Thursday, January 16, 2025

CRIMINAL STATE CAPITALI$M

China property giant Vanke’s CEO ‘taken away’ by police: report



By AFP
January 16, 2025


A worker drives past residential buildings under construction by Chinese real estate developer Vanke in Hangzhou in March 2024 - Copyright AFP/File STR

The head of one of China’s biggest property firms has been “taken away” by police, state-backed media reported Thursday, as a prolonged housing slump continues to hit the world’s second-largest economy.

Zhu Jiusheng, CEO of Vanke, was “taken away by public security authorities”, the Economic Observer reported, citing sources.

Hong Kong-listed Vanke, which is part-owned by the government of Shenzhen, was China’s fourth-largest real-estate firm by sales last year, according to research firm CRIC.

It reported a net loss of 9.9 billion yuan ($1.35 billion) in the first half of 2024, its revenue plunging as home sales slumped.

The Economic Observer reported that “several sources” said Zhu had been taken away, without specifying whether he had been formally detained or what offences he may be alleged to have committed.

Calls and messages to Zhu and people close to him had gone unanswered, the outlet said.

AFP has contacted Vanke for comment.

The company has been caught in a debt crisis in China’s real estate sector that has left developers in financial trouble.

In September, rating agency Moody’s downgraded Vanke’s credit rating to B1, signifying it was “highly speculative”.

Slovak entrepreneur funding rescue of German flying taxi startup


By AFP
January 16, 2025


The Lilium Jet may make its first manned flight later this year - Copyright AFP/File STR

A Slovak entrepreneur is providing most of the funds to rescue a German flying taxi startup that came close to collapse last month, the firm’s new backers said Thursday.

Lilium had already filed for bankruptcy and was just hours from folding entirely on Christmas Eve when a consortium of investors swooped in to save it.

The consortium said a key figure is entrepreneur Marian Bocek, who runs holding company DTM Investment and founded Slovak battery manufacturer InoBat.

It is understood that Bocek, aged in his 40s, is providing more than 100 million euros ($103 million) in funding, out of more than 200 million euros from the consortium.

Germany’s Bild daily first revealed the investor’s identity.

A consortium spokesman said they now needed to find other partners and customers to launch production in earnest.

The group also said it has changed its name from Mobile Uplift Corporation to Lilium Aerospace.

Bocek’s InoBat is already a supplier to Lilium. Chinese battery maker Gotion owns a substantial stake in InoBat.

Lilium has been developing small electric-powered jets that can take off and land vertically.

Founded in 2015, the company attracted substantial interest, with 100 firm orders for its jets to date and hundreds more pre-orders.

It burnt through huge amounts of money in development costs, however, and initially turned to the state for emergency funding, but the request was rejected.

This led the firm to declare bankruptcy in October before the new consortium of investors emerged.

Lilium has yet to conduct a manned test flight. The first trial is expected this year, followed by the first anticipated deliveries to customers in 2026.


TRUMPISM PENDING

European carmakers warn against EU-US trade war


By AFP
January 16, 2025


Mercedes CEO Ola Kallenius warned a 'trade conflict' with the United States 'would be significantly economically harmful to the EU' - Copyright AFP/File STR

Europe’s biggest automakers called on the European Union Thursday to avoid a “trade conflict” with the United States, days before Donald Trump officially returns as president.

Trump, who will be sworn in on Monday, has repeatedly threatened to hike tariffs on European products, as well as goods made by China and other allies like Canada.

“If we end up in a trade conflict, our clear assessment is that would be significantly economically harmful to the EU and to the European auto industry,” warned Ola Kallenius, Mercedes CEO and new president of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA).

In a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the European automotive lobby urged the EU to “try to avoid a potential trade conflict”.

“The more free and open the markets are, the better for the European auto industry,” Kallenius told reporters, pointing to trade with United States and China.

For German auto giant Mercedes, the US market represented around 15 percent of its global car sales in 2024.

ACEA repeated its call Thursday for the European Union to be “flexible” in its scramble to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

European carmakers are especially opposed to potential fines the EU could impose if they fail to meet 2025 emissions reduction targets.

The struggling industry has also faced difficulties selling electric cars and has called for support measures rather than financial penalties.



– ‘Existential’ risk –



In an interview with AFP, ACEA director general Sigrid de Vries warned the risk was “existential” for the industry as many manufacturers have announced job cuts in Europe.

“We cannot just live on financial services or other services. We need a manufacturing industry footprint. We need innovation here and we need also to be able to export to other regions,” de Vries said.

“You cannot just have targets on paper and being very rigid about it, you need to add some flexibility to adjust for real world conditions,” she said.

De Vries also said the electric vehicle market was “not developing as it should be”.

Von der Leyen promised to launch talks with the sector in the coming weeks, and the EU’s industrial chief, Stephane Sejourne, was in the German southwestern city of Stuttgart Thursday to hear the industry’s concerns.

Environmental groups however fear the commission will unravel parts of the Green Deal, the EU’s ambitious climate plan that aims to make the bloc carbon-neutral by 2050.

‘Heinous crimes’ in Gaza conflict must be punished, regardless of truce: HRW


By AFP
January 16, 2025


Much of Gaza has been reduced to rubble by the Israeli military offensive, with Human Rights Watch saying there had been 'crimes against humanity' committed by that country's forces - Copyright AFP Omar AL-QATTAA

Human Rights Watch on Thursday called for punishment for the “heinous crimes” committed “on and since October 7, 2023,” in Israel and Gaza, after the announcement of a fragile ceasefire deal in the conflict.

“While yesterday Israeli officials and Hamas agreed to a multi-phase ceasefire, the heinous crimes committed on and since October 7, 2023, should not go unpunished,” said HRW chief Tirana Hassan.

Hassan was speaking at a press conference to launch the organization’s annual report, in which it called out Israel for committing “crimes against humanity” and possibly “genocide” during the Gaza war.

Qatar and the United States on Wednesday announced the ceasefire deal had been reached between Israel and Hamas in their bloody 15-month conflict.

But Israeli air strikes have continued as it accuses the Palestinian armed group of reneging on parts of the agreement.

“Whilst the ceasefire will bring some relief for the millions of displaced inside Gaza, it won’t be a solution in and of itself,” said Hassan.

