expertise, geography, culture, healthcare access, sport structure, level of participation and sociocultural considerations,” says the Statement.

 

But it concludes: “To bolster female/women/girl athlete health and safety, every person (at all levels of sport participation and in their own specific context) can, and should, take responsibility to carefully consider and action these recommendations.”

Global study backs mandatory strength warm-ups for female athletes



La Trobe University





Routine strength exercise warm-ups should be mandated to reduce leg injuries in female athletes across all ages and levels of competitive sport, according to a new set of global recommendations co-led by La Trobe University, the University of Calgary and supported by the International Olympic Committee (IOC).  

Published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, the Female, woman, girl Athlete Injury pRevention (FAIR) Consensus Statement offers 56 practical recommendations to reduce injury risk and improve safety.  

The recommendations span policy reform, training, personal protective equipment, secondary prevention, implementation strategies and the creation of gender/sex-specific supportive sport environments. 

Co-author Professor Kay Crossley, Director of La Trobe University’s Sports and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, said the FAIR recommendations offered a roadmap for athletes, parents, coaches and sports administrators, which could be adapted to different settings and cultures. 

“This world-leading initiative recognises the unique injury risks faced by female athletes and provides clear, actionable guidance for everyone involved in sport, from grassroots to elite levels,” Professor Crossley said. 

Recommendations include: 

  • Mandated sport-specific strength, balance and control (neuromuscular) exercises for a minimum of 10 minutes, twice a week to prevent first-time and repeat leg injuries.  

  • Enforced fair play by disallowing dangerous contact to reduce injuries of all kinds. 

  • Knee braces should not be used to prevent first-time knee injuries, including anterior cruciate tears. Semi-rigid ankle braces should be used to prevent first-time and repeat sprains.  

  • Mandated mouthguards in collision sports to prevent concussion and dental injuries. 

  • Encouragement of properly fitted sports bras to reduce breast discomfort and skin irritation.  

  • Shared responsibility among sport partners for creating spaces where female, woman and girl athletes’ safety and wellbeing is front of mind and non-negotiable.  

  • Create safe spaces free from body shaming, idealised body types and gendered norms. 

Estimates suggest only 22 per cent of Australian women aged 15 years and over participated in a sport-related activity at least once a week. Women and girls often face gendered barriers in sport that can affect their safety, participation and performance.  

“The rates of sport participation and injuries in girls’ sport are increasing and many girls that get injured from sport don’t return,” said co-author Professor Carolyn Emery, from the University of Calgary’s Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre.  

Dr Jane Thornton, IOC’s Director of Health, Medicine and Science said the mandate of the Department is to promote and protect athlete health, in sport and through sport. Convening consensus meetings to produce global recommendations for injury and illness prevention such as the FAIR recommendations are a priority for the IOC. 

“There is a significant data gap in terms of how female athlete health data are collected and represented in research and policy. Injury and illness rates are disproportionately high and female athlete health has risen to be among the top five priorities for international sport federations.” 

Professor Crossley said many females, women and girls trained and competed in environments that were not set up for their success.  

“Targeted action is needed to educate sports partners and improve access to injury-prevention programs, good sporting facilities and resources that are supported by sufficient funding. 

“The FAIR Consensus helps address this gap by offering tools to protect female, woman and girl athletes’ health, extend careers and promote lifelong participation. We all have a role to play in creating safer, more inclusive sports environments where women and girls can thrive.” 

Note to editors: 

The FAIR Consensus followed an eight-step hybrid method. 109 authors from six continents conducted seven evidence reviews (systematic, scoping and concept mapping), synthesizing over 600 studies involving more than 600,000 participants. They reviewed evidence on injury prevention strategies, and modifiable risk factors for lower and upper extremity injuries, concussions, and spine, chest, abdominal and pelvic injuries and/or pain. These projects underpinned draft recommendations subsequently voted on by a Steering Committee of 24 experts and an External Advisory Committee of eight women with lived experience as athletes, coaches, and practitioners, including Olympians Paralympians, and representatives from low- and middle-income countries. Consensus was defined as ‘critical to include’ (≥70% scored recommendation as 7–9 [9-point Likert scale, 1=not important; 9=critically important] AND ≤15% scored recommendation as 1–3). 

 

Global analysis: Nearly one in five child deaths linked to growth failure



Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation






SEATTLE, Wash. Dec. 2, 2025 – Nearly one million children around the globe fail to reach their fifth birthday every year due to devastating health consequences linked to child growth failure, making it the third leading risk factor for mortality and morbidity in children under five. That’s among the new findings in the latest Global Burden of Disease 2023 study published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health today.

Estimates show the number of deaths associated with child growth failure (CGF) declined from 2.75 million in 2000 to 880,000 in 2023; however, the adverse health effects remain substantial and concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, where 618,000 deaths were recorded, and in South Asia, with 165,000 deaths.

Among the different indicators of CGF, underweight accounted for the greatest disease burden with 12% of all deaths in children under five, followed by wasting with 9%, and stunting at 8%. Researchers also discovered that a larger proportion of children suffered from stunting than previously estimated.

CGF increases the risk of death and disability from various diseases, and almost 800,000 children younger than five years died due to lower respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, malaria, and measles. In sub-Saharan Africa, 77% of diarrheal disease deaths and 65% of lower respiratory infection deaths in this age group in 2023 involved CGF. The proportions were also high in South Asia, where death estimates due to both causes were 79% and 53% respectively. The high-income region, which had the lowest number of deaths related to growth failure, had the lowest fraction of deaths from both causes at about 33% and 35% respectively.

“The drivers behind child growth failure are complex and cumulative due to feeding issues, food insecurity, climate change, lack of sanitation, or war,” said Dr. Bobby Reiner, co-author and professor at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine. “Therefore, no single strategy will improve their health across all regions.”

The research confirms that most stunted infants show signs of growth failure within the first three months of life, underscoring the importance of interventions before and during pregnancy. Wasting and stunting also create a destructive loop because stunting increases the risk of future wasting and vice versa, with this cycle worsening as children grow older. Growth failure in the first few months of life often indicate newborns born too small or too early, while growth failure in older infancy and early childhood might reflect other drivers of poor growth like nutritional inadequacy, repeated infection, or other causes.

“Given the difficulty in reversing stunting, the latest estimates in this study should be used to identify high prevalence locations, as early detection and intervention are critical,” said Dr. Reiner.