At least 1.9 million people — or 90 percent of Gaza’s population — have been displaced by Israel’s offensive in the territory, according to UN estimates.

An estimated 345,000 people in Gaza face “catastrophic levels” of food insecurity, the UN says.

“What will be required moving forward is humanitarian access, and that by that, we’re talking about the Israeli authorities, allowing materials in to rebuild the infrastructure, including the water infrastructure and the health system, which has been decimated during this conflict, as well as humanitarian relief,” Hassan said.

Much of Gaza has been levelled by Israel’s punishing assault on the Palestinian territory, which has killed 46,788 people, most of them civilians, according to figures from the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry that the UN considers reliable.

The war was triggered by the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,210 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of official Israeli figures.

During the attack, Palestinian militants also took 251 people hostage, 94 of whom are still being held in Gaza, including 34 the Israeli military says are dead.

Israel’s cabinet has yet to approve the ceasefire agreement, which was due to be implemented from Sunday.

US trade envoy finds China shipbuilding policies ‘actionable’


By AFP
January 16, 2025

The US Trade Representative said Thursday that its probe into China’s practices in the shipbuilding, maritime and logistics sectors found that Beijing’s “targeted dominance” warranted action.

The conclusion comes after the USTR launched an investigation last year, responding to a petition by five unions.

“Beijing’s targeted dominance of these sectors undermines fair, market-oriented competition, increases economic security risks, and is the greatest barrier to revitalization of US industries,” USTR Katherine Tai said in a statement.

Tai added that the findings, under Section 301 of the Trade Act, “set the stage for urgent action to invest in America and strengthen our supply chains.”

A Section 301 investigation was a key tool President-elect Donald Trump’s first administration used to justify tariff hikes on Chinese goods.

Beijing has previously criticized the US investigation as being “full of false accusations.”

But Tai said Thursday that the United States builds fewer than five ships each year — a sharp decline from in the 1970s — while China builds more than 1,700.

The USTR investigation found China’s efforts to dominate the sector “unreasonable” as it displaces foreign firms and creates dependencies on the world’s second biggest economy.

The USTR added that Beijing also has “extraordinary control over its economic actors and these sectors.”

But a decision on what actions to take would be considered in the next stage of the probe.

On Thursday, Alliance for American Manufacturing president Scott Paul applauded the pursuit of the investigation.

“Failing to take decisive action will leave our shipbuilding capabilities at the mercy of Beijing’s persistent predatory market distortions,” Paul said.


CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Toyota exposed as major funder of climate change deniers: Watchdog
 Common Dreams
January 15, 2025 

The Toyota Prius. (Shutterstock)

Nearly three decades after its introduction, the hybrid Toyota Prius is still associated with environmental action and the scientific consensus that fossil fuel emissions, including those from vehicles, must be reduced to avoid the worst effects of planetary heating.

But a Tuesday report from watchdog group Public Citizen reveals how Toyota has spent recent years becoming the largest funder of U.S. lawmakers who deny the existence of the climate emergency, and a major opponent to the expansion of electric vehicles.

In the report, titled Driving Denial, senior clean vehicles campaigner Adam Zuckerman wrote how Toyota has emerged over the last three election cycles as the auto industry's top financial backer of climate deniers in Congress—donating to 207 of their campaigners.


Top climate-denying beneficiaries of Toyota include U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who received $10,000 from Toyota in during the 2024 cycle—the maximum amount allowed—and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), who received $7,000 after he called for the end of EV tax credits and demanded the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) be eliminated.

Between 2020-24, Toyota's political action committee (PAC) has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to right-wing lawmakers including Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) and Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.)—giving a total of "$808,500 to the campaigns of congressional candidates that deny or question the existence of climate change," according to Public Citizen.

Despite Toyota's reputation as a hybrid car innovator, said Zuckerman, "the world's largest automaker has quietly spent the past several years building a powerful U.S. influence operation in an effort to delay the transition to electric vehicles."

"Funding a small army of climate-denying lawmakers, while lobbying aggressively against stronger emissions and fuel economy standards, is a volatile combination intended to roll back policies that protect our communities and planet," he said.

In addition to financing the campaigns of lawmakers who deny that fossil fuel emissions are heating the planet and contributing to more extreme wildfires, hurricanes, and other disasters, Toyota has also directly pushed back against climate regulations.

Three days after President-elect Donald Trump won the November election, Toyota Motor North America executive Jack Hollis falsely called tailpipe emissions standards introduced by California and the EPA "EV mandates" and claimed they will "remove consumer choice."


"Funding a small army of climate-denying lawmakers, while lobbying aggressively against stronger emissions and fuel economy standards, is a volatile combination intended to roll back policies that protect our communities and planet."

Hollis also wrote a Wall Street Journalop-ed called on the incoming Trump administration to dismantle Biden-era policies that push automakers to reduce emissions, and in December, Toyota announced it was donating $1 million to Trump's inauguration


"Instead of embracing a green energy future, Toyota has aggressively lobbied to delay and weaken climate action," Public Citizen's report reads.

Toyota's advocacy "has borne results," notes the report. "During the Biden administration, lobbying from Toyota and others forced the EPA to weaken an ambitious EPA plan to limit vehicle emissions. The changes slow the adoption of more stringent vehicle pollution limits, making it easier for EV laggards like Toyota to meet regulations without building electric vehicles."

While billing itself as a global climate leader in recent decades, Toyota was named by InfluenceMap as the third-worst company in the world for anti-climate lobbying, after only fossil fuel giants Chevron and ExxonMobil.

InfluenceMap's 2024 scorecard "highlights Toyota's lobbying efforts against emissions standards in the U.S. and Australia and against EV mandates in Canada and the United Kingdom, as well as Toyota's success in weakening emissions stands in the U.S. and fuel efficiency standards in Australia," reads the Public Citizen report.

While ramping up its lobbying efforts Toyota has invested in carbon-intensive hydrogen-powered vehicles such as the Mirai, a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle (HFCV) introduced in 2014. The Mirai has sold fewer than 25,000 units and has failed to provide consumers with the infrastructure needed for HFCVs, with just 60 hydrogen refueling stations in the U.S. and Canada—leading to a class action lawsuit against the automaker.

The company has pursued "a risky strategy that has left Toyota vulnerable to an influx of competitors who have leapfrogged the auto giant to build the next generation of vehicles," reads the report. "Instead of innovating, Toyota has bankrolled lobbyists and climate-hostile lawmakers to help it defeat EVs."

According to the report, the automaker's abandonment of EV innovation and embrace of climate denial begs the question: "In 20 years, how will the world think of Toyota?"

EVs, said Zuckerman, "are the future of the automotive industry, and if it fails to evolve, Toyota risks becoming the next Kodak or Blockbuster, corporate giants that fought innovation and paid the price for it."
Critics Warn Trump Picks for EPA and Interior Would Only Serve Billionaire Polluters

Climate advocates are sounding the alarm over nominees Doug Burgum and Lee Zeldin.


Former Congressman Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) testifies at a confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C., on January 16, 2025 and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum speaks at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on July 17, 2024.
(Photos: Ting Shen and Kamil Krzaczynski/AFP via Getty Images)



Jessica Corbett
Jan 16, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

As Republican-controlled Senate committees held Thursday morning confirmation hearings for U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's picks to lead the Department of the Interior and Environmental Protection Agency, climate advocates warned that the pair would serve billionaire polluters, endangering the American people, the nation's natural resources, and the planet.

Republican North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, Trump's choice for interior secretary, appeared before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, while former New York Congressman Lee Zeldin, his nominee for EPA administrator, met with the chamber's Committee on Environment and Public Works.

"Doug Burgum, the billionaire governor of North Dakota, bought his way into Trump's orbit by launching a long-shot presidential campaign with his fortune from selling his software company to Microsoft," said Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen's Energy Program, in a statement. "Burgum is also a real estate and technology investor who leases his own land for oil exploration to Continental Resources, run by close Trump ally Harold Hamm."

As Accountable.US, another watchdog, pointed out, Burgum also leases his land to Hess and "reportedly played a major role in facilitating an infamous meeting at Mar-a-Lago between Donald Trump and a handful of big oil CEOs," including Hamm.

Also highlighting the nominee's reported role in the Florida event "where plutocrats were asked to donate a billion dollars to Trump in exchange for gutting environmental protections," Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program, quipped that "if Doug Burgum got any closer to the oil and gas industry, he'd need to wear a hard hat."

"It's clear who would benefit from him running the Department of the Interior," Manuel said. "For more than a century, our national parks and public lands and waters have been part of what makes us special as a country. The incoming Trump administration wants to give those lands and waters away to corporate polluters and billionaires. We need to protect every inch of our public lands from corporate interests and polluters so future generations can explore the treasured lands that connect us all."




Slocum similarly said that "his extensive corporate ties ensure that the Interior Department would be led by a Big Oil lackey who will prioritize the American Petroleum Institute over the American people," and "would open up the door for massive exploitation of the nation's public lands for oil, gas, coal, and mining."

"Trump has named Burgum to lead a new White House energy council, potentially named the National Energy Dominance Council," Slocum noted, citing Politico. He also pointed out that Trump has "given the interior secretary a role on the National Security Council for the first time," warning that the president-elect may use "a bogus national energy emergency" to push dirty energy.


Slocum's colleague David Arkush, director of Public Citizen's Climate Program, expressed similar concerns about Zeldin, saying that if allowed to become EPA administrator, he "would turn the agency on its head and run it for the benefit of billionaire polluters at the expense of the American people."

"In Congress, Zeldin voted repeatedly against measures to protect our environment and fix the climate crisis, and Trump says he is counting on Zeldin for 'swift deregulatory decisions,'" Arkush stressed, pointing to Zeldin's pledge "to use the EPA to 'pursue energy dominance.'"

"The U.S. is already the largest producer of petroleum products in history, is the world's largest fossil gas producer, and is exporting gas at record levels," he noted. "What's left to dominate except American families—attacking their health and pocketbooks while setting their homes on fire in pursuit of ever more fossil fuel profits?"

"The Senate should reject Trump's shameful pro-polluter, pro-billionaire, anti-environment, anti-American-people nominees," Arkush argued. Sierra Club legislative director Melinda Pierce also urged senators to reject Zeldin, to "protect the lives and livelihoods of this and all future generations."

"He has failed to adequately address the very real threat climate change poses to our nation as the American people wake each day to more deadly fires, more flooding, and dangerous record temperatures stealing more of our lives and land each day," Pierce said of Zeldin, nodding to the fires raging in California and calling out his record in Congress.

In addition to opposing money for the national flood insurance program and voting to drastically slash EPA funding, "Zeldin has called for the repeal of standards that protect clean air and clean water," she continued. "Him ascending to a role that would allow him to do polluters' bidding from within the agency tasked with administering and enforcing those protections makes him a threat to us all."

After Zeldin's hearing, Food & Water Watch policy director Jim Walsh said that he "was asked several questions about fossil fuel industry propaganda campaigns, as well as the absurd theories spread by President Trump regarding our environment and the planet. At every turn, Zeldin danced around the questions. It is clear that Zeldin will be a rubber stamp for industry priorities, jeopardizing clean air and water, and driving up costs for everyday families."


This week has featured a flurry of hearings for Trump nominees—including Tuesday events for Fox News host and former Wisconsin Congressman Sean Duffy, the president-elect's pick to lead the Department of Transportation, and Chris Wright, a fracking CEO and promoter of climate disinformation on track to be the next energy secretary.

Duffy and Wright have provoked intense criticism from climate groups—including members of the youth-led Sunrise Movement, who held a protest at Wright's hearing during which 10 campaigners were arrested.

"Zeldin, Burgum, and Wright are unqualified to serve in these critical environmental positions," Allie Rosenbluth, United States program manager at Oil Change International, said last week. "With Zeldin and Burgum each receiving hundreds of thousands in fossil fuel campaign money and Wright's position as a fracking CEO, their loyalties lie with industry profits, not protecting Americans' air, water, climate, and working-class families. These men will choose items off the fossil fuel industry's wishlist over the good of the American people every time."

Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) on Thursday introduced a bill that would ban former oil, gas, and coal executives or lobbyists from multiple federal posts—including EPA administrator and secretaries of energy, the interior, and transportation—for a decade after leaving their private sector jobs.

'He has called it a hoax': Bernie Sanders gets EPA nominee to contradict Trump in hearing


David Edwards
January 16, 2025

Senate/PBS/screen grab

Former New York Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) admitted climate change was "real" at a confirmation hearing to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

During his first term, President-elect Trump made deregulation at the EPA a top agenda item and was expected to double down during his second term.

During a Thursday Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing, Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) pointed to recent hurricanes and wildfires in California as evidence of a changing climate.

"In the midst of all of that, President-elect Trump has said that climate change is a hoax," Sanders explained. "Do you agree with President-elect Trump that climate change is a hoax?"

"I believe that climate change is real, as I told you," Zeldin replied. "As far as President Trump goes, the context that I've heard him speak about it was with criticism of policies that have been acted because of climate change, and I think he's concerned about the economic costs of some policies where there's a debate and a difference of opinion between parties."

Sanders interrupted to disagree.

"I think he has called it a hoax time and time and time again," the senator said of Trump. "Would you describe climate change as an existential threat, meaning that there must be an urgency to get our act together, to get our act together to address it?"

"Senator, we must, with urgency, be addressing these issues," Zeldin insisted.

Watch the video below or click here.



Senate Democrats' Bill Would Block Trump Fossil Fuel 'Cartel' From Running Key Agencies

"Big Oil executives and fossil fuel lobbyists shouldn't be able to turn public agencies into private profit machines for fossil fuel shareholders," argued Sen. Ed Markey.



U.S. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) speaks while Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) looks on in the background at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on June 15, 2021.
(Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)


Brett Wilkins
Jan 16, 2025
CMMON DREAMS

Faced with the imminent White House return of Republican President-elect Donald Trump and an administration stacked with fossil fuel industry veterans, a pair of progressive U.S. Senate Democrats on Thursday introduced legislation that would ban former oil, gas, and coal executives or lobbyists from leading numerous energy-related federal agencies for 10 years after leaving their private sector jobs.

The Banning In Government Oil Industry Lobbyists (BIG OIL) from the Cabinet Act—put forth by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.)—would apply to prospective secretaries of agriculture, defense, energy, the interior, state, and transportation; as well as key posts including administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; White House chief of staff; and directors of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Office of Management and Budget.

"Let's pass this bill and get fossil fuel executives and their ill-gotten bucks out of our government."

"Donald Trump isn't building a Cabinet, he's installing a cartel. Big Oil executives and fossil fuel lobbyists shouldn't be able to turn public agencies into private profit machines for fossil fuel shareholders," said Markey. "This is a clear ethical line—their work polluting our environment, destroying our climate, and prioritizing corporate profits over democracy must not be rewarded with even more power over the very safeguards set to protect American households from their influence."

"Especially in the wake of the Los Angeles wildfires and more frequent and dangerous disasters fueled by climate change, we can't afford to have a fossil fuel CEO like Chris Wright help the industry capture our federal agencies further for oil profits," Markey added, referring to the fracking services company chief executive nominated by Trump to head the Department of Energy. "We must have government agencies helmed by responsible, qualified executives without blatant conflicts of interest."




Merkley said: "Climate chaos fueled by dirty energy is humanity's greatest challenge, and Trump wants to make sure we fail that challenge by handing our government over to Big Oil. Let's pass this bill and get fossil fuel executives and their ill-gotten bucks out of our government."

Scores of climate, environmental justice, government transparency, and other groups have endorsed the bill.

"The fossil fuel revolving door has dominated American energy policy for decades and could poison our environment for centuries to come," Food & Water Watch policy adviser Drew Guillory said in a statement Thursday. "Oil and gas companies cannot be allowed to regulate themselves and use the government to guarantee their profits. The BIG OIL from the Cabinet Act is a crucial step in returning control of our climate to the American people."

Kelsey Crane, senior policy advocate at Earthworks, said: "The fossil fuel industry is notorious for spending millions of dollars to delay climate action and undermine progress on environmental justice. This bill ensures big polluters are not granted positions of power where it is guaranteed they would degrade environmental protections and block investments in a clean energy future."

Sunrise Movement executive director Aru Shiney-Ajay noted that "Los Angeles is on fire. Asheville is just starting to rebuild."

"The climate crisis is here and it's happening because oil and gas CEOs disregarded science and chose to keep burning fossil fuels," Shiney-Ajay added. "They chose to sacrifice millions of homes and lives so they could keep profiting. Those same people should not be in charge of creating energy policy."

Climate Liar and Fracking CEO Chris Wright Pilloried Ahead of Confirmation Hearing

"As fires level entire neighborhoods in Los Angeles, the last thing we need is to put an oil CEO in charge of energy policy," said organizers.


Liberty Oilfield Services CEO Chris Wright is seen on January 17, 2018.
(Photo: Andy Cross/The Denver Post via Getty Images_

Julia Conley
Jan 15, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

With the U.S. Senate holding confirmation hearings for several of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's Cabinet nominees on Wednesday, climate organizers were joined by progressive lawmakers outside the Capitol to speak out against one potential administration official in particular—who they warned poses "a threat to our democracy and our future."

The subject of the press conference, organized by the Sunrise Movement, was Liberty Energy CEO Chris Wright, whom Trump nominated to be secretary of energy.

"As fires level entire neighborhoods in Los Angeles, the last thing we need is to put an oil CEO in charge of energy policy," said the group, referring to deadly wildfires that have destroyed an estimated 12,300 buildings, including thousands of homes, in recent days.




The press conference was just the latest expression of outrage over Trump's selection of Wright, who contributed $400,000 to Trump's campaign in what Sunrise said was an effort "to buy the energy secretary role."

The Sierra Club called Wright the "personification of 'conflict of interest,'" noting that he has spent decades denying the connection between his company's work and the climate emergency while "getting rich from polluting, dangerous fracking for methane gas."

"Wright made it clear that, if confirmed, he'd hinder clean energy investment and promote fossil fuels like LNG exports, further enriching himself and his fellow oil and gas CEOs while we continue to pay the price with more pollution and higher energy costs," said Mahyar Sorour, director of Beyond Fossil Fuels policy for Sierra Club. "As Americans from coast to coast are living with the catastrophic consequences of the climate crisis, the last thing we need is a climate-denying fossil fuel executive at the helm of our nation's energy policy."

In 2021, Wright said on a podcast that planetary heating "is not" fueling wildfires—a claim directly at odds with scientists' warning that the changing climate, driven by fossil fuel extraction, is increasing the frequency and intensity of wildfires in Western states as well as areas that have historically faced far less destructive fire seasons.

He doubled down on the claim in 2023 as smoke from intense wildfires in Canada drifted across the U.S. East Coast, writing in a post on LinkedIn that "the hype over wildfires is just hype to justify" Democratic climate policies, and last year he told the House Financial Services Committee that "it is popular today to suggest that somehow in the next 10 or 30 years we are going to 'transition' fully away from fossil fuels. This cannot and will not happen."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday shared a video Wright posted to LinkedIn last year, in which he asserted, "We have seen no increase in the frequency or intensity of hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, or floods despite endless fear mongering of the media, politicians and activists."

"What on Earth is this man talking about?" asked Schumer. "Is he such an idealogue that he doesn't see the truth of the world around him?"

Should he be confirmed to lead the Department of Energy (DOE), said Allie Rosenbluth, United States program manager at Oil Change International (OCI), on Monday, Wright would "do his best to put a rapid end to President [Joe] Biden's pause on new authorizations for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports." The move would raise the price of electricity, increasing prices for U.S. households by 30%, according to a recent analysis by Public Citizen, and would increase greenhouse gas emissions.

"While these actions will face stiff legal challenges and public outrage, if allowed to go forward, they will harm public health and safety for the sake of fossil fuel industry profits," said Rosenbluth. "According to the International Energy Agency, any new fossil fuel development is incompatible with meeting our climate goals and protecting our communities from devastating climate disasters like the Los Angeles fires."

Tiernan Sittenfeld, senior vice president of government affairs of the League of Conservation Voters, said Trump's nomination of Wright is a signal that the Republican president-elect "is following through on the $1 billion offer he made to Big Oil at a dinner this spring," when he urged executives to donate to his campaign in return for rolled back climate regulations once Trump is in office.

"It is not surprising, but still appalling that Trump's pick for secretary of energy is a climate-denying Big Oil executive," said Sittenfeld.

Accountable.US called on senators weighing Wright's nomination to consider several facts about his career in the fracking industry before voting to confirm him as energy secretary, including:Liberty Energy has seven subsidiaries, several of which have business interests before the DOE;
One subsidiary, Liberty Oilfield Services, operates facilities that the Environmental Protection Agency has cited for repeat Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) violations and noncompliance with Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting standards;
Wright sits on the board of directors of the Western Energy Alliance, which has spent $675,000 on oil and gas lobbying during his tenure; and
The Western Energy Alliance submitted a public comment in 2023 regarding the DOE's gas stove rule raising fuel efficiency requirements.
"Chris Wright's confirmation would be a win for Big Oil and a loss for climate action, environmental justice, and clean energy progress," said Accountable.US on Wedneday. "His track record shows he's unfit to serve as secretary of energy."


'I Won't Let My Future Burn': Protesters Arrested at Fracking CEO Chris Wright's Senate Hearing

"The climate crisis is here. Oil and gas CEOs like Chris Wright have blood on their hands, and they have no place in our government," said Sunrise Movement's Aru Shiney-Ajay.


Ten people were arrested for disrupting the Senate confirmation hearing of Chris Wright, the head of a fracking firm and President-elect Donald Trump's pick for energy secretary, on January 15, 2025.
(Photo: Rachael Warriner/Sunrise Movement)

Eloise Goldsmith
Jan 15, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

While senators questioned Chris Wright—the CEO of Liberty Energy, a fracking company, and President-elect Donald Trump's pick to be the next secretary of energy—10 activists were arrested for disrupting Wright's confirmation hearing on Wednesday, according to a statement from the Sunrise Movement, a youth climate group.

"I am 18 years old and I want a future, but wealthy and powerful special interests are selling that future to make a profit," said Adah Crandall, one of those arrested, according to the statement. "That's why I stood up today, for myself and all the young people right now who are terrified about the world we will live in when we are Chris Wright's age."



Protestors with the Sunrise Movement stationed outside of the confirmation hearing wore shirts that said "I WON'T LET MY FUTURE BURN" and held up banners that read "Oil CEOs Profit, LA Burns"—in references to the ongoing wildfires ravaging the Los Angeles area.

"The climate crisis is here. Oil and gas CEOs like Chris Wright have blood on their hands, and they have no place in our government,” said Sunrise executive director Aru Shiney-Ajay, in the statement. "Fossil fuel CEOs knew—before we were born—that burning fossil fuels would cause disasters like these fires in LA. They condemned us to die."

Wright's nomination, which appears likely given that Republicans hold a 53-47 majority Senate, has drawn the ire of climate and watchdog groups more broadly.

Mahyar Sorour, a director at the Sierra Clubrecently calledWright the "personification" of a conflict of interest, noting that he has spent decades denying the connection between his company's work and the climate emergency while "getting rich from polluting, dangerous fracking for methane gas."

In 2021, Wright—who has been a longtime evangelist for fossil fuels—said on a podcast that planetary heating "is not" fueling wildfires—a claim directly at odds with scientists' warning that the changing climate, driven by fossil fuel extraction, is increasing the frequency and intensity of wildfires in Western states as well as areas that have historically faced far less destructive fire seasons.

Wright's past remarks resurfaced during his hearing Wednesday. During a tense exchange, Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said that Wright had once written on social media that "the hype over wildfires is just hype to justify more impoverishment from bad government policies." Padilla asked Wright if he still believes wildfires are just hype. Wright said that he watched the fires unfold with "sorrow and fear" but didn't retract his past statement when pressed by Padilla.

"I stand by my past comments," Wright said.

Hearing for Trump DOT Pick Highlights Conflicts of Interests, Push for More Auto Pollution

"Will Duffy use his power to protect the bottom line of his former corporate clients by scrapping basic transparency protections at the expense of everyday Americans?" asked one critic.


Former U.S. Rep. Sean Duffy (R-Wis.) testifies before a Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on his nomination to be U.S. secretary of transportation on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on January 15, 2025.
(Photo: Ting Shen/AFP via Getty Images)

Julia Conley
Jan 15, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

U.S. senators on Wednesday held confirmation hearings for numerous nominees for positions in President-elect Donald Trump's Cabinet, including two who would oversee pollution rules—and climate action groups warned that both men would face major conflicts of interest due to their work for the very industries they would be tasked with regulating.

As Common Dreamsreported, energy secretary Chris Wright is a longtime denier of the climate crisis who's made his fortune in the fossil fuel industry, and as lawmakers were hearing from him Wednesday, transportation secretary nominee Sean Duffy was testifying before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee on his experience and political views.

The hearing, said government watchdog Accountable.US, "failed to resolve concerns around a major conflict of interest" tied to Duffy due to his past lobbying for the same airlines that are currently suing the Department of Transportation (DOT).

Duffy, a former Republican congressman from Wisconsin, became a lobbyist for BGR Government Affairs in 2019, after serving in the House. He and the firm were hired by "Partnership for Open Skies," which includes as its members American, United, and Delta airlines, to lobby for a "U.S. open skies policy."

Those airlines all joined a lawsuit against the DOT last May, challenging the Biden administration's rule to "protect airline passengers from surprise junk fees when purchasing a ticket."

"DOT needs leadership that prioritizes strong safety standards and environmental justice—not someone with limited qualifications to address these urgent challenges."


"Sean Duffy's lobbying work for the same airlines now suing to overturn a Transportation Department rule against surprise junk fees poses a major conflict," said Tony Carrk, executive director of Accountable. "Will Duffy use his power to protect the bottom line of his former corporate clients by scrapping basic transparency protections at the expense of everyday Americans? Duffy is just one of several Trump nominees with similar conflicts of interest that confirm the incoming administration intends to take care of wealthy corporate special interests first and working people last."

At the hearing, said Accountable, Duffy failed to answer questions about his past lobbying and his comments in 2022 about the DOT's push to investigate Southwest Airlines' holiday scheduling crisis.

"Southwest will fix this… [Secretary of Transportation] Pete Buttigieg never will," said Duffy at the time.

Accountable said the nominee's position begged the question, "If Duffy had been the transportation secretary during this crisis, what, if anything, would he have done to protect consumers? Or would he have solely relied on market forces to determine Southwest's penalty, allowing the company to avoid accountability while leaving current and future passengers without restitution or support?"

Kelsey Crane of the climate group Earthworks warned that Duffy's "complete disregard for climate science and disdain for clean energy is deeply concerning."

The DOT plays a "critical role in regulating methane emissions from oil and gas pipelines and permitting oil and gas export terminals that threaten public health and the climate," said Crane, but similar to Wright, Duffy has dismissed the warnings of "climate alarmists" and suggested climate science is an "agenda of control."

"Frontline communities are already suffering the effects of climate pollution and inadequate oversight," said Crane. "DOT needs leadership that prioritizes strong safety standards and environmental justice—not someone with limited qualifications to address these urgent challenges. Sean Duffy's close ties to the oil and gas industry and denial of clear climate science raises serious doubts about his ability to safeguard public health and the climate."

In his post-congressional career as a Fox News host, Duffy used his platform to attack Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards aimed at expanding access to clean vehicles, said the Sierra Club's Katherine García—evidence of his "dangerous and misinformed beliefs."

"We need a secretary of transportation that understands the reality that transportation is the leading source of climate emissions and is committed to clean transportation solutions that will help protect our communities," said García, the director of the group's Clean Transportation for All campaign. "Sean Duffy has no business running DOT and we urge the Senate to reject him."
Climate liar and fracking CEO Chris Wright pilloried ahead of confirmation hearing

Julia Conley,
 Common Dreams
January 15, 2025 

Liberty Oilfield Services Inc. CEO Chris Wright rings a ceremonial bell to celebrate the company's IPO on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange shortly after the opening bell in New York, U.S., January 12, 2018. (REUTERS/Lucas Jackson)

With the U.S. Senate holding confirmation hearings for several of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's Cabinet nominees on Wednesday, climate organizers were joined by progressive lawmakers outside the Capitol to speak out against one potential administration official in particular—who they warned poses "a threat to our democracy and our future."

The subject of the press conference, organized by the Sunrise Movement, was Liberty Energy CEO Chris Wright, whom Trump nominated to be secretary of energy.

"As fires level entire neighborhoods in Los Angeles, the last thing we need is to put an oil CEO in charge of energy policy," said the group, referring to deadly wildfires that have destroyed an estimated 12,300 buildings, including thousands of homes, in recent days.




The press conference was just the latest expression of outrage over Trump's selection of Wright, who contributed $400,000 to Trump's campaign in what Sunrise said was an effort "to buy the energy secretary role."

The Sierra Club called Wright the "personification of 'conflict of interest,'" noting that he has spent decades denying the connection between his company's work and the climate emergency while "getting rich from polluting, dangerous fracking for methane gas."


"Wright made it clear that, if confirmed, he'd hinder clean energy investment and promote fossil fuels like LNG exports, further enriching himself and his fellow oil and gas CEOs while we continue to pay the price with more pollution and higher energy costs," said Mahyar Sorour, director of Beyond Fossil Fuels policy for Sierra Club. "As Americans from coast to coast are living with the catastrophic consequences of the climate crisis, the last thing we need is a climate-denying fossil fuel executive at the helm of our nation's energy policy."

In 2021, Wright said on a podcast that planetary heating "is not" fueling wildfires—a claim directly at odds with scientists' warning that the changing climate, driven by fossil fuel extraction, is increasing the frequency and intensity of wildfires in Western states as well as areas that have historically faced far less destructive fire seasons.

He doubled down on the claim in 2023 as smoke from intense wildfires in Canada drifted across the U.S. East Coast, writing in a post on LinkedIn that "the hype over wildfires is just hype to justify" Democratic climate policies, and last year he told the House Financial Services Committee that "it is popular today to suggest that somehow in the next 10 or 30 years we are going to 'transition' fully away from fossil fuels. This cannot and will not happen."


Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday shared a video Wright posted to LinkedIn last year, in which he asserted, "We have seen no increase in the frequency or intensity of hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, or floods despite endless fear mongering of the media, politicians and activists."

"What on Earth is this man talking about?" asked Schumer. "Is he such an idealogue that he doesn't see the truth of the world around him?"

Should he be confirmed to lead the Department of Energy (DOE), said Allie Rosenbluth, United States program manager at Oil Change International (OCI), on Monday, Wright would "do his best to put a rapid end to President [Joe] Biden's pause on new authorizations for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports." The move would raise the price of electricity, increasing prices for U.S. households by 30%, according to a recent analysis by Public Citizen, and would increase greenhouse gas emissions.

"While these actions will face stiff legal challenges and public outrage, if allowed to go forward, they will harm public health and safety for the sake of fossil fuel industry profits," said Rosenbluth. "According to the International Energy Agency, any new fossil fuel development is incompatible with meeting our climate goals and protecting our communities from devastating climate disasters like the Los Angeles fires."


Tiernan Sittenfeld, senior vice president of government affairs of the League of Conservation Voters, said Trump's nomination of Wright is a signal that the Republican president-elect "is following through on the $1 billion offer he made to Big Oil at a dinner this spring," when he urged executives to donate to his campaign in return for rolled back climate regulations once Trump is in office.

"It is not surprising, but still appalling that Trump's pick for secretary of energy is a climate-denying Big Oil executive," said Sittenfeld.

Accountable.US called on senators weighing Wright's nomination to consider several facts about his career in the fracking industry before voting to confirm him as energy secretary, including:Liberty Energy has seven subsidiaries, several of which have business interests before the DOE;
One subsidiary, Liberty Oilfield Services, operates facilities that the Environmental Protection Agency has cited for repeat Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) violations and noncompliance with Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting standards;
Wright sits on the board of directors of the Western Energy Alliance, which has spent $675,000 on oil and gas lobbying during his tenure; and
The Western Energy Alliance submitted a public comment in 2023 regarding the DOE's gas stove rule raising fuel efficiency requirements."Chris Wright's confirmation would be a win for Big Oil and a loss for climate action, environmental justice, and clean energy progress," said

Accountable.US on Wednesday. "His track record shows he's unfit to serve as secretary of energy."
Air in 12 Texas counties exceeded federal soot standards. Only four may face consequences

Alejandra Martinez, The Texas Tribune
January 15, 2025 

The Smokehouse Creek wildfire charred grasslands outside of the Panhandle town of Canadian on Feb. 28, 2024. Wildfires are among the soot-causing events that the state's environmental agency said pushed the air in some Texas counties above the EPA's new soot standards. Credit: REUTERS/Nick Oxford/via Texas Tribune

"The air in 12 Texas counties exceeded federal soot standards. Only four may face consequences." was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Twelve Texas counties have recently exceeded federal air quality standards for particulate matter, commonly known as soot. But Texas environmental regulators are proposing that only four of them be required to take action to improve their air quality.

In its proposal to exclude eight counties from stricter federal pollution rules, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality cited either bad air monitoring data or "exceptional events” — unusual or naturally-occurring events that can temporarily affect air quality such as wildfires, dust storms or emissions from outside the state.

The agency looked at air quality data from 2021-23 and proposed that four counties — Dallas, Harris (which includes Houston), Tarrant (Fort Worth), and Bowie (Texarkana) — be declared out of attainment with new federal air standards. But it’s recommending that eight other counties — Travis (which includes Austin), Montgomery (Conroe), Kleberg (Kingsville), Harrison (Marshall), Ellis (Waxahachie), Webb (Laredo), Hidalgo (McAllen) and Cameron (Harlingen and Brownsville) — be allowed to avoid the tougher standards.

Last year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency slashed the level of particulate matter permitted in the air from 12 to 9 micrograms per cubic meter annually, marking the first update to the standard since 2012. It was one of the most ambitious parts of the Biden administration’s environmental agenda.

Particulate matter comes from diesel engines, wildfires, construction site dust, coal-fired power plants and other industrial sources. Some researchers have labeled particulate matter the deadliest form of air pollution.

The new standards came in response to growing evidence of the severe health impacts associated with particulate matter, which can penetrate deep into the lungs, aggravating respiratory issues and increasing the risk of premature death.

State agencies are responsible for enforcing the federal standards. The TCEQ initially determined that all 12 counties exceeded the new standards, then dropped the number to four in a new assessment released in November.

“I was surprised when TCEQ claimed so many exceptional event days,” said Neil Carman, a former TCEQ investigator who is now clean air director for the Sierra Club in Texas. “I thought more counties would fall under nonattainment.”

Harris County, home to much of the state’s massive petrochemical industry, has the highest particulate matter levels in the state at 12.5 per cubic meter on average over three years, followed by Cameron, Bowie and Dallas counties.

Cameron County, on the Texas-Mexico border, was removed from the nonattainment list because TCEQ determined its air quality levels were heavily influenced by international emissions, including wildfires and agricultural burns in Mexico and Central America. Similarly, Kleberg County, which includes Kingsville, was excluded due to particulate matter from Saharan dust and smoke.

TCEQ also ruled out Harrison, Travis, Hidalgo and Webb counties using the exceptional events rule. For Ellis and Montgomery the agency cited bad air quality data.

Nonattainment designations trigger stricter controls on pollution sources, including technologies that clean and filter out particulate matter. It also requires states to develop plans for achieving compliance. Adopting measures to reduce soot can be costly for industries and local governments.

Industry groups have argued that wildfires and other events out of their control are major soot generators that have elevated levels in many areas. They also said the new EPA soot rules would make it difficult to obtain permits for new projects and hinder economic growth.

TCEQ’s three commissioners must approve the recommendations, then the agency must submit its proposal to the EPA by Feb. 7. The EPA can reject or modify the state’s proposal and may designate additional counties as out of attainment.

Texas regulators are taking input from the public on its recommendations until Jan. 21.
Is agency properly using exceptions?

Experts and advocates argue that TCEQ often improperly uses “exceptional events” to let counties avoid stricter regulations, making it harder to hold them accountable for improving air quality.

“If you take exceptional events out, how do you 100% know where the spike came from? What if it happened to be the same day a polluter was polluting?” said Jennifer Hadayia, executive director of the environmental nonprofit Air Alliance Houston.

“We know twice a year there are going to be fireworks. That's a given. We know generally a couple times a year Saharan dust will exist. That's a given,” she added. “So … if the intent is to accurately represent air quality, and then take steps to truly improve air quality, then we have to consider that those things are going to happen.”


Richard Richter, a TCEQ spokesperson, said the agency’s use of exceptional events is consistent with federal regulations and guidance.

For example, TCEQ identified 25 days between 2021 and 2023 when Harrison and Travis counties experienced particulate matter spikes from prescribed fires, Saharan dust (which regularly drifts across the Atlantic Ocean to North America), fires from Mexico and Central America, high winds and fireworks.

Daniel Cohan, an associate professor at Rice University, said that with Donald Trump returning to the White House, the EPA might be less likely to push back on the TCEQ’s recommendations.

“TCEQ may be hoping that the Trump administration will be more lenient in letting counties off the hook for their high pollution,” Cohan said.


Once designations are finalized, Texas will have two to three years to develop a compliance plan, which will also require EPA approval.
Inadequate air monitoring

While Texas has one of the largest air monitoring networks in the U.S., with 215 sites, only 54 of them measure particulate matter. Hadayia and other environmental advocates said this leaves many counties, including those with significant pollution sources, without air quality monitoring.


For example, Fort Bend County lacks a monitor to measure particulate matter despite being home to W.A. Parish Generating Station — the largest coal-fired power plant in Texas. A Rice University study in 2019 estimated that the plant emitted enough pollution to cause 178 premature deaths annually.

Yet the county was ruled as “unclassifiable” by the TCEQ because it does not have an air monitor and there’s no data to determine whether the area meets the new particulate matter standard — so industries in the county won’t have to implement any new restrictions to meet the standard.

Hadayia and others argue that more monitoring by TCEQ is essential to protecting public health.


“If we’re not putting protections in place, how will we ever bring air quality to healthy levels?” she said.

Williamson County, north of Austin, has the state’s largest number of quarries — open-pit mines for stone, sand, and gravel that release particulate matter — but has no particulate matter monitors, said Christina Schwerdtfeger, chief technical officer for the Coalition for Responsible Environmental Aggregate Mining. According to the TCEQ’s air monitoring database, the three air monitors in Williamson County measure pollutants other than particulate matter.

“[TCEQ] can’t just act like an ostrich with your head in the sand and say, well, we don’t have any data. We don’t know,” Schwerdtfeger said.

TCEQ said the agency determines the locations of air monitors based on population trends, the number of emission sources in a region, and air quality complaints by residents. The agency added that its statewide air monitoring network exceeds the number of monitors required by federal regulations.

Disclosure: Air Alliance Houston and Rice University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/01/15/texas-particulate-matter-air-pollution-rule-epa/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

 

Exposure to air pollution before pregnancy linked to higher child body mass index, study finds



An international research team co-led by the Keck School of Medicine of USC found that greater air pollution exposure in the three months before conception was associated with higher childhood obesity risk up to two years after birth.




Keck School of Medicine of USC



In a study of more than 5,000 mothers and their children, exposure to air pollution during the three months before pregnancy predicted higher child body mass index (BMI) and related obesity risk factors up to two years of age. Findings from the study, which was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, were published in the journal Environmental Research.

Past research has linked air pollution exposure during pregnancy to a broad range of health problems in children, including respiratory issues and a higher risk for chronic diseases such as obesity and heart problems. But few studies have focused on the preconception period, typically defined as the three months before a pregnancy begins. Environmental exposures during this timeframe can affect the health of sperm and eggs, which are in their final stages of growth.

In one of the largest studies to date of preconception environmental exposures, researchers from the Keck School of Medicine of USC, Duke University and Fudan University in Shanghai, China studied 5,834 mother-child pairs recruited from maternity clinics in Shanghai. They found that greater exposure to PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 before pregnancy was linked to increases in BMI or BMIZ, a standardized score that shows how a child’s BMI compares to others of the same age and sex.

“These findings imply that the three months before conception are important, and that people who plan to bear children should consider taking measures to lower their air pollution exposure to reduce their children’s risk for obesity,” said Jiawen Liao, PhD, a postdoctoral research associate in population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine and first author of the study.

Small but substantial changes

For the study, the field team, led by Weili Yan, PhD, and Guoying Huang, PhD, of the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, recruited and enrolled 5,834 women who visited 28 maternity clinics across Shanghai. This provided a rare opportunity: the ability to start collecting data before pregnancy even began.

To calculate air pollution exposure during the preconception period, the researchers developed state-of-the-art machine learning models. Led by Jim Zhang, PhD, of Duke University, they used a combination of satellite data, pollutant simulations and meteorological factors to estimate daily pollution exposure at each participant’s home address. They calculated levels of PM2.5 and PM10, two types of fine particulate matter, and NO2, which is mostly emitted by automobiles.

After birth, researchers also collected electronic medical records data of children’s weight and height at three-month intervals until age two. They used this data to calculate growth rate of weight, BMI, and BMIZ.=

They then compared participants with a relatively low exposure level (the 25th percentile of the cohort) to those with a relatively high exposure level (the 75th percentile of the cohort) to quantify how air pollution exposure was linked to different child outcomes.

A higher level of exposure to PM2.5 during the preconception period was associated with a 0.078 increase in child BMIZ at age two. A higher level of exposure to PM10 was associated with a 0.093 kg/m2 increase in BMI at age two. From six months onward, children with higher preconception exposure to all three pollutants had higher weight, BMI and BMIZ growth rates.

“The magnitude is small, but because air pollution is widespread and everybody is exposed, the risk of air pollution exposure on children’s obesity risk may be substantial and may start before their mothers’ pregnancy,” said Zhanghua Chen, PhD, an assistant professor of population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine and the study’s senior author.

Precautions for the public

The study is observational, so more research is needed to determine whether air pollution exposure before pregnancy directly affects childhood obesity risk. But the findings suggest that people can take action now to minimize potential harm to themselves and their children, the researchers said.

Measures include wearing a mask or staying inside as much as possible when outdoor air quality is poor, as well as using an air purified indoors. While the study focused on mothers, men who plan to conceive may benefit from taking similar precautions.

At the Keck School of Medicine, Liao, Chen and their colleagues are planning a new study to monitor preconception air pollution exposure in Southern California. They are also testing an intervention that uses indoor air purifiers to reduce the risk of heart and metabolic problems among the general population.

 

About this research

In addition to Liao, Zhang and Chen, the study’s other authors are Wu Chen, Zhenchun Yang, Chenyu Qiu and Frank D. Gilliland from the Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California; Yi Zhang from Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Kiros Berhane from Columbia University, New York, New York; Yihui Ge from Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Zhipeng Bai, Bin Han and Jia Xu from the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China; and Yong-hui Jiang from Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R01ES029945, P30ES007048